Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1. Topic
A. Exigence
Mass shootings seem to be becoming more common than they should. Americans have
become so desensitized that we quickly forget about the impact that it has on us and future
generations. At what point do we say that it is enough? When did we get to the point where
human life has little value? UA Little Rock is trying to fight fire with fire (pun intended) with the
newly implemented concealed carry rule. Allowing people to carry guns on campus not only puts
innocent people at risk of violence, but it will also affect the way we all interact with each other.
They are essentially putting guns into the hands of would be attackers. The institution provides a
long list of rules and regulations, but fails to go into detail about how to make sure the
individuals who are carrying guns are following the rules. As far as a concrete game plan, it
Concealed carry refers to the act of carrying a concealed firearm or the legal right to do so
(Merriam-Webster, 2017). The law to carry concealed weapons on campus has been mandated in
a number of states recently, Arkansas being one of them. As a citizen, I see this as an attempt to
create a sense of security within the community. However, at a time when the United States
already has enough problems with respect to guns, now is not a good time to implement a law
such as this.
According to Erin Grinshteyn and David Hemenway (2015), doctors who write for The
American Journal of Medicine, the United States’ gun homicide rate was found to be 25.2 times
higher when compared to 23 other countries and 49.0 times higher when narrowed down to the
ages of 15-24. These age ranges reflect the ages of typical college students. This means that it is
likely that violence may erupt on our campus upon the implementation of the law on campus.
Guns on Campus 2
UA Little Rock now has not only college level students, but high school students as well which
falls into the age range of individuals that are more likely to be affected or participate in gun
violence.
It all comes down to state legislation and if law makers are making the right choices for
people in the general community and those on college campuses. People attend college in hopes
of gaining an education in a safe space. Since the Sandy Hook shooting in 2012 where 27 people
were killed, including the shooter, there have been 1,552 mass shootings in the U.S. (Lopez, G.,
Mark, R., Oh, S., 2017). A mass shooting can be defined as an incident where four or more
people have been injured or killed. So it stands to reason that increasing the amount of guns
circulating on college campuses could be detrimental to the safety of all administration, faculty,
At this rate the cycle of violence will only perpetuate. I hope this campaign is able to help
people see that a problem cannot be solved by allowing more opportunities for the problem to
occur. I would like people to think about the impact that our laws today will have on the future.
We should want our youth to grow up in such a tumultuous society. There is enough going on in
the general community and there is no need to create opportunities for violence on school
campuses as well.
B. Invention
This issue should way heavy on the hearts and minds of every citizen. Even if they have not
been directly affected. The people who were victims or the family of victims in mass shootings
did not plan for those events to happen. I think that the statistics alone should cause speculation
as to whether allowing open carry is good for the campus community, but if that is not enough
the fact that we have minors on campus and the complications with security should surely raise
Guns on Campus 3
eyebrows. Numbers do not lie and I think that many people believe that horrible things will not
happen to them, but the victims of the many mass shootings in the country probably did not think
anything would happen to them either. Most of the shootings happened while firearms were
prohibited from campus so allowing guns on campus could only make the situation worse.
In a way administrators are providing the setting and means to cause disaster. We have
campus police to protect the campus community. If allowing civilians to carry weapons to
campus is what will protect the community, the police force is completely obsolete. They are
paid for a reason and that reason is to protect us. One thing the institute should consider is
figuring out ways to fund more officers and better security measures so the safety of the
community is not left in the hands of every individual on campus. Those of us attending school
and professors as well have enough to worry about with classes and extracurricular activities.
Adding this extra layer puts even more pressure on both. Most of us walk around town with fear
already. College campuses and any school campus, for that matter, are supposed to be safe
spaces.
2. Audience Analysis
The general audience I am targeting would be individuals of the campus community and
those who closely work with the university. The ultimate goal is to create a sense of the security
for those attended school and those working for the university. The statistics show that there is a
definite problem with gun violence in our society. My target audience is trying to develop ways
They are individuals who have a direct connection with state laws and university rules
and regulations. I think that those creating laws such as concealed carry on college campus
Guns on Campus 4
believe that they are doing the right thing. However, I am not sure on what basis they are
drawing this belief from. I do understand the general concept of improving campus safety. As a
student of the university I have seen firsthand that we do not have enough campus police and if
I think my target audience is trying to get ahead of the problem to prevent an issue before
it happens. This is a noble act with respect to wanting to protect the campus community. They
are the ones that have to make the difficult decisions when it comes to how the university is run,
but paying attention to the concerns of the campus community could give them some insight into
what might work best for the individuals it would be directly affect. I think that because the topic
of guns is such as hot button subject in the United States, many people have become polarized
and have formed their own idea of what will and will not work for our society. Each side wants
to have the upper hand on the other. This in turn can overshadow the statistics that show how
The topic quickly becomes less about safety and more about politics. The college campus
is no place to have such divisive ideas. It is not a place where we distinguish ourselves as
Democrat or Republican or pro-gun control or anti-gun control. The central issue is making sure
that those who inhabit the campus have a sense of security and have the ability to rely on those
Honestly speaking the reasoning behind implementing the law is a bit muddy. If I had to
make an inference I would say that the decision is leaning more toward a Republican viewpoint.
This is to say that I do not know their exact political beliefs, but based on my knowledge of the
B. Segments
Guns on Campus 5
I. State Legislatures
State legislatures are those that directly affect the laws implemented on college
campuses. As law makers they should already know the statistics and percentages of violence in
our community due to guns or otherwise. I think that my campaign will show them that we are
all paying attention to what is happening around us and that we all was to develop a remedy for
the problem. If they know that students are paying attention I hope they would be more likely to
listen to our viewpoints since we are the ones who will be dealing with the issue at hand.
them to pay attention to the viewpoints of its students. Our confidence in administration is
important to how successful the university will be. If a large amount of people disagree with the
beliefs of those running the institution it could affect enrollment rates and graduation rates. I do
not know of anyone that wants to stay in a place where they do not feel safe. I think the issue
deserves a second look from administration before it completely goes into effect. University
administration have a better understanding of the community atmosphere and what will and will
3. Preliminary Strategy
A. Goals
The goal of my campaign is to get state legislatures and university administration to take a
second look at the implementation of this new law. I believe that there is a number of people
who feel this will take the university into the wrong direction. As a student I encourage others to
make their beliefs known and take stance on what is right and wrong. We should at least create a
healthy dialogue on the subject. Based on the things I have heard from other students and faculty,
Guns on Campus 6
I think that they feel the same way that I do. The ultimate goal is to get the law completely
reversed. I cannot understand how our gun violence problem can be fixed by allowing more guns
B. Obstacles
The major obstacle I face with my campaign is the strength of political beliefs behind this
topic. In general the subject of gun control has created such a divide among citizens in the
country and it is no less evident in the politics at a university. People was to create a world that is
best for them which can have a negative impact on those of us who do not have much say in was
laws are implemented. While I know that there is probably a large number of students and even
faculty who believe the law will be effective, I also know that there is a number of that believe
for the greater good we should create limitations where we can in order for everyone to feels
safe.
References
webster.com/dictionary/concealed%20carry
Guns on Campus 7
Grinshteyn, E., Hemenway, D. (2015). Violent death rates: the us compared with other high-
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.10.025.
Lopez, G., Mark, R., Oh, S. (2017). After sandy hook we said never again. And then we let 1,552
sandy-hook