Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Foreword
As we speak the Large Hadron Collider is causing statistically a daily holocaust, calculated by the
probability its experiments have to destroy the world, multiplied by the total population of the Earth
and divided by the days it will run till full power.
Any day now the LHC might convert that probability into an experimental fact that will kill us all. It is
for that reason the LHC is a 'monstrosity' in moral, legal and existential terms. And yet it is working
without any 'social alarm'.
One of the reasons this is possible are the lies and statitics the company has passed as 'safety standards'.
The risks indeed do exist and are so high that it was impossible for the company to study them
scientifically with the methods of truth proper of science (pdf. Technology and the future of science, II).
So the company made its workers to sign confidentiality statements of zero risk; it rejected to appear in
court, as it would have become evident in front of a judge that those risks were unbearable to mankind.
Instead it produced a series of Internal Safety documents full of lies and false statistics, which the press
accepted without any serious research. And it repeated constantly an obvious lie: that it was a factory of
Cosmic rays, the debris of supernovas NOT of quark condensates the bombs that cause those
supernovas. This absurd lie that confuses a bomb with its debris, has hidden the likely extinction of
mankind, which has not been discussed seriously by any of the organisms of power of our society,
blinded by their faith in our technological civilization, its safety lies and statistics.
The scientific truths on those risks that we shall prove in this Pdf tell a very different story:
Because the risks of extinction of this planet are so high, each day experiments are performed, the LHC
causes a legal holocaust of millions of human beings. Reason why it should be closed immediately.
Why the press, politicians, the common people and science have merely accepted those lies and
statistics and let the LHC operate is a sociological and industrial question, discussed in the pdf:
'technological genocides'.
Ls
I.
'Safety standards'
Hot strangelets4.
We come to the final risk, strangelets, the most dangerous, probable cause of our extinction in the next
years. The entire paragraph is false. It says that strangelets are hypothetical, when we know they are the
core of most pulsars and quark stars and the only known substance able to produce the supernovas that
leave those stars as a remanent. We studied all the details of its formation. The final two lies say that
the collisions at CERN will be less dense than at RHIC. This is false, CERN has much more luminosity
(density in the bunches that collide) that RHIC. It also says that with more energy there will be less
strange quarks formed. This is false. Everybody knows that energy and mass are self-similar states:
e=mc2. Relativistic mass is produced by accelerating and giving energy to our up and down quarks that
become strange quarks, forming strange liquid… But CERN has 56 times more energy than RHIC; so
it will produce many more strange quarks, and make a bigger strangelet mass-bomb with enough
critical mass to start an ‘ice-9’ reaction. Finally it says that it will collide them at higher temperature.
Again this is false. CERN confuses the concept of temperature and speed, because it does not recognize
that a mass is a cyclical vortex, which has exactly the inverse properties of lineal speed, temperature.
At RHIC we saw a superfluid vortex of zero temperature, super cold. CERN in fact is the coldest point
of the Universe, as it advertises, because the tubes of the quark cannon are designed to create ultra
ordered mass vortices. They move fast but in perfect order; so if temperature measures disorder they
have none.
The temperature concept that CERN uses is one of the 'transcendental illusions' that extend
hyperbolically a local phenomena or a mathematical artifact to the entire reality. If Newton extended
the Cartesian continuous lineal graph of space/time to reality as if the infinite broken vital spaces and
time cycles of reality were one, and Galileo extended 'motion change', defined by one equation v=s/t, as
if it described all the time changes of the universe, CERN extends entropy or temperature, the lineal
vibrations or disorder of a molecular gas, defined by a lineal equation PV=nkT, as if it applied also to
the informative, cyclical, inverse, rotational speed of mass vortices.
Fact is v=s/t is not all the times changes of the Universe but only the change in lineal motion, and
temperature is not all the speeds of the Universe but the lineal speeds of a molecular network of atoms.
Thus, increasing the energy of the collision does not increase the 'temperature' of the liquid vortex, only
the Temperature and intensity of the external big-bang radiation expelled by the vortex where
temperature as a measure of electromagnetic expansion makes sense. Inside the liquid vortex, due to
the balance of a dual E x I = K far from equilibrium system, a higher temperature in those external big-
bang, electromagnetic interactions (Max. Te), means instead the liquid vortex created by strong-force
interactions will cool down (Min. Ti =0k), towards a frozen star.
Increasing the energy does not make the up and down quarks fly apart any faster, once you are in the
strong regime of the vortex, creating quarks from energy. You are making more strange quarks, more
strangelets. Thus the opposite is truth: as the energy is increased in the collision, the formation of
strange quarks increases (energy to mass conversion).
What we could still argue, though Chen’s papers seem definitive in this matter, is how many strange
quarks have to materialize in order for the up, down and strange quarks to reorganize themselves into a
strangelet. The LHC will have Center-of-Momentum collisions of Lead-Lead that does not happen in
nature. The closest would be the very rare Lead nucleus cosmic ray striking a Lead nucleus lying on
the surface of the moon. But because Lead nuclei are so rare in cosmic rays, none have been measured
with anywhere near the energy of the LHC Lead-Lead collisions.
A strangelet is a super fluid vortex of quark-mass, which has no temperature, as its properties are
informative, the inverse of electromagnetic, lineal motions. Yet since CERN does not recognize the
inverse properties of gravitation and electroweak forces, and it does not understand at all Einstein’s
theory of mass, it translates cyclical motion as temperature and it says that strangelets created at CERN
will be hot. They will be ultra cold super fluid vortices, surrounded by ultra cold helium. Those quarks,
when colliding, will form a vortex of information/mass which has opposite inverted properties to those
of temperature. It creates mass, information, negantropy as it increases its order, and becomes first a
super fluid, and then, the final state of matter of quark-condensates, a bosonic crystal-like solid, ‘ice-9’,
the substance that will explode our planet, throw debris of cosmic rays to the Universe and leave
behind a frozen, quark star...
3. Truth vs. authority and celebrity: The high priest and the temple of black masses.
Black holes don’t evaporate, despite the celebrity status of Mr. Hawking.
Even if it won’t be popular, the sheer absurdity of Hawking’s theory and its popular acceptance
requires to consider an element outside physics, namely the celebrity of Mr. Hawking. Mr. Hawking’s
supreme intelligence is an invention of the press, who loves emotional stories of ‘personal courage’ to
sell more and so it has invented that Mr. Hawking is the new Einstein. All those interviewers like
Charlie Rose who called him the most intelligent man on Earth; his site, saying that he was born 300
years after Galileo; his self-biography affirming he was called ‘Einstein’ in the school and he studied
physics instead of the profession of his father, Biology, because ‘intelligent people didn’t study
biology’; his participation in Star Trek, winning an imaginary game with Newton and Albert 5 - you
would expect that such shameless exploitation by the celebrity press of a man ‘in absentia’ for 30 years,
added to the absurd scientific errors of black hole evaporation would have been noticed. And they have,
by many people. But who dares to contradict the sanctified high priest of our technological civilization?
Who, in Iran will raise his voice against the Supreme Council, regardless of truth? An anecdote should
suffice. The first person who discovered frozen stars and pulsars, Mr. Chandra, was an Indian student.
He came to England at great expense and exposed his theory, but Eddington, the astronomer who had
Hawking’s fame and power, said he didn’t believe him, not because his theory was wrong but just
because it could not possibly be truth. Point. No more reasons. Chandra never got his theory of pulsars
accepted till Eddington died. Bohr bluntly put it to him in a letter: Your work is absolutely right and we
all know is right but till Eddington dies, nobody will contradict him. So nobody will contradict the
evaporation of black holes or the cosmic ray argument of CERN, the high priest and the temple, till one
dies and the other kills us all.
Let us quote Johnson3 again: ‘As a laboratory, CERN is mammoth. CERN’s 2008 operating budget
topped $900 million USD. CERN employs around 2,500 people, including more than 1,000 engineers
and scientists. CERN commands a transcendent role within the particle-physics community.
Worldwide, nearly 9,000 physicists are officially involved in CERN’s experiments. CERN brags that
“half the world’s particle physicists” come to CERN for their research. As an intergovernmental
organization, CERN enjoys an elevated status in the world community. CERN has legal personality in
all member states, and it enjoys immunity from legal process in its host countries.’
The Law of silence of our extinction extends in the rooms of thousands of astrophysicists that know
perfectly till Hawking dies nobody will dare to say the truth: black holes don’t evaporate. And none
certainly will deny CERN’s false argument on cosmic rays and put his careers on line. But CERN is not
the temple of a religion of information and life but of energy and death, and so the experiment is the
ultimate black Mass, and indeed a Black Mass is what we shall adore as it forms, the supreme evil, the
absolute simplifier of all complex forms of electroweak matter, the black hole. And to that aim the
rhetoric of luxury and gold is to be found in the cathedral where the invocation will take place: CERN
has built a big machine. CERN proclaims it is “the largest machine in the world.” Indeed, the LHC is
unprecedented in size, power, and cost. The Atlas machine that will invoke God’s particle is compared
to the size of a cathedral. The previous accelerator, the Tevatron was constructed imitating Chartres.
Death always wears a dark robe. In the famous film ‘the 7th seal’6, when Death chooses his side of the
chess, it chooses black. The warrior, Mr. Block thinks he can defeat death, the laws of the Universe. He
thinks he will win the chess game and death will evaporate his dark rope… But the 7 th imaginary
particle that should appear after the 6th quark will not evaporate.
The strategy of CERN is very simple. We have found a magic safe substance, cosmic rays. So no
argument will be effective against us as long as we convince everybody that cosmic rays are doing all
what we do all the time and never blow up the Earth. Thus cosmic rays produce black holes,
strangelets, monopoles, anything you want, all the time in the atmosphere.
This lie repeated ad nauseam could have been tested just asking any expert on cosmic rays, if we have
ever seen dark matter, black holes, monopoles, quark condensates or anything but lonely ions, in
cosmic rays. The thundering no would have raised all alarms, if a few journalists have simply said:
‘This Nuclear Company is lying bluntly to mankind about what they produce. It is not a factory of
cosmic rays but of quark condensates, the most dangerous substance of the Universe.’ But no
journalist has dared to contradict CERN, no cosmic ray expert has dared to say the truth. And so the
company got away with an outright lie that everybody knows is false but nobody dared to deny
because of sheer peer pressure. German soldiers knew Hitler had no idea of military strategy and he
was going to loose the war invading Russia without defeating England first. And yet all went to die to
the Eastern front. So it will happen to the ‘military’ community of Nuclear Physicists. Imagine, Mr. X,
from the University of Arizona, coming out publicly and saying that Mr. Hawking is just a celebrity
case of mass-media exploitation, that his 35 year old theory is obsolete, outdated and false, that CERN
is lying. How long is he going to last in the ‘career of nuclear physics’? CERN has economical and
political power. And as Goebbels said, ‘when a lie is repeated many times, people will believe it’. So
now everybody you ask has read that CERN poises no danger because it is just a factory of cosmic
rays, which is like saying that an atomic bomb is a factory of dust. The mass-bomb of a super-nova is
made of quarks. The debris of the super-nova are the cosmic rays. Black holes suck in the world
towards the future. They don’t evaporate towards the past. In both cases CERN switches the causality
of the arrow of Time. Cosmic rays are the consequence not the cause of a mass-bomb, the debris of the
explosion but the substance that causes the explosion, in the case of CERN’s experiments the quark
condensates it will produce.
So all comes to this safety standard:
CERN lies and makes ‘ad hominem’ campaigns, calling crackpots everybody who denounces those
lies. People do not know physics, but journalists get paid to publish CERN’s articles or they are lazy to
research those lies, so they follow CERN’s dictum. And all becomes a question of ‘personal authority’,
not an argument on truth based in the laws of the scientific method as this book is.
From a legal perspective the Large Hadron Collider is the biggest genocide in
history. A 100% unlikely risk of blowing up the Earth, which is the original
estimate of the company, before it obliged its workers to state zero risk, means
a genocide of 10% x 6.6 billion= 660 million legal dead, by the mere fact of
switching the LHC.
Sancho Vs. DOE et CERN
"There is only one truth, but it requires the right amount of information" In the graph, a bottle
of beer is a ‘probability’ of truth in the first picture. In the 2nd picture it seems more real. In the 3rd
picture nobody will doubt that it is a beer with 100% of certainty. Even if only when we have the bottle
in our hands, we will taste the beer. Science is also a linguistic construction, whose truth depends on
certain logic, mathematical and experimental proofsch.1. Those proofs applied to the quark-gluon
liquids CERN will produce prove without doubt the LHC will create the most explosive substances of
the Universe, which certainly will blow up the Earth, even if only when we die we shall become a
strange liquid.
3) If we use instead of abstract numbers to calculate the whole vortex, a fractal analysis of the organic
particles assembled in the strangelet liquid the reactions taken place in that liquid will be:
1) Creation of kaons, which will transform an up quark into a strange quark, within the proton. This
will be observed as a ūs Kaon, where the u quark dies as an antiparticle, giving birth to a strange
quark. Then those strange quarks will join within the nuclei to the remaining ud quarks forming a
hyperon.
This process has already been observed at RHIC, where at very low energy collisions 70 hyperons were
formed, as many as Helium atoms.
2) Then in the point of collision 2 hyperons will form stable double nuclei, a dibaryon.
It is a process equivalent to the creation of a stable organic soup: Kaons (aminoacids) -> hyperons
(RNA lineal strains) -> Dibaryions (dual DNA strains).
3) Then dibaryons will produce a reversal of time, a key phenomenon in the reproductive systems of
fractal information, in which the previous chain reaction goes backwards (as in the case of the gene-
enzyme reversal). Those dibaryons, which are stable and self-reproductive, feed-back particles, as all
dual energy/information systems are (informative, cyclical women and lineal, energetic males, dual
DNA, etc.), will thus accelerate the reaction. What this means is that dibaryions are the responsible for
an ice-9 reaction, as the usd/usd strains will break, attract new usd particles and start a replicating
process, self-similar to that of DNA in life forms.
Thus we shall all become dibaryions, as dibaryions will be certainly created in the organic quark-gluon
soup and fall to the Earth, eating up quarks once they get tree. While the remaining electronic and pion
cover of the planet, ‘us’, will explode outwards in the big-bang of the Earth’s supernova.
From a macroscopic point of view the center of the Earth will become colder and rotate faster in a
perfect order till reaching near light speed angular velocity and the external cover will radiate outwards
at trillions of degrees into a far from equilibrium birth of a supernova.
Thus, we shall die, because CERNerds, stuck in the paradigms of XVII century Galilean physics -
mechanism, energy/entropy theories and lineal equations – don’t want to understand the complex non-
lineal, quark-gluon soups explained by Rossler, founder chaos theory, and Sancho who discovered the
laws of duality of energy and information, and predicted this scenario. Their theory of mass as physical
information and strangelet formation was called 'twat' physics by Mr. Cox, the spokesman of CERN, a
clear indication of the despise that CERN’s physicists have for all organic forms of life, as if a 'twat', a
woman's sacred organ of life was garbage. Newton said that he was proud to die virgin… Indeed, some
will probably die virgins at CERN. But the first kaon, Kleopatra refused to die virgin. It mated with an
up quark and ate it alive, making it an antiparticle, as a black widow would do. Now Kleopatra, the
black widow, will not die virgin either, but will provoke a massive big-banging of all our up quarks, till
it finally falls from the barge and settles down in the center of the Earth. Her twats/dibaryions, her
DNA-strains will start, unlike Virgin Newton, a reproductive chain of trans/formations of all the quarks
of the Earth into strange matter - her twat physics will produce enough dibaryions to swallow all the
virgin children at CERN, including Mr. Cox, shrunk by the mighty black widow to the size of an atom.
The Universe has warned us many times, asking us to respect the organic laws of reality. After
Cleopatra refused to die, the second warning was the liquid at RHIC. But CERN’s abstract scientists
call information negantropy, negate the organic paradigm, call crackpots those who study the cracks,
the fractal forms that shape reality and itify humanity, calculating obscene probabilities on our Death.
Yet let us imagine the Universe doesn’t kill us this April. If you are reading this book is because it gave
us another chance.
Then in the Fall of Man, 2010, Pb-Pb collisions will form thousands of strains of Dibaryon and those
droplets of strange liquid will fall to the center of the earth, growing and splitting, when they reach the
size of a Bohr radius. At that size they will be packed in tens of thousands and as they break into
smaller pieces they will start a runaway reaction, a mass bomb, an ice-9 reaction, that will blow up the
Earth, around Christmas 2010.
Complexity, information theory has taught us that life blooms also in the world of particles; that
attractors create perfect liquids; that Cleopatra, the reproductive female principle of the Universe must
not be laughed at. For that reason, the quark cannon should be closed now and their children of thought
learn physics of the XXI century before they are let to operate some harmless gadgets in a factory of
toys. The quark cannon is too big of a toy for such little boys.
Their energetic, lineal simplifications of quark gluon liquids grossly misrepresent strangelet and yet
they defend those theories as absolute truths till the end, regardless of the massive proofs obtained at
RHIC. Liquid vortices of information are non-lineal. They reproduce geometrically as reality is
organic, complex, informative, made of motions, hence, blasting with life. Once and again, in all
sciences we find that informative properties dominate energy. For a century astrophysicists wonder
why the Universe has far less entropy they predict. Since reality is informative. This means it is colder,
lives longer, reproduces much faster and it is more stable than ‘energy only theories’ describe it.
For example, our planet is older than we thought, it was cooled down much faster. Many other planets
turn out to have cold, crystalline centers... Complexity theory and Duality is resolving all those puzzles
for decades. In this book’s appendix, we give some examples of the structure of the informative
Universe. But Nuclear Shivaites will have none of it.
In the appendix we study the 3-topological structure of all systems that have a hard, external,
energetic, ‘hotter’ membrane, and an inner, colder, cyclical, informative regions, from your body with a
colder brain to the quark-gluon soup, with an external big-bang and internal cold quark vortex... But all
that hard work that is illuminating all sciences doesn’t penetrate into CERN, the temple of the shivaite
sect of nuclear physicists which searches the Saint Grail of the energetic big-bang and death of our
world.
‘Physicists are often wrong but never in doubt’ Landau
'2 things I consider infinite, the universe and the stupidity of (quantum) physicists and I'm not sure of
the latter’ (Einstein).
The SS-authorities (Strange Scientists) at CERN are wrong. They are indeed infinitely stupid. But they
are never in doubt. So they are making the quark gluon soup, the Zyclon liquid that will blast the Earth.
Only twat theorists can explain this to them. But even Einstein said of her wife that she ‘only
reproduced her stomach’. Ah, indeed, the Universe is a continuous orgasm of creation, of yin and yang,
of strange stomachs. Strange quark stars will become stable between 1 and 10 terabytes in 2010. Top
quark stars will become stable beyond 10 terabytes in 2013. This is what twat physics predicts. It is
mathematically and logically correct. So we have 2 legs of the scientific method that prove our
extinction. And we have experimental hints in Astronomy and Earth’s labs.
So there is a sizeable probability that we die already with the first experiments at 3.5 Tev. Yet if that is
the case you won’t be reading this book. So let us imagine you are reading. It means that the first,
weaker experiment at 3.5 Tev between protons didn’t produce enough stable dibaryons and we are still
here. In that case, since we ‘are still here’, and yet the strangelet scenario for the far more massive Pb-
Pb collisions is still logically and mathematically consistent in all the papers produced by both,
quantum and fractal physicists of (except those experts whose lies are paid by CERN) and we have
experimental evidences of the creation of quark-gluon liquid mini-supernovas at RHIC, we still have 2
events with very strong chances to blow up the planet:
- Strangelet production in lead to lead collisions that will produce strangelet soup in the Fall of 2010.
- Black hole production in 14 Tev collisions of protons that will produce top quark condensates in 2013.
Let us then calculate the chances of those 2 events, hoping you are reading, hoping God gave us a final
chance, and we ‘are still here’, as CERN collides protons at 3.5 Tev…
11. The rules of truth of the scientific method applied to CERN’s theories and risks.
We can now refine the obscene game of statistics CERN does with the life of mankind.
On one hand CERN makes ‘statistics’, which are false about the number of moons that become black
holes (none according to CERN; all in the long term, according to the experimental proofs of dark
matter and the existence of ‘Moon MACHOs’, background holes).
On the other hand, CERN makes statistics about the chances that we all die, giving probabilities to the
main doomsday scenarios – which is always zero according to CERN’s ‘confidentiality statements’ by
‘decree’.
Let us calculate those probabilities not by decree but with the laws of the scientific method, as we have
now much more information about those experiments and the theoretical, experimental and logic legs
of truth, each value as 1/3rd of the total truth of the scientific method that allow us to calculate those
risks.
Indeed to calculate the probabilities of truth according to the scientific method ch.1 a simple ‘tertium
exclusum’ rule applies:
- Theories, which are denied by one of the 3 legs of the scientific method are false:
So the Higgs' particle and the evaporation of black holes are false. They fail not 1 but at least 2 legs of
the scientific method. They are logically inconsistent and lack experimental evidence after more than
30 years of being formulated, a 'reasonable' quantity of time, to have found proofs of their existence.
The same rule means that the Everett interpretation of quantum physics, and all related theories based
in the existence of multiple Universes are false (including Hawking’s explanation of the paradox of
information, another experimental proof of the falsity of his evaporating black holes, which he ‘thinks’
appears in a parallel Universe.) Those theories are full of logical inconsistencies and they have been
experimentally falsified by the many pictures of electronic nebulae, where all the fractal points of the
electron are in this Universe.
- Theories that are mathematically and experimentally correct are useful rules of calculus even if they
are not truth logically. They might still be logically incoherent, which merely means their
‘interpretation’ of the why of reality is false. But they can be used to ‘operate’ and ‘predict’ real effects.
This is the case of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum theory, which is logically inconsistent,
and it should be substituted by the fractal, organic theory, which uses the same mathematics (even
though it can be formulated also with the mathematics of the fractal paradigm, as Nottale has proved).
The same happens with Mr. Heisenberg interpretation of the uncertainty of measure of the quantum
world, which is in the observer NOT in the fractal, quantum world, as he thinks. His ‘why’ is merely a
philosophical interpretation based in mechanism NOT a mathematical theory, and so it is only logically
inconsistent. The proper interpretation given in the appendix is the fractal, organic paradigm: the
uncertainty is in the human observer, which influences with its energetic instruments the behavior and
position of the electronic, fractal herd humans bomb with huge electronic instruments.
- Disputed theories like the big-bang of a ‘cellular Universe’, part of a whole ‘hyper-universe’. It
might or might not be certain in its fractal interpretation, depending on the number of scales the
Universe has.
Yet the cosmic big-bang in the present 'singularity' interpretation where the entire, infinite Universe is
reduced to a point in space-time, self-similar to a super-Nuclear bomb is false, because it fails
experimentally (no shadows in galaxies); logically (hot is synonymous of expanding space so a
singularity cannot be small and hot; and something cannot be born out of nothing – so the space-time
should have been already here); and mathematically (ad Hoc calculus of the ’20 K’ radiation; galactic
cycle older than the big-bang; not enough mass in the singularity to create all the mass of the Universe;
zero explanation of the origin of dark matter, etc. etc).
But a certain number of galaxies might form a super-cluster, or hyper-black hole that exploded in a big-
bang/big crunch cycle. In any case, this theory will NOT be proved making a quark-gluon soup on
Earth and exploding it, which merely can provoke the mini-big bang of Earth, but observing the
Universe with deep-space telescopes, which should show if there are or not galaxies beyond the 13
billion years light age of the big-bang in 2014 (Webb telescope).
- Theories which show mathematical, logical and experimental consistency. They are truth.
Unfortunately the 2 theories we want to calculate here, the strangelet and black hole scenario, both fall
in this category. Yet there is more evidence of the strangelet scenario than the black hole scenario. So
we can give 2 different ‘conservative’ chances: 66-100% chances to the strangelet scenario and 33-66%
chances to the black hole scenario, hoping, background holes do not exist…
All in all it is clear that the 3 theories that justified in the name of science the construction of the LHC,
the Higgs; the hot, cosmic big bang and the evaporation of black holes are proved false by the 3 legs of
the scientific method. So we don’t need a new machine to prove what has been proved wrong.
For 35 years the scientific establishment has looked for Higgs and Hawking’s evaporation everywhere
they asked for and with all type of instruments they recommended. First Hawking said the black holes
would evaporate in the Halo and would be perceived as 'lights in the Christmas tree'. So for 35 years,
we looked at the halo for the signature of evaporation and never found it. Then he said they should be
all over and could be observed by a gamma-ray burst with a satellite, and so we sent the Fermi satellite
to look for signs of evaporation and Fermi found 1400 gamma ray bursts, none of them the signature of
an evaporating black hole. Finally he said it should be observed in an experiment on Earth, so last year
we made the equivalent 'dumb hole' based in the same properties (but evaporating harmless sound) and
it did not emit a single evaporating bleep. If we ad, its mathematical and logical inconsistencies, the
theory is obviously false, what means that if CERN makes black hole, they will eat the Earth.
Thus once it is proved that the LHC should be shut down in ‘the name of true science’, as it is as
probable that it produces Dragoons than Higgs and evaporating black holes, we can now calculate what
the LHC will do for the other goal of science, bio-ethics, the fight for human survival. It certainly will
not increase our survival chances. On the contrary, as it did in the 1 st purpose of true science – real
knowledge about man, God and its Universal details – the LHC scores also a ‘huge zero’ on the 2nd
survival purpose of science: to enhance our survival.
saa
__________
0
Goebbels, a high rank of the Nazi party, was the first Ministry of Industrial Propaganda that mastered the mixture of
industrial ethics (if we can make a machine we must do it even if kills us all), mass-media marketing (massive
repetition of Nazi slogans), visual appeal (uniforms, songs), systematic lies and megalomaniac statements that cater
the natural arrogance of human beings (huge Nuremberg parades, ‘manifest destiny’ of Germany) that made possible
the acceptance by Germans of war and genocides. The same systems are now common among companies that promote
weapons, or produce lethal substances tat cause environmental disasters and yet portray themselves as
environmentally friendly (Nuclear, ‘clean industry’), the embodiment of progress (scientific advancement), certified
by well-paid corrupted experts, harmless (‘our products are safe’) all packed with astounding visuals (television ads,
films about ‘God’s particle’, etc.)
1
LSAG is available at: http://lsag.web.cern.ch/lsag/LSAG-Report.pdf. Mr. Giddings and Mr. Magnano's
paper is available at http://arXiv.org/abs/0806.3381 Both ignore completely LHC’s quark production and the
possible substances it can produce (shown in the graphic), focusing instead on the effects of cosmic rays and
speculating that if moons and neutron stars are not yet converted into black holes, we should not.
2
‘There are lies, damned lies and statistics’ is a sentence attributed to the British Prime Minister Disraeli, who
explained how easily corrupted experts and scholars can lie with their own jargon, in the case of economists, the
jargon of statistics, widely used at CERN to dilute the dangers of extinction.
3
See Johnson’s exhaustive analysis of CERN’s and Nuclear Physicists corruption at: http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.5480
4
We already explained that far from equilibrium quark-gluon soups have a hot cover and a cold interior.
Letessier et al, through a much more thorough analysis than from whom CERN relies on, introduce chemical non
equilibrium into high energy collision consideration. They view that strangelets could decay into omega (sss) particles
hence explaining the fairly significant yield deficiency of thermal models in this respect. Alternatively, they suggest
this above thermal model surplus, as due to non chemical equilibrium strangeness clustering within the qgp. Also
their model explains relation of kaon+/pion yields with increased energy, where CERN completely failed:
http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0003014v1 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0112027v1
http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0209080v2 http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0602047v3
Needless to say its landmark papers have been ignored by CERN, which simply does not acknowledge any scientific
proof, paper or experimental fact that explains the risks of its quark matter factory.
5
‘A brief autography of mine’ By Hawking. You can see the star treck scene at:
http://www.youtube.com/user/EinsteinVsHawking?feature=mhw4#p/u/18/pQEqexzF6rc
6
See ‘7th seal scene at’ http://www.youtube.com/user/EinsteinVsHawking?feature=mhw4#p/u/6/Mq3sqYdhTb8
7
The Fermi satellite failed to observe black hole evaporation. ‘Einstein et al’s letters to the scientific magazine
warning on those results were ignored. Recently the press published hat Fermi has confirmed cosmic rays are the
debris of supernovas NOT its cause. See: http://fermi.gsfc.nasa.gov/
8
The Kaon, the 1st strange particle discovered, was produced in massive quantities in the 1st experiments at CERN.
9
The stable dibaryon was first theorized by Jaffe, http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v38/i5/p195_1 It is now fairly
established that the core of neutron stars is a liquid mixture of dibaryons and hyperons which were produced at RHIC:
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/41917
10
The calculus of legal victims is based on the statistical procedures of the Insurance Industry which determines the
future compensations to the victims of potential catastrophes according to probabilities.