Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 7

Chapter 7

EARLY BARNABITE LIFE

Old Barnabite life is like the life-giving marrow which gives vitality to the branches of the
grown tree.

Relying on the earliest documents of our history, we will try to reconstruct this life, taking
notice especially of the hierarchical structure of our first communities, then of their coenobitic life
centered on the “chapters,” and finally we will touch on their asceticism and penitential practices.
While these practices provoked much public criticism of the Barnabites and Angelics, they also
strengthened them in their resolve and tempered their ardor.

The Superior

The superior was elected every year in three successive chapters, “by all vocales of the
place at that time,” upon the proposal of a special advisor known as a “discreet.” Whoever received
the majority of votes (“above the half” according to the early regulation) became superior. Once
elected he could not decline the position.

Once the superior was elected, then everyone present, starting with the vicar, “would
pledge obedience and beg to be accepted as a son. And, embracing and kissing all, he accepted
them.”

At the end of this ceremony he would confirm the other officers: the discreet, the vicar, the
master of novices, and the mayor.
70 CHAPTER 7 - Early Barnabite Life

If the community was the body, then the superior was the head, the father of all: he presided
over the chapters, accepted new postulants, and had “the authority to absolve in some cases.”

The Discreets

Discreets numbered between two and four. They would take turns “watching over the
house’s [congregation‘s] interior and exterior life.” All confreres would open their hearts to them
in a form of spiritual direction called a “dialogue.” Together with the superior, they also oversaw
discipline within the community. It was within the competence of the discreet to dismiss anyone
who, after three admonitions, had been found negligent in his spiritual life. But they had to proceed
with caution and charity: “in decision making may they be guided by the Crucified Lord…rather
than by their own wisdom. In examining the situations of people, they should be prudent, now
reprimanding with amiability, now flattering with careful solicitude, providing whatever is needed.
They should remember that they are the columns of the house, and they should be like four lamps
constantly burning in front of Christ. They should teach with deeds rather than with words.”

The holy founder’s Constitutions held forth grave punishments for a discreet who was
negligent in the delicate function of correction: “if... they should make mistakes in the above things
[expulsion after three admonitions], under the cover of piety, then you should punish them in this
way: henceforth they must never again be admitted to this office; and if they should complain in
any way, then expel them from the Society.”

The Vicar

The vicar substituted for the superior in his absence. Another function was the one which
today belongs to the procurator. According to the Acts: “(The Father Vicar) in his doing should
not look for a caress, nor should he hope for smiling faces, instead, bound to the Cross and keeping
that in mind, he should act looking only at the Crucified Christ, and trusting only Christ; if
sometime he should be short of money, with faith he should go to the Crucified Lord to pray that,
having nothing else, he would supply with a piece of his own torn flesh; aware that if the confreres
would complain or would not be satisfied, he would be the cause, because it is a sign that he does
not operate for the sake of Christ. If he would act for the sake of Christ and with faith in him, they
would be satisfied, even if he should put in front of them a roasted slipper (to eat).”

In our own day the Constitutions are very severe with the procurator who is too...
providing! Here is what they say: “Only one person should handle the money. If, after a month, he
has not disposed of the sum needed for the house, or (given it away) in alms, he must fast on bread
and water for three days; the second time (this happens) he should be deprived of Holy Communion
for the whole year, except on Easter: and not only should he be separated from all the confreres in
all activities of the Community, but he should also be deprived of conversation with the confreres,
and of their prayers, and, besides, once a week for a whole year he must fast on bread and water.
HISTORY OF THE BARNABITES 71

But if he should fall into the same mistake a third time, consider him as an owner, and throw him
out of the Congregation.”

The Mayor

In modem terminology the mayor could be called the “moderator” of all activities.

Elected among the confreres who are without any office, the moderator, according to the
1552 Constitutions, had to be a lover of “strict observance of holy religion.” His task was to
supervise the observance of the Constitutions and Ordinances as well as the conduct of the
officials, and to examine if “the strict observance and holy institutes were in want.”

To this effect, he could, according to his judgment, “get together all the professed members
to see if one of the discreets, or the superior, had been negligent or malicious about those who
should had been expelled, or warned about!”

In the 1579 Constitutions this office was abolished, and the task was entrusted to the senior
discreet.

Life in common and the Chapters

Upon admitting the nobleman Joseph Contarini into the community, Father Morigia gave
an address, highlighting the concept of perfection in community: “Remember, brothers, what you
have done today together with me. We have accepted this our brother... therefore, try to be useful
to him, both with your prayer before God, and with exhortations and holy deeds and at the same
time, with your example….” The chapters, that is, community meetings for spiritual purposes,
were crucial, held thrice weekly and every day during Lent. Moreover, no religious could be absent
from certain chapters, like the collatio.

The holy founder’s Constitutions prescribed that: “Whatever will be concluded or defined
by the elder, not by age, but by a life worthy of praise,” should be written down in a book.

Another wise norm followed this: “After a certain span of time (as you see fit), read over
what has been written, and if opportune, make additions.”

Chapter of Faults

The professed religious, one by one, would gather in the middle of the chapter room or in
the choir of the church, and here make manifest his “greatest impediment to progress, and his
resolution to embrace the opposite virtue.” Any confrere could stand up and freely express his own
opinion regarding the one confessing his faults, provided it was done with great charity. At the end
72 CHAPTER 7 - Early Barnabite Life

of the session, the superior would make some recommendations, exhorting all to “grow day by day
toward higher virtues... more than what had been done in the past.”

Chapter of Censures

The “chapter of censures” could be general or particular. During the ‘general’ chapter of
censures everyone would report “whatever he had noticed as reprehensible in others.” The confrere
so addressed, “right away humbly knelt and accepted with gratitude the wholesome advice given
with love, and promised, inflamed as he was by the holy zeal of divine honor, to faithfully amend
himself.”

The ‘particular’ chapter of censures would take place for a specific religious who clearly
was not making progress in holiness, with the intention of freeing him from the impediments
keeping him from progressing in Christian virtue, “so that he would not be ungrateful for so many
gifts received from God, and could be legitimately enumerated and acknowledged as a son of Paul
the Saint.”

This chapter not only pinpointed the most outstanding imperfections, but offered spiritual
as well as practical advice towards improvement, always actuated by disinterested charity.
Certainly great faith was needed, for ever present was “the blessed Jesus, and Christ’s help could
not lack there where there was obedience; therefore, in so far as we are well disposed, we will
always receive help...” To advance in virtue, to overcome defects, was everybody’s concern and
joy.

The Collatio

The collatio, following the style of the old monastic gatherings described by the esteemed
author Cassian, was, we might say, a meditation in common. No one could miss it. Sometimes
friends were invited to participate.

The holy founder’s Constitutions included the rule that the collatio be held “daily for at
least one hour;” to take place especially before great solemnities, “to obtain the desired benefit for
those who want to advance in spiritual life.”

Therefore every religious, on his own or when invited by the superior, would stand up and
share his thoughts aloud, aiming at “uprooting vices, and gaining true and real virtues.”

Our ancestors believed this practice to be of great importance: “Everything will go to ruin
every time someone misses this holy conference; but if you, with love and avidity, and not by
habit, will persist in it, you will prosper in everything.”
HISTORY OF THE BARNABITES 73

Sacred Worship

Besides the chapters, which constituted the most salient expression of community life,
there was also the liturgical and prayer life.

The Mass was celebrated every day but not by all the priests, although the practice was
becoming more frequent. Everyone received Holy Communion on Sundays and on feast days.

The Divine Office was recited daily throughout the day according to the monastic tradition.
The official habit during the recitation of the Divine Office was the rochet over the cassock.

During the meal the reading was the rule, as already prescribed in the holy founder’s
Constitutions.

Great value was attached to silence and a recollected life. Father Soresina attested that our
ancestors “would mortify themselves with continuous silence; at the point that once the Divine
Office was finished in the morning they would ask permission to say only the necessary things.”
After dinner “they would have a little conversation, and then not a word could be heard.”

Especially valuable was the “Great Silence” at night, after evening prayers. We know that
it was Father Bartolomeo Ferrari, while superior, who introduced the practice of evening prayers.
One of these prayers was the “ (Ps. 53); on Wednesdays and Saturdays everyone recited the litanies
of the Blessed Mother.

The climax of community life was the investiture (bestowal of the religious habit for the
first time) and the profession of vows. The new members as well as the newly professed would
then be embraced by everyone in turn. A very meaningful gesture was the embrace reserved for
newcomers as well as for those who were being dismissed from the congregation, as in the case of
Davidico who “in the midst of recollections and embraces, as done by the children of Paul, was
dismissed.”

The penances of our first Fathers

The “domestic” penances practiced by our first fathers deserve a special treatise. For now,
however, we will focus on only a few.

As to food: it was meager. The Constitutions prescribed that “meat is never allowed for
those in good health.“ Only two light meals a day were permitted; no food was allowed in private
rooms.

Residences had to be “humble... with no sculptures or colors, except white.”

Money was entrusted to one person only. If he did not liquidate all of his funds by the end
of the month he was penalized. (Overstocking the kitchen with food was not an option.)A “repeat
offender” could even face expulsion.
74 CHAPTER 7 - Early Barnabite Life

The furniture had to be “sparse and humble;” clothing was unimportant and “such that one
could wear another’s cassock;” the beds were to be “simple and without decorations,” the sheets
of rough wool.

Obedience had to be “free not forced;” and the religious were to obey “according to the
intentions of the superior” rather than only when commanded. An external manifestation of
obedience and dependence was exhibited in the frequent use of “Your Blessing, Father,” invoked
every morning and evening, and before any major event of the day. Disobedience was always
punished, sometimes severely, as we read in Barnabite Beginnings.

Not at all strange or infrequent were public acts of penance. Before judging them, one
ought to look at the spiritual situation in Milan during the 1500’s. Father Gabuzio wrote tellingly:
“The Christian and ecclesial discipline had badly lapsed, and morals deteriorated; the harvest was
large, but the workers few.” Few also were the priests with an irreproachable reputation, so that a
popular saying of the day became: “Do you want to go to hell? Become a priest!” For many years
Milan also lacked able and pious shepherds in its bishops, in large part because of Spanish
domination, which was ushered in with the victory of Charles V over Francis I at Pavia, in 1525.

What better tools than public penances to reawaken the consciences of the people, and
rouse them from their spiritual sluggishness? One of our earliest chroniclers noted: “We started to
make public penances throughout the city of Milan.” In 1534 the chronicler Gian Marco Burigozzo
wrote: “Have appeared in Milan some priests wearing a despicable habit, and a kind of round
biretta, hatless, all dressed the same, with heads bowed, and living together close by Saint
Ambrose, where, they say, they do their offices, and live together, and they are all young.”

Our chroniclers provide us with more information about these public penances. “As a sign
of penance they wear a dark brown habit, rather small, [and] round birettas. When they walk
through Milan, the crowds yell at them…while children and others scream: look at the bigots!
Hypocrites! and similar other things.” This new revival of holiness exposed the serious
deficiencies among ecclesial people, some of whom did not hesitate to incite the people against
our priests.

Our chroniclers wrote of a “certain Friar Cornelio, who, giving lectures at La Rosa, would
spend most of his time speaking ill of the reverend fathers, condemning them as hypocrites, with
all kind of slanders against the order…he tried to convince the people that if they would do
violence to the fathers, by burning down their house, they would be offering a sacrifice to God.”

These calumnies and accusations culminated in a formal accusation brought against


Anthony M. Zaccaria before the Senate of Milan, the Archbishop’s Curia, and the Tribunal of the
Inquisition, both in Milan and in Rome.

The complaints centered upon

1) the novelties introduced by the order, which were disturbing public peace;
HISTORY OF THE BARNABITES 75

2) the fact that due to the humiliations and show of penances never before witnessed, the
dignity of many noblemen (who had relatives in the said order) was being violated;

3) the danger that what seemed to be forms of piety might damage the integrity of faith, all
the more so as these religious had introduced in public various religious practices which instead
of promoting sound and authentic piety, were fomenting superstition.

A priest was the one pressing the charges.

For the reverend fathers, who “although in the midst of confusion and shame, remained
steadfast in the peace of their hearts... glad to suffer for love of Christ,” this trial must have been
terrible. Meanwhile they all gathered in prayer, trusting in God’s help.

Anthony Zaccaria, as he contemplated “his little boat in danger in the midst of these
persecutions,“ called his followers together on October 4, 1534, the day before the trial.

In a memorable speech he made them face the alternative of leaving the congregation or of
persevering in the love of Christ Crucified, imitating the Apostles and Saint Paul, their guide and
father. Some eyewitnesses testified that “the fiery words coming out of that mouth, were such that
they were all caught on fire: so much so that all of them prostrated themselves in the midst of tears,
promising to persevere.”

The trial in front of the three authorities, civil, religious, and extraordinary, started the next
morning. The representatives were: for the Senate, Francis Casati; for the diocese, Giovanni M.
Tosi, as a substitute for Ippolito II d’Este; for the Inquisition, Melchiorre Crivelli. Men of utmost
integrity, they started “with great diligence to examine their (the Barnabites) actions.” As they
became aware of “their great simplicity and deep love for God and of spiritual things,” they
realized that the accusations had all been made up.

The crisis and the victorious outcome marked a turning point for the nascent order. It was
followed by a period of fruitful reflection and formulation. Meanwhile the holy founder availed
himself of the opportunity to outline for his sons an audacious program capable of withstanding
any kind of persecution.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi