Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
PII: S2352-4928(19)31039-6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101232
Reference: MTCOMM 101232
Please cite this article as: Liu S, Shi Z, Xing X, Ren X, Zhou Y, Yang Q, Effect of Nb additive
on wear resistance and tensile properties of the hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloy,
Materials Today Communications (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101232
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as
the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the
definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and
review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early
visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be
discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal
pertain.
of
Graphical abstract
ro
-p
re
lP
na
Highlights
The microstructures and phase structures of hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloy with
ur
The tensile strength parallel to the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 was improved by the refinement
effect of Nb, while that vertical to the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 was lowered.
1
Abstract
The effects of Nb additive on wear resistance and tensile properties of the hypereutectic
microstructures and phase structures of the alloys with and without Nb additive were
of
compared by means of optical microscopy (OM) and X-ray diffractometer (XRD). The
ro
wear behaviors were measured by reciprocating wear tests via CSM Tribometer. The
the alloy with Nb additive contains NbC as well as (Fe,Cr)7C3 and γ-Fe. The size of the
lP
primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides in the alloy with Nb additive is obviously smaller than that
na
without Nb additive. The mass loss of the alloy with Nb additive is less than that without
Nb additive. The worn surfaces also indicate that the amount of the cracks on the alloy
ur
surface with Nb additive is less than that without Nb additive. The tensile strength
parallel to the rod-like primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides is larger than that vertical to the
Jo
primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides. The tensile strength parallel to the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3
carbides of the alloy with Nb additive is larger than that without Nb additive, while the
tensile strength vertical to the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides of the alloy is lower than
that without Nb additive. The phase fraction vs. temperature curves of the alloy shows
2
that the alloy with Nb additive preferentially forms NbC and then primary (Fe,Cr)7C3
carbides. The lattice misfit between NbC and (Fe,Cr)7C3 is 2.16%, which proves NbC
can be as the heterogeneous nucleus to refine primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides in the Fe-Cr-
1. Introduction
of
In recent years, the metal based additive manufacture (AM) is one
ro
of the research focuses currently [1]. With excellent wear-resistance, the Fe-Cr-C
carbon, 10~30wt.% chromium) are higher than those of the eutectic and hypoeutectic
na
ones, which is ascribed to the large amount of primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides [6]. The
primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides in hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloy can grow into
ur
rods along the cooling direction [7], namely the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides are vertical
to the hardfacing surface. The anisotropic primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides shows more
Jo
Combined with the eutectic carbides and the ductile eutectic austenite [8, 9], the
3
However, the impact-wear property of the hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloy
may be decreased when the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides are coarse [14-16]. The refined
primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides can dramatically improve the strength and toughness of
the hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloy [17, 18]. So it is attractive to research the
treatment [19, 20], lowering superheat [21], semi-solid process [22] and alloying
of
hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloy, in which, alloying treatment is one of the most
ro
economical and effective methods. X.H. Zhi et al. [23] studied the effect of Ti additive
on hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloy and found that the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3
-p
carbides are effectively refined. They also found that Ce additive can refine the primary
re
(Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides and the impact toughness of the Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloy can be
improved too [24]. X.W. Qi et al. [25] investigated the changes in microstructure and
lP
that the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides are refined and the wear resistance of the
La and Y can refine the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides as well [26, 27].
Cracks often occur on the surface of the hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloy
Jo
research the tensile properties of the hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloy for
improvement of its cracking resistance. However, there are few reports about the
4
In this paper, the effects of Nb additive on wear resistance and tensile properties
and phase structures of the alloys with and without Nb additive were compared. The
wear behaviors and tensile properties were measured. The formation thermodynamics
of NbC and the misfit between NbC and (Fe,Cr)7C3 were calculated. The refinement
mechanism of (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides by NbC was discussed, and the reason that the wear
and tensile properties of the hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloys can be improved
of
by Nb additive was analyzed.
ro
2. Materials and experiments
2.1 Materials
-p
Two hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloys with and without Nb additive were
re
prepared by cladding self-made flux cored wires on low-carbon steel. During cladding,
the open arc welding method was used, which is schematically illustrated in Fig.1.
lP
The optimized parameters of the hardfacing process are listed in Table 1. The
na
substrates were preheated before hardfacing, and welding zone was hammered during
hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloys with and without Nb additive were determined
spectrometer.
Table 2, in which, the alloy without Nb additive is named as No.1 alloy, and that with
5
Table 1 Parameters of hardfacing process.
Cladding
Wire diameter Welding voltage Welding current Welding speed
thickness
(mm) (V) (A) (mm•min-1.)
(mm)
3.2 24~26 200~224 300 4.6~5.0
2.2 Experiments
of
Specimens with dimension of 10mm×10mm×10mm were cut from the
hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloys and then ground by SiC abrasive papers. The
ro
ground specimens were mechanical polished to improve the surface brightness. Then
-p
D/max-2500/PC X-ray diffractometer (XRD) was used to detect the phase structures of
the alloys with Cu Kα radiation (20-120°, 1°/s). The microstructures of the alloys were
re
observed by Axiovert 200 MAT optical microscopy (OM) after the polished specimens
lP
chemical compositions, the phase fraction vs. temperature curves of the hypereutectic
na
with size 20mm×10mm×10mm were carried out with the CSM Tribometer. In order to
Jo
simulate similar service conditions, the tungsten steel ball (diameter=3mm) was chosen
for the friction pair because its hardness is HRA92, which is dramatically higher than
that of the hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloys (HRA75~80). The wear test is
schematic illustrated as follows. Firstly, the tungsten steel ball was installed on the ball
fixture and then the ball fixture was tightly fixed on the swing arm by the bolt. Secondly,
6
we adjusted balance of the swing arm till the tungsten steel ball just touched the
specimen while did not apply force to the specimen. Thirdly, 5N weight was applied
and then the reciprocating wear test was carried out by the advance and return
movement of the specimen along with the specimen fixture. The velocity of the
specimen fixture was 5cm/s and the length of the worn trace was 10mm. The duration
of wear test was 240min. Then the worn surfaces were observed by Hitachi S3400 field
of
energy spectrum diffraction (EDS). The mass loss of the specimen after wear test was
ro
also weighted. Each group was weighted 5 times.
schematically shown in Fig.2a. The thickness of the specimens is 2mm. Due to the
lP
the tensile tests were divided into two sets. In one set, the direction of the tensile force
was parallel to the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides, which is shown in Fig.2b. In the other
ur
set, the direction of the tensile force was vertical to the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides,
which is shown in Fig.2c. Before the tensile tests, the specimens were ground by SiC
Jo
abrasive papers. The loading rate of the tensile tests was 0.84mm/min. The
scanned by EDS.
3. Experimental results
7
3.1 Phases and microstructures
The XRD patterns of the hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloys are shown in
Fig.3, in which, No.1 alloy mainly consists of (Fe,Cr)7C3 and γ-Fe (austenite), while
shown in Fig.4, in which the brown polygons are the cross-sections of the primary
(Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides. By comparing Fig.4a and Fig.4b, it can be found that primary
of
(Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides in No.2 alloy are effectively refined compared to No.1 alloy. The
ro
statistics data on the area of primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides is displayed in Fig.4c. It is
obvious that the area span of the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides in No.1 alloy is much
The mass loss of the hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloys from the wear test
lP
is shown in Fig.5. The mass loss of the No.2 alloy is 60mg, which is less than that of
na
the No.1 alloy (82mg). It indicates the wear resistance is improved by adding Nb
corresponding element distribution maps are shown in Fig.6. From the worn surface of
Jo
the No.1 alloy in Fig.6a, several cracks up to tens of microns can be seen. With the help
the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides) and blue color represents Fe accumulation (i.e.
austenite), the cracks mainly occur at the joint between primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides
8
and austenite. The worn surface of the No.2 alloy is shown in Fig.6c. Compared with
distribution map is shown in Fig.6d, where the pink color represents Nb accumulation
(i.e. NbC). The comparison of Fig.6b and Fig.6d also proves that (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides
of
No. parallel to primary (Fe,Cr)7C3. vertical to primary (Fe,Cr)7C3.
ro
No.2 340 50
The tensile curves of the hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloys parallel to and
-p
vertical to primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides are shown in Fig.7, and the tensile strengths are
re
listed in Table 3. Because the hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloys are typical brittle
materials, no yielding phenomenon appears in the tensile curves. When the tensile
lP
direction is parallel to the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides, it can be seen that the tensile
strength of the No,2 alloy is 340MPa, which is almost twice higher than that of No.1
na
alloy (150 MPa). When the tensile direction is vertical to the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3
ur
carbides. It is worth noting that the tensile strength of the No.2 alloy is 50MPa, which
much lower than that of the No.1 alloy (120 MPa). It indicates that the tensile strength
Jo
strongly depends on the orientation of the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides. The tensile
strength parallel to the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides is much higher than that vertical to
9
hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloys after tensing parallel to the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3
carbides are shown in Fig.8. It can be seen from Fig.8a and Fig.8c that the
characteristics. Based on the element distribution maps in Fig.8b and Fig.8d, it can be
deduced that the cleavage surfaces are occurred on primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides.
Together with the fact that the cleavage surfaces are vertical to the c-axis of the primary
(Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides, it can be known that the cleavage surfaces of the primary
of
(Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides are close-packed (0001) planes. The right lower corner in Fig.8c is
ro
the magnification of the dashed box. According to the element distribution map in
Fig.8d, the dark area in the dashed box is NbC. It can be observed that NbC also presents
-p
cleavage characteristics. In addition, NbC is tightly combined with primary (Fe,Cr)7C3
re
carbides during tensing, which means the cohesion between NbC and (Fe,Cr)7C3 is
strong.
lP
hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloys after tensing vertical to the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3
carbides is shown in Fig.9. The cleavage surfaces of primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides are
ur
close-packed (0001) planes, which are shown in Fig.8. While it can be seen in Fig.9
that even more smooth fractographies are emerged, which means the
Jo
(Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides. According to Fig.9d, the dark particles in Fig.9c are NbC. Due to
some NbC particles are enclosed within primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides, there is
considerable difference in the size of them Fig.9c. The right lower corner in Fig.9c is
10
the magnification of the dashed box, which is the largest NbC particle in Fig.9c. It can
be seen that the NbC particle is tightly combined with primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides
when the (Fe,Cr)7C3/austenite interface separates, rather than peeled off along with
austenite. It means the cohesion between primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides and NbC is
4. Discussion
It has been known from above results that, the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides in the
of
hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloy with Nb additive are obviously refined
ro
compared to that without Nb additive. In addition, the refinement of the primary
(Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides also affect on the wear resistance and tensile properties of the
-p
hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloys. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the
re
refinement mechanism of the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides by Nb additive.
The phase fraction vs. temperature curves of the two hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C
na
hardfacing alloys are shown in Fig.10. From Fig.10a, it can be found that primary
(Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides in the No.1 alloy starts to precipitate at 1330℃, and then eutectic
ur
phase is consistent with the XRD pattern in Fig.3. From Fig.10b, it can be found that
Jo
MC in the No.2 alloy firstly starts to precipitate at 1350℃, and then primary (Fe,Cr)7C3
carbides starts to precipitate at 1330℃. The eutectic reaction occurs at 1300℃. Except
for the formation of MC in the No.2 alloy, the phase transitions and phase fractions of
the two alloys are almost the same. According to the XRD patterns in Fig.3, it can be
11
deduced that the MC precipitated at 1350℃ is NbC. It should be noted from Fig.5d,
Fig.8d and Fig.9d that NbC mainly distribute in the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides
boundaries or within the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides, which illustrates that primary
(Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides may be combined with the preferentially formed NbC during its
nucleation and growth. Therefore, the refinement of primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides may
carbides .
of
4.2 Misfit between NbC and (Fe,Cr)7C3
ro
By the two-dimensional lattice misfit theory proposed by B.L. Bramfitt [28], the
lattice misfit between the substrate and the nucleated solid smaller than 6% means that
-p
the substrate can be the heterogeneous nucleus of the nucleated solid, and so the
re
nucleated solid will be refined. The two-dimensional lattice misfit theory also declares
that the lattice misfit 6~12% is middle-effective in heterogeneous nucleation, and that
lP
larger than 12% is ineffective. The lattice misfit δ between NbC and (Fe,Cr)7C3 can be
na
(ℎ𝑘𝑙)
𝛿(ℎ𝑘𝑙)𝑛𝑠 = ∑3𝑖=1[(|𝑑[𝑢𝑣𝑤]𝑠 𝑖 cos 𝜃 − 𝑑[𝑢𝑣𝑤]𝑛 𝑖 |/𝑑[𝑢𝑣𝑤]𝑛 𝑖 )/3] × 100% (1)
ur
where (hkl)s is a low-index plane of NbC and [uvw]s is a low-index direction in (hkl)s;
d is the interatomic spacing along [uvw]; θ is the angle between [uvw]n and [uvw]s.
The low-index planes chosen in this paper are (110)NbC and (010) (Fe,Cr) C , whose
7 3
relationship is illustrated in Fig.11. The red circles represent the atoms in NbC, while
the green circles represent the atoms in (Fe,Cr)7C3. δ between NbC and (Fe,Cr)7C3 is
12
calculated based on Eq.(1) and the result is listed in Table 4. From Table 4, δ between
NbC and (Fe,Cr)7C3 is 2.16%, which is dramatically smaller than 6%. It means that the
hardfacing alloy with Nb additive are effectively refined compared to that without Nb
additive.
Table 4 Lattice misfit between (Fe,Cr)7C3 and NbC.
Matching interface (110)NbC//(010) (Fe,Cr)7C3
of
[uvw]s [200] [011] [211]
[uvw]n [001] [100] [101]
ro
θ (°) 0 0 1.6
ds (Å) 4.469 3.160 5.473
dn (Å) 4.540 3.021 5.453
δ (%) 2.16%
the refinement of primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides. Because the hardness of the rod-like
which plays a supporting role by directly contacting with the friction pair during wear
test compared with soft austenite. Under the condition of the same friction pair, large-
ur
sized primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides contact with the friction pair for a longer time than
primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides along with the sliding friction pair is larger than that of the
test, the cracks are appeared at the joint between primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides and
austenite because their interface is seperated. The oscillating amplitude of the refined
13
primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides is small, so the amount of the cracks in Fig.5c is
dramatically smaller than that in Fig.5a. The cracks can directly cause primary
(Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides to fall off, so the mass loss of the hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing
It has been mentioned in Fig.10 that, the phase fractions of the two hypereutectic
Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloys are almost the same except for some NbC in the No.2 alloy,
of
so the doubled tensile strength in Table 3 is due to the refinement of the primary
ro
(Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides. The strength of the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides is higher than that
of austenite, so it can act as tensile “fiber” while tensing parallel to the primary
-p
(Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides. When the fractions of primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides are almost the
re
same, the reduction in size means the number of primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides is
increased. Therefore, the tensile strength parallel to the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides of
lP
the No.2 alloy is increased significantly. Tensile tests of the hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C
na
hardfacing alloys vertical to the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides mainly depends on the
interface is easily separated during tensing, when the size of the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3
the tensile strength vertical to the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides is reduced. It is the reason
why the tensile strength vertical to the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides of the hypereutectic
Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloy with Nb additive is much lower than that without Nb additive.
5. Conclusion
14
(1) The hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloy without Nb additive consists of
(Fe,Cr)7C3 and austenite, while that with Nb additive contains NbC, (Fe,Cr)7C3 and
austenite. The size of the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides in the hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C
hardfacing alloy with Nb additive is much smaller than that without Nb additive.
(2) The refined primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides reduce the amount of the cracks on
the hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloy during wear test. The mass loss comparison
also shows that the refined primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides promote the wear resistance of
of
the hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloy.
ro
(3) Primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides and NbC both displays cleavage fracture
characteristic during tensing, but the cohesion between them is strong so they are tightly
-p
combined with each other. The refined primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides improve the tensile
re
strength parallel to the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides, while reduce the tensile strength
(4) The hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloy with Nb additive forms NbC firstly,
na
after then the phase transition is the same as that without Nb additive. The δ between
NbC and (Fe,Cr)7C3 is 2.16%, which means the preferentially formed NbC refine the
ur
15
Yefei Zhou: Supervision.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal
relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
of
The authors would like to express their gratitude for projects supported by the
ro
National Natural Science Foundation of China under the Contract no. 51771167 and
References
-p
re
[1] X. Chen, C. Su, Y. Wang, A.N. Siddiquee, S. Konovalov, S. Jayalakshmi, R.A. Singh, Cold
metal transfer (CMT) based wire and arc additive manufacture (WAAM) system, J. Surf.
lP
[2] Y.H. Qu, J.D. Xing, X.H. Zhi, J.Y. Peng, H.G. Fu, Effect of cerium on the as-cast
na
microstructure of a hypereutectic high chromium cast iron, Mater. Lett. 62 (2008) 3024-3027.
ur
[3] C. Scandian, C. Boher, J.D.B. de Mello, F. Rézaï-Aria, Effect of molybdenum and chromium
contents in sliding wear of high-chromium white cast iron, Wear 267 (2009) 401-408.
Jo
[4] Y.L. Yuan, Z.G. Li, Eff ects of rod carbide size, content, loading and sliding distance on the
friction and wear behaviors of (Cr, Fe)7C3-reinforced α-Fe based composite coating produced
via PTA welding process, Surf. Coat. Technol. 248 (2014) 9-22.
[5] L. Lu, H. Soda, A. McLean, Microstructure and mechanical properties of Fe-Cr-C eutectic
16
composites, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 347 (2003) 214-222.
chrome carbide weld overlays, Sci. Technol. Weld. Joi. 29, (2014) 696-702.
[8] A. Bedolla-Jacuinde, R. Correa, I. Mejia, J.G. Quedaza, W.M. Rainforth, The effect of titanium
on the wear behaviour of a 16%Cr white cast iron under pure sliding, Wear 263 (2007) 808-
of
820.
ro
[9] T.A. Adler, Ö.N. Dogan, Erosive wear and impact damage of high-chromium white cast irons,
(2009) 257-261.
[11] C.M. Chang, L.H. Chen, C.M. Lin, J.H. Chen, C.M. Fan, W. Wu, Microstructure and wear
na
characteristics of hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C cladding with various carbon contents, Surf. Coat.
[12] C.M. Lin, C.M. Chang, J.H. Chen, W. Wu, Hardness, toughness and cracking systems of
primary (Cr, Fe)23C6 and (Cr, Fe)7C3 carbides in high-carbon Cr-based alloys by indentation,
Jo
[13] C.M. Lin, C.M. Chang, J.H. Chen, W. Wu, The effects of additive elements on the
17
[14] H.S. Ding, S.Q. Liu, H.L. Zhang, J.J. Guo, Improving impact toughness of a high chromium
cast iron regarding joint additive of nitrogen and titanium, Mater. Des. 90 (2016) 958-968.
[16] X.J. Wu, J.D. Xing, H.G. Fu, X.H. Zhi, Effect of titanium on the morphology of primary M7C3
carbides in hypereutectic high chromium white iron, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 457 (2007) 180-185.
[17] S. Kou, Welding Metallurgy, 2nd ed., John Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2003.
of
[18] T. Yuan, S. Kou, Z. Luo, Grain refining by ultrasonic stirring of the weld pool, Acta. Mater.
ro
106 (2016) 144-154.
[19] L.E. Eiselstein, O.A. Ruano, O.D. Sherby, Structural characterization of rapidly solidified
-p
white cast iron powders, J. Mater. Sci., 18 (1983) 483-492.
re
[20] K.H.W. Seah, J. Hemanth, S.C. Sharma, Wear characteristics of sub-zero chilled cast iron,
lP
[21] G. Laird II, Microstructures of Ni-hard I, Ni-hard IV and high-Cr white cast irons, AFS Trans.
na
99 (1991) 339-357.
[22] Z.F. Huang, W.D. Huang, A.F. Zhang, J.D. Xing, Impact and wear properties of semisolid
ur
hypereutectic high chromium cast iron, J. Xi’an Jiaotong Univ. 39 (2005) 775-778.
[23] X.H. Zhi, J.D. Xing, H.G. Fu, Y.M. Gao, Effect of titanium on the as-cast microstructure of
Jo
[24] X.H. Zhi, J.Z. Liu, J.D. Xing, S.Q. Ma, Effect of cerium modification on microstructure and
properties of hypereutectic high chromium cast iron, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 603 (2014) 98-103.
[25] X.W. Qi, Z.N. Jia, Q.X. Yang, Y.L. Yang, Effects of vanadium additive on structure property
18
and tribological performance of high chromium cast iron hardfacing metal, Surf. Coat. Technol.
[26] J. Yang, J.J. Tian, F.F. Hao, T. Dan, X.J. Ren, Y.L. Yang, Q.X. Yang, Microstructure and wear
resistance of the hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C alloy hardfacing metals with different La2O3 additives,
[27] X. Yun, Y.F. Zhou, J. Yang, X.L. Xing, X.J. Ren, Y.L. Yang, Q.X. Yang, Refinement of nano-
of
671-678.
ro
[28] B.L. Bramfitt, The effect of carbide and nitride additions on the heterogeneous nucleation
19
Fig.2 Tensile specimens (a) Geometry and dimensions of specimens for tensile test (unit: mm); (b)
specimens tensed parallel to the primary (Fe,Cr)7C3; (c) specimens tensed vertical to the primary
(Fe,Cr)7C3.
of
ro
-p
re
lP
20
Fig.5 Mass loss of hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloy after wear test.
of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
Fig.6 Worn surfaces of hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloys and corresponding element
distribution maps.
(a) Worn surface and (b) element distribution map of No.1 alloy;
(c) worn surface and (d) element distribution map of No.2 alloy.
21
Fig.7 Tensile curves of hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C alloys parallel to (a) and vertical to (b)
of
primary (Fe,Cr)7C3.
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
Fig.8 Fractographies after tensing parallel to primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 and corresponding element
distribution maps.
(a) Fractography and (b) element distribution map of No.1 alloy;
(c) fractography and (d) element distribution map of No.2 alloy.
22
of
ro
Fig.9 Fractographies after tensing vertical to primary (Fe,Cr)7C3 and corresponding element
distribution maps.
-p
(a) Fractography and (b) element distribution map of No.1 alloy;
(c) fractography and (d) element distribution map of No.2 alloy.
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
Fig.10 Phase fraction vs. temperature curves of hypereutectic Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloys.
(a) No.1 alloy; (b) No.2 alloy.
23
Fig.11 Relationship between (110)NbC and (010) (Fe,Cr)7C3.
of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
24