Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
A bailment is the delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose upon a
contract that they shall be returned OR otherwise disposed off according to the direction
of the person delivering them, after the purpose has been accomplished.
The person delivering the goods is called as the ‘Bailor’ and the person to whom the goods
are delivered is called as the ‘Bailee’. The Contract is called as ‘bailment’.
Bailment therefore means the delivery OR handing over of goods. Change of possession of
goods for a specific purpose is the essence of Bailment.
Example :
A, delivers a piece of cloth to a tailor B, to be stitched into a suit. This would amount to
bailment.
Essentials of Bailment:
1) A Contract :
The delivery of goods should be upon a contract between the bailor and bailee. However a
person already in possession may become a bailee by a subsequent agreement.
2) Delivery of goods and change of possession :
Change of possession of goods by delivery from one person to another is essential. However
this must be for a temperory period. Mere change of custody of the goods without parting
with its possession does not constitute bailment.
Example :
A servant in custody of goods of his master ( not bailment )
This is not bailment as the right of possession of goods still is with the master.
The delivery of goods may be actual OR constructive. Actual delivery may be handing over
of the goods by the bailor.
Constructive delivery may be by doing anything that has the effect of putting the
possession of the goods in the hands of the bailee. ( eg. Handing over the keys of a car )
3) Specific purpose :
The delivery of goods in bailment must be for a specific purpose. When the purpose is
accomplished they shall be returned OR disposed off according to the direction of the
bailor.
4) Movable property :
The bailment can only be in respect of movable property. Money is not a movable property
and as such there can be no bailment in respect of money.
5) Return of the specific goods :
After the purpose for which the goods had been bailed has been accomplished the bailee
must return the goods either to the bailor OR to someone according to the direction of the
bailor.
The contract of Indemnity is a contract by which one party promises to save the other
party from any loss cause to him by the conduct of the promissor himself OR by any
other person[Section 124]:
A person who promises to make good the loss
i.e. the promissor is called as the indemnifier & the person whose loss is made good is
called as the indemnifier holder.
To indemnify therefore means to save from the loss in respect of which the indemnity has
been given. As the happening of the loss is the contingency on which the liability of the
indemnifier depends.
Indemnity contracts are consider as a general class of contingent contract & therefore
has to satisfy all the essentials of a valid contract.
A contract of indemnity may be expressed OR implied from the circumstances of the
case.
Eg :
A contract of assurance other than life insurance is a type of indemnity contract
Essential of indemnity contract :
1) The contract of indemnity must contain all the essential of a valid contract
2) The promissor OR the indemnity holder must have suffered a loss. Under the English
law indemnity mean a promise to save a person harmless from the consequences of an
act. It includes instances where a person suffers a loss on acting under an instruction
of a person who is not authorized to give instruction.
Rights of an indemnity holder :
1) A indemnity holder when sued is entitle to recover from the indemnifier all
damages which he may be compelled to pay in respect of any matter to which the
promise to indemnify applies
2) All costs that the indemnity holder may be compelled to pay in any suit in instituting
OR defending it can be claimed from the indemnifier provided that the indemnity
holder did not contradict the orders of the promissor & has acted prudently.
3) All sums that the indemnity holder may have paid under the terms of any compromise
of any suit is recoverable from the indemnifier.
4) An indemnity holder can sue the indemnifier for the specific performance of the
contract of indemnity if he incurs liability that is covered by the contract of
indemnity.
A guarantee that extends to a series of transaction between the creditor and the principal
debtor is called as a Continuing guarantee. A guarantee may cover a single OR a specific
transaction OR a series (separate and distinct) of transaction.
A guarantee that covers a single transaction is called as SINGLE GUARANTEE and that which
covers a series of transaction is called as CONTINUING GUARANTEE.
In a single guarantee the liability of the surety exists only for a single or a specific
transaction. In Continuing guarantee the liability is not restricted to a single transaction but
it extends to a series of transaction.
Whether a guarantee is single or continuing depends upon the intention of the parties,
language of the guarantee and the position of the parties at the time the instrument was
written.
A guarantee for payment of a certain sum of money, in installments, within a definite time is
not a continuing guarantee.
Revocation of Continuing Guarantee:
1. By notice [Sec. 130]
The surety may at any time revoke a Continuing guarantee by notice to the creditor.
A notice of revocation by the surety to the creditor is sufficient to revoke the Continuing
guarantee as to all future transactions. Notice by the surety must be clearly and sufficiently
given. The liability of the surety ceases from the day of the service of the notice upon the
creditor.
A single guarantee cannot be revoked by notice if the liability has already arisen.
2. By death of Surety [Sec. 131]:
In the absence of a contract to the contrary the death of the surety operates as a revocation
of the continuing guarantee as regards the future transaction.
3. By discharge of the Surety ;
A Continuing guarantee is also revoked when the surety is discharged in any one of the
following ways:
a) By variance OR variation in the terms of the contract [Sec. 133]:
Any variation made, without the consent of the surety, in the terms of contract between
the Creditor and Principal debtor discharges the surety in respect of all future transactions.
i.e. any future transaction after the date of variance.
This is based on the principle that there is also a contract between the surety and the
principal debtor and the surety and creditor which may be effected because of the variation.
b) By release OR discharge of the principal debtor [sec. 134] :
The surety is discharged by any contract between the creditor and the Principal debtor by
which the principal debtor is discharged of his liabilities OR when the principal debtor is
discharged by an act of the creditor the consequence of which discharges the principal
debtor.
Eg. A contracts to build a house for B for a fixed price within a fixed time under the
condition that B would supply the raw material for construction. C guarantees the
performance of A. B fails to supply the raw materials on time. C is discharged of his liability.
c) By the creditor compounding with the principal debtor [Sec. 135] :
A contract between the creditor and the principal debtor by which the creditor makes a
compromise with the principal debtor or gives the principal debtor time to sue will discharge
the surety unless he has consented to the compromise.
d) By misrepresentation :
Where, a creditor misrepresents to the surety regarding the material facts, the guarantee is
invalid and the surety is discharged.
e) By the creditors act OR omission impairing the surety’s eventual remedy [Sec. 139] :
If the creditor does any act which is inconsistent with the rights of the surety OR omits to
do any act which he is bound to do towards the surety and which takes away the eventual
remedy of the surety against the principal debtor then the surety is discharged of his
liabilities.
Eg: B contracts to build a ship for C for a certain sum of money to be paid in installments as
the work reaches different stages. A guarantees the performance of B. C without the
knowledge of A prepays the last 2 installments to B. C is discharged of his liability because of
the prepayment.
f) By the concealment of material facts [Sec. 143] :
In case the creditor or the principal debtor, conceal facts, which are material to the
contract, from the surety the surety is discharged of his liability.
g) By the failure of the co-surety to join [ Sec. 144] :
Failure on the part of a person to join the contract as a co-surety, where the first surety had
given the guarantee under the expressed condition that the creditor shall not act upon the
guarantee unless the other person is joined as a co-surety, will discharge the surety of his
liability.
A surety is not discharged in the following cases:
a) When an agreement is made by the creditor with a third party to give time to the principal
debtor.
Eg.: A promised B to repay certain amount within a fixed period. C has guaranteed the
performance of B. A contracts with D whereby he agrees to give extra time for repayment to
D. In such a case C will not be released of his liabilities as a surety.
b) Creditors forbearance to sue the Principal debtor [Sec. 137] :
Mere forbearance on the part of the creditor to sue the principal debtor OR to enforce any
remedy against him does not in the absence of a contract to the contrary, discharge the
surety.
Eg: B owes C a debt guaranteed by A. The debt becomes payable but C does not sue B for a
year after the default. This will not discharge the surety of his liability.
c) By release of one of the Co-sureties. [Sec. 138]:
When two or more persons guarantee the performance of a debt they are called as joint co-
sureties.
When there are co-sureties in a contract of guarantee the release by the creditor of one of
them does not discharge the others, neither does it discharge the surety so released from
his responsibilities towards the other sureties.
Eg.: A owes C a debt which is guaranteed by 3 sureties S1,S2 and S3. C releases S3 of his
liabilities. S1 and S2 are not released of their liabilities towards C. Though S3 has been
released of his liabilities towards C he is not released of his liabilities towards S1 and S2.
RIGHTS OF A SURETY:
1) Right of Subrogation [Sec 140]:
This is the right of surety against the principal debtor where the guarantee debt has become
due on the default of the principal debtor to perform a guarantee duty has taken place and
the surety is liable to perform. The surety upon the payment OR performance is vested with
all the rights which the creditor had against the principal debtor.
2) Right of Indemnity[Sec. 145]:
The surety has a right of indemnity against the principal debtor i.e. the principal debtor is
bound to make good any loss suffered by the surety on account of the default on the part of
the principal debtor.
3) Right to the benefits of the creditors securities [Sec. 141]:
If the principal debtor has given certain securities in addition to the surety, the surety will
have a right over the securities and if the creditor releases the securities without the
consent of the surety then the surety is released of his liability to the extent of the amount
of the security so released.
4) Right against the co-sureties[Sec 146 & 147]:
Where there are more than one sureties guaranteeing they are liable to share the debt or
equal share of the part that has remained unpaid.
CONTRACT OF AGENCY :
An agent is a person employed to do any act for another OR represent another in dealing with
a third party.
The person for whom such an act is done OR who is represented is called as the Principal and
the person employed OR who represents is called as the Agent. The relation between them is
agency.
An agent therefore brings together his principal and the third party. An agent is bound to
follow the lawful instructions of the Principal.
Essentials of agency:
1) The principal must be competent to contract [Sec 183]:
Any person who has attained the age of majority according to the law to which he is subject
and who is of a sound mind may employ an agent. This means that a minor cannot appoint an
agent as a minor’s contract is void.
2) any person can become an agent [section 184]:
any person can become an agent but no person who has not attended the age of majority &who
is not of a sound mind can become an agent so as to be responsible to the principal according
to the provisions in that behalf.
The section therefore states that even a minor OR a person of an unsound mind as an agent is
not responsible the principal therefore the agent who is a minor OR a person of an unsound
mind can represent the principal before third person & bind the principal by their acts.
The agent does not incur any personal liability. The contract of agency is based on the maxim
“Quit facit alium faut perse” meaning he who acts through others acts himself.
3) no consideration for the creation of agency [section 185]:
Creation of agency:
Agency is created by a contract b / w the principal & the agent in which the principal
authorizes the agent to act on his behalf.
This contractual relation b/w the principal & the agent can take place in any of the following
ways:
1) Agency by agreement [section 186 & 187]:
The agreement can be expressed OR implied.
a) Expressed agreement :
The authority of the agent may be expressed by writing OR orally OR by a simple
agreement.
The agreement is expressed when it is given by words spoken OR written
b) Implied agreement :
An authority is said to be implied when it is inferred from the conduct situation OR the
relation of the parties OR circumstances of the case by the ordinary course of dealings.
2) Agency by necessity [section 189] :
When one is compelled to act as an agent of another without the authority of that other such
an agency is known as agency by necessity.
An agent has an authority in any emergency to do all such acts for the principal for the
purpose of protecting from any loss if the act done is such as would be done by a person of
ordinary prudence in his own case.
Eg:
1) The master of a ship may borrow money to carry out necessary repairs to the ship.
Such an act by the master in the absence of an owner would be binding on the
owner {principal}. He should act in the interest of the parties concerned.
2) An agency is created b/w a husband or wife i.e. a wife may purchase goods which
are necessary and bind the husband for the payment of the same.
3) Agency by estoppel OR holding out [section 237] :
When an agent has without the authority done an act OR has incurred an obligation to a third
person on behalf of his principal the principal is bound by the act OR obligations if he has by
words OR conduct induced the third person to believe that the act OR obligation were within
the scope of the agents authority.
In other words when a principal by his words OR conduct induces a third party to believe that
a certain person is his agent he is precluded from subsequently denying the fact of agency.
Eg:
B a servant of A purchases goods from C on credit for A without the authority of A. later A
pays for the goods. He has induced C to believe that B is his agent and therefore will be
bounded by subsequent purchases made by B from C for A even if they are made without
authority.
4) Agency by operation of law:
In a particular firm a partner is an agent of the other partner and of the partnership for
while dealing with third parties. The act of the partner while carrying on the business of the
firm in the usual way binds the firm and its partners. This is an implied agency created by the
operation of law.
5) Agency by ratification [section 195-200]:
Where a person on behalf of another but without his knowledge does an act OR authority the
other person may elect to ratify OR to disown such an act.
If he ratifies them the same effect will follow as if the act had been done with the previous
authority [section 196]
The ratification may be expressed OR implied by the conduct on whose behalf the act has
been done [section 197]
Eg:
A without the authority buys a good for B. later B sells them to C as his own.
B’s conduct implies a ratification of the purchase made by A.
By ratification the person becomes an agent with retrospective effect i.e. he becomes an
agent from the time he has done the act and not from the time act has been ratified
Ratification would constitute as if the act was done with the previous permission of the
principal.
Rules regarding ratification:
1) A person on behalf of another must do the act.
2) The act must be done without the knowledge OR the authority of the person on whose
behalf the act has been done.
3) The person on whose behalf the act has been done must be legally in existence at the
time of the act.
4) The ratification may be done by expressed terms OR could be implied by the conduct.
5) A person whose knowledge of the facts of the case is materially defective can make no
valid ratification.
6) The principal must be competent to ratify both at the time of the contract i.e. the time
when the act has been done and also at the time of ratification.
7) The ratification must be done within a reasonable time.
8) Ratification must be communicated.
9) Ratification must be of the whole contract and not a part of it.
10) Ratification should no put a third party to damages.
Sub agent:
A sub agent is a person employed by and acting under the control of the original agent in the
business of agency [section 191]
An agent appointed by an original agent would therefore be termed as a sub agent.
The relation of the sub agent to that of the original agent is that of a principal and agent.
As a general rule an agent cannot delegate his authority to another. This is based on the
maxim “delegatus non protest deligare “which means a delegatee cannot delegate i.e. one
who has an authority from another to do an act must do it himself and cannot delegate the
authority to another therefore an agent cannot lawfully appoint another person to perform
the act which he has expressly OR impliedly undertaken to perform personally.
However there are certain exceptions to this rule
i.e. when an agent can appoint another person as an agent to act as a sub agent.
1) A sub agent may be employed by an ordinary custom of the trade.
Eg:
Appointment of sub agents like architects, engineers, lawyers by an agent for the sake
of development of land.
2) From the nature of the agency a sub agent may be employed
Eg:
An agent authorized to find OR defend suits may engage a lawyer {sub agent}.
3) Where unforeseen emergencies arise necessitating OR compelling the agent to appoint
a sub agent it would be allowed.
4) The acts of the sub agent are of purely ministerial nature like an authority to sign .
5) Where circumstances exists to reasonably presume that the parties to the contract
originally intended that the authority would be delegated.
1. Define Bailment. What are its essentials? What are the right and liabilities of a
Bailee/ bailor?
2. What is a contract of Agency? What are the different methods for creation of
an Agency?
3. Define agency. What are its essentials .what are the different ways of
Termination of agency?
4. Define the contract of Guarantee. When is the surety discharged of the liability
Under the provisions of the Indian contract act?
5. What is a ‘Contract of Pledge’? What are the rights and liabilities of a pledgee?
6. Define and explain a Contract of Indemnity. What are the rights of an Indemnity
Holder?
Short Notes:
1. Rights of indemnity holder.
2. Contract of Pledge.
3. Termination of Agency
4. Sub-agent
5. Contract of Guarantee
6. Right of lien
7. Continuing Guarantee
8. Rights of Surety
9. Rules of ratification / agency by ratification
10. Rights of an Agent
11. Duties and liabilities of the Principal
12. Duties and liabilities of an Agent
13. Rights of bailer and Bailee
14. Contract of Indemnity
15. Rights of Pledgee.