Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
0DLQWHQDQFH
WUDLQLQJFRXUVHV
DVN
RXU8 XVDERXW
7KHNQRZOHGJHSDWKIRU 36.
0HP ,//9,3
VWDIILQWKHLUZRUNHQYLURQPHQW EHU
3URJ VKLS
7UDLQLQJ1HHGV$QDO\VLVVNLOOVLPSURYHPHQWIRU\RXUVWDIIWRGD\ UDP
7KH71$HQDEOHVWKLVFUXFLDOXQGHUVWDQGLQJE\FRPELQLQJ6.)5HOLDELOLW\6\VWHPVH[SHUL
HQFHLQWUDLQLQJDQGRXUNQRZOHGJHRIPDLQWHQDQFHDQGUHOLDELOLW\
&ODVVURRPDQGRQVLWHWUDLQLQJFRXUVHVZLWKKDQGVRQDSSOLFDWLRQVGLUHFWO\WUDQVIHUDEOH
WRWKHZRUNSODFH
6HOISDFHGOHDUQLQJWKURXJKRQOLQHDQGFRPSXWHUEDVHGFRXUVHV
&XVWRPLVHGFRXUVHVVSHFL¼FWR\RXULQGXVWU\DQGDSSOLFDWLRQ
&RPSUHKHQVLYHFRXUVHVWKDWFRYHUDOODVSHFWVRIPDFKLQHUHOLDELOLW\IURPDVVHW
PDQDJHPHQWWREDVLFPDLQWHQDQFHVNLOOV
1DWLRQDOO\DQGLQWHUQDWLRQDOO\DFFUHGLWHGFRXUVHV
H[SHUWLQVWUXFWRUVZKRKDYH\HDUVWHDFKLQJH[SHULHQFH
4XDOLW\SURFHVVGHYHORSHGWKURXJKSURYHQOHDQ6LJPDDQG,6$WHFKQLTXHV
)RUIXUWKHULQIRUPDWLRQRQ3XEOLF&RXUVHRUWRRUJDQLVHDQ2QVLWH&RXUVH
3KRQHRU(PDLOUVPDUNHWLQJ#VNIFRP
7KH3RZHURI.QRZOHGJH(QJLQHHULQJ ZZZVNIFRPDXWUDLQLQJ
SKF Reliability Systems
Training Calendar 2011
January July
SUN 30 2 9 16 23 SUN 31 3 10 17 24
ICR
MON 31 3 10 17 24 MON 4 IR1 LF1 11 18 25 IR1
ICR VA1
TUE 4 11 18 25 TUE 5 IR1 LF1 12 BTM 19 BTM IRW LF1 ESA 26 IR1
BTM
RCM
LF1
ICR VA1
THU 6 13 20 27 THU 7 IR1 BTM 14 BTM 21 BTM 28 IR1
BTM
RCM
EMM
ICR
FRI 7 14 21 28 FRI 1 8 IR1 BTM 15 22 29 IR1
February August
SUN 6 Waitangi Day (NZ) 13 20 27 SUN 7 14 21 28
SAT 5 12 19 26 SAT 6 13 20 27
March September
SUN 6 13 20 27 SUN 4 11 18 25
Canberra Day (ACT)
MON 7 Labour Day (QLD) 14 Labour Day (VIC) 21 IR2 28 MON 5 12 OAM 19 26
TUE 1 BTM 8 BTM RCB 15 VA1 LF1 22 IR2 OAM BTM RCB 29 MP1 ESA TUE 6 BTM ML1 EMM 13 OAM BTM IRW ESA 20 RCB SST PSA 27 ESA
WED 2 BTM IRW 9 BTM RCB LF1 16 VA1 LF1 EMM 23 IR2 OAM BTM RCB 30 MP1 WED 7 BTM ML1 EMM MP1 14 OAM BTM IRW 21 RCB SST 28
THU 3 BTM IRW 10 BTM LF1 17 VA1 EMM 24 IR2 OAM BTM 31 THU 1 OA 8 BTM ML1 MP1 15 OAM BTM IRW 22 29
SAT 5 12 19 26 SAT 3 10 17 24
April October
SUN 3 10 17 24 SUN 30 2 9 16 23
Easter Monday Queen’s Birthday (WA)
MON 4 11 18 25 Anzac Day MON 31 3 Labour Day (NSW, ACT, SA) 10 17 24 IR1 Labour Day (NZ)
LF1
TUE 5 BTM LF1 RCB 12 BTM VA1 19 SMP 26 Bank Holiday (TAS) TUE 4 OA 11 ICR BTM VA1 18 BTM SRC EMM
ESA 25 IR1 BTM VA1
WED 6 BTM LF1 RCB EMM 13 BTM VA1 20 SMP 27 WED 5 OA RCB 12 ICR BTM VA1 19 BTM SRC EMM LF1 26 IR1 BTM VA1
THU 7 BTM EMM 14 BTM VA1 21 28 THU 6 OA RCB 13 ICR BTM VA1 20 BTM SRC 27 IR1 BTM VA1
May November
SUN 1 8 15 22 29 SUN 6 13 20 27
MON 2 IR1 Labour Day (QLD) 9 16 23 MSR 30 MON 7 UT1 VA2 14 21 IR1 28 IR2 VA3
THU 5 IR1 EMM ICR 12 BTM LF1 19 BTM ML1 26 SPI BTM ML1 VA1 THU 3 BTM EMM LF1 10 UT1 VA2 ML1 LF1 17 BTM 24 IR1 BTM
SAT 7 14 21 28 SAT 5 12 19 26
June December
SUN 5 12 19 26 SUN 4 11 18 25 Christmas Day
MON 6 Foundation Day (WA) 13 Queen’s Birthday (AUS) 20 27 MON 5 12 19 26 Boxing Day
Queen’s Birthday (NZ)
LF1 RCB
TUE 7 BTM EMM
SMP
ESA 14 BTM 21 BTM
VA1
LF1 SST 28 ML1 TUE 6 BTM RCB 13 20 27
THU 2 9 BTM 16 BTM IRW DB 23 BTM VA1 EMM 30 ML1 THU 1 IR2 VA3 8 BTM 15 22 29
SAT 4 11 18 25 SAT 3 10 17 24 31
SKF Public Course Locations
BTM Bearing Technology BTM Campbellfield ESA Easylaser Shaft ICR VICTORIA LF1 VICTORIA PSA Precision Shaft SMP Selecting & Maintaining
& Maintenance (WE201) 21-23 June Alignment Oakleigh Oakleigh Alignment L1 Power Transmission
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL Geelong NEW SOUTH WALES 13-14 October 7-8 June (WE240) Systems L1
TERRITORY Smithfield WESTERN AUSTRALIA TASMANIA NEW SOUTH WALES (WE290)
9-10 August
Canberra Gippsland 29 March Perth Launceston Smithfield VICTORIA
21-23 June QUEENSLAND 23-24 August 11-12 May 20 September Oakleigh
5-7 April
NEW SOUTH WALES Archerfield Warnambool WESTERN AUSTRALIA 2-3 August
Horsham Infrared
Bathurst 7 June IR1 18-19 October Perth WESTERN AUSTRALIA
8-10 February Thermography L1 Rivervale
22-24 March Mackay WESTERN AUSTRALIA 6 July
Oakleigh (WI230) 19-20 April
Bega 19 July Kalgoorlie
5-7 April
22-24 March QUEENSLAND PMS Proactive NEW ZEALAND
25-27 October Townsville Archerfield 9-10 November Maintenance Skills L1
Cobar Perth Auckland
Shepparton 16 August 25-29 July (WE241)
23-25 August SOUTH AUSTRALIA VICTORIA 7-8 June
13-15 September VICTORIA 9-10 March
Coffs Harbour Wingfield NEW ZEALAND Oakleigh Spare Parts
TASMANIA Melbourne
22-24 November Launceston 8 November Auckland 22-26 August SPI Management &
21-25 February
Dubbo 1-3 March VICTORIA 22-23 August Inventory Control L1
2-6 May Reliability Centered
7-9 June WESTERN AUSTRALIA Oakleigh Christchurch RCM (WC230)
24-28 October Maintenance (RCM) VICTORIA
Mudgee Bunbury 22 February WESTERN AUSTRALIA 24-25 August (MS332) Oakleigh
9-11 August WESTERN AUSTRALIA
15-17 November Perth Machinery Lubrication VICTORIA
26-27 May
Muswellbrook Geraldton Kalgoorlie ML1
21-25 November & Oil Analysis L1 Oakleigh
22-24 February 26-28 July 27 September NEW ZEALAND Streamlined Reliability
(WE265) 26-28 July SRC
Newcastle Kalgoorlie Karatha 4-8 July NEW SOUTH WALES Centered Maintenance
11-13 October 14-16 June 18 October
Smithfield RCB Root Cause Bearing (SRCM) (MS331)
Orange Perth Infrared Failure Analysis L2 WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Karatha IR2
Thermography L2 8-10 November (WE204)
13-15 September 22-24 March 13 September QUEENSLAND Rivervale
NEW ZEALAND VICTORIA NEW SOUTH WALES
Smithfield Perth Archerfield 18-20 October
Hamilton Melbourne Muswellbrook
10-12 May 15-17 February 24-26 May
3 May 21-25 March 22-23 March Ultrasonic Testing L1
25-27 October 24-26 May SOUTH AUSTRALIA UT1
WESTERN AUSTRALIA Orange (WI320)
Wollongong 9-11 August Electric Motor Perth Wingfield QUEENSLAND
EMM 8-9 March
19-21 July 25-27 October Maintenance L1 28 November- 9-11 August Archerfield
QUEENSLAND
Smithfield
Port Hedland NEW SOUTH WALES VICTORIA 7-11 November
2 December 9-10 August
Archerfield Muswellbrook Oakleigh
13-15 September QUEENSLAND
10-12 May PAPUA NEW GUINEA 18-19 October Infrared Thermography 6-8 September Archerfield VA1 Vibration Analysis L1
IRW Workshop L1 (WI210)
11-13 October Lae Orange WESTERN AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES 5-6 April NEW SOUTH WALES
Blackwater 23-25 August 2-3 November Perth
Newcastle Gladstone Smithfield
6-8 December Port Moresby Smithfield 28-30 June
13-14 September NEW ZEALAND
21-22 June 26-28 July
Bundaberg 13-15 April 16-17 February
Smithfield Auckland Mt Isa QUEENSLAND
7-9 June FIJI QUEENSLAND
17-18 May 17-19 May 6-7 December Archerfield
Cairns Lautoka Archerfield
QUEENSLAND Townsville 25-27 October
13-15 April 12-14 July 22-23 June Maintenance Planning
Archerfield MP1 22-23 February Gladstone
Emerald Suva Gladstone & Scheduling L1 NORTHERN TERRITORY
2-3 March 24-26 May
12-14 July 6-8 July 6-7 September (WC200) Darwin
Gladstone
SOUTH AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND
Mackay
NEW ZEALAND Mackay Wingfield 23-24 August
Archerfield 15-17 March
22-24 March Auckland 7-8 June SOUTH AUSTRALIA
16-17 February SOUTH AUSTRALIA
18-20 October 8-10 March SOUTH AUSTRALIA 29-30 March Wingfield
VICTORIA Wingfield
Mackay Christchurch Wingfield Oakleigh
WESTERN AUSTRALIA 5-6 October
Perth 21-23 June
6-8 September 11-13 October 4-5 May 19-20 July WESTERN AUSTRALIA VICTORIA
Moranbah Dunedin VICTORIA 7-8 September Karatha
WESTERN AUSTRALIA Oakleigh
17-19 May 6-8 December Albury Perth 31 May-1 June
MSR
Maintenance Strategy 16-18 August
Mt Isa Greymouth 22-23 November 15-16 June Review (MSR) Perth WESTERN AUSTRALIA
21-23 February 22-24 November Oakleigh Awareness L1 10-11 May Perth
Rockhampton Hamilton 6-7 April Introduction (MS230) 20-21 September
LF1
to Lubrication 12-14 April
16-18 August 22-24 March WESTERN AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES NEW ZEALAND NEW ZEALAND
Karatha Fundamentals L1 Smithfield
Toowoomba Lower Hutt NEW SOUTH WALES
Hamilton Auckland
8-10 March 16-18 August 3-4 August 23-25 May 1-2 November 11-13 October
Perth Muswellbrook
Townsville Mt Maunganui 26-27 July Oil Analysis L2 Sealing Solutions
15-17 November 12-14 April 27-28 July OA
QUEENSLAND
SST VA2 Vibration Analysis L2
NEW ZEALAND Orange Technology Seals for (WI203)
NORTHERN TERRITORY Napier Archerfield
Christchurch 24-25 May Rotary Applications QUEENSLAND
Darwin 10-12 May 4-6 October NEW SOUTH WALES
16-17 March Smithfield Archerfield
16-18 February Nelson WESTERN AUSTRALIA Smithfield
15-16 March 22-26 August
SOUTH AUSTRALIA 6-8 September Improving Crusher Perth
QUEENSLAND 23-24 August WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Mt Gambier New Plymouth
ICR
Reliability 30 August- QUEENSLAND
Gladstone Perth
10-12 May 12-14 July (WI270) 1 September Archerfield
19-20 July 7-11 November
Whyalla Palmerston North NEW SOUTH WALES 22-23 November
Toowoomba Optimising Asset
6-8 July 14-16 June Newcastle OAM SOUTH AUSTRALIA VA3
Vibration Analysis L3
2-3 November Management through (WI204)
Wingfield Timarru 4-5 May Wingfield
Townsville Maintenance VICTORIA
22-24 March 1-3 November Smithfield 24-25 May
21-22 June Strategy L2 Oakleigh
13-15 September Whangarei 11-12 October NORTHERN TERRITORY (MS300) VICTORIA
VICTORIA QUEENSLAND Oakleigh 28 November-
22-24 February Darwin QUEENSLAND
2 December
Albury Archerfield Brisbane 20-21 September
5-6 April
10-12 May DB Dynamic Balancing (L1) 24-25 February SOUTH AUSTRALIA 12-15 September WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Ballarat (WE250) SOUTH AUSTRALIA Perth
VICTORIA Wingfield WESTERN AUSTRALIA
19-21 July Wingfield Perth 21-22 June
Oakleigh 4-5 July
Bendigo 25-26 August 22-25 March
15-17 November 16 June
T
he PMO2000 ® (our unique approach) • Creates a closed loop system that makes
Process has always been a simple and investigations into losses very efficient and
effective means for you and your team highly effective
to understand the principles of reliability
International clients:
and how to deploy them. Our systems are built The Benefits
• Indonesia around simplicity, not complexity, but they work in
any capital intensive organisation. Our clients Put simply, successful implementation of our
• Malaysia
range from the current holder of the North program results in a reduction in maintenance
• Philippines American Maintenance Excellence awards to related downtime by one half. This can be
• Taiwan companies that are yet to install a computerised achieved site wide in 12 months.
maintenance management system.
• New Zealand • Reduced reactive or emergency
We help you create a culture of “Zero tolerance maintenance activities
• North America to unexpected failure”. We are not a company • Increased workforce productivity while
• Chile that just helps you write a maintenance strategy providing greater job satisfaction
- we assist you to deploy a reliability assurance
• South Africa • Reduced costs of spares and overall
program which is a living program.
maintenance activity
• Holland We will also assist you with a change of culture
• Saudi Arabia not only in your maintenance departments, but Our Strategy
within the production areas as well. This is
because we view reliability and maintenance as Our current strategy is to attract more local
processes not as departments. business than overseas business.
We are also highly experienced in assisting you If you suffer more reactive maintenance
develop corporate reliability assurance initiatives. than you should - contact us
Our reliability improvement software, PMO2000,®
For more information please contact our
is now SAP ® certified and can seamlessly pass
Melbourne office and arrange for us to provide
information to and from SAP. All the other modules
®
you with a presentation.
of our full suite of Reliability Assurance software
packages can also be directly integrated with SAP. ®
Contact us
How the process helps you Steve Turner
Director and Principal Consultant
• Defines what maintenance is value adding and
OMCS International
what is not and keeps this up to date
Email: steve@omcsinternational.com
• Trains and motivates your staff to build reliability Mobile 0419 397 035
concepts into their daily activities
• Groups all your results into practical schedules Or contact any of our local or global
and works to quickly implement what has licensees through our website at
SAP® Certified
Powered by SAP NetWeaver ® been learned www.reliabilityassurance.com
2011 RELIABILITY AND APOLLO
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS BOO
O K
TRAINING SCHEDULE NLIN
E
ARMS Reliability offer a range of reliability training courses for glo @ balre
engineers, maintenance professionals and asset managers liabil
ity.co
looking to learn more about RCM, Availability, Asset Management, m
RAMS Analysis, FaultTree and Root Cause Analysis.
RELIABILITY TRAINING
CM Is An Insurance Policy
34 Mill Downtime Tracking Database Analysis Condition Monitoring and automatic lubrication
Identifying short term strategies to improve Mill systems can reduce the risk and costs associated
Availability and then put into place long term with unforeseen breakdowns.
strategies to sustain this uptime.
Green CMMS The Engine of Sustainability
42 Maintenance News The move to be green is more than just a fad or
The latest maintenance news, products and services. buzzword, but rather a key component of an effective
maintenance operation.
46 Maintenance Books
To Subscribe to the AMMJ go to www.maintenancejournal.com to download the SUBSCRIPTION FORM. Annual Subscription is from $80.
Laser Cladding
A Versatile Proactive and Reactive Technology
Laser cladding is an additive process wherein a laser source is used to melt metal-based powder or
wire on to a metal substrate. The result is a thick metal or metal matrix composite coating (order of 1
mm thickness) of a high quality: it has an excellent bonding to the substrate and is completely dense.
The laser cladding process enables the treatment of heat sensitive materials and deformation sensitive
components, which cannot be processed by conventional techniques like surface welding.
The technique is increasingly being used in industry as a pro-active technology for corrosion and wear
protection and as a reactive technology for repair of worn components. In both aspects, laser cladding
is a technology contributing to cost-effective maintenance.
Various research efforts are devoted to customised coating development with the aim to reduce
maintenance. This paper will discuss the advantages and limitations of laser cladding as a repair
and coating technique. The capabilities of the process will be illustrated by industrial case studies
performed by VITO.
INTRODUCTION
The functionality of components can often be ameliorated by
combining materials with optimised properties. The bulk material
can be chosen as a function of formability, strength, stiffness and
cost. The surface of this component can then be adapted to satisfy
demands in the field of friction, wear, and corrosion.
A possible process to optimise the surface of metal components
is laser cladding [1,2]. The process can also be used as a repair
technique. During laser cladding, additive material is supplied in the
form of wire or powder to the substrate to be treated. A laser beam
melts the additive material together with a thin surface layer of the
substrate resulting in a coating with a typical thickness of 0.5-1 mm
(Figure 1). Figure 1 Principle of laser cladding
In most cases powder is used as feedstock and transported in an argon gas flow. It is possible to use an
additional protective gas flow to minimise oxidation during laser cladding. Due to the superficial melting of the
substrate, a strong metallurgical bond is formed between substrate and coating. This is an important benefit
compared to thermal spraying where only a mechanical bond is formed between the coating and substrate.
Another advantage compared to thermal spraying is the higher powder yield, which is typical 75%.
Thanks to the low and local heat input, laser cladding is very well suited for the treatment of heat sensitive
materials and components, deformation is limited and the heat affected zone is small. Moreover, the high
cooling rate during laser treatment results in coatings with a fine microstructure. After deposition, machining of
the component to its final dimensions is mostly required.
As laser source, different types of lasers can be used: CO2, Nd:YAG, diode, disk or fiber laser. The former
two lasers are the most commonly used lasers in materials processing by laser welding and cutting. However,
there is currently a strong development in new, more compact and more efficient lasers including the diode,
disk and fiber lasers. The results presented in this paper are obtained using a diode laser as processing tool.
Laser cladding is a relatively new process, which is being used in industrial sectors like petrochemical,
aerospace, machine and die building, automotive, energy production, to: repair damaged high-value machine
components like turbine blades, shafts, motors, etc. improve the corrosion and/or wear resistance of metallic
components like tooling, pumps, valves, off-shore pipes, etc
The possibilities of laser cladding as a repair and surface treatment technology in energy production industry
is illustrated with two case studies carried out for the company Maintenance Partners. Maintenance Partners
is leader in the Benelux for the repair and revision of mechanical and electrical rotating machines. The case
studies presented in this paper are the repair of a compressor shaft, and the repair of turbine wheels.
EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
Figure 2 shows the experimental setup used for laser cladding in this study. It uses a 3 kW fiber-coupled
diode laser (Laserline), using specific optics to obtain a circular spot with a diameter of about 3,7 mm at the
substrate. A powder supply unit of Medicoat, which is commonly used for thermal spraying, is used. The
powder is supplied in an argon gas flow to the coaxial cladding head. A CCD camera, which looks through a
semi-transparent mirror coaxial with the laser beam, enables aligning of the cladding head to the area to be
treated.
Vol 24 No 1
info@infratherm.com.au
Ideally suited for a broad range of Condition Monitoring applications, the new
NEC-Avio G100 and G120 have been specifically developed for the practical and
professional thermographer alike.
• Full 320 x 240 UFPA detector for high definition thermal images.
• Unique panoramic thermal image capture.
• World's first vibration alarm function.
• Split Screen, Fusion or Alpha Blending of the images.
• On-board video capture at 10 FPS.
• Large colour LCD display with multi angle viewing.
• Full - 40°C to 500°C temperature range standard.
For more details speak to the region's leading thermal imaging suppliers, Infratherm,
on 61 (0)2 4579 7334, 61 (0)2 4322 2100 or email info@infratherm.com.au
AMMJ Laser Cladding 10
Vol 24 No 1
Tough Times Demand
Smart Solutions
Deliver real improvements in reliability and cost reductions with
EXP Enterprise; the world’s first asset health management system
Benefits:
UÊÊÊ1ÌÃiÃÊ>`Êi>LiÃÊÌ
iÊvÕÊ«ÜiÀÊvÊ-
Ê
>`Ê
,*Ê>Ìi>ViÊ>>}iiÌÊÃÞÃÌiÃÊ
VÕ`}Ê-*]Ê>Ý]Ê"À>Vi°
UÊÊÊ iÛiÀÃÊÌ
iÊ«ÀÃi`ÊLiiwÌÃÊvÊ>ÞÊ,
Ê
L>Ãi`Ê>Ìi>ViÊ>>}iiÌÊ«À}À>i°
UÊÊÊ ÃÊÃV>i>LiÊvÀÊ>Ê«iÀ>Ìð
UÊÊÊ>ÃÊ«ÀÛ`i`ÊÃÌÕ}ÊÀiÃÕÌÃÊÊ>ÊÜ`iÊÀ>}iÊvÊ
`ÕÃÌÀiÃÊVÕ`}Ê}]ÊiÀ>ÃÊ*ÀViÃÃ}]Ê
*ÜiÀ]Ê1ÌÌiÃ]Ê*>«iÀÊ>`Ê-Ìii°
MAKE IT HAPPEN!
Contact: Stuart Hylton
The Asset Partnership
Suite 1, Culdees Road
Burwood NSW 2136, Australia
AUS: T +61 (0)2 9715 1405 F +61 (0)2 9715 1043
NZ: T +64 (0) 9625 7167 M +64 (0) 21 466 283
E stuart.hylton@assetpartnership.com
AMMJ Laser Cladding 12
CONCLUSIONS
- The local repair of a compressor shaft of
martenstic stainless steel by laser cladding
proved to be successful thanks to the low
heat input of the laser process and high
quality of the resulting laser cladded coating
in terms of metallurgical bonding to the
substrate and high coating density.
- Damaged compressor wheels have been
repaired by laser cladding. The repair
process proved to be successful after spin
testing the wheels at 20.000 rpm in vacuum. Figure 7 Close-ups of compressor wheels after laser cladding
REFERENCES
[1] de Damborenea J., Surface modification of metals by
high power lasers, Surf. Coat. Technol. 100–101;1998.
p.377–382.
[2] Sexton C.L., Byrne G., Watkins K.G., Alloy
development by laser cladding: an overview, J. Laser
Appl. 13 (1); 2001 2–11.
Vol 24 No 1
Mobile/Cell: +61 (0) 402 731 563
Fax: +61 (8) 9457 8642
Email: info@lifetime-reliability.com
Website: www.lifetime-reliability.com
Reach new heights of production and maintenance performance
Applied Reliability
Mar 28 to 30 May 30 to
Engineering for Feb 14 to 16 Jun 1
Sep 12 to 14
Nov 28 to 29
Operating Plants
Brochure: http://www.lifetime-reliability.com/home_pdfs/Applied_Reliability_Engineering_Training_Australia.pdf
Follow the Brochure links to download the full training course details or visit the website.
Mine Loader Failure Prediction
“Intervene Immediately” after 10,000 trouble free hours
In a joint project with its Australian partner, FIRM Solutions Pty Ltd in 2010, OMDEC’s EXAKT failure prediction
analysis tool accurately identified a critical impending failure in a large front end loader for a mining giant.
Starting with an incomplete data set, the joint team successfully refined the data to the point where the failure
modeling produced a startling prediction: a 90% probability of failure in the main engine bearing within the next
500 operating hours in a unit that had no history of similar problems for 12,500 operating hours.
By analyzing multiple equipment conditions, EXAKT developed an easily measurable formula to accurately
predict whether any of the equipment was in danger of immediate failure. The answer was “Yes”.
Check mechanical
devices
Strategic Maintenance Reporting To
Enable Sustained Improvement
Jim Harper APMMS P/L Australia
This is the third in a series of articles based around a successful national Computerised Maintenance Management
System (CMMS) implementation. The first two articles dealt with application selection, change management and
lessons learnt on the journey.
• The Rise and Rise of Tier One ERP Maintenance Systems (AMMJ October 2007)
• Lessons from a Successful National CMMS Implementation (AMMJ July 2010)
This article discusses how strategic maintenance reporting can facilitate sustained improvement, leading to smarter
and more focussed maintenance and ultimately cost reduction.
Background
The challenge of any systems implementation firmly rests with the business after the implementation has finished.
The real challenge will be after the implementation team has left and the “novelty” factor of having a well structured
and usable tool has worn off. How is interest and focus maintained for the long haul?
Whilst the second article covered many areas that help system and process sustainability (such as maintenance
ownership, process reinforcement tools etc) this article will deal with strategic reporting and how it can positively
influence maintenance behaviour and lead to sustained improvement. It must be assumed that senior business
managers are committed to sustained improvement for, as stressed at length in previous articles, nothing will happen
without this leadership.
So how can strategic reporting drive these ongoing benefits?
What reports are needed and who should receive them?
agreed standards at the lowest achievable cost. Thus costs vs. budget and cost details will always be required.
The report set detailed costs in 3 ways:
• Rolling graphical trend report showing monthly expenditure vs. budget
• Monthly costs to cost centres & departments
• Monthly focus on high cost assets (Top 20 by spend)
Figures 1a and 1b show the monthly cost performance of a regional quarry business. The graphical rolling monthly
expenditure vs. budget is extremely easy to interpret and the same data is then presented at each site level.
Figure 1b
Maintenance Actuals and Budget Report - YTD Costs By Location
Vol 24 No 1
AMMJ Strategic Maintenance Reporting 18
• Work Management
In simple terms managers need to know if they are keeping up with their maintenance workload. So we present
graphical trend charts clearly showing the work order count and the amount of outstanding work orders (i.e. still in
an active status and not completed) monthly. This trend is presented for preventative maintenance (PM) work orders
as well, but as a rolling count of scheduled work not completed within 14 days. Adverse trends in workload and
completion rates are then easy to manage.
Figures 2a and 2b presents the PM workload of the same quarry business. The monthly PM outstanding work order
count is clear to see, with sub graphs presenting the data as a percentage of the total. Managers can easily see their
trends and direct attention where needed, with site specific data also presented.
Figure 2a Overdue PM Work Orders Management Report - Overdue PM’s (14 Days) by Location
Vol 24 No 1
AMMJ Strategic Maintenance Reporting 19
• Equipment Husbandry
Whatever maintenance regime is implemented a key driver in maintenance costs can be the “care factor” of the
equipment users. Using the old adage “nothing can be improved without first measuring” we presented a very clear
graphical trend report of monthly maintenance costs attributed to operator damage or neglect. Some businesses were
able to effectively target this area and achieve real savings by incorporating this metric into business unit KPI’s.
Figure 4 presents the monthly trend in maintenance costs attributed to operator damage. Again the results are shown
in drill down detail to each individual site.
• System Administration
Any CMMS needs to be well serviced (in terms of master data management, new assets etc) and the standard of data
entered monitored both for quality and timeliness. The report set presented system administration data in 3 areas, all
with rolling monthly trend graphs:
• Missing or late meter readings
• Costs attributed to cost centres instead of individual assets
• Amount of unreceipted purchasing monthly
Figure 5 shows the business trend in keeping up with the input of asset meter readings. Whilst the algorithm to
calculate the raw data presented some opportunity for debate, the intent here is more around trend patterns.
Vol 24 No 1
AMMJ Strategic Maintenance Reporting 20
Strategy Reinforcement
Whilst the strategy above serves an excellent base for measured improvement, the key to achieving real success
lies with all parties working towards the same goals. Much effort needs to be placed in ensuring that CMMS users
understand what data they are entering and managers at all levels need to fully aware of what they are managing!
This can be achieved in a number of ways:
• Process Training and Feedback
It is critical that standard processes are defined, taught and reinforced. Basic user training must cover these together
with strong reinforcement around data integrity. All users should understand the importance, for example, of defining
a work order as reactive and appreciate the importance of timely close out of work orders. On the same vein users
and workshops should receive feedback on their performance. The workshop communication board can be invaluable
here.
• Report Pack Explanation
A standard document should be developed that clearly outlines the reporting strategy. Each reporting area should
be explained, and an overview of the intent and data format of each report should be provided. With this simple
“handbook” all levels of management can be fully cognisant of their business reporting requirements.
• Senior Manager Training
Training sessions must be held to engage senior managers. They must understand the strategic significance of the
report pack and more importantly be able to understand trend variances and take necessary actions where needed.
As part of business sign off during this national project was the prerequisite that senior mangers attend a formal
session on the maintenance system/processes and reporting. Senior managers must be engaged.
Report Delivery
The report packs should be scheduled monthly (in this case on Day 6) to be automatically emailed to the recipients.
Most report systems have this facility and it is important to remove the need for manual running.
Figure 4 Work Order Classification Trend Management Report (Costs of damage i.e. by operators)
Vol 24 No 1
AMMJ Strategic Maintenance Reporting 21
Whilst the core content was not varied the reporting content was set up to be dependent on the recipient’s management
level. This ensured that all reporting communication was targeting the same content, the same KPI’s and ultimately the
same goal. It should be not uncommon for a “red circled” report to be emailed down the line to seek explanation!
Examples of these reporting levels are explained below:
• Regional Manager – to receive a report pack reporting regional KPI trends, then drilling down to businesses
• Business Manager - to receive a report pack reporting business KPI trends, then drilling down to sites
• Site Manager - to receive a report pack reporting site KPI trends, then drilling down to departments
Examples of this data “levelling” can be seen in the report examples presented.
Benefits
• The amount of effort put into the reporting focus can reap large and sustained benefits. With a common
set of reports targeted to all levels of business (from regional managers to workshop supervisors) the
advantage in having “one language” to trend and debate maintenance is realised.
• Strengths vs. weaknesses are easily identified, with managers easily able to drill down within their
responsibility scope. This enables true national (even international) benchmarking.
• Tangible results are presented which can be discussed at management meetings.
• Outcomes from initiatives can easily be trended.
• Report outcomes can be linked to job performance management.
• A successful reporting strategy can lead to sustained improvement.
If you would like a full “report pack” together with detailed comments and example reports (in pdf format) please email
Jim at the address below. APMMS (Asset & Process Maintenance Management Solutions) has offices in Sydney and
Newcastle, and provides services in process, maintenance and inventory management. See www.apmms.com.au or
contact Jim Harper (Director/Principal) at jimapmms@primusonline.com.au.
Figure 5 Missing and Late Meter Reading Score Management Report (Bar) by Location
Vol 24 No 1
What’s The FRACAS
Failure Elimination Made Simple
Ricky Smith and Bill Keeter Allied Reliability (USA)
“Your system is perfectly designed to give you the results that you get.”
W. Edwards Deming PhD
How good is your organization at identifying failures? Of course you see failures when they occur, but
can you identify when recurring failures are creating serious equipment reliability issues? Most companies
begin applying RCA or RCFA to “high value failures”. While this is not wrong, I prefer to either not see the
failure in the first place, or at the least, to reduce the failures to a controllable level.
Failure Reporting Analysis and Corrective Action System (FRACAS) is an excellent process that can be used to
control or eliminate failures. This is a process in which you identify any reports from your CMMS/EAM or a specialized
Reliability Software that can help you to eliminate, mitigate or control failures. These reports could include cost
variance, Mean Time Between Failure, Mean Time Between Repair, dominant failure patterns in your operation,
common threads between failures such as “lack of lubrication” (perhaps due to lubricator not using known industry
standards). One poll was conducted recently covering 80 large companies. Shockingly, none of these companies
were capturing the data required to understand and control equipment failures.
Answer the following questions honestly before you go any further to see if you have any problems with identifying
failures and effectively eliminating or mitigating their effects on total process and asset reliability.
1. Can you identify the top 10 assets which had the most losses due to a partial or total functional
failure by running a report on your maintenance software?
2. Can you identify the total losses in your organization and separate them into process and asset
losses for the past 365 days?
3. Can you identify components with a common thread due to a specific
failure pattern, such as theone shown oposite?
Many times, the cost of unreliability remains unknown because the causes of unreliability are so many. Whether you
want to point the finger at maintenance, production (operations) or engineering, each functional area plays a role in
unreliability. Here are a few examples of those losses:
1. Equipment Breakdown (total functional failure)
Causes of Equipment Breakdown
• No Repeatable Effective Repair, Preventive Maintenance, Lubrication, or Predictive MaintenanceProcedures
• No one following effective procedures
2. Equipment not running to rate (partial functional failure)
Causes of Equipment not Running to Rate
• Operator not having an effective procedure to follow
• Operator not trained to operate or roubleshoot equipment
• Management thinking this is the best rate at which the equipment can operate because of age or condition
3. Off-Quality Product that is identified as “first pass quality” (could be a partial or total functional failure)
Causes of Quality Issues
• Acceptance by management that “first pass quality” is not a loss because the product can be recycled
4. Premature Equipment Breakdown
• Ineffective or no commissioning procedures. We are talking about maintenance replacement of parts or
equipment that fails prematurely because no one has identified if a defect is present after the
equipment has been installed, repaired, serviced, etc. If you have ever seen equipment break down or not
running to rate immediately after a shutdown, you know what we are talking about.
The Proactive Workflow Model - Eliminating unreliability is a continuous improvement process much like the
Proactive Work Flow Model in Figure 1. The Proactive Workflow Model illustrates the steps required in order to move
from a reactive to a proactive maintenance program.
What the Proactive Work Flow Model really means to your organization - Implementing the Proactive Work Flow
Model is the key to eliminating failures. The built-in continuous improvement processes of Job Plan Improvement
and the Failure Reporting, Analysis, and Corrective Action System (FRACAS) help ensure that maintainability and
reliability are always improving. All of the steps and processes have to be implemented in a well managed and
controlled fashion to get full value out of the model.
The foundational elements of Asset Health Assurance are keys because they ensure that all of the organization’s
assets are covered by a complete and correct Equipment Maintenance Plan (EM). These are requirements (not
options) to ensure that you have a sustainable proactive workflow model.
Vol 24 No 1
What’s The FRACAS 23
You cannot have continuous improvement until you have a repeatable, disciplined process.
The objective of the Proactive Work Flow Model is to provide discipline and repeatability to your maintenance
process. The inclusion of the FRACAS provides continuous improvement for your maintenance strategies. There are
fundamental items you must have in place to insure that you receive the results you expect.
Think of FRACAS this way. As you have failures, you use your CMMS/EAMS failure codes to record the part-defect-
cause of each failure. Analyzing part-defect-cause on critical assets helps you begin to make serious improvement
in your operation’s reliability. Looking at the FRACAS Model in Figure 2, we begin with Work Order History Analysis,
and from this analysis we decide whether we need to apply Root Cause Analysis (RCA), Reliability Centered
Maintenance, or Failure Modes and Effect Analysis to eliminate or reduce the failures we discover. From the RCA, we
determine maintenance strategy adjustments needed to predict or prevent failures. Even the most thorough analysis
doesn’t uncover every failure mode. Performance monitoring after we make the strategy adjustments may find that
Registration/Information
Anna Civiti
Tel:+ 61 (0) 3 9697 1103 / anna.civiti@sirfrt.com.au
www.sirfrt.com.au
5th and 6th April 2011 Practitioner Companies
new failure modes not covered by your strategy occur. You can now make a new failure code to track the new failure
mode so additional failures can be tracked and managed when you review work order history. You can see this is a
continuous improvement loop which never ends.
Vol 24 No 1
AMMJ 25
Figure 5 “4 Way Prioritisation Model”
Equipment
PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE
The only
Complete System
for motor diagnostics
Online and Offline
9 EASY & SAFE MOTOR TESTING – fast, accurate and non destructive
9 PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE – early detection and time to failure estimates
9 STATOR FAULTS – turn, coil, phase, ground and connection faults
9 ROTOR FAULTS – casting void, mechanical and rotor bar faults
9 POWER QUALITY – transformer, VSD, harmonics and cable fault detection
Power Transformers & HV Cables deteriorate 9 POWERFUL SOFTWARE – trending, analysing, writing reports and work orders
with age and excessive stress, and can fail 9 ASSET MANAGEMENT – motor database and energy efficiency calculations
without warning at enormous cost. 9 COST EFFECTIVE – optimise motor availability and production
Our services will provide fingerprinting, 9 QUALITY ASSURANCE – motor faults quantified and repairs assured
trending, grading of the worst offenders and 9 LOCAL SUPPORT – training and technical backup
accurately pinpoint likely failure. 9 GREAT DEALS TO BUY OR LEASE
Risk Management
For more information go to www.aptgroup.com.au or call 1300 700 002 Part of the apt Group
AMMJ What’s The FRACAS 26
Using the Intercept line which is struck down the middle, a planner or scheduler can define which job should be
planned or scheduled first, or at least get close to the best answer, because management has already been involved
in determining the most critical asset and the equipment has told you (on the “X” axis) which one has the highest
defect severity (in the worst condition).
The only other two factors I would add in determining which job to plan or schedule would be based on work order
type (PM, CM, CBM, Rebuild, etc) plus time on back. Figure 5 shows the 4-Way Prioritization Model for planning and
scheduling.
Identify what equipment is most likely to negatively impact business performance because it both matters a lot when
it fails and it fails too often. The resulting Relative Risk Number is used to identify assets that are candidates for
reliability improvement. A consistent definition for equipment criticality needs to be adopted and validated in order to
ensure the right work is completed at the right time. This is the key to the elimination of failures.
Identification of Failure Modes
The goal of most maintenance strategies is to prevent or predict equipment failures. Equipment failures are typically
caused by the catastrophic failure of an individual part. These parts develop defects, and when left alone, those
defects lead to the ultimate catastrophic failure of the part. The defects are, in turn, caused by “something”. Eliminating
that “something” (the cause) will eliminate the failure.
The primary goal of an effective Preventive (PM) program is to eliminate the cause and prevent the failure from
occurring. The primary goal of a Predictive Maintenance (PdM) or Condition Based Monitoring (CBM) Program is to
detect the defects and manage the potential failures before they become catastrophic failures.
In addition, many program tasks are designed to maintain regulatory compliance. Many companies have PM
programs. However, many of the tasks in them do not address specific failure modes. For example: An electric motor
with roller bearings has specific failure modes which can be prevented with lubrication. The failure mode is “wear”
caused by “Inadequate Lubrication”. The next question may be why you had Inadequate Lubrication. The Inadequate
Lubrication could be identified as a result of no lubrication standard being established for bearings. In other words
someone gives the bearing “x” shots of grease even though no one knows the exact amount to prevent the bearing
from failure.
The best way to identify failure modes is to use a facilitated process. Put together a small team consisting of people
knowledgeable about the equipment, train them thoroughly on the concept of part-defect-cause, and go through the
basic equipment types in your facility such as centrifugal pumps, piston pumps, gearboxes, motors, etc.. You will
find that a relatively small number of failure codes will cover a lot of failure modes in your facility. The failure modes
developed during this exercise can later become the basis for the failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis
that takes place during Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) projects. In our book, we focus on failure mode
identification as an output of FRACAS (Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System), which, again, is a
strong continuous improvement process.
If, over a period of one year, the dominant failure mode is “wear” for bearings caused by Inadequate Lubrication then
one can change or develop a standard, provide training and thus eliminate a large amount of failures.
The problem is that most companies do not have the data to identify a major problem on multiple assets (No data in
equals no effective failure reports out). For example, it isn’t the motor that fails; the motor fails because of a specific
part’s failure mode, which then results in catastrophic damage to the motor. Unless, of course, the defect is identified
early enough in the failure mode.
Maintenance Strategy
The maintenance strategy should be a result from either a Failure Modes and Effect Analysis, Reliability Centered
Maintenance or from failure data collected from your CMMS/EAM.
Elimination Strategy: The best way to eradicate this deadly waste is get a better understanding of the true
nature of the equipment’s failure patterns and adjust the Maintenance Strategy to matc - Andy Page
So what is a maintenance strategy? Let’s break down the two words: Maintenance is to keep in an existing condition,
or to keep, preserve, protect, while Strategy is development of a prescriptive plan toward a specific goal.
So, a Maintenance Strategy is a prescriptive plan to keep, preserve, or protect an asset or assets. Keep in mind that
one specific type of maintenance strategy is “run to failure” (RTF). However, RTF is used only if, based on thorough
analysis, it is identified as the best solution for specific equipment to optimize reliability at optimal cost. Less invasive
maintenance is preferred to more invasive maintenance.
This is one of the fundamental concepts of any well-defined maintenance strategy. Specific maintenance strategies
are designed to mitigate the consequences of each failure mode. As a result, maintenance is viewed as a reliability
function instead of a repair function. Saying this means Predictive Maintenance or Condition Monitoring is the best
solution because it is mainly noninvasive.
Knowing that both systemic problems and operating envelope problems produce the same type of defects, a
maintenance strategy that merely attempts to discover the defects and correct them will never be able to reach a
proactive state. Technicians will be too busy fixing the symptoms of problems instead of addressing the root cause.
To reach a truly proactive state, the root cause of the defects will need to be identified and eliminated. Maintenance
Vol 24 No 1
AMMJ What’s The FRACAS 27
strategies that accomplish this are able to achieve a step change in performance and achieve incredible cost savings.
Maintenance strategies that do not attempt to address the root cause of defects will continue to see lackluster
results and struggle with financial performance.
A Maintenance Strategy involves all elements that aim the prescriptive plan toward a common goal. Key parts of a
maintenance strategy include Preventive and Predictive Maintenance based on a solid Failure Mode Elimination
Strategy, Maintenance Planning consisting of repeatable procedures, work scheduled based on equipment criticality,
work executed using precision techniques, proper commissioning of equipment when a new part or equipment is
installed, and quality control using Predictive Maintenance Technologies to ensure no defects are present after
this event occurs. The very last part of your maintenance strategy is FRACAS, because it drives the continuous
improvement portion of this strategy.
Failure Reporting
Failure reporting can come in many forms. The key is to have a disciplined plan to review failure reports over a
specific time period, and then to develop actions to eliminate failure. Following are a few Failure Report examples,
which should be included as part of your FRACAS Continuous Improvement and Defect Elimination Process.
Asset Health or Percent of Assets with No Identifiable Defect
Reported by maintenance management to plant and production management on a monthly basis at least (see Figure
6). An asset that has an identifiable defect is said to be in a condition RED. An asset that does not have an identifiable
defect is said to be in condition GREEN. That is it. It is that simple.
There are no other “but ifs”, “what ifs” or “if then”. If there is an identifiable defect the asset is in condition RED. If there
is no identifiable defect, it is GREEN. The percentage of machines that are in condition GREEN is the Asset Health
(as a percentage) for that plant or area. The definition for defect is: an abnormality in a part which leads to equipment
or asset failure if not corrected in time.
Example: the plant has 1,000 pieces of equipment. Of that number, 750 of them have no identifiable defects. The
plant is said to have 75% Asset Health. There is an interesting aspect about Asset Health. Once this change is
underway, Asset Health, as a metric, becomes what most maintenance managers and plant managers have wanted
for a long time — a leading indicator of maintenance costs and business risk.
Mean Time Between Failures and Mean Time Between Repairs
Reported by maintenance or reliability engineers on a monthly basis on the top 5-20% of critical equipment. The report
to management should include recommendations to improve both metrics and should be measured and posted on a
line graph for all to see.
Cost Variance by area of the plant
Reported by maintenance and production supervisor area of responsibility. Cost variance must be reported to
maintenance and production management on a monthly basis. The report should not be acceptable without a known
cause of the variance and a plan to bring it in compliance.
Most Frequent Part-Defect-Cause Report
Reported monthly by maintenance or reliability engineers. If you do not have maintenance or reliability engineers, you
may need to appoint a couple of your best maintenance technicians as “Reliability Engineering” Technicians, even if
unofficially, and train them to be a key player in this failure elimination process. This one report can identify common
failure threads within your operation which, when resolved, can make a quick impact to failure elimination.
There are many more reports that can be used effectively, but will not fit in the space of this article. You will be able
to find more reports in the book on “FRACAS” written by Ricky and Bill.
Bill Keeter (email at bkeeter@gpallied.com) and Ricky Smith (email at rsmith@gpallied.com) are currently Senior
Technical Advisors with Allied Reliability.
This article was first published in the June/July issue of Uptime Magazine. www.uptimemagazine.com
Vol 24 No 1
MAINTENANCE and RELIABILITY WEB LINKS
Compiled by Len Bradshaw (2011)
Assetivity www.assetivity.com.au
A hybrid management and engineering consulting organisation, focused on improving Asset Management and Maintenance performance for
organisations in the Mining and Mineral Processing, Oil & Gas, Utilities, Power Generation, Defense and Heavy Manufacturing sectors.
ATTAR www.attar.com.au
ATTAR provides leading practice Engineering Training & Consulting services! Established in 1985 ATTAR offers a variety of consulting services
including Metallurgical services, Acoustic Emission Testing, Slip Resistance Testing, Failure Analysis, Expert Witness and other tailored services.
BEIMS www.beims.com
BEIMS Facilities Management software can assist with facilities management in organisations of all sizes. BEIMS is a powerful solution for:
Planned/Ad Hoc Maintenance; Asset Management; Contractor Management; PDA Solutions; Web Requests; Condition Assessment; Visitor
Registration; Materials Management; Reporting; Essential Services.
Vol 24 No 1
AMMJ Maintenance and Reliability Web Links 29
IDCON www.idcon.com
IDCON’s mission is “To help our clients improve overall reliability and lower manufacturing and maintenance costs”. Our strengths are for example;
maintenance assessments, leadership and organization, planning and scheduling, preventive maintenance, condition monitoring, Root Cause
Analysis, and maintenance store room management.
Oniqua www.oniqua.com
The Oniqua Analytics Suite software solution provides a platform for continuous improvement of reliability, maintenance, inventory and procurement
activities across the Enterprise helping them to save millions of dollars in improved asset performance. Our services arm, Oniqua Content
Services, provides outsourced master data standardization and optimization services throughout the World.
Vol 24 No 1
AMMJ Maintenance and Reliability Web Links 33
The
Manufacturing Game R
RCA Rt facilitators are expert www.rcart.com.au +61 3 9697 1100 Copyright Want to play the game?
incident investigators available to lead your team onsite contact: melissa@sirfrt.com.a
Maintenance efforts need to be directed where it will matter most and the results should be measurable for
determination of success or failure. A systematic approach following Deming’s Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle to
identify short term immediate strategies to improve the Mill Availability at Ok Tedi Mine and put into place long
term strategies to sustain this uptime has been customized from the Mill Downtime Tracking Database.
A facility for drilling down to the dominant equipment failure causes is established. This now means that
rather than focusing on all the equipment the ‘significant few’ affecting Mill Availability can now be quickly
identified and their effects quantified using three key performance indicators: cost, frequency and downtime
duration. Viable solutions and improvement ideas can now be identified and focused at the dominant cause
of plant equipment failure. The drill down facilitation also enables quick justifications and easy tracking of
implemented solutions.
INTRODUCTION
The Mill comprises of two SAG Mills each having two Balls Mills in its circuit. The Mill Downtime Tracking Database
(MDTDB) is used for logging the downtime events of these two SAG Mills and their respective Ball Mills. In total
six mills’ downtime events are logged and tracked. The focus, however, will be on the two SAG Mills and the plant
equipment that have cost their uptime.
The MDTDB Analysis aim was to identify short term immediate strategies to improve the Mill Uptime and put into
place long term strategies to sustain it. The aim was also to provide a facility to drill down into the ‘significant few’
plant equipment rather than focusing on all the equipment. Viable solutions or corrective actions will be identified
for the dominant causes of each plant equipment breakdown which has cost Ok Tedi Mining Limited (OTML) in Mill
Availability. The data extracted for analysis was that logged over 18 months from July 2006 to December 2007.
Figure 1 The MDTDB record fields showing the type of data logged.
Vol 24 No 1
AMMJ Mill Downtime Tracking 35
B. Top 10 by Frequency of
Figure 2 Equipment Contributing To SAG1 Mill Downtime Revenue Loss.
Occurrences
Equipment Contributing To SAG1 Mill Downtime Revenue Loss: Last 18 Months_Jul06-Dec07
The graph in Figure 3 is a
comparison between the number 160 $12,000,000
by frequency of occurrence is
80 $6,000,000
Besides also ranking the
equipment from having the 60
$4,000,000
highest frequency of occurrence $3,893,808
$3,370,636
40
to the lowest this comparison
highlights another important 20
$1,825,106
$1,385,131
$2,000,000
C 2
31 0
7
31 1
ot n
C 2
03 2 3 0 5
31 01
31 6
31 07
H 3
M 3
02 PP 4
31 1
/T 1
U C10
H 5
H A
TP 2 3 1 B
31 4 A
41 A
02 FS 1B
02 31M 01
42 02
M 2
02 ML A
31 A
3 a
its average hours a different
-0
02 1 -1
Fl o w
02 P0
31 0
31 -0
O V0
31 0
02 L0
IP V0
02 LC1
M P0
31 0
02 io n
S 03
02 en g
S 01
02 AR
31 0 6
03 01
02 L
02 CP
02 1CV
02 CV
02 MA
03 1FE
02 PS
02 V0
0 0
31 02
02 01
01
M
M
12 L2
C
C
S/ 1C
42 1P
S
50 L
n
V
0
at
nk
P
31
U
3
C
G
G
C
k
02
0
Top 10 ranking from Table 2 is
presented. Equipment
Hours
Equipment No. of Incident No. of Hours Equipment Causing SAG1 Mill Downtime: Last 18 Months_Jul06-Dec07
(Avg.)
0231ML01 38 3.56 40 8.00
0231SC10 24 1.01
35 7.00
0231CV01 15 3.46
Unknown 11 1.68 30 6.00
0231CV03 10 0.56
0231CV04 9 0.39
20 4.00
TPS/Ok Menga 7 0.59
IPC/TARA 6 7.50 15 3.00
0231FE02 5 1.25
10 2.00
0231ML01B 5 1.13
5 1.00
41 0
07
31 11
31 n
31 5
Fl P07
CH 0 3
31 01
31 1
31 0
Un 01
TP 2 3 03
M 4
CV 2
FS 06
31 3 5
SG 01 A
31 B
31 A
H B
02 31M 01
02 1M 02
31 02
03 2 3 6A
02 ARA
31 ns
a
02 o w
02 L0
02 C1
V0
03 C1
02 P0
IP n g
SG 2 1
02 01
02 01
02 04
1-
02 01 -
L
P
CV
CV
02 CV
02 MA
02 L20
S
02 FE
02 atio
03 01
M
M
C
S/ 1C
02 31C
PL
P
42 1P
S
kn
L
e
12 L0
CV
PP
02 UP
H0
M
31
31
ot
C
31
k
02
02
M
O
31
0
0
50
Willmoth and McCathy [2] reiterated in the six losses of Total Productive Maintenance.
1. Equipment failure (short-term, immediate effect),
2. Set up and adjustment losses (from product change over),
3. Idling or short stops from abnormal operations (long-term cumulative effect),
4. Operation below design capacity (long-term cumulative effect),
5. Process defects (rejects, quality defects, reject scraps) and
6. Reduce yield.
Apart from the obvious ones in the graph in Figure 3 and Table 3, production losses brought about by chronic
recurring failures, which often tend to have long term cumulative effects, is a definite cause for concern.
Traditionally Root Cause Failure Analysis is carried out for ‘show stoppers’. That is, major one-of events causing a
lot of downtime hours. This focus has now also shift to addressing recurring chronic failures. Can you identify these
from the graph in Figure 3?
Chronic equipment breakdowns are frequently occurring, low impact events that demand attention but take little time
to restore the equipment to service. They almost never had a financial figure calculated for the total loss. However,
over the life of a system/equipment the total losses from chronic failures will far exceed the total losses from sporadic
failures.
Vol 24 No 1
AMMJ Mill Downtime Tracking 37
The undetected recurring problems exhibit the pattern similar to that on the left side of the graph in Figure 3. These
are characterized by high occurrences and shorter downtime.
One-off critical breakdowns normally exhibit the pattern similar to that on the right of the graph in Figure 3 which is
characterized by low occurrence and longer downtime.
0231SC10 14%
20
0231CV01 9%
9%
Unkown 6% 15
0231CV03 6% 6%
6%
5%
0231CV04 5% 10
4%
4%
TPS/Ok Menga 4% 3% 3%
5 2% 2% 2%
2% 2% 2% 2%
IPC/TARA 4% 1% 1% 1% 1%
1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
0231FE02 3% 0
0231ML01B 3% L0
1 10 01 wn V03 V04 n ga RA E02 01 B V02 01 A P06 03 5 04 A P0 5 P07 io ns 0 6A P0 3 1-0 S02 2 1B
2
1-
11 10 01 01 01 A
1-
07
SC CV no e TA L L2 CV t LC 1ML MA L
M C C
31 2 31 2 31 Un k 2 31 2 31 k M C / 2 31
F
M 31
C
CV 31
C 1P 1C ta 1PP 31P H 0 2UP ML0 H0 1P 1 M H0
0231CV02 2% 02 0 0 0 0 O IP 0 31 02 2 31 02 1FS 31 02 3 02 3 Flo 3 02 M
C 4 1 S G
2 3 034 23 31 SG
/ 2 3 2 2 3 3 2 0 2
S 0 0
02
0 0 42 0 02 2 1
0 0 50
TP 03 0 02
0231CV01A 2% Equipment
80%
Pareto’s analysis is centered on the 80/20 rule. That is, 80% of the problem (whatever it may be) is caused by 20% of
the cause (whatever they may be). Table 4 gives the 20% of equipment causing 80% of the breakdown incidents.
120
TABLE 5 EQUIPMENT CAUSING 80% OF
No. Of Hours (Cumulative)
0231CV01 16% 7%
6%
20
IPC/TARA 13% 3% 2% 2%
2% 2% 1% 1%
1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0%
0
0231SC10 7%
Fl own
31 A
31 s
C/ 1
42 02
CH 03
31 1
Un 10
M 3
31 04
31 02
31 1
31 6
31 7
02 31M 01
03 23 05
A
41 A
H0 A
31 02
TP 231 B
31 4A
31 0
02 FS 1B
H0 5
31 a
31 1
31 02
07
02 tion
02 L0
IP V0
02 L0
02 P0
02 P0
02 C1
02 R
SG 03
31 06
1
03 01
SG 01
02 eng
02 1-1
Unknown 6%
03 FE
02 MA
SC
S/ CV
02 CV
02 CV
PP
02 PS
L0
02 V0
02 01-
31 02
1-
TA
M
M
C
C
42 1P
C
12 L2
kn
02 PP
CV
L
PL
a
02 ML
U
C
31
ot
k
02
0
M
0
50
83%
Equipment
Vol 24 No 1
AMMJ Mill Downtime Tracking 38
A similar analysis as carried out for SAG1 Mill was repeated for SAG2 Mill. The graphs and tables are presented in
this section.
A. Top 10 by Cumulative Breakdown Hours and the Equivalent in Cost of Production Loss
The graph in Figure 6 is a Figure 6 Equipment Contributing To SAG2 Mill Downtime Revenue Loss.
comparison between the cumulative
hours and the equivalent in cost of
Equipment Contributing To SAG2 Mill Downtime Revenue Loss: Last 18 Months_Jul06-Dec07
loss production in the 18 months
from July 2006 to December 2007. 250 $18,000,000
$16,000,000
TABLE 6 SAG2 MILL TOP 10 EQUIPMENT $15,565,490
200
BY DOWNTIME DURATION $14,000,000
03 3 41 4 -2
L4 1
L 2
03 L0 8
L 1
CV 2
41 n
03 L0 4
03 PP 3
C 01
41 0 1
03 UP 3
TP 41 1 5D
41 01
41 01
03 1P 1
1
A
03 41 A
02 Ok 01 A
03 41 01 B
03 L0 3 A
02 41 1 1A
41 01
M 2
03 GH 2A
A
Un RA
03 H0 a
FS 4 -
M 1
FS -1
03 no w
M 0
FS L0
41 L0
03 CV0
42 V0
FS D-
41 P0
41 S0
4 2
03 09
SG n g
01
03 L01
41 1
41 1 -
IP SC
03 ML
41 CV
03 PP
03 CV
03 41
03 FE
M 0
S 0
0
0 42
41 L42
41 01
A
41 1 5
41 M
03 1M
03 1C
S/ SC
12 Me
03 ML
41 ML
12 PP
/T
k
41
4
03
03
The equipment contributing to Equipment
Figure 7?
60 6.00
0341PP01 19 0.68
10 1.00
0341CV02 17 0.73
Unknown 13 1.02 0 0.00
L0 -1
-2
U 2
41 1
M 18
41 n
P 3
L4 4
CV 2
41 1
41 1
41 1
Un V02
03 41C 1
TP M 03
M D
02 FS 9 1
03 H0 1
03 SL A
41 1 B
A
03 FS 1 A
02 41 1A
03 1S 2
41 1
H0 A
41 1A
03 1M A
03 3 41 ga
0341SC01 11 2.97
03 1 -1
03 o w
03 L0
41 L0
03 L0
03 V0
03 C0
FS 0
42 D-
41 0
03 FE0
03 P0
SG 12
O 15
SG 0 2
03 L03
01
IP 24
M 24
41 1 -
41 V
41 CV
03 1PP
41 40
03 PS
0 en
41 L0
41 C0
03 ML0
03 L01
03 P0
03 /TA
03 1 5
03 1M
M
12 L4
C
C
P
S
kn
S/ L0
12 PP
41 L4
M
41
4
C
F
k
03
0341CV03 9 1.20
0341ML015D 9 0.47 Equipment
The undetected recurring problems exhibit the pattern similar to that on the left side of the graph in Figure 7. These
are characterized by high occurrences and shorter downtime.
One-off critical breakdowns normally exhibit the pattern similar to that on the right of the graph in Figure 7 which is
characterized by low occurrence and longer downtime.
The Top 10 equipment by frequency of occurrence is given in Table 7.
Vol 24 No 1
AMMJ Mill Downtime Tracking 39
0341CV01 14% 30
0341FE01 8% 8%
8%
20 7%
0341PP01 8% 5%
4%
0341CV02 7% 10
4% 4%
2% 2%
2% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Unknown 5% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0
0341SC01 4%
1
2
42 D- 2
41 1
41 n
D
41 1
41 1
41 1
Un 02
FS 04
41 2
41 03
41 0 2
02 FS 9 1
1
03 FSL A
FS 1 A
41 1 B
41 A
A
02 41P A
02
41 1
RA
SG 2A
41 1A
03 41 a
M 24 -
IP 24 -
41 1 -1
03 1 -1
03 o w
03 L0
03 L0
03 V0
03 C0
41 V0
03 E0
03 P0
SG 12
g
11
O 15
03 03
01
03 ML
CV
41 CV
03 PP
41 40
03 PS
en
41 L0
03 L0
12 P0
03 P0
03 TA
03 1 5
M
M
12 L4
C
03 1C
P
03 1SC
kn
L
0
0
F
CV
L4
03 H0
H0
0341CV03 4%
L
L
03 1M
M
41
P
L0
/
M
TP M
4
C
k
03
03
4
41
03
41
S/
03
0341ML015D 4%
Equipment
82%
This is the same information as Figure 9 Equipment Breakdown Hours Causing SAG2 Mill Downtime.
provide by the graph in Figure 6 but
now we are using Pareto analysis Equipment B/Down Hours Causing SAG2 Mill Downtime: Last 18 Months_Jul06-Dec07
breakdown hours.
29%
No. Of Hours (Cumulative)
FS 4 -1
FS - 2
8
FS -11
41 n
TP 41S D
03 SL4 2
41 03
41 0 2
41 1
41 1
41 1
41 2
42 03
41 1
03 41M B
M 03 A
A
A
02 k M A
02 41P A
41 02
41 1
41 1A
Un RA
03 GH A
a
41 1 -1
w
03 V0
41 V0
0
03 V0
03 L0
IP C0
03 E0
03 P0
03 09
03 412
SG n g
5
01
03 01
S 02
03 24
41 5D
0341SC01 6%
41 ML
03 1ML
03 PP
03 CV
03 PS
o
03 L0
C0
03 01
03 L01
03 P0
2
41 01
A
M
L4
C
03 1C
S
P
kn
L
F
CV
L4
0
/T
03 01
L
L
M
M
41
H
U
P
M
4
4
C
L
03
03
F
O
41
41
12
12
80%
S/
03
Equipment
This analysis provided some visibility to what has been costing OTML in Mill Availability in the last 18 months and
provided a facility for easy drill down to the ‘significant few’ plant equipment and their dominant breakdown causes.
Figure 10 is an example of this drill down facilitation.
Pivot tables from MS Excel were used to a large extent to achieve this easy drill downs. Also the pivot tables in MS
Excel were used for registering and tracking our action plans.
These drill down and tracking facilities were presented in [3] for SAG1 Mill and SAG2 Mill respectively.
Vol 24 No 1
AMMJ Mill Downtime Tracking 40
Figure 10 This is an example of the drill down facilitation created from MS Excel
Pivot Tables and shows further drill down for information provided in Figure 2.
COMMUNICATE FINDINGS TO
MANAGEMENT
As a summary of the findings of this
analysis the Top 10 equipment of both
SAG Mills are listed in Table 10. These
equipment have appeared in both the
20% of equipment in the downtime
incidents lists and downtime hours lists
(That is, Table 2 and Table 5 for SAG1
and for SAG2 that is Table 6 and Table 9
respectively).
These results from the MDTDB analysis were communicated to maintenance management by way of a presentation
similar to [3]. This also included some of our strategies to address some of the equipment breakdown root causes.
Vol 24 No 1
AMMJ Mill Downtime Tracking 41
The plan was to hold mini shop floor sessions of the same presentation as given SAG1 Mill SAG2 Mill
to management and highlight the dominant breakdown causes of equipment to 0231ML01 0341ML01
the work teams responsible for maintaining these problem equipments. The
0231SC10 0341CV01
intent was also to seek what solutions they thing should solve the problem or
how they think these problems should be addressed. 0231CV01 0341FE01
By rolling this down to the shop floor teams we hope to be bipartisan in our Unknown 0341PP01
approach and develop cooperative solutions to our problems. The aim is to get
0231CV03 0341CV02
the shop floor personnel to buy into our initiative as it gives them a sense of
ownership and value in their job. 0231CV04 Unknown
This step, pooling together of solutions, was a challenging one especially TPS/Ok Menga 0341SC01
with the concern plant personnel reverting to the ‘fire fighting’ mode. In such
IPC/TARA 0341CV03
a reactive situation it was a struggle to book a time to have all of the shop floor
personnel present and often the sessions were deferred. As a way forward and 0231FE02 0341ML015D
instead of holding a group session the author have resorted to booking a time 0231ML01B TPS/Ok Menga
with those key personnel (i.e. leading hands and team coordinators) to pool
together their ideas.
CONCLUSION
From this paper and as presented during the residential school, this analysis of the MDTDB has:
• Identified plant equipment costing OTML in Mill Availability,
• Quantified the performance indicators in Cost, Frequency and Downtime Duration,
• Drilled down to the Dominant Causes,
• Pooled together some Solutions to address the dominant issues,
• Implemented and tracked some viable solutions,
• Determined after six months the wins of a particular solution
Overall, a systematic approach to follow the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle is now customized from the MDTDB
for continuous improvement and sustaining of the Mill Uptime at Ok Tedi.
REFERENCES
[1] Latino Robert J and Latino Kenneth C, Root Cause Analysis: Improving Performance for
Bottom-Line Results. 2nd Edition, CRC Press LLC, Florida, USA.
[2] P. Willmoth, and D. McCarthy, TPM – A Route to World-Class Performance. Butterworth-Heinemann,
Great Britain, 2001.
[3] G. Hamambi, “Mill Downtime Tracking Database Analysis” Presentation at AMCON, Monash Residential
School, Gippsland Campus, September 2008.
Vol 24 No 1
Maintenance News
Honda engine factory in China benefits from SKF on-line so Chen had 3 TMU’s installed on 3 different machining centres.
machine monitoring Success was almost instant with one TMU detecting a condition
later diagnosed as poor lubrication and immediately rectified, and
Sales of Honda cars in China increased by over 50% year on a second TMU detecting a bearing defect that could be allowed
year during 2009. And with another joint venture factory being to continue until an optimum time for replacing at a scheduled
built in 2010 the company is very optimistic about delivering machine maintenance stop.
more of their fashionable and high quality cars to the Chinese
A further 19 TMUs have since been installed at the Guangzhou
market.
engine plant and 3 more have been ordered for the Honda plant
Contributing to this success are the modern and reliable engines in Wuhan. Commenting on this Chen says; “I have been very
manufactured by Dongfeng Honda, a joint venture factory located satisfied with the performance of the TMU and its ease of use
right next to the Honda car assembly plant, in Guangzhou. by our maintenance personnel. And I am also very impressed
Equipped with advanced manufacturing machinery the engine with the professionalism of SKF’s engineers who gave fast and
factory produces engines in the range 1.3 to 2.4 litres for Honda knowledgeable support whenever we needed it. Dongfeng Honda
cars in China. And a central machine in each production line, is safe in the knowledge that the spindles will not fail unexpectedly,
critical for high productivity and quality, is the multifunction with the corresponding catastrophic effect on production and
machining centre. costs. Furthermore we can optimize our production, as far as
These machining centres must operate for very long times in machining centre availability is concerned, by replacing any
a range of speeds and loads, which often change very quickly, necessary bearings during planned maintenance stops”
as they drill, cut and turn away the metal to form the finished
Features of the SKF Multilog Online System TMU:
products of engine block and engine head. So it is absolutely
essential that the machining centre spindle operates within The TMU is a 3 channel 24 hour/day surveillance device designed
very tight tolerances to deliver the accuracy required of Honda to protect critical rotating assets in rugged manufacturing
engines. Key to spindle performance are the bearings that environments. It can warn of developing machine problems such
support and rotate the spindle across its tough work cycles. as bearing damage, spindle or shaft imbalance, poor lubrication
And bearing performance and reliability are therefore critical etc and provide diagnostic information for improving reliability
to keeping the very high cost spindles delivering high quality and quality. Monitoring is done according to user-defined
machining output at cost effective levels demanded of all modern conditions, making it applicable in a wide number of industries.
manufacturing plants. This in turn means it is very important, to In addition it has a special feature which rapidly detects shocks,
detect early indications of any bearing wear that could take the such as would occur with a spindle crash, and instantly shuts
spindle outside its required tolerances or lead to bearing failure down the machine helping to prevent severe damage to machine
that would damage the spindle assembly and require very heavy components. It has a distributed architecture allowing easy and
costs to repair, as well as a long period of loss of production. flexible expansion to cover small, medium or large machine or
manufacturing systems. www.skf.com
Depending on a number of factors a typical machining centre
spindle would have an operational life of 1- 2 years before
replacement of bearings was needed. The actual life is difficult
to determine and a lot of off-line measuring, requiring stopping SEW delivers unmatched maintenance support
production, is needed before taking the decision for a full spindle
bearing replacement action. When shut-down periods approach, and scheduled maintenance
and repairs are carried out, it is important that Australia’s mines
Dongfeng Honda maintenance manager, Mr. Chen Shi, was and industrial facilities have access to premium levels of motor
using off-line monitoring in this way for some years and was and drive service and support—especially those in remote
concerned about the amount of lost time needed to carry out areas of the country. With an Australia-wide network of technical
this necessary maintenance. So, in the Honda tradition of support, assembly and service facilities staffed by teams of
challenging and trying new technology, he had the desire to engineers and technical experts, SEW-Eurodrive leads the way
upgrade to on-line monitoring. With on-line monitoring, sensors in this regard.
would track the spindle bearing’s condition 24 hours a day, and
give a signal at any signs of bearing wear or drop in performance
outside specified limits. But on-line monitoring of this sort had
not been applied before by Honda in China, so he had no in-
house experience to draw on.
So, looking for a partner in this challenge he invited SKF to
propose a solution for his machining centres. An SKF inspection
report led to a 5 months test and evaluation program of the TMU
together with Honda engineers. In this period a number of factors
needed to be determined;
• best location of vibration sensors on the spindle
• arranging cabling for good data transmission yet allowing
spindle full uninhibited movement for all functional machining
operations
• getting accurate control points from Honda’s PLC for all
According to SEW-Eurodrive Mechanical Service Team Leader,
machining operations
Frank Fedele, it’s the company’s extensive support infrastructure
• determining the spindle’s vibration spectrum and trend pattern that allows the motor and drives expert to deliver such high
for its machining operations for both the spindle head and levels of service. “Australia’s industrial and mining motor and
the bearing, across a range of typical application speeds and gear-unit users are able to send repair and maintenance jobs
forces. to SEW’s strategically located service and assembly facilities in
At the end of the test period the Honda engineers, now fully Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth,” he said. “We
trained on the TMU, were enthusiastic about the potential and provide the fastest turnaround possible to ensure end-users can
Vol 24 No 1
Maintenance News 43
get back into production as quickly as possible, after scheduled Defined Data”, which makes it possible for the user to save
maintenance or emergency breakdowns.” machine configurations as templates. All machine data for each
specific machine, such as machine dimensions, measurement
By assembling locally, stocking a comprehensive range of spare- distances, tolerances, and target values, are readily available
parts and providing 24-hour around-the-clock technical support, in the Fixturlaser XA Pro alignment tool. The hardware package
SEW-Eurodrive has gained a reputation as Australia’s most contains e.g. thin magnet brackets and an extension fixture,
dependable drive solutions provider. “SEW’s ability to supply which are useful when working in narrow spaces. A magnetic
total project lifecycle support throughout Australia sets us apart,” base is also included which will facilitate the mounting of the
said Fedele. measurement units on shafts with a big diameter.
Importantly, SEW-Eurodrive recently expanded its Perth sales Fixturlaser XA Ultimate
and service centre. The new facility is four times the size of the
company’s previous premises and has been purpose-designed Fixturlaser XA Ultimate is a measurement tool with a complete
to accommodate the assembly and repair of larger-sized software package for both shaft alignment and geometric
complete drive packages. measurements, such as flatness and straightness. Having
Industry can also access a wide range of technical literature and a properly aligned machine starts already at the time of its
product information via SEW-Eurodrive’s DriveGate online portal. installation, e.g. with checking if the machine foundation is skewed
Here, parts lists, CAD drawings and installation and operating or warped in any way, which would influence the machine’s
manuals, along with online support, can all be accessed to aid capability to work under optimal conditions. The Fixturlaser
product selection, installation, maintenance and commissioning. XA Ultimate tool gives the user access to all the software and
SEW-Eurodrive also offers motor and drive technology training hardware that is required for a successful machine installation
courses via the company’s new DriveAcademy training program. and consequently ensuring optimal running conditions for the
www.sew-eurodrive.com.au machine. www.fixturlaser.com
The bearings on the conveyor system were regularly failing After installing the new bearings, Pequiven is now
after just 15 days. As the plant was planning to increase its satisfied with the running times of the conveyor system
production capacity, it needed a bearing supplier that was and maintenance cost has been reduced significantly.
able to provide an integral solution to the bearing problem, Schaeffler now takes full responsibility of bearing
including maintenance advice and guidance. maintenance and has helped the customer develop a
special maintenance programme.
Schaeffler Venezuela recommended that Pequiven use a
coating material for the bearings, to improve the quality of email info.uk@schaeffler.com .
the housing material. Also, Schaeffler engineers noticed
that manual grease lubrication of the bearings was not
always being carried out correctly at the plant. Therefore, SPM®HD cuts maintenance costs at paper mill
along with new coating materials for the bearings,
Since the summer of 2010, Ortviken paper mill outside
Schaeffler recommended that the plant use automatic
Sundsvall, Sweden, uses the SPM HD measuring technique
lubrication systems to ensure that relubrication of the from SPM Instrument to measure bearing condition on four twin
bearings is controlled and that sufficient quantities of fresh wire presses.
grease is constantly supplied to the contact points inside
SCA Ortviken has been measuring bearing condition with SPM
the rolling bearings. HD, since summer 2010.
Schaeffler replaced the existing bearings with its RASE40- Ortviken paper mill, owned by SCA and located on the Gulf of
N-FA125 housed bearing units, with the housings coated Bothnia coast in Sweden, produ-ces coated publication papers,
with Corrotect®. Corrotect® is a relatively low cost, 0.5 to LWC and newsprint on four paper machines. The raw material
5µm thick zinc alloy coating with cathodic protection, which is fresh spruce pulpwood, mainly from SCA’s own forests in
is effective against condensation, rainwater, contaminated northern Sweden. The production ca-pacity is 850.000 tons of
water and weak alkaline and weak acidic cleaning agents. paper.
Under load, the coating is compacted into the surface For Ortviken, SPM HD is the solution to years of problems with
roughness profile and is partly worn away. The chromate bearing related breakdowns on low RPM machinery like the
coating and the passivation increase anti-corrosion twin wire presses, which are used for dewatering of the pulp.
protection and contribute to the optical appearance of the None of the monitoring systems installed in the mill provided
component. a dependable method for detection of bearing wear and
damage, and bearing replacements therefore were carried out
Corrotect® is ideal for small bearings and bearing mating in conjunction with timebased maintenance. The lack of reliable
parts that need to have a greater resistance to corrosion, bearing condition information often lead to the dismounting of the
for example drawn cup needle roller bearings with open wrong bearings, in turn causing breakdowns on other bearings
ends and thin-walled components in large numbers. in worse con-dition. The relatively expansive bearing damages
made dismounting difficult and in some cases the shaft would
Schaeffler also supplied its
also be damaged. Lengthy and unplanned production stops and
‘FAG Motion Guard Champion’ consequential damages requiring repair all induced significant
automatic lubrication system. additional costs.
FAG Motion Guard CHAMPION
Then in the summer of 2010, the Intellinova online system with
is a robust, electromechanically SPM HD was installed on Ortvi-ken’s four Andritz twin wire
driven unit that operates on presses. Following a short period of system calibration, six
replaceable batteries. bearing damages have been successfully identified to date.
The device is electronically controlled and has a back- Four bearings have been replaced during planned stops and
geared motor that enables the unit to discharge lubricant two more will be replaced in the near future. Examination of the
at adjustable intervals of one, three, six or 12 months. replaced bearings have verified that SPM HD does indicate the
correct type of bearing damage, and bea-ring replacement costs
A lubricant canister is screwed to the drive unit, holding
are now significantly reduced.
60, 120 or 250cm3 of lubricating grease. Automatic
pressure control at 5 bar is provided and the unit operates Urban Lander, maintenance manager at SCA Ortviken, comments:
”After a few months of bea-ring condition measurement with
in temperatures from –10°C up to 50°C. The device
SPM HD, we conclude that it works completely and to our full
is also protected against dust and splash water and is satisfaction. We are now planning for the application of SPM HD
immune to electromagnetic interference from surrounding on more low RPM machinery, and we can recommend SPM HD
equipment. to other users with bearing problems on such machinery.”
By using Motion Guard Select Manager software, the www.spminstrument.com
user can select the discharge interval for the application,
determine replenishment quantities and select preferred
lubricating greases. Maintenance Software Supports Facilities, Utilities, and
FAG Motion Guard Champion and Compact lubricators Industrial Plants
can be used on all types of plant, including pumps,
compressors, fans, conveyors and vehicles. SMGlobal has released FastMaint CMMS v. 5.3, a powerful
software application that makes it easy to manage plant
After supplying the Corrotect® coated bearings and maintenance, facility and building maintenance, resort and
automatic lubricators, the running time of the conveyor restaurant maintenance, and fleet maintenance.
system was improved as the bearings were now lasting
Solutions are available for use on a single Windows computer
more than twice the time of the original bearings – but this and on a LAN, as well as a web edition that need not be installed
still wasn’t long enough for Pequiven. Because of the very on each computer in the company because it can be accessed
harsh corrosive environment in which the bearings had using a standard web browser. For a web demo or to download
to operate, Schaeffler then recommended using stainless a fully-functional 30-day trial, www.smglobal.com.
steel bearings and a thermoplastic housing.
Vol 24 No 1
AMMJ Subscription Form
Asset Management and Maintenance Journal
Mail this form to: EIT P/L, PO Box 703, Mornington, VIC 3931 Australia or email: mail@maintenancejournal.com
ABN: 67 330 738 613 Phone: 03 59750083 Fax: 03 59755735 For Australia prices are inclusive of GST taxes.
Prices are in Australian Dollars and are valid until April 2011. This form may be photocopied. This form may be completed electronically.
Print Version Subscription (includes postage anywhere in the World): AUD $170 (US$ 170)
eAMMJ Annual Subscription for One Person: AUD $80 (US $80)
May be used by one person and stored on a single computer.
eAMMJ Annual Subscription for Single Site: AUD $120 (US $120)
May be distributed throughout a single site of your organisation.
eAMMJ Annual Subscription for Multiple Sites Worldwide: AUD $400 (US $400)
May be distributed to any site within your World wide corporation.
Start Issue: For new subscriptions please indicate which issue will be the start of your subscription:
Name of Subscriber
Position
Company Name
Address
E Charge to credit card - Mastercard Visa Card Other Cards are accepted but 2% fee applies.
25. HANDBOOK OF MECHANICAL IN-SERVICE INSPECTIONS – Pressure Vessels & Mechanical Plant
Clifford Matthews 690pp $495
This comprehensive volume gives detailed coverage of pressure equipment and other mechanical plant such as cranes and
rotating equipment. There is a good deal of emphasis on the compliance [UK standards] aspects and the duty of care requirements
placed on plant owners, operators, and inspectors.
26. BENCHMARK BEST PRACTICES IN MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT
Terry Wireman 228pp $130
This book will provide users with all the necessary tools to be successful in benchmarking maintenance management. It presents a
logical step-by-step methodology that will enable a company to conduct cost-effective benchmarking. It presents an overview of the
benchmarking process, a self analysis, and a database of the results of more than 100 companies that have used the analysis.
27. RCM - GATEWAY TO WORLD CLASS MAINTENANCE
A Smith & G Hinchcliffe 337pp $145
Includes detailed instructions for implementing and sustaining an effective RCM program; Presents seven real-world successful
case studies from different industries that have profited from RCM; Provides essential information on how RCM focuses your
maintenance organization to become a recognized ‘center for profit’. It provides valuable insights into preventive maintenance
practices and issues.
28. INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY REPAIR - Best Maintenance Practices Pocket Guide
R Smith, R K Mobley 537pp $105
The new standard reference book for industrial and mechanical trades. Industrial Machinery Repair provides a practical reference
for practicing plant engineers, maintenance supervisors, physical plant supervisors and mechanical maintenance technicians. It
focuses on the skills needed to select, install and maintain electro-mechanical equipment in a typical industrial plant or facility.
29. AN INTRODUCTION TO PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE 2nd Edition
Keith Mobley 337pp $195
This second edition of An Introduction to Predictive Maintenance helps plant, process, maintenance and reliability managers
and engineers to develop and implement a comprehensive maintenance management program, providing proven strategies for
regularly monitoring critical process equipment and systems, predicting machine failures, and scheduling maintenance accordingly.
30. MAINTENANCE PLANNING, SCHEDULING & COORDINATION
Dan Nyman and Joel Levitt 228pp $115
Planning, parts acquisition, work measurement, coordination, and scheduling. It also addresses maintenance management,
performance, and control; and it clarifies the scope, responsibilities, and contributions of the Planner/Scheduler function and the
support of other functions to Job Preparation, Execution, and Completion. This book tells the whole story of maintenance planning
from beginning to end.
Phone: Email:
Vol 24 No 1
And you thought
we just made bearings
SKF Reliability Systems
Combining over 100 years of experience to
optimise your productivity and profitability
Dynamic and Static Motor
Testing Systems and Services
Reliability Services Root Cause Failure Analysis
Project Management
Refurbishment Services
Non-Destructive Testing
Portable Condition
Energy & Sustainability Assessment
Monitoring Systems
Maintenance Strategy Review
January 10
17
24
5
12
27
PMS
OA1
FMC
RCF
3 MON VA1
PT
20 BTM ESA VA2 BTM
ML1 RCF
SUN 31 25 13 PME FMC Reliability
18 6 BTM PMS
OA1 RCF SRM Streamlined
11 28 Bearing Centered Maintenance
RCF Root Cause
SKF Reliability
BTM
TUE BTM DB
Locations
VA2
VA1 21 level 2
SKF Public Course
4 ML1 LB1 PME AUSTRALIA
26 Australia Day 14 OA1 WESTERN Failure Analysis
Systems (MS331)
FMC
MON 19 7 BTM BTM PMS
MIC SOUTH AUSTRALIA
OA1
12 WED 29 VA2 BTM Perth (WE204) SOUTH AUSTRALIA
5 VA1 22 BTM TERRITORY
TUE 27 BTM MIC
15 ML1 LB1
ESA NORTHERN Wingfield 9-12 February NEW SOUTH WALES Wingfield
20 8 BTM PMS
BTM Kalgoorlie Darwin 9 November NEW ZEALAND
13 THU 1 30 VA2
OA1
Technology
Newcastle 10-12 May
6 LB1 23 BTM Bearing 9-11 March 15 September VICTORIA Hamilton 21-22 September VICTORIA
28 CR 16 (WE201)
WED 21 9 BTM & Maintenance 16-18 November QUEENSLAND Oakleigh 4-8 October Smithfield Oakleigh
31
7
14 FRI 2 24 NEW SOUTH WALES Karatha Archerfield 8 July 27-28 July 22-24 November
29 CR LB1
17 Asset
THU 22 10 Bathurst 22-24 June 23 November WESTERN AUSTRALIA OAM Optimising NORTHERN TERRITORY
15 SAT 3 20-22 July Perth Mackay Perth Management through Darwin UT Ultrasonic
Testing
FRI 1 New Years Day
8 30 Canberra 16-18 February 9 February 22 September Maintenance Strategy 25-26 May (WI320)
23 level 2 (MS300)
16 10-12 August 25-27 May Mt Isa in rolling QUEENSLAND QUEENSLAND
9
SAT 2 August 22
29 Dubbo
13-15 April
3-5 August
26-28 October
12 FebruaryNEW PLYMOUTH
LB1 Lubrication
element bearings
level 1 QUEENSLAND
Townsville
Archerfield Archerfield
6-10 September
15 Townsville Ph: (06) 769 16-17 February
8 30 MSR UT Newcastle PAPUA NEW GUINEA 12 August Fax: (06) 769 5152
(WE203) 22-26 March WESTERN AUSTRALIA
SKF Reliability
SUN 1 Gladstone
23 OAM
8-10 June Lae AUSTRALIA 6497
SOUTHPALMERSTON NEW SOUTH WALES WESTERN AUSTRALIA Perth
February 21
28
Bank Holiday (NSW) 9
16 BTM
FMC 31 MSR UT ML1 30 Nov-2 Dec 24-26 August Wingfield
Ph: (06) 356 NORTH
Smithfield Perth
4-5 May
Mackay 30 August-3 September
14 MON 2 Picnic Day (NT) 24
DB MIC
28-29 January 23-27 August
Orange Fax: (06) 359 9145
12 October
OAM
7 BTM BTM ML1
RCF BTM FIJI 28-29 October Analysis
SUN LB1 VA1 17 23-25 February 1555 QUEENSLAND NEW ZEALAND VA1 Vibration
22 10 BTM CR
Suva VICTORIA Mt Isa
15 TUE 3 BTM FMC
14-16 September Archerfield Hamilton level 1 (WI202)
25 7-9 July Oakleigh 2-3 February NEW SOUTH WALES
OAM
8 PSF
BTM BTM ML1
RCF BTM Ph: (09) 238 10-11 August
MON 1
PSF VA1
CR CR LB1 VA1 18 Smithfield Lautoka 25 February 9079 23-25 February Toowoomba
23 OAM 11 BTM Fax: (09)
SOUTH AUSTRALIA Smithfield
BTM ML1 RCF 23-25 March 1 September238 9779
BTM FMC
OA1 BTM CAF
ESA 16 WED 4 BTM
26 13-15 July Maintenance 12-13 July
9 BTM ML1
OAM
BTM
25-27 May AUSTRALIA Wingfield PME Predictive 23-25 February
TUE 2
CAF RCF VA1
CR BTM ESA PT VA1 19 CR
NEW ZEALAND WESTERN
Ph: (03) 338 for Electric Motors SOUTH AUSTRALIA
BTM ML1 RCF
24 OAM
BTM 12 19-21 October 14-15 July QUEENSLAND
17 THU 5 BTM Whangarei Fax: (03) 338 1917
Kalgoorlie level 1 Wingfield
Systems
ning
19 Napier Hamilton Technician level Wingfield Oakleigh
12 12-14 October Ph: (03) 687 VICTORIA
11-13 May March
Handbook
5 Family & Community Fax:24(03) 688 4444 (WE265) 15-16 June 17-18 August Oakleigh
SUN 20
27 Day (ACT) Blackwater Palmerston North Christchurch 2640 NEW SOUTH WALES WESTERN AUSTRALIA
PMS VICTORIA 5-7 October
March 28 13 PMS IR1 7-9 December 15-17 June 20 July Smithfield Oakleigh Kalgoorlie WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Reliability and
21 6 UT
FMC
28 Bundaberg New Plymouth Ph: (06) 344
14 MON 21
MAR RCF
Fax: 4804
Crusher 21-23 September 19-20 October 1-2 September Perth
CR Improving
PMS
7 PMS OA1 ML1 1-3 June 20-22 July (06) 344 4112
WESTERN AUSTRALIA
IR1
29 14 1 Perth
Reliability level
maintenance
SUN 7 BTM PME BTM QUEENSLAND 9-11 March
22 Lower Hutt
OAM UT
Labour Day (VIC) PMS SPM
FMC
29 Cairns Archerfield 15-16 June
15 TUE MIC RCF
13-15 April (WI270) Perth NEW ZEALAND
22 17-19 August
training from
8 Adelaide Cup (SA) PMS PMS ML1
OA1 ESA
9-11 March 23-24 March 8-9 December
15 NEW SOUTH WALES
IR1
MON 1 Labour Day (WA) Canberra Day (ACT)
OAM BTM ML1
PME 30 BTM PME Hamilton
8 Emerald Nelson
The developm
BTM
SPM 23 UT
NEW ZEALAND
13-15 October
RCF ESA
30 Gladstone
SKF
CR ML1 RCF MSR FMC
FMC 16 PMS
WED 1 22-24 June 7-9 September Newcastle Maintenance
BTM ML1 VA1 23 PMS Proactive
ent and knowledg
BTM PMS
9 13-15 July
PMS
PME OA1 ML1 Hamilton
TUE 2 31 16 IR1
16-17 March Skills level 1 (WE241)
promote a
BTM RCF
24 OAM BTM ML1 ESA 9 UT BTM BTM Gladstone Christchurch 13-14 April VA2 Vibration
Analysis
10 BTM ML1 VA1
FMC 17 PMS BTM CR
MSR THU 2 ML1 RCF SPM
UT
24 PMS 23-25 March 13-15 October Smithfield Townsville
1-3 June NEW SOUTH WALES productive, e path for your
Christchurch level 2 (WI203)
WED 3 BTM DB
MSR 25 OAM BTM ML1
SPM UT 10 UT
17 PMS IR1 OA1
19-21 October Timaru 10-11 August
QUEENSLAND SOUTH AUSTRALIA Smithfield safe and innovative
9-10 November staff to VICTORIA
Mackay 2-4 November 21-25 June
work environm
PMS BTM
BTM ML1 VA1
FMC 18 FRI 3 25 Wingfield & Maintaining Oakleigh
11 27-29 July Dunedin Archerfield PT Selecting
18 QUEENSLAND 8-12 November
THU 4 4-6 May level
ent
BTM
26 OAM 11 23-25 November 28-29 January Power Transmission WESTERN AUSTRALIA
MSR
19 PMS
SAT 4 Moronbah TASMANIA Archerfield
12 23-25 February Invercargill Mt Isa 26-30 July 1 (WE290)
FRI 5 Hobart Perth
27 Mt Isa 14-16 December 23-24 June SOUTH AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES 26-30 July
20 SOUTH AUSTRALIA 16-19 February
2010 SKF Training
22 3-4 May
15 Geraldton Smithfield
8
SAT 1 December 12
19
26 20-22 July 9 June
1 December
5 27 Christmas Day
SUN 20
June 27 13
on
For further information courses:
20 6
13 28 Boxing Day
Engineering
The Power of Knowledge
6 MON 21
26 14 BTM
future
Public, On site or
SUN 21 PMS BTM 7 BTM
Queens Birthday 29
SKF
14 TUE
E rs.marketing@skf.com
7 Foundation Day (WA) 22
MON
VA1 29 MAR 15 BTM
P 03 9269 0763
22 PMS BTM 8 BTM RCF
BTM PME RCF VA3 BTM ESA 30
15 WED 1
BTM
8 BTM 23
30 16 BTM
.au/training
BTM ML1 VA1
TUE 1 23 PMS BTM
CR
9 BTM RCF
W www.skf.com
BTM PME RCF BTM VA3 BTM 31
9 BTM ESA
16 THU 2 24
WED 2 BTM ML1
PMS PT
VA1 CR 17
24 BTM 10
17 BTM
FRI 3 VA3
25
BTM ML1
10 BTM 18
THU 3 25 PMS PT 11
18 SAT 4
11
FRI 4 26 The Power
12
19
of Knowledge
SAT 5
Engineering
For further information contact SKF Reliability Systems on 03 9269 0763 or email rs.marketing@skf.com