Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

AutoZine Technical School - Suspension Page 1

Suspension Geometry (cont'l)

Independent Suspensions
Swing axle suspension

This is a very old independent suspension, used by some sports cars since the 50s, such as
VW Beetle, Porsche 356 (which was based on Beetle) and Mercedes' famous 300SL
Gullwing (1954). However, it disappeared for at least 2 decades because it has so much
weakness. The only advantage is - it provides independent shock absorption.

Handling is really awful, as camber angle can be noticeably changed by bouncing motion (as
shown in the first picture), change of static weight of the car (second picture) and body roll
(third picture). Especially is the body roll, which makes both wheels lean towards the corner,
thus result in severe oversteer. This explain why the Mercedes 300SL Gullwing was criticised
as very unpredictable and difficult to handle.

Camber variation can be reduced via using longer swing arms, but this could create problems
in packaging. It engages the space for rear seats and even the boot.

Another solution is to introduce inherent understeer by setting the wheels negative cambered.
This could compensate the oversteer during cornering but the drawback is the instability in
straight line. To cars as slow as VW Beetle, swing axle shows its advantage in ride comfort
over contemporary non-independent suspensions while the weakness in handling is not easily
seen. For Porsche 356, at least in the less-powerful early versions, the problem is not severe,
too. In later years, when the car got bigger and bigger engine, Porsche realised that the days
for swing axle had nearly finished. That came true when the 911 launched in 1963, used
trailing arm at the rear instead of swing axle.

Advantage: Independent ride.

Disadvantage: Very bad handling.

Who use it ? Mercedes 300SL (1954), VW Beetle, Porsche 356 etc.

Double wishbones suspension

To many suspension designers, double wishbones (or "A-arms") is the most ideal suspension. It can be used in front and rear
wheels, it is independent and most important, it has near perfect camber control. For 40 years and even today, this is the first
choice for racing cars, sports cars and demanding sedans.

Basically, double wishbones suspension always maintains the wheel perpendicular to the road surface, irrespective of the wheel's
movement. This ensure good handling.

Traditional double wishbones consists of 2 parellel wishbone arms of equal length, which has the drawback of excessive tire
scrubbing because of the large variation in track width as the wheel moved off the neutral position. Therefore engineers developed
unequal-length non-parellel A-arms to solve this. By tilting the upper A-arm, anti-dive function is also achieved.

http://www.autozine.org/technical_school/suspension/tech_suspension2.htm 11/12/2010 7:10:47 PM

AutoZine Technical School - Suspension Page 2

<< Porsche 993's rear suspension

Double wishbones suspension has been very popular in American cars. Not so in Europe because cars in there
are smaller thus cannot accommodatethis relatively space-engaging suspension. Besides, it is more costly
than MacPhersonstrut and torsion beam because it involves more components and more suspension pick up
points in the car body. Owing to these reasons, very few small cars adopt it. One of the few examples is
Honda Civic.

This does not mean American cars have better handling. No, due to their larger size and weight and the less
effort spent in suspension tuning, the majority of double wishbones-equipped American cars actually handles

Advantage: Ideal camber control leads to good handling.

Disadvantage: Space engaging and costly.

Who use it ? American sports cars and some sedans, most European pure sports cars like Ferrari, TVR, Lotus .... some Euopean
sedans, most Honda .... many many many.

MacPherson strut suspension

The MacPhersonstrut suspension was invented in the 1940s by Earl S. MacPhersonof Ford. It was introduced on the 1950 English
Ford and has since become one of the dominating suspensions systems of the world because of its compactness and low cost.

Unlike other suspension designs, in MacPhersonstrut suspension, the telescopic shock absorber also serves as a link to control the
position of the wheel. Therefore it saves the upper control arm. Besides, since the strut is vertically positioned, the whole suspension
is very compact. To front-wheel drive cars, whose engine and transmissionare all located inside the front compartment, they need
front suspensions which engage very little width of the car. Undoubtedly, MacPhersion strut suspension is the most suitable one.

Nevertheless, this simple design does not offer very good handling. Body roll and wheel's movement lead to variation in camber,
although not as severe as swing axle suspension. From a designer's viewpoint, its relatively high overall height requires a higher
hood and fender line, which is not very desirable to sports cars' styling.

<< Hyundai Atoz's MacPhersonstrut

Like double wishbones suspension, MacPhersonstrut can be adopted in both front and rear wheels. In
the 80s, there are many budget sedans employed Mac strut in all corners, the most famous is Fiat's
Type 4 and Tipo platforms, on which Fiat Croma, Lancia Thema, Saab 9000, Fiat Tipo, Tempra, Lancia
Delta, Dedra etc. were based. None of them was famous of handling. Basically, Alfa Romeo's GTV /
Spider is also based on the Tipo platform, however, after experienced unsatisfatory handling during
testing, the rear MacPhersonstruts were replaced by the pricier multi-link suspensions.

Advantage: Compact and cheap.

Disadvantage: Average handling.

Who use it ? Most front-wheel drive compact cars.

Continue ...
Copyright© 1998-2000 by Mark Wan
AutoZine Technical School
Return to AutoZine home page

http://www.autozine.org/technical_school/suspension/tech_suspension2.htm 11/12/2010 7:10:47 PM