Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 81

ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS (P04710)

FATIGUE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TH9k9fWaFrs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVw5g1s06ow

http://vimeo.com/24925550

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 1


FATIGUE FAILURES ARE CAUSED BY
FLUCTUATING LOADS SLIP INTRUSION AND EXTRUSION

FAILURE OCCURS IN 4 STEPS

1. LOCAL MICROSCOPIC DAMAGE INITIATE.

DAMAGE OCCURS AT POINTS OF HIGH STRESS:

i. SURFACE NOTCHES – FILLETS, GROOVES, SCRATCHES, WELDS

ii. DEFECTS WITHIN THE MATERIAL

SEVERAL DAMAGE SITES MAY DEVELOP SIMULTANEOUSLY.

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 2


2 MICROCRACKING (STAGE 1 CRACKING)
3 MACROCRACKING (STAGE 2 CRACKING)
MICROCRACKS (< 100M) GROW ON PLANES
OF MAXIMUM SHEAR AT THE DAMAGE MACROCRACKS, EXTENDING ACROSS MANY
SITES GRAINS, DEVELOP WITH AN ORIENTATION
NORMAL TO THE MAXIMUM PRINCIPAL STRESS.

ONE CRACK WILL DOMINATE AND GROW

4 FAST FRACTURE OCCURS


FINAL FRACTURE MAY BE EITHER BRITTLE OR
DUCTILE, BUT IS OFTEN BRITTLE IN STRONGER
MATERIALS.

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 3


BLUNT CRACKS ESTABLISHED BY WELDING AND OTHER MANUFACTURING
PROCESSES ARE CHANGED DIRECTLY INTO SHARP MACROCRACKS.

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 4


BEHAVIOUR OF MATERIAL SPECIMENS

1 TYPE OF TEST TYPICAL STRESS-TIME RELATIONS


PUSH-PULL

F
s  Z 
A
PLANE BENDING

M
s  Z  yˆ
I
ROTATING BENDING

STRESS RANGE  2S a

M S
s  Z  yˆ STRESS RATIO  R 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52knsY5AWIc
I Ŝ
PART II FATIGUE 5
2 STRESS – LIFE RELATIONSHIPS

a) b)

a) LINEAR – LINEAR

b) LOG – LINEAR
c)
c) LOG - LOG

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 6


MATERIALS HAVING A FATIGUE LIMIT

FATIGUE LIMIT HAS A STRONG


FATIGUE LIMIT
RELATIONSHIP TO THE ULTIMATE
TENSILE STRENGTH (EXCEPT WHERE u
IS HIGH)

STEEL Sao (106) = 0.4 u - 0.6u


TITANIUM Sao (107)  0.5 u
CAST IRON Sao (107)  0.4 u

OTHER MATERIALS

EXAMPLES FOR ROTATING BENDING

ALUMINIUM (WROUGHT) Sao (108) = 0.35 – 0.4 u


MAGNESIUM (WROUGHT) Sao (108)  0.35 u

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 7


Fatigue Strength, (MPa)

Ultimate Tensile Strength, UTS, (MPa) Ultimate Tensile Strength, UTS, (MPa)

STEEL WROUGHT COPPER ALLOYS

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FATIGUE STRENGTH AND ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH APPLIES
FOR A WIDE RANGE OF LOW AND MEDIUM STRENGTH VERSIONS OF MATERIALS ( R W Hertzberg).

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 8


FATIGUE STRENGTH (MPa)
FATIGUE LIMIT (MPa)

STEEL ALUMINIUM

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FATIGUE STRENGTH AND ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH APPLIES
FOR A WIDE RANGE OF LOW AND MEDIUM STRENGTH VERSIONS OF MATERIALS. WHERE THE
MONOTONIC STRENGTH IS HIGH THE FATIGUE LIMIT IS A LOWER % OF u.

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 9


TYPICAL S-N CURVES FOR STEEL AND ALUMINIUM

u < 1400 MPa


STEEL
LOADING: ROTATING BENDING

ALUMINIUM u < 330 MPa

LOADING: ROTATING BENDING

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 10


EQUATIONS FOR S-N CURVES

Sa = a N b

Log Sa = b Log N + Log a

b = SLOPE =
 
Log S a 10e - Log S a 103  
Log 10e  Log 103


1
Log 
 
 S a 103
e - 3  
 S a 10
e

  
  Log 10e  Log 10o 
    
Log a  Log S a 10e   LogSa 103  Log S a 10e    
  Log 10e  Log 103 
  
 e 
 Log S 10e      Log S 103   Log S 10e  
a   e 3  a  a 

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 11


     
 e   e 
 
Log a  Log S a 10  Log S a 10
e 3  e - 3 
   Log S a 10 e  
 e -3 

 1 

   
 
 3   S 10 3 e  e  3

     
 e   
3  e 3   e 3   Log  a
 Log S a 10  Log S a 10
   
e
  3
 S a 10e
 1 
 

   
 e  3

 S 103 e

a  a
 a    
 S 10e 3

e.g. STEEL, STANDARD CURVE

 
S a 103  0.9 u   S a 106  0.5 u
1  S 10   3
1  0.9 
 Log     Log  
 S 10  
a u
b
e  3 a6  3
e
 0.5 u 

  0.085
 1 

  
   1 
 0.9 u  
 
 S 10 3 e
  e 3  6  6 3 
 a    
  
a 3 
 S 10e  0.5 u  
3 
 a 
 1.62 u Sa = 1.62u N-0.085

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 12


ALUMINIUM, STANDARD CURVE

Sa (103) = 0.9u Sa (108) = 0.4u

1  0.9 u 
b Log     0.0704
8  3  0.4 u 
 1 
 0.9  u 8   8 3 
 

a     1.464 u
 0.4 u 3 

Sa = 1.464uN-0.0704

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 13


BEHAVIOUR OF COMPONENTS

FOR N ≥ 103 CYCLES OF ALTERNATING

CONSTANT AMPLITUDE LOAD

C L C D C S CO
  Sao
Sao
Kf

S'ao FATIGUE STRENGTH OF COMPONENT } At N


Sao FATIGUE STRENGTH OF SPECIMEN }
CL LOADING FACTOR
CD DIMENSION (SIZE) FACTOR
CS SURFACE FINISH FACTOR
Kf NOTCH FACTOR
Co OTHER E.G. SURFACE TREATMENTS ENVIRONMENT

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 14


Life /
Factor 103 cycles 106 or 108 cycles

CL Bending  Bending CL = 1.00 Bending  Bending CL = 1.00


Bending  Axial CL = 0.85 Bending  Axial CL = 0.85
Axial  Bending CL = 1.00 Axial  Bending CL = 1.00
Axial  Axial CL = 1.00 Axial  Axial CL = 1.00

CD CD = 1 Bending  CD = 1 for d < 8 mm


Bending  CD = 0.61d-0.097 for 8 < d < 200 mm
Axial  CD = 1 for d < 50 mm
CS CS = 1 Find CS from charts or data tables

For steel use graph of CS  u


(or graphs in ESDU 74027 based on Kt)
Co CO = 1 CO = 1
Unless data shows otherwise Unless data shows otherwise

Kf Kf = 1 (for ductile material) Kf = Kf


Kf = Kt (for brittle material)

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 15


SURFACE FINISH FACTORS – STEEL SPECIMENS AT N = 106

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 16


CO
(i) SURFACE TREATMENTS GIVING CO < 1
SEVERE GRINDING (TENSILE RESIDUAL STRESS) 0.9 – 0.75
COATINGS (METAL AND CERAMIC) 1 – 0.3
THE EFFECTS ARE GREATEST ON STRONG SUBSTRATES
DECARBURIZATION 0.6 – 0.3
FRETTING 0.6 – 0.3
WEAR
CORROSION 0.8 – 0.1
WELDING (COATINGS AND JOINING) 0.7 – 0.2

(ii) SURFACE TREATMENTS GIVING CO > 1(1)


GENTLE GRINDING (COMPRESSIVE RESIDUAL STRESS) 1.1
PEENING(2) - SHOT 1.3 – 2
GLASS BEAD
ROLLING (2) - GENERAL 1.3 – 2
- THREADS 1.3 –
SURFACE HARDENING(3) 1.3 – 2.5

(1) Ĉo  1.1 FOR UNIFORM TENSION BARS (NO INTERNAL DEFECTS)
(2) COMPRESSIVE RESIDUAL STRESSES IN SURFACE
(3) COMPRESSIVE RESIDUAL STRESS AND HIGHER u IN THE CASE. SUBSTRATE IS UNCHANGED.

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 17


OTHERS FACTORS FOR SURFACE TREATMENTS – STEEL SPECIMENS AT N = 106

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 18


MATERIAL: STEEL, u = 1100 MPa

DETERMINE:
SHAFT DIAMETER SO THAT IT WILL SURVIVE 106 CYCLES
S – N EQUATION
LIFE IF F = 8kN
u OF THE STEEL FOR LIFE OF 2.5 X 105 CYCLES WHEN F = 8kN.

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 19


1. USING STANDARD S-N CURVE FOR ROTATING BENDING SPECIMENS

Sao (106) = 0.5 x 1100


= 550 MPa

S'ao (106) = Sao (106) CL CD CS CO


CL = 1
CD = 0.61 d-0.097 (ASSUMING THAT 8 < d < 200mm )

CS = 0.9 (FROM GRAPH)


CO = 1 (IGNORING WEAR IN THE BEARING)
CD = 0.61 d-0.097 (ASSUMING THAT 8 < d < 200mm )
S'ao(106) = 550 x 106 x 1 x (0.61 d-0.097 ) x 0.9 = 302 x 106 x d-0.097 Pa

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 20


SHAFT LOADING

AT SUPPORT

M 1200 x 64 d 12223
REF = ŷ = x = (Pa )
4
I πd 2 d3

FOR N = 106  (106 )


 REF  S ao

12223
3
 302 106  d 0.097
d

d 2.903  12223 / (302 106 )



d  31mm
PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 21
2.
2.
S'ao(106) = Sao(106) CLCDCsCo / Kf S’ao(103) = Sao(103) CL
CD = 0.61 x d-0.097 = 0.61 x (31 x 10-3)-0.097 = 0.85 = 0.9 u x 1
CS = 0.9; = 0.9 u

Co = CL = Kf = 1
S'ao(106) = (0.5x u)x 1 x 0.85 x 0.9 x 1 / 1

= 0.382u

S'ao = a Nb


1  S ao
LOG 
 103  
b
e  3  10e
 S ao   
1  0.9  u 
 LOG     0.124
6  3  0.382 u 
 1 

   
 
 S  10 3 e  e 3 
  ao S’ao = 2.12 uN-0.124
   
a )
 S  10e 3
 ao ) --------(1)


0.9 u 
2
 2.12 u
= 2332 N-0.124 (MPa) )
0.382 u

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 22


3


REF = ŷ
I

1600 x 64 0.031
 x  547 MPa
 x 0.0314 2

FOR FAILURE IN N CYCLES


REF = S'ao (N)
Using (1)
547 = 2332 N-0.124
N = 1.2 x 105 cycles

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 23


4. FOR A SIMILAR STEEL WITH HIGHER U, OR THE SAME STEEL WITH HIGHER
HARDNESS, THE S-N CURVE IS PARALLEL TO THE ORIGINAL CURVE.
USING (1) FOR FAILURE IN 2.5 x 105 CYCLES
REF = S'ao (2.5 x 105)
547 = 2.12 u (2.5 x 105)-0.124
u = 1205 MPa

A 10% INCREASE IN u DOUBLES THE LIFE

+ 5% VARIATION IN U CAN BE EXPECTED, GIVING 2:1 VARIATION IN LIFE

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 24


Kf FOR NOTCHED COMPONENTS

Kf 
FATIGUESTRENGTH OF UNNOTCHEDBAR

 
Fao 106 (1)

S 'ao 106 (1)  
FATIGUESTRENGTH OF NOTCHED BAR  
Fao 106 (2) S ' ao 106 (2)  
Kf IS USUALLY IN THE RANGE 0.7 Kt - 0.95 Kt

AND CAN BE CALCULATED FROM Kf = 1 + q (Kt – 1)

1
q = NOTCH SENSITIVITY FACTOR FOR THE MATERIAL q
  
1 
 r 

r = NOTCH RADIUS
  u  1624 x 106 
 - FROM GRAPH OF Log     6
 [ Dowling p 407]
 586 x 10 

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 25


NOTCH SENSITIVITY
CONSTANT - NEUBER

ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH (MPa)

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 26


e.g.

MATERIAL: (1) STEEL, u = 500MPa


(2) STEEL, u = 1200MPa
CALCULATE Kf

Kt
Kt = 2.99 ESDU 69020 Fig. 5.4

  u  1624 x 106 
Log     6

 586 x 10 

(1)  = 237.4m GRAPH 203m


(2)  = 15.17m GRAPH 16.9m

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 27


q 1
q =
 
1  
 r 

(1) q = 0.744 OR 0.758


(2) q = 0.920 0.916
Kf
Kf = 1 + q (Kt - 1)
(1) Kf = 2.48 OR 2.51
(2) Kf = 2.83 2.82

Kf (2) = 1.12 Kf (1)

Kf (1) = 0.83 Kt Kf (2) = 0.95 Kt

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 28


SHOULDER: Kt = 2.1

MATERIAL: STEEL u = 1100 MPa, y = 950MPa,

Sao(106) = 550MPa ROTATING BENDING

CALCULATE:

F FOR SHAFT TO LAST FOR AT LEAST 106 REVOLUTIONS

FY FOR MONOTONIC LOADING,  = 0 REV/ MIN.

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 29


FATIGUE STRENGTH
C L C D CS
S’ao(106) = Sao(106) Kf

CL = 1 SAME TYPE OF LOADING AS SPECIMEN


CD = 0.61 d-0.097 = 0.61 x 0.03-0.097 = 0.86
CS = 0.69 FROM GRAPH
Kt = 2.1
Kf = 1 + q (Kt - 1)

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 30


  u  1624 x 106 
LOG     6

 586 x 10 

 1100  1624 
 
 586 

 = 22.5m

1
q  0.9
 22.5 x 10 6 
1  
 2 x 10 3 
 
 K f  
   0 .95 
Kf = 1 + 0.9 (2.1 - 1) = 1.99  K 
 t  

  S ao 106 
C L C D CS
S ao
Kf

1 x 0.86 x 0.69
 
 106
S ao
0.15
 550 x  164MPa u
1.99

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 31


FOR THE SHAFT TO LAST 106 CYCLES OR MORE

aREF < S1 ao (106) = 164 MPa


M
aREF = yˆ
I

200 x 103 F x 32
  75.5 x 103 F ( Pa )
 x 0.033

 75.5 x 103 F = 164 x 106


F = 2.17kN

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 32


2.

M 2.1 x 0.2 F x 32
ˆ Z  Kt yˆ   158.4 x 103 F ( Pa )
I  x 0.03 3

For yield

ˆ Z  y  950MPa

158.4 x 103 Fy = 950 x 106

Fy = 6kN F
 0.36
FY

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 33


Kf AT N < 106 STEEL OR < 108 ALUMINIUM

AS THE LIFE DECREASES TOWARDS 103 CYCLES YIELDING OCCURS AT THE NOTCH AND
THE EFFECTIVE KT DECREASES FOR DUCTILE MATERIALS.

AT N = 103 USE Kf = 1 DUCTILE MATERIALS


Kf = Kt BRITTLE MATERIALS

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 34


103 < N < 106

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 35


MATERIAL: STEEL

u = 700MPa, Y = 540MPa
Sao (106) = 380MPa ROTATING BENDING

CALCULATE:
(i) Fa FOR ROD TO LAST AT LEAST 106 CYCLES
(ii) Fa FOR LIFE OF 103 CYCLES
(iii) Fa FOR LIFE OF 5 X 104 CYCLES
(iv) Fy FOR MONOTONIC LOADING
(v) FL FOR MONOTONIC LOADING
(vi) Fu FOR DUCTILE FRACTURE

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 36


S’ao(106) = Sao (106) C L C D CS
Kf

CL = 0.85 USING BENDING Sao

CD = 1

CS = 0.76 FROM GRAPH

 = 108.2 m , q = 0.82

Kf = 1 + q (Kt - 1) = 1 + 0.82 (2.4 - 1) = 2.15

S’ao (106) = 380 x 0.85 x 1 x 0.76  114.2MP


a
2.15

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 37


FOR THE ROD TO LAST 106 CYCLES

aREF = S’ao (106) = 114.2 MPa

aREF = Fa

Fa
 3183 Fa Pa 
A  x 0.012

3183 Fa = 114.2 x 106

Fa = 35.9 kN

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 38


(ii) N = 103

CL = 0.85

CD = 1 = CS = Co

Kf = 1 (DUCTILE)

S’ao(103) = Sao (103) CL = 0.9 CL

= 0.9 x 700 x 0.85 = 536 MPa

FOR THE ROD TO LAST 103 CYCLES

aREF = S’ao (103) = 536 MPa

3183 Fa = 537 x 106

Fa (103) = 168.2 kN

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 39


(iii) 103 < N < 106

  a Nb
S ao

b
1  S ao
LOG 
 103 

 
e  3  ao
S  10 e 
  
1  536 
 LOG     0.224
6  3  114.2 

 1 

   
 
 S  10 3 e  e 3 
a   ao
   
 S  10e
 ao
3

 1 

 
 
 536 x 106 6  63 
   2.515 x 109 ( Pa )

 114.2 x 106 3 
  

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 40


S’ao (N) = 2.515 x 109 N-0.224 (Pa)

FOR LIFE OF 5 x 104 CYCLES

S’ao (105) = 2.515 x 109 x (5 x 104) - 0.2224 = 223 MPa

aREF  S’as (5 x 104)

3183Fa = 223 x 106

Fa (5 x 104) = 70 kN

(iv) FY

ˆ Z  K t
F
 2.4 x
F
 7639 F Pa 
A  x 0.012

FOR YIELD

ˆ Z   y  540 M Pa

7639 Fy  540 x 106


Fy  70.7 kN

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 41


FL
(v) FL y  FL  540 x 106 x  x 0.012  170 kN
A

Fu
(vi) Fu u  Fu  700 x 106 x  x 0.012  220 kN
A

Fa (10 6 ) (
Fa 5 x 10 4 ) ( )
Fa 103 Fy FL
Fu Fu Fu Fu Fu

0.163 0.318 0.765 0.321 0.772

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 42


MATERIAL: ALUMINIUM

u = 330MPa

Cs = 0.8 UNMACHINED SURFACE

= 0.7 MACHINED SURFACE

q = 0.9

CALCULATE:

(i) Fa FOR 108 CYCLES TO FAILURE

(ii) Fa FOR 106 CYCLES TO FAILURE

(iii) Fu FOR DUCTILE FRACTURE

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 43


C C C C
(i) S’ao (108) = Sao (108) L D S O
Kf

Sao (108) = 0.4 σ u STANDARD CURVE FOR ROTATING BENDING

CL = 0.85

CD = 1
CS = 0.7 FOR CRACK INITIATION AT HOLE
CO = 1
Kt = 3.13 ESDU 69020 Fig 2.3
q = 0.9
Kf = 1 + q (Kt - 1) = 1 + 0.9 (3.13 - 1) = 2.92

0.4 x 330 x 0.85 x 1 x 0.7 x 1


S’ao (108) =  26.9MPa
2.92    0.08
 108
S ao
u

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 44


LOADING

F
 REF 
A
F
  2500 F ( Pa ) A = AREA OF UNDRILLED PLATE
50 x 8 x 106 (see ESDU 69020 Fig 2.3)

FOR A LIFE OF 108 cycles

aREF  S’ao(108) = 26.9 MPa 2500 Fa = 26.9 x 106 Fa (108) = 10.8kN

(ii) N = 103

CL = 0.85; CD = 1 = CS = CO
Kf = 1 (DUCTILE)

Sao (103) = 0.9u = 0.9 x 330 = 297 MPa

S’ao (103) = Sao (103) CL; = 297 x 0.85 = 252 MPa

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 45


103 < N < 108

S’ao = a Nb

 
1  S ao

 103   
b
e  3
LOG
 S  10e
 ao   
1  252 
  LOG    0.194
8  3  26.9 
 1 

  
 
 S  103 e
  e 3 
  ao 
  
a
 S  10e 3 
 ao 
 1 

 
 
 252 x 10  6 8  83 
    965MPa

 26.9 x106 3 
  
 ( N )  965 N 0.194
S ao ( MPa )

FOR LIFE OF 106 cycles

S’ao (106) = 965 x (106)-0.194 = 66.1 MPa

aREF  S’ao (106)

2500 Fa = 66.1 x 106; Fa (106) = 26.4 kN

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 46


(iii) ULTIMATE MONOTONIC LOAD

Fu
u 
A
Fu = 330 x 106 x 40 x 8 x 10-6 = 105.6 kN

( )
Fa 108
= 0.1
Fu

Fa (10 6 )
= 0.25
Fu

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 47


PARTS WITH NON ZERO MEAN STRESS

SUBJECTED TO CYCLIC LOADING

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 48


EFFECT OF MEAN STRESS

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 49


EFFECT OF MEAN STRESS

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 50


EFFECT OF MEAN STRESS

1. UNNOTCHED SPECIMENS

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 51


THE CURVE FOR N = CONSTANT CAN BE APPROXIMATED BY:

  S n 
Sa 1   m  
=     
Sao   u 

WHEN Sm IS POSITIVE
FOR MOST STEELS n ~ 1.5

FOR ALUMINIUM AND THE STRONGER STEELS


n 1

n = 1 IS USED FOR MOST WROUGHT METALS

Sa ( N )  S 
 1  m       (1)
S ao ( N )  u 

(GOODMAN)

USE (1) FOR 103 < N < 106 STEEL


EFFECT OF Sm ON N
103 <N< 108 ALUMINIUM

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 52


EXAMPLE

MATERIAL: STEEL, u = 700 MPa

CALCULATE:

(i) M̂ FOR LIFE OF 106 CYLCES

(ii) LIFE WHEN M̂ = 26 Nm

i) Sao (106) = 0.5 x 700 = 350 MPa

Sa  S 
 1  m  Sm = Sa
S ao   u 

  
S a 10  350 1 
6 S a 106  

 700 

Sa (106) = 233 MPa

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 53


LOADING

 aREF
M  I
a y

 x 83
 x x 10 9
aREF 32
 50.26 x 10 9  (1)
aREF ( Nm)

FOR A LIFE OF 106 CYCLES

aREF  Sa (106) = 233 MPa

Ma = 50.26 x 10-9 x 233 x 106 = 11.7 Nm; M̂ = 23.4 Nm

(ii) N = 103
Sao (103) = 0.9 x 700 = 630MPa
Sa (103)=Sao(103) 1  Sm 
  u 

= 630

1  Sa 10  
3 
Sa (103)=332 MPa
 700 

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 54
103 < N < 106

(a) USING Sa

Sa = a Nb

b
1

 
 S a 103 

e  3
Log
 
e 
 S a 10 
1  332 
 Log     0.05126
3  233 
 1  1

     
 
 S 10  3 e  e  3  332 x 10 6 6 3
a  a    473 MPa
  
 [ S a 10 ] 
e 3
  
 233 x 106  
3

Sa = 473 N-0.05126

FOR LOADING OF Ma = 13 Nm FOR LIFE OF N CYCLES

aREF Ma from(1) aREF  Sa ( N)



50.26 x 10 9
259  473 N 0.05126

 259 MPa
N  1.27 x 105 cycles

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 55


2. NOTCHED COMPONENTS
BRITTLE AND DUCTILE MATERIALS BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY

2.1 BRITTLE MATERIALS IN TENSION


FATIGUE LOADING

MONOTONIC LOADING

S a  K S 
 1  t m 

S ao  u 

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 56


2.2 DUCTILE MATERIALS IN TENSION

MONOTONIC LOADING

FATIGUE LOADING

S a  S 
 1  m 
 
S ao u 

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 57


EXAMPLE

THICKNESS = 10

MATERIAL: STEEL ,  u  760 MPa


FATIGUE LOADING OF TENSION / COMP. SPECIMENS

Sao (103 )  573 MPa , Sao (106 )  360 MPa

CALCULATE LOAD AMPLITUDE FOR:

(i) LIFE OF 106 CYCLES

(ii) LIFE OF 105 CYCLES

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 58


(i)
CL CD CS CO
 (106 )  S ao (106 )
S ao
Kf K f  1  0.872 (1.87  1)  1.76
Sao (106 )
1 x 0.78 x 0.75 x 1
CL  1  (106 )  360 x
S ao
1.76
CD  0.61 d 0.097  0.61 x 0.080.097  0.78  119.7 MPa

USING DEPTH IN DIRECTION OF CRACK GROWTH

CS  0.75
CO  1
K t  1.87 ESDU 69020 Fig 5.8 S a (106 )  Sm 
 
1  
 (10 ) 
S ao 6
u 
   1624  760  1624
Log     u 
 586  586
  85.5 m
1 1
q   0.872
   85.8 
1   1  
 r   4000 
 

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 59


LOADING
M
REF  ŷ
I
Mx6
 2
 93750 M        (1)
0.01 x 0.08

MEAN STRESS

S m   REF  93750 x 4000


 375 MPa                  (2)

 375 
S a (106 )  119.7 1    60.6 MPa
 760 

FOR LIFE CYCLES OF 106 CYCLES

 a REF  S a (106 )
93750 M a  60.6 x 106
M a  646 Nm

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 60


(ii) (a) USING Sa – N
103 < N < 106
N  103
CL  1 C D  C S  CO S a  a N b
K f  1 (DUCTILE)
b
1  S 103 
LOG  a 
 
e 
e  3  a
S (10 ) 
 (103 )  S ao (103 )  573 MPa
S ao 1  290.3 
  LOG     0.2268
S m  375 MPa (FROM (2)) 3  60.6 
 1 

 S 
  
 S  10
a   a e
3 e


 
 e  3

290.32
 1391 MPa
S a (103 )  S ao
1
(103 ) 1  m 
u 
  
 S a 10
3 
 60.6

 375 
 573 1   S a  1391 N 0.2268 ( MPa )
 760 
 290.3 MPa
FOR LIFE 105 CYCLES

Sa 102 MPa

 a REF  Sa (105 )  102 MPa

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 61


FROM (1)

5102 x 106
Ma (10 ) 
93750

= 1090 Nm

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 62


VARIABLE AMPLITUDE LOADING

WHEN THE LOADING CAN BE

SUMMARISED BY DISCRETE SETS OF

STRESS LEVELS, LIFE CAN BE ESTIMATED

USING A SIMPLE CUMULATIVE DAMAGE

CALCULATION.

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 63


MINER’S LAW

FAILURE OCCURS WHEN  Di  


WHERE

n Cycles applied at Sa , Sm
DAMAGE D = 
N Cycles to produce failures at Sa , Sm
THE VALUE OF  VARIES WITH CONDITIONS EG THE ORDER OF APPLICATION OF

THE LOADING CYCLES.

RANDOM LOADING GIVES 0.6 <  < 1.6

IT IS COMMON TO USE  = 1

ni
 Ni
1

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 64


EXAMPLE

THICKNESS = 10

MATERIAL: STEEL ,  u  760 MPa


FATIGUE LOADING OF TENSION / COMP. SPECIMENS

Sao (103 )  573 MPa , Sao (106 )  360 MPa

LOADING, VARYING CONTINUOUSLY

Ma (Nm) 646 3097 1088

% OF LIFE 60 10 30

CALCULATE THE LIFE

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 65


FROM PREVIOUS ANALYSIS
n
 Ni 1
i

0.6 N 0.1 N 0.3 N


  1
106 103 105

0.6 x 106  100 x 106  3 x 106  N  1


N  9652 cycles

60.6 290.3 102


Sa ( MPa )

ni ACTUAL CYCLES APPLIED 0.6 N 0.1 N 0.3 N

Ni FOR FAILURE AT CONSTANT 106 103 105


AMPLITUDE (CYCLES)

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 66


TWO AND THREE DIMENSIONAL STATES OF STRESS

FOR DUCTILE MATERIALS FAILING AT A FREE SURFACE USE VON MISES

OR TRESCA EQUIVALENT UNIAXIAL STRESSES IN THE USUAL FATIGUE CALCULATIONS.

EG TORSION LOADING

VON MISES

1  2 2  2  3 2  3  1 2  2 2


  3 z
TRESCA

ˆ    
 z    z  
  2 z
FOR CAST MATERIALS CONTAINING INCLUSIONS USE THE MAXIMUM PRINCIPAL STRESS.

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 67


RESULTS FROM TORSION FATIGUE TESTS

TORSION FATIGUELIMIT, 
ROTATINGBENDING FATIGUELIMIT, S a

MATERIAL
TORSION FATIGUELIMIT, A
ROTATINGBENDING FATIGUELIMIT,Sa

VON MISES TRESCA ̂


PLAIN CARBON STEEL 0.55 0.95 1.10

ALLOY STEELS 0.58 1.00 1.16

NON-FERROUS ALLOYS 0.52 0.9 1.04


(N = 108) 0.60 1.04 1.20

CAST IRONS 0.9 0.9


1.0 1.0

GENERAL COMPONENTS

PREDICTIONS ARE NOT AS GOOD AS THE PREDICTIONS FOR TORSION.

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 68


IMPROVING FATIGUE STRENGTH

1 IMPROVE SHAPE IE REDUCE Kf

2 IMPROVE SURFACE FINISH

3 INCREASE MATERIAL STRENGTH EG HARDEN, CHANGE MATERIAL

4 INDUCE COMPRESSIVE RESIDUAL STRESS


EG PEENING,
SURFACE HARDENING,
PRE-LOADING BEYOND YIELD

5 IMPROVE ENVIRONMENT

6 REDUCE FRETTING

FOR 3 AND 4 CHANGES AT THE SURFACE ARE SUFFICIENT EXCEPT WHERE THE STRESS IS
UNIFORM

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 69


STRAIN – LIFE FATIGUE ANALYSIS

APPROACH IS USED PRIMARILY FOR HIGHER ACCURACY OF FATIGUE LIFE


PREDICTION AT HIGH LOADING - LOW CYCLE COUNT SITUATIONS

THE METHOD IS NEVERTHELESS USED ACROSS LOW AND HIGH CYCLE


FATIGUE LIFE PREDICTION

STRAIN – LIFE FATIGUE EQUATIONS ARE BASED ON PARAMETERS


DETERMINED FROM THE STABILISED CYCLIC STRESS STRAIN CURVES OF
MATERIALS MONOTONIC
RELATIONSHIP
CYCLIC STRESS STRAIN CURVES ARE EXPRESSED IN RAMBERG OSGOOD
EQUATION FORM WHERE K’ IS THE CYCLIC STRENGTH COEFFICIENT AND 1 / n'
  
n’ IS THE STRAIN HARDENING COEFFICIENT     
E  K' 

CYCLIC
  e  p
CYCLIC
STRESS
 
STRAIN
2 2 2
1/ n'
CURVES
    
FROM   
STABLE 2 2E  2K ' 
HYSTERESIS
LOOPS

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 70


STRAIN – LIFE FATIGUE ANALYSIS
 

CYCLIC HARDENING
t

STRESS RESPONSE
t HYSTERESIS LOOPS

STRAIN CONTROL 

CYCLIC SOFTENING
t

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 71


STRAIN – LIFE RELATIONS

COFFIN – MASON’S EQUATION - BASED ON PLASTIC STRAIN RANGE

 p
  'f (2 N f )c --------------------------------------------------- (1)
2
BASQUIN’S EQUATION - BASED ON ELASTIC STRAIN RANGE

 e   f
'

  (2 N f )b --------------------------------------------------- (2)
2 2E E
MORROW EQUATION - BASED ON SUPERPOSITION OF EQUATIONS (1) AND (2) COVERS
BOTH ELASTIC AND PLASTIC REGIMES

  e  p  f
'
   (2 N f )b   'f (2 N f )c ------------------------------- (3)
2 2 2 E
HALF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF REVERSALS AT THE TRANSITION FROM PLASTIC TO
ELASTIC FATIGUE IS GIVEN BY EQUATION (4) 1
 '  c b
1  f 
Nt  N f   
------------------ (4)
2  E 'f
 

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 72


TERMS IN THE EQUATIONS

E – YOUNG’S MODULUS

 e  p
- ELASTIC STRAIN AMPLITUDE - PLASTIC STRAIN AMPLITUDE
2 2
 'f - FATIGUE DUCTILITY COEFFICIENT WHICH IS THE STRAIN INTERCEPT AT ONE LOAD
REVERSAL i.e. 2Nf = 1

2Nf - TOTAL STRAIN REVERSALS TO FAILURE

c - FATIGUE DUCTILITY EXPONENT WHICH IS A MATERIAL PROPERTY THAT RANGES


BETWEEN -0.5 AND -0.7

 'f - FATIGUE STRENGTH COEFFICIENT WHICH IS THE STRESS INTERCEPT AT ONE LOAD
REVERSAL i.e. 2Nf = 1

b - FATIGUE STRENGTH EXPONENT IS A MATERIAL PROPERTY

2Nt - THE NUMBER OF REVERSALS AT THE TRANSITION FROM PLASTIC TO ELASTIC FATIGUE

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 73


OVERALL STRAIN –LIFE CURVE

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 74


DETERMINATION OF FATIGUE DUCTILITY COEFFICIENT

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 75


DETERMINATION OF FATIGUE STRENGTHCOEFFICIENT

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 76


EFFECT OF MEAN STRESS IN STRAIN – LIFE FATIGUE PREDICTION

BY USING MINER’S RULE TO INCLUDE THE EFFECT OF MEAN STRESS, MORROW’S EQUATION
(3) BECOMES
c
  f
'     b
 1  m (2 N )b   ' 1   m  (2 N )c -------------------- (5)
2 E  '  f f
 '  f
 f   f 

ANOTHER FORM OF MORROW’S EQUATION (4) ABOVE WITH MODIFICATION ONLY TO THE
ELASTIC PART IS AS GIVEN IN EQUATION (6) BELOW

  f
'   
 1  m (2 N )b   ' (2 N )c
 '  f f f ---------------------------(6)
2 E
 f 

SMITH, WATSON AND TOPPER (SWT) RELATIONSHIP IS WRITTEN AS

  'f 
 max .   f (2 N f ) 
' b
(2 N f )   f (2 N f ) 
b ' c
------------------- (7)
2  E 

SWT APPEARS TO BE GOOD FOR A WIDE RANGE OF MATERIALS AND GOOD FOR
GENERAL USE

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 77


FATIGUE REDUCTION FACTORS OTHER APPROXIMATIONS IN THE STRAIN – LIFE APPROACH

INFORMATION FOR FATIGUE REDUCTION FACTORS FOR STRAIN – LIFE METHOD IS RATHER
LIMITED COMPARED TO THE STRESS – LIFE APPROACH

FOR LIFE BELOW THE TRANSITION LIFE FROM PLASTIC TO ELASTIC FATIGUE DOMINATED
REGIMES NO FACTORS ARE REQUIRED EXCEPT UNDER SEVERE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS.
CS , CD AND CL CAN BE APPROXIMATED AS 1

NOTE Kf IS NOT REQUIRED BECAUSE STRAINS FROM THE LOCAL POINT ON A COMPONENT IS
USED DIRECTLY, I.E. THERE IS NO NEED TO CONSIDER REFRENCE STRESS AS IN THE STRESS –
LIFE APPROACH

BEYOND THE TRANSITION POINT APPLY FOLLOWING FACTORS TO THE ELASTIC PARTS
OF THE STRAIN – LIFE EQUATIONS

CD = 0.71 d - 0.093 FOR 8 < d < 250 MM FOR BENDING PROBLEMS

 'f  UTS  345 (MPa );  'f  strain at fracture (tensile test)

1   f
'
  Ao 
b   log ;   ln
'   ln 100 

6  0.5   UTS    100  % RA 
f
  Af 
PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 78
ADDITIONAL APPROXIMATIONS IN THE STRAIN – LIFE APPROACH

n' 1
b ; c
1  5n ' 1  5n '
NO WIDE ACCEPTANCE YET

MORROW JD. CYCLIC PLASTIC STRAIN ENERGY AND FATIGUE OF METALS. INTERNAL FRICTION,
DAMPING, AND CYCLIC PLASTICITY—ASTM STP 378. AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND
MATERIALS, PHILADELPHIA, PA, 1964:45-87.

M.L. ROESSLE, A. FATEMI, STRAIN-CONTROLLED FATIGUE PROPERTIES OF STEELS AND SOME


SIMPLE APPROXIMATIONS, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE 22 (2000) 495–511

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 79


ADDITIONAL APPROXIMATIONS IN THE STRAIN – LIFE APPROACH

n' 1
b ; c
1  5n ' 1  5n '
NO WIDE ACCEPTANCE YET

MORROW JD. CYCLIC PLASTIC STRAIN ENERGY AND FATIGUE OF METALS. INTERNAL FRICTION,
DAMPING, AND CYCLIC PLASTICITY—ASTM STP 378. AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND
MATERIALS, PHILADELPHIA, PA, 1964:45-87.

M.L. ROESSLE, A. FATEMI, STRAIN-CONTROLLED FATIGUE PROPERTIES OF STEELS AND SOME


SIMPLE APPROXIMATIONS, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE 22 (2000) 495–511

PART II FATIGUE ADVANCED STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 80


Fatigue Strength, (MPa)

Ultimate Tensile Strength, UTS, (MPa) Ultimate Tensile Strength, UTS, (MPa)

STEEL WROUGHT COPPER ALLOYS

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FATIGUE STRENGTH AND ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH APPLIES
FOR A WIDE RANGE OF LOW AND MEDIUM STRENGTH VERSIONS OF MATERIALS ( R W Hertzberg).

PART II FATIGUE STRENGTH OF COMPONENTS 81

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi