Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Exposure is not enough to significantly impact the individual—at least not based on a
single trial (certain advertisements, or commercial exposures such as the “Swoosh”
logo, are based on extensive repetition rather than much conscious attention). In
order for stimuli to be consciously processed, attention is needed. Attention is
actually a matter of degree—our attention may be quite high when we read directions
for getting an income tax refund, but low when commercials come on during a
television program. Note, however, that even when attention is low, it may be
instantly escalated—for example, if an advertisement for a product in which we are
interested comes on.
Interpretation involves making sense out of the stimulus. For example, when we see
a red can, we may categorize it as a CokeÒ.
Several factors influence the extent to which stimuli will be noticed. One obvious
issue is relevance. Consumers, when they have a choice, are also more likely to
attend to pleasant stimuli (but when the consumer can’t escape, very unpleasant
stimuli are also likely to get attention—thus, many very irritating advertisements are
remarkably effective). One of the most important factors, however, is repetition.
Consumers often do not give much attention to a stimuli—particularly a low priority
one such as an advertisement—at any one time, but if it is seen over and over again,
the cumulative impact will be greater.
Subliminal stimuli. Back in the 1960s, it was reported that on selected evenings,
movie goers in a theater had been exposed to isolated frames with the words “Drink
Coca Cola” and “Eat Popcorn” imbedded into the movie. These frames went by so
fast that people did not consciously notice them, but it was reported that on nights
with frames present, Coke and popcorn sales were significantly higher than on days
they were left off. This led Congress to ban the use of subliminal advertising. First of
all, there is a question as to whether this experiment ever took place or whether this
information was simply made up. Secondly, no one has been able to replicate these
findings. There is research to show that people will start to giggle with
embarrassment when they are briefly exposed to “dirty” words in an experimental
machine. Here, again, the exposure is so brief that the subjects are not aware of the
actual words they saw, but it is evident that something has been recognized by the
embarrassment displayed.