Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Summary of Achievements
March 2016–October 2019
Background
While HIV in Kenya is characterized as a generalized
epidemic, members of key populations (KPs) – including
male and female sex workers, people who inject drugs
(PWID), and men who have sex with men (MSM) –
shoulder a disproportionate burden of HIV in the
country. Compared to a general population prevalence
of 4.7% (UNAIDS, 2019),1 data from the 2010–2011
Integrated Biological Behavioral Survey2 found the
HIV prevalence among female sex workers (FSWs),
MSM, and PWID in Nairobi to be 29.3%,18.2%, and
18.7%, respectively. In addition, modeling studies have
estimated that FSWs contribute to about 14% of new
infections in the country, and MSM contribute to about Peer educators enjoy down time in safe space at Kikuyu Sasa
15% of new infections.3 Given the nature of the HIV Center, Nairobi. Photo: Nancy Coste/FHI 360
Twenty-two of the project’s 25 partners provided direct • Developed KP program monitoring tools—such as the
UIC code and PLHIV tracker—which were adopted by the
service delivery (Table 1). Three other partners were Ministry of Health
responsible for above-site activities. Pact, a strategic
partner for the LINKAGES global program, provided • Established effective crisis response teams and systems
support for organizational capacity building to ensure for reporting and responding to incidents of violence
perpetrated against KP individuals
local KP partners had structures and systems for
efficient program management, monitoring and • Pioneer in preparing CSO implementing partners to receive
evaluation, financial management, and reporting and direct funding and building their capacity in programming
governance. The University of Manitoba was the and financial management—several have been funded by
technical support unit for the National AIDS and STI other donors
Control Program’s (NASCOP) KP program, providing
2
County of Targeted
Partner Coverage Population Leadership
1. Men Against AIDS Youth Group (MAAYGO) Kisumu MSM/MSW MSM Led
Kiambu; Machakos;
13. National Organization for Peer Educators (NOPE) FSW/MSM/MSW
Kitui
Narok
Kitui
Kisumu
Nyamira
MSM/FSW/PWID
John Mathenge, HOYMAS director
No. of DICs
30
No. on ART
30 121 25
400
Under LINKAGES, the DICs became safe spaces where 20 17
16
KP members could relax, be entertained, and also 10 10 200
6
access a comprehensive package of clinical services. 0
4
0
The community’s involvement in establishing the FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
DICs included identification of the space, design, and
No. of KPs
management such as setting rules and guidelines for No. of DIC TX_Curr. @ DIC DIC providing ART
accessing ART
clients to ensure efficiency in service delivery and a at the DICs
welcoming environment. The DICs were branded for
visibility, which helped increase KPs’ awareness of them.
Peer education and peer outreach curriculum. LINKAGES’ success in meeting KP_PREV
targets was associated with the engagement of peer
From the beginning, LINKAGES Kenya engaged peer
educators, for whom capacity was developed, support
educators who reached their peers at hot spots and
provided during monthly meetings, and supervision
referred them for clinical services. They were selected
provided at hot spots. LINKAGES Kenya achieved more
as per national KP implementation Tableguidelines and by KP subgroup
3. FY19 performance than 90% of total targets for KP_PREV over the life of
trained over five days using the national peer education
project (Figure 6).
Percent transitioned
12,306 71%
50000 65%
60% 69% 61%
40000 55%
40%
58,785
30000
42,398 20% Total KPs: 5,132
20000 Total KPs: 1,355 Total KPs: 1,288
0% 1,315 3,627 195
10000 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY18/19
334 997 24 319 949 20
2,107 1,840 Total FSWs MSM
0
Number of KP members Number who Number who Number successfully Number
reached with HIV received testing tested positive linked to ART currently on ART
prevention interventions services
MSM/MSW FSWs PWID
re 4. MSM Figure
and FSWs annualand
5. MSM cohort
FSWstransition
annual cohort Figure 6. Number of KP individuals reached against
transition Figure 5.
target byNumber
FY of KP individuals reached against target by FY
100%
61%
No. of KP individuals
60%
100%
55% 60,000
78,473
40%
71,399
57,401
86,802
40,000
72,811
75,328
66,440
50%
20%
55,000
20,000
0%
FY16/17 FY17/18 FY18/19 0 0%
FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
Total FSWs MSM
Target Achieved % Achieved
6
The success is also attributed to stronger links HIV testing services and case finding
between the program and peer educators as a result Lay counselors, nurses, and clinical officers offered
of the supporting role of outreach workers (OWs)— HTS as per national guidelines as a LINKAGES key
outstanding peer educators whose capacity was intervention. From April to September 2019, LINKAGES
strengthened to coordinate activities as well as mentor introduced new strategies in an attempt to increase
and supervise other peer educators. HIV case detection among KPs. Strategies included
implementation of risk assessments to determine
Among FSWs, coverage improved from about 47,000
eligibility for testing as well as index testing, risk
in FY16 to more than 58,000 in FY19. In addition,
network referral (RNR), and the enhanced peer
the engagement of FSWs in program implementation
outreach approach (EPOA).4 The result was increased
increased ownership of interventions and influenced
case identification and greater efficiency. During
more to access treatment at the DICs. Two
Q4 FY19, the number of tests reduced by over 50%
implementing partners were led by FSWs.
compared with the previous quarter with case finding
In other organizations not led by FSWs, LINKAGES improving from 1.9% in Q3 to 3.6% in Q4 (Figure 7).
endeavored to ensure priority in implementation roles Figures 8 and 9 show the trends in uptake of testing
Figure 7.6.Trends
Trendsin
inHTS uptakeand
HTS uptake andnew
newcase
case identification
identificationfor
for
allall KPs,
KPs, FY16–FY19
FY16–FY19
301
22,721
22,801
% diagnosed
245
No. of KPs
3.0%
19,749
19,241
17,500 286
18,833
18,880
18,433
2.4%
17,511
15,000 2.5%
15,972
10,656
Figure
Figure 7.
7. Uptake
Uptake of
of prevention
prevention and
and testing
testing among
among FSWs, FY16–FY19
FSWs,FSWs,
FY16–FY19
Figure 8. Uptake of prevention and testing among FY16–FY19
70,000 2.4% 2.5%
70,000 2.2% 2.4% 2.5%
1,864 2.2%
2.0% 1,864 2,866
60,000 2.0% 2,866
60,000 2,596 2.0%
2,596 1.7% 2.0%
50,000 1,522 1.7%
50,000 1,522
997
FSWs
709
positive
997 1.5%
No.No.ofofFSWs
709
%%positive
40,000 1.5%
40,000
720
720
30,000 60,786
30,000 491 60,786 55,919 1.0%
491 51,418 55,919 1.0%
46,092 51,418
20,000 46,092 39,809 41,401
20,000 39,809 41,401
32,302 0.5%
23,886 32,302 0.5%
10,000 23,886
10,000
- 0.0%
- Reached Tested Reached Tested Reached Tested Reached Tested 0.0%
Reached Tested Reached Tested Reached Tested Reached Tested
FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
Figure
Figure 9. Uptake of preventiontesting
and testing among MSM, FY16–FY19
Figure 8.
8. Uptake
Uptake of
of prevention
prevention and
and testing among
among MSM,
MSM, FY16–FY19
FY16–FY19
20,000 5.0%
20,000 5.0%
4.1% 783 1,050
4.1% 783 1,050
1,004 3.8%
16,000 3.6% 1,004 3.8% 4.0%
16,000 3.6% 2.7% 4.0%
2.7%
334
12,000 334 3.0%
positive
MSM
12,000 3.0%
%%positive
484
No.No.ofofMSM
484
319
321 16,602 319
8,000 321 16,602 15,757 2.0%
8,000 14,819 15,757 2.0%
14,819
169 11,972
169 11,972
4,000 9,298 8,167 1.0%
4,000 9,298 7,530 8,167 1.0%
7,530
4,541
4,541
- 0.0%
- 0.0%
Reached Tested Reached Tested Reached Tested Reached Tested
Reached Tested Reached Tested Reached Tested Reached Tested
FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
and case finding over the life of project for FSWs and client details on services received at ART clinics and
MSM, respectively. ensure PLHIV accessing ART from linked facilities were
followed up and services received were documented.
LINKAGES also supported a gradual increase in the
ART linkage and retention
number of DICs that provided ART directly. This
LINKAGES tracked clients across the prevention and resulted in a steady growth of the ART linkage rate for
treatment cascade, and strong efforts were made to both FSWs and MSM and an increase in the percentage
ensure newly diagnosed KP members were linked of MSM on treatment who achieved viral suppression
to ART and achieved viral suppression. The project (Figure 10).
developed a PLHIV client tracking tool to help capture
8
Figure 9. Linkage to treatment and viral load suppression rates among FSWs and MSM, FY16–FY19
Figure 10. Linkage to treatment and viral load suppression rates among FSWs and MSM, FY16–FY19
Figure 9. Linkage to treatment and viral load suppression rates among
Though LINKAGES Kenya was primarily a prevention program with majority of individuals receiving
120%
treatment at linked facilities, the project began tracking viral load data beginning in FY18
Though LINKAGES Kenya was primarily a prevention program with majo
98% 120%
100% 95% 97% treatment at linked facilities,
95% 96% the project began tracking viral load
% achieved
82% 98%
79%
81% 100%
78% 95% 97%
80% 74% 76% 75%
% achieved
82% 81%
79% 78%
80%
60%
60%
40%
FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
FSW 40% MSM
FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY16
% linked to ART % virally supressed
FSW
LINKAGES
Figure engaged county
0. Proportion ofhealth management
KPs linked to treatment at LINKAGES-supported DICs
teams in ensuring the DICs met criteria for Figure 11. Proportion of KPs linked to
accreditation to be community ART sites. As the Figuretreatment at LINKAGES-supported
0. Proportion DICs
of KPs linked to treatment at LINKAGES-supporte
number of DICs 18 offering ART increased so did the50%
45% 44%
proportion of KPs accessing treatment services
45%
from the DICs.16By the end of project, 44% of MSM 18 50%
40% 45% 44%
and 45% of FSWs preferred to be linked at the 40%
45%
DICs and were14accessing ART there (Figure
39% 11). 16
40%
35% 40%
12 31% 14
Addressing structural barriers
% linked at DIC
39%
30%
No. of DICs
35%
10 12 31%
LINKAGES Kenya supported17%each implementing
% linked at DIC
25% 30%
partner to develop and implement activities that
No. of DICs
8 16 10
would help address structural barriers to access 20% 17%
25%
to services by KPs,
6
particularly GBV. This included
8 16
9% staff and beneficiaries 15%
sensitization of program 20%
on how to identify
4 GBV as well 8%as how to report 6
10% 9%
incidents of violence. Partners were10supported 15%
to develop crisis2 response teams,
6 which were 5% 4 8%
10 10%
multidisciplinary and led
4 by MSM and FSWs who
helped to develop0 a reporting system for GBV in 0% 2 6 5%
line with the nationalFY16 FY17
KP program. FY18 FY19
Each partner 4
also instituted a hotline which was used to report 0 0%
# DICS providing ART FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
incidences of violence in the community.
% FSWs linked at DIC
# DICS providing ART
In collaboration with the Key Affected
% MSM Population
linked at DIC
Health and Legal Rights Alliance (KESWA) and % FSWs linked at DIC
prevention, among KPs. The activities centered on identifier codes (UIC) and the PLHIV tracker — to
providing technical assistance and capacity building collect other data necessary to effectively monitor
support to KP community networks and organizations KP programming. The national program adopted
to conduct human rights advocacy. KESWA worked some of these tools for use by all KP implementing
with 13 LINKAGES implementing partners across seven partners. The project also introduced an individualized
counties. Together, they established county advocacy tracking system, called e-cascade, which the partners
subcommittees; conducted media sensitization for implemented to capture individual KP data across HIV
35 individuals (KPs and media persons); established prevention and treatment services.
crisis response teams in counties of implementation;
and engaged religious leaders, police, judiciary and LINKAGES engaged the program implementation team
other law enforcers on the rights and needs of KPs. and the MOH in revising the tools to capture additional
data required by USAID and to improve documentation
Pact’s human rights activities were implemented in of KPs accessing services across different program
two counties and focused on adapting and integrating areas. LINKAGES also involved CSOs in the creation
an economic empowerment model, called WORTH, and implementation of the M&E system, resulting in
with human rights advocacy by uniquely combining enhanced competencies in monitoring, data analysis,
community banking, enterprise development, and and use of data for decision-making to improve
human rights training. By the end of the initiative, six coverage and quality of services.
WORTH groups with 96 members had been established
and had grown their savings to a total of $2,300. The LINKAGES Kenya team conducted refresher
trainings and online capacity building activities each
year for M&E, clinical, and program staff members
Monitoring and evaluation systems strengthening on data analysis and use. CSOs improved their
LINKAGES Kenya supported the development of an understanding of program indicators and how to
efficient and sustainable monitoring and evaluation conduct internal data quality assessments and
(M&E) system at the country project level and for verification, leading to improved data quality.
the CSOs supporting project implementation. The
process included a review of reporting tools and KP Formation of innovative partnerships
data captured to ensure the data necessary for tracking
project performance was obtained. For sustainability, Innovative partnerships were key to LINKAGES’ success
LINKAGES adopted national MOH tools in tracking in Kenya. LINKAGES expanded ARV provision from four
activities, but added new tools — such as unique to 16 DICs in partnership with county departments of
Peers relaxing at the safe space in Mamboleo Peer Empowerment Group (MPEG) drop-in center, Thika. Photo: Nancy Coste/FHI 360
10
LINKAGES Kenya partnered with Jilinde, a Bill & Melinda John Odada, NYDESO director
Gates Foundation-funded project led by Jhpiego, to
provide PrEP within LINKAGES sites. Jilinde’s objective
was to learn the best method for PrEP distribution and implementation of institutional strengthening
among adolescent girls and KPs within three regions plans, and annual assessments of progress using the
in Kenya. LINKAGES provided the infrastructure for Organizational Performance Index
provision, while Jilinde provided medications and
additional support where needed; for instance, by • Support of local implementing partners to apply for
providing human resources for service provision, funding funding from other donors; NYDESO, MPEG, Tamba
outreach, and reporting. Through this partnership, six Pwani, MPEG, MAAYGO, BHESP, and MAAYGO were
LINKAGES-supported local implementing partners were all funded
involved in PrEP provision. As a result, 6,579 FSWs and
3,143 MSM were initiated on PrEP by September 2019. Policy Impact
In addition to expanding access to high-quality
Strengthening of Local Partner Capacity services among KPs, building local partner capacity,
LINKAGES implemented different strategies to enhance and strengthening national and local monitoring
sustainability of interventions in line with USAID’s of KP programming in Kenya, the LINKAGES team
journey to self-reliance. These included: worked closely with the MOH to develop evidence-
based policies and guidelines inclusive of KPs and to
• Integration of services within the public health create space for KP community members’ voices in
system; DICs providing ART have been linked to government-led technical working groups. National
county facilities, and county health care workers policy documents that LINKAGES Kenya was involved in
sensitized on provision of KP-friendly services developing or updating included:
• Provision of financial and technical assistance • National Implementation Guidelines for HIV and STI
to county and national technical working groups Programming Among Young Key Populations
to develop their capacity for coordination of KP
programming stakeholders and review of various • Framework for the Implementation of Pre-Exposure
guidelines and tools to ensure more efficient Prophylaxis of HIV In Kenya
implementation • Kenya National Guidelines for Prevention,
• Engagement of KP-led organizations in program Management, and Control of Sexually Transmitted
design and implementation, financial management, Infections
and resource mobilization • Violence Prevention and Response Programming
• Engagement of MSM-led and FSW-led organizations for Key Populations in Kenya: Standard Operating
and building their capacities to implement HIV Procedure
programming
Future Directions
On October 1, 2019, LINKAGES Kenya transitioned
Linkages across the
to Meeting Targets and Maintaining Epidemic Continuum of HIV Services
Control (EpiC), a five-year, global project funded for Key Populations Affected
by the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS
Relief (PEPFAR) and the United States Agency for by HIV (LINKAGES)
International Development (USAID). Building upon
is a global cooperative agreement funded
the successful investments in KP programming
under LINKAGES, EpiC is designed to break through by USAID through PEPFAR. Led by FHI 360
remaining, persistent barriers to the 95-95-95 goals with partners Pact, IntraHealth International,
and promote self-reliant management of national
HIV programs. In Kenya, EpiC will work directly and the University of North Carolina at
with two implementing partners in Nairobi county Chapel Hill, LINKAGES has worked in more
and provide technical support to nine other county
than 30 countries since 2014 to reduce
implementing partners and their subgrantees.
Together, this EpiC team will focus on filling existing HIV transmission among key populations —
HIV prevention, case finding, and treatment gaps, sex workers, men who have sex with men,
and on building capacity for a locally led, sustainable
response to the epidemic in Kenya. transgender people, and people who inject
drugs — and to improve their enrollment and
retention in care.
This brief is made possible by the generous support of the American people through USAID and PEPFAR through the terms
of cooperative agreement #AID-OAA-A-14-00045. The contents are the responsibility of the LINKAGES project and do not
necessarily reflect the views of USAID, PEPFAR, or the United States Government.
Suggested citation: LINKAGES. LINKAGES Kenya: Summary of Achievements, March 2016–October 2019. Durham (NC): FHI 360; 2019.
1
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). UNAIDS data 2019. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2019. Available from: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/2019-UNAIDS-data_en.pdf.
2
National AIDS and STI Control Programme (NASCOP). 2010–2011 Integrated biological and behavioural surveillance survey among key populations in Nairobi and Kisumu, Kenya. Nairobi: Ministry of
Health, Kenya; 2014.
3
Kenya National AIDS Control Council (KNACC). Kenya HIV prevention response and modes of transmission analysis. Nairobi: KNACC; 2009.
4
For more information about EPOA, please see LINKAGES Enhanced Peer Outreach Approach Implementation Guide.