0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
37 vues2 pages
Renato Constantino argues that traditional histories focus too much on the rich and powerful and neglect the perspectives and roles of ordinary people. He advocates writing a "people's history" that places the struggles and collective efforts of the masses at the center. Constantino believes a people's history that chronicles how societies changed through the contributions of the common people can serve as a guide for understanding the past and present. Such a history of the Philippines must focus on the struggles of Filipinos against colonial oppression, which was the unifying experience that shaped the nation.
Renato Constantino argues that traditional histories focus too much on the rich and powerful and neglect the perspectives and roles of ordinary people. He advocates writing a "people's history" that places the struggles and collective efforts of the masses at the center. Constantino believes a people's history that chronicles how societies changed through the contributions of the common people can serve as a guide for understanding the past and present. Such a history of the Philippines must focus on the struggles of Filipinos against colonial oppression, which was the unifying experience that shaped the nation.
Renato Constantino argues that traditional histories focus too much on the rich and powerful and neglect the perspectives and roles of ordinary people. He advocates writing a "people's history" that places the struggles and collective efforts of the masses at the center. Constantino believes a people's history that chronicles how societies changed through the contributions of the common people can serve as a guide for understanding the past and present. Such a history of the Philippines must focus on the struggles of Filipinos against colonial oppression, which was the unifying experience that shaped the nation.
TOWARDS A PEOPLE’S HISTORY What has hitherto regarded as history is
predominantly a conscious record of the rich and
Who is Renato Constantino? powerful… not necessarily just and correct What is history according to him? The Inarticulate in History What do we mean by “people’s history” and The individuals who made history colorful could what is its significance? not have made history without the people The various changes in society and the upward TOWARDS A PEOPLE’S HISTORY climb of civilization could not have been possible without the people playing definite and By: Renato Constantino irreplaceable roles in each epoch. The young Renato Constantino learned about patriotism The inarticulate as individuals cannot have their from his grandmother, who told him endless stories deeds recorded in history. However, their about friar abuses and her family’s sufferings under collective effort can and should be chronicled American rule, and from his lawyer-father, who was and given its deserved importance critical of leaders who did not fight for the country’s independence All powerful leaders, and especially tyrants, exerted efforts to insure that the history would Colonial Scholarship be written in their image Filipino historians were captive of Spanish and It is only within the context of a people’s history American historiography that individuals, events, and institutions can be Both viewed Philippine history according to correctly appraised their prejudices A people’s history can serve as a concrete guide The need to rewrite Philippine History from the for understanding a developing society point of view of Filipinos Redressing the Imbalance There were scholars who tried but they failed New approaches and new techniques in viewing The Task at Hand events and writing history is a reaction to the official histories used to justify the backward The task is to advance to the writing of a truly conditions of their colonies Filipino History When intellectual decolonization shall have been The principal focus must be on the anonymous accomplished, a historical account can be masses of individuals and social forces produced which will present a fuller, more generated by their collective lives and struggles balanced picture of reality History is the story of man the collective Limitations and a Beginning Without society there can be no history and To obtain a comprehensive knowledge of the there are no societies without men activities of the masses in each period of our history will be an arduous task Motivators of History The immediate concern of the times is for a The mass of human beings are the motivators of work that can present in a practical way change and of history The need for a real people’s history becomes a The common people possess the capacity to more urgent we Filipinos search for truly make history Filipino solutions to Filipino problems Historic struggles provide the people with Rediscovering the Past lessons in their upward march and give form and strength to the constantly changing society A people’s history must rediscover the past in order to make it reusable ◦ Such a history can serve as a guide to The only way a history of the Philippines can be present and succeeding generations in Filipino is to write the basis of the struggles of the continuing struggle for change the people, for in these struggles the Filipino emerged ◦ It must deal with the past with a view to explaining the present The Filipino resistance to colonial oppression is the unifying thread of Philippine history ◦ It must be not only descriptive but analytical
◦ It must not deal only with objective
developments but also bring the discussion to the realm of value judgments
◦ In our particular case, history should
show how a nation was born
◦ A history that serves as a guide to the
people in perceiving reality is itself a liberating factor The Unifying Thread The ideas of the dominant classes predominates at any given period they are not the only ones that exist. Dissenting ideas emerged to coexist with the dominant ones and come into confrontation with them Economic struggles are often fought as political and intellectual battles The various revolts that broke out in the Philippines constitute practice which changed not only the circumstances but man himself These struggles were the schools of the masses: their quantitative occurrence as localized or regional actions led to a qualitative change: the birth of a nation The Motive Force The rich tradition of struggle has become a motive force of Philippine history Participation in mass actions raises the level of consciousness of the masses The more active they are the more they become active and the more telling their contribution to the changing of society and the changing of their own attitudes Struggle is the people’s historic right and it alone can make them free