Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
EXPERIMENT 1
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY(GC):
OPTIMIZATION OF FLOW RATE AND
COLUMN TEMPERATURE
NAME :
MATRIC NO :
GROUP :3
DATE OF EXPERIMENT:
LECTURER’S NAME
INTRODUCTION
METHADOLOGY
Instrument set-up :
Injection port : Split (40:1)
Injection port temperature: 250°C
Column temperature : 210°C
Carrier gas flow rate : 30 cm sec-1
Detector temperature :250°C
0.4 µL standard mixture was injected isothermally at 210°C at carrier gas flow
rate of 30 cm sec-1. The flow rate then increased to 50 cm sec-1. The system was
allowed to equilibrate for few minutes and the standard mixture was injected again.
The same procedure was repeated at flow rate of 70cm sec-1. The most optimized flow
rate was determined.
The standard mixture was injected at the optimal carrier gas flow rate using a
lineae temperature ramp from 100°C to 290°C at optimal rate. The separation of
compound was commented.
Each methyl ester was injected individually to identify the various compounds in
the standard mixture by using the optimized GC conditions
Resolution, Rs = tR3-tR2
1/2 (W2+W3)
Average
Standard compound Injection Retention time
retention time
1 1.929
Methyl laurate 1.930
2 1.931
1 2.685
Methyl myristate 2.6855
2 2.686
1 4.213
Methyl palmitate 4.2135
2 4.214
1 6.698
Methyl linoleate 6.6985
2 6.699
1 7.258
Methyl stearate 7.259
2 7.260
In the experiment, the effect of carrier gas flow rate on isothermal GC separation
of methyl esters and the effect of column temperature on the isothermal GC
separation was studied to determine the optimun condition to separate standard
compound in methyl esters. For the effect of carrier gas flow rate on isothermal
separation, the methyl esters was separated at same temperature which is 210 °C and
the manipulated variable is the carrier gas which the separation was evaluated at
different flow rate. The flow rate studied was 30 cm/s, 50 cm/s and 70 cm/s. From the
observation the retention time of peak 3 and peak 3 with their width was used to
calculate the resolution. At flow rate 30 cm/s the resolution gives 31.9199, at flow
rate 50 cm/s the resolution gives 31.1270 and at 70 cm/s the resolution gives 24.9918.
From the resolution it shows that peak 2 and peak 3 achieved base line separation
since the resolution > 1.5. but the optimum flow rate is 70 cm/s since the higher the
resolution results in longer retention time so the separation was not efficient. Since the
retention time for separation at flow rate 70 cm/s is the shortest so it is the optimum
flow rate.
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
3. News Medical Life Science (n.d.) Capillary HP-5ms GC/MS Columns from
Agilent. Retrieved from https://www.news-medical.net/Capillary-HP-5ms-GCMS-
Columns-from-Agilent