Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
October - 2020
Special Consultant
Trafficability Survey Unit
477 Army Survey Group Engineers,
Lahore Cantt.
Reviewed By:
Dr. Muhammad Farooq Ahmed
Subsoil Investigation Report for the Construction of a Residential Building at Plot # 306-H, Phase-VI, DHA Lahore
Subsoil Investigation Report for the Construction of a Residential Building
At Plot No. 306-H (20 Marla) , Phase-VI, DHA Lahore
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 General 1
1.2 Purpose and Scope of Work 1
2 EXPLORATION METHODOLOGY 1
2.1 Exploratory Boring and Sampling 2
2.2 Laboratory Testing 2
2.3 Discussion on Field and Laboratory Test Results 2
3 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATIONS 3
Illustrations 8
Subsoil Investigation Report for the Construction of a Residential Building at Plot # 306-H, Phase-VI, DHA Lahore
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 General
Mrs. Rukhshanda Javed, requested to University of Engineering & Technology (UET), Lahore
for the preparation of subsoil investigation report for the construction of a residential
building/house at plot number 306-H, Phase-VI, DHA Lahore. Dr Muhammad Arshad and
Dr. Muhammad Farooq Ahmed from Department of Geological Engineering, UET, Lahore
were engaged to prepare an interpretive report on the subsurface soil investigations carried out at
the project site for designing an appropriate foundation system for the required structure. Field
investigations were carried out through two number of the exploratory borehole, each up to a
maximum depth of 40 ft below the existing ground surface level (or Natural Ground Surface
Level) which is 1.5 ft below the existing road level, approximately. Borehole locations are
shown in Figure 1. The fieldwork was carried out on 3/10/2020 under the supervision of a
representative of Department of Geological Engineering, UET, Lahore. The laboratory
testing on the representative soil samples was also conducted in the geotechnical engineering
laboratory of the Department of Geological Engineering, UET, Lahore. This report presents
the findings of the geotechnical investigations carried out in relation to a specific site, location
and purpose.
2. EXPLORATION METHODOLOGY
Field explorations were carried out at the site through two number of boreholes, each one 40 ft
deep with reference to an existing footprint at locations shown in Figure-1 (Illustrations) while
Subsoil Investigation Report for the Construction of a Residential Building at Plot# 306-H, Phase-VI, DHA Lahore
Page 1
the coordinates of these locations are mentioned on BH logs. The water table was not
encountered up to the depth of exploration. Brief details of the methodology of the investigation
are outlined in the following sections:
The SPT-Resistance values (N-values), a detailed description of the subsurface soils encountered
and the depth at which soil samples were procured are shown on the boring log (Appendix-A).
Soil descriptions on the boring log are a compilation of the field and laboratory testing data. The
stratification lines represent the approximate boundary between soil types and transitions may be
assumed gradual. The engineering/mechanical properties of soils including the angle of internal
friction (ɸ'), moist unit (γb) weight, relative density (Dr) and unconfined compressive strength
(qu) can be evaluated on the basis of SPT „N' values. For this purpose in the existing literature
different ranges of the SPT „N' values have been identified to differentiate the numerical values
of the above-mentioned engineering/mechanical properties. Table 1 can be used to evaluate such
properties for a particular SPT „N‟ value as recommended by Terzaghi and others.
Subsoil Investigation Report for the Construction of a Residential Building at Plot# 306-H, Phase-VI, DHA Lahore
Page 2
Using grain size analyses of the data shows that strata are mostly silty-clay up to the
depth of 6 ft from the existing footprint, strata in the range of 6-12 ft depth are clayey-silt
and below this, strata are silty-sand up to the final depth of exploration of 40 ft.
Collectively the lower formations of soil can be considered as non-cohesive.
Based on SPT blows (N-values), the upper strata were found in firm state, the strata in the
depth range of 6‒12 ft were in loose state and below this, in general, in medium dense
state up to the final depth of exploration of 40 ft at both of the BH locations.
Natural moisture content (NMC) varies between 7.66‒23.68, and 6.13‒22.94% for
borehole 1 and 2 respectively, up to the exploration depth of 40 ft.
Plasticity Index of the selected/tested soil sample was found in the range 5‒6, leading to
the following interpretations:
PI=0 non-plastic
PI<7 low-plastic
PI >7 and <14 medium plastic
PI>14 highly plastic
A summary of LL and PL values is given on Table 2. Figure 2 shows plots of liquid limit and
plasticity index data on the Casagrande Plasticity Chart. The liquid limit of cohesive soil sample
was found in the range of 23‒25%. As per Unified Soil Classification System, strata can be
considered as the blend of CL-ML (CL is for inorganic clay of low to medium plasticity,
gravelly clay, sandy clay, silty clay and ML is for inorganic silt with very fine sand, clayey silt
with slight plasticity) or OL (organic silt and organic silty clay of low plasticity).
3. GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATIONS
Subsurface soils disclosed by two exploratory borehole shows that soil can be categorized as the
silty-clay to silty-sand. The actual thickness of each stratum along with SPT resistance (N-
values) is shown on the borehole log, (Appendix-A). Ground Water Table (GWT) was not
encountered up to the depth of exploration at the time of these investigations.
Subsoil Investigation Report for the Construction of a Residential Building at Plot# 306-H, Phase-VI, DHA Lahore
Page 3
safety of 3.0 to 4.0 is generally adopted for this purpose.
ii. Foundations should not settle excessively under the service loads. Settlement of 25 mm
is usually taken as permissible for strip footing and 50 mm to 100 mm for the raft.
iii. Foundations must stay safe under tensile, lateral, moment and earthquake loadings.
A representative value of allowable bearing capacity of the strip footing having 3 ft width and
placed at 3~4 ft depth below the existing natural surface level can be considered as 0.75 TSF
(≈80 KPa). This is worth to mention that existing footprint level in the plot area is almost, 1.5 ft
below the existing road level and is suffering from undesirable vegetation.
Subsoil Investigation Report for the Construction of a Residential Building at Plot# 306-H, Phase-VI, DHA Lahore
Page 4
assumption that the trend of SPT „N' value will prevail even below the exploratory borehole
depth of 40 ft from the existing foot-print (NSL).
The natural sub-grade should be properly compacted such that its density should not be less than
95% of the Modified Proctor density value. The compaction activity should be carried out under
the supervision of qualified staff along with quality control checks. Additionally, damp-proofing
measures including geo-textiles, polyethene sheets etc should be applied below the RCC Raft
slab. Concrete walls should also be coated with the bituminous coating, acrylic modified cement,
surface bonding mortar or any material permitted for waterproofing. However, explicit
application recommendations for the specific treatment provided by the manufactures should be
keenly observed. The above mentioned measures are more specifically intended when the rise of
the water table is expected with seasonal weather conditions. The use of ordinary Portland
cement is the existing standard practice in the project area.
Ks(T/ft3) = ( )
4.4 Seismicity
The project site (Lahore city) lies in Zone 2A, as per the revised Seismic Provisions (2007) of the
Building Code of Pakistan. This shows the probability of slight damage under the earthquakes
and corresponds to horizontal peak ground acceleration (PGA) of 0.08g to 0.16g. This
acceleration has a 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years period. In addition to that the
liquefaction potential of the site strata is almost negligible as per criterion identified in the
existing literature.
Subsoil Investigation Report for the Construction of a Residential Building at Plot# 306-H, Phase-VI, DHA Lahore
Page 5
4.5 Some Constructional Aspects
We recommend the following measures during the construction of the subject building/facility:
Proper surface drainage should be provided in the area and the area should be graded to
keep the surface runoff away from the structure.
To reduce ingress of water to foundation soils, plinth protection slab sloping away from
the structure in unpaved portion should be provided to ensure positive protection, the
plinth protection slab should extend beyond such portion of the structure at least 2.5 ft
from the face of the walls. A PCC layer, 4 inches thick, may be provided for this purpose.
It is highly desirable to provide a well compacted (not less than 95% of the Modified
Proctor density value) sand cushion of 1 ft thickness in two number of layers (each one 6
inch in thickness) below the floor finishes.
An experienced engineer should observe/monitor the construction activities to check that
the works are performed in accordance with the plans and specifications. Field and
laboratory tests should be performed to confirm that the material quality, compaction and
strength to meet the project specifications.
Retaining structure to provide the lateral stability to the foundation brickwork seems to
be mandatory, more specifically, when there is no building in the close vicinity of the
proposed residential structure/building.
Subsoil Investigation Report for the Construction of a Residential Building at Plot# 306-H, Phase-VI, DHA Lahore
Page 6
and retained to review our report to determine the applicability of the conclusions and
recommendations, considering the changed conditions and/or time lapse.
This report has been prepared on the bases of experimental data collected in the field and
laboratory by the staff of Department of Geological Engineering, UET, Lahore for the
recommendation of foundation types for the construction of residential building.
Paragraphs, statements, test results, boring logs, diagrams etc., should not be taken out of
the context and should not be utilized for any other structure at any site even in the close
vicinity of the proposed project locations discussed in this report.
Subsoil Investigation Report for the Construction of a Residential Building at Plot# 306-H, Phase-VI, DHA Lahore
Page 7
Illustrations
Subsoil Investigation Report for the Construction of a Residential Building at Plot# 306-H, Phase-VI, DHA Lahore
Page 8
Table 1. Empirical values for φ, qu, Dr and unit weight of soil based on SPT
Subsoil Investigation Report for the Construction of a Residential Building at Plot# 306-H, Phase-VI, DHA Lahore
Page 9
location of BHs
Approximate
Figure 1. Borehole Location through Google Map
70
60
50
Plasticity Index
40
30
CL - ML
20
10 CL or OL
ML or OL MH or OH
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Subsoil Investigation Report for the Construction of a Residential Building at Plot# 306-H, Phase-VI, DHA Lahore
Page 10
Figure 3. Types of Shallow Foundations
Subsoil Investigation Report for the Construction of a Residential Building at Plot# 306-H, Phase-VI, DHA Lahore
Page 11
Figure 4. Field Testing in Progress
Subsoil Investigation Report for the Construction of a Residential Building at Plot# 306-H, Phase-VI, DHA Lahore
Page 12
Figure 5. Laboratory Testing in Progress
Subsoil Investigation Report for the Construction of a Residential Building at Plot# 306-H, Phase-VI, DHA Lahore
Page 13
University of Engineering & Technology,
Lahore
DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Engineering Geology & Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory
Client: Mrs. Rukhshanda Javed, 306-H, Phase-VI, Your Ref.: Dated on 01/10/2020
DHA Lahore
Consultant: Test Results Submitted on: 10/10/2020
Project: Construction of a Residential Building at Depth
Plot#306, Sector-H, Phase-VI, DHA BH 01 SPT 1 3.0 ‒4.5
(ft)
Lahore
Sieve Analysis as Per
Gravel Sand Silt/Clay
100 ASTM D 6913
ASTM D 422
90 Hydrometer type:
Percentage passing by mass (%)
80 152H
Gravel (%) 1.5
70 Sand (%) 33.8
Silt & Clay (%) 64.6
60 Sieve Size Passing
(mm) (%)
50
19.05 100.0
40 4.25 98.5
30 2 96.9
1.18 93.8
20 0.6 90.8
10 0.425 87.7
0.3 81.5
0 0.15 73.8
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
0.075 64.6
Opening size (mm)
Client: Mrs. Rukhshanda Javed, 306-H, Phase-VI, Your Ref.: Dated on 01/10/2020
DHA Lahore
Consultant: Test Results Submitted on: 10/10/2020
Project: Construction of a Residential Building at Depth
Plot#306, Sector-H, Phase-VI, DHA BH 01 SPT 2 6.0 ‒7.5
(ft)
Lahore
Sieve Analysis as Per
Gravel Sand Silt/Clay
100 ASTM D 6913
ASTM D 422
90 Hydrometer type:
Percentage passing by mass (%)
80 152H
Gravel (%) 2.5
70 Sand (%) 18.3
60 Silt & Clay (%) 79.2
Sieve Size Passing
50 (mm) (%)
19.05 100.0
40
4.25 97.5
30 2 95.8
20 1.18 94.2
0.6 92.5
10 0.425 90.0
0 0.3 87.5
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.15 84.2
Opening size (mm) 0.075 79.2
Client: Mrs. Rukhshanda Javed, 306-H, Phase-VI, Your Ref.: Dated on 01/10/2020
DHA Lahore
Consultant: Test Results Submitted on: 10/10/2020
Project: Construction of a Residential Building at Depth
Plot#306, Sector-H, Phase-VI, DHA BH 01 SPT 3 9.0 ‒10.5
(ft)
Lahore
Sieve Analysis as Per
Gravel Sand Silt/Clay
100 ASTM D 6913
ASTM D 422
90 Hydrometer type:
Percentage passing by mass (%)
80 152H
Gravel (%) 1.0
70 Sand (%) 10.4
60 Silt & Clay (%) 88.6
Sieve Size Passing
50 (mm) (%)
19.05 100.0
40
4.25 99.0
30 2 99.0
20 1.18 99.0
0.6 99.0
10 0.425 99.0
0 0.3 97.6
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.15 94.6
Opening size (mm) 0.075 88.6
Client: Mrs. Rukhshanda Javed, 306-H, Phase-VI, Your Ref.: Dated on 01/10/2020
DHA Lahore
Consultant: Test Results Submitted on: 10/10/2020
Project: Construction of a Residential Building at Depth
Plot#306, Sector-H, Phase-VI, DHA BH 01 SPT 4 12.0 ‒13.5
(ft)
Lahore
Sieve Analysis as Per
Gravel Sand Silt/Clay
100 ASTM D 6913
ASTM D 422
90 Hydrometer type:
Percentage passing by mass (%)
80 152H
Gravel (%) 0.0
70 Sand (%) 10.0
60 Silt & Clay (%) 90.0
Sieve Size Passing
50 (mm) (%)
19.05 100.0
40
4.25 100.0
30 2 100.0
20 1.18 100.0
0.6 98.6
10 0.425 97.1
0 0.3 95.7
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.15 92.9
Opening size (mm) 0.075 90.0
Client: Mrs. Rukhshanda Javed, 306-H, Phase-VI, Your Ref.: Dated on 01/10/2020
DHA Lahore
Consultant: Test Results Submitted on: 10/10/2020
Project: Construction of a Residential Building at Depth
Plot#306, Sector-H, Phase-VI, DHA BH 01 SPT 5 15.0 ‒16.5
(ft)
Lahore
Sieve Analysis as Per
Gravel Sand Silt/Clay
100 ASTM D 6913
ASTM D 422
90 Hydrometer type:
Percentage passing by mass (%)
80 152H
Gravel (%) 0.0
70 Sand (%) 80.3
60 Silt & Clay (%) 19.7
Sieve Size Passing
50 (mm) (%)
40 19.05 100.0
4.25 100.0
30 2 100.0
20 1.18 100.0
0.6 100.0
10 0.425 100.0
0 0.3 98.9
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.15 55.6
Opening size (mm) 0.075 19.7
Client: Mrs. Rukhshanda Javed, 306-H, Phase-VI, Your Ref.: Dated on 01/10/2020
DHA Lahore
Consultant: Test Results Submitted on: 10/10/2020
Project: Construction of a Residential Building at Depth
Plot#306, Sector-H, Phase-VI, DHA BH 01 SPT 6 20.0 ‒21.5
(ft)
Lahore
Sieve Analysis as Per
Gravel Sand Silt/Clay
100 ASTM D 6913
ASTM D 422
90 Hydrometer type:
Percentage passing by mass (%)
80 152H
Gravel (%) 0.0
70 Sand (%) 76.1
60 Silt & Clay (%) 23.9
Sieve Size Passing
50 (mm) (%)
40 19.05 100.0
4.25 100.0
30 2 100.0
20 1.18 100.0
0.6 100.0
10 0.425 100.0
0 0.3 97.8
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.15 72.4
Opening size (mm) 0.075 23.9
Client: Mrs. Rukhshanda Javed, 306-H, Phase-VI, Your Ref.: Dated on 01/10/2020
DHA Lahore
Consultant: Test Results Submitted on: 10/10/2020
Project: Construction of a Residential Building at Depth
Plot#306, Sector-H, Phase-VI, DHA BH 01 SPT 7 25.0 ‒26.5
(ft)
Lahore
Sieve Analysis as Per
Gravel Sand Silt/Clay
100 ASTM D 6913
ASTM D 422
90 Hydrometer type:
Percentage passing by mass (%)
80 152H
Gravel (%) 0.0
70 Sand (%) 90.5
60 Silt & Clay (%) 9.5
Sieve Size Passing
50 (mm) (%)
40 19.05 100.0
4.25 100.0
30 2 100.0
20 1.18 100.0
0.6 100.0
10 0.425 100.0
0 0.3 100.0
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.15 49.4
Opening size (mm) 0.075 9.5
Client: Mrs. Rukhshanda Javed, 306-H, Phase-VI, Your Ref.: Dated on 01/10/2020
DHA Lahore
Consultant: Test Results Submitted on: 10/10/2020
Project: Construction of a Residential Building at Depth
Plot#306, Sector-H, Phase-VI, DHA BH 01 SPT 8 30.0 ‒31.5
(ft)
Lahore
Sieve Analysis as Per
Gravel Sand Silt/Clay
100 ASTM D 6913
ASTM D 422
90 Hydrometer type:
Percentage passing by mass (%)
80 152H
Gravel (%) 0.0
70 Sand (%) 57.9
60 Silt & Clay (%) 42.1
Sieve Size Passing
50 (mm) (%)
40 19.05 100.0
4.25 100.0
30 2 100.0
20 1.18 100.0
0.6 100.0
10 0.425 100.0
0 0.3 97.3
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.15 90.2
Opening size (mm) 0.075 42.1
Client: Mrs. Rukhshanda Javed, 306-H, Phase-VI, Your Ref.: Dated on 01/10/2020
DHA Lahore
Consultant: Test Results Submitted on: 10/10/2020
Project: Construction of a Residential Building at Depth
Plot#306, Sector-H, Phase-VI, DHA BH 01 SPT 9 35.0 ‒36.5
(ft)
Lahore
Sieve Analysis as Per
Gravel Sand Silt/Clay
100 ASTM D 6913
ASTM D 422
90 Hydrometer type:
Percentage passing by mass (%)
80 152H
Gravel (%) 1.4
70 Sand (%) 9.0
60 Silt & Clay (%) 89.6
Sieve Size Passing
50 (mm) (%)
19.05 100.0
40
4.25 98.6
30 2 98.6
20 1.18 98.6
0.6 97.1
10 0.425 95.7
0.3 94.3
0
0.15 92.1
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.075 89.6
Opening size (mm)
Client: Mrs. Rukhshanda Javed, 306-H, Phase-VI, Your Ref.: Dated on 01/10/2020
DHA Lahore
Consultant: Test Results Submitted on: 10/10/2020
Project: Construction of a Residential Building at Depth
Plot#306, Sector-H, Phase-VI, DHA BH 01 SPT 10 40.0 ‒41.5
(ft)
Lahore
Sieve Analysis as Per
Gravel Sand Silt/Clay
100 ASTM D 6913
ASTM D 422
90 Hydrometer type:
Percentage passing by mass (%)
80 152H
Gravel (%) 0.0
70 Sand (%) 96.9
60 Silt & Clay (%) 3.1
Sieve Size Passing
50 (mm) (%)
40 19.05 100.0
4.25 100.0
30 2 99.0
20 1.18 99.0
0.6 99.0
10 0.425 97.9
0 0.3 96.4
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.15 8.3
Opening size (mm) 0.075 3.1
Client: Mrs. Rukhshanda Javed, 306-H, Phase-VI, Your Ref.: Dated on 01/10/2020
DHA Lahore
Consultant: Test Results Submitted on: 10/10/2020
Project: Construction of a Residential Building at Depth
Plot#306, Sector-H, Phase-VI, DHA BH 02 SPT 1 3.0 ‒4.5
(ft)
Lahore
Sieve Analysis as Per
Gravel Sand Silt/Clay
100 ASTM D 6913
ASTM D 422
90 Hydrometer type:
Percentage passing by mass (%)
80 152H
Gravel (%) 1.7
70 Sand (%) 15.0
Silt & Clay (%) 83.3
60 Sieve Size Passing
(mm) (%)
50
19.05 100.0
40 4.25 98.3
30 2 96.7
1.18 95.0
20 0.6 93.3
10 0.425 91.7
0.3 90.0
0 0.15 86.7
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
0.075 83.3
Opening size (mm)
Client: Mrs. Rukhshanda Javed, 306-H, Phase-VI, Your Ref.: Dated on 01/10/2020
DHA Lahore
Consultant: Test Results Submitted on: 10/10/2020
Project: Construction of a Residential Building at Depth
Plot#306, Sector-H, Phase-VI, DHA BH 02 SPT 2 6.0 ‒7.5
(ft)
Lahore
Sieve Analysis as Per
Gravel Sand Silt/Clay
100 ASTM D 6913
ASTM D 422
90 Hydrometer type:
Percentage passing by mass (%)
80 152H
Gravel (%) 1.0
70 Sand (%) 5.0
60 Silt & Clay (%) 94.0
Sieve Size Passing
50 (mm) (%)
19.05 100.0
40
4.25 99.0
30 2 99.0
20 1.18 99.0
0.6 99.0
10 0.425 99.0
0 0.3 99.0
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.15 97.0
Opening size (mm) 0.075 94.0
Client: Mrs. Rukhshanda Javed, 306-H, Phase-VI, Your Ref.: Dated on 01/10/2020
DHA Lahore
Consultant: Test Results Submitted on: 10/10/2020
Project: Construction of a Residential Building at Depth
Plot#306, Sector-H, Phase-VI, DHA BH 02 SPT 9 35.0 ‒36.5
(ft)
Lahore
Sieve Analysis as Per
Gravel Sand Silt/Clay
100 ASTM D 6913
ASTM D 422
90 Hydrometer type:
Percentage passing by mass (%)
80 152H
Gravel (%) 0.0
70 Sand (%) 90.8
60 Silt & Clay (%) 9.2
Sieve Size Passing
50 (mm) (%)
19.05 100.0
40
4.25 100.0
30 2 100.0
20 1.18 100.0
0.6 98.9
10 0.425 95.7
0 0.3 93.5
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.15 24.3
Opening size (mm) 0.075 9.2
Client: Mrs. Rukhshanda Javed, 306-H, Phase-VI, Your Ref.: Dated on 01/10/2020
DHA Lahore
Consultant: Test Results Submitted on: 10/10/2020
Project: Construction of a Residential Building at Depth
Plot#306, Sector-H, Phase-VI, DHA BH 02 SPT 10 40.0 ‒41.5
(ft)
Lahore
Sieve Analysis as Per
Gravel Sand Silt/Clay
100 ASTM D 6913
ASTM D 422
90 Hydrometer type:
Percentage passing by mass (%)
80 152H
Gravel (%) 0.0
70 Sand (%) 90.7
60 Silt & Clay (%) 9.3
Sieve Size Passing
50 (mm) (%)
19.05 100.0
40
4.25 100.0
30 2 96.9
20 1.18 94.8
0.6 93.3
10 0.425 91.7
0 0.3 89.6
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.15 15.5
Opening size (mm) 0.075 9.3
9
Light brown
SPT-3 9 8.52 9
loose clayey silt
Light brown 12
12 medium dense SPT-4 11 9.31
clayey silt
Depth (ft)
15
Light grey
15 medium dense SPT-5 12 8.42
Not Encountered
silty sand
18
Light grey
20 medium dense SPT-6 13 10.21 21
silty sand
24
Light grey
25 medium dense SPT-7 15 7.66
silty sand
27
Light grey
30 medium dense SPT-8 17 23.09 30
silty sand
Light brown 33
35 medium dense SPT-9 11 19.41
clayey silt
36
Light grey
40 medium dense SPT-10 16 5.69
silty sand 39
Light brown
9 loose clayey silt SPT-3 7 8.18 9
12
Light brown
SPT-4 9 9.44 12
loose clayey silt
Depth (ft)
15
Light grey loose
15 silty sand SPT-5 9 8.66
Not Encountered
18
Light grey loose
20 silty sand SPT-6 10 10.38
21
Light grey
25 medium dense SPT-7 13 6.97 24
silty sand
27
Light grey
30 medium dense SPT-8 13 20.51
silty sand
30
Light grey
35 medium dense SPT-9 16 22.94 33
silty sand
36
Light grey
40 medium dense SPT-10 17 6.13
silty sand
39