Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
ADAM WAS NOT THE FIRST MANThe First Man
"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God
created he him; male and female created he them. And God
blessed them, and God said unto them. Be fruitful, and
multiply, and REPLENISH the earth..." (Genesis 1:27-28)
Replenish:
"I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was without form, and void;
and the heavens, and they had no light. I beheld the
mountains, and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved
lightly. I beheld, and, lo, THERE WAS NO MAN...I beheld,
and, lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness, and ALL THE
CITIES THEREOF WERE BROKEN DOWN AT THE
PRESENCE OF THE LORD, AND BY HIS FIERCE
ANGER...For this shall the earth mourn, AND THE
HEAVENS ABOVE BE BLACK..." (Jeremiah 4:23-28)
"For want and famine they were solitary; fleeing into the
wilderness IN FORMER TIME DESOLATE AND WASTE."
(Job 30:3)
Solomon relates:
David relates:
heavens also, and came down: and darkness was under his
feet. And he rode upon a cherub, and did fly: yea, he did fly
upon the wings of the wind. He made darkness his secret
place; his pavilion round about him were DARKWATERS
and thick clouds of the skies. At the brightness that was
before him his thick clouds passed, hail stones and coals of
fire. The Lord also thundered in the heavens, and the
Highest gave his voice: hail stones and coals of fire. Yea, he
sent out his arrows, and scattered them; and he shot out
lightnings, and discomfited them. Then the channels of
waters were seen, and the foundations of the world were
discovered at thy rebuke, O Lord, at the blast of the breath
of thy nostrils." (Psalms 18:7-15)
Isaiah said:
Again:
"And Cain went out from the presence of the Lord... And
Cain knew his wife..." (Genesis 4:16-17)
Now most "Ministers" will repeat that old, old, worn out
statement, one which cannot stand a close inspection, hence
6
I can just hear the atheists and agnostics cry out: "But Cain
has already broken God's Law once, so why wouldn't he do
so a second time." and well he might; and there is ample
evidence that he did sin time and time again, But now a
second, third and even a fourth person must consent to his'
breaking of God's Law.
His sister, his father (Adam) and his mother (Eve) must also
consent to this violation of God's Law, not just Cain: Which
would be consistent with the period of time involved, this
would do violence to the Scriptures. Thus this answer is
completely unacceptable.
Thus, the only logical answer to the question is: Not only
were there people on earth before, (Genesis 1:2) BUT
THERE WERE OTHERS PRESENT WHEN GOD,
“FORMED” A “MAN” TO TILL THE GROUND, AND WHO
WAS FIRST CALLED “ADAM” IN Genesis 2:19.
clergy say that Adam and Eve were the first man and
woman, but the Bible doesn’t, it merely says Adam was the
first White Man. Let’s look at the record.
“I beheld the earth and lo, it was without form and void; and
the heavens and they had no light. I beheld the mountains
and lo, they trembled and all the hills moved lightly. I
beheld and lo, there was no man and all the birds of the
heavens were fled. I beheld, and lo, the fruitful place was a
wilderness and ALL THE CITIES THEREOF WERE BROKEN
DOWN at the presence of Yahweh and by His fierce anger.
For this hath Yahweh said, The whole land shall be desolate;
yet will I not make a full end.”
“And Adam called his wife’s name Eve because she was the
mother of all living,” is a later interpolation, which was not in
the earlier manuscripts. (See Moffett’s Translation)
Upon being sent away, Cain found many other people, for
Genesis 4:17 records Cain not only married a wife, but built
a city. You don’t build a city for just two people. These were
the pre-Adamic races, mentioned in the latter part of
Genesis chapter 2.
very little if any serious Bible study. They simply let some
so-called member of the clergy tell them what is what.
After the birth of his first son, Enoch, Cain built a city
(Genesis 4:17). THERE CAN BE NO CITY WITHOUT
INHABITANTS AND THOSE WHO INHABITED THE CITY
WHICH HE BUILT WERE OBVIOUSLY THE INHABITANTS OF
THE LAND OF NOD, the same creating that had been given
to Adam as servants in the Garden of Eden. They were
driven forth with Adam, and became wanderers, which is the
meaning of the word NOD. These were a numerous people
who had been CREATED (Genesis 1:27) before the
FORMATION of Adam.
So God put a mark upon Cain(we are not told what it was)
10
Note that Jude first mentions the angels which kept not their
first estate. These may or may not have been the "sons of
God who married daughters of men." (There is a great deal
of argument on this among Bible scholars).
"And now I have given all these lands into the hands of
Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon, My servant; and the
11
"O Lord, Thou hast spoken against this place, to cut it off,
that none shall remain in it, neither MAN OR BEAST, but it
shall be desolate forever." (Jeremiah 51:62)
Adam was sent to take his place. It was Adam’s job to rule
the various nations and races of the earth as Yahweh’s
representative here, educating them in Yahweh’s laws and
enforcing obedience to those laws. These other races and
nations had been here long before Adam. Therefore the
Bible makes it unmistakably clear we are not all descended
from Adam and Eve, for there were other races on earth,
already old, already numerous, when Adam was “formed.”
Among these other races there are several who are simply
pre-Adamic and one at least, which is satanic. If you will
read the third chapter of Genesis, you will notice that,
immediately after the fall of Adam, when Yahweh required
them to answer what they had done, Yahweh condemned
Satan. The word mistranslated serpent is the Hebrew word
naw-khash, which literally means enchanter or magician.
Genesis 1:1-2:
Dick Fischer
P. O. Box 50111,
Arlington, VA 22205
For those who believe Genesis is historically accurate, Adam and Eve
were de facto historical figures, not symbolic representations
concocted by Moses or some other source. Indeed, the historicity of
the covenant couple is implied in the New Testament as well. It is
the purpose of this series of two articles to show that Adam appears
to have actually been an historic personality who had a moment and
a place in history. Furthermore, a specially created Adam dictated by
the Scriptures is entirely compatible with this thesis.
Mitochondrial Eve
Support for the "out of Africa" model can be derived from the
morphological diversity seen among black Africans today. African
peoples must therefore be very ancient, since presumably more time
should be required to produce such diverse populations from
common stock.
In spite of the contention, all parties can agree on one thing. The
proto-human fossil record begins in Africa, with a species now called
Homo erectus. After evolving in an African homeland, all concur,
Homo erectus migrated to Europe and Asia about 1 million years
ago. But after that, comes the Great Divide in paleoanthropology.3
Although two theories are competing for prominence, what has been
generally agreed upon by both molecular biologists and
paleoanthropologists is that all humans are biologically connected,
as evidenced by our DNA signatures4 (and confirmed in Acts 17:26).
When and under what circumstances ancient "Eve" got here is still
an open question.
Placing Adam's time frame in the distant past infers the Genesis
record must have omitted the names of hundreds of generations
who supposedly lived between Adam and Abraham. The rationale is
that the word "begat" does not necessarily mean "the immediate
father of," so the named patriarchs in Genesis 5 and 11 would be
only a representative sampling.5
The idea that Noah or Shem would have recorded ten forefathers,
detailing the age of each at the birth of their first son, or son of the
line of promise, and the age at death, while omitting hundreds of
intermediate generations, is beyond reason. There is no justification
for postulating intermediate, unnamed generations in Genesis 5.
Even if it were theoretically possible to insert extra generations, the
specific language used giving the age of the father at the birth of
each succeeding son prohibits inserting more time. So it is a moot
point. Archer maintains:
For the Bible scholar, it is not an easy task to accept as reality that
for the past 100,000 years there existed animals such as hominids
and that the skeletons of these ancient animals are near replicas of
those of modern man. But the fossil evidence is abundant and
irrefutable. It is folly, no it is counterproductive, to close one's eyes
to this fact.9
The task of finding some place to inject Adam into human history
can be simplified if we let the Bible do the talking. References to
tents, farming, and raising livestock suggest that Adam was not a
cave dwelling hunter-gatherer.
That is the proverbial smoking gun. Adam belongs after the old
Stone Ages, near the threshold of the Bronze Age, in a period called
the Chalcolithic, when traditional stone tools were being gradually
augmented by crude copper implements. Adam's descendants saw
22
Stone tools would have been of little use to Noah when he needed to
construct a massive watertight ark. Metal tools suitable for such an
undertaking would have only been available if the pre-flood
patriarchs lived in the period of what archaeologists call "modern
man;" that is, after 10,000 years ago. The Stone Age periods may
not have completely passed by Adam's day, but apparently human
history was well into the Bronze Age by the time of Tubal-cain and
Noah. And a late entry for Adam puts him in the company of
unrelated indigenous populations.
God answered Cain's plea by providing a sign for him (Gen. 4:15).
Cain's anxieties were justified as evidenced by the Lord taking action
to quiet his fears. We have no way of knowing what that sign or
mark was, but evidently it was necessary. From Cain's point of view,
the entire human race would have reached a dead end at that point
- unless there were other human beings about.14 There must have
been potentially hostile tribes of men in the vicinity. Cain was aware
of it, and the Lord's action attested to his justifiable fear.
And Cain went out from the presence of the Lord, and dwelt in the
23
shows us with ever increasing clarity that the purpose and function
of an image consists in representing someone," Edmond Jacob
writes in Theology of the Old Testament. "An image, that is to say a
statue of a god is the real presence of this god..."15
By using the term "God's image," the writer of Genesis may have
been alluding to the inner essence of us which is an integral part and
yet unseen - our soul, or our spirit. That may not have been an
altogether unique feature. We are in the dark with respect to Adam's
neighbors, even though Adam was apparently infused with
something which gave him a kind of kinship with the deity.
This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God
created man, in the likeness of God made he him; male and female
created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in
the day when they were created. And Adam lived an hundred and
thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image;
and called his name Seth.
As the first type of Christ, Adam may have had a similar mission.
Adam's task was probably to bring the word of God's kingdom to the
polytheistic heathen living all around him. We can only guess. We
can never know with certainty what it was Adam was supposed to
have done, or could have done had he not yielded to Satan's odious
deception so early on.
Turkey was excavated in the early 1960s. It was dated from 6500 to
5400 BC, and supported the concept of regional areas of Neolithic
development instead of a single nuclear area, such as a city.
The Hassuna culture takes its name from the mound of Tell Hassuna
in northwestern Iraq, and dates to 6000-5250 BC. Numerous
agricultural villages have been unearthed in Iran, Turkey, and
Palestine that were contemporary with the Hassuna.
The coarse pottery wares identified with the Hassuna were gradually
replaced by the remnants of the Samarra culture, starting about
5500 BC. At Tell-es Sawaan in Iraq alabaster female figurines were
discovered, along with ornaments of turquoise, carnelian,
greenstone, and copper. The presence of widely disparate materials
in one location indicates trading practices, and shows that trade
routes had already been established by that time.20
Dating from 5500 to 4700 BC, the Halaf culture succeeded, but
overlapped the Samarran. Halafian ceramics have been discovered
from the Mediterranean coast to Iran, though the Tigris-Euphrates
region south of Baghdad may have been uninhabited at this early
date.
The harsh, arid conditions might have caused the Halafians to make
only brief appearances in the south, or maybe they never got there
at all. The first inhabitants of the Tigris and Euphrates basin that can
be readily identified are the Ubaidans, succeeded by the Sumerians.
And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every
herb of the field before it grew: for the Lord God had not caused it to
rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground. But
there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of
the ground. (Genesis 2:5-6)
The creation of the plants is not alluded to here at all, but simply the
30
They too slide down the slippery slope to a woeful opinion. This was
"dependent upon rain," they decide, and conclude that the mist or
vapor in Genesis 2:6 was the "creative beginning of the rain itself""24
So even though the Bible states in the previous verse "for the Lord
God had not caused it to rain," nevertheless, rain it was, according
to this respected Bible commentary.
Provision [is] made for the irrigation of the garden. The reference is
implicitly to a system of canals, such as existed in Babylonia...26
31
The biblical city of Jericho, a center for salt trade, flourished during
the seventh millennium BC in the desert near the north end of the
Dead Sea. Water diverted from a spring nourished its fields.27
no citizenry"
Take any place - London, England, for example. Was there ever a
time when London was unoccupied" Well, yes, but no one could have
called it "London" then. The principle is the same concerning Eden.
Isaiah speaks of the Lord making the wilderness of Zion "like Eden"
(Isa. 51:3). Eden was apparently a place for people, and had to
have people before it could be called "Eden."
Who lived in Havilah (Gen. 2:11,12), and who mined the gold there"
Driver places Havilah "most probably" in the northeast of Arabia on
the west coast of the Persian Gulf, south of Egypt, and adds, "The
gold of Arabia was famed in antiquity."28 Also, the remains of mines
have been found in the Egyptian Nile Valley that were active over
30,000 years ago.29 There may be other ways to explain this verse,
but the implications are that gold mining preceded even Adam's Fall!
We may not know who was living in "the whole land of Ethiopia"
(Gen. 2:13), but sewing needles and stone vessels for grinding grain
into meal were found at el-Badari along the Nile dating to slightly
earlier than 5000 BC.30 This was about the same time that Hassuna
and Nineveh were established beside the Tigris (biblical Hiddekel) in
the region later known as Assyria.
(For a shadow of this see Psa. 89:9,10 and Isa. 51:9. ) The one
who "contrived the uprising" was the evil Tiamat's commander-in-
chief, Kingu:
In this account, the blood of Kingu was used, but in another legend
the blood is mixed with clay.36 Although somewhat gory in describing
the mode of their creation, the Accadians also seemed to be aware
they were not alone in the world. Frequent references are made to
the "black-headed" people.37
Adam's Bride
After naming the animals of the garden, there was still something
missing, "but for Adam there was not found a help meet for him"
(Gen. 2:20).
Available females must have been nearby, one of which Adam could
have chosen for his wife. We can deduce that from archaeological
history. From the Bible we can conclude that none was suitable, so
Adam had an operation resulting in Eve. As confirmation of an act of
special creation for the first covenant couple, Genesis 2:21-23 gives
us a graphic description. Paul confirms this mode of origination. "For
Adam was first formed (plasso in the Greek), then Eve" (1 Tim.
2:13).
Adam was banished from the garden after the Fall. "In the sweat of
thy face shall thou eat bread..." and, "...the Lord God sent him forth
from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was
taken" (Gen. 3:19,23).
Could we believe the first man on earth already knew how to use
fire, construct an oven, plant and harvest grain, mill it, and prepare
the flour for baking" If not, then we may conclude that Adam was
not the first man in the biological sense.
Notes
1
Ann Gibbons, "Mitochondrial Eve: Wounded But Not Dead Yet,"
Science (14 August, 1992), 873.
2
Ibid., 875.
3
Ibid., 875.
4
James Shreeve, "Argument Over A Woman," Discover (August
1990), 52-59.
5
Robert C. Newman and Herman J. Eckelmann, Genesis One and the
Origin of the Earth (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1977), 111.
6
Lloyd R. Bailey, Genesis, Creation, and Creationism (New York:
Paulist Press, 1993), 130.
7
Paul H. Seely, Inerrant Wisdom: Science & Inerrancy In Biblical
Perspective (Portland: Evangelical Reform, Inc. , 1989), 17.
8
Gleason L. Archer, A Survey of Old Testament Introduction
(Chicago: Moody Press, 1974), 203.
9
Gerald L. Schroeder, Genesis and the Big Bang (New York: Bantam
Books, 1990), 175.
10
John E. Pfeiffer, The Creative Explosion (New York: Harper & Row,
Publishers, 1982), 121.
11
From an exhibit in the Smithsonian Institute in Washington D. C.,
July 25, 1993.
12
Jacquetta Hawkes, The Atlas of Early Man (New York: St. Martin's
Press, 1976), 63.
13
John Gowlett, Ascent to Civilization (New York: Alfred A. Knopf,
Inc., 1984), 180.
14
Dick Fischer, "The Bible Proves Creationism is Wrong," The
37
29
Pierre M. Vermeersch, Etienne Paulissen, and Philip Van Peer,
"Palaeolithic chert exploitation in the limestone stretch of the
Egyptian Nile Valley," African Archaeological Review (1990) 8: 77-
102.
30
Hawkes, The Atlas of Early Man, 47.
31
"Semites" is the term archaeologists and historians use to denote
not only descendants of Shem, but also descendants of Japheth,
Ham, or any of Adam's line in the pre-flood period (if a person such
as Adam ever existed, or there was ever an event such as the
Flood.) Thus, Canaanites spoke a "west semitic" language,
notwithstanding Canaan was the son of Ham, according to the Bible.
One might think "Hamites" would have communicated in a "hamitic"
tongue. But the secular world does not recognize the Bible as being
historically accurate. Therefore, "Semites" are universally
recognized. "Adamites," "Hamites," and "Japhethites" are not, shall
we say, "politically correct."
32
Samuel Noah Kramer, "Sumero-Akkadian Interconnections,"
Genava, n. s., 8 (1960), 272-273.
33
James B. Pritchard, Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old
Testament (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1955), 60-72.
34
Ibid., 67.
35
Ibid., 68
36
Alexander Heidel, The Babylonian Genesis (Chicago: The University
of Chicago Press, 1942), 56.
37
Pritchard, Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old
Testament, 70.
38
Ibid., 69.
39
John Wiester, The Genesis Connection (Nashville: Thomas Nelson
Publishers, 1983), 187.
39
They stated that in the olden days, the ancestors carved stones as
means of communication and also a way to give honour to great
men and women who made great achievements in the society, and
these stones were named after people, whom they were dedicated
to.
"Likewise, the story of Adam and Eve has links with Igbo tradition
through remnants of Igbo language found in all words connected to
Adam and Eve story. For instance, Hebrew name for Adam as first
man was 'Esh,' which is also spelt Eesh/Eshi/Ishi. The Bible says that
Eve's name 'Ish-she or Esh-she' because she was taken out of the
man.
This means that 'Esh' and 'Esh-she' means in Igbo 'Taken from the
dwarf (as in she-puta-to pull out). She also means in Igbo 'to
become less, 'to reduce,' implying that by creation of woman from
man, man became weaker or less than he was originally. Adam's
popular name by which he is known throughout the world has a
straight meaning-Adaa m 'I have fallen, I have become less than my
original self' but not so in Ikom language," they stated.
"Also the name of Adam's second son, Abel, who was murdered by
his elder brother, and who became known as the 'lamb that was
slain' seems to have been derived from Igbo word, Ebula meaning
41
lamb. (We heard of the blood of Abel being compared with the blood
of Jesus 'the Lamb of God').
Cain, who killed his brother, was banished and he began to roam the
earth and took the name Amakandu (condemned to life of roaming),
but as time went on, some of his children got tired of roaming and
decided to build settlements for themselves. And accordingly they
changed their names to Dunu, meaning 'settle' or 'sit' in Igbo,
revealing that the first generation of humans on earth spoke Igbo.
In fact, there is a clan in Anambra State that goes by the name
Dunukofia, meaning that to settle is better than to roam."
It was noted in the book that if "the Bible tells us that God's first
instruction to humankind was written on stone, the Igbos have an
oral tradition published under the title "Ndi Ichie Akwa mythology or
folklore tradition of Ndigbo by I.N.C. Nwosu, which narrates that God
gave a set of 10 laws on stone to his people called Ndiichie Akwa,
which were symbolised by 10 fingers etched on stone. This has a
similarity to Hebrew story of the laws given to Moses by God.
The story says that after the world was destroyed by the great flood,
the children of the great ancestor of Igbo people were instructed by
God to return to the center of the earth where he and his lineage will
dwell with God in peace and tranquility.
They continued: "We believe that Ikom (and its monoliths) was the
destination of the journey of the children of Noah as indicated in the
Biblical Genesis and that the people who journeyed to West Africa,
were a branch of Ham's children, possibly Canaan and that the
monoliths served as a landmark for the new immigrants.
Acholonu and his co-authors noted however that the monoliths were
not the only stone writings associated with the Igbo, since in the
British Isles, stones have been found bearing Igbo language
42
They stated that apart from the Igbo based ancient Ogam
inscriptions found in British Isles, another proof that Igbo people
lived in and colonised the British Isles in pre-historic times is the
presence of numerous Igbo words in English language such as doro
(draw), Mmanwu (Man); Saa (Say), Ukwe (Choir), Ekpere (prayer),
Mfe (fair), Okuko (Cock), Mmiri (Marine), ga (go) among others.
first man. But the truth is that the Bible nowhere says that Adam
was the first man. Yes, I know that most of the preachers say that,
but the Bible doesn't. It merely says that Adam was the first WHITE
man. Let's look at the record.
Next the Bible tells of the creation of men in the plural. In Genesis
1:26-28 is says "Male and female created He THEM" and God told
these people "Be fruitful and multiply and replenish the earth"
(1:28). "Plenish" is an obsolete English word meaning "to fill" and
you cannot RE-plenish what was never plenished, or filled before.
In the next chapter, Genesis 2 we find THE ADAM (In the singular)
created. The Hebrew word "aw-dawm" (rendered "Adam" in English)
is from a root word meaning "to show blood in the face" or "of a
ruddy complexion" --a word obviously not applicable to the dank
races, which we also know from scientific evidence to be much older
than the White Race.
46
Bible scholars know that Genesis 3:20---"And Adam called his wife's
name "Eve" because she was the mother of all living." This is a later
interpolation which was not in the earlier manuscripts. (See Moffatt's
Translation.)
The 4th chapter of Genesis records the birth of Cain and Abel. In the
Hebrew the wording suggests that they were twins. No other child of
Eve is mentioned until the birth of Seth when Adam was 130 years
old--certainly long after the birth of Cain and Abel which most
scholars say was over 100 years earlier. Yet when Cain killed Abel,
and in punishment was driven out of the land he complained to God
that "any one that findeth me shall slay me." (4:14)
Upon being sent away Cain found many other people. Genesis 4:17
records that Cain not only married a wife, but built a city. These
were the pre-Adamite races mentioned in the latter part of Genesis.
The Garden of Eden was not a plantation of ordinary trees and
shrubs. God did nothing so foolish as to make a special creation just
to have a man to wield shovel and pruning shears when He already
had millions of pre-Adamite peoples available for that sort of work.
We are told that the Garden of Eden contained "the tree of the
knowledge (or experience) of good and evil". No tree of the forest
has any knowledge or experience of either good or evil. And Ezekiel
31 says: "Behold, the Assyrian was a cedar in Lebanon, with fair
branches and a shadowing bough and of an high stature. Therefore
his height was exalted above all the trees of the field and his boughs
were multiplied, and his branches became long and all the fowls of
heaven made their nests in his boughs, under his branches did all
the beasts of the field bring forth their young, and under his shadow
dwelt all great nations ... THE CEDARS IN THE, GARDEN OF GOD
could not hide him: the fir trees were not like his boughs, and the
chestnut trees were not like his branches; NOR ANY TREE IN THE
GARDEN OF GOD. WAS LIKE UNTO HIM IN HIS BEAUTY. I have
made him fair by the multitude of his branches: SO THAT ALL THE
TREES OF EDEN, THAT WERE IN THE GARDEN OF GOD ENVIED
HIM". Obviously, the trees in the Garden of God in Eden were
"family trees" of races and nations who admired and envied the
early Assyrian Empire. These made up the "garden" that Adam was
to cultivate. That is Satan had been what we might call the
superintendent of this planet, to rule it in obedience to God until he
47
Therefore, the Bible makes it unmistakably clear that we are not all
descended from Adam and Eve, for there were other races on earth,
already old, already numerous, when Adam was created. And among
these other races there are several who are simply pre-Adamic, and
one, at least, which is Satanic. If you will read the third chapter of
Genesis, you will notice that immediately after the Fall of Adam
when God required them to answer what they had done God
condemned Satan.
The same Hebrew word for "seed" is used in both cases. Satan was
to have just as literal "seed" or descendants as Eve did. God's own
word being pledged to this, we must expect to find it actually
happening, and we do.
Again, in John 6:70-71 Jesus had been talking with His 12 disciples
and we read: "Jesus answered them 'Have not I chosen you twelve
and one of you is A DEVIL?' He spake of Judas Iscariot the son of
Simon: for he it was that should betray Him being one of the
twelve." And again you should read carefully the eighth chapter John
where Jesus told those who hated Him, "Ye are of your father the
devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do." He was not being
vulgarly abusive in either of these cases, for He never resorted to
name calling for abuse. He did call some of them "hypocrites"
---which they truly were. His statement was precisely accurate. He
did call some of them "serpents, children of vipers"--which, again,
was accurate. Long before this they had adopted the serpent as a
symbol of Satan, that is why their tradition mad given the word
naw-khash" the translation "serpent", when it really means
"enchanter". Jesus, therefore, was telling them that they were of
their father the devil (or serpent, if they preferred that word). In this
He was simply stating a biological fact with scientific precision, and
identifying the persons of this ancestry.
Whenever someone tells you that the Bible is in conflict with what
modern science has proved true, don't you believe it. The things that
many preachers teach are in conflict with scientific truth, as we all
know; but these preachers are equally in conflict with the Bible. Go
back to the Bible not to any man made doctrines and double check it
for accuracy of translation.
The conflict
The Fundamental Christian says that Adam, who was created around
6,000 years ago according to biblical chronology, was the first man,
49
So all those who do accept the trinity are just demonstrating how
easy they are to brainwash. And the Muslim suicide bombers of the
last days are busy showing us just how dangerous religious
brainwashing can be. Most, if not all people with faith, throw away
their reason when they join a religion and just accept the doctrine of
their church or mosque or synagogue etc. So one could argue that
every Christian who believes in the trinity is one step away from
being a suicide bomber. But Jesus did not command us to become
brainwashed idolaters of the lame spiritual understandings of lazy
control freak priests or rabbis or imams. He said:
50
37 You must love Jehovah your God with your whole heart and with
your whole soul and with your whole mind (Matthew 22).
And the first living stone that Jesus laid in the Christian church
(Peter), said...
This Revelation requires brain power and of course the world is being
dumbed down further and further every day at the very time that
the Revelation is occurring because there is a battle that we are the
victims of between the holy angels and the deadly demons. But we
can avoid being a casualty of this war if we open the eyes of our
mind.
The Resolution
18 For truly I say to you that sooner would heaven and earth pass
away than for one smallest letter or one particle of a letter to pass
away from the Law [of God, the whole bible] by any means and
not all things take place (Matthew 5).
4 This is a history of the heavens and the earth in the time of their
being created, in the day that Jehovah God [YHWH Elohim] made
earth and heaven (Genesis 2).
7 And Jehovah God [YHWH Elohim qualifying the ambiguous
verses 27 and 28] proceeded to form the man out of dust from the
ground and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man
came to be a living soul (Genesis 2).
Now at first sight this looks like a rather repetitive account of the
creation of mankind. But let us examine these 3 verses a bit closer
since they may just hold the secret to our very existence within
them. Here is a comparative table of the two successive accounts of
our creation...
Adam was created by God without the involvement of his wife, the
holy spirit, and made in the image of God alone, being a direct first
generation son of God, like Satan was. God is perfect, the angels are
not, these are therefore two different images and therefore two
different creations.
Pre-adamic man was not blessed, Adam was. Adam was blessed
with procreating power in order that he could fill the earth, and with
authority over every living being including the pre-adamics on the
earth. Adam did actually fill the earth, the pre-adamics did not.
angels at the same time that they were born as humans. They were
born again when they were born. Therefore like the angels they
were sterile unless activated on a per child basis like God (which is
the case with all judicially living beings - who follow the pattern of
Abraham and Sarah in concpetion). And like the angels they did not
marry...
But Adam who was made in God's image but not said to be made in
his likeness, was not born again when he was born. Rather he was
born again aged 30 as an archetype of Michael's entrance into Jesus
and Immanuel's exit into his associated angel - see I17 and U41.
The pre-adamics did not die, since death came through Adam and
since angels do not die other than through a capital sin in which case
they go to Tartarus, which is the first death for them. Their human
bodies died but their spirits were raptured at that time into their
associated angelic bodies. Presumably there was no reason for their
bodies to grow old, so they grew to maturity and remained in a
steady state until they were raptured we imagine. They became the
angels that they really were at their 'death'.
Although they did not actually fall asleep in death but were
54
6 Who gave himself a corresponding ransom over all, [this is] what
is to be witnessed to at its own particular times (1 Timothy 2).
Adam was made in God's image in the sense that he was alone
without brothers or sisters or family in his form in the Garden for 19
years, and in fact his life followed the pattern of God's early life - see
U41. God likewise was alone before he created any other life forms.
Furthermore being a son of God he has an inheritance which is to be
a God, even a God to the angels, just as the angels and indeed all
sons of God can aspire to be Gods one day just like their father.
They merely have to grow up first!
God'.
7 When the morning stars joyfully cried out together, And all the
sons of God began shouting in applause? (Job 38).
6 For who in the skies can be compared to Jehovah? Who can
resemble Jehovah among the sons of God? (Psalm 89)
43 Be glad, O heavens, together with him, and let all the angels of
God worship him. Be glad, you nations, with his people, and let all
the sons of God strengthen themselves in him, (LXXBagster
Deuteronomy 32).
Demons here are evening stars with Satan being the moon, and
angels are morning stars with Jesus being the Sun. Furthermore
female Christians eventually become sons of God, not daughters of
God.
9 Happy are the peacemakers since they will be called 'sons of God'
(Matthew 5).
26 You are all, in fact, sons of God through your faith in Christ Jesus
(Galatians 3).
22 And you must not lie down with a male the same as you lie down
with a woman. It is a detestable thing (Leviticus 18).
(Romans 1).
Well we read in Genesis that the demons came down and married
women before the flood and had children with them...
2 then the sons of the [true] God began to notice the daughters of
men, that they were good-looking; and they went taking wives for
themselves, namely, all whom they chose (Genesis 6).
These are not the actions of asexual neuter beings. These angels
were not said to come down because they wanted to procreate, they
were said to come down because the women looked good. So they
must have felt some kind of sex drive. In fact their sex drive was so
strong that they sinned, by coming down here and leaving their
proper dwelling place of the heavens...
6 And the angels that did not keep their original position but forsook
their own proper dwelling place he has reserved with eternal bonds
under dense darkness for the judgment of the great day (Jude).
57
Jesus adds to the debate with his answer to the sadducees (who say
there is no resurrection) about marriage in the Kingdom of God...
24 Jesus said to them: Is not this why you are mistaken, your not
knowing either the Scriptures or the power of God?
25 For when they rise out of [the] dead [ones] neither do they
marry () nor are they given in marriage (), but
are as angels in the heavens (Mark 12).
In all three accounts of his answer we read that Jesus made the
distinction between men marrying and women being given in
marriage and then compared this situation to that of the angels. We
see that 'sons of this system' can be given in marriage and are
therefore female. We also see from verse 36 that women who are
resurrected as sanctified born again human women are called 'sons
of the resurrection' and 'sons of God'. So 'sons of God' can in fact be
human daughters of God with associated angels. The word 'sons'
really is used to mean offspring. This site uses the term 'sons of the
58
1AC', to mean men and women and children with a faith that makes
them beneficiaries of the first Abrahamc covenant - see I29. So
nothing Jesus said forces angels to be neuter.
Jesus did not actually answer the question as to who would get the
woman in the Kingdom, he just said there would be no marriage for
those who have risen from the dead. This does not mean there will
be no marriage in the kingdom of God. It means there will be no
marriage amongst those who are not judicially dead and are
therefore as angels in heaven. There will be no marriage for those
who are spirit baptised, those who are born again, those who have
associated angelic bodies - see I12.
It is fine to be married for a long as you live, if you are not going to
live for long. For death ends the marriage 'till death us do part'. But
it is no good getting married if you are going to live indefinitely or
forever. So angels do not get married, as such a thing would be a
monstrous commitment. Likewise the saints do not get married in
the Kingdom of God, but those who are not saints do.
Now Jesus is saying two things. He says that being given in marriage
does not occur in heaven and he says that marrying does not occur
in heaven. So he is telling us that there are both male and female
angels. For it is females who are given in marriage and males who
marry. But the power of Jesus' seeming labouring of this point is
that there exist both sexes in the heavens...
12 For the word of God is alive and exerts power and is sharper than
any two-edged sword and pierces even to the dividing of soul and
spirit, and of joints and [their] marrow, and [is] able to discern
thoughts and intentions of [the] heart (Hebrews 4).
angels in this respect, then we must have male and female angels.
The slam dunk proof that there are female angels and indeed angelic
families is in Ephesians...
Using the bible code to prove for a fact that there are male
and female angels
The only part of the bible code that we cover in this introductory
book/website is the Binary Question Principle. It says...
16 You are opening your hand and satisfying the desire of every
living thing (Psalm 145).
And this scripture plainly does not refer to this system since the
reader will not need to be told by the writer that for the most part
Satan is not satisfying but is rather frustrating the desire of every
living thing at present. But in the next system, God will satisfy all of
us...
4 And he will wipe out every tear from their eyes, and death will be
no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore. The
former things have passed away (Revelation 21).
There are two other aspects of the code which absolutely nail the
existence of male and female angels. We will just state them here
for completeness.
So yes, there are male and female angels. The pre-adamics are in
the image of these angels in the respect of Gender. In fact Gender is
a tutor leading to love. God himself is neither male nor female
because his love is perfect. We are imperfect in our love, so God
made us and our brothers and sisters, the angels, and the pre-
adamics, male and female, to teach all of us the surpassing value of
love. Actually to teach us all the surpassing value of loving just one
person.
Sex is a tutor to love. All beings are sexual both human and angelic
until they become Gods. Gods have perfect love and therefore need
no tutor and therefore are asexual. Even if you hate all of your
brothers, there will be some woman somewhere that you love.
Regrettably in this system she may not love you. But nonetheless
the lesson in the second commandment, to love your brother, is
there. In a similar vein one needs both a king and a priest until one
has fully grasped the first commandment we think. Although born
again sons of God would appear to be able to be both?
5 Then the angel who was speaking with me went forth and said to
me: Raise your eyes, please, and see what this is that is going forth.
62
phrase 'male and female he created them' and the first creation of
'man' is not so specified. Adam and Eve were told to fill the earth,
and pre-adamic man were not told to fill the earth. Man, pre-adamic
man, did not have a wife...
The scripture does not say: But for the man, there was found no
helper as a complement for him. So Adamic man had a wife, but
again pre-adamic man had no wife. So pre-adamic man could not
directly procreate and did not get married, just like the angels. We
initially thought that this meant he was asexual. But archaeology is
against that hypothesis. There are cave paintings of men and
women having sex which predate Adam. So then we theorized that
pre-adamic man was male and female and sexual but sterile. This
would certainly fit the scriptural constraints that we have discovered
for him. Pre-adamic man would be male and female in form and in
character but not reproductively male and female. The big change
with Adam and Eve would then have been the capability for
independent human-human reproduction. Prior to that humans were
made some other way and could not reproduce without assistance
from the angels. Although Eve only became fertile after she sinned,
since sexual reproduction is the preserve of the dead.
23 And he said, the man: This is at last bone of my bones and flesh
of my flesh
This one will be called woman, because from Man [#y)] this one was
taken (Genesis 2).
pillars of the church of Jesus' body. Peter was the first bone of Jesus'
body, and start of his wife - see I35. Although the numbers we have
of these blocks are different. For most people have 23 Chromosomes
and 24 ribs. But with one rib removed you would have 23 ribs. So
the bones are the chromosomes and the flesh is the entire body,
which is built from the genetic material in the chromosomes.
Chromosomes and bones can be counted, flesh cannot be counted.
24 That is why man [#y)] will leave his father and his mother and
he must stick to his wife and they must become one flesh.
25 And both of them continued to be naked, the man and his wife,
and yet they did not become ashamed (Genesis 2).
Now Adam left God and the Holy spirit and broke God's law and
stuck to his wife. He fulfilled the prophecy in Genesis 2:24-25. So he
had a mother. So Adam was a direct child of Jehovah in Humaniah
and Matriach. In other words he was a brother of Satan, a first
generation human angel. Whereas the pre-adamics were merely
children of an angelic pair, a male and a female angel.
The reason why Eve said, on giving birth to Cain: I have produced a
man with the aid of Jehovah (Genesis 4:1). Is that Cain was
produced pre-adamically/angelically which method of procreation
needed God's help. Satan impregnated Eve before she sinned
66
In the Kingdom of God, those who are born again are 'as angels in
heaven'. They do not get married...
So they too are like Jesus and Adam and the pre-adamics. So now
we can see that the born again post adamics of the Kingdom of God
are in the same reproductive situation as the pre-adamics and the
non adamics and the angels. It is only the judicially 'dead' post
adamics who procreate sexually and who get married.
Male and Female pre-adamics were sterile, since they were 'not
male and not female' in the reproductive sense. For the scripture
says, referring to the man and the woman...