Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

Core Stability CHAPTER

11
I n recent years an understanding of the concept
of core stability has changed the way in which we
rehabilitate our patients. We have chosen to use the
performance-enhancing program for various lumbar
spine and musculoskeletal injuries.
The ‘core’ has been described as a box with the
term ‘core stability’ in this book but there are many abdominals in the front, paraspinals and gluteals in
other interchangeable terms (Table 11.1). the back, diaphragm as the roof, pelvic floor and hip
All these terms are a description of the muscular girdle musculature as the bottom, and hip abductors
control required around the lumbopelvic–hip region and rotators laterally.2 All these muscles have direct or
to maintain functional stability. Particular atten- indirect attachments to the extensive thoracolumbar
tion has been paid to the core because it serves as a fascia and spinal column, which connect the upper
muscular corset that works as a unit to stabilize the and lower limbs.
body and spine with and without limb movement. In Stability of the lumbar spine involves both pas-
short, the core serves as the center of the functional sive stiffness, through the osseous and ligamentous
kinetic chain. The core has been referred to as the structures, and active stiffness, through muscles.
‘powerhouse’, the foundation or engine of all limb A bare spine, without muscles attached, is unable to
movement. All movements are generated from the bear much of a compressive load.3, 4 Spinal instability
core and translated to the extremities. occurs when either of these components is disturbed.
We use the term ‘stability’ rather than ‘strength’ Gross instability is true displacement of vertebrae,
because strength is just one component of the dynamic such as with traumatic disruption of two out of three
stability required. Dynamic stabilization refers to the vertebrae. On the other hand, functional instability
ability to utilize strength and endurance in a functional is defined as a relative increased range of the neutral
manner through all planes of motion and action zone (the range in which internal resistance from
despite changes in the centre of gravity.1 A comprehen- active muscular control is minimal).5 Active stiff-
sive strengthening or facilitation of these core muscles ness or stability can be achieved through muscular
has been advocated as a preventive, rehabilitative and co-contraction, akin to tightening the guys of a tent
to unload the center pole (Fig. 11.1).6
A major advance in our understanding of how
muscles contribute to lumbar stabilization came from
Table 11.1 Terms used to describe core stability recognizing the difference between local and global
Lumbar/lumbopelvic stabilization muscles. Global (dynamic, phasic) muscles are the
Dynamic stabilization large, torque-producing muscles, such as the rectus
Motor control abdominis, external oblique and the thoracic part
Neuromuscular training of lumbar iliocostalis, which link the pelvis to the
Neutral spine control thoracic cage and provide general trunk stabilization
Muscular fusion as well as movement.
Trunk stabilization Local (postural, tonic) muscles are those that attach
Core strengthening directly to the lumbar vertebrae and are responsible for

158 B R U K N E R A N D K H A N , C L I N I C A L S P O R TS M E D I C I N E 3 E , M c G R AW- H I L L AU S T R A L I A 2 0 0 6

Brukner-A-07_12.indd 158 1/5/06 11:48:28 AM


CHAPTER 11 CORE STABILITY 11

providing segmental stability and directly controlling


the lumbar segments during movement. These muscles
5-' 5-'
include lumbar multifidus, psoas major, quadratus
BCEPNJOBMT BCEPNJOBMT
lumborum, the lumbar parts of iliocostalis and longis-
simus, transversus abdominis, the diaphragm and the
posterior fibers of internal oblique (Fig. 11.2).
Whereas previously the major emphasis in reha-
bilitation has been to strengthen the global muscles
TQJOF
(e.g. the use of sit-ups as a treatment for low back
pain), we now understand that both groups of muscles
must be working efficiently. We have also come to
Figure 11.1 Active stability is achieved through
realize that strength is not the only, nor indeed the
muscular co-contraction via the thoracolumbar fascia
most important, quality of the muscle. Muscle acti-
(TLF). This is similar to the stability imparted by the
vation and endurance are probably more important
guys of a tent ADAPTED FROM PORTERFIELD 6

than strength and any rehabilitation program should


reflect this.

TVQFSmDJBMSFDUVT
EFFQSFDUVT TIFBUI
TIFBUI
SFDUVT
BCEPNJOJT GBTDJB
MJOFBBMCB
USBOTWFSTBMJT

FYUFSOBMPCMJRVF
BCEPNJOBM
DBWJUZ

JOUFSOBMPCMJRVF

USBOTWFSTVT PSHBOT
BCEPNJOJT

MVNCBS
RVBESBUVT WFSUFCSBM
MVNCPSVN DPMVNO

MBUJTTJNVT
EPSTJ

MPOHJTTJNVT QTPBT
TFSSBUVT
JMJPDPTUBMJT QPTUFSJPS TQJOBMJT
MVNCBS JOGFSJPS
NVMUJmEVT

QPTUFSJPSMBZFSPG
UIPSBDPMVNCBSGBTDJB

Figure 11.2 Cross-sectional anatomy of the lumbar spine

B R U K N E R A N D K H A N , C L I N I C A L S P O R TS M E D I C I N E 3 E , M c G R AW- H I L L AU S T R A L I A 2 0 0 6 159

Brukner-A-07_12.indd 159 1/5/06 11:48:30 AM

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi