Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

Pitch class

In music, a pitch class (p.c. or pc) is a set of all pitches that are a
whole number of octaves apart, e.g., the pitch class C consists of the
Cs in all octaves. "The pitch class C stands for all possible Cs, in
whatever octave position."[1] Important to musical set theory, a pitch
class is "all pitches related to each other by octave, enharmonic
equivalence, or both."[2] Thus, using scientific pitch notation, the
pitch class "C" is the set Perfect octave Play

{Cn : n is an integer} = {..., C−2, C−1, C0, C1, C2, C3 ...}.

Although there is no formal upper or lower limit to this sequence,


only a few of these pitches are audible to the human ear. Pitch class is
important because human pitch-perception is periodic: pitches
belonging to the same pitch class are perceived as having a similar
quality or color, a property called "octave equivalence".

Psychologists refer to the quality of a pitch as its "chroma".[3] A


chroma is an attribute of pitches (as opposed to tone height), just like
hue is an attribute of color. A pitch class is a set of all pitches that
share the same chroma, just like "the set of all white things" is the
collection of all white objects.[4]

Note that in standard Western equal temperament, distinct spellings


can refer to the same sounding object: B♯ 3 , C4 , and D 4 all refer to
the same pitch, hence share the same chroma, and therefore belong to
All Cs from C1 to C7 inclusive
the same pitch class; a phenomenon called enharmonic equivalence.
Play .

Contents
Integer notation
Disadvantages
Other ways to label pitch classes
See also
Sources
Further reading

Integer notation
To avoid the problem of enharmonic spellings, theorists typically represent pitch classes using numbers
beginning from zero, with each successively larger integer representing a pitch class that would be one
semitone higher than the preceding one, if they were all realised as actual pitches in the same octave. Because
octave-related pitches belong to the same class, when an octave is reached, the numbers begin again at zero.
This cyclical system is referred to as modular arithmetic and, in the usual case of chromatic twelve-tone scales,
pitch-class numbering is regarded as "modulo 12" (customarily abbreviated "mod 12" in the music-theory
literature)—that is, every twelfth member is identical. One can map a pitch's fundamental frequency f
(measured in hertz) to a real number p using the equation:

This creates a linear pitch space in which octaves have size 12, semitones (the distance between adjacent keys
on the piano keyboard) have size 1, and middle C (C4 ) is assigned the number 0 (thus, the pitches on piano are
−39 to +48). Indeed, the mapping from pitch to real numbers defined in this manner forms the basis of the
MIDI Tuning Standard, which uses the real numbers from 0 to 127 to represent the pitches C−1 to G9 (thus,
middle C is 60). To represent pitch classes, we need to identify or "glue together" all pitches belonging to the
same pitch class—i.e. all numbers p and p + 12. The result is a cyclical quotient group that musicians call pitch
class space and mathematicians call R/12Z. Points in this space can be labelled using real numbers in the range
0 ≤ x < 12. These numbers provide numerical alternatives to the letter names of elementary music theory:

0 = C, 1 = C♯/D♭, 2 = D, 2.5 = D (quarter tone sharp), 3 = D♯/E♭,

and so on. In this system, pitch classes represented by integers are classes of twelve-tone equal temperament
(assuming standard concert A).

In music, integer notation is the translation of


pitch classes and/or interval classes into whole
numbers.[5] Thus if C = 0, then C♯ = 1 ... A♯ =
10, B = 11, with "10" and "11" substituted by "t"
and "e" in some sources,[5] A and B in others[6]
(like the duodecimal numeral system, which also
uses "t" and "e", or A and B, for "10" and "11").
This allows the most economical presentation of
information regarding post-tonal materials.[5] Integer notation.

In the integer model of pitch, all pitch classes and


intervals between pitch classes are designated using the numbers 0 through 11. It is not used to notate music
for performance, but is a common analytical and compositional tool when working with chromatic music,
including twelve tone, serial, or otherwise atonal music.

Pitch classes can be notated in this way by assigning the number 0 to some note and assigning consecutive
integers to consecutive semitones; so if 0 is C natural, 1 is C♯, 2 is D♮ and so on up to 11, which is B♮. The C
above this is not 12, but 0 again (12 − 12 = 0). Thus arithmetic modulo 12 is used to represent octave
equivalence. One advantage of this system is that it ignores the "spelling" of notes (B♯, C♮ and D are all 0)
according to their diatonic functionality.

Disadvantages

There are a few disadvantages with integer notation. First, theorists have traditionally used the same integers to
indicate elements of different tuning systems. Thus, the numbers 0, 1, 2, ... 5, are used to notate pitch classes in
6-tone equal temperament. This means that the meaning of a given integer changes with the underlying tuning
system: "1" can refer to C♯ in 12-tone equal temperament, but D in 6-tone equal temperament.

Also, the same numbers are used to represent both pitches and intervals. For example, the number 4 serves
both as a label for the pitch class E (if C = 0) and as a label for the distance between the pitch classes D and
F♯. (In much the same way, the term "10 degrees" can label both a temperature and the distance between two
temperatures.) Only one of these labelings is sensitive to the (arbitrary) choice of pitch class 0. For example, if
one makes a different choice about which pitch class is labeled 0, then the pitch class E will no longer be
labeled "4". However, the distance between D and F♯ will still be assigned the number 4. Both this and the
issue in the paragraph directly above may be viewed as disadvantages (though mathematically, an element "4"
should not be confused with the function "+4").

Other ways to label pitch classes


The system described above is flexible enough to describe any Pitch class
pitch class in any tuning system: for example, one can use the
Pitch
numbers {0, 2.4, 4.8, 7.2, 9.6} to refer to the five-tone scale that class
Tonal counterparts Solfege
divides the octave evenly. However, in some contexts, it is
convenient to use alternative labeling systems. For example, in just 0 C (also B♯, D ) do
intonation, we may express pitches in terms of positive rational 1 C♯, D♭ (also B )
numbers pq , expressed by reference to a 1 (often written " 11 "),
2 D (also C , E ) re
which represents a fixed pitch. If a and b are two positive rational
numbers, they belong to the same pitch class if and only if 3 D♯, E♭ (also F )

4 E (also D , F♭) mi

5 F (also E♯, G ) fa

for some integer n. Therefore, we can represent pitch classes in this 6 F♯, G♭ (also E )
p
system using ratios q where neither p nor q is divisible by 2, that 7 G (also F , A ) sol
is, as ratios of odd integers. Alternatively, we can represent just
p 8 G♯, A♭
intonation pitch classes by reducing to the octave, 1 ≤ q < 2.
9 A (also G , B ) la
It is also very common to label pitch classes with reference to some 10, t or A A♯, B♭ (also C )
scale. For example, one can label the pitch classes of n-tone equal
temperament using the integers 0 to n − 1. In much the same way, 11, e or B B (also A , C♭) ti
one could label the pitch classes of the C major scale, C–D–E–F–
G–A–B, using the numbers from 0 to 6. This system has two advantages over the continuous labeling system
described above. First, it eliminates any suggestion that there is something natural about a twelvefold division
of the octave. Second, it avoids pitch-class universes with unwieldy decimal expansions when considered
relative to 12; for example, in the continuous system, the pitch-classes of 19 equal temperament are labeled
0.63158..., 1.26316..., etc. Labeling these pitch classes {0, 1, 2, 3 ..., 18} simplifies the arithmetic used in
pitch-class set manipulations.

The disadvantage of the scale-based system is that it assigns an infinite number of different names to chords
that sound identical. For example, in twelve-tone equal-temperament the C major triad is notated {0, 4, 7}. In
twenty-four-tone equal-temperament, this same triad is labeled {0, 8, 14}. Moreover, the scale-based system
appears to suggest that different tuning systems use steps of the same size ("1") but have octaves of differing
size ("12" in 12-tone equal-temperament, "19" in 19-tone equal temperament, and so on), whereas in fact the
opposite is true: different tuning systems divide the same octave into different-sized steps.

In general, it is often more useful to use the traditional integer system when one is working within a single
temperament; when one is comparing chords in different temperaments, the continuous system can be more
useful.

See also
Flat (music)
Sharp (music)
Pitch circularity
Pitch interval
Tone row (List)

Sources
1. Arnold Whittall, The Cambridge Introduction to Serialism (New York: Cambridge University
Press, 2008): 276. ISBN 978-0-521-68200-8 (pbk).
2. Don Michael Randel, ed. (2003). "Set theory", The Harvard Dictionary of Music, p.776. Harvard.
ISBN 9780674011632.
3. Tymoczko, Dmitri (2011). A Geometry of Music: Harmony and Counterpoint in the Extended
Common Practice, p.30. Oxford Studies in Music Theory. ISBN 9780199714353.
4. Müller, Meinard (2007). Information Retrieval for Music and Motion, p.60.
ISBN 9783540740483. "A pitch class is defined to be the set of all pitches that share the same
chroma."
5. Whittall (2008), p.273.
6. Robert D. Morris, "Generalizing Rotational Arrays", Journal of Music Theory 32, no. 1 (Spring
1988): 75–132, citation on 83.

Further reading
Purwins, Hendrik (2005). "Profiles of Pitch Classes: Circularity of Relative Pitch and Key—
Experiments, Models, Computational Music Analysis, and Perspectives (http://opus.kobv.de/tub
erlin/volltexte/2005/1085/)". Ph.D. Thesis. Berlin: Technische Universität Berlin.
Rahn, John (1980). Basic Atonal Theory. New York: Longman; London and Toronto: Prentice
Hall International. ISBN 0-02-873160-3. Reprinted 1987, New York: Schirmer Books; London:
Collier Macmillan.
Schuijer, Michiel (2008). Analyzing Atonal Music: Pitch-Class Set Theory and Its Contexts.
Eastman Studies in Music 60. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press. ISBN 978-1-
58046-270-9.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pitch_class&oldid=961160884"

This page was last edited on 6 June 2020, at 23:07 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this
site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi