Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 16

RELEASED BY GLAS CMO (GSFC) 11/17/00 (LMS) GLAS-545-SPEC-004

REVISION A

STATEMENT OF WORK
FOR
GEOSCIENCE LASER ALTIMETER SYSTEM
FLIGHT
LOOP HEAT PIPES

GLAS-545-SPEC-004

September 17, 1999

Prepared by
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Goddard Space Flight Center
Greenbelt, Maryland 20771

CHECK THE CoMITS DATABASE AT


http://instra2.gsfc.nasa.gov:9001/comits/query/docs
TO VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE CORRECT VERSION PRIOR TO USE.

1
GLAS-545-SPEC-004
REVISION A
SIGNATURE LIST

Prepared By:

Charles Baker, OSC 10/05/1999


Charles Baker, OSC
GLAS Thermal Analyst

Reviewed and Approved By:

Eric Grob, GSFC 11/14/2000


Eric Grob, GSFC Date
GLAS Thermal Lead

Ron Follas, SSAI 10/05/1999


Ron Follas, SSAI Date
GLAS Instrument Manager

Cheryl Salerno 10/05/1999


Cheryl Salerno, GSFC Date
GLAS Mechanical Subsystem Lead Engineer

Eleanor Ketchum, GSFC 10/06/1999


Eleanor Ketchum, GSFC Date
GLAS Systems Engineer

2
GLAS-545-SPEC-004
REVISION A
REVISION LOG

This log identifies those portions of the specification that have been revised since the
release of the original issue.

REVISION PARAGRAPH NUMBER (S) AFFECTED REV. DATE APPROVAL

- Initial Release 10/05/1999 C. Baker


A See GLAS-CCR-106 11/17/2000 C. Baker

3
GLAS-545-SPEC-004
REVISION A

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. 4

1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 6

1.1 SCOPE................................................................................................................................................. 6

1.2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.......................................................................................................... 6

1.3 DELIVERABLES................................................................................................................................ 6

1.4 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED EQUIPMENT ................................................................................. 6

1.5 SCHEDULE......................................................................................................................................... 7

2.0 MANAGEMENT, REPORTING, AND DOCUMENTATION......................................................... 7

2.1 MANAGEMENT AND REPORTING ............................................................................................... 7

2.2 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................... 7

2.3 REPORTING AND DOCUMENTATION......................................................................................... 9

2.4 REVIEWS ............................................................................................................................................ 9

2.4.1 INTERNAL CONTRACTOR REVIEWS..................................................................................... 9

2.4.2 REVIEWS WITH GSFC ................................................................................................................ 9

2.4.3 ACTIVITY FLOW PLAN ............................................................................................................. 10

3.0 ENGINEERING................................................................................................................................. 10

3.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS........................................................................................................ 10

3.2 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ANALYSIS ............................................................................... 10

3.3 THERMAL ENGINEERING ANALYSIS ....................................................................................... 10

3.4 MATERIAL AND PROCESSES REQUIREMENTS ................................................................... 11

4.0 LHP SYSTEM DESIGN................................................................................................................... 11

5.0 HARDWARE FABRICATION, ASSEMBLY, AND TEST .......................................................... 12

5.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS........................................................................................................ 12

5.2 DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................ 13

5.3 LOT AND MATERIAL ACCEPTANCE TESTS........................................................................... 15

5.4 QUALIFICATION TESTS ............................................................................................................... 15

4
GLAS-545-SPEC-004
REVISION A
5.5 ACCEPTANCE TESTS ................................................................................................................... 15

6.0 PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS.................................................................. 15

6.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS........................................................................................................ 15

6.2 ASSURANCE REVIEW REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................. 15

6.3 VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................... 15

6.4 MATERIALS AND PROCESS REQUIREMENTS...................................................................... 15

6.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS................................................................................ 15

7.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS ........................................................................................................ 16

8.0 SHIPPING.......................................................................................................................................... 16

5
GLAS-545-SPEC-004
REVISION A
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Scope

This Statement Of Work (SOW) defines the effort to be contracted for NASA/Goddard
space Flight Center (GSFC) to accomplish the design, fabrication, assembly,
development, test, and delivery of the flight GLAS instrument Loop Heat Pipe (LHP)
systems, hereafter referred to as LHP systems (or hardware), and their associated
Ground Support Equipment (GSE) and documentation. The GSE includes, but is not
limited to, any hardware need for proper installation, shipping containers, testing, and
protective covers.

The work required by this SOW shall be accomplished in accordance with the
requirements of the documents listed in Section 7, List of Applicable documents.

1.2 General Requirements

The contractor shall furnish the necessary management, labor, facilities, materials, tools,
and equipment and do all things necessary to accomplish the work specified herein. In
general, the contractor shall design and produce the LHP Systems that must survive the
GLAS launch environment, and operate in orbit for at least 60 months and operate in 1-g
in orientation specified in the Performance Specification GLAS-545-SPEC-005.

1.3 Deliverables

All hardware deliverables are outlined and defined below:

Drawing Description Drawing Number Quantity


Laser LHP System 2037760 1
Component LHP System 2037750 1
Test Heat Pipe 2037755 2
Component Test Heat Pipe 2037756 1
thermal mass 2025987 2
Coupling Blocks 2037747 20
Shipping Containers 2
Table 1 – List of Hardware Deliverables

All analysis deliverables are outlined and defined below further outlined in Secion 3.2
and 3.3:

Deliverable Analyses
Structural Analysis
Heat Transport Capability Analysis
Conductance SINDA Models for Evaporator and Condenser
Overall Conductance Analysis
Fluid Charge and Fluid Inventory Analysis
Table 2 – List of Analysis Deliverables

1.4 Government Furnished Equipment

6
GLAS-545-SPEC-004
REVISION A
All Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) are outlined and defined below Table 3:

Drawing Description Drawing Number Quantity


LHP CC Controllers 2038498 2
On/Off Controller Power Measurement 2038499 1
Circuit
Component LHP GSE installation TBD 1
Laser LHP GSE installation TBD 1
Table 3 – Government Furnished Equipment

1.5 Schedule

The LHP Systems program has at least three major milestones: Preliminary Design
Review (PDR), Critical Design Review (CDR), and the ship date. The required schedule
for this program is: PDR 3 week After Receipt of Order (ARO), CDR 7 weeks ARO, and
delivery of all hardware and documentation 26 weeks ARO. The hardware and
documentation shall be delivered to GSFC as a portion of this program scope.

2.0 Management, Reporting, and Documentation


2.1 Management and Reporting

The contractor shall designate a single individual who will be given full responsibility and
authority to manage and administer all phases of the work specified by the contract and
ensure that all objectives are accomplished as required by the contract.

The contractor shall designate and identify by name a single individual who shall serve
as a point of contact with the GSFC Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative
(COTR) for all technical aspects of the contract.

The contractor shall provide for managing all resources, controlling schedules, managing
all engineering, manufacturing and procurement activities, configuration management,
Quality Assurance (QA), documentation control, and distribution.

The contractor shall generate a list of significant milestones that will enable GSFC to
ascertain work progress.

The contractor shall prepare and present to GSFC a Weekly Progress Review via
telephone and a written Monthly Status Report. The Weekly Progress Review and the
Monthly Status Report shall be a summary presentation of the progress, problem areas,
activities ongoing and planned, including but not limited to, the status of this
procurement, milestone schedule, personnel changes, current action items, Reliability
and Quality Assurance (R&QA), etc. Schedule reporting shall include report dates and
identification of critical paths to reflect the current status of the effort.

2.2 Configuration Management

The contractor shall conduct Configuration Management (CM) activities in accordance


with a GSFC approved Configuration Management Plan and shall control the design of
the LHP Systems by means of drawings, specification, and other documents, and shall

7
GLAS-545-SPEC-004
REVISION A
control and classify all changes as Class I or Class II. These changes shall be outlined
in an Engineering Change Notice (ECN).

Class I changes are defined as those affecting the contract schedule, performance, the
agreed-to-baseline configuration, safety, interfaces or changes to the GSFC approved
documents. Class I changes require written GSFC contracting officer approval prior to
implementation. Class II changes will be controlled and dispositioned by the contractor;
GSFC reserves the right to review all Class II changes for technical content to ensure
the proper classification has been assigned. Documented evidence will be required to
demonstrate that the LHP systems are configured in accordance with defining
documentation, including the latest approved changes. The contractor shall prepare and
submit a Configured Articles List (CAL) when the system is ready for delivery. This shall
include as a minimum: parts, materials, and final drawings and shall be a part of the
“Acceptance Data Package”.

The contractor shall ensure control of all documents and changes thereto that affect the
flight LHP systems. QA personnel shall ensure that documents and changes are
controlled in accordance with GSFC approved Configuration Management Plan. The
Configuration Management Plan needs to be completed by the vendor and approved by
GSFC by PDR. The contractor shall ensure that the effect of the documents and
changes are clearly specified, changes are accomplished on affected articles, and
changed articles are appropriately identified. Documents shall be kept current and all
fabrication, inspections and tests shall be performed according to the most recent
drawings and changes. The inspection record of the product shall indicate the change
level with which it is in compliance.

Prior to release of a drawing or a change to a drawing released to manufacturing, the


drawing/change shall be submitted through a checking cycle. The issue numbers of the
drawings and specifications to which the particular hardware has been fabricated,
inspected, and tested shall be documented as the as-built configuration. Evidence shall
be provided of compliance with the as-built documentation as a basis for acceptance of
the hardware. This information shall be submitted as part of the Acceptance Data
Package.

A Contractor QA representative shall be a member of the Configuration Control Board.


The QA shall be defined in the Configuration Management Plan and described in detail.

The Contractor shall maintain a product identification and tracking system. Each product
shall be identified by a unique part or type number, consistent with the configuration
management system for the Contract. Where control of individual products or lots of
products is required, date codes, lot numbers, serial numbers, or other identification,
shall be used as appropriate. Serial numbers and lot numbers shall be assigned in
consecutive order.

The configuration management system shall be capable of retrieving the identification


and serialization record at the subassembly level. Beginning at the subassembly level
and continuing through the end product, the system shall be capable of tracing backward
to the process, assembly, or test. Identification and serialization data lower that that for
subassemblies shall be maintained in the manufacturing and processing records or
engineering notebooks and shall contain date code, lot numbers, and manufacturer of

8
GLAS-545-SPEC-004
REVISION A
the item. The Contractor is encouraged to make use of his existing identification and
traceability system. Serial numbers of scrapped products shall not be reused.

2.3 Reporting and Documentation

The Contractor shall generate and maintain all documentation required to manage the
work effort, and to document the design in accordance with contractual requirements.
This includes, but is not limited to, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, and
reports. The Contractor shall ensure the generation and delivery of all documentation,
reviews and hardware as called for in the contract.

In addition to that documentation specifically called for in the Contract, upon request by
the GSFC, the Contractor shall make available a copy of any document or data
generated during this Contract performance for review by the GSFC at the Contractor's
facility. This includes, analyses, parts and materials data, test data, alerts, etc. A listing
of the documents generated shall be submitted on a monthly basis as part of the
monthly report.

2.4 Reviews
2.4.1 Internal Contractor Reviews

The contractor shall plan, conduct, and document internal design reviews for the
hardware. Reviews shall be conducted by personnel not directly involved in the
hardware under review. Summaries of these reviews and resulting action items shall be
included in the Project Status Reports. Prior to committing any design to manufacturing,
the Contractor shall conduct a detailed review of the design to ensure that all
requirements, such as structural, thermal, materials outgassing, contamination,
fabrication/assembly, and processes requirements are satisfied; all analyses are
complete; and that all parts and materials lists, including Materials Usage Agreements
(MUAs), are approved. The Contractor shall review and concur in any analyses
accomplished by a subcontractor or supplier.

2.4.2 Reviews with GSFC

The Contractor shall organize and present the following reviews to a GSFC Review
Team at the facilities noted and at the times indicated, as defined by the Contract:

a. Weekly Progress Review: To be held via telephone. (Defined in section 2.1 of


this document.)

b. Preliminary Design Review (PDR): To be held at the Contractor's plant.

c. Critical Design Review (CDR): To be held at the Contractor's plant.

d. Pre-Test Review: To be held at the Contractor's plant.

f. Post-Test Critique and Pre-Shipment Review (PSR): To be held at the


Contractor's plant.

All reviews listed above shall address the current status within the Activity Flow Plan
listed in Section 2.4.3. The Contractor shall provided GSFC at least 10 days of notice of

9
GLAS-545-SPEC-004
REVISION A
each design review. These reviews shall encompass all hardware and documentation
required by the Contract. The contractor shall ensure that the appropriate review
documentation is provided. It shall consist of view-graphs and a Design Review Data
Package. The level of detail shall be consistent with the review objectives and permit an
assessment of the items under review. As a minimum, the review package shall consist
of the following types of items, as analyses and results, reports drawings, schematics,
block results, qualification and acceptance data, analytical models, are expected to be
as up-to-date as practical, and consequently, need not be totally consistent with the
review data package. Differences, however, shall be explained. Review minutes shall
be prepared and, as a minimum, shall include attendance, action items, accomplishment
responsibility and agreements. All items shall be in sufficient detail to be self-
explanatory. A Design Review Report shall be prepared following each review and, as a
minimum, contain meeting notice, agenda, review meeting minutes described above,
and responses to all recommendations and action items.

2.4.3 Activity Flow Plan

The contractor shall prepare and submit to GSFC an Activity Flow Plan. This plan
defines the order and durations of all activities associated with the hardware. Once
established, the Activity Flow Plan shall be used as a basis for reporting milestone
schedule activity.

3.0 Engineering
3.1 General Requirements

The contractor shall design, test, fabricate, and deliver to GSFC two (2) flight qualified
LHP Systems to meet the requirements of this SOW, and the performance specification,
GLAS-545-SPEC-005. Previously unqualified hardware or any unqualified parts of that
hardware must successfully meet the qualification or acceptance testing as defined in
this SOW.

The Contractor shall generate and deliver to GSFC the specific engineering analyses
defined in this section. Each specific engineering analysis shall document and
emphasize the limitation of each LHP System and its performance within the expected
environments including the shipping environment, the spacecraft launch environment,
and the on-orbit environment. The analyses shall be presented at CDR, with preliminary
results presented at PDR.

3.2 Structural Engineering Analysis

The structural analysis shall be conducted and documented for the LHP envelope. The
structural analysis shall verify that the LHP envelope can meet the pressure containment
and random vibration and static load requirements defined in the performance
specification, GLAS-545-SPEC-005. A LHP Structural Analysis Report shall be
prepared and submitted to GSFC. The report shall contain all of the analyses and other
data certifying that the design conforms to specification GLAS-545-SPEC-005.

3.3 Thermal Engineering Analysis

10
GLAS-545-SPEC-004
REVISION A
The thermal analyses shall be conducted and documented to verify the performance
requirements of specification GLAS-545-SPEC-005. The analyses shall include the
following:

a. 1-g and 0-g heat transport capability predictions at the maximum and minimum of
the qualification temperature range at the compensation chamber as defined in
GLAS-545-SPEC-005. The 1-g heat transport capability shall be calculated and
presented in a graph that shows transport capability over the minimum to the
maximum adverse-height test orientations.

b. Two-dimensional steady state SINDA thermal models of both of the LHP


evaporators shall be developed to determine the thermal conductance for the
evaporator from the vapor of the heat pipe source to the LHP vapor temperature.
Thermal conductance calculations shall include all degradation factors, such as,
single sided heat input on the heat pipe, interface conductance losses, etc. A
conductance calculation in the condenser shall also be made based on the
condenser’s direct condensation region. These thermal conductance values
shall be reported for both the evaporator and condenser sections at the
maximum and minimum of the qualification temperature range at the
compensation chamber as defined in GLAS-545-SPEC-005. Additionally,
calculations shall be reported and models supplied to GSFC.

c. Overall conductance predicts for both LHP systems shall be supplied from the
heat pipe vapor (source) to the radiator surface (sink) taking into account:
subcooling region of radiator, fin efficiency, coupling of liquid and vapor lines, and
interface conductances as provided by GSFC. This analysis shall also include a
trade study that estimates the amount of coupling required between the liquid
and vapor lines for each LHP system. GSFC shall supply the environmental
fluxes and couplings to space for the radiators.

d. Working fluid charge analysis and fluid inventory predicts shall be summarized
for GSFC at the maximum qualification temperature, at the minimum qualification
temperature, and at the maximum non-operating temperature as defined in
GLAS-545-SPEC-005. Minimum and maximum charges shall be in accordance
with GLAS-545-SPEC-005. Analysis results shall be presented as percent liquid
fill by volume of the major LHP components, such as, the primary wick,
secondary wick, evaporator liquid core, compensation chamber, vapor grooves,
vapor line, liquid line, condenser. The total volume of each of the components
shall also be provided.

3.4 Material and Processes Requirements

The materials and processes used for the LHP Systems shall meet all the requirements
of specification GLAS-545-SPEC-005 and Appendix 6 of GLAS-303-REQ-001. In
accordance with Appendix 6 of GLAS-303-REQ-001, the Contractor shall submit to
GSFC for review a Preliminary Materials and Processes List and a Preliminary Inorganic
Materials List. These lists shall be submitted to GSFC by CDR. The contractor shall
also submit to GSFC for approval a Final Materials and Processes List and Final
Inorganic Materials List. This shall be submitted to GSFC by the pre-ship review

4.0 LHP System Design

11
GLAS-545-SPEC-004
REVISION A

On the basis of the results of the detailed thermal analysis, the Contractor shall complete
the detailed design of the hardware, including any Ground Support Equipment (GSE),
test fixtures, and test support equipment used to support the overall test program. GSE
shall also be required to protect the LHP system during shipment and installation. All
GSE that supports flight hardware shall meet the requirements of specification GLAS-
545-SPEC-005, Section 3.3.3.1.

The Contractor shall document the design by means of manufacturing/fabrication/


assembly drawings or other documents such as, layouts, equipment lists, etc., to permit
design evaluation, interface control, fabrication, assembly, test and inspection of the
hardware. The controlling document shall be defined and the verification method
employed (i.e., inspection, test, or demonstration) to prove that the design is in
accordance with the controlling document. All drawings shall be submitted to a formal
checking cycle prior to release to manufacturing, to ensure that all requirements have
been satisfied. After release, the drawings shall be modified by an approved
engineering change notice (ECN). ECNs need to be incorporated into drawings until 10
ECNs against a single drawing have been generated. Before the end of the program, all
changes shall be incorporated into drawings. One reproducible copy of flight hardware
drawings and ECNs shall be prepared and submitted to GSFC along with an electronic
copy that is a file formatted in a mutually agreed upon file format.

5.0 Hardware Fabrication, Assembly, and Test


5.1 General Requirements

The contractor shall implement and maintain a Fabrication and Assembly Flow Plan to
coordinate all manufacturing work activities to ensure a timely fabrication and assembly
effort. The flowchart shall be supplemented by Contractor prepared documentation
necessary to: fabricate assemble the hardware, monitor performance, provide
forecasting, scheduling, and status information. The control system shall ensure that
any materials used in the fabrication and assembly cycle are in fact certified to be in
accordance with the controlling documentation. All materials shall be stored and
otherwise protected from unauthorized usage and inadvertent damage.

The Contractor shall fabricate and assemble the hardware. The Contractor shall verify
through appropriate tests and inspections that the hardware has been fabricated and
assembled in accordance with the controlling documentation. GSFC shall have the
option to inspect hardware during the fabrication process. The controlling
documentation (e.g. drawings, specifications, and build records) shall reflect the as-
designed, as built, as inspected, and as-tested configuration of the hardware before the
hardware is moved to its next scheduled station or event.

Prior to delivering the flight LHP systems for an acceptance test or integration,
whichever occurs first, a Configuration Inspection shall be accomplished to ensure that
the hardware is in accordance with the controlling documentation.

The Contractor shall document all results of all inspections. Instances of non-
conformance and their dispositions shall be documented as specified herein. Non-
conformances shall be resolved in a timely fashion. Hardware with open items cannot
be moved to its next scheduled activity unless the open item(s) is understood to have no
impact on subsequent events.

12
GLAS-545-SPEC-004
REVISION A

Documentation shall accompany the hardware to indicate its status. The documentation
shall include color photographs or videos of those elements that cannot be visually
inspected at a later time without destructive disassembly of the hardware.

The Contractor shall supply any protective covers or handling fixtures to GSFC.

The Contractor shall design and built test equipment that is necessary to test the
hardware throughout the program. The Contractor shall use existing equipment to the
maximum extent possible.

The Contractor shall purchase and maintain sufficient spare parts and stock materials so
that repairs or replacements can be made quickly when required. Selected spare parts
such as evaporator saddles, knife edge seals, compensation chamber parts, transition
tubes, etc. shall be maintained at the vendor for three years following the delivery of the
flight LHP systems. These spare parts shall be made available at no charge if any
damage occurs to the LHP systems at any time and repairs requiring the spare parts
occur. The spare parts shall be considered flight spare parts and include all necessary
documentation.

5.2 Documentation Requirements

The Contractor shall generate documentation such as specifications, drawings, plans,


procedures and reports that shall be prepared and/or submitted in accordance with the
contract, SOW, and the specification GLAS-545-SPEC-005.

This documentation (with the exception of the Acceptance data package and LHP
systems test report) shall be submitted to GSFC at CDR. If any Class I design changes
occur per Section 2.2 of this document, any effected documentation shall be updated
and submitted to GSFC within fifteen (15) days. All documentation shall be submitted in
final form with the delivery of the LHP Systems

a. Interface Control Drawing - The Contractor shall generate and submit to GSFC
for approval an Interface Control Drawing (ICD) defining the interfaces between
the LHP System and the instrument. The ICD shall describe in detail the
mechanical interface.

b. Weight Report - The Contractor shall generate, document, update, and maintain
a Weight Report that shall be submitted to GSFC. The total weight of each LHP
System and it propylene charge shall be given in the report to an accuracy of
0.25 grams. Weights shall be reported with a 0.1 gram resolution.

c. Manufacturing Drawings - The Contractor shall generate and submit to GSFC As


Built Manufacturing Drawings which describe in detail the physical, mechanical,
and thermal design of the LHP and LHP system.

d. Material Review Board (MRB) - The Contractor shall be granted MRB delegation,
a NASA/GSFC representative shall be on the MRB and have approval authority.

e. Materials Lists - The Contractor shall generate and submit the following Material
Lists as defined in Section 3.4:

13
GLAS-545-SPEC-004
REVISION A

1. Preliminary Materials and Processes List


2. Preliminary Inorganic Materials List
3. As built materials list
4. As built Inorganic Materials List

f. Qualification and Acceptance Test Plan - The Contractor shall generate and
submit a Qualification and Acceptance Test Plan to GSFC that completely
defines the tests to be performed on both the Qualification hardware and the
flight hardware. This test plan shall state the purpose of each test, including
acceptance criteria, describe in detail the test method and instrumentation, and
give the sequence of the tests. The Qualification and Acceptance Test Plan shall
be a CM controlled document that has a change record page indicating all
changes made since initial release. Once the Qualification and Acceptance Test
Plan has been approved by GSFC no changes shall be made without prior
written approval from GSFC.

g. Qualification and Acceptance Test Procedure - The Contractor shall generate


and submit a Qualification and Acceptance Test Procedure to GSFC at least two
calender weeks prior to testing of the hardware. The test procedure shall provide
step-by-step instructions for performing the test outlines by the Qualification and
Acceptance Test Plan. It shall define the environmental conditions for the tests,
the exact make and model of all the test equipment to be used, the tolerance on
all input stimuli, and limits on the output performance. The Qualification and
Acceptance Test Procedure shall be a CM controlled document that has a
change record page indicating all changes made since initial release. Once the
Qualification and Acceptance Test Procedure has been approved by GSFC no
changes shall be made without prior written approval from GSFC.

h. Acceptance Data Package - The Acceptance Data Package for each LHP
system shall be comprised of, but not limited to, the following data:

1. As-built Configuration List


2. List of Parts/Devices used in the hardware
3. List of Materials and Processes used in the hardware and Material
Certifications
4. Before and After X-ray photographs for each weld joint
5. Test Logbook including total operating time and cycle records
6. List Open Items with reasons for items being open
7. Critical Parameters Trend Data
8. Results of the all Performance Tests
9. Results of the all Mechanical Tests
10. All Mechanical Inspections

i. LHP Systems Test Report - The report shall describe the tests, inspections,
analyses, and demonstrations that were conducted to verify that the design,
hardware, and performance is qualified and acceptable in accordance with this
SOW and specification GLAS-545-SPEC-005. The report shall include all
anomalies, non-conformances, failures, and their disposition.

14
GLAS-545-SPEC-004
REVISION A
j. Malfunction Reporting/Failure Analysis Report - In the event of a failure or
malfunction of a LHP or radiator panel, the Contractor shall notify GSFC by FAX
within one (1) working day of the failure or malfunction. A written Failure
Analysis Report, including corrective action, shall be sent to GSFC within seven
(7) working days after occurrence of the failure or malfunction.

k. Non-Conformance Reports

5.3 Lot and Material Acceptance Tests

The Contractor shall inspect and conduct tests on all materials and parts used in the
fabrication and assembly of the hardware to ensure all requirements are satisfied.

5.4 Qualification Tests

The Contractor shall conduct qualification testing on non-flight hardware as defined in


specification GLAS-545-SPEC-005, the "Qualification and Acceptance Test Plan", and
the "Qualification and Acceptance Test Procedure". All non-conformances shall be
documented. A qualification test report shall be provided to GSFC for review and
approval.

5.5 Acceptance Tests

The Contractor shall conduct acceptance tests on the flight hardware as defined in
specification GLAS-545-SPEC-005, and the "Qualification and Acceptance Test
Procedure". All non-conformances shall be documented. A separate Test Report is
required for each LHP system.

6.0 Performance Assurance Requirements


6.1 General Requirements

All inspection and test reports from any test or inspection required in this document or
GLAS-545-SPEC-005 must be submitted to GSFC in the end item data packet.

6.2 Assurance Review Requirements

The Contractor shall satisfy the review requirements described in GLAS-303-REQ-001


to the full extent applicable. The Contractor shall conduct the review as stated in
Section 2.4.

6.3 Verification Requirements

The Contractor shall satisfy the verification requirements described in Document GLAS-
303-REQ-001, Appendix 3.

6.4 Materials and Process Requirements

The Contractor shall meet the requirements defined in Document GLAS-303-REQ-001,


Appendix 6.

6.5 Quality Assurance Requirements

15
GLAS-545-SPEC-004
REVISION A

The Contractor must have a quality assurance plan that satisfies the intent of ISO 9000.

7.0 Applicable Documents

The Contractor shall perform as specified herein in full accordance with the following
documents and documented references. The latest issue in effect at the time of contract
award shall apply.

GLAS-545-SPEC-005 Performance Specification for Geoscience Laser Altimeter


System Flight Loop Heat Pipes

GLAS-303-REQ-001A Mission Assurance Requirement for the Geoscience


Laser Altimeter System

8.0 Shipping

The Contractor shall pack and ship the LHP systems in a safe manner to GSFC such
that the delivered LHP system meets all of the requirements of GLAS-545-SPEC-005.

16

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi