Mycologia, 97(1), 2005, pp. 33–44.

2005 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897

Isolation and identification of fungal communities in compost and vermicompost
Antonella Anastasi Giovanna Cristina Varese1 Valeria Filipello Marchisio
Department of Plant Biology, Viale Mattioli 25, 10125, Turin, Italy

Abstract: This research illustrates the qualitative and quantitative composition of the mycoflora of both a green compost (thermophilically produced from plant debris) and a vermicompost (mesophilically produced by the action of earthworms on plant and animal wastes after thermophilic preconditioning). Fungi were isolated using three media (PDA, CMC, PDA plus cycloheximide), incubated at three temperatures (24, 37 and 45 C). Substantial qualiquantitative differences in the species composition of the two composts were observed. The total fungal load was up to 8.2 105 CFU/g dwt in compost and 4.0 105 CFU/g dwt in vermicompost. A total of 194 entities were isolated: 118 from green compost, 142 from vermicompost; 66 were common to both. Structural characterization of this kind is necessary to determine the most appropriate application of a compost and its hygienic quality. Key words: compost, compost hygiene, compost quality, earthworms, fungi


Composting is the biological conversion of solid organic waste into usable end products such as fertilizers, substrates for mushroom production and biogas. Moreover, their high organic matter content and biological activity make composts effective in a variety of applications, including erosion control, revegetation, biofiltration and bioremediation (Alexander 1999). The active component involved in the biodegradation and conversion processes during composting is the resident microbial community, among which fungi play a very important role. The biomass ratio of fungi to prokaryotes in compost is about 2:1 (Sparling et al 1982, Wiegant 1992). In addition, fungi use
Accepted for publication 18 Aug 2004. 1 Corresponding author. Email:

many carbon sources, mainly lignocellulosic polymers and can survive in extreme conditions. They mainly are responsible for compost maturation (Miller 1996). A better understanding of fungal diversity in compost may prove crucial in predicting its best application. Fungi affect soil fertility, suppress plant diseases and promote mushroom growth (Straatsma and Samson 1993). They also degrade complex polymers such as polyaromatic compounds or plastics and are being increasingly applied to bioremediate soils contaminated with a wide range of pollutants (Kastner and Mahro 1996, Eggen and Sveum 1999, Minussi et al 2001). Monitoring fungal diversity is essential to detect fungi hazardous to humans, animals and plants and to optimize compost quality standards (Summerbell et al 1994). Much information exists about the succession of fungi, mainly thermotolerant and thermophilic fungi, in conventional two-phase thermogenic composting (Straatsma et al 1994, Ross and Harris 1983, Fermor et al 1979, Chang and Hudson 1967). These data refer mainly to mushroom compost, straw compost or experimental compost obtained by environmentally controlled and standardized processes. However, industrial composting uses a variety of procedures and raw materials (Beffa et al 1998) and hence results in very different end products. In contrast, very little is known about fungal communities in mesophilic processes such as vermicomposting, an alternative technology increasingly used in many countries, including Italy (Beffa et al 1998, Masciandaro et al 2000). Earthworms stabilize organic residues and reduce pathogenic bacteria and other human pathogens (Eastman et al 2001) and also can greatly affect fungal communities. They select fungal species by influencing spore germination and creating microsites favorable or unfavorable to fungus development (Brown 1995, Tiunov and Scheu 2000). The few studies on these mechanisms have provided partly contradictory data and stressed the importance of monitoring the hygienic aspects of this mesophilic process in fungal communities (Beffa et al 1998). In brief, since composting methods and different source materials are associated with differences in the composition of a fungal community, monitoring of the resident fungal population in a compost is 33

After preconditioning for several days. Diversity indexes based on species richness (Margalef index) and species relative abundance (BergerParker. Shannon. except for CMC at 45 C and CX at all temperatures (TABLE I). MATERIALS AND METHODS The following physical dimensions. sclerotia or vesicles. Simpson indexes) were applied to assess biodiversity (Biodiversity PRO 1997). and incubation at 37 C and 45 C allowed .6% of the dry matter and the C/N ratio 15. the moisture content 40%. As diversity increases. The culture and/or incubation conditions produced different load values within the same compost. they were transferred to the media recommended by the authors of selected genus monographs for species identification. of which 118 came from C and 142 from VC.0 from 5. species and genera load) and between all treatments (three media and three incubation temperatures) in the composts. 0. After determination of their genera (Domsch et al 1980. however.0 104 to 8. SM with RESULTS The total fungal load was high in both composts: from 5.5 m high) composed of 70% dung (from cows. the Berger-Parker index from the formula d Nmax/N (where Nmax is the number of individuals in the most abundant species). The final dilution (1: 20 000) was plated (1 ml per plate) on 11 replicates: five of potato-dextrose agar (PDA).5 m high) from plant debris from various sources by a conventional thermophilic process that lasted ca 6 mo. poultry and various zoo animals) and 30% plant debris from various sources. Fungi were identified conventionally according to their macroscopic and microscopic features. Both composts were stored in polypropylene bags 1–3 mo at 10 C before being sold. humic organic carbon (humic acid fulvic acid) 7. a significant reduction in CFU/g dwt was induced by higher incubation temperatures and the addition of cycloheximide. We therefore used these indexes in their reciprocal form 1/d and 1/D (Magurran 1988). VC1–10). A total of 194 fungal entities were identified from the two composts. Filipello Marchisio et al 1996). unless denoted otherwise. and 4 to 4. Vermicompost (VC) was produced in an outdoor pile (3 m wide. Multivariate analysis (Detrended Correspondence Analysis-DCA) was used to evaluate quali-quantitative differences in the composition of the mycofloras of the two composts and between the 10 samples of each compost (CANOCO 1998). During this mesophilic phase the temperature never exceeded 25–30 C.34 MYCOLOGIA clamp connections or positive to the reaction with Diazonium Blue B salts (DBB).2 105 CFU/g dwt in C. three of carboxy-methyl cellulose agar (CMC) and three of PDA supplemented with cycloheximide (CX) to retard the growth of all fungi. according to Summerbell (1985).3 10 105 CFU/g dwt in VC. In C. According to Magurran (1988). 37 C and 45 C to isolate mesophilic and thermotolerant/ thermophilic fungi with the result that 33 replicates were made for each sample.2. Moreover. depending on media or incubation temperature (TABLE I).05) of the differences between the two composts (total load. All statistics were obtained from the highest load of each species in the 9 treatments of each sample. Only 66 were common to both composts (TABLE II). during which the piles were turned periodically by machine.6% of the dry matter and the C/N ratio about 25. 50 m long. were examined according to the guidelines proposed by the Piedmont Region (Trombetta et al 1998). Compost (C) was produced in an outdoor pile (3 m wide. higher temperatures. Ten approximately 1 kg samples per compost (C1–10. earthworms (Lumbricus rubellus Hoffmeister) were added (50 103 worms per m3 organic matter) and the pile was turned periodically by machine. von Arx 1981. the two population structures were analyzed with the rank-abundance plot (Biodiversity PRO 1997). The Mann-Whitney test (StatView 1988) was run to assess the significance (P 0. the Margalef index was calculated from the formula DMg (S 1)/ln N (here and throughout. 1. temperatures and moisture measurements were taken outdoors and are approximations. were classified as basidiomycetes. In VC. S is the number of fungal entities and N is the total number of individuals).9%). the moisture content 38.05) of the differences of each index between the two composts. The number of colony forming units per g of dry weight (CFU/g dwt) was calculated both for the total mycoflora and for each species or morphotype.9. Kiffer and Morelet 1997). The load values in C always were higher. Employment of the CMC and CX media. This work focuses on the species composition and load of the mycoflora of two mature composts marketed by an Italian firm: a compost currently used as a bioactivator in landfills and a vermicompost mainly applied in agriculture. Sterile mycelia (SM) were classified according to their hyphal pigments and their production of chlamydospores. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney test for independent groups (StatView 1988) was run to assess the significance (P 0. The greatest number of species were isolated from both composts on PDA incubated at 24 C. 50 m long. The maximum temperature during the composting was 60 C. needed to determine its quality and field of application (Peters et al 2000). d and D decrease. humic organic carbon (humic acid fulvic acid) 3. Plates were incubated at 24 C. The pH of the final product was 7. Hanlin 1990. the Simpson index from the formula D {[ni(ni 1)]/[N(N 1)]}. The pH of the final product was 7.5%. the Shannon index from the formula H Spi(lnpi) (where pi is the proportion of individuals found in the ith species). A 10 g portion of each sample was suspended in 90 ml Na4P2O7·10 H2O to disperse organic colloids. cycloheximide and carboxy-methyl cellulose all reduced CFU/g dwt values. further dilutions were made in NaCl (0. allow isolation of slow-growing colonies and focus on fungi of medical interest (Airaudi and Filipello Marchisio 1996. during which the temperature rose to 60 C.

2 104 in VC versus 0 CFU/g dwt in C. Both loads were composed mainly of thermotolerant A.0 104 and 1.1 104 in VC versus 1.8 105 CFU/g dwt in C and 1.ANASTASI ET AL: FUNGAL COMMUNITIES IN COMPOST AND VERMICOMPOST 35 TABLE I.0 104 CFU/g dwt respectively in both composts).0·104 a* a* b* c* ac* bc c c bc No. 8–10) and the entities equally distributed between C and VC. of fungal entities 70 42 43 32 17 9 25 5 3 (31) (6) (7) (5) (3) (0) (3) (0) (0) 4. 4–7) and the entities found only or preponderant in VC. Mean fungal load (CFU/g dwt SE) and number of fungal entities isolated in compost (C) and vermicompost (VC) on 3 media (PDA. CX) incubated at 24 C. fumigatus var. mainly in C4 (FIG. CMC.105 CFU/g dwt in VC. mainly .0·105 2.1·104 4.1 104 in C versus 2.6·105 1.2·105 1.03) showed prevalence in C and associated with C8 and C5 respectively (FIG.2 105 CFU/g dwt in C. particularly owing to the presence of Corynascus sepedonium (mainly present in VC3). 2). Of the most abundant species in both composts.4·105 4. aurantiogriseum (P 0.5·105 9. There are three zones along the 1 axis: zone I containing most of the C samples (C4–10) and the entities found only or preponderant in C. The load of zygomycetes was similar in C and VC with greater species diversity in C (TABLE IV).0·104 2. though P.1·105 1.8·105 6.7 104 CFU/ g dwt in C). This difference is not signif- icant. Eurotium chevalieri (mainly present in VC6).5·105 9. 2) shows the distribution of the samples and the 194 fungal entities. the greater number of species corresponds to higher biodiversity index values (TABLE III). The Aspergillus load was not significantly different: 1.4·105 5.8·104 6.9·104 5.0·104 3. or found only in C or in VC. which demonstrates the quantitative domination of two species.5·104 9. Mann-Whitney test) among the load of the same compost obtained in different culture condition and/or incubation temperatures and * indicates significant differences between C and VC in the same culture conditions. Chrysosporium and Scopulariopsis species prevailed in VC (respectively 1.1·105 3. aurantiogriseum var. and 3.3·104 VC 8. and Trichoderma species (8. 2).9·104 1. The genera with the highest load and number of species in both composts were Penicillium and Aspergillus. Number of entities isolated from C only and from VC only in brackets C PDA 24 C PDA 37 C PDA 45 C CMC 24 C CMC 37 C CMC 45 C CX 24 C CX 37 C CX 45 C 8. In VC.6·105 2.3·105 7. There were no significant differences between composts in the quantitative composition of the two sets of Cladosporium and Acremonium species (about 5. The lower evenness of C is illustrated in the rank abundance plot (FIG. and many species solely were present in C or in VC (TABLE II).4·105 1.7·104 2. Both composts were dominated by mitosporic fungi (including the ascomycetes in their anamorphic state) (TABLE IV). which displayed high loads in all the samples and was located in zone II (FIG.0012) in C (7. They included Aspergillus fumigatus var. Absidia corymbifera alone was isolated from C only.3 105 CFU/g dwt) and was associated with it in the DCA and included in zone I (FIG.0·105 2.0·104 1. namely the Scedosporium state of Pseudallescheria boydii and Aspergillus fumigatus. The number of species and the load of ascomycetes were higher in VC (TABLE IV). the isolation of a good number of species that otherwise would have been missed: 24 from C and 30 from VC (TABLE I). flavus (mainly present in VC2. zone III containing most of the VC samples (VC1.5·104 5. roseopurpureum (P 0. 1). fumigatus (TABLE II).2·105 8. Paecilomyces variotii and Thermomyces lanuginosus. zone II containing C and VC samples (C1–3 e VC3.9·104 4.0 105 CFU/g dwt in VC and 1.05. The DCA scatterplot (FIG. 2).1·104 2.10) (TABLE II.5·105 1.2 103 CFU/g dwt) were present exclusively in C.6·105 1.3·105 1. The total load of Penicillium was 3.013) and P. 15 zygomycetes. 45 ascomycetes.0·104 4. 2). 2). The 194 fungal entities comprised 117 mitosporic fungi. 37 C.8·105 2. of fungal entities 98 52 37 30 19 15 30 19 6 (46) (11) (3) (4) (4) (1) (2) (4) (1) Different letters indicate significant differences (P 0. Other species described as thermotolerant or thermophilic (Domsch et al 1980) were isolated at 37 and 45 C from both composts with no significant load differences.1·104 a* a* b* a* ab* bc d d c No. 2). 45 C.6·104 2. 14 SM morphotypes and three basidiomycete morphotypes (TABLE II). whereas Fusarium species prevailed in C (3. FIG. 2.1 103 CFU/g dwt in VC). the thermotolerant fungus Scedosporium state of Pseudallescheria boydii displayed a significantly greater load (P 0. ellipticus. but present in smaller quantities and thus regarded as occasionals (FIG. and Talaromyces flavus var. Malbranchea cinnamomea.3.

7·103 1.W.3 102 — — 7.3·102 3.7·104 6.0·103 3. Gams Acremonium humicola (Onions & Barron) W.8·102 — — — — 9. 4.2·103 3.0·102 1.3·102 1. ellipticus Aspergillus niger van Tiegham Aspergillus ochraceus Wilhelm Aspergillus oryzae (Ahlburg) Cohn var.1·103 6.2·105 5.0·102 1.3·103 6.0·102 — — 4.9·103 — 4.B.3·102 — — — — 2. & V.1·104 1.0·102 VC CFU/g dwt — — 1.B.0·102 2.6·104 1.0·103 — 6.7·103 9.9·103 1.1·103 2.0·102 — 9. Fungal entities isolated from compost (C) and vermicompost (VC) and their load (CFU/g dwt) expressed as the average of the highest values recorded in each of the 10 samples C CFU/g dwt 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Absidia corymbifera (Cohn) Saccardo & A.5·103 2. Gams Acremonium sp. Gams Acrodontium griseum (Fassatiova) de Hoog ` Acrophialophora fusispora (S.8·103 2. oryzae Aspergillus puniceus Kwon & Fennell Aspergillus sulphureus (Fresenius) Thom & Church Aspergillus terreus Fennel and Raper var.1·105 1.0·102 3.0·103 — 9.2·103 5.8·103 9.0·102 1.0·102 6.0·103 — 3. 2 Acremonium strictum W. Trotter Acremonium charticola (Lindau) W.5·103 1.0·103 — 3. Gams Acremonium fusidioides (Nicot) W. columnaris Aspergillus fumigatus Fresenius var.6·103 — 9.2·103 — — — 6. Emmons) von Arx (Myceliophthora state) Cunninghamella elegans Lendner Cylindrocarpon sp. fumigatus Aspergillus fumigatus Raper & Fennel var. 1 Acremonium sp.0·103 2. flavus Aspergillus flavus Raper & Fennell var.36 MYCOLOGIA TABLE II.4·103 — 6.2·103 7. africanus Aspergillus terreus Thom var.8·102 1.3·102 4.7·102 — 1.5·102 — 3. Gams Acremonium chrysogenum (Thrirumalachar & Sukapure) W. Saksena) Samson Alternaria alternata (Fries: Fries) von Keissler Aphanoascus terreus (Randhawa & Sandhu) Apinis (Chrysosporium state) Apiospora montanei Saccardo (Arthrinium state) Arthroderma tuberculatum Kuehn (Myceliophthora state) Ascodesmis microscopica (Crouan) Seaver Aspergillus candidus Link : Fries Aspergillus flavus Link : Fries var.0·103 2. Gams Acremonium persicinum (Nicot) W.9·103 1.3·103 — 3.0·102 3.0·103 9.3·102 1.4·103 1.W.0·103 9.9·103 — — 9.4·103 1. pullulans Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin Beauveria brongniartii (Saccardo) Petch Botryotinia fuckeliana (de Bary) Whetzel (Botrytis state) Chaetomium bostrycodes Zopf Chaetomium funicola Cooke Chaetomium globosum Kunze : Fries Chaetomium nigricolor L.5·102 1.0·102 5.0·103 — 2. Moreau ex Valenta) W.0·102 4.0·103 9.0·104 9.2·104 5. Ellis Cladosporium cladosporioides (Fresenisus) de Vries Cladosporium herbarum (Persoon : Fries) Link Cladosporium oxysporum Berkeley & Curtis Cladosporium sphaerospermum Penzig Cordyceps memorabilis Cesati (Paecilomyces state) Corynascus sepedonium (C.7·103 — 1.7·103 4. Emmons) von Arx Corynascus sepedonium (C.0·102 7.7·103 4. Gams Acremonium sclerotigenum (F.0·104 4.0·102 3.5·104 — . terreus Aspergillus versicolor (Vuillemin) Tiraboschi Aspergillus wentii Wehmer Aureobasidium pullulans (de Bary) Arnaud var.0·102 8. Ames Chrysosporium indicum (Randhawa & Sandhu) Garg Chrysosporium merdarium (Link : Fries) Carmichael Chrysosporium queenslandicum Apinis & Rees Chrysosporium tropicum Carmichael Cladosporium chlorocephalum (Fresenius) Mason & M.

0·102 — 3. Chien Mortierella sp. Gams & Veen baas-Rijks Mortierella humilis Linnemann ex W.9·102 4.0·102 4.9·104 — 6.ANASTASI TABLE II.8·103 4.7·102 5.1·104 6.5·103 .7·103 4. Leptosphaeria coniothyrium (Fuckel) Saccardo (Coniothyrium state) Malbranchea cinnamomea (Libert) van Oorschot & de Hoog Microascus brevicaulis S.7·103 3.0·104 4.8·102 — 6.4·103 — 3.4·104 a — — 2. Smith Doratomyces purpureofuscus (Schweinitz : Fries) Morton & G.4·103 2. 4 Geomyces pannorum (Link) Sigler & Carmichael var.0·102 7.Y.0·103 1.6·103 1.8·102 — — 1.8·102 7.8·103 1.0·102 — 10.3·104 1. Graphium putredinis (Corda) S.0·102 b 3.0·103 2.9·104 — 2. pannorum Geotrichum sp. thermoidea Hypocrea rufa (Person : Fries) Fries (Trichoderma state) Leptographium sp.0·103 9. Abbott (Scopulariopsis state) Microascus cirrosus Curzi Microascus manginii (Loubiere) Curzi (Scopulariopsis state) ` Moniliella suaveolens (Burri & Staub) de Hoog var.7·104 7.3·103 8.0·102 — 6.7.0·103 1.7·103 6.5·102 3. 1 Fusarium sp. Gilmaniella macrospora Moustafa Gliocladium sp.3·102 — — — 4. Smith Emericella nidulans (Eidam) Vuillemin var.0·103 1. Gams Mortierella indohii C.1·103 2.2·103 — 2. Gams Mortierella hyalina (Harz) W.0·103 1. 2 Mortierella sp. 3 Fusarium sp.1·103 4. 2 Fusarium sp.6·104 6.8·103 1.1·103 — 8.9·1033 — — 6.0·102 — 1.9·103 1.0·103 b 1.0·103 1.7·103 7.9·103 — 4.0·102 1. fischeri Neosartorya spinosa (Raper & Fennell) Kozakiewicz Paecilomyces variotii Bainier 1.1·103 — — 1.3·102 2. nidulans Engyodontium album (Limber) de Hoog Epicoccum nigrum Link Eremascus fertilis Stoppel Eurotium amstelodami Mangin Eurotium chevalieri Mangin Eurotium intermedium Blaser Eurotium montevidense (Talice & Mackinnon) Malloch & Cain Eurotium rubrum Konig et al Eutypella scoparia (Schweinitz : Fries) Ellis & Everhart (Libertella state) Exophiala moniliae de Hoog Exophiala pisciphila McGinnis & Padhye Exophiala sp.7·102 3. griseo-cyanus Nectria sp.0·102 9.0·103 — 1.0·103 1.1·103 — — — — 2. 3 Mucor circinelloides (Hagem) Schipper f.0·102 — 2.0·103 9.0·102 8. 1 Mortierella sp. Neosartorya fischeri (Wehemer) Malloch & Cain var. Continued ET AL: FUNGAL COMMUNITIES IN COMPOST AND VERMICOMPOST 37 C CFU/g dwt 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 Doratomyces microsporus (Saccardo) Morton & G. Fennelia nivea (Wiley & Simmons) Samson (Aspergillus state) Fusarium oxysporum Schlechtendahl : Fries Fusarium sp. fuscoatra Humicola grisea Cooney & Emerson var.0·102 — — 9.4·104 — — 6.0·103 — — — 9.0·103 7. Huges Haematonectria haematococca (Berkeley & Broome) Samuels & Niremberg (Fusarium state) Humicola fuscoatra Traaen var.5·102 — — 6. nigra Mortierella alliacea Linnemann Mortierrella alpina Peyronel Mortierella chlamydospora (Chesters) van der Plaats-Niterink Mortierella echinosphaera van der Plaats-Niterink Mortierella globalpina W.0·103 7.103 a 9.8·103 VC CFU/g dwt — 9.P.

echinulatum ` Penicillium expansum Link Penicillium glabrum (Wehmer) Westling Penicillium glandicola (Oudemans) Seifert & Samson Penicillium herquei Bainier & Sartory Penicillium implicatum Biourge Penicillium islandicum Sopp Penicillium italicum Wehmer var.0·104 2.0·102 3.2·103 4.1·103 1.0·102 1.1·103 — 4.0·104 1.1·102 — — 4.7·104 3.9·102 — — 8.0·102 — 1.2·105 b — — — 3.2·104 — 2. verrucosum Penicillium waksmanii Zaleski Phialemonium obovatum W.0·103 2.0·103 8.8·102 1.1·103 7.0·103 9.3·105 a 7. exigua ´ Phoma sp. aurantiogriseum Penicillium brevicompactum Dierckx Penicillium canescens Sopp Penicillium chermesinum Biourge Penicillium chrysogenum Thom Penicillium citrinum Thom Penicillium dierckxii Biourge Penicillium digitatum Saccardo Penicillium diversum Raper & Fennell Penicillium echinulatum Raper & Thom ex Fassatiova var. Phomopsis sp.3·102 — — — — 7.0·103 9.0·102 2.0·103 1.7·103 — 1.0·104 — VC CFU/g dwt 3. Continued MYCOLOGIA C CFU/g dwt 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 Penicillium aurantiogriseum Dierckx var. 1 Penicillium spinulosum Thom Penicillium verrucosum Dierckx var.3·103 7.3·102 6.0·102 9.9·103 3.7·103 — — 1.4·103 1.3·104 1.0·103 — 4.7·102 — — 2. Gams & Niremberg (Fusarium state) Preussia fleischhakii (Auerswald) Cain Preussia sp. Plectosporium tabacinum (van Beyma) M.E.4·103 4.4·103 1. W.0·102 1.3·102 5.0·104 — 2.0·102 2.9·103 1.2·103 b 9.5·104 9.3·103 1.5·102 1.8·102 8.0·103 1.9·102 1.7·103 9.1·102 — — 7.8·104 a — 7.0·102 1.7·103 1.8·102 1.3·102 4.9·104 a 2.5·103 — — 4.4·103 2.5·105 — 2.4·103 4. italicum Penicillium janczewskii Zaleski Penicillium jensenii Zaleski Penicillium minioluteum Dierckx Penicillium ochrochloron Biourge Penicillium paxilli Bainer Penicillium piceum Raper & Fennel Penicillium purpurescens (Sopp) Raper & Thom Penicillium purpurogenum Stoll Penicillium restrictum Gilmann & Abbott Penicillium rolfsii Thom var.8·103 2. Palm.5·103 — 2.2·103 3.0·103 — — — 7.0·102 3. Phoma exigua Desmazieres var.3·103 9. Gams & McGinnis Phialophora cyclaminis van Beyma Phialophora hoffmannii group (van Beyma) Schol-Schwarz Phialophora sp.1·104 3. Pseudallescheria boydii (Shear) McGinnis et al Pseudallescheria boydii (Shear) McGinnis et al (Scedosporium state) Pseudogymnoascus roseus Raillo (Geomyces state) Rhizopus oryzae Went & Prinsen Geerligs Rollandina capitata Patouillard Scopulariopsis brumptii Salvanet-Duval Scopulariopsis koningii (Oudemans) Vuillemin Scopulariopsis sphaerospora Zach 1.0·102 b 1.38 TABLE II.0·103 .0·103 6.5·103 6.0·102 3. rolfsii Penicillium roquefortii Thom Penicillium roseopurpureum Dierckx Penicillium rugulosum Thom Penicillium simplicissimum (Oudemans) Thom Penicillium sp.0·103 3.1·102 1.

Meyer & Nicot Syncephalastrum racemosum Cohn ex Schroter Talaromyces flavus (Klocker) Stolk & Samson var.5·104 — — 6. Hughes Staphylotrichum coccosporum J. 2).05.0·102 1.5·104 4. This load is comparable with that observed in the richest soils (Thorn 1997) and justifies the use of C as a bioactivator in landfills.ANASTASI TABLE II.6·103 7.0·104 — — 4.5·103 1.0·102 1.0 105 CFU/g dwt).3·102 — — — 1. Benjamin var.4·104 — VC CFU/g dwt — 1.7·103 9. made mainly from plant debris.9·103 9. C.2·104 2. Continued ET AL: FUNGAL COMMUNITIES IN COMPOST AND VERMICOMPOST 39 C CFU/g dwt 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 197 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 Scytalidium lignicola Pesante Stachybotrys chartarum (Ehrenberg) S.1·102 — 1.0·102 1.1·103 2.0·102 7.7·102 — 1. flavus Talaromyces helicus (Raper & Fennell) C.0·102 — — 9. whose species fall mainly in zone I (FIG.2 105 CFU/g dwt. helicus Talaromyces helicus Stolk & Samson var.8·102 — — — 9. Rhizopus oryzae and Absidia corymbifera were present only in C5 and C3 respectively.4·103 — 1. 0.2·103 7. major Thermomyces lanuginosus Tsiklinsky Thielavia basicola Zopf Thielavia heterothallica von Klopotek (Myceliophthora state) Thysanophora penicilloides (Roumeguere) Kendrick ` Torrubiella confragosa Mains (Verticillium state) Trichoderma hamatum (Bonorden) Bainier Trichoderma harzianum Rifai Trichosporiella sporotrichoides van Oorschot Ulocladium alternariae (Cooke) Simmons Verticillium nigrescens Pethybridge Westerdykella dispersa (Clum) Cejp & Milko Basidiomycetes with clamp connections Basidiomycetes DBB Basidiomycetes with arthroconidia DBB Avellanea sterile mycelia Dark sterile mycelia Dark sterile mycelia with chlamydospores Dark sterile mycelia with chlamydospores in chain Dark sterile mycelia with chlamydospores in chain and setole Dark sterile mycelia with red exudate Dark sterile mycelia with sclerotia Dark sterile mycelia with setole Dark sterile mycelia with vesicles Hyaline sterile mycelia Hyaline sterile mycelia with vesicles Hyaline sterile mycelia with chlamydospores Yellow sterile mycelia Yellow sterile mycelia with red reverse 7. In VC the load was almost halved (up to 4.7 104 CFU/g dwt in VC versus 2.0·102 — 1.8·104 9.0·102 7.8·103 7.A. displayed a fungal load up to 8.8·104 7.6·104 1.7·103 1.R.0·102 4. whereas Cunninghamella elegans was present only in VC8–10 and Mucor circinelloides f.0·103 8.8·103 2.9·103 — — — 4.0·102 4. griseocyanus in VC2 (TABLE II.0·103 8. Dark SM were more varied in morphology in VC (mainly traceable in zone III) and overall load was 3 higher (8.9·103 6.9·103 9. Few basidiomycete morphotypes were isolated (2 from C.3·104 4. DISCUSSION These results contribute to the microbiological understanding of commercial composts. 14 from VC) (TABLE IV).9 104 CFU/g dwt in C) (TABLE II). though still very high . FIG.0·103 7.4·103 5. 3 from VC) compared with the SM morphotypes (6 from C. Mann-Whitney test) among the load of the same species in due to the genus Mortierella (10 species versus 5) (TABLE II).0·102 Different letters indicate significant differences (P compost and vermicompost.0·103 — 6.5·103 — 1.0·102 9.0·102 7. 2).6·103 9.0·103 1. whose fungal component is often overlooked despite the favorable and unfavorable effects of fungi in the situations in which composts are employed.8·102 3.

Penicillium. Cailleux 1973). non-optimal primer selection. Peters et al 2000.77 0. we found Scedosporium state of Pseudallescheria boydii and Aspergillus fumigatus. 1. This was due to the use of three kinds of media and three incubation temperatures to increase the chances of isolating rare or less competitive species. The higher biodiversity may be due to a favorable action of earthworms (Brown 1995.40 MYCOLOGIA TABLE III. were significantly higher in VC. The lower fungal density observed in VC is accompanied by a wider biodiversity. Their overall load was about 9 105 CFU/g dwt in C and about ⅓ in VC. Pseudallescheria and Thermomyces genera.84 b b b b Different letters indicate significant differences (P 0.29 a a a a 23.87 4. however. Shannon. molecular techniques only complement the conventional techniques that remain indispensable for the complete study of fungus communities and provide pure cultures that can be used for further physiological characterization of each isolate. but only identify a few fungus species in samples from complex environments such as composts. Rapid molecular PCR-based techniques now are used to overcome the problems with cultivationbased.56 VC 0. incompleteness of gene databases and low taxonomic resolution of DNA sequences (Anderson et al 2003. The main obstacles stem from inefficient DNA extraction. Aspergillus. Cladosporium. Rank abundance plot of compost (cross) and vermicompost (triangle) fungal communities.79 1. The DCA. VanderGheynst et al 2002. Most of the 66 species common to both composts belong to the Acremonium. Bridge et al 2003. The differences in the qualitative and quantitative composition of the mycoflora in C and VC are well represented in the DCA plot. Among the more abundant species in both composts. in fact. also shows that some samples of both composts cannot be separated because they are composed of a similar mycoflora. molecular methods identify most bacteria. many regarded as the most common in composting materials. b. Mann-Whitney test) between the values of diversity indices in C and VC. This finding is of particular interest because both species are potential human and animal pathogens. Simpson indexes). showing both a greater species richness (Margalef index) and a greater evenness (Berger-Parker. either exclusively or preponderantly. we found a substantial presence in VC of Chrysosporium and Scopulariopsis species.28 0. time-consuming techniques that allow only investigation of the cultivable portion of the mycoflora and cannot provide a precise quantitative estimate. Malbranchea.05. the latter also shown by the rank abundance plot. produced by a mesophilic process in a compost.86 0. prevalent during vermicomposting that are conducive to more types of fungi.24 4. In our opinion. as demonstrated by Roberts and collaborators (2002) in a study of an in-vessel compost and by Peters and collaborators (2000) in a study of composting of agricultural substrates.08 8.97 0. All diversity indexes. 1991.01 3. Abundance is the fungal load expressed as CFU/g dwt. Tiunov and Scheu 2000). Smit et al 1999). species that can survive during the preparation and life of the finished product. This substantial load. Filipello Marchisio 2000). Shannon. and greater than in many agricultural soils (Luppi Mosca et al 1976). Several thermotolerant or thermophilic species (Domsch et al 1980) were isolated from both composts.39 0. Employment of a conventional isolation technique results in the identification in both composts of a huge number of species compared with similar studies (Straatsma et al 1994. due to their thermotolerance and/or capacity to degrade a wide range of organic waste (Miller 1996). Moreover. However. might accumulate because thermophilic preconditioning could encourage the development and proliferation of thermotolerant or thermophilic species. enabling them to invade and parasitize cornified tissues (Rip- .73 2. or to a more varied composition of the raw materials and to the mesophilic conditions FIG. Simpson indeces) of fungal communities in compost (C) and vermicompost (VC) C Margalef DMg Berger-Parker 1/d Shannon H Simpson 1/D 18. Berger-Parker.84 1.18 2. Diversity indices (Margalef. 1994a. which frequently demonstrate keratinolytic activity (Filipello Marchisio et al 1986. Most C and VC samples are distinguished in function of the presence of species regarded as typical of each matrix because they are present. Fermor et al 1979.

2.576. of species or morphotypes 7 20 3 98 14 Load % 6 1 1 86 6 Load % 6 4 2 76 12 . axis 2 0. of genera 3 12 — 44 — VC No.ANASTASI ET AL: FUNGAL COMMUNITIES IN COMPOST AND VERMICOMPOST 41 FIG. species common to both composts. Scatterplot of the DCA of 10 samples of compost (circle) and 10 samples of vermicompost (square) along with 194 fungal entities (for species name refer to TABLE II). of species or morphotypes 12 9 2 89 6 No.297). species exclusive of compost. The first two axes are shown (eigenvalues: axis 1 0. TABLE IV. Number of fungal genera and species among different taxonomic groups in compost (C) and vermicompost (VC) and their relative load (%) C No. of genera Zygomycetes Ascomycetes Basidiomycetes Mitosporic fungi (including Ascomycetes in their anamorphic state) Sterile mycelia 3 7 — 37 — No. species exclusive of vermicompost.

Voyron S. Brown GG. Compost Science and Utilization 12:185–191. particularly VC with its significantly lower Fusarium load. Striganova et al 1988). Gallaz L. Anderson IC. Biodiversity PRO. 2002. 1996. On the unreliability of published DNA sequences.42 MYCOLOGIA liminary results show that taxonomic fungal diversity reflects a different metabolic potential (Anastasi et al 2004). Caccavo D. Med Mycol 36: 137–145. Scannerini S. Moreover. How do earthworms affect microfloral and faunal community diversity? Plant and Soil 170: 209–231. These data are supported by the absence of phytotoxicity in these composts shown by the results of seed germination. Mycological control and surveil´ lance of biological waste and compost. Zygomycetes diversity (especially Mortierella spp. however. maintain that their ingestion is impeded by protective chemical barriers. This result contrasts data of Tiunov and Scheu (2000). There is some evidence that they prefer these fungi (Shaw 1992. Version 2. Beffa et al 1998. root elongation and vegetative tests (shoot and root dry weight. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS pon 1982. Mycoflore du compost destine a la culture ´` du champignon de couche. however. Turin. Prosser JI. Varese GC. as already observed by Brown (1995) and Tiunov and Scheu (2000). Filipello Marchisio V. could be caused by different composition of the two composts. Miserere for their assistance in the preparation of the statistics. We are grateful to Prof. Marfenina OE. New Phytol 160:43–48. Since our vermicompost contained animal wastes. Bridge PD. of Mathematics) and Dr. several fungal strains from these composts now are being investigated to test their capability to decolorize several synthetic dyes and degrade some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: naphthalene. 1995. Roch-Susuki R. This too. Rev Mycol 37:14–35. Maraun et al 1998). 1997. Ascomycetes and to a lesser degree. Sacerdote (Dept. Gumowski P. the presence of animal skin. Fungal biodiversity in the air of Turin. 2004. The extent earthworms influence the development of health-threatening fungi. shoot height and other growth parameters) (Caccavo 2002). Lyon PF. Cailleux R. The relationship between earthworms and dematiaceous fungi is uncertain. were more abundant and more varied in vermicompost. Environ Microbiol 5:36–46. These data show the importance of monitoring fungi in compost in order to evaluate its hygienic quality and to establish recommendations on the management of compost by workers and users. Panchal G. can be determined only by comparing identically composed raw materials. Campbell CD. 1973. pyrene and benzo (ghi)perylene in microcosms in order to elucidate their potential application in bioremediation. Sterile (particularly dematiaceous) mycelia prevailed in VC as previously demonstrated by Beffa and collaborators (1998). a functional analysis is needed to highlight potentials and applications. hairs and nails would provide a ready explanation for the greater development of these keratinolytic species. Roberts PJ. Other workers. Filipello Marchisio V. namely the melanin in their hyphal walls (Dash et al 1984. Latge P. Mycopathologia 136:95–102. Characterization of fungal biodiversity in compost and vermicompost. or to preferential grazing by earthworms on fast-growing fungi (such as zygomycetes and mitosporic fungi). Written by Neil McAleece. Dunoyergeindre S. Georgen F. . Another point is the isolation of a low number of potentially phytopathogenic species from both composts. Italy: 123 p. L. 2003. basidiomycetes. Compost markets grow with environmental applications. L. Staib F. Beffa T. Potential bias of fungal 18Sr DNA and internal transcribed spacer polymerase chain reaction primers for estimating fungal biodiversity in soil. 1999. Gut passage stress and the establishment of unfavorable microniches in the compost following the direct and indirect action of earthworms also would explain why the perfect states of Pseudallescheria boydii and Corynascus sepedonium were found only in VC. BioCycle Magazine. Pre- This study was financed by CEBIOVEM (Centro di Eccellenza per la Biosensoristica Tramite l’utilizzo di Organismi Vegetali e Microbici) and by Marcopolo Environmental Group which also supplied the mature composts.) was lower in VC. 2003. Widespread application of these composts as fertilizers can be recommended. rendering them less competitive and conferring an advantage for slower growing K-selected fungi (basidiomycetes and some ascomycetes) (Moody et al 1992). March:43–44. who found the quantitative and qualitative abundance of Chrysosporium species affected detrimentally through earthworms’ digestion. LITERATURE CITED Airaudi D. Spooner BM. and for preparation of quality certificates and correct management practices to safeguard the health of compost workers and users. Anastasi A. This research demonstrates that qualitative and quantitative characterization of a compost’s fungal community is an essential first step for indicating the best fields of application. Alexander R. Odds 1991). 1998. Marfenina and Ischenko 1997. Valutazione della fitotossicita di un am` mendante compostato verde ed un ammendante compostato misto [Doctoral dissertation]. Fisher JL. Along with the systematic characterization of fungal communities in compost.

Izvestija Akademii Nauk Seriya Biologicheskaya 4:504–506. Fungi. Mycol Res 97:321–328. Curetti V. Chang Y. May 6. 1988. 1993. 1983. Jyvaskyla Finland: ISSS. Marfenina OE. 2000. Straatsma G. Trans Br Mycol Soc 50:649– 666. Mycoses 39:141–150. Mobley JR. Bordese C. Leeflang P. 306 p. 1980. Filipello Marchisio V. Analysis of fungal diversity in the wheat rhizosphere by sequencing of cloned PCR-Amplified genes encoding 18S rRNA and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. Paul. Mycopathologia 127:103–115. 2001. Keratinophilic fungi: their role in nature and degradation of keratinic substrates. 842 p. 1991. Community profiling of fungi and bacteria in an in-vessel composter for the NASA advanced life support program. Rigo S. Gams W. Fontana A. StatView. Domsch KH. Selection of microfungal food by six oribatid mite species (Ori- batida. 2000. p 295–310. CRS Press. Eggen T. fungivores and fungal wood webs. Sparling GP. Program and Abstracts of the XI International Colloquium on Soil Zoology. eds. Spencer DM. Ter Braak. Magurran AE. Gut load and turnover of soil. Version 4. .F. Koschinsky S. plant and fungal material by Drawida ` calebi. Acari) from two different beech forests. Olijnsma TW. 205 p. Classifica´ ` tion et cles d’identification generique. Schaefer M. 1999. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:2614– 2621. New York: Marcel Dekker. Cassinelli C. Succession of microbial communities during hot composting as detected by PCR-Single-Strand-Conformation-Polymorphism-Based genetic profiles of Small-Subunit rRNA genes. Sveum P. Wernars K. Tullio V. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation 43:125– 133. Ohio. Schwieger F. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Frankland JC. The microflora of experimental mushroom composts. Odds FC. The Fungal Community. Decontamination of aged creosote polluted soil: the influence of temperature. Ceccanti B. Maraun M. 1988. Giorn Bot Ital 128:395. Eastman BR. Microbiology of Solid Waste. 1998. Soil Biol Biochem 14:609– 611. Ineson P. Chapman and Hall. Ischchenko IA. 1996. France: ´ ´ ´ INRA Editions. 2002. with emphasis on . Medical Mycology: The pathogenic fungi and the pathogenic Actinomycetes. Trytek L. Satpathy B. Garland JL. New York: Plenum Press. Fungi responsible for skin mycoses in Turin (Italy). ‘‘In situ’’ vermicomposting of biological sludges and impacts on soil quality. Dighton J. Kastner M. . 2000. Preve L. Dash MC. Filipello Marchisio V. 1992. Earthworms preference for soil microscopic fungi. Taxonomy of Scytalidium thermophilum. Ross RC. Dei C. p 287–295. an important thermophilic fungus in mushroom compost. 1992. Peters S. eds. . Dirk van Elsas J. Op den Camp HJM. Robinson CH. In: Haimi J. 1990. 1982. p 115–154. Columbus. Potential for penetration of passive barriers to fungal invasion in humans. 1997. The effectiveness of vermicolture in human pathogen reduction for USEPA biosolids stabilization. J Hort Sci 54: 137–147. Micoflora di un terreno orticolo. Lett Appl Microbiol 33:21–25. Behera N. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:930–936. Dispersal of wheatstraw fungi by earthworms. Revista Iberoamericana de Micologia 86–92. Hanlin RT. Measurement of the microbial biomass in composted wheat straw. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. Barlaz MA.) Bainier. Mahro B. de Moraes SG. Migge S. The fungi of wheat straw compost. Pastore GM. The Fungal Spore and Disease initiation in plants and animals. In: Palmisano AC. Samson RA. Wood DA. Paris. 1982. Kiffer E. London. Rippon JW. Fusconi A. 1991. and the possible contribution of the biomass to the nutrition of Agaricus bisporus. Hudson HJ. Illustrated genera of ascomycetes. Minnesota: The American Phytophatological Society. In: Cole GC. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 44:668–675. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1015–1024. St. Microbial degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils affected by the organic matrix of compost. 1986. white rot fungus Pleurotus ostreatus and pretreatment. 1994 a. Compost Science & Utilization 9:38–49. Written by Cajo J. Proceedings of the International Symposium: Composting and Compost Utilization. Luppi Mosca AM. Fusconi A. Anderson TH. Duran N. Smith JF. Compendium of soil fungi. 1979. In: Carroll GC. 1996. Tebbe C. eds. Ecology of thermophilic fungi in mushroom compost. 1999. Stermer AL. Masciandaro G. Pedobiologia 42:232–240. 263 p. . 865 p. Fermor TR. ` Biodecolorization screening of synthetic dyes by four white-rot fungi in a solid medium: possible role of siderophores. 2001. 1997. Roberts MS. eds. Soil Organisms and Soil Health. Mycopathologia 115:113–120. The significance of thermophilic fungi in mushroom compost preparation. 1996. 179 p. Version II for the Apple Macintosh. 1994. 1976. Mycopathologia 94:163–172. Piearce TG. Wicklow DT. Gunadi B. . Allionia 21:13–32. Miller FC. Minussi RC. Moody SA. Kane PN. Fermor TR. Keratinolysis and its morphological expression in hair and nail digestion by Scopulariopsis brevicaulis (Sacc. . Scheu S.ANASTASI ET AL: FUNGAL COMMUNITIES IN COMPOST AND VERMICOMPOST 43 CANOCO 1998. Sci Hort 20: 61–70. Hoch HC. 1994 b. Giannetta A. Glandorf B. Gerrits JPG. Keratinolysis and its morphological expression in hair digestion by airborne fungi. 1967. 1984. Frazier C. 2002. Edwards CA. 8. Pitkanen PL. . Harris PJ. Shaw PJA. Keratinolytic and keratinophilic fungi of childrens’ sandpits in the city of Turin. a tropical earthworm. England: Academic Press. Composting of Municipal Solid Waste and its Components. Klamer M. Morelet M. Smit E. Van Griensven LJLD. Les deuteromycetes. Ecological studies. Rev Ecol Biol Sol 21:387– 393. Keratinolytic and keratinophilic fungi in the soil of Papua New Guinea. Garcia C. 7.

Crow SA. A simple method to estimate the biomass of thermophilic fungi in composts. J Med Veterin Mycol 32:277– 286. 424 p. Trevors JT. Pantusa S. In: Michel FC. Wellington EMH. Price DL. Nappi P. Marshall MN. Appl Environm Microbiol 60:454–458. Dooley TM. Analisi merceologica dei rifiuti. von Arx JA. Piccone G. van der Gheynst JS. Accotto E. Woychuk W. 1988. Regione Piemonte. biologiche e microbiologiche. Ajello L. eds. 1981. Applied Soil Ecology 14:17– 26. Emmaus. The fungi in soil. Collana ambiente 6. Belfiore G. p 1–187. fisiche. Hoitink HAJ. New York: Marcel Dekker. Simmons RB. Biotechnology Techniques 5:421–426. 2000. Modern Soil Microbiology. litter and casts of Lumbricus terrestris L. Scheu S. Cramer. eds. Ando M. Rynk R. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Composting and Compost Utilization. Marfenina OE. Determinazioni chimiche. Mycologia 77:587–593. Gregor T. 1997. 1998. Scytalidium thermophilum and growth stimulation of Agaricus bisporus mycelium. Some aspects of the effect of earthworms on soil fungi. . Microfungal communities in soil. Thorn G. Summerbell RC. Barberis R. Striganova BR. 1994. Inc. Fung D. Assessorato Ambiente. The genera of fungi sporulating in pure culture. Noble J. The influence of process management and microbial community structure on the cultivation of a biological control agent in compost. Staib F. In: van Elsas JD. Household hyphomycetes and other indoor fungi. Wiegant WM.44 MYCOLOGIA a laboratory esperiment. Trombetta A. Tarlo SM. Tiunov AV. 1985. The staining of filamentous fungi with diazonium blue B. 2002. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk Seriya Biologicheskaya 5:715– 719. Vaduz. 1992. Germany: J. Pennsylvania: JG Press. CD ROM. Ponomarenko VA. (Lumbricidae): . Metodi di analisi dei compost. Ahearn DG.