Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
outline
current flow
(a few mAs) I
100 µm
refractive
µm
0
30
profile
index
profile
field
P
N
active layer
0.2 µm (bulk)
9 nm (quant. well)
light
cleaved facet {110}
R=0.3-0.4
ENERGY
h ν
ENERGY
Absorption
h ν
Spontaneous emission
h ν
ENERGY
h ν
Stimulated emission
φ φ = φ gz
0 0 e
0 z
⇒ ⇒
gain region
dφ
φ = g dz
}
band
EF c
Eg
Fermi level hν
EF v Eg V
electrons
valence
valence
band
band
forward bias V
refractive
index
d ≈ 0.1-0.3 µm
forward bias
Double-heterojunction conduction band injected electrons
laser
energy
hν ≈ Eg
valence band holes
P N
InP GaInAsP InP
R1 L R2
Φ0 Exp(g-α)L
Φ0
R1R2Φ0 Exp(g-α)2 L
P ( mW )
Case of a Double-Hetero structure laser
2
Γgth = Γαint + (1-Γ)αcladd. + 1/L Ln(1/R)
-> threshold carrier density Nth(cm-3) 1
q integer
λ free space wavelength
L cavity length
n effective index
L = 400 µm
λ= 1494 nm
n = 3.53
dn/dλ = -0.12 µm-1
ne = 3.70
Effective group index
Δλq = 0.75 nm
Philippe Brosson/ESO/2005/Semiconductor Lasers and integrated devices/ 1- S.L. Operating principle/ 10
10
Threshold current density and
active layer thickness
The threshold current density is minimum around 0.15 micrometer
transition with D2 D2
InP
Eg highest gain
GaInAsP
h ν ≈ E g + E 1c + E 1hh GaInAs
E 1hh
E 2hh E 1lh
E 2lh
E 3hh ∆E v
E 3lh
valence
band Lz
multiple quantum well laser
2 nπ 2
for an infinitely deep well En = h *
2 m Lz
Lz = 5 nm Lz = 9 nm
λ = 1.4 µm λ = 1.55 µm
Philippe Brosson/ESO/2005/Semiconductor Lasers and integrated devices/ 1- S.L. Operating principle/ 14
14
Maximum material gain in a
quantum well laser
G(N) Data
Maximum Gain (cm-1) 2500 [Zielinski]
500
bulk GaInAs
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
N (10^18 cm-3)
T0 = 60 K
GaInAsP Eg hν Eg hν
1000 acceptor Heavy
T0 = 110 K 1 Hole 1
Heavy Δ
Hole Δ
hν
GaAs T0 = 120 K Light
Light
Hole 2 Hole 2
100
100 200 300 400 3 3
TEMPERATURE(K) Split-Off Split-Off
E E
k k
T
J th ( T ) ≈ J0 e T0 origin of the low T0 in GaInAsP
low T0 <-> high temperature • carrier leakage over barriers
sensitivity • Inter Valence Band Absorption
• Auger recombination
Philippe Brosson/ESO/2005/Semiconductor Lasers and integrated devices/ 1- S.L. Operating principle/ 16
16
Semiconductor Lasers operating principle :
outline
refractive
profile
index
profile
exponential field
Y
cosine
{
exponential
z Ey
Electric field
cladding nclad
θc
θ = sin -1 ( neff0 )
0 ncore ncore = 3.53
θ = sin -1 ( nclad ) θ = sin -1 ( neff1 )
nclad = 3.17
c ncore 1 d = 0.75 µm
ncore 2 modes TE0, TE1
θ (°) neff
critical angle θc for guided modes: TE0 79 3.46
total internal reflection θ > θc TE1 67 3.25
critical 64 3.17
ncore = 3.53
nclad. = 3.17
⊥ //
x
10 mW
Y 6 mW
θ⊥
half intensity
0.6 mW
contour
θ
//
R S
case of index coupling: Λ
the interaction between confinement layer
waves R and S is described grating layer
by a real coupling coefficient active layer
Κ(cm-1) confinement layer
Λ cladding layer
grating layer
[ Λ + Λ sin θ ] neff = q λ Bragg
active layer
λBragg cladding layer
θ = π/2 Λ=
2 n eff
first order grating (q=1)
λBragg ≅ 1.5 µm Λ ≅ 0.2 µm
threshold
threshold
Light intensity
(a rb. unit )
Light intensity
(a rb. unit )
Wavelength
Wavelength
Philippe Brosson/ESO/2005/Semiconductor Lasers and integrated devices/ 1- S.L. Operating principle/ 25
25
References (DFB lasers)
[1] Kogelnik H., Shank C. V., " Coupled-wave theory of distributed-feedback lasers ", J. Appl. Phys.,1972, 43, pp
2327-2335
[2 ] STREIFER, W., SCIFRES, D. R., BURNHAM, R. D., "Coupling coefficients for distributed feedback
single-and double-heterostructure diode lasers ", IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 1975, QE-11, pp. 867-873
[3] Kihara K., Soda H., Ishikawa H., Imai H. , "Evaluation of the coupling coefficient of a distributed feedback
laser with residual facet reflectivity ", J. Appl. Phys.,1987, 62, pp 1526-1527
[4] STREIFER, W., BURNHAM, R. D., SCIFRES, D. R. :"Effect of external reflectors on longitudinal modes of
distributed feedback lasers", IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 1975, QE-11, pp. 154-161
[5] Wang S., " Design considerations of the DBR injection laser and the waveguiding structure for integrated
optics " ,IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 1977, QE-13, pp. 176-186
[6] P. Brosson, C. Artigue, B. Fernier, D. Leclerc, J. Jacquet, J. Benoit, “A simple determination of the coupling
coefficient in DFB waveguide structures“, Electron. Letters, Vol. 24, pp 990, 1988.
InP p
InP n 0.2 µm
InP substrate n
B. FERNIER, L. GOLDSTEIN, A. OLIVIER, A. PERALES, C. STARCK andJ. BENOIT :" Multiquantum well
lasers at 1.5µm by GSMBE ",15th ECOC, SWEDEN, WeB 14 - 6, pp. 264 - 267, (1989)
100 µm
Simple laser structure to contact
test the lasers p GaInAsP
• no lateral current spreading p InP
• good determination of
- Jthreshold (kA/cm2) GaInAsP active
- external efficiency n InP
InP p, Be
W &B
p InP p InP InP n
GaInAsP active
n GaInAsP passive
InP n substrate
≈ n InP substrate ≈
n InP substrate
100 µm
∆n = 0.1- 0.3
∆n = 0.001- 0.01
Gain guided
(light is absorbed in
the unpumped region)
Index guided
Philippe Brosson/ESO/2005/Semiconductor Lasers and integrated devices/ 1- S.L. Operating principle/ 31
31
Buried double-hetero-structure laser
processing(1)
p+ GaInAsP
p InP
n InP
n InP substrate
p InP n InP
GaInAsP active
x xx x x
x x
x
p InP
n InP
≈ n InP substrate
≈
Philippe Brosson/ESO/2005/Semiconductor Lasers and integrated devices/ 1- S.L. Operating principle/ 33
33