Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER OVERVIEW
INTRODUCTION
Politics and economics are powerful, intertwined forces shaping public policies and
public lives. The view that politics and economics are closely linked is neither new nor
unique. Although the United States is often described as operating under a capitalist
economic system, it is more accurately described as a mixed economy, a system in which
the government, while not commanding the economy, is still deeply involved in
economic decisions. Because voters are sensitive to economic conditions, the parties
must pay close attention to those conditions when selecting their policies. Voters often
judge officeholders by how well the economy performs. This chapter explores the
economy and the public policies dealing with it.
Some economists challenge the BLS's definition of the unemployment rate (the
proportion of the labor force actively seeking work but unable to find a job). The
unemployment rate would be higher if it included "discouraged workers"—people who
have become so frustrated that they have stopped actively seeking employment. On the
other hand, if the unemployment rate included only those who were unemployed long
enough to cause them severe hardship, it would be much lower since most people are out
of work for only a short time.
People who are unemployed, worried about the prospect of being unemployed, or
struggling with runaway inflation have an outlet to express some of their dissatisfaction–
the polling booth. Ample evidence indicates that economic trends affect how voters make
up their minds on election day, taking into consideration not just their own financial
situation but the economic condition of the nation as well.
The impact of government on the economic system is substantial, but it is also sharply
limited by a basic commitment to a free enterprise system. The time when government
could ignore economic problems, confidently asserting that the private marketplace could
handle them, has long passed. When the stock market crash of 1929 sent unemployment
soaring, President Herbert Hoover clung to laissezfaire– the principle that government
should not meddle with the economy. In the next presidential election, Hoover was
handed a crushing defeat by Franklin D. Roosevelt. Government has been actively
involved in steering the economy since the Great Depression and the New Deal.
Monetary policy and fiscal policy are two tools by which government tries to guide the
economy. Monetary policy involves the manipulation of the supply of money and credit
in private hands. An economic theory called monetarism holds that the supply of money
is key to the nation’s economic health. The main agency for making monetary policy is
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("the Fed"). The Fed has three
basic instruments for controlling the money supply: setting discount rates for the money
that banks borrow from the Federal Reserve banks; setting reserve requirements that
determine the amount of money that banks must keep in reserve at all times; and
exercising control over the money supply by buying and selling government securities in
the market (open market operations).
Fiscal policy describes the impact of the federal budget—taxing, spending, and
borrowing—on the economy. Fiscal policy is shaped mostly by the Congress and the
president. Democrats tend to favor Keynesian economic theory, which holds that
government must stimulate greater demand, when necessary, with bigger government
(such as federal job programs). This theory emphasizes that government spending could
help the economy weather its normal fluctuations, even if it means running in the red.
Some scholars argue that politicians manipulate the economy for short-run advantage to
win elections; however, no one has shown that decisions to influence the economy at
election time have been made on a regular basis. The inability of politicians to so
precisely control economic conditions as to facilitate their reelection rests on a number of
factors, including the decentralized nature of economic policymaking in the United
States.
Government spends one-third of America's gross national product and regulates much of
the other two-thirds—a situation that stimulates a great deal of debate. Liberals tend to
favor active government involvement in the economy in order to smooth out the
unavoidable inequality of a capitalist system. Conservatives maintain that the most
AP U.S. Government and Politics – Chapter 17: Economic Policymaking - Overview 2
productive economy is one in which the government exercises a hands-off policy of
minimal regulation. Liberal or conservative, most interest groups seek benefits,
protection from unemployment, or safeguards against harmful business practices.
Competition in today’s economy is often about which corporations control access to, and
the profits from, the new economy. In the old and the new economy, Americans have
always been suspicious of concentrated power, whether it is in the hands of government
or business. In both the old economy and the new, government policy has tried to control
excess power. Since the early 1980s, a new form of entrepreneurship has flourished,
merger mania. Corporate giants have also internationalized in the postwar period. Some
multinational corporations, businesses with vast holdings in many countries-such as
Microsoft, GE, Coca- Cola, and AOL-Time/Warner-have annual budgets exceeding that
of many foreign governments. The purpose of antitrust policy is to ensure competition
and prevent monopoly. Antitrust legislation permits the Justice Department to sue in
federal court to break up companies that control too large a share of the market. It also
generally prevents restraints on trade or limitations on competition, such as price fixing.
Enforcement of antitrust legislation has varied considerably.
The most famous and controversial recent antitrusts case was filed against Microsoft,
makers of computer operating systems running nearly 90 percent of all American
computers. The Clinton administration originally filed an antitrust suit against Microsoft
but the Bush administration had other priorities and settled the suit. The turn-of-the-
century corporate scandals – not surprisingly – led to a new wave of calls for business
regulation. The main regulatory agency responsible for regulation of business practices is
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Congress passed a new law in 2002,
named the Oxley-Sarbanes Law after its House and Senate sponsors, which provided
tougher criminal penalties for stock fraud. It created a new Accounting Oversight Board
within the SEC to regulate accounting industry practices. President Bush fought it all the
way, but eventually decided that a veto would make him look soft on corporate crime.
Although business owners and managers complain about regulation, the government also
sometimes comes to the aid of struggling businesses. When a crucial industry falls on
hard times, it usually looks to the government for help in terms of subsidies, tax breaks,
or loan guarantees (as the Chrysler Corporation did when it was close to bankruptcy).
The federal government is also involved in setting policies for consumer protection. The
first major consumer protection policy in the United States was the Food and Drug Act
of 1906, which prohibited the interstate transportation of dangerous or impure food and
drugs. Today the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has broad regulatory powers
over the manufacturing, contents, marketing, and labeling of food and drugs. The
Federal Trade Commission (FTC), traditionally responsible for regulating trade
practices, also jumped into the business of consumer protection in the 1960s and 1970s,
becoming a defender of consumer interests in truth in advertising. Congress has also
made the FTC the administrator of the new Consumer Credit Protection Act.
Throughout most of the nineteenth century and well into the twentieth, the federal
government allied with business elites to squelch labor unions. Until the Clayton
Antitrust Act of 1914 exempted unions from antitrust laws, the federal government spent
more time busting unions than trusts. In 1935, Congress passed the National Labor
Relations Act (the Wagner Act), which guaranteed workers the right of collective
AP U.S. Government and Politics – Chapter 17: Economic Policymaking - Overview 3
bargaining—the right to have labor union representatives negotiate with management to
determine working conditions—and set rules to protect unions and organizers. The Taft-
Hartley Act of 1947 continued to guarantee unions the right of collective bargaining, but
also prohibited various unfair practices by unions. Section 14B of the Taft Hartley Act
law permitted states to adopt what union opponents call right-to-work laws. Such laws
forbid labor contracts from requiring workers to join unions to hold their jobs.
Liberals and conservatives disagree about the scope of government involvement in the
economy. Liberals focus on the imperfections of the market and what government can do
about them; conservatives focus on the imperfections of government.
Voters expect a lot from politicians, probably more than they can deliver on the economy.
The two parties have different economic policies, particularly with respect to
unemployment and inflation; Democrats try to curb unemployment more than
Republicans, though they risk inflation in so doing, and Republicans are generally more
concerned with controlling inflation.
CHAPTER OUTLINE