Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ASSIGNMNET-2
During his years in South Africa, his way of thought and life underwent changes.
Every time he came across a new idea he asked if it was worth living up to. This
approach deeply influenced his attitude to books. He read only what was
practically relevant, but when a book gripped his imagination, he meditated on it
made it his bible put its central ideas into action and grew from truth to truth. He
mainly read religious and moral literature and some of the books that influenced
him deeply during his stay in South Africa were Henry David Thoreau’s On the
Duty of Civil Disobedience a ‘masterly treatise’, Leo Tolstoy’s The Kingdom of
God is within You, which overwhelmed him and in which he claimed to have first
discovered the doctrine of non-violence and love, and John Ruskin’s Unto This
Last (1862) whose ‘magical influence’ was a turning point in his life. Inspired by
Ruskin, he decided to live an austere life on a commune. He derived his political
ideas from all these sources and drew inspiration from reading of Western thinkers
like mentioned earlier and Raplh Waldo Emerson.
Gandhi decided to create a place for civil resisters to live in a group environment,
called it the Tolstoy Farm. By this time he had abandoned Western dress for
traditional Indian garb. Two of his final legal achievements in Africa were a law
declaring Indian marriages valid and the end of a tax on Indian labor. Gandhi
regarded his work in South Africa as completed. And he returned to India.
Gandhi was a deeply religious thinker. For him, Truth or cosmic spirit was beyond
all qualities including the moral. As his mother was a deeply religious and he was
brought up seeing her. Shrimad Rajchandra, a Jain philosopher who became
Gandhi’s spiritual mentor, convinced him of “the subtlety and profundity”
of Hinduism, the religion of his birth. And it was the Bhagavadgita, which Gandhi
had first read in London that became his “spiritual dictionary” and exercised
probably the greatest single influence on his life. Two Sanskrit words in
the Gita particularly fascinated him. One was aparigraha (“non-possession”),
which implies that people have to jettison the material goods that cramp the life of
the spirit and to shake off the bonds of money and property. The other
was samabhava (“equability”), which enjoins people to remain unruffled by pain
or pleasure, victory or defeat, and to work without hope of success or fear of
failure. When he went to London he read many attempts were made him accept
Christianity as his religion. But he remained firm. However, he also studied Bible
and Quran and came to conclusion that the principle tenets in all religions are
same. He firmly rejected any religious doctrine that does not appeal to reason and
is in conflict with morality.
When Gandhi returned to India in 1915 he spent an entire year travelling India,
understanding the condition of people. For Gandhi rational discussion and
persuasion were the best way to resolve conflict which was peaceful, non-violence
and respected moral intergrity. His first great experiment in satyagraha came in
1917 in Champaran, looking at the condition of indigo planter he fought with them
and won his first battle of civil disobedience in India. In all his satyagraha’s non-
violence was easily accepted because ahimsa articulated the anti-British feeling, in
the form of Satyagraha. He also introduced method of fasting that this was a form
of suffering love. One of the greatest contributions of Gandhi was his attempt to
unity Hindu-Muslim. For him religion is a personal matter which should not have
place in politics.
There were few critiques by M.N Roy, Rabindranath Tagore and B. R. Ambedkar.
Roy provides a Marxist critique of Gandhi while Tagore’s critique of Gandhi is
most creative, both indigenous and Western-influenced. M.N Roy provided the
best and well-argued Marxist critique of Gandhi’s social and political ideas. Roy’s
attempt was to mix nationalism with what he drew from Marxism. He returned to
India with the sole goal of participating in nationalist struggle, he even founded his
own party- Radical Democratic Party which was later dismantled. According to the
inability of Gandhi to comprehend the changing nature of social and political
forces opposed to prevalent nationalist movement remained at the root of its
failure. He was also critical of the alternative Gandhi offered and critical of the
ideology of non-violence and satyagraha for being politically restrictive; and yet
he found in Gandhi the most effective political leadership in extending the
constituencies of nationalist politics by involving the peripheral sections of society.
Roy was convinced that this Congress-led movement was bound to fail since it
aimed at protecting the exploiting classes, ignoring ‘the political rights of the
workers and peasants’. Roy’s analysis of Gandhi’s constructive programmes
clearly suggests his view of them as basically verbal and couched in sentiment,
rather than as effective programmes involving the masses. In view of these serious
weaknesses, the programmes thus failed to achieve the goals that the Mahatma had
so assiduously set for the masses. According to Roy, these programmes ‘should be
such as to appeal to the immediate interests of the masses of the people’. Roy put
forward a well-argued theoretical model that explained the predicament of the
Gandhi-led nationalist leadership due to its failure to comprehend the mass fervour
confronting both the colonial power and also the indigenous vested interests. Yet
Roy’s analysis of Gandhi from a strictly Marxist point of view, though creative,
failed to understand ‘the cultural power of Gandhi’, and the Mahatma’s ability to
fashion weapons of political struggle out of unorthodox material. This led him to
misconstrue what, in retrospect, was the strength of Gandhi’s politics as ‘an
impotent mysticism’.
While M.N. Roy evaluated Gandhi’s social and political ideas Rabindranath
Tagore critique on India’s cultural heritage and plural ways of life. His critiques
were based on some readings of Indian civilization and struggle against
imperialism. Tagore’s criticism of the boycott of English education. Tagore’s
critique of the aim of the Non-Cooperation Movement drew on his own perception
of the ‘constructive work’ that he experimented with during the 1905–8 swadeshi
movement in Bengal. He was opposed to coercion because his experience of the
swadeshi mobilization had shown him its adverse consequences. He even argued
against charkha and believed that it is not competent to bring us the swaraj or
remove poverty because it was a false expectation that people will automatically be
drawn to spinning, seeking to delink swaraj from charkha. He was critical of the
Mahatma since these neither provided an appropriate alternative to the masses nor
adequately addressed the problem of poverty. It was largely ‘a hollow political
slogan’, as Tagore believed, given the obvious adverse political and economic
consequences on the masses if forced on them. Tagore was perhaps first to
confront the devastating consequences of the application of the principle of
nationalism in the context of the swadeshi movement of 1903–8 in Bengal, when
the schism between the Hindus and Muslims was articulated in a nationalist
language. While Ambedkar introduced new critique by drawing on the dalit
perspective.
CONCLUSION
This tells about the way Gandhi was brought up and his passion to help poor and to
stand against injustice. His life is South Africa was the turning point which made
him raise voice for the first time that was the time when he started his life in
politics. And how religious he was and he respected and tried to gain knowledge
from all religion and made their teachings in his life. When he came to India
looking at the condition here he stood up for justice and equal rights for the poor.
He struggled a lot and was jailed many times but nothing stopped him to fight
back. Most importantly people trusted and united for their rights. For him to gain
the trust he first became like them boycotted western clothes and wore khadi, he
addressed each section of the class and tried to solve their problems without any
non-violence and followed the path of ahimsa.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Sekhar Bandyopandhyay
From Plassey to Partition and After
- Bipin Chandra
History of Modern India
- Bidyut Chakarbarty
Social and Political thoughts of Mahatma Gandhi
- Bhikhu Parekh
Gandhi (article)
- Rundrangshu Mukherjee
Gandhi’s swaraj (article)
- Gandhi’s views on religion (article from - Shodhganga)
- Gandhi’s Religion (J store- M.N Srinivas)
SMRITHI ANNA MATHEW
170316
HISTORY (HONS) 3yr