c



 ?

a. How far was the desire to punish Germany the main motive of the Allies in
deciding the terms of the Treaty of Versailles? Explain your answer. [12]

a
   


 


 

1. Each answer for each part question is at least 1.5 sides of foolscap
paper long.

2. Apart from the given factor, you have to explain 2 to 3 other factors
(depending on the topic involved).

3. Explaining IS NOT just copying the factor down. Explaining IS

WRITING DOWN THE FACTOR AND SHOWING HOW THE FACTOR
(IN THIS CASE ± PUNISHING GERMANY) IS RESPONSIBLE FOR (IN
THIS CASE ± DECIDING THE TERMS OF THE TREATY OF
VERSAILLES)

4. The weighing portion (or how far) is where you weigh how far the given
factor is the main motive/most or least important/etc as compared to the
1 or 2 other factors

The desire to punish Germany was one the motives of the Allies in
deciding the terms of the Treaty of Versailles. However, there were other
motives for the Allies in deciding the terms of the Treaty of Versailles.
These included the desire for peace and to prevent war from happening
again.

One of the terms of the treaty was the war guilt clause. The war guilt
clause was clearly designed to punish Germany because accepting the
blame for starting the war would mean that Germany was guilty of starting
World War I and would then have to accept any punishment given to it. The
Allies also made Germany pay huge sums of reparations to the Allies for
war damage, as part of the war guilt clause. This was clearly designed to
cripple the German economy and prevent Germany from recovering its
strength in the near future.

At the same time, Germany¶s armed forces were cut do wn in terms of men
and weapons, crippling its armed forces and making it vulnerable.
Germany also had land taken away from it and its overseas colonies were
taken away and re-distributed to various Allied countries to run under the
mandate system. These terms were designed to punish Germany by
reducing the country¶s power in terms of size and military might.
Furthermore, when deciding on the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, Britain
and France were quite insistent on punishing Germany, especially France
who wanted to cripple Germany¶s military power so as to prevent Germany
from invading it again.
 However, the Allies also decided on some terms of the treaty in order to
prevent war from happening again. The Allies wanted to set up the League
of Nations to promote collective security as a means to prevent future war.
Countries were expected to participate in collective disarmament and
reduce their weapons. Although Germany¶s armed forces and weapons
were cut, it was part of the overall plan to reduce wea pons globally, so the
terms of the treaty concerning the reduction of Germany¶s armed forces
and weapons were not designed to solely punish Germany.

b. ³The lack of an armed force was the main reason for the weakness of the
League of Nations in the 1920s´. How far do you agree with this
statement? Explain your answer. [13]
 
 a
   


 


 

1. Each answer for each part question is at least 1.5 sides of foolscap
paper long.

2. Apart from the given factor, you have to explain 2 to 3 other factors
(depending on the topic involved).

3. Explaining IS NOT just copying the factor down. Explaining IS

WRITING DOWN THE FACTOR AND SHOWING HOW THE FACTOR
(IN THIS CASE ± LACK OF AN ARMED FORCE) IS RESPONSIBLE
FOR (IN THIS CASE ± THE WEAKNESS OF THE LEAGUE OF
NATIONS)

4. The weighing portion (or how far) is where you weigh how far the given
factor is the main motive/most or least important/etc as compared to the
1 or 2 other factors
 
 The lack of an armed force was one the reasons for the weakness of the
League of Nations in the 1920s. However, there were other reasons for its
weakness such as membership within the League of Nations and attitudes
towards the League of Nations. 0c
 
  
  
 


 
 


 
  
 
 The League had no army or police force which meant that if a country had
acted against the League of Nations, the League could only punish it
through economic sanctions. This would mean that the League members
would stop trading with the offending state un til it backed down. However,
members states were not always willing to take this course of action
because it harmed their own economies. As a result of a lack of armed
force, p
?

?? p? 

?p
?p
p ?p ? 
? ? 
?p ?
p?
p? 
 ? ? p? 
? ?  

? ?  ?
?
 p
?p ? p
?p
?p ?
 



  Attitudes to the League of Nations worldwide were not helped by the fact
that signing the peace treaties at the end of the war meant accepting the
League. The treaties were not popular and the League was affected by this
unpopularity ? ?  p
? ?  p?  p? p. Furthermore, countries
who had agreed to the League, like Britain and France, did not take the
League seriously and conducted busin esses among themselves without
considering the views of the League,   ? 
? p? 
? ?  

?
The USA, who had insisted on having the League, was not a member.
Many countries felt that since the USA was not a member despite its
insistence on the League, they did not need to take the League seriously.
? ? 
p? p
? 

? ?  p? p
? 
 ? ? ? 
? ?
 

?
 
 The League¶s membership was another big weakness for the League. Not
only did the USA not join, but Germany, Austria and Hungary were not
allowed to. The exclusion of the defeated nations in World War One did not
make it focussed on peace either. { ? ? 

p
? ? 
? ?
 pp
?p ?p
? p
? ? ??{ ??p
? p
?
?
 ?

p
?p
? p?p p?p
?

? ?

?p?? 
? ?p? 
?
  
. It was also possible for countries to join and leave the League
quite easily which resulted in a constant shift of member states ? p?
 p? ? p
?p ?p
?p
?

?
  . Furthermore, nations left
the League if they felt it was not helping them or when the League objected
to their actions. {
? 

? ? p ? 
? 

? p? ?

? pp
?
 p ?

?p? ?p .
 
?