Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
This case involves a matter where the petitioner a security guard who was engaged by the
respondent for more than a decade as Security Guard without regularising the petitioner’s
services. The petitioner was initially employed through a private contractor and after contract
labour system was abolished , the respondent continued to engage the contract labour through
an agency called “Priyadarshni Indira Gandhi Co-operative Labour Contract and Society”.
The petitioner even though was in continuous service on daily rated wages and now paid
monthly wages but not on par with the regular workers of the category and have not been
granted permanent status for serving continuously for more than a decade. Being aggrieved
by the decision of the division bench of High Court of Judicature at Madras the petitioner has
sought the apex court to redress his grievance.
Whether the award passed by the Industrial Tribunal is binding only on the parties to the case
or even to the parties of the agreement?
Whether there is violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India for not granting
permanent status and for not paying them wages par to the workers of the same category
despite serving for a decade?
Legislations Referred: