Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Christopher Coble
Coble 2
Purpose; The purpose of this lab experiment was to find the equilibrant force through performing
vector addition, using trigonometric rules, and by finding the equilibrium force through the process of a
manual lab.
Materials;
Force Table
Four pulleys
String
Plastic Ring
Procedure; Note; when adding the weight, please be sure to consider the weight of the mass
hanger!
1. Attach the four pulleys to the force table. (Do not over tighten, since over tightening may
damage the pulleys). Keep them loose enough to the point where the pulley may still slide while
2. Tie three strings onto the plastic ring in the center of the force table. Attach the other end of the
strings to the plastic hanger and hang each string over an individual pulley. Make sure that the
string is long enough to allow the string to slide around. Also, make sure that the string does not
3. Given two forces, F1 = .075kg x g N at 120۫ and F2 =.05 kg x g N at 45۫ Find the sum of the forces in
the X and Y coordinates, and the resultant force of these two forces.
6. Given a force which is F1 = .15 Kg x g N at 70۫, solve for the x and y components using the law of
sines and cosines, by solving for the components graphically, and experimentally.
7. Add the three vectors, F1= .05 kg x g N @ 30۫ ,F2= .075 kg x g N at 80۫۫, F3= .125Kg x g N at 225۫ to
b. Graphical method
c. Experimentally (with a force table- Add another pulley, weight hanger, and string in
Data;
X-Components Y-Components
.73575Ncos (120۫)= -.36788N .73575Nsin(120۫)= .63717N
.4905Ncos(45۫)=.34684N .4905Nsin(45۫)= .34684N
∑X-Components= -.02N ∑Y-Components= .98365N
Resultant=√(∑X-Components)^2+(∑Y-Components)^2)= .984N @91.2۫
Step 3 Graph
1.5
1
F1
0.5 F2
Resultant
∑Fy(N)
0 Linear (Resultant)
-0.03 -0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 Equilibrant
-0.5 Linear (Equilibrant)
-1
-1.5
∑Fx (N)
X-Components Y-Components
.981Ncos (20۫)= .922N .981Nsin(20۫)= .3355N
.73575Ncos(150۫)= -.6372N .73575Nsin(150۫)= .2679N
∑X-Components= .285N ∑Y-Components=.6034N
Resultant=√(∑X-Components)^2+(∑Y-Components)^2)= .667N @64.72۫
Step 4 Graph
0.8
0.6
0.4 F1
F2
0.2
Resultant
∑Fy
0 Linear (Resultant)
-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1
-0.2 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Equilibrium Force
Linear (Equilibrium Force)
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
∑Fx
X-Components Y-Components
1.962Ncos (0۫)= 1.962N 1.962Nsin(0۫)= 0N
1.4715Ncos(90۫)= 0N 1.4715Nsin(90۫)= 1.4715N
∑X-Components= 1.962N ∑Y-Components=1.4715N
Resultant=√(∑X-Components)^2+(∑Y-Components)^2)= 2.4525N @36.87۫
Step 5 Graph
2
1.5
F1
1 F2
0.5 Resultant
Linear (Resultant)
0 Equilibrium
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Linear (Equilibrium)
-0.5
-1
-1.5
-2
X-Components Y-Components
1.4715Ncos(70۫)= 0.503N 1.4715Nsin(70۫)= 1.3828N
∑X-Components= 0.503N ∑Y-Components=1.3828N
Resultant=√(∑X-Components)^2+(∑Y-Components)^2)= 1.4715N @70۫
1.5
0.5
F1, Step 6
Linear (F1, Step 6)
0
Equilibrant of F1
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6
Linear (Equilibrant of F1)
-0.5
-1
-1.5
-2
X-Components Y-Components
.4905Ncos (30۫)= .425N .4905Nsin(30۫)= .2453N
.73575Ncos(80۫)= .128N .73573Nsin (80۫) =. 725N
1.226Ncos(225۫)= -.867N 1.226Nsin(225۫)= -.867N
∑X-Components= -.314N ∑Y-Components=.103N
Resultant=√(∑X-Components)^2+(∑Y-Components)^2)=.33N @161.84۫
Step 7 Graph
0.15
0.1 F1
F2
0.05
F3
∑Fy
0 Resultant
-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Linear (Resultant)
-0.05 Equilibrant
Linear (Equilibrant)
-0.1
-0.15
∑Fx
Coble 7
Data Analysis; Based upon the data presented above, it can be seen that vector addition is the simplest
method to use to find the resultant and equilibrium force. The equilibrium force is of the same
magnitude as the resultant, but is in the opposite direction (+/- 180) than the resultant. The graphs
serve to prove how effective the vector addition process is by allowing the experiment’s conductor to
plot all the points using the Microsoft Excel program to convey the magnitude and direction of the
resultant and to have a rough estimate of where the equilibrium should be for the actual experiment.
The graphs also serve to show a projection/ image of the forces acting in different directions on top of
the force table while the experiment was being conducted in order to give the reader an image of how it
is that the forces acted when set at different angles, and to explain the reason why the resultants were
of the magnitude and direction shown by the sum of the vectors. The graphs also serve to explain
visually to the reader why it is that the force of equilibrium is in the opposite direction of the resultant;
to ensure that all possible accelerations which would cause a force upon the system of masses are
neutralized (sum up to zero) to prevent any force from acting upon the other forces, thus making the
Regardless of the great data results given by the experiment, however, there were still, as always,
margins of error that kept our experiment from being a perfect equilibrium experiment. The following
percent errors are the result of the friction on top of the pulleys and some minor mathematical
% error for the degree of the resultant and equilibrium values= ((91.2-91)/91) x 100= .22%
Step 4 % errors;
Coble 8
% error for the degree of the resultant and equilibrium values= ((64.72-65)/64.72) x 100=. 01%
Step 5 % errors;
% error for the degree of the resultant and equilibrium values= ((36.87-37)/36.87) x 100= .35%
Step 6 % errors;
% error for the degree of the resultant and equilibrium values= ((70-70)/70) x 100= 0%
Step 7 % errors;
% error for the degree of the resultant and equilibrium values= ((161.84-160)/161.84) x 100= 1.14%
Conclusion; Unfortunately for my group and I, Physics in actuality tends to have many things act
upon one object at one time which keeps many great laboratory experiments and reports like this one
from achieving perfection. One of those factors was, regardless of the fact that it was considered
negligible, the force of friction upon the pulleys. Since this was not taken into consideration, the data
was slightly affected and my group was kept from achieving a perfect laboratory experiment. Another
Coble 9
factor that affected our lab was the inaccuracy in some of the data written while the experiment was
being conducted. Although these problems were immediately fixed, they still played a significant enough
factor to have caused a difference between the experimental and theoretical values of our resultants