Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

Brain & Development xxx (2015) xxx–xxx

www.elsevier.com/locate/braindev

Original article

Misdiagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease as epileptic


seizures in children
Ays e Kaç
Kac¸ar
ar Bay ram a, Mehmet Canpolat a,  Neslihan Karaca
Bayram Karacabey b, Hakan Gumus a,
Kumandas a, Selim Doğ
Sefer Kumandas anay c, Duran Arslan b, Hü
Dog˘anay Hu¨ seyin Per a, ⇑

a
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Erciyes University, Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey
b
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Erciyes University, Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey
c
Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, Erciyes University, Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey

Received 14 May 2015; received in revised form 15 August 2015; accepted 18 September 2015

Abstract

Background:  Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can mimic epileptic seizure, and may be misdiagnosed as epilepsy. On the
other hand, GERD can be more commonly seen in children with neurological disorders such as cerebral palsy (CP); this co-
incidence may complicate the management of patients by mimicking refractory seizures.
Objective:  The purpose of our study was to evaluate the clinical features, definite diagnoses and treatment approaches of the
patients with clinically suspected GERD who were referred to the division of pediatric neurology with a suspected diagnosis of 
epileptic seizure. We also aimed to investigate the occurrence of GERD in children with epilepsy and/or CP.
Methods:  Fifty-seven children who had a final diagnosis of GERD but were initially suspected of having epileptic seizures were
assessed prospectively.
Results:  All patients were assigned to 3 groups according to definite diagnoses as follows: patients with only GERD who were
misdiagnosed as having epileptic seizure (group 1:  n  = 16; 28.1%), those with comorbidity of epilepsy and GERD (group 2:  n  = 21;
36.8%), and those with the coexistence of GERD with epilepsy and CP (group 3: n = 20; 35.1%). Five patients (8.8%) did not
respond to anti-reflux treatment and laparoscopic reflux surgery was performed. The positive effect of GERD therapy on paroxys-
mal nonepileptic events was observed in 51/57 (89.5%) patients.
Conclusions:  GERD is one of the important causes of paroxysmal nonepileptic events. In addition, GERD must be kept in mind
at the initial diagnosis and also in the long-term management of patients with neurological disorders such as epilepsy and CP.
  2015 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Japanese Society of Child Neurology.

Keywords:   Children; Epileptic seizure; Gastroesophageal reflux disease; Misdiagnosis; Paroxysmal nonepileptic events

1. Introduction

Corresponding author at: Erciyes University, Faculty of Medicine,
Department
Department of Pediatrics,
Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric
Pediatric Neurology, 38039,
Melikgazi, Kayseri, Turkey. Tel.: +90 (352) 2076666; fax: +90 (352) Paroxysmal nonepileptic events (PNEs) are charac-
4375825. terized by seizure
seizure like behaviors without concomitant
concomitant
E-mail
E-mail addr
addresse s:   draysebayram@gmail.com   (A.K.
esses: (A.K. Bayram)
Bayram),, ictal EEG changes. They may occur at all ages in child-
drmehmetcanpolat@gmail.com   (M. Canpolat),
Canpolat),   dr.neslihan@yahoo.
com   (N. Karaca
Karacabeybey),
),   hakgumus33@yahoo.com   (H. (H. Gumu
Gumus)
s),,
hood. Clinical experience and a detailed history of the
skumandas@hotmail.com (S.
skumandas@hotmail.com  (S. Kumandas), 
Kumandas),   selimdoganay@gmail.com patients usually lead to a correct diagnosis, and which
(S. Doğ
Dog˘anay),
anay), duran@erciyes.edu.tr
 duran@erciyes.edu.tr (D.
 (D. Arslan), huseyinper@yahoo.
Arslan),  huseyinper@yahoo. is confirmed by diagnostic tests [1,2]
tests  [1,2].. However, the accu-
com (H.
com  (H. Per).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.b
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.braindev.201
raindev.2015.09.009
5.09.009
0387-7604/    2015 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Japanese Society of Child Neurology.

Please cite this article in press as: Bayram AK et al. Misdiagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease as epileptic seizures in children. Brain Dev
2 A.K. Bayram et al./ Brain & Development xxx (2015) xxx–xxx

rate diagnosis of PNEs in children is one of the most for GERD. GERD was diagnosed on the basis of clini-
common clinical problems faced by pediatricians. Misdi- cal history and symptoms; it was also confirmed by at
agnosis of epilepsy and unnecessary treatment with least one diagnostic test. The diagnostic tests for GERD
antiepileptic drugs are common in these patients. The included barium radiography, 24-h ambulatory esopha-
frequencies of PNEs in pediatric patients are reported geal manometry, gastroesophageal scintigraphy, and
to range from 3.5% to 39% at epilepsy referral centers upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The diagnostic proce-
[2–4]. dures were evaluated by the pediatric gastroenterolo-
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a diges- gists. Acid reflux episode was defined as a pH < 4 in
tive disorder that can cause many different symptoms, the esophagus. Abnormal parameters of esophageal
and some symptoms of GERD may be associated with pH monitoring included the number of reflux episodes
PNEs. GERD can cause laryngospasm, bradycardia, lasting >5 min, and the percent total time when the
and apneic episodes in infants, which might be mistaken pH in the distal esophagus is <4.0. The test was consid-
as epileptic seizures   [4–7]. The diagnosis of GERD is ered positive when the percent total time of the pH in
based on clinical history, symptoms and physical exam- the distal esophagus was greater than 6.3%, 1.2% and
ination. The application of further diagnostic tests 4.2% on upright position, recumbent position, and total
including barium contrast radiography, 24-h ambula- score, respectively. Gastroesophageal scintigraphy was
tory esophageal manometry, gastroesophageal scintigra- performed in patients with clinically or radiologically
phy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and empiric trial suspected delayed gastric emptying.
of acid suppression are conducted to confirm the diag- Patients were assigned to one of the following three
nosis [8,9]. The purposes of GERD therapy in children groups according to definite diagnoses: patients with a
are relief of symptoms, the healing of tissue injuries final diagnosis of GERD who were initially referred with
and the prevention of growth retardation. The main a suspected diagnosis of epilepsy were categorized as
treatment options are lifestyle changes including postu- group I; children with comorbidity of epilepsy and
ral and nutritional suggestions, drug therapy such as GERD were defined as group II; and those with the
proton pump inhibitors and histamine H2-receptor coexistence of GERD, epilepsy, and cerebral palsy were
antagonists, and reflux surgery [7–10]. defined as group III.
In this study, we evaluated the clinical features, defi-
nite diagnoses and treatment approaches of the children  2.1. Statistical analysis
with clinically suspected GERD who were referred to
our division of pediatric neurology with a suspected All statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS
diagnosis of epileptic seizure. We also aimed to evaluate for Windows version 22.0 software (SPSS, Inc, Chicago,
the impact of GERD in children with epilepsy, whether IL, USA). Continuous variables were presented as mean
with or without cerebral palsy. ± standard deviation. Pearson’s chi-square test was used
to evaluate qualitative variables. Nonparametric statisti-
2. Methods cal data were assessed by using the Kruskal–Wallis test.
When a significant result was obtained, the Mann– 
The study protocol was approved by Erciyes Univer- Whitney U   test with Bonferroni’s correction was used
sity Local Ethics Committee (protocol # 96681246/195). for post hoc comparisons. A p  value <0.05 was consid-
Informed consent was obtained before the study from ered as statistically significant.
the parents or legal guardians of the all patients. All
children with a final diagnosis of GERD who were ini- 3. Results
tially referred with a suspected diagnosis of epileptic sei-
zure were included to study. All enrolled children were The study population included 57 patients (27 boys
prospectively evaluated over a three-year period. and 30 girls). The mean age at diagnosis of GERD
Patients with typical GERD symptoms without was 40.9 ± 44.0 months (age range: 3 months–17 years).
nonepileptic events, those with previously diagnosed Average follow-up duration was 18.2 ± 7.7 months. The
GERD, and patients referred with a diagnosis of other distributions of patients according to definite diagnosis
neurological diseases except for a suspected diagnosis were as follows 16 patients (28.1%) in group I, 21
of epileptic seizure were excluded. All patients were patients (36.8%) in group II, and 20 patients (35.1%)
assessed by two experienced pediatric neurologists in in group III.
terms of detailed medical history, clinical symptoms, The medical history of the study population revealed
physical examination, neurologic evaluation, EEG, bio- premature birth in 9 patients (15.8%), hypoxic ischemic
chemical tests, and radiologic studies. Video-EEG mon- encephalopathy in 28 patients (49.1%), and febrile sei-
itoring and brain MRI were performed in patients if  zures in 8 patients (14.0%). The clinical presentations
considered medically necessary. After the patients were of PNEs at admission were head and neck extension in
neurologically assessed, they underwent investigation 40 patients (70.2%), irritability in 30 patients (52.6%),

Please cite this article in press as: Bayram AK et al. Misdiagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease as epileptic seizures in children. Brain Dev
A.K. Bayram et al. / Brain & Development xxx (2015) xxx–xxx 3

head and eye deviation in 22 patients (38.6%), flexor (8.8%) did not respond to medical GERD therapy,
and/or extensor muscle contractions of upper limb in therefore laparoscopic reflux surgery was performed.
21 patients (36.8%), sleep disturbances including Oral Fe supplementation was given to all patients with
difficulty initiating sleep, frequent night awakenings iron deficiency anemia. PNEs were improved after
and restless sleep in 11 patients (19.3%), lip licking/ treatment for GERD in 51/57 patients (89.5%). Sandifer
swallowing in 8 patients (14.0%), weakness in 6 patients syndrome, flexor spasms, head drop, and myoclonus
(10.5%), Sandifer syndrome in 8 patients (14.0%), flexor were completely resolved after treatment for GERD.
spasms in 2 patients (3.5%), head drop in 2 patients The rates of improvement for other PNEs were as
(3.5%), myoclonus in 2 patients (3.5%), and torticollis follows: head and neck extension 33/40 patients
in 1 patients (1.8%) (Table 1). Among these patients, (82.5%), irritability 25/30 patients (83.3%), head and
flexor spasms were similar to infantile spasms (Video eye deviation 18/22 patients (81.8%), flexor and/or
1), head drop mimicked atonic seizure (Video 2), and extensor muscle contractions of upper limb 19/21
myoclonus resembled myoclonic seizure due to its patients (90.5%), sleep disturbances including difficulty
similar appearance. initiating sleep, frequent night awakenings and restless
PNEs were associated with eating in 9 patients sleep 8/11 patients (72.7%), lip licking/swallowing 6/8
(15.8%). Iron deficiency was observed in 20 patients patients (75.0%), weakness 5/6 patients (83.3%)
(35.1%). There was no statistically significant difference (Fig. 1). The average time for improvement of PNEs
in iron deficiency anemia among the all groups after treatment for GERD was 28.0 ± 2.5 days. There
( p = 0.124). Fifty patients (87.7%) were receiving was no significant difference among the groups in terms
antiepileptic drug therapy at admission. In these fifty of the average time of PNE improvement ( p = 0.226).
patients, the number of receiving antiepileptic drugs In the overall study population, seven patients
for each patient ranged from 1 to 5 with a mean number (12.3%) were diagnosed with GERD without starting
of 2.0 ± 1.3 at admission. antiepileptic therapy; the antiepileptic drug therapy
The diagnosis of GERD was confirmed by using bar- was ceased in 9 patients (15.8%); the number of 
ium radiography of the esophagus–stomach–duodenum, antiepileptic drugs was reduced in 5 patients (8.8%);
24-h esophageal pH monitoring, upper gastrointestinal and PNEs improved without additional antiepileptic
endoscopy, and multiple diagnostic tests in 34 (59.6%), therapy in 30 patients (52.6%) (Table 2).
13 (22.8%), 3 (5.3%), and 7 (12.3%) patients, respec- In group I, the diagnosis of GERD was made without
tively. Gastroesophageal scintigraphies were positive in starting antiepileptic drug therapy in 7/16 patients
7 patients (12.3%) who had chronic and refractory (43.7%), while antiepileptic drugs were ceased in 9/16
respiratory symptoms. patients (56.3%) after treatment for GERD. The
All patients were treated with proton pump inhibitors response rate to the GERD therapy was 100%.
or histamine-2 blockers, as well as postural and nutri- The mean age at diagnosis was 9.8 ± 5.8 months (age
tional suggestions, for at least 6 months. Five patients range: 3–20 months). The mean age at diagnosis was

Table 1
Main demographic features and distribution to the groups of different paroxysmal nonepileptic events in the patients with GERD.
n Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Age (months) Gender p  Valuea
(n = 16) (n = 21) (n = 20)
Head and neck extension 40 (70.2%) 10 15 15 41.8 ± 40.9 F:21, M:19 0.709b
Irritability 30 (52.6%) 10 7 13 42.6 ± 52.8 F:17, M:13 0.830b
Head and eye deviation 22 (38.6%) 5 7 10 41.3 ± 47.0 F:11, M:11 0.426b
Upper limb muscle 21 (36.8%) 9 7 5 33.5 ± 31.9 F:13, M:8 0.283b
contractions
Sleep disturbance 11 (19.3%) 1 2 8 33.5 ± 31.9 F:13, M:8 0.014b
Lip licking/swallowing 8 (14.0%) 3 4 1 28.5 ± 16.5 F:4, M:4 0.352b
Weakness 6 (10.5%) 4 2 0 28.2 ± 45.3 F:5, M:1 0.204b
Sandifer syndrome 8 (14.0%) 8 0 0 30.4 ± 16.2 F:5, M:3 <0.001b
Flexor spasms 2 (3.5%) 1 0 1 57.5 ± 71.4 F:1, M:1 0.667b
Head drop 2 (3.5%) 0 0 2 90.0 ± 42.4 F:0, M:2 0.147b
Myoclonus 2 (3.5%) 1 1 0 6.0 ± 2.8 F:1, M:1 0.554b
Torticollis 1 (1.8%) 0 1 0 11 F:1 0.418b
Abbreviations: n , number of patients; F, female; M, male.
Variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
Values within parenthesis are presented as percentage.
a
Level of significance p  < 0.05.
b
Pearson’s chi-square test.

Please cite this article in press as: Bayram AK et al. Misdiagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease as epileptic seizures in children. Brain Dev
6 A.K. Bayram et al./ Brain & Development xxx (2015) xxx–xxx

involved in patient care, including the process of proce- conditions in pediatric patients, with comparison between his-
dure and routine clinical follow-up. HP, and AKB tamine-2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors. Curr
Medical Res Opin 2009;25:2703–9.
performed the literature review and wrote the manu- [8] van der Pol RJ, Smits MJ, Venmans L, Boluyt N, Benninga MA,
script. AKB also made statistical analysis. DA, HG Tabbers MM. Diagnostic accuracy of tests in pediatric gastroe-
and SK also made helpful suggestions to improve the sophageal reflux disease. J Pediatr 2013;162(983–7):e1–4.
manuscript. [9]   Ferreira CT, de Carvalho E, Sdepanian VL, de Morais MB,
Vieira MC, Silva LR. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: exagger-
ations, evidence and clinical practice. J Pediatr (Rio J)
Funding
2014;90:105–18.
[10]  Vandenplas Y, Rudolph CD, Di Lorenzo C, Hassall E, Liptak G,
The authors received no financial support for the Mazur L, et al. Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux clinical practice
research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. guidelines: joint recommendations of the North American Society
for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition
(NASPGHAN) and the European Society for Pediatric Gas-
Ethical approval
troenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). J Pediatr
Gastroenterol Nutr 2009;49:498–547.
Informed consent was obtained from all the parents [11]   Cafarotti A, Bascietto C, Salvatore R, Breda L, Chiarelli F,
or legal guardians of the children included. This study Piernicola P. A 6-month-old boy with uncontrollable dystonic
was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of Erciyes posture of the neck. Sandifer syndrome. Pediatr Ann
2014;43:17–9.
University (protocol # 96681246/195). [12]   Kabakus N, Kurt A. Sandifer Syndrome: a continuing problem of 

misdiagnosis. Pediatr Int 2006;48:622–5.


[13]  Bray PF, Herbst JJ, Johnson DG, Book LS, Ziter FA, Condon
Acknowledgement VR. Childhood gastroesophageal reflux. Neurologic and psychi-
atric syndromes mimicked. JAMA 1977;237:1342–5.
[14]   Donat JF, Wright FS. Clinical imitators of infantile spasms. J
We would like to thank all patients and families for Child Neurol 1992;7:395–9.
their participation in this study. [15]   Karatas AF, Miller EG, Miller F, Dabney KW, Bachrach S,
Connor J, et al. Cerebral palsy patients discovered dead during
Appendix A. Supplementary data sleep: experience from a comprehensive tertiary pediatric center. J
Pediatr Rehabil Med 2013;6:225–31.
[16] Del Giudice E, Staiano A, Capano G, Romano A, Florimonte L,
Supplementary data associated with this article can Miele E, et al. Gastrointestinal manifestations in children with
be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10. cerebral palsy. Brain Dev 1999;21:307–11.
1016/j.braindev.2015.09.009. [17]  Ghaem M, Armstrong KL, Trocki O, Cleghorn GJ, Patrick MK,
Shepherd RW. The sleep patterns of infants and young children
References with gastro-oesophageal reflux. J Paediatr Child Health
1998;34:160–3.
[18]   Arad-Cohen N, Cohen A, Tirosh E. The relationship between
[1]   DiMario Jr FJ. Paroxysmal nonepileptic events of childhood.
gastroesophageal reflux and apnea in infants. J Pediatr
Semin Pediatr Neurol 2006;13:208–21.
2000;137:321–6.
[2]  Obeid M, Mikati MA. Expanding spectrum of paroxysmal events
[19]   Alex N, Thompson JM, Becroft DM, Mitchell EA. Pulmonary
in children: potential mimickers of epilepsy. Pediatr Neurol
aspiration of gastric contents and the sudden infant death
2007;37:309–16.
syndrome. J Paediatr Child Health 2005;41:428–31.
[3]   Uldall P, Alving J, Hansen LK, Kibaek M, Buchholt J. The
[20]   Sweetman LL, Ng YT, Kerrigan JF. Gelastic seizures misdiag-
misdiagnosis of epilepsy in children admitted to a tertiary epilepsy
nosed as gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin Pediatr (Phila)
centre with paroxysmal events. Arch Dis Child 2006;91:219–21.
2007;46:325–8.
[4]  Hindley D, Ali A, Robson C. Diagnoses made in a secondary care
[21]   Auvin S, Hartman AL, Desnous B, Moreau AC, Alberti C,
‘‘fits, faints, and funny turns   clinic. Arch Dis Child

Delanoe C, et al. Diagnosis delay in West syndrome: misdiagnosis
2006;91:214–8.
and consequences. Eur J Pediatr 2012;171:1695–701.
[5]   Orenstein SR, Khan S. Gastroesophageal reflux disease. In:
[22]   Parisi P, Pacchiarotti C, Ferretti A, Bianchi S, Paolino MC,
Stanton BF, Schor NF, St Geme JW, Berhman RE, Kliegman
Barreto M, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease vs. Panayioto-
RM, editors. Nelson textbook of pediatrics. Philadelphia: Pa:
poulos syndrome: an underestimated misdiagnosis in pediatric
Saunders Elsevier; 2011. p. 1266–70 19th ed..
age? Epilepsy Behav 2014;41:6–10.
[6] Nelson SP, Chen EH, Syniar GM, Christoffel KK. Prevalence of 
[23]   Ruigómez A, Wallander MA, Lundborg P, Johansson S,
symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux during childhood: a pedi-
Rodriguez LA. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in children and
atric practice-based survey. Pediatric practice research group.
adolescents in primary care. Scand J Gastroenterol
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:150–4.
2010;45:139–46.
[7]   Kothari S, Nelson SP, Wu EQ, Beaulieu N, McHale JM,
Dabbous OH. Healthcare costs of GERD and acid-related

Please cite this article in press as: Bayram AK et al. Misdiagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease as epileptic seizures in children. Brain Dev

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi