Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
FATIGUE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TH9k9fWaFrs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVw5g1s06ow
http://vimeo.com/24925550
F
s Z
A
PLANE BENDING
M
s Z yˆ
I
ROTATING BENDING
STRESS RANGE 2S a
M S
s Z yˆ STRESS RATIO R
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52knsY5AWIc
I Ŝ
PART II FATIGUE 5
2 STRESS – LIFE RELATIONSHIPS
a) b)
a) LINEAR – LINEAR
b) LOG – LINEAR
c)
c) LOG - LOG
OTHER MATERIALS
Ultimate Tensile Strength, UTS, (MPa) Ultimate Tensile Strength, UTS, (MPa)
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FATIGUE STRENGTH AND ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH APPLIES
FOR A WIDE RANGE OF LOW AND MEDIUM STRENGTH VERSIONS OF MATERIALS ( R W Hertzberg).
STEEL ALUMINIUM
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FATIGUE STRENGTH AND ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH APPLIES
FOR A WIDE RANGE OF LOW AND MEDIUM STRENGTH VERSIONS OF MATERIALS. WHERE THE
MONOTONIC STRENGTH IS HIGH THE FATIGUE LIMIT IS A LOWER % OF u.
Sa = a N b
b = SLOPE =
Log S a 10e - Log S a 103
Log 10e Log 103
1
Log
S a 103
e - 3
S a 10
e
Log 10e Log 10o
Log a Log S a 10e LogSa 103 Log S a 10e
Log 10e Log 103
e
Log S 10e Log S 103 Log S 10e
a e 3 a a
1
3 S 10 3 e e 3
e
3 e 3 e 3 Log a
Log S a 10 Log S a 10
e
3
S a 10e
1
e 3
S 103 e
a a
a
S 10e 3
S a 103 0.9 u S a 106 0.5 u
1 S 10 3
1 0.9
Log Log
S 10
a u
b
e 3 a6 3
e
0.5 u
0.085
1
1
0.9 u
S 10 3 e
e 3 6 6 3
a
a 3
S 10e 0.5 u
3
a
1.62 u Sa = 1.62u N-0.085
1 0.9 u
b Log 0.0704
8 3 0.4 u
1
0.9 u 8 8 3
a 1.464 u
0.4 u 3
Sa = 1.464uN-0.0704
C L C D C S CO
Sao
Sao
Kf
(1) Ĉo 1.1 FOR UNIFORM TENSION BARS (NO INTERNAL DEFECTS)
(2) COMPRESSIVE RESIDUAL STRESSES IN SURFACE
(3) COMPRESSIVE RESIDUAL STRESS AND HIGHER u IN THE CASE. SUBSTRATE IS UNCHANGED.
DETERMINE:
SHAFT DIAMETER SO THAT IT WILL SURVIVE 106 CYCLES
S – N EQUATION
LIFE IF F = 8kN
u OF THE STEEL FOR LIFE OF 2.5 X 105 CYCLES WHEN F = 8kN.
AT SUPPORT
M 1200 x 64 d 12223
REF = ŷ = x = (Pa )
4
I πd 2 d3
12223
3
302 106 d 0.097
d
Co = CL = Kf = 1
S'ao(106) = (0.5x u)x 1 x 0.85 x 0.9 x 1 / 1
= 0.382u
S'ao = a Nb
1 S ao
LOG
103
b
e 3 10e
S ao
1 0.9 u
LOG 0.124
6 3 0.382 u
1
S 10 3 e e 3
ao S’ao = 2.12 uN-0.124
a )
S 10e 3
ao ) --------(1)
0.9 u
2
2.12 u
= 2332 N-0.124 (MPa) )
0.382 u
M̂
REF = ŷ
I
1600 x 64 0.031
x 547 MPa
x 0.0314 2
Kf
FATIGUESTRENGTH OF UNNOTCHEDBAR
Fao 106 (1)
S 'ao 106 (1)
FATIGUESTRENGTH OF NOTCHED BAR
Fao 106 (2) S ' ao 106 (2)
Kf IS USUALLY IN THE RANGE 0.7 Kt - 0.95 Kt
1
q = NOTCH SENSITIVITY FACTOR FOR THE MATERIAL q
1
r
r = NOTCH RADIUS
u 1624 x 106
- FROM GRAPH OF Log 6
[ Dowling p 407]
586 x 10
Kt
Kt = 2.99 ESDU 69020 Fig. 5.4
u 1624 x 106
Log 6
586 x 10
CALCULATE:
1100 1624
586
= 22.5m
1
q 0.9
22.5 x 10 6
1
2 x 10 3
K f
0 .95
Kf = 1 + 0.9 (2.1 - 1) = 1.99 K
t
S ao 106
C L C D CS
S ao
Kf
1 x 0.86 x 0.69
106
S ao
0.15
550 x 164MPa u
1.99
200 x 103 F x 32
75.5 x 103 F ( Pa )
x 0.033
M 2.1 x 0.2 F x 32
ˆ Z Kt yˆ 158.4 x 103 F ( Pa )
I x 0.03 3
For yield
ˆ Z y 950MPa
Fy = 6kN F
0.36
FY
AS THE LIFE DECREASES TOWARDS 103 CYCLES YIELDING OCCURS AT THE NOTCH AND
THE EFFECTIVE KT DECREASES FOR DUCTILE MATERIALS.
u = 700MPa, Y = 540MPa
Sao (106) = 380MPa ROTATING BENDING
CALCULATE:
(i) Fa FOR ROD TO LAST AT LEAST 106 CYCLES
(ii) Fa FOR LIFE OF 103 CYCLES
(iii) Fa FOR LIFE OF 5 X 104 CYCLES
(iv) Fy FOR MONOTONIC LOADING
(v) FL FOR MONOTONIC LOADING
(vi) Fu FOR DUCTILE FRACTURE
CD = 1
= 108.2 m , q = 0.82
aREF = Fa
Fa
3183 Fa Pa
A x 0.012
Fa = 35.9 kN
CL = 0.85
CD = 1 = CS = Co
Kf = 1 (DUCTILE)
Fa (103) = 168.2 kN
a Nb
S ao
b
1 S ao
LOG
103
e 3 ao
S 10 e
1 536
LOG 0.224
6 3 114.2
1
S 10 3 e e 3
a ao
S 10e
ao
3
1
536 x 106 6 63
2.515 x 109 ( Pa )
114.2 x 106 3
Fa (5 x 104) = 70 kN
(iv) FY
ˆ Z K t
F
2.4 x
F
7639 F Pa
A x 0.012
FOR YIELD
ˆ Z y 540 M Pa
Fu
(vi) Fu u Fu 700 x 106 x x 0.012 220 kN
A
Fa (10 6 ) (
Fa 5 x 10 4 ) ( )
Fa 103 Fy FL
Fu Fu Fu Fu Fu
u = 330MPa
q = 0.9
CALCULATE:
CL = 0.85
CD = 1
CS = 0.7 FOR CRACK INITIATION AT HOLE
CO = 1
Kt = 3.13 ESDU 69020 Fig 2.3
q = 0.9
Kf = 1 + q (Kt - 1) = 1 + 0.9 (3.13 - 1) = 2.92
F
REF
A
F
2500 F ( Pa ) A = AREA OF UNDRILLED PLATE
50 x 8 x 106 (see ESDU 69020 Fig 2.3)
(ii) N = 103
CL = 0.85; CD = 1 = CS = CO
Kf = 1 (DUCTILE)
S’ao = a Nb
1 S ao
103
b
e 3
LOG
S 10e
ao
1 252
LOG 0.194
8 3 26.9
1
S 103 e
e 3
ao
a
S 10e 3
ao
1
252 x 10 6 8 83
965MPa
26.9 x106 3
( N ) 965 N 0.194
S ao ( MPa )
Fu
u
A
Fu = 330 x 106 x 40 x 8 x 10-6 = 105.6 kN
( )
Fa 108
= 0.1
Fu
Fa (10 6 )
= 0.25
Fu
1. UNNOTCHED SPECIMENS
S n
Sa 1 m
=
Sao u
WHEN Sm IS POSITIVE
FOR MOST STEELS n ~ 1.5
Sa ( N ) S
1 m (1)
S ao ( N ) u
(GOODMAN)
CALCULATE:
Sa S
1 m Sm = Sa
S ao u
S a 10 350 1
6 S a 106
700
aREF
M I
a y
x 83
x x 10 9
aREF 32
50.26 x 10 9 (1)
aREF ( Nm)
(ii) N = 103
Sao (103) = 0.9 x 700 = 630MPa
Sa (103)=Sao(103) 1 Sm
u
= 630
1 Sa 10
3
Sa (103)=332 MPa
700
PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 54
103 < N < 106
(a) USING Sa
Sa = a Nb
b
1
S a 103
e 3
Log
e
S a 10
1 332
Log 0.05126
3 233
1 1
S 10 3 e e 3 332 x 10 6 6 3
a a 473 MPa
[ S a 10 ]
e 3
233 x 106
3
Sa = 473 N-0.05126
259 MPa
N 1.27 x 105 cycles
MONOTONIC LOADING
S a K S
1 t m
S ao u
MONOTONIC LOADING
FATIGUE LOADING
S a S
1 m
S ao u
THICKNESS = 10
CS 0.75
CO 1
K t 1.87 ESDU 69020 Fig 5.8 S a (106 ) Sm
1
(10 )
S ao 6
u
1624 760 1624
Log u
586 586
85.5 m
1 1
q 0.872
85.8
1 1
r 4000
MEAN STRESS
375
S a (106 ) 119.7 1 60.6 MPa
760
a REF S a (106 )
93750 M a 60.6 x 106
M a 646 Nm
S
S 10
a a e
3 e
e 3
290.32
1391 MPa
S a (103 ) S ao
1
(103 ) 1 m
u
S a 10
3
60.6
375
573 1 S a 1391 N 0.2268 ( MPa )
760
290.3 MPa
FOR LIFE 105 CYCLES
5102 x 106
Ma (10 )
93750
= 1090 Nm
CALCULATION.
n Cycles applied at Sa , Sm
DAMAGE D =
N Cycles to produce failures at Sa , Sm
THE VALUE OF VARIES WITH CONDITIONS EG THE ORDER OF APPLICATION OF
IT IS COMMON TO USE = 1
ni
Ni
1
THICKNESS = 10
% OF LIFE 60 10 30
EG TORSION LOADING
VON MISES
TORSION FATIGUELIMIT,
ROTATINGBENDING FATIGUELIMIT, S a
MATERIAL
TORSION FATIGUELIMIT, A
ROTATINGBENDING FATIGUELIMIT,Sa
GENERAL COMPONENTS
5 IMPROVE ENVIRONMENT
6 REDUCE FRETTING
FOR 3 AND 4 CHANGES AT THE SURFACE ARE SUFFICIENT EXCEPT WHERE THE STRESS IS
UNIFORM
CYCLIC
e p
CYCLIC
STRESS
STRAIN
2 2 2
1/ n'
CURVES
FROM
STABLE 2 2E 2K '
HYSTERESIS
LOOPS
CYCLIC HARDENING
t
STRESS RESPONSE
t HYSTERESIS LOOPS
STRAIN CONTROL
CYCLIC SOFTENING
t
p
'f (2 N f )c --------------------------------------------------- (1)
2
BASQUIN’S EQUATION - BASED ON ELASTIC STRAIN RANGE
e f
'
(2 N f )b --------------------------------------------------- (2)
2 2E E
MORROW EQUATION - BASED ON SUPERPOSITION OF EQUATIONS (1) AND (2) COVERS
BOTH ELASTIC AND PLASTIC REGIMES
e p f
'
(2 N f )b 'f (2 N f )c ------------------------------- (3)
2 2 2 E
HALF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF REVERSALS AT THE TRANSITION FROM PLASTIC TO
ELASTIC FATIGUE IS GIVEN BY EQUATION (4) 1
' c b
1 f
Nt N f
------------------ (4)
2 E 'f
E – YOUNG’S MODULUS
e p
- ELASTIC STRAIN AMPLITUDE - PLASTIC STRAIN AMPLITUDE
2 2
'f - FATIGUE DUCTILITY COEFFICIENT WHICH IS THE STRAIN INTERCEPT AT ONE LOAD
REVERSAL i.e. 2Nf = 1
'f - FATIGUE STRENGTH COEFFICIENT WHICH IS THE STRESS INTERCEPT AT ONE LOAD
REVERSAL i.e. 2Nf = 1
2Nt - THE NUMBER OF REVERSALS AT THE TRANSITION FROM PLASTIC TO ELASTIC FATIGUE
BY USING MINER’S RULE TO INCLUDE THE EFFECT OF MEAN STRESS, MORROW’S EQUATION
(3) BECOMES
c
f
' b
1 m (2 N )b ' 1 m (2 N )c -------------------- (5)
2 E ' f f
' f
f f
ANOTHER FORM OF MORROW’S EQUATION (4) ABOVE WITH MODIFICATION ONLY TO THE
ELASTIC PART IS AS GIVEN IN EQUATION (6) BELOW
f
'
1 m (2 N )b ' (2 N )c
' f f f ---------------------------(6)
2 E
f
'f
max . f (2 N f )
' b
(2 N f ) f (2 N f )
b ' c
------------------- (7)
2 E
SWT APPEARS TO BE GOOD FOR A WIDE RANGE OF MATERIALS AND GOOD FOR
GENERAL USE
INFORMATION FOR FATIGUE REDUCTION FACTORS FOR STRAIN – LIFE METHOD IS RATHER
LIMITED COMPARED TO THE STRESS – LIFE APPROACH
FOR LIFE BELOW THE TRANSITION LIFE FROM PLASTIC TO ELASTIC FATIGUE DOMINATED
REGIMES NO FACTORS ARE REQUIRED EXCEPT UNDER SEVERE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS.
CS , CD AND CL CAN BE APPROXIMATED AS 1
NOTE Kf IS NOT REQUIRED BECAUSE STRAINS FROM THE LOCAL POINT ON A COMPONENT IS
USED DIRECTLY, I.E. THERE IS NO NEED TO CONSIDER REFRENCE STRESS AS IN THE STRESS –
LIFE APPROACH
BEYOND THE TRANSITION POINT APPLY FOLLOWING FACTORS TO THE ELASTIC PARTS
OF THE STRAIN – LIFE EQUATIONS
1 f
'
Ao
b log ; ln
' ln 100
6 0.5 UTS 100 % RA
f
Af
PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 78
ADDITIONAL APPROXIMATIONS IN THE STRAIN – LIFE APPROACH
n' 1
b ; c
1 5n ' 1 5n '
NO WIDE ACCEPTANCE YET
MORROW JD. CYCLIC PLASTIC STRAIN ENERGY AND FATIGUE OF METALS. INTERNAL FRICTION,
DAMPING, AND CYCLIC PLASTICITY—ASTM STP 378. AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND
MATERIALS, PHILADELPHIA, PA, 1964:45-87.
n' 1
b ; c
1 5n ' 1 5n '
NO WIDE ACCEPTANCE YET
MORROW JD. CYCLIC PLASTIC STRAIN ENERGY AND FATIGUE OF METALS. INTERNAL FRICTION,
DAMPING, AND CYCLIC PLASTICITY—ASTM STP 378. AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND
MATERIALS, PHILADELPHIA, PA, 1964:45-87.
Ultimate Tensile Strength, UTS, (MPa) Ultimate Tensile Strength, UTS, (MPa)
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FATIGUE STRENGTH AND ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH APPLIES
FOR A WIDE RANGE OF LOW AND MEDIUM STRENGTH VERSIONS OF MATERIALS ( R W Hertzberg).