Here is the story of the four children, one my own, and the three others belonging to other parents

that I have met in the last year since my son died.

Like the others in our sad little group, I do not like to talk about what happened to my beautiful son,
Luke Borusiewicz. I will say one thing, when I look at the photos of our last visit together, I can see
the love for me in his eyes, on his poor little scratched face. Two days later a scratch on his penis
that needed him to be taken to the doctor it was so severe. They ignored pleas from myself and
Lukes mother. These people answer to noone.

I have the parents of these deceased children's permission to discuss it though, and to cast it into the
public light. None of us want our children to be forgotten, and we all want justice. I know it is
inevitable that I will meet more parents whose children have died in foster care due to this
departments blatant negligence. If you know of anyone, please send them to me, it is time that we
all came together, and expose what has, is and will be happening.... michael@lukesarmy.com Here
is my profile on facebook... http://www.facebook.com/group.php?
gid=177005468124&v=photos&ref=ts#!/profile.php?id=100000922697911

This department believes that 100% of it's workers are right, 100% of the time. Nobody is perfect,
we all know that. I tried and tried and tried to get my son back. Ask any one of the thousand who
have been wronged by these child safety departments Australia wide, to these workers, many of the
senior ones especially, this is some sick sort of game, where their prejudices and narrow
mindedness is at the forefront, they are right no matter what, and if there is a personality clash,
watch out, your child is going to pay for it.

My son was born on september 22 2006. He died on the 18th of January, 2009. He was two years
and four months. It breaks my heart to talk about it, to think about it, I dream almost everyday about
it, waking up crying, how I miss my son so much....After every visit I would watch them drive
away with Luke and pretend all was as it should be, then drop to the ground and cry in front of the
playground. Two hours a week for the last six months of his life was all I got to spend with the son I
loved, adored, treasured, worshipped...and then he was sent back to foster care, a little baby being
moved from strangers house to strangers house, not having a clue what was happening, terrifying to
him, and to the father that loved him so much.

Because it pains me so to talk about it, I would ask that if you would like to know more about his
story in particular, please visit the site I have built for him at http://lukesarmy.com/

If you would like to show your support, there is little you can do apart from joining Luke's Army at
that site, and also becoming a member of Luke's Army Group on Facebook.

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=177005468124&ref=ts

The coroners report is going to take around three years I have been told. This should shed some
more light onto what actually happened to Luke, how he was injured so severely, and why he had
constant injuries, and why the department failed to act on this information, as well as the complaints
from both Luke's Parents.

I will now begin to tell the story of how the next child, a ten month old baby girl died due to the
negligence of The Department of Child Safety in South Australia.

The mother of this baby was in foster care when she was a child, with a good family and therefore
thought it prudent to ask the department to place her beloved daughter in foster care for a week, as
she was homeless, but her dream home was to be completed in a weeks time, and they would live
out their dream together as a family, she also had two older sons.
The department assured her that the baby would be placed into a safe environment. This was
definitely not the case. The ten month old, beautiful, innocent, helpless.....little girl was put with an
old lady, so severly handicapped that this woman was unable to even change nappies for the baby.
She could not lift the child, and the child was placed into a cot and left, left to drown on her bottle,
covered in truly severe nappy rash, from not having her nappies changed.

The day after that little girl died, the old lady had carpul tunnel surgery. She was severyly
handicapped, and the department knew of it. This matter has been through the courts in SA, and the
mother is forbidden to talk of it. This is how they keep this epidemic quiet, as well as media laws
working in the favour of these child safety departments Australia wide. It all gets swept under the
carpet....Until now.

Since I started Luke's Army, which was to be just me, there are thousands who have rallied behind
me giving me support and strength. There is not a week goes by when I am not contacted by a
devistated parent, feeling powerless and mistreated by these departments. There are also numerous
groups that have formed all with the one goal of exosing this corrupt and unjust system, and
fighting to have the children they love returned.

This brings me to the next child. We have a ten month old, my two year old, and this child was
three years old, one of a pair, twins, taken by DoCS NSW. The mother fought tirelessly to have her
children returned, and won.

DoCS appealed this decision, and the twins remained in foster care. There is a serious shortage of
foster carers but this makes no difference to the child safety departments. They also stand by their
claims that removing a child from their parents does not harm a child at all. This makes it all the
more frustrating for the loving parents who know and also feel the pain of being torn from a loving
family.

Tragically, one of the twins died a month after the appeal. The story gets worse.

The baby was so sick, she had pnemonia. The child was not even taken to the doctors. Worse still,
the baby was not even in the care of the foster carer when she left to die. Instead of taking this
critically ill child to the doctor, these foster carers put them with a baby sitter and went out. The
child was left unchecked and died of pnemonia whilst laying in the cot at the baby sitters. This is a
child that was everything the parents lived for, as was my son, and the next child I will bring to
light.

Whilst my son died due to the negligence of the department of child safety in Qld, The ten month
old girl died due to the negligence of child safety SA, the three year old twin was in NSW and so is
the next child.

This child was sixteen, and in foster care. This was not due to bad parenting, but by choice. This
sixteen year old boy chose to stay with this foster carer.

This is the site that the boy Nathan's mother has built for him.
http://www.nathansjustice.com/

Here is Nathan's mothers version of what has happened, taken from this site.

May this be shared with the AUSTRALIAN people and with people all over the WORLD. I am
hoping in the face of humanity people will open their hearts and it be PETITION with me to no
longer allow Nathan to be silenced. I hope his voice will finally be heard and the FIGHT for his
JUSTICE OCCUR. We all need to make this life a safer place, for the best part of who we are, our
children. My beautiful baby boy was taken from me avoidably too soon and if the tragic loss of his
life can save another in a similar position, his death will not be completely in vain. The truth needs
to be heard.

Nathan was only 16 years old when his life was cut short by a stab wound to the heart. He was in
the care of Graham McLeish, now known as Mark McLennan.

THIS MAN IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NATHANS DEATH AND CHARGES NEED TO BE

LAYED.
These are the findings of the Coronial Inquest into Nathans death. Case No: 1134/05

‘222. It is from this point on that the evidence Mr. McLeish’s contribution to Nathan’s death
becomes more overwhelming. The evidence is that Mr. McLeish sought medical assistance for
Nathan in the immediate wake of the injury. However, the evidence also is his failure to tell the true
history of Nathan’s injury to the hospital misled the medical investigations. The evidence is that the
accurate history of would have caused a different medical response and may well have resulted in
the true extent of Nathan’s injury being discovered on his first presentation.’

?. The evidence is that Nathan’s prospects of survival from that injury with appropriate diagnosis
and timely treatment were not in question. Mr. McLeish, despite his own views about what the
hospital needed to know was told by his own friend whose counsel he sought early that morning
that he should tell the truth. Throughout the day he made several calls seeking medical advice. It
was all the same advice. Advice that he should return Nathan to the hospital and have him re
assessed. Advice he did not take at any point up until it was too late. Even after Nathan lapsed into
unconsciousness Mr. McLeish did not tell the truth to the treating paramedics or doctors’

‘225. I conclude from the weight of the evidence that had Nathan been returned to the hospital
earlier in the day, even in the wake of the call McLeish made at about 2pm and then given a truth of
the mechanism of Nathan’s injury Nathan’s prospects of a correct diagnosis and appropriate
treatment and therefore survival would have been reasonable.

?. …In my view Graham McLeish’s failure to give a true account to the hospital of Nathan’s
mechanism of injury, compounded by his failure to return Nathan to the hospital in circumstances
where his condition remained unimproved and he was sufficiently worried to be calling for advice
and receiving advice to return Nathan to the hospital contributed to Nathan’s death’ .

WHY HAS THIS MAN, 4 YEARS AFTER NATHAN DIED, STILL NOT BEEN HELD
ACCOUNTABLE IN A COURT OF LAW FOR THE DEATH OF MY SON?

BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND NATHAN'S FINAL DAYS

Grahame McLeish, who was nominated as being adequate by the department of HUMAN
SERVICES DANDENONG, had taken Nathan to hospital on the 31st of March, 2005 with a wound
to his chest and wounds to his wrist SAYING that Nathan had been running while wearing socks to
turn up his stereo and had slipped and fallen into a Louvre window which broke and that is how
Nathan sustained his injuries. THAT was proven in the Coronial Inquest TO BE A LIE.

Nathan was driven to the hospital by Graham McLeish who did not call an ambulance.
Nathan was taken in via wheelchair, described as being pale, very distressed, gagging and vomiting
violently and wretched.

McLeish told medical staff he was Nathan’s stepfather. THAT IS A LIE.

Nathan was put onto oxygen and treated for a NON-PENETRATING chest wound (falling glass) as
the incident history McLeish supplied had implied this was the case. IT WAS NOT

Nathan’s injury had been in fact caused by an 8cm KNIFE.

Nathan needed treatment for a PENETRATING chest would as the knife had actually been plunged
into him 6cm deep and wounding his heart.

Nathan did not communicate with medical staff as McLeish insisted on doing all the talking. He
only answered monosyllabically to where the pain was in his chest. The medical staff reported to
the Coronial Inquest that they found it odd McLeish did not leave Nathan’s side AT ALL.

Nathan’s chest was sutured and was released back into McLeish’s care after he was regarded as
stable. He was still unwell, vomiting some bilious fluid as he left and dozing due to the morphine
that he was given a few times in relation to his pain. He did not appear to be a child ready to go
home.

Nathan was in fact DYING from internal bleeding.

The knife, not glass as reported by McLeish, had sliced 6mm through his heart. The skin, cartilage
and muscle tissue in the chest area is described as tough like leather. To penetrate this area of the
body requires tremendous and deliberate force.

Nathan returned home with McLeish at 8.45 am. McLeish called the hospital later that day at 2pm
as Nathan was still vomiting. He was told to bring Nathan back. HE DID NOT.

At 6.30pm Nathan was still very ill and McLeish called a locum service for a doctor to see Nathan.
He was told it was a 3-4 hour wait and was advised by the nurse who took the call, to take Nathan
back to the hospital. HE DID NOT

At 10.00pm again McLeish called the hospital reporting Nathan was very ill. The nurse who took
the call reported hearing noises and McLeish said Nathan had fallen out of bed. The nurse advised
him to bring him back to hospital. HE DID NOT.

At 10.25pm finally McLeish called and ambulance as Nathan’s heart had stopped. Paramedics were
able to restore circulation however Nathan had lost a considerable amount of blood and been
without oxygen for a prolonged period of time. Nathan’s neurological state was very poor and his
pupils were unresponsive to light.
Nathan was pronounced dead by two doctors and life support was withdrawn at 6.05 pm on the 3rd
of April, 2005.

FACTS.

If the injury was known by doctors was to be caused by a knife different investigations and
treatments would have been CONDUCTED by the hospital. Nathan would have had the URGENT
MEDICAL ATTENTION he required. He WOULD have made a full recovery. HE WOULD still
be here today.

MCLEISH WAS FULLY AWARE OF THE NATURE OF HIS INJURY AND THE FACT IT
WAS A KNIFE.

NATHAN BECAME CRITICALLY ILL OVER A 10 HOUR PERIOD AND LAY DYING
WHILE MCLEISH KEPT LYING.
WHY?? WHAT DID HE HAVE TO HIDE?

EVIDENCE OF MCLEISH’S CONTRIBUTION AND GROSS MISCONDUCT & CRIMINAL

NEGLIGENCE.

1. Here was a man fully aware of the nature of Nathans injury and refused to take him to hospital 3
times when advised to. McLeish has been fraudulent in the past and portrayed himself as a solicitor
involved in criminal and family law for many, many years. He was in fact a law clerk. He lied about
Nathan’s injury; he lied about being Nathan’s father. What else is he lying about?

2.THERE WAS A DOCTORS SURGERY DIRECTLY ACROSS THE ROAD THAT WAS OPEN
THAT EVENING ,TO JUST AFTER 5PM,where he had been himself before and could have gone
and sought urgent medical attention ,either by taking Nathan there or requesting a doctor come see
Nathan as he lay in bed incapacitated and critically ill.

3.HE HAD MADE A PHONE CALL TO THE HOSPITAL AT 2PM CONCERNED ABOUT
NATHANS VOMITING ALL DAY AND WAS ASKED IF HE WAS CONCERNED TO BRING
HIM BACK AND HIS VOMITING WAS UNLIKELY DUE TO MORPHINE BECAUSE OF
THE TIME THAT HAD LAPSED AND SAID HE WAS HIS.. FATHER...

4. THE HOSPITAL WAS A 7 MINIUTE DRIVE OR LESS.

5.NATHAN WAS SO CRITICALLY ILL, THAT MCLEISH ORDED HIMSELF A PIZZA AND
DECIDED TO EAT IT DOWN STAIRS AS NATHAN WAS SO ILL AND VOMITING & DRY
WREACHING,WAS DESRCIBED AS SWEATY AND PALE,WOULD HAVE, I IMAGINE
BEEN FAR MORE DISTRESSED THAN HE WAS IN HOSPITAL ON HIS FIRST ADMISSION
AS HE WAS GETTING WORSE NOT BETTER AND DYING.
6. MCLEISH BURNT NATHAN’S T/SHIRT, HIS DIARY ……HIS EXPLANATION WAS
THAT THE T/SHIRT WAS BLOODIED AND YET DIDN’T BURN NATHANS BLOODIED
PANTS OR SOCKS??

7. WHEN NATHAN PRESENTED THE FIRST TIME TO THE HOSPITAL THE WOUND WAS
GAPING BUT DRY AND HIS WRIST WOUNDS WERE ALSO CLEAN AND DRY AND HE
WAS WEARING A CLEAN T/SHIRT WITH NO BLOOD ON IT……

8. EVIDENCE BY A PROFESSIONAL SAID HE WAS SURPRISED AT NATHANS CHEST

WOUND BEING DRY & WOULD HAVE EXPECTED IT TO HAVE BEEN ACTIVELY
BLEEDING FOR 45 MINIUTES OR MORE, which allows you to see that Nathan wasn’t taken
straight away to hospital and was instead cleaned of blood loss evidence. Bare in mind he was
described as being wretched and violently vomiting and been brought in via a wheel chair. How
much had he suffered before finally getting medical attention?

9. WHY DID MCLEISH BREAK THE WINDOW TO CORROBORATE HIS STORY TO THE
POLICE!!!!

PROSECUTIONATHAN AND I NEED YOU, YOUR FRIENDS AND YOUR FAMILIES HELP
TO HAVE ALL THESE QUESTIONS ANSWERED OF GRAHAM MCLEISH IN A COURT OF
LAW. THE CORONIAL INQUEST’S RECOMMENDATIONS HAVE NOT YET BEEN
PASSED ONTO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC NS. WHY NOT? WE NEED 18,000
SIGNATURES ON OUR PETITION THAT WILL BE SENT TO PARLIMENT, THE DPP AND
THE PREMIER’S OFFICE IN VICTORIA. PLEASE JOIN US IN SENDING A MESSAGE TO
OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM THAT DESPITE THE MONETARY COST OF A TRIAL, ONE LIFE,
NATHAN’S LIFE AND NATHAN’S JUSTICE IS PRICELESS.
PLEASE CLICK ON THE PETITION LINK AND SIGN YOUR NAME.
My family and I sincerely thank you for taking the time.
Michelle and Nathan Stewart.