Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
”Steel”, “glass”, “concrete”, “high-rise”, “skyscraper”, are all the common words used for
the new style of architecture, or modern architecture. But what about “victorian”, “red bricks”,
“balcony”, “chimney”, or words for old and historical buildings? The aim of this essay is to give an
overview of the advantages and disadvantages of both, modern buildings and historical buildings by
giving examples in the city of London. There have been several debates between architects because
of 2 different opinions. The first one is the city needs to be expanded vertically to hosts more spaces
and to compete with other modern cities in the world, on the other hand, the city needs to preserve
its heritage buildings for many purposes such as historical, aesthetic, and educational purposes. The
author will be looking from both perspectives and giving examples, and finally some solutions to
The 20th century will be remembered for many things such as; devastating wars, remarkable
technological change, the human population explosion, environmental degradation, but perhaps
above all the dramatic urbanisation of human societies. At the beginning of the present century
about 150 million people lived in cities and towns, less than one in ten of what was then the world's
population. By the end of this century this figure will have increased twenty-fold, amounting to half
the world's population. In 1900, only five or six urban regions had more than a million people. By
2010, a similar number will each have a population of more than 20 million. In the unfolding of
human experience the 20th century will have been the brige between the last rural century and the
One of the busiest cities in the world, the city of London is the capital of the United
Kingdom, attracting immigrants from all over the world. Each year the city grew by the population
of a small town. It had the finest architecture and the river made London a centre of international
trade. The population had seen massive growth and the streets thronged with wealth and squalor
around 5500000 people in 1890, and increased until it reached its peak in 1940 with almost
9000000 people lived in London. The population slightly declined to 7000000 in 1980 and remain
stable for 10 years, and increased to 7500000 in 2010, with population density of 4,807 people per
Despite the fact that London is getting bigger and bigger, the city requires more spaces each
day for people to do their activities. London is now facing the truth that the area could not be
expanded anywhere else, since it is almost taking another neighbouring cities around.
Local authorities and architects are thinking about 'bringing back the city' which means start
to build from the centre again rather than keep expanding horizontally. The most common solution
is to demolish the existing old buildings, and replace them with new and modern skyscrapers which
can accommodate more people in them, and also to keep the city of London aware with the trends
Cities in the world are now competing on modern look by adding modern skyscrapers on their
skyline.
The London Plan published by the Mayor of London in 2004, estimated that the population
would reach 8.1 million by 2016, and continue to rise thereafter. This was reflected in a move
towards denser, more urban styles of building, including a greatly increased number of tall
buildings, and proposals for major enhancements to the public transport network. (Powell, 2004)
According to Wall (2010) modernism began with the assumption that it would completely
reshape cities in bold new forms. Many modernism proposed a complete rejection of traditional
styles. What is the importance of keeping what is called 'Traditional Style'? Traditional
architectural detail, ornament and well-finished construction can create a sense of well-being,
whereas functional concrete slabs can be stark, unfriendly, and invite graffiti. The original
Corbusian idea of stark white towers rising under a blue Mediterranean sky, from which rain seldom
falls, is inappropriate in Britain. Le Corbusier's flat roofs were a practically in such climates rather
than a constant maintenance problem as in Britain. Thus, Public awareness and concern with
architectural and urban aesthetic issues, such as the design of new buildings, and the conservation
of historic buildings, have increased. The general public may expect more, rather than less, design
control from the town planners than in the past. Bad visual design is often accompanied by poor
functional design, making buildings dull and difficult to live or work in. people like user-friendly
buildings, and welcome interest and variety in the townscape as they go about their daily business
(Punter, 1990).
There are three aspects of the value of conservation has been researched by the London
Planning Adviser Committee; environmental, social, and economic. London's historic environment
is an invaluable record of our past. Parliament has legislated for its protection because it shows
some of the highest achievements of our culture and is a source of national pride. And also the
creating a diverse urban fabric and differentiating the character of one area from another. For the
social aspect, buildings, towns, monuments, and other historic features are a fascinating and
important educational resource. 70% of respondents, Londoners and visitors alike, referred to
historic buildings, old churches, ceremonies, and pageantry as the features they like most about
London. The economic value of conserving London's historic environment is related to, and in some
instances, generated by, the environmental and social factors referred to above. Tourism and
property market are the major consideration of the economic value. (Macdonald, 1995)
Public awareness and concern with architectural and urban aesthetic issues, such as the
design of new buildings, and the conservation of historic buildings, have increased. The general
public may expect more, rather than less, design control from the town planners than in the past.
Bad visual design is often accompanied by poor functional design, making buildings dull and
difficult to live or work in. people like user-friendly buildings, and welcome interest and variety in
Jane Jacobs, in The death and life of great American cities (1961), writes : 'cities need old
building so badly it is probably impossible for vigorous streets and districts to grow without them.
By old buildings, I mean not museum-piece old buildings, not old in an excellent and expensive
state of rehabilitation, but also good lot of plain, ordinary, low value buildings, including some run
Many solutions have been proposed for this problem. Conserving London's historic
environment is of real value. It is fundamental to the capital's future prosperity and its role as a
world city. Macdonald (1995) recommended several policy initiatives to realise this potential. The
first one is promote London's historic framework as a feature of national and international
importance. The government should set out the requirements for policies to conserve buildings,
monuments, spaces, artefacts, and views which give London its unique character. The second one is
a journal of redundant public buildings which includes examples of buildings successfully recycled
to productive uses.
sustainability principles and is a key contributor to the economic well-being of London and the
nation (Macdonald, 1995). I believe by conserving the existing buildings will bring many benefits
to the city and the people who inhabit it and also helps to retain a sense of place and identity and
• Gilbert, R (1996) MAKING CITIES WORK; the role of local authorities in the urban
• Punter, J (1990) Design control in Bristol 1940-1990 : the impact of planning on the design
AVA Publishing.