1

Ben Wickham Registrar High Court of Australia 11-10-2020

enquiries@hcourt.gov.au
5 AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

Ben,
as far as I understand it when a registrar declines to accept any document for filing then a
judge of the court is to determine if in the circumstances prevailing the documentation is to be
allowed to be filed. I am not aware that this eventuated with your refusal to accept my
10 documentation lodges as a “COMPLAINT” on 10 September 2020.
I have attached documents being 20201011-Affidavit & 20201011-Order Nisi to replace the 10
September 2020 lodged documents. (For the Melbourne office of HCA)
I had a friend assistance to reorganize the Order Nisi Application, which requires URGENT
Interim (EX PARTE) Orders as I have set out both in the grounds as well as in my Affidavit.
15
As I indicated in previous writings I did have problems, and still do, having any documentation
printed due to the restrictions that the Victorian Government has applied. I consider those
restrictions to be unconstitutional but considering the violence by the Victorian Police force so
often demonstrated it be too dangerous to try to physically challenge this. Neither could any
20 judge of a court expect a citizen to “take the law into his own hands” when alternative options
are available such as to file a “COMPLAINT” with the court which then by interim or other
orders can address the issues at hand.
Besides the restrictions, my main computer started to cause problems that at times certain letters
do not work and when even trying to log in to the computer can take hours, until finally it allows
25 me to log in. Only then at times within minutes to log out by itself and then the problems start all
over again. And I deleted the pin number to be used to only be confronted with my password. As
this too was a problem as one of the letters often do not work I decided to change the password.
Well guess what, the computer nevertheless demands me to use the old password and then I still
need to use the new password also. As I am limited within 5 kilometres by the draconic
30 unconstitutional directives by the Chief Health Officer and the local computer store closed years
ago and a repairer is closed apparently not being an “essential” business then no repairs can be
done. I tried to arrange for a replacement computer but well not being able to get to any
computer store within a 5 kilometres distance as they are all beyond this distance I am left not
being able to purchase a replacement in person and other arrangements so far have not worked
35 out either. Even a simple thing as purchasing a new electric shaver is not possible because the
store is more than 5 kilometres from my residence. I had a back up old one but this too now has
given up his soul. As such, there is a lot more problems as now I am resorting to using a trimmer
as trying to shave. Not much luck in that either. Simple things of live now become noticeable a
problem and not because COVID-19 but because of the idiocy of the government.
40
https://www.aier.org/article/the-constitutional-reckoning-of-state-lockdown-orders/
The Constitutional Reckoning of State Lockdown Orders
QUOTE

p1 11-10-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 2
“Pennsylvania Federal Court in Butler County v. Wolf reviewed the indefinite
“emergency” restrictions imposed by the executive branch of Pennsylvania government,
declaring limitations on gathering size, “stay-at-home orders,” and mandatory business
closures unconstitutional. Refusing to accept the alleged need for a “new normal,” the
5 Court stated that an “independent judiciary [is needed] to serve as a check on the exercise
of emergency government power.”
END QUOTE

AGAIN: the Court stated that an “independent judiciary [is needed] to serve as a check on
10 the exercise of emergency government power.”

Where then the State of Victoria prevents me to conduct matters to file my documents in an
ordinary manner as required by the Rules of the Court then the Court is obligated to provide such
orders that permits me to nevertheless pursue my “COMPLAINT”!
15
While I anticipated to amend the Affidavit before lodging the documentation as to separate a
certain amount of details from the main body into an Attachment and provide other
details/information such as copies of the videos referred to however it now being already 31 days
since I lodged the documents on 10 September 2020 and no interim court orders were provided
20 to assist me to overcome certain problems I am left no alternative but to lodge the documentation
as is, and perhaps in time to come can provide on DVD/USB key further material referred to in
the Affidavit.

RE: see attachment 20200911-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Victoria's

25 Human Rights Commissioner Kristen Hilton-Supplement 1
From DJCS-VEOHRC-Enquiries (DJCS)
To admin@inspector-rikati.com
QUOTE
With regard to your query related to legal intervention, for your general information, the Commission will
consider intervening in proceedings where:

 the issues are significant and not peripheral to the proceedings

30  the orders that could be made in the proceedings may significantly affect the rights of persons who
are not parties to the proceedings

 the proceedings may have significant implications for the ongoing interpretation or operation of the
statutory provision being interpreted in light of the Charter and the Equal Opportunity Act

 the proceedings may have significant implications for the ongoing application, implementation
35 and/or operation of the Charter and the Equal Opportunity Act
END QUOTE

In the event, you were to decline to accept the documentation for filing than I seek a review
before a judge of the court. Once I email this correspondence with the attachments I intent to
40 publish it all on my blog as well as distribute it so other Australians will be fully aware of the
details in the material.

This document is not intended and neither must be perceived to refer to all details/issues.

Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O. W. B. (Friends call me Gerrit)

45 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

(Our name is our motto!)

p2 11-10-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati