2010 - Born in Equity PDF

16.3.
2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
BORN IN EQUITY
Men do not reject the Bible because it contradicts itself; Men reject the Bible because it contradicts
them.
stay updated via rss
Archive for 2010
A Simple Solution Possibility
Posted: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 in Born Without Money
My thoughts and ideas in the following paragraph, I believe can be used for any kind written
communication to a JURISDICTIONAL CORPORATE ENTITY, giving them notice by way of rebutting
any of their offers, wherein they are offering duties and responsibilities that you desire to have no part of,
while clearly letting the know, that you will have nothing to do with a presumption of theirs, for being
involved with their inferior trust(s). Furthermore, and if necessary, a version of this could also be utilized
in a courtroom situation. For example, when a Judge is about to sentence a PERSON to a jail/prison term,
every Judge is supposed to ask the PERSON who is about to be sentenced, “Do you have any last
words?” The key to remember is that everything a Judge says, no matter how the Judge says it, even if it
sounds like an order, it is only an offer. This means that anything he says can be refused, waived,
rebutted, and even if you wish, counter offered.
Since it is a truth that, “No man can serve two masters,” how is it that you have come to me, to
ask/request of me to be a Trustee of one of your inferior dead entity trusts? [Cestui Que Vie Trust]
“For I and My Father are One,” and I AM already a Trustee of My Father’s Trust, thee Divine
Trust, and I serve Him Only. So then, how do you expect me to serve the interest of YOUR inferior
trust, and remain in honor of both? Know ye not of what you speak… because I know, and further
I say that I do not consent to serving you as Trustee. That is your fiduciary duty Judge, and I
expect you to carry it out honorably.
So then, remember this, everything that is offered by any Judge is an offer to serve their SYSTEM in the
capacity of a Trustee for their dead entity trust(s). That Judge already knows that the defendant,
THROUGH THEIR PRESUMPTION, is the UNINFORMED beneficiary of the CESTUI QUE VIA
https://onlashuk.wordpress.com/2010/ 1/51
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
TRUST, and furthermore the Judge also knows that he actually is the proper appointed Trustee of that
Trust. However, this is not going to stop him from offering a defendant the duties and responsibilities of
Trustee.
You see, they consider you and I a beneficiary of their formed CESTUI QUE VIA TRUST(S). How is
this so? Because we have accepted benefits of THEIR SYSTEM through the NAME and NUMBER of
the beneficiary, whose NAME and NUMBER is clearly indicated on the Social Security Card. The con is
they turn this situation around to serve them through a deception, using our ignorance and voluntary
consent as a catalyst to get us to become something, and do something, that we would not do, or become
if we had proper knowledge.
Firstly, they did not inform Us that when we signed up for that Social Security Number, that we were in
actuality becoming connected to a Trust, and that the NAME and NUMBER is an identification of the
Beneficiary of that Trust, which is of THEIR inferior CESTUI QUE VIA TRUST. The worse part of this
is, they actually did not have to inform Us of this information. Yes, that is correct! Believe it or not,
when a Trust is created, the one who creates it is under no obligation to inform the beneficiaries that they
are beneficiaries. How many times have you heard about someone getting an inheritance that had no idea
they were a beneficiary? It happens all the time. I even named two of my brothers as beneficiaries to a
life insurance policy. I never told them a thing, and they never have found out, and never will until the
policy is executed properly.
Secondly, they did not tell you what the consequences might be by making use of the NAME and
NUMBER of that Social Security Card in ignorance, which could actually obligate you to performing
fiduciary duties of a Trustee for that NAME and NUMBER (this clearly constitutes non-full disclosure).
Have you ever heard of the saying, “Always read the fine print?” Believe me; I know that you would
never willingly choose to be one of their Trustee’s. So then, I also know for certain that you would not
want any trustee obligations ex-post-facto either, yes?
Thirdly, they did not inform you that they already have appointed Trustees who have already agreed to
perform the fiduciary duties for that NAME and NUMBER. This simply means that any bills that come
in the NAME of the beneficiary, who also has the NUMBER that coincides with said NAME, is to be
paid by the Trustees. You see, if you have the knowledge that there already is a Trustee to perform said
duties, then why would you even consider acting in their place? Answer… you would not! Therefore,
the whole key to their con works by not informing you, and then keeping you in a perpetual uninformed
state. So then, just by using the NAME and NUMBER of their CESTUI QUE VIA TRUST
BENEFICIARY, you become the beneficiary by the intent of your actions, which was their presumption
in the first place, which fulfilled their intent and purpose.
Now what they are doing to you as the beneficiary is offering you as a defendant the fiduciary duties of
Trustee through fines, probation, community service, and even jail time. Make no mistake about this,
these are only OFFERS! This is so the true Trustees do not have to do their honorable duty and balance
their books without you having to use your own sweat equity, energy, or staying in a “grey-bar-hotel,”
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
until the Bonds that they have created have matured. So when you enter into an agreement such as this, it
releases the Judge from having to otherwise perform his rightful duty as the appointed Trustee.
Remember, THE JUDGE IS THE TRUSTEE and THE JUDGE IS THE EXECUTOR already! You do
not need to volunteer and/or consent to doing his duties. Some Judges have even been known to say that
there are only Trustee’s and Executor’s in Prison. This is the truth because each defendant most certainly
did volunteer to fulfill the duties of Trustee and/or Executor to pay for the bonds created by them.
So then, remember that what they are doing is offering the beneficiary a benefit/privilege to SERVE
THEM thus putting the unknowing volunteer/beneficiary into a position of an unstable mind, clearly
demonstrating being of a double mind for violating, “No man can serve two masters.” They already know
that you are a Trustee of a Higher Trust… a Divine Trust and therefore cannot be a Trustee of their
inferior trust without being in violation of this truth.
The question that they are testing is if you are aware of this knowledge or not and are therefore aware of
WHO you truly are. If you are aware, then you will not allow them to offer you anything that would put
you in a “conflict of interest,” so to speak, much less even entertaining for a moment the possibility of
accepting any of their repulsive offers, because by doing this, you will be letting them know, that
everything they offer is automatically null and voided ab inito, and you will not accept anything they are
trying to give you, for you already have accepted the duties and responsibilities of, “Being about your
Father’s business.”
Trustee.
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
Trustee.
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
Trustee.
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
Trustee.
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
Who’s Your Daddy/Father and Are You Sure?
Posted: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 in Born Without Money
Whilst researching things today I ran across the word, “Guardian,” and it sparked the thoughts that I share
with all of you below.
In Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856, states:

GUARDIANS, domestic relations.
Guardians are divided into two categories,
“Guardians of the PERSON,” in the civil law called TUTORS; and,
“Guardians of the Estate,” in the same law are known by the name of curators.
Now, notice the letter of Paul written to the Galatians in chapter four (4), verses one (1) and two (2).
“Now I say, that the Heir, as long as he is a child, differeth nothing from a servant, though he be lord of
all; but is under TUTORS and governors until the time appointed of the father…”
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
Since I look at the Bible as a legal document written expressing a Trust under Trust Law, it is interesting
to note that Paul makes use of the word, “Tutor,” which is the, “Guardian of the PERSON in Civil Law.”
So then, how does a Civil Law word/definition have anything to do with Trust Law? Remember that
Trust Law is higher than Civil Law; therefore Civil Law cannot overrule or usurp Trust Law, but can and
does need and require Trust Law for its foundation. Also, and more importantly, remember who Paul was
before his name was changed, Saul of Tarsus… a, “Pharisee of the Pharisee’s,” the one who was destined
to become the Chief Priest/Pharisee which would be an Attorney General in our modern day corporate
construct. So then the question is, “What exactly is Paul actually communicating to the Galatians,
because clearly there is a meaning, however you will not find or hear that meaning preached about on,
“Any Given Sunday!” This is something that cannot be discerned through the traditions of men in the
way of reading the Bible from a doctrinal viewpoint which omits and completely ignores this fundamental
truth of the structure and purpose of the Bible. For those of you who do not see this quite yet, be
patience. The knowledge of these things will come to you when you genuinely want to know it, for truth
is one of the BIG THREE gifts of your inheritance. I promise you!
So then, the question is, “Who are these Pharisee’s?” They are the Lawyers/Attorney’s of the day. They
are the Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Ivey League educated equivalents of yesterday… they are ones who
were revealed to have knowledge, but were not using it, and were preventing others from also making use
of it. For it is written, “Woe unto you, lawyers! For ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye
entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.”
These thoughts and others, not included herein, all came after reading how the STATE, specifically the
UNITED STATES/THE STATE OF ____, views itself in relation to Us, in the following passage of
text.
“A guardian has been defined broadly as a person lawfully invested with the power, and charged with the
duty, of taking care of the person and managing the property and rights of another person, who, for some
peculiarity of state, or defect of age, understanding, or self-control, is considered incapable of
administering his own affairs. With reference to Infants, a guardian has been defined as one who legally
has the care and management of the person or the estate, or both, of a child during his minority. In the
civil law a guardian is termed a TUTOR where his guardianship relates to the person or to the person and
estate, and a curator where his guardianship relates merely to the estate.”
This follow precisely the definition stated in Bouvier’s Law Dictionary of 1856.
However, notice the second definition of the word Guardian…
“2. A guardian of the person is one who has been lawfully invested with the care of the person of an
infant, whose father is dead.”
“WHOSE FATHER IS DEAD?” (Personal Thought Interjection — Me thinks that only a dead thing can
dream up dead things.) So then, THE SYSTEM not only sees Us as being dead according to the Cestui
Que Vie Act 1666, but also our Father as being dead. So then, taking into account these things, allow me
to put this all together and give a detailed definition of what it is that I have perceived from this little
educational excursion, and perhaps reveal in a self-explanatory way what I have just shared with you.
“THE STATE, who is the Guardian of the CESTUI QUE VIA PERSON/TRUST (THEIR
CREATION), is the one who has been lawfully invested with the care of the PERSON/TRUST, but not
the infant/Living-Being itself, because THE STATE (A Dead Thing) believes the Father to be dead, and
therefore unable to take care of the PERSON/TRUST.”
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
Therefore, the original Trust/Inheritance has been probated so that THE STATE can now administrate it
as an Estate, even though it is in the form of one of THEIR CESTUI QUE VIA TRUSTS/PERSON.
You see, THE STATE could not steal directly from the inheritance in the form of a Divine Trust (The
Inheritance in its original design, intent, and will), for it was well protected, making it so that theft
could not ever happen to it, of course, unless, the Heir was convinced through a deception, supported
through the Heir’s consent into believing that He is not the Heir, which is why, “they reasoned among
themselves, saying, This is the heir: come, let us kill him, that the inheritance may be ours,” and that
“killing,” is not a physical death, but a “Civil Death,” or a death that is CONstructed on paper (Birth
Certificate, Certificate of Live Birth, Social Security Card, Death Certificate), which would then open the
door wide for THE STATE to put the inheritance into an Estate, so it could be probated, so they could
steal what they want from it.
This is all made possible because THE STATE/SYSTEM sees both the Infant/Child/Us and the Father
as being dead. Therefore a death was manifested in the minds of Men creating a construct of separation
from not only the great gift of their inheritance, but also from their intimate relationship with their Creator
and Father, thus temporarily taking the Heir’s out of their inheritance, but never permanently removing
the Heir from His inheritance, because the Divine Trust can never-ever be undone or revoked. It is in
place for all eternity! Not even through a CESTUI QUE VIA TRUST/PERSON, which is the
absolutely lowest form of Trust possible, can the Heir’s inheritance be undone or revoked. That’s right
folks! The inheritance is still there and has always been there, waiting for us to step up to the throne and,
“Sit on it,” as they used to say back in the 50’s.
Their entire SYSTEM functions on the foundation of death/mortmain and assumes that without a Living
Heir, and/or a Living Father, they must step in and do the duty of the Father, which is to administrate the
estate on His behalf, while through a presumption on their behalf, declaring the Father to be intestate,
which is actually an outright lie. The lie of death unto separation is absolutely central to their deception,
because it is through this lie which caused Us to believe that we were not Heir’s, and that we were
separated from our Creator/God/Father/Grantor, and not At-one-ment with Him. This lie is foundational
to their foreign world of deception(s), and it is also the key to the undoing of all of their
deception(s). For the very simple lie of an imaginary death, which only has existence, power, and
authority in a civil world construct, can easily be shown to be not true by ceasing to interact with the
world/The Public, through what they have created. This is where, “Rendering unto Caesar that which is
Caesar’s,” has its most important practical application, because one can clearly make it known that they
are living, because they are with Be-ing, and by the truth that they move, breath, and have blood that
flows, even in their kangaroo courts is accepted as irrefutable evidence. However, there is another way to
do this, as I said early, “A more powerful and better way.”
However, before I get to that, if they wish to keep THEIR SYSTEM functioning, which does fulfill a
needed purpose still unfortunately, because all are not ready to not be under Tutors and Governors, then
they had better never question the truth of this knowledge once the Son and Heir has made it known that
he is with this knowledge.
This is exactly what one accomplishes when they create their own Living Trust in and through the Divine
Trust and stop making use of their dead man’s CESTUI QUE VIA TRUST/PERSON. They/THE
SYSTEM will know the Father’s voice when you do this, for you and the Father are One, and when you
speak, the Father is speaking through you, for it is written, “For it is not ye that speak, but the Spirit of
your Father which speaketh in you.” for the Father no longer speaks, but is now doing all of His speaking
through His Son. This is one of the reasons why knowing who you are is so very important, for you are
the Son and Heir, and if you do not know this, then how can you accomplish this?
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
Coresource has been addressing the central core idea of correcting a mistake, and that there is not one
single mistake that cannot be corrected, and this is most certainly true! Therefore, it is my opinion that
the biggest mistake is that Man has not stepped up to the plate and corrected, is to NOTICE/INFORM
them/THE SYSTEM that we indeed are living, and therefore are with Life, which is the very first gift of
our inheritance, and we will no longer accept THEIR untruth concerning this matter. Anything else,
anything against this, is an outright lie! More than any other mistake, that any of Us has ever made, this
IS the BIG ONE that absolutely MUST be corrected.
My current line of thought for a solution to the, “BIG ONE,” which is affirmed by others, is to Create a
Living Trust under and through the Divine Trust that was originally gifted to each of Us. Through the
creation of this Trust, each one will be attesting to the truth of Us being alive simply by its very Creation,
because only a Creator can Create. So this says something about who we are and what we know about
what is happening in the world. Therefore, by that creation, we also no longer make ANY use, of ANY
of THEIR TRUST(S), their dead man’s trust, their CESTUI QUE VIA TRUST, and any sub-trusts
created through that abomination to perpetuate that deceptions further. For it was never the will and
intention of the Grantor of our Divine Trust/Inheritance to gift our dominion and rulership of that
inheritance/Divine Trust to another, who clearly is not the ruler, but is an appointed servant, warranted to
serve the Ruler of the Divine Trust and also the Living Trust(s) of the Inheritance conceived and created
by the Living Heirs.
Make no mistake about this, I want all of you to know that I believe that the greatest crime ever conceived
of and perpetrated upon Man is that of DEATH… no matter what form it is conceived through, for death
has nothing to do with Us and the Love that we have been purposed OF; and furthermore, the most
unconscionable presumption of that death ever, is that of inferring that the Father/Creator/Grantor/One-
Supreme-Being is dead. For if this were even possible, those that would deceive others into such a lie,
and play their con of that lie, are the most, “reprehensible-cantankerous-pious-pukers,” present in this
living creation. (In short, they are the most ungrateful of all the living.)
Such ungratefulness is of the most extreme negative nature, because they would not have the life they are
living to be able to perpetrate such a unthinkable and mindless thing of their own power, for they are not
Creators much less co-creators. Therefore, a clear pronouncement must also be made to pronounce unto
them that would lie in such a fashion that we, the Living, are with the Knowledge of Knowing that they
have lied this lie to convince the Heir that He is not the Heir, and through that lie, that His Father is not
His Father, and through that lie, that his destiny is death; and furthermore, let it also be made known in all
the Creation that the STATE and/or any FICTIONAL CONSTRUCT/CORPORATION/ENTITY has
never been the Father, nor could it ever be the Father. THE STATE is not Spirit and has no Spirit and
never will be a partaker of the Spirit, for it does not live, neither can it live, therefore THE STATE has no
rights and no Life. THE STATE simply is a fiction bound to serve only in silence and shall henceforth be
silent as it is intended to be, therefore, all minions attempting to give voice to a FICTION such as THE
UNITED STATES, THE STATE OF ______, etc., shall also be attesting their ungratefulness, and shall
likewise be silenced for the sake of grace unto mercy. Therefore, for as it is written, I call, “no man
Father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven,” which is IN ME. So then, I can assure
you completely that I do not call THE STATE Father for, “When you have seen me, you have seen the
Father,” “For I and My Father are One,” therefore, I AM Life Gifting Living Spirit; and furthermore, is it
not written in your law, “I said, ye are gods?” “And if he called them gods, unto whom the word of God
came, and the Scripture cannot be broken; what do you say of me, whom the Father has sanctified, and
sent into the world?” “THOU BLASPHEMEST?” Simply because I said, “I AM the Son of God?”
Simply because I have pronounced that I AM the Heir?
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
Now is the time to being putting things in order. To give true meaning to, “Acceptance for Value,” but not
in the since of the occult world of commerce, but to Honor our Father and our Mother appropriately for
the Love and the Life that they nurture in and through Us each and every moment. We are well on our
way to accomplishing these goals and that finish line is in view!
<!–[if !mso]> <! st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } –>

16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
text.
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
them/THE SYSTEM

16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
text.
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY

16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
text.
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
that we indeed are living, and therefore are with Life, which is the very first gift of our inheritance, and
we will no longer accept THEIR untruth concerning this matter. Anything else, anything against this, is
an outright lie! More than any other mistake, that any of Us has ever made, this IS the BIG ONE that
absolutely MUST be corrected.
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
We Contract Because We Do Not Trust
Posted: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 in THE GIFT OF MY EPISTLE

The article I have authored below was inspired after reading one of Victor Beck’s recent postings. I take
parts of what he wrote verbatim and springboard off that into the thoughts I have shared herein, along
with the asking of many questions to encourage and stimulate the thinking process. However, be
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
forewarned, thinking two dimensionally, which is inside the box, about this topic may inspire a strong
emotional response. Even a negative disposition if one takes this personally. So then, I encourage you to
think outside of the box, and as I say, “See things as they are; NOT as they appear to be,” and see how
contracts are everywhere and what they are doing to Us as a whole, and resolve to dissolution contracts so
that Trust can once again be asserted, and through Trust… Love… because I believe that Giving,
Forgiving, and Trust are the three main fulcrum points through which Love flows, and this is why Trust
displacing contracts is so very important.
I have known people who lived together for years and were happy. Shortly after doing the legal  wedding
ceremony, the relationship fell apart. [Likewise, I also have known of the same unfortunately. To me,
this explains why so many people are much happier when dating, or is happier as singles before the
marriage contract enters into the relationship, and changes the relationship, because believe-it-or-not, it
does. It has a profound effect. Now you know why I have never married, for I have never found a
companion-friend-mate who knows and feels the same way about this issue as I do. They have all wanted
the contract! Even now, one who is close to me wants that very thing, but does not know what it is that
she is requiring.]
Why do people need or believe that they must get a contract? Is it possible that the real reason why the
relationship failed is that they entered into a contract, promising to love one another; thus, through the
forming of a contractual obligation requiring love, displaced unconditional love and trust with the
contractual obligation, saying in and by that action, “I do not  trust you,” and that, “I require a contract to
bind you because of this distrust?”
When a marriage contract is formed, the two submitting themselves under that contract, “promise to love,
honor, and obey till death do they part,” do they not? So then, if one parts from that contractual
obligation formed through the contractual relationship, does not the love of the relationship prior to the
formation of the contract go out the  window, if it ever actually was a part of the relationship in the first
place? Does this actually mean that the love was conditional even during the dating and courting period?
Unfortunately, it would appear so.
Are not contracts made up of stipulated requirements and conditions? Have you ever heard of the phrase,
“Unconditional Love?” Then how is it possible for love to be a stipulated contractual requirement or
condition, such as under a marriage license/contract?
Do you really believe that you can contractually bind love without compromising it? If you do believe
this, are you actually saying that love without any contractual obligations, or performance requirements,
is impossible? Do you really believe that? The day that love requires a contract for it to be what it is; is
the day we are all “contractually doomed!” Thank goodness, we shall never see that day.
Therefore, has it become very clear that in order for trust and love to be pure and remain pure,
unobstructed, and unmolested, nothing must be allowed to displace and remove “The Trust” and
therefore “The Love,” especially any kind of contractual requirements and/or obligations? Do you
now see how entering into contracts displaces trust and love?
POST #01 – INTRODUCTION – THE GIFT OF

ONLASHUK’S EPISTLE
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
Posted: Saturday, October 9, 2010 in THE GIFT OF MY EPISTLE
THE GIFT OF ONLASHUK’S EPISTLE
INTRODUCTION
Here is all the information and data on the Executor Letter that
is current. Attached you find a copy of the Executor Letter and
a version that is used for the Wife’s-Estate (Executrix).
However, this template does not have any of the data and
information that, “The Private Group,” has put together for the
informing of the Registrar’s concerning their trespass,
administration, and transfer of the Estate into an ESTATE,
thereby probating the account. This can be looked at more
closely by Us together on a Skype Conference Call sometime in
the future wherein we can discuss, brainstorm, and connect-
the-dots, but remember this… this is your letter, so I will be
hosting the conference call and advising on the letter, not
composing it. You guys can brainstorm the letter. This will give
me the chance to pass on what it is that I have learned, and
also test it through your questions and observation. This will
also give you the chance to help me see things from a fresh
perspective. The way I see it, that makes this a win-win
situation. Each one of you must go within and listen to your
heart, and put into this letter the things of which you are certain
of, and wish to convey. Therefore, gather, study, and share
your thoughts with one another in prayer, and you will
accomplish this quite easily. Happy educational learning
journey! Enjoy the moments!
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF BEING HERE? (I DARE

YOU – THE CHALLENGE)
Posted: Saturday, October 9, 2010 in Born Without Money, What Do I Believe and Why
You were born into this world to learn how to be the ruler of it. You do not have to earn the position or
title, but you do have to show that you are ready to handle the responsibility of it. There is a difference,
because your destiny was determined before the foundation of this world was laid, and you agreed to it,
which is why you are here in the first place. Otherwise, you would not be.
So then, to help you figure this out, a SYSTEM was developed to help you see the difference between two
diametrically opposite extremes. These extremes are often refereed to as, “Good and Evil.” Through all
the ups and downs of life, we each learn and are molded by our experiences with events and
circumstances that help us to form our thoughts, opinions, and ideas about life and who we are, or, who
we think we are.
All of these situations are designed to do is to help you remember who you are and then to help you
decide to BE who you are, because you have already been given everything that you need to BE who you
have already agreed to be. It simply comes down to recognizing that truth and then learning how to
access it. But one must first know who they are before they can effectively claim and take their rightful
place as a ruler of this dominion.
The financial system is the basis of how all the testing is done. Unfortunately, the vast overwhelming
populous of the world is absolutely clueless about how it works, and more importantly, what it reveals
about them, this world, and how to live in it peacefully. When you learn how THE SYSTEM works, you
will be, “Master of this worlds system, and no longer mastered by this worlds system.” That is IF you
choose to learn anything about it in the first place.
Contrary to the popular belief that, “Ignorance is bliss,” I say unto you that, “Ignorance is blinding.” You
can never be who you have already agreed to be before the foundation of this world was laid, in the
blindness of ignorance thinking or believing that it is bliss. Once one reaches the conclusion of such
childishness, you will embark upon a fulfilling life of enjoyment without all the panic, fear, and worry
that comes from not being in control. You the uncommonly known truth is, “You actually are in control,”
but you have only believed differently, and when you realize that you do have control over everything that
has taken place in the life that you are living, everything that takes place in your life and the sphere of
your influence will dramatically change for the positive!
Most people believe that they do not have any control over anything, and this is perhaps one of the
reasons why so many negative things happen to them. When you stop believing that you have little to no
control of things that take place in your life, and you actually determine to change your mind and
challenge that very notion, you will find out just how much control you really do have, and have always
had! This truth scares the hell out of a lot of people, because they want to enjoy their ignorance, however,
they have not truly begun to really live life, much less enjoy it, because while they abide in their
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
ignorance, and just because of this they cannot enjoy it, even though they may fool themselves into
believing that they do, which is one of the tests of THE SYSTEM. How not to fool ones self with their
imaginary folly.
Everything in this world functions through the financial system. EVERYTHING! Learn about it. Master
it and do not continue to be mastered by it! When you can accomplish this, you will be recognized as
being a Ruler in this Dominion. Until then, you are a slave under Governors and Tutors in need of
guidance and care, because you have not taken upon yourself the belief that you can do these things and
more of your own volition.
My writings in this blog are all based upon this and how to achieve this. You may not exactly do it the
way that I have, and you do not have to, but if you chose to walk a similar walk, then you will be as free
as I AM, and recognized by THE SYSTEM to be an Heir of the Trust given unto all before the foundation
of this world was laid, which is evidenced on your CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH, both from the
County of your Nativity, as well as the State of your Nativity, but the RED BONDING number on one or
both certified copies. Furthermore, this is also reflected at the national level by the either the red or blue
numbers on the back of the Social Security Card.
You do not believe this? Well then, here is your first challenge/test. Go to your bank and take the Social
Security Card with you, along with Certified copies of your Certificates of Live Birth, and ask them what
that number means. Go ahead! Do it! I dare you! And if they do not know, or cannot tell you, then ask
them who can tell you, or ask them to speak to a, “Private Banker,” about it. Then ask that Private Banker
if he knows what to do with a 144A Security. Come on now, you do not really believe that they put that
number on there for decoration only now do you? LEARN what they are for, what they mean, and what
you need to do about them.
Once you have accomplished this, you will be recognized properly and thereby have no bothers, no
worries, and no concerns for any of the necessary things of living life, for they have already been
provided for. You just have to believe that they have been, and determine that you are going to live and
manifest that ruth, which will be most difficult for the vast majority of you because of all the, “brain-
training-indoctrination,” that you suffer from.
Be warned, this path is only for the brave and courageous… are you?
IRS SOLUTION FOR THE FAITHFUL
Posted: Friday, October 1, 2010 in Born Without Money
In a recent communication that I have had ongoing with somebody on an IRS issue, I gave to him about
what I would do in the same circumstances. This is not necessarily what they did, or what you might/may
do. However, I thought this to be a good opportunity to write out my thoughts on the topic and give
others the chance to ponder and consider, (“Think,” for those of you in Rio-Linda California) of how they
would deal with just such a situation. As Captain Spock said to Admiral James T. Kirk, when speaking
about his new crew of fresh cadets handling a potential rough situation in Star Trek-2, Wrath of Kahn, he
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
said, “Each to their own gifts.” So know this, there is no right way, or wrong way, because you can
always-always-always… correct a mistake. (Did I say always? :-P) Therefore, as Yoda said to Luke
concerning the raising his X-Wing Fighter out of the swamp, “Do or Do Not… there is no try.” (It is also
interesting to point out that in this scene, there is what sounds like an Eagle Cry as Yoda is saying this.
Things that make ya go, “Hmm!”)
Firstly, you set the tone of how this going to be handled by what you DO! “Be not a hearer only, but a
doer of the Word.” So then, in faith live your life knowing that you have already been, “given everything
that you need for life and godliness,” therefore, the abundance that you seek access to is present NOW!
Therefore, in the Spirit of, “Agree with thine adversary quickly,” because this avoids all controversy, and
we know that just as when one pleads, “Not Guilty,” to any “so-called crime,” they have created a
controversy, which actually means that you are in fact guilty because you are not there to settle the matter
peacefully. However, as peaceful inhabitants, who are non-adversarial, and non-controversial, we want to
take all the necessary steps to avoid such a foolish and ignorant trespass.
Therefore, concerning the petitioner’s solicitation letter from the IRS, because that is exactly what it is, a
solicitation for a donation/gift, asking why you have not filed a GIFT FORM (1040x, 1099x, W-2,
ETC.) with them over the past year(s). The answer is very simple. GIVE back to them that which they
have brought before you, thus “DOING” one practical application of, “…render unto Caesar that which is
Caesar’s.” As I stated above, “you agree with them/enemy/adversary FIRST,” thereby avoiding all
controversy before it has a chance to start. YOU MUST AGREE FIRST, and if you know who you
are, then you know why this is so important. Do not fear or fret, for this will not hurt you, but rather
open the door of solution unto resolution, and is this not what you seek?
Second, with all controversy settled, now you can question how such a matter applies to you; and, where
they get their so-called power and authority from to bring such an issue before you. There are numerous
ways of approaching this. Here is a couple…
How is it that you are obligated to pay or perform under THEIR laws/statutes/codes?
How does THEIR law [color of law = statutes/codes] apply to you?
Where did they get the idea that you gave them permission to bind you into any kind of contract
without full disclosure and the giving of your explicit expressed consent?
By what power and authority do you draw a connection between a living Be-ing/Soul/Me, and that
which is on paper? (Maxim of Law)
How did you become the Administrator of this account/estate without the expressed written
appointment of the Executor/Executrix?
Did the Executor/Executrix relinquish this account unto probate?
Therefore, why do you bring this issue before me?
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
Thirdly, you can now lay it on thick by EXPRESSING/announcing/informing them of your TRUE
WILL and INTENT which will rebut all of their frivolous presumptions that they have revealed they are
operating by. Do you see?! This is not a negative, but in all truth is actually an opportunity! So take
advantage of it and sink their battleship!
In writing to them, you might want to consider expressing something along this line of thought… “Yes, I
did not file as YOU call it a, “tax return,”/[gift form], however more importantly, I have not seen how it is
that you have concluded that I am a PERSON required to file; where is your evidence to this matter?
Therefore, unless you can prove that I am a PERSON, and therefore required to file, there is no further
need to send me any such requests for gifts, yes? Furthermore, since it is true that the W-2 is the return
form of which you seek, has this not already been returned unto you by the CORPORATION/PERSON
who is responsible for such an action? Again, how does this have anything to do with me? How is this
any of my concern?
HENCEFORTH and THEREFORE, I hereby am formally announcing and informing you that it was
NEVER MY WILL AND INTENT to gift to you the energy of my labor in any such way, shape, or
form, and that any previous alleged gift was a mistake made under duress and coercion through fear;
AND FURTHERMORE, I hereby command and order YOU to return ALL of that which you have
received from me immediately for you have revealed yourself to be an, “Unjust steward [Trustee],” no
longer in honor making proper use of the estate/E-state/account, for Acts of War; AND
FURTHERMORE, you will also make any and all corrections to your files/records (both public and
private) to reflect this change, and show honorably my TRUE WILL AND INTENT as I have
“EXPRESSED,” herein; Resistance is futile, you must comply. Failure is not an option!
So then, take the thoughts that I have shared with you above and communicate with them in some fashion,
but USE YOUR OWN WORDS, because you may need to give another response/reply, and if what is
written does not come from your heart, that failure will be exposed. I encourage you to EXPRESS
YOURSELF and do it honorably. Furthermore, do not let this go unanswered because, “silence is
considered acquiescence.” You have an opportunity here to express the trust and correct their
assumption(s) in one very powerful way. Take advantage of this opportunity and do not bypass it!
Remember, they are the Trustee’s, for they work in the Public and must do everything that they do by
the/their book; THEIR statutes and codes, which of course do not apply to you, and never will without
YOUR expressed explicit consent. Remember, you are not a Trustee, because you have no oath of office,
and you are not working in the Public, or for the Public, but are going about the daily living of your life
privately and wish not to be bother by those who are of the mindset of, “…when the husbandmen saw
the Son, they said among themselves, This is the Heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his
inheritance.” You are the Heir, and the only one who can lawfully claim Executor over the estate given
unto you the day you were born, for this is the WILL AND INTENT of the Testator, which can never
be undone. They, the Government, Public Trustee’s, CORPORATIONS/PERSONS must follow your
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
instructions because of whom you are, especially because of you KNOWING who you are. So then, learn
about what the Executor/Executrix Office is, and what you can do THROUGH it. Believe this and live
this out faithfully, for you were never meant to be an, “alien(s) and tenant(s),” in and upon the
inheritance given unto thee, and through this you will exemplify, “Wherefore thou are no more a servant,
but a Son; and if a Son, then an Heir of God through Christ.”
<!–[if !mso]>
others the chance to ponder and consider, (“Think,” for those of you in Rio-Linda California) of how the
concerning raising his X-Wing Fighter out of the swamp, “Do or Do Not… there is no try.” (It is also
interesting to point out that in this scene, there is what sounds like an Eagle Cry as Yoda is saying this,
things that make ya go, “Hmm!”)
y would deal with just such a situation. As Captain Spock said to Admiral James T. Kirk, when speaking
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
Know Thyself, “Human,” -or- “Man”
Posted: Thursday, July 29, 2010 in What Do I Believe and Why

Are you certain that you want to use the word, “Human,” when referring to the Sons of the Living God?
(Man) I believe that you are aware of this, however for the sake of sharing of my thoughts on this matter,
we know that God created Man in his image and likeness, and that image and likeness is BOTH, “Male
and Female,” no exceptions. So then, since Man, the Sons and Heirs of the Living God, is the image and
likeness of God both male and female, and since Man both Male and Female is the determined and
declared ruler of His dominion (Genesis 1: 26-28), where did this “human,” come from?
Broken down the word, “human,” becomes, “Hu,” or, “Hue” and “Man.” The definition for the word,
“hue,” is of course “color.” Specifically, “A particular gradation of color; a shade or tint.” However, the
interesting definition is the 4th one, “APPEARANCE; aspect: a man of somber hue.”
When someone is invited to visit the corporate world they are asked to make the NAME APPEAR,
correct? Why do they ask for the NAME to APPEAR? Because they are looking for the Living Man who
is the Son and Heir of the Living God, to become the surety to any charges that are charged up against the
NAME, and if one plays “THEIR,” game, then they become associated with that NAME through
APPEARANCE, which is through a false identity. So then, “human,” is to APPEAR to be Man, but is
not truly Man at all, but is only an APPEARANCE of the real through a FICTIONAL and color-able
façade. Therefore, to APPEAR in HUMAN form, is to appear in an alien and foreign identification, and
therefore be subject unto the jurisdiction of the rules, laws, and regulations of the egos that rule such
things.
This foreign jurisdiction only recognizes its IDENTIFICATION of NAMES and not, “the Man created in
the image and likeness of God both male and female.” Does, “Human = Man?” I say that, “Human <>
Man.” Therefore, human is, “color-of-man,” as in, “color-of-law.” And I think you are aware that
anything which is, “color-able,” is for the purpose of a, “cover-up,” and is not truly what it APPEARS to
be.
On another thought, how is it that the prefix, “Hu,” or, “Hue,” precedes Man? When did that happen?
How did that happen? Furthermore, “Is it necessary to redefine that which was already determined and
defined before the foundation of this world was laid?” The answer that came to me is, “Only for the
purpose of deception.” So then, it APPEARS that, “hu-man,” is a “cover-up,” for Man employed as a
distraction to keep the sexes divided and therefore to perpetuate a feeling of being separate from opposite
sex and not that of Be-ing One.
What Is Man That You Need To Be Aware Of
Posted: Thursday, July 29, 2010 in What Do I Believe and Why
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
What is Man? Unlike the standard acceptable uses of the day, I have a completely different perspective
for the answer to this question. You see, because of the, “political correctness corruption,” which has
invaded the minds of men, “Man,” is viewed as only being, “male,” and, “Woman,” is viewed as only
being, “female.” But I say to you that Man is both male and female! Likewise, woman is also both male
and female!
Now how did I come to this conclusion? When God created Man, he created Man in His image and
likeness BOTH male and female, and my conclusion comes from this very simple and straight forward
statement. God did not create Man male and Woman female. There is nothing there that indicates this. It
is quite plain that Man was created to be both male and female. So then, if you are a male, then I see you
as being, “Man create in the image and likeness of God, male.” Likewise, if you are female, then I see
you as being, “Man created in the image and likeness of God, female.” Moreover, any opinion that is
against this very simple truth is no doubt a corruption, and its only purpose is to distract and divide
thereby keeping the sexes opposed to each other rather than seeing that they truly are One.
Furthermore, since the origin of Woman came not only AFTER Man, but also out from Man, Woman has
to also be both Male and Female. So then, if Man was never created then Woman could never have come
out of Man. Therefore, since Man is both male and female, then the logical and sensible conclusion is
that Woman is also both male and female. Perhaps this is another meaning for the verse, “Come out of
her my people that you partake no more of her sins,” and through those sins be in bondage to the laws
of men, through a false identity. However, perhaps in this case the meaning is to, “cease and desist,” from
abiding in the false identification of Wo-man/Woe-unto-Man, which came after Man, and is therefore an
inferior/false identity, and return to the true identity of Man who is the Son and Heir of the Living God,
as He was determined and declared to be before the foundation this world was laid.
What is Man? Unlike the standard acceptable uses of the day, I have a completely different perspective
for the answer to this question. You see, because of the, “political correctness corruption,” which has
invaded the minds of men, “Man,” is viewed as only being, “male,” and, “Woman,” is viewed as only
being, “female.” But I say that Man is both male and female! Likewise, woman is also both male and
female!
Now how did I come to this conclusion? When God created Man, he created Man in His image and
likeness BOTH male and female, and it is as simple as that. Any opinion that is against this very simple
truth is a corruption, and its only purpose is to distract and divide thereby keeping the sexes opposed to
each other rather than seeing that they truly are One.
Furthermore, since Woman came out from Man, Woman has to also be both Male and Female, because if
Man were never created then Woman could never have come out of Man, and since Man is both male and
female, then the logical and sensible conclusion is that Woman is also both male and female.
Erica Goldon Speaks Out Giving An AWESOME

Graduation Speech
Posted: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 in Born Without Money
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
Erica Goldon the valedictorian of the 2010

Coxsckie-Athens High School class, speaks out
exposing the purpose and the function of the
public school system, and it’s failure, in her
graduation speech.
Last month, the very brave and bold, “Erica Goldson,” graduated as valedictorian of Coxsackie-Athens
High School 2010. However, instead of giving the standard and expected type of graduation speech to
celebrate the triumph of her victory over the previous 13-years of “education,” and thanking the teachers
that made it happen, she channeled her inner Ivan Illich (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Illich) (an
Austrian philosopher, Roman Catholic Priest and critic of the institutions of contemporary western
culture and their effects on the provenance and practice of education, medicine, work, energy use, and
economic development.) and de-constructed the logic of a valedictorian and the whole educational
system. Her speech most surely shocked and made a few people fall out of their seats.
This is an absolute excellent speech given by Erica! I say, “Well done,” and, “Thank You Erica for being
the Brave and Bold Spirit that you are!” Your timing for the delivery of this message was perfect. I Am
proud of you! It is my hope by re-posting this speech to my blog, that it will also be a blessing and
inspiration to those who take the time to read it. I thank you for the opportunity to re-post it. I hope for
those that have need, they will take close notice to the things that you spoke, revealing a known truth that
so very few have allowed themselves to become aware of, much less actually engage in anything peaceful
to spark and inspire necessary changes.
The needed changes I personally believe start with the example that Immanuel/JESUS demonstrated by
turning over the tables of the, “Money Changers,” or the modern-day TITLE of BANKERS. It is well
past the time for Man, the Sons and Heirs of the Living God, to actively rule the dominion that was given
to them, and stop allowing the BANKERS to rule through their privately controlled monetary and
financial system.
————————————————————————————————
Here I Stand
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
There is a story of a young, but earnest Zen student who approached his teacher, and asked the Master, “If
I work very hard and diligently, how long will it take for me to find Zen?” The Master thought about this
and then replied, “Ten years…” The student then said, “But what if I work very hard and really apply
myself to learn fast — How long will it take then?” The Master replied, “Well, twenty years.” “But, if I
really, really work hard at it, how long will it take then?” asked the student. “Thirty years,” replied the
Master. “But, I do not understand,” said the disappointed student. “At each time that I say I will work
harder and put more effort into the learning, you say it will take me longer. Why do you say that?” The
Master replied, “When you have one eye on the goal, you only have one eye on the path.”
This is the dilemma I have faced within the American education system. We are so focused on a goal,
whether it be passing a test, or graduating as first in the class. However, in this way, we do not really
learn. We do whatever it takes to achieve our original objective.
Some of you may be thinking, “Well, if you pass a test, or become valedictorian, didn’t you learn
something? Well, yes, you learned something, but as the Master pointed out, not all that you could have.
Perhaps, you only learned how to memorize names, places, and dates only to forget them in order to clear
your mind for the next test. School is not all that it can be! Right now, it is a place for most people to
determine that their goal is to get out as soon as possible.
I am now accomplishing that goal. I am graduating. I should look at this as a positive experience,
especially being at the top of my class. However, in retrospect, I cannot say that I am any more intelligent
than my peers are. I can attest that I am only the best at doing what I am told and working the system.
Yet, here I stand, and I am supposed to be proud that I have completed this period of
indoctrination. I will leave in the fall to go on to the next phase expected of me, in order to receive a
paper document that certifies that I am capable of work. But I contest that I am a human being, a thinker,
an adventurer – not a worker. A worker is someone who is trapped within repetition – a slave of the
system set up before him. But now, I have successfully shown that I was the best slave. I did what I
was told to the extreme. While others sat in class and doodled to later become great artists, I sat in class
to take notes and become a great test-taker. While others would come to class without their homework
done because they were reading about an interest of theirs, I never missed an assignment. While others
were creating music and writing lyrics, I decided to do extra credit, even though I never needed it. So, I
wonder, why did I even want this position? Sure, I earned it, but what will come of it? When I leave
educational institutionalism, will I be successful or forever lost? I have no clue about what I want to do
with my life; I have no interests because I saw every subject of study as work, and I excelled at every
subject just for the purpose of excelling, not learning. And quite frankly, now I’m scared.
John Taylor Gatto, a retired school teacher and activist critical of compulsory schooling, asserts, “We
could encourage the best qualities of youthfulness – curiosity, adventure, resilience, the capacity for
surprising insight simply by being more flexible about time, texts, and tests, by introducing kids into truly
competent adults, and by giving each student what autonomy he or she needs in order to take a risk every
now and then. But we don’t do that.“ Between these cinderblock walls, we are all expected to be the
same. We are trained to ace every standardized test, and those who deviate and see light through a
different lens are worthless to the scheme of public education, and therefore viewed with contempt.
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
H. L. Mencken wrote in ‘The American Mercury,’ for April 1924 that the aim of public education is not,
“…to fill the young of the species with knowledge and awaken their intelligence. … Nothing could be
further from the truth. The aim … is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe
level, to breed and train a standardized citizenry, to put down dissent and originality. That is its aim in the
United States.”
To illustrate this idea, doesn’t it perturb you to learn about the idea of, “critical thinking.” Is there really
such a thing as, “uncritically thinking?” To think is to process information in order to form an opinion.
But if we are not critical when processing this information, are we really thinking? Or are we mindlessly
accepting other opinions as truth?
This was happening to me, and if it wasn’t for the rare occurrence of an avant-garde tenth grade English
teacher, Donna Bryan, who allowed me to open my mind and ask questions before accepting, “textbook
doctrine,” I would have been doomed. I am now enlightened, but my mind still feels disabled. I must
retrain myself and constantly remember how insane this ostensibly sane place really is.
And now, “Here I Stand,” in a world guided by fear, a world suppressing the uniqueness that lies
inside each of us, a world where we can either acquiesce to the inhuman nonsense of corporatism
and materialism or insist on change. We are not enlivened by an educational system that clandestinely
sets us up for jobs that could be automated, for work that need not be done, for enslavement without
fervency for meaningful achievement. We have no choices in life when money is our motivational force.
Our motivational force ought to be passion, but this is lost from the moment we step into a system that
trains us, rather than inspires us.
We are more than robotic bookshelves, conditioned to blurt out facts we were taught in school. We are all
very special, every human on this planet is so special, so aren’t we all deserving of something better, of
using our minds for innovation, rather than memorization, for creativity, rather than futile activity, for
rumination rather than stagnation? We are not here to get a degree, to then get a job, so we can consume
industry-approved placation after placation. There is more, and more still.
The saddest part is that the majority of students do not have the opportunity to reflect as I did. The
majority of students are put through the same brainwashing techniques in order to create a complacent
labor force working in the interests of large corporations and secretive government, and worst of all; they
are completely unaware of it. I will never be able to turn back these 18 years. I cannot run away to
another country with an education system meant to enlighten rather than condition. This part of my life is
over, and I want to make sure that no other child will have his or her potential suppressed by powers
meant to exploit and control. We are human beings. We are thinkers, dreamers, explorers, artists, writers,
engineers. We are anything we want to be – but only if we have an educational system that supports us
rather than holds us down. A tree can grow, but only if its roots are given a healthy foundation.
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
For those of you out there that must continue to sit in desks and yield to the authoritarian ideologies of
instructors, do not be disheartened. You still have the opportunity to stand up, ask questions, be critical,
and create your own perspective. Demand a setting that will provide you with intellectual
capabilities that allow you to expand your mind instead of directing it. Demand that you be
interested in class. Demand that the excuse, “You have to learn this for the test” is not good enough
for you. Education is an excellent tool, if used properly, but focuses more on learning rather than getting
good grades.
For those of you that work within the system that I am condemning, I do not mean to insult; I intend to
motivate. You have the power to change the incompetence of this system. I know that you did not
become a teacher or administrator to see your students bored. You cannot accept the authority of the
governing bodies that tell you what to teach, how to teach it, and that you will be punished if you do not
comply. Our potential is at stake.
For those of you that are now leaving this establishment, I say, do not forget what went on in these
classrooms. Do not abandon those that come after you. We are the new future and we are not going to let
tradition stand. We will break down the walls of corruption to let a garden of knowledge grow throughout
America. Once educated properly, we will have the power to do anything, and best of all, we will only
use that power for good, for we will be cultivated and wise. We will not accept anything at face value.
We will ask questions, and we will demand truth.
So, “Here I Stand.” I am not standing here as valedictorian by myself. I was molded by my
environment, by all of my peers who are sitting here watching me. I could not have accomplished this
without all of you. It was all of you who truly made me the person I am today. It was all of you who
were my competition, yet my backbone. In that way, we are all valedictorians.
I am now supposed to say farewell to this institution, to those who maintain it, and to those who stand
with me and behind me, but I hope this farewell is more of a, “see you later,” when we are all working
together to rear a pedagogic movement. But first, let’s go get those pieces of paper that tell us that we’re
smart enough to do so!
Here I Stand
There is a story of a young, but earnest Zen student who approached his teacher, and asked the Master, “If
I work very hard and diligently, how long will it take for me to find Zen?” The Master thought about this
and then replied, “Ten years…” The student then said, “But what if I work very hard and really apply
myself to learn fast — How long will it take then?” The Master replied, “Well, twenty years.” “But, if I
really, really work hard at it, how long will it take then?” asked the student. “Thirty years,” replied the
Master. “But, I do not understand,” said the disappointed student. “At each time that I say I will work
harder and put more effort into the learning, you say it will take me longer. Why do you say that?” The
Master replied, “When you have one eye on the goal, you only have one eye on the path.”
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
This is the dilemma I have faced within the American education system. We are so focused on a goal,
whether it be passing a test, or graduating as first in the class. However, in this way, we do not really
learn. We do whatever it takes to achieve our original objective.
Some of you may be thinking, “Well, if you pass a test, or become valedictorian, didn’t you learn
something? Well, yes, you learned something, but as the Master pointed out, not all that you could have.
Perhaps, you only learned how to memorize names, places, and dates only to forget them in order to clear
your mind for the next test. School is not all that it can be! Right now, it is a place for most people to
determine that their goal is to get out as soon as possible.
I am now accomplishing that goal. I am graduating. I should look at this as a positive experience,
especially being at the top of my class. However, in retrospect, I cannot say that I am any more intelligent
than my peers are. I can attest that I am only the best at doing what I am told and working the system.
Yet, here I stand, and I am supposed to be proud that I have completed this period of
indoctrination. I will leave in the fall to go on to the next phase expected of me, in order to receive a
paper document that certifies that I am capable of work. But I contest that I am a human being, a thinker,
an adventurer – not a worker. A worker is someone who is trapped within repetition – a slave of the
system set up before him. But now, I have successfully shown that I was the best slave. I did what I
was told to the extreme. While others sat in class and doodled to later become great artists, I sat in class
to take notes and become a great test-taker. While others would come to class without their homework
done because they were reading about an interest of theirs, I never missed an assignment. While others
were creating music and writing lyrics, I decided to do extra credit, even though I never needed it. So, I
wonder, why did I even want this position? Sure, I earned it, but what will come of it? When I leave
educational institutionalism, will I be successful or forever lost? I have no clue about what I want to do
with my life; I have no interests because I saw every subject of study as work, and I excelled at every
subject just for the purpose of excelling, not learning. And quite frankly, now I’m scared.
John Taylor Gatto, a retired school teacher and activist critical of compulsory schooling, asserts, “We
could encourage the best qualities of youthfulness – curiosity, adventure, resilience, the capacity for
surprising insight simply by being more flexible about time, texts, and tests, by introducing kids into truly
competent adults, and by giving each student what autonomy he or she needs in order to take a risk every
now and then. But we don’t do that.“ Between these cinderblock walls, we are all expected to be the
same. We are trained to ace every standardized test, and those who deviate and see light through a
different lens are worthless to the scheme of public education, and therefore viewed with contempt.
H. L. Mencken wrote in ‘The American Mercury,’ for April 1924 that the aim of public education is not,
“…to fill the young of the species with knowledge and awaken their intelligence. … Nothing could be
further from the truth. The aim … is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe
level, to breed and train a standardized citizenry, to put down dissent and originality. That is its aim in the
United States.”
To illustrate this idea, doesn’t it perturb you to learn about the idea of, “critical thinking.” Is there really
such a thing as, “uncritically thinking?” To think is to process information in order to form an opinion.
But if we are not critical when processing this information, are we really thinking? Or are we mindlessly
accepting other opinions as truth?
This was happening to me, and if it wasn’t for the rare occurrence of an avant-garde tenth grade English
teacher, Donna Bryan, who allowed me to open my mind and ask questions before accepting, “textbook
doctrine,” I would have been doomed. I am now enlightened, but my mind still feels disabled. I must
retrain myself and constantly remember how insane this ostensibly sane place really is.
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
And now here I am in a world guided by fear, a world suppressing the uniqueness that lies inside
each of us, a world where we can either acquiesce to the inhuman nonsense of corporatism and
materialism or insist on change. We are not enlivened by an educational system that clandestinely sets
us up for jobs that could be automated, for work that need not be done, for enslavement without fervency
for meaningful achievement. We have no choices in life when money is our motivational force. Our
motivational force ought to be passion, but this is lost from the moment we step into a system that trains
us, rather than inspires us.
We are more than robotic bookshelves, conditioned to blurt out facts we were taught in school. We are all
very special, every human on this planet is so special, so aren’t we all deserving of something better, of
using our minds for innovation, rather than memorization, for creativity, rather than futile activity, for
rumination rather than stagnation? We are not here to get a degree, to then get a job, so we can consume
industry-approved placation after placation. There is more, and more still.
The saddest part is that the majority of students do not have the opportunity to reflect as I did. The
majority of students are put through the same brainwashing techniques in order to create a complacent
labor force working in the interests of large corporations and secretive government, and worst of all; they
are completely unaware of it. I will never be able to turn back these 18 years. I cannot run away to
another country with an education system meant to enlighten rather than condition. This part of my life is
over, and I want to make sure that no other child will have his or her potential suppressed by powers
meant to exploit and control. We are human beings. We are thinkers, dreamers, explorers, artists, writers,
engineers. We are anything we want to be – but only if we have an educational system that supports us
rather than holds us down. A tree can grow, but only if its roots are given a healthy foundation.
For those of you out there that must continue to sit in desks and yield to the authoritarian ideologies of
instructors, do not be disheartened. You still have the opportunity to stand up, ask questions, be critical,
and create your own perspective. Demand a setting that will provide you with intellectual
capabilities that allow you to expand your mind instead of directing it. Demand that you be
interested in class. Demand that the excuse, “You have to learn this for the test” is not good enough
for you. Education is an excellent tool, if used properly, but focuses more on learning rather than getting
good grades.
For those of you that work within the system that I am condemning, I do not mean to insult; I intend to
motivate. You have the power to change the incompetence of this system. I know that you did not
become a teacher or administrator to see your students bored. You cannot accept the authority of the
governing bodies that tell you what to teach, how to teach it, and that you will be punished if you do not
comply. Our potential is at stake.
For those of you that are now leaving this establishment, I say, do not forget what went on in these
classrooms. Do not abandon those that come after you. We are the new future and we are not going to let
tradition stand. We will break down the walls of corruption to let a garden of knowledge grow throughout
America. Once educated properly, we will have the power to do anything, and best of all, we will only
use that power for good, for we will be cultivated and wise. We will not accept anything at face value.
We will ask questions, and we will demand truth.
So, here I stand. I am not standing here as valedictorian by myself. I was molded by my environment,
by all of my peers who are sitting here watching me. I could not have accomplished this without all of
you. It was all of you who truly made me the person I am today. It was all of you who were my
competition, yet my backbone. In that way, we are all valedictorians.
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
I am now supposed to say farewell to this institution, to those who maintain it, and to those who stand
with me and behind me, but I hope this farewell is more of a, “see you later,” when we are all working
together to rear a pedagogic movement. But first, let’s go get those pieces of paper that tell us that we’re
smart enough to do so!
The Coolest Tool is a Non-Tool Turned into a Tool
Posted: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 in Born Without Money
For this writing I will use a broad and widely accepted definition of the word, “Tool,” as follows; “An
entity used to interface between two or more domains that facilitates more effective action of one domain
upon the other.”
A use for a tool is only limited by our imagination. How many times have you used a butter knife, or a
penny, as a screwdriver? There is a popular American phrase, “McGyver it,” and the question inspired by
the television show, “What would McGyver do?” So then, do you believe it is possible to take a so-
called, “non-tool,” or specific type of, “tool,” for a specific kind of purpose, and use it as a “tool,” to
accomplish a different purpose? I bet you have already done this at least once in your life.
Now, let’s take a look at a Drivers License and what we have been told concerning it. We have been told
it is a, “privilege,” to have a Drivers License, correct? Recently, I have been saying how you can flip that
very intent and turn the, “privilege” into a, “benefit.” However, the “benefit,” is not for you, but for
another domain, as in the definition for tool above states it is to, “facilitate [an] effective action of one
domain upon the other.” The question is, “What action?”
How about to correct the mistake of you misusing the tool/Drivers License by using it for a purpose never
intended. Let us say you have use of some property, an automobile, which is owned by the Public Trust.
It has the required STATE flag (license plate), and STATE tags (expire date) on the back, correct? So
then, how is the POLICE OFFICER/SHERIFF’S DEPUTY/US AGENT to know whether you are a,
“STATUTORY EMPLOYEE,” (required to comply with all of the statutes and codes of the UNITED
STATES, i.e. STATUTORY SLAVERY), or a friend of the Public Trust (amicus curiae – Latin, therefore,
exempt and free) who has use of the property in consideration for enriching the Public Trust? So then, if
they do not know this difference, there must be a mistake, yes? Perhaps that mistake needs to be
corrected, yes?
It is true the image on the Drivers License is not us. However, the image is something that does look like
us so the POLICE OFFICER/SHERIFF’S DEPUTY/US AGENT know they have the correct man or
woman that is the, “authorized user,” of the automobile that was deposited into the public trust via
registration. Minus all the legal terminology, we have been indoctrinated with, the Drivers License is
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
simply a “tool,” to which we must start to think of differently and thereby use differently, as perhaps in
the ways of Natural Law instead of what we have been told to use it for, which is foreign to their own
laws/statutes and codes, that they make use of in their “official” capacity.
So then, consider the following idea to correct this mistake. Write a letter to your
DIRECTOR/SECRETARY of the DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES. Let them know that you are
aware of, “who,” the OWNER of the MOTOR VEHICLE actually is, and that this fact remains
undisputed. Also, mention that you are grateful for their kind service in fulfilling their fiduciary duties in
this matter, and that their fiduciary duties will also remain undisputed and unhindered by you, so they can
serve the Public Trust in the capacity of Trustee honorable, and that you will assist them whenever
possible.
For this writing I will use a broad and widely accepted definition of the word, “Tool,” as follows; “An
entity used to interface between two or more domains that facilitates more effective action of one domain
upon the other.”
A use for a tool is only limited by our imagination. How many times have you used a butter knife, or a
penny, as a screwdriver? There is a popular American phrase, “McGyver it,” and the question inspired by
the television show, “What would McGyver do?” So then, do you believe it is possible to take a so-
called, “non-tool,” or specific type of, “tool,” for a specific kind of purpose, and use it as a “tool,” to
accomplish a different purpose? I bet you have already done this at least once in your life.
Now, let’s take a look at a Drivers License and what we have been told concerning it. We have been told
it is a, “privilege,” to have a Drivers License, correct? Recently, I have been saying how you can flip that
very intent and turn the, “privilege” into a, “benefit.” However, the “benefit,” is not for you, but for
another domain, as in the definition for tool above states it is to, “facilitate [an] effective action of one
domain upon the other.” The question is, “What action?”
How about to correct the mistake of you misusing the tool/Drivers License by using it for a purpose never
intended. Let us say you have use of some property, an automobile, which is owned by the Public Trust.
It has the required STATE flag (license plate), and STATE tags (expire date) on the back, correct? So
then, how is the POLICE OFFICER/SHERIFF’S DEPUTY/US AGENT to know whether you are a,
“STATUTORY EMPLOYEE,” (required to comply with all of the statutes and codes of the UNITED
STATES, i.e. STATUTORY SLAVERY), or a friend of the Public Trust (amicus curiae – Latin, therefore,
exempt and free) who has use of the property in consideration for enriching the Public Trust? So then, if
they do not know this difference, there must be a mistake, yes? Perhaps that mistake needs to be
corrected, yes?
It is true the image on the Drivers License is not us. However, the image is something that does look like
us so the POLICE OFFICER/SHERIFF’S DEPUTY/US AGENT know they have the correct man or
woman that is the, “authorized user,” of the automobile that was deposited into the public trust via
registration. Minus all the legal terminology, we have been indoctrinated with, the Drivers License is
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
simply a “tool,” to which we must start to think of differently and thereby use differently, as perhaps in
the ways of Natural Law instead of what we have been told to use it for, which is foreign to their own
laws/statutes and codes, that they make use of in their “official” capacity.
So then, consider the following idea to correct this mistake. Write a letter to your
DIRECTOR/SECRETARY of the DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES. Let them know that you are
aware of, “who,” the OWNER of the MOTOR VEHICLE actually is, and that this fact remains
undisputed. Also, mention that you are grateful for their kind service in fulfilling their fiduciary duties in
this matter, and that their fiduciary duties will also remain undisputed and unhindered by you, so they can
serve the Public Trust in the capacity of Trustee honorable, and that you will assist them whenever
possible.
28 fundamental beliefs of the Founding Fathers
Posted: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 in Born Without Money

Discover the 28 fundamental beliefs of the Founding Fathers which they said must be understood and
perpetuated by every people who desired peace, prosperity, and freedom. These beliefs have made
possible more progress in 200 years than was made previously in over 5,000 years. The following is a
brief overview of the principles found in the movie, “The Five Thousand Year Leap,” and one chapter is
devotes to each of these 28 principles.Principle 1: The only reliable basis for sound government and just
human relations is Natural Law. Natural law is God’s law. There are certain laws which govern the entire
universe, and just as Thomas Jefferson said in the Declaration of Independence, there are laws which
govern in the affairs of men which are “the laws of nature and of nature’s God.”
Principle 2: A free people cannot survive under a republican constitution unless they remain virtuous and
morally strong. “Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious,
they have more need of masters.” – Benjamin Franklin
Principle 3: The most promising method of securing a virtuous people is to elect virtuous leaders.
“Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people
whose manners are universally corrupt. He therefore is the truest friend to the liberty of his country who
tries most to promote its virtue, and who … will not suffer a man to be chosen into any office of power
and trust who is not a wise and virtuous man.” – Samuel Adams
Principle 4: Without religion the government of a free people cannot be maintained. “Of all the
dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable
supports…. And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without
religion.” – George Washington
Principle 5: All things were created by God, therefore upon him all mankind are equally dependent, and
to him they are equally responsible. The American Founding Fathers considered the existence of the
Creator as the most fundamental premise underlying all self-evident truth. They felt a Man who boasted
he or she was an atheist had just simply failed to apply his or her divine capacity for reason and
observation.
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
Principle 6: All mankind were created equal. The Founders knew that in these three ways, all mankind
are theoretically treated as:
(#1). Equal BEFORE God.
(#2). Equal BEFORE the law.
(#3). Equal with & in their rights.
Principle 7: The proper role of government is to protect equal rights, not provide equal things. The
Founders recognized that the people cannot delegate to their government any power except that which
they have the lawful right to exercise themselves.
Principle 8: Mankind are endowed by God with certain unalienable rights. “Those rights, then, which
God and nature have established, and are therefore called natural rights, such as are life and liberty, need
not the aid of human laws to be more effectually invested in every man than they are; neither do they
receive any additional strength when declared by the municipal [or state] laws to be inviolable. On the
contrary, no human legislation has power to abridge or destroy them, unless the owner [of the right] shall
himself commit some act that amounts to a forfeiture.” – William Blackstone
Principle 9: To protect human rights, God has revealed a code of divine law. “The doctrines thus
delivered we call the revealed or divine law, and they are to be found only in the Holy Scriptures. These
precepts, when revealed, are found by comparison to be really a part of the original law of nature, as they
tend in all their consequences to man’s felicity.” – William Blackstone
Principle 10: The God-given right to govern is vested in the sovereign authority of the whole people.
“The fabric of the American empire ought to rest on the solid basis of the consent of the people. The
streams of national power ought to flow immediately from that pure, original fountain of all legislative
authority.” – Alexander Hamilton
Principle 11: The majority of the people may alter or abolish a government which has become
tyrannical. “Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for
light and transient causes … but when a long train of abuses and usurpations … evinces a design to
reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and
to provide new guards for their future security.” -Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence
Principle 12: The United States of America shall be a republic. “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the
United States of America and to the republic for which it stands….”
Principle 13: A Constitution should protect the people from the frailties of their rulers. “If angels were to
govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary… . [But lacking
these] you must
first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.” –
James Madison
Principle 14: Life and liberty are secure only so long as the rights of property are secure. John Locke
reasoned that God gave the earth and everything in it to the whole human family as a gift. Therefore the
land, the sea, the acorns in the forest, the deer feeding in the meadow belong to everyone “in common.”
However, the moment someone takes the trouble to change something from its original state of nature,
that Man has added his ingenuity or labor to make that change. Herein lies the secret to the origin of,
“property rights.”
Principle 15: The highest level of prosperity occurs when there is a free-market economy and a minimum
of government regulations. Prosperity depends upon a climate of wholesome stimulation with four basic
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
freedoms in operation:
#1. The Freedom to try.
#2. The Freedom to buy.
#3. The Freedom to sell.
#4. The Freedom to fail.
Principle 16: The government should be separated into three branches. “I call you to witness that I was
the first member of the Congress who ventured to come out in public, as I did in January 1776, in my
Thoughts on Government … in favor of a government with three branches and an independent judiciary.
This pamphlet, you know, was very unpopular. No man appeared in public to support it but yourself.” –
John Adams
Principle 17: A system of checks and balances should be adopted to prevent the abuse of power by the
different branches of government. “It will not be denied that power is of an encroaching nature and that it
ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it.” – James Madison
Principle 18: The unalienable rights of the people are most likely to be preserved if the principles of
government are set forth in a written Constitution. The structure of the American system is set forth in
the Constitution of the United States and the only weaknesses which have appeared are those which were
allowed to creep in despite the Constitution.
Principle 19: Only limited and carefully defined powers should be delegated to government, all others
being retained by the people. The Tenth Amendment is the most widely violated provision of the Bill of
Rights. If it had been respected and enforced, America would be an amazingly different country than it is
today. This amendment provides: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
Principle 20: Efficiency and dispatch require that the government operate according to the will of the
majority, but constitutional provisions must be made to protect the rights of the minority. “Every man, by
consenting with others to make one body politic under one government, puts himself under an obligation
to everyone of that society to submit to the determination of the majority, and to be concluded [bound] by
it.” – John Locke
Principle 21: Strong local self-government is the keystone to preserving Man kinds liberty. “The way to
have good and safe government is not to trust it all to one, but to divide it among the many, distributing to
every one exactly the functions he is competent [to perform best].” – Thomas Jefferson
Principle 22: A peaceful inhabitant should be governed by love and not by the whims of men. “The end
of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge liberty. For in all the states of created
beings, capable of laws, where there is no law there is no freedom. For liberty is to be free from restraint
and violence of others, which cannot be where there is no law.” – John Locke
Principle 23: A free society cannot survive as a republic without a broad program of general education.
“They made an early provision by law that every town consisting of so many families should be always
furnished with a grammar school. They made it a crime for such a town to be destitute of a grammar
schoolmaster for a few months, and subjected it to a heavy penalty. So that the education of all ranks of
people was made the care and expense of the public, in a manner that I believe has been unknown to any
other people, ancient or modern. The consequences of these establishments we see and feel every day
[written in 1765]. A native of America who cannot read and write is as rare … as a comet or an
earthquake.” John Adams
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
Principle 24: A free people will not survive unless they stay strong. “To be prepared for war is one of the
most effectual means of preserving peace.” – George Washington
Principle 25: “Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations — entangling alliances with
none.” -Thomas Jefferson, given in his first inaugural address.
Principle 26: The core unit which determines the strength of any society is the family; therefore, the
government should foster and protect its integrity. “There is certainly no country in the world where the
tie of marriage is more respected than in America, or where conjugal happiness is more highly or worthily
appreciated.” Alexis de Tocqueville
Principle 27: The burden of debt is as destructive to human freedom as subjugation by conquest. “We
are bound to defray expenses [of the war] within our own time, and are unauthorized to burden posterity
with them… We shall all consider ourselves morally bound to pay them ourselves and consequently
within the life [expectancy] of the majority.” – Thomas Jefferson
Principle 28: The United States has a manifest destiny to eventually become a glorious example of God’s
Royal Law of, “Love one another as I have loved you,” and, “Love your neighbor as yourself,” through a
proper and recognized identity in agreement, which was established before the foundation of THIS
WORLD was laid. This will inspire all Men to be who they truly are, and have always been.
The Founders sensed from the very beginning that they were on a divine mission. Their great
disappointment was that it did not all come to pass in their day, but they knew that someday it would.
John Adams wrote: “I always consider the settlement of America with reverence and wonder, as the
opening of a grand scene and design in Providence for the illumination of the ignorant, and the
emancipation of the slavish part of mankind all over the earth.”
To Claim, “Remedy” or not to Claim “Remedy,” What is

the “Solution?”
Posted: Monday, July 26, 2010 in Born Without Money
While visiting an Internet Chat room today, once again I have heard the standardized trumpet call for
“remedy,” as a way to resolve ones financial difficulties. In the “PatRIOT-world,” the vast majority of
its followers have received plenty of brain entrainment to seek, demand, and claim, “their remedy,” to
whatever financial problems or difficulties to which they are involved. The question is, are you certain
that this is the best word to use to describe what it is that you seek?
A friend and brother here on the land in North Carolina has shared his thoughts on this matter, and I do
agree with this findings. Upon examination of the word “remedy,” this definition is given in the…
Uniform Commercial Code 1-201
General definitions:
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
36. “Rights” includes remedies.
A remedy is a commercial right for those who acquire that right through an instrument.
The question I asked myself was, “Do I really want to claim a “commercial right?” In light of the fact
that this, “commercial right,” is defined in THEIR codes and statutes, means that I would be subjecting
myself under their jurisdiction in order to make such a claim and thereby have the remedy that I seek,
yes? Does this not mean this would become an extended privilege to me through THEIR
code/jurisdiction? Furthermore, is not a privilege given to a subordinate and can thus also be taken away
from the subordinate? I think you see my point here. Folks, I really do not like the thought of being a
subject of a jurisdiction, or of another being. However, I do like egalitarianism very much.
So then, if I Am to leave the word, “remedy,” out of the equation, how would I communicate my intention
so that the desired objective and outcome is realized? The answer is the word “solution.” To ask, seek,
find a, “solution,” suits my needs, and avoids trekking into THEIR jurisdictional realm and making use of
a benefit-privilege extended to any and all who participate in THEIR commercial world through the usage
of such privileges.
It is interesting to note that in the standard dictionary, it is the 3rd and 4th definitions, (especially the 4th)
of the world “solution,” that fits the intended need and purpose.
so·lu·tion (s-lshn)
n. 1(a). A homogeneous mixture of two or more substances, which may be solids, liquids, gases, or
acombination of these.
(b). The process of forming such a mixture.
2. The state of being dissolved.
3(a). The method or process of solving a problem.
(b). The answer to or disposition of a problem.
4. Law Payment or satisfaction of a claim or debt. [*Winner!]
5. The act of separating or breaking up; dissolution.
Law Dictionaries also concur with this definition:
SOLUTION, civil law. Payment.
1. By this term, is understood, every species of discharge or liberation, which is called satisfaction, and
with which the creditor is satisfied.
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
2. This term has rather a reference to the substance of the obligation, than to the numeration or counting
of the money.
3. Discharge of a contract
So then, “To claim “remedy” or not to claim “remedy,” which is the BEST “Solution,” for you and
your peace of mind?
While visiting an Internet Chat room today, once again I have heard the standardized trumpet call for
“remedy,” as a way to resolve ones financial difficulties. In the “PatRIOT-world,” the vast majority of
its followers have received plenty of brain entrainment to seek, demand, and claim, “their remedy,” to
whatever financial problems or difficulties to which they are involved. The question is, are you certain
that this is the best word to use to describe what it is that you seek?
A friend and brother here on the land in North Carolina has shared his thoughts on this matter, and I do
agree with this findings. Upon examination of the word “remedy,” this definition is given in the…
Uniform Commercial Code 1-201
General definitions:
36. “Rights” includes remedies.
A remedy is a commercial right for those who acquire that right through an instrument.
The question I asked myself was, “Do I really want to claim a “commercial right?” In light of the fact
that this, “commercial right,” is defined in THEIR codes and statutes, means that I would be subjecting
myself under their jurisdiction in order to make such a claim and thereby have the remedy that I seek,
yes? Does this not mean this would become an extended privilege to me through THEIR
code/jurisdiction? Furthermore, is not a privilege given to a subordinate and can thus also be taken away
from the subordinate? I think you see my point here. Folks, I really do not like the thought of being a
subject of a jurisdiction, or of another being. However, I do like egalitarianism very much.
So then, if I Am to leave the word, “remedy,” out of the equation, how would I communicate my intention
so that the desired objective and outcome is realized? The answer is the word “solution.” To ask, seek,
find a, “solution,” suits my needs, and avoids trekking into THEIR jurisdictional realm and making use of
a benefit-privilege extended to any and all who participate in THEIR commercial world through the usage
of such privileges.
It is interesting to note that in the standard dictionary, it is the 3rd and 4th definitions, (especially the 4th)
of the world “solution,” that fits the intended need and purpose.
so·lu·tion (s-lshn)
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
n.
1(a). A homogeneous mixture of two or more substances, which may be solids, liquids, gases, or a
combination of these.
(b). The process of forming such a mixture.
2. The state of being dissolved.

3(a). The method or process of solving a problem.
(b). The answer to or disposition of a problem.
4. Law Payment or satisfaction of a claim or debt. [*Winner!]
5. The act of separating or breaking up; dissolution.
Law Dictionaries also concur with this definition:
SOLUTION, civil law. Payment.
1. By this term, is understood, every species of discharge or liberation, which is called
satisfaction, and with which the creditor is satisfied.
2. This term has rather a reference to the substance of the obligation, than to the numeration or
counting of the money.
3. Discharge of a contract
So then, “To claim “remedy” or not to claim “remedy,” which is the BEST “Solution,” for you and
your peace of mind?
Are you a PERSON, or a Living Be-ing?
Posted: Sunday, July 25, 2010 in Born Without Money
Vic wrote, “We cannot apply for a drivers license as an example and not be subject to
constitutional/governmental authority.”
Later he writes, “The Government cannot see or affect man, it sees names and names are persons as are
men who act like they are subject to constitutional authority who by their own actions (voluntary
ignorance) are identifying themselves as persons.”
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
Is not the name on the driver’s license of the person? So then, how does Vic conclude that a connection is
made between the driver’s license and Man created in the image and likeness of God, male and female?
His conclusion is by obtaining a driver license you voluntarily and automatically attached your Be-ing to
becoming the PERSON. Yes, this can happen and we have all experienced how this works, however does
this have to be the way things work out? Does this conclusion sound like the same kind of presumption
that the agents/servants/trustee are working through? Furthermore, why can you not also use a driver
license, social security card, and other such documents created by Caesar/Government for the purpose to
show that you are a “user,” of the NAME only, having no liability for it?
Since it is true that Government can only see Fictional Entities/PERSONS, (which is good) then how can
the Government, all the sudden slam on the breaks, and draw a connection between a living Be-ing and a
PERSON? Certainly, THEY cannot! Therefore, all connections can only be drawn by you or I, which I
do believe Vic also references in this writing. So then, I think the key word that is missing here is,
“Indemnification.” We know that the driver license belongs to the Government/Caesar. So if they ask for
it, “GIVE,” it to them! For the Sons and Heirs is exempt and can and does give, because the Son and
Heir is the producer of all good things in His Dominion of which he is the ruler (Genesis 1:26-28). In
other words, the document will become whatever it needs to be, according to the USE you make of it. It
comes down to “how” you “use” the document, because how you use it, how you give it to them, will
determine how it will be used either for you, or against you.
Now, look at the back of the Social Security Card. It is written upon it, “This card belongs to the Social
Security Administration and you must return it if we ask for it.” Since the Social Security Card produced
by the Government is for the PERSON, is it not logical to conclude that the Driver License was also
produced by the Government for the PERSON as well? Does not the creator of a
“thing/document/product,” also have the responsibility of liability of the thing they created? How then
can you and I, who are, “Living Be-ings,” have liability for a driver license? Did we create it? How can
the Corporation/Government/Caesar evade and avoid the maxim of law of like kinds? Only if they are
given power and authority from above, which means, if they do it is because you gave them consent, and
if they do not, it is because you did not consent to Be-ing recognized by the NAME and NUMBER that
they are liable for, because they are the creator of it.
So then, if you see and know the truth of this matter then, “render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s,”
and make absolutely sure that any of the agents of Caesar know that you are giving to them that which
already belongs to them so that they, “be not offended.”
Vic wrote, “We cannot apply for a drivers license as an example and not be subject to
constitutional/governmental authority.”
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
Later he writes, “The Government cannot see or affect man, it sees names and names are persons as are
men who act like they are subject to constitutional authority who by their own actions (voluntary
ignorance) are identifying themselves as persons.”
Is not the name on the driver’s license of the person? So then, how does Vic conclude that some kind of
connection can be made between the driver’s license and Man created in the image and likeness of God,
male and female? His conclusion is by obtaining a driver license you voluntarily and automatically
attaches your Be-ing to becoming the PERSON. Yes, this can happen and we have all experienced how
this works, however does this have to be the way things work out? Does this conclusion sound like the
same kind of presumption that the agents/servants/trustee are working through? Furthermore, why can
you not also use a drivers license, social security card, and other such documents created by
Caesar/Government for the purpose to show that you are a “user,” of the NAME only, having no liability
for it?
Since it is true that Government can only see Fictional Entities/PERSONS, (which is good) then how can
the Government, all of the sudden slam on the breaks, and draw a connection between a living Be-ing and
a PERSON? Certainly, THEY cannot! Therefore, all connections can only be drawn by you or I, which I
do believe Vic also references in this writing. So then, I think the key word that is missing here is,
“Indemnification.” We know that the driver license belongs to the Government/Caesar. So if they ask for
it, “GIVE,” it to them! For the Sons and Heir is exempt and therefore can and does give, because the Son
and Heir is the producer of all good things in His Dominion of which he is the ruler (Genesis 1:26-28). In
other words, the document will become whatever it needs to be, according to the USE you make of it. It
comes down to “how” you “use” the document, for how you use it; it will be returned unto you.
Now, look at the back of the Social Security Card. It is written upon it, “This card belongs to the Social
Security Administration and you must return it if we ask for it.” Since the Social Security Card was
produced by the Government for the PERSON, is it not logical to conclude that the Driver License was
also produced by the Government for the PERSON as well? Does not the creator of a
“thing/document/product,” also have the responsibility of liability of the thing they created? How then
can you and I, who are living Be-ings, have liability for a driver license? Did we create it? How can the
Corporation/Government/Caesar evade and avoid the maxim of law of like kinds? Only if they are given
power and authority from above, which means, if they do it is because you gave them consent, and if not,
it is because you did not consent to Be-ing recognized by the NAME and NUMBER that they are liable
for, because they are the creator of it.
So then, if you see and know the truth of this matter then, “render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s,”
and make absolutely sure that any of the agents of Caesar know that you are giving to them that which
already belongs to them so that they, “be not offended.”
“See things as they are; NOT as they appear to be”
Posted: Saturday, July 24, 2010 in Humor and Interesting Quotes

Around the year, 1992 was the beginning of the current trek of my present day journey. I began to form
and ask questions about life, identity, and other such important issues. By the end of 1998, I began to see
that there are actually two worlds present. One of the reality we were all destined to from before the
foundation of world was laid, and the other consisting of total and complete fiction; “a prison for your
16.3.2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY
mind.” However, at that time, I was not using that kind of verbiage. I knew of the appearance, but there
was no practical application of the difference in my life. So I learned how to express this dichotomy with
the phrase, “See things as they are; NOT as they appear to be,” which then helped me to describe the
observations of my journey at that time.
In short, “See things as they are; NOT as they appear to be,” serves as a notice for me to always
remain diligent in all things, and depend upon no so-called external power or authority for the truth. So
then, this is why encourage and edify others to, follow their heart… listen to their heart… and ask
questions of their own heart, so that the answers needed be revealed unto them.
Blog at WordPress.com. Do Not Sell My Personal Information

2010 - Born in Equity PDF

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

2010 - Born in Equity PDF

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

16.3.

2020 2010 | BORN IN EQUITY

Posted: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 in Born Without Money

A Simple Solution Possibility

A Simple Solution Possibility

A Simple Solution Possibility

A Simple Solution Possibility

Who’s Your Daddy/Father and Are You Sure?

Posted: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 in Born Without Money

In Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856, states:

However, notice the second definition of the word Guardian…

<!–[if !mso]> <! st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } –>

In Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856, states:

However, notice the second definition of the word Guardian…

In Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856, states:

However, notice the second definition of the word Guardian…

he is with this knowledge.

In Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856, states:

However, notice the second definition of the word Guardian…

We Contract Because We Do Not Trust

Posted: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 in THE GIFT OF MY EPISTLE

POST #01 – INTRODUCTION – THE GIFT OF

Posted: Saturday, October 9, 2010 in THE GIFT OF MY EPISTLE

THE GIFT OF ONLASHUK’S EPISTLE

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF BEING HERE? (I DARE

IRS SOLUTION FOR THE FAITHFUL

Posted: Friday, October 1, 2010 in Born Without Money

IRS SOLUTION FOR THE FAITHFUL

IRS SOLUTION FOR THE FAITHFUL

IRS SOLUTION FOR THE FAITHFUL

IRS SOLUTION FOR THE FAITHFUL

Know Thyself, “Human,” -or- “Man”

Posted: Thursday, July 29, 2010 in What Do I Believe and Why

What Is Man That You Need To Be Aware Of

Posted: Thursday, July 29, 2010 in What Do I Believe and Why

Erica Goldon Speaks Out Giving An AWESOME

Posted: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 in Born Without Money

Erica Goldon the valedictorian of the 2010

The Coolest Tool is a Non-Tool Turned into a Tool

Posted: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 in Born Without Money

28 fundamental beliefs of the Founding Fathers

Posted: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 in Born Without Money

To Claim, “Remedy” or not to Claim “Remedy,” What is

Posted: Monday, July 26, 2010 in Born Without Money

Uniform Commercial Code 1-201

36. “Rights” includes remedies.

(b). The process of forming such a mixture.

2. The state of being dissolved.

3(a). The method or process of solving a problem.

(b). The answer to or disposition of a problem.

4. Law Payment or satisfaction of a claim or debt. [*Winner!]

5. The act of separating or breaking up; dissolution.

Law Dictionaries also concur with this definition:

SOLUTION, civil law. Payment.

3. Discharge of a contract

Uniform Commercial Code 1-201

36. “Rights” includes remedies.

2. The state of being dissolved.

Law Dictionaries also concur with this definition:

SOLUTION, civil law. Payment.

3. Discharge of a contract

Are you a PERSON, or a Living Be-ing?

Posted: Sunday, July 25, 2010 in Born Without Money