Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
M
Email: Jan.Hillman@lio.se icrodialysis has become a major tool metabolites and, in addition, have been of
in the study of brain biochemistry in clinical use in the neurointensive care unit
Received, February 17, 2004. both experimental settings and clin- (NICU) for patient monitoring (4, 10, 19, 21).
Accepted, January 20, 2005. ical practice (2, 8, 20). Until recently, only cath- Proteins act as important regulators of cel-
eters with membrane cutoff properties (20 kD) lular responses to injury. It seems likely that
permitting recovery of small tissue molecules cerebral microdialysis in humans, with stud-
were commercially available for use in hu- ies of macromolecules, such as cytokines, neu-
mans (9, 12). Even so, such catheters have rotrophic factors, or enzymes, would add a
profoundly influenced the study of ischemic new and important dimension to the under-
and other injuries to the human brain through standing of brain injury and subsequent re-
sequential analysis of neurotransmitters and parative processes (11, 15, 22). Microdialysis
DISCUSSION related to the fourth power of its radius, and the overall
hydrodynamic properties of the membrane are described by
The present study shows the filtration coefficient. The intraluminal and tissue hydro-
that microdialysis catheters static pressures are balanced against each other, and the col-
with high-cutoff membranes, loid osmotic pressure of the perfusate is balanced against the
allowing for sampling of cyto- colloid osmotic pressure of the surrounding extracellular fluid
kines and other macromole- (2, 20). Several approaches to balancing transmembrane fluid
cules, can be used in routine fluxes in microdialysis catheters with large pore membranes
clinical practice. The in vitro have been described for various tissues (1, 17, 23). However,
recovery data and the fact that these methods have shortcomings entailing limitations for
a significant amount of pro- their application in neurosurgical patients, particularly if the
teins could be recovered from goal is to use microdialysis as a clinical routine in an NICU
the extracellular fluid in neu- setting.
rosurgical patients clearly In the present approach, we chose to use widely available
point to the potential of such equipment favored by many neurosurgical clinics as part of
probes for extending the ex- their patient monitoring equipment. The outflow pressure of
ploration and monitoring of the microdialysis system was kept at the level of the intrace-
human brain biochemistry. rebral catheter, i.e., close to the zero level, thus avoiding the
With a standard mem- problems of a “push and pull” technique. Instead, the focus
brane, only very small net fil- FIGURE 3. Graphs showing tem- was on the choice of perfusion fluid and, in particular, the
tration of standard perfusion poral profile of intracerebral IL-6 colloid osmotic pressure of the perfusate. For routine applica-
(A) and the corresponding concen-
fluid occurs to the brain at tion, a commercially available pharmaceutical product would
tration of glycerol and the lactate/
the perfusion rate of 0.3 l/ pyruvate (L/P) ratio (B) in a patient be favored as perfusate. It is therefore encouraging that our
min (2, 8, 20). However, with (Patient D) with subarachnoid hem- data show that both 3.5% human albumin solution and RD60
the larger pores of the mem- orrhage (SAH). At the end of the effectively counterbalance the outward hydrostatic force over
brane used in the present first week, the patient developed the membrane segment, thereby minimizing net fluid loss.
study, there is an excessive clinical and Doppler-verified vaso- For both albumin and RD60, fluid recovery was comparable
loss of standard perfusion spasm, with an accompanying to that observed with standard perfusion fluid, with less in-
fluid to the surrounding tis- increase in IL-6 concentration. terpatient variation experienced with RD60. In the present
sue, as was also observed in study, no direct comparison was made with the standard
our pilot experience (see above). This kind of “leakage” has catheter (e.g., CMA 70), but the recovery of metabolites
been a major obstacle in attempts to develop a clinical routine seemed to be comparable to what has been reported previ-
microdialysis technique with high-cutoff membrane catheters ously for standard catheters (18, 19).
for the human brain (9, 23). An important finding of the study was that significant
The transmembrane fluid balance mechanism in a microdi- amounts of cytokines and other proteins could be sampled
alysis catheter is comparable to that of a single capillary. from every patient. With the possible exception of the S-100
Resistance to fluid flux through a single pore is inversely protein marker for brain injury (13), at present, proteins have
no defined role in clinical
multimodality monitoring of
the injured brain. However,
TABLE 2. Measurements of five different metabolites and comparison of recovery rates during it may well prove that some
microdialysis in nine neurointensive care unit patients with paired catheters, perfused with Ringer-
a macromolecular mediators of
dextran 60 or 3.5% albumin
early tissue injury or some
Metabolite Q (alb/RD60) 3.5% albumin RD60 mediators of early reparative
Glucose (mmol/L) 1.32 (1.04 –1.61) 1.9 (1.7–2.2) 1.7 (1.5–2.0) processes in injured tissue
can become sensitive indica-
Glutamate (mol/L) 1.53 (1.13–1.92) 149 (74 –224) 142 (69 –216) tors of the progression of in-
jury or the effects of therapy.
Glycerol (mol/L) 0.99 (0.88 –1.10) 216 (155–279) 236 (180 –292)
Among such macromole-
Lactate (mmol/L) 0.91 (0.85–1.01) 6.6 (5.9 –7.2) 7.8 (7.0 – 8.6) cules are chemokines and cy-
tokines (with powerful
Pyruvate (mol/L) 0.90 (0.85– 0.95) 230 (209 –251) 275 (246 –304)
proinflammatory and anti-
a
The relationship (quota) between concentrations of each metabolite in the respective perfusion fluid was measured at inflammatory actions); en-
each sampling interval, Q being the average value for all such paired comparisons (values given are mean and 95% zymes, e.g., cathepsins (likely
confidence interval; n ⫽ 114). alb, albumin; RD60, Ringer-dextran 60.
to play a role in apoptosis);
and a host of different neuro-
3. Billman GF, Hughes AB, Dudell GG, Waldman E, Adcock LM, Hall DM,
Orsini N Jr, Koska AJ, Van Marter LJ, Finer NN, Kulhavy JC, Feld RD,
TABLE 3. In vitro recovery of glucose, glutamate,
Widness JA: Clinical performance of an in-line, ex vivo point of care mon-
and glycerola itor: A multicenter study. Clin Chem 48:2030–2043, 2002.
% Recovery 4. Bullock RZ, Myseros JS, Marmarou A, Woodward JJ, Young HF: Evidence
Perfusion flow for prolonged release of excitatory amino acids in severe human head
Substance Albumin
(l/min) RD60 No. No. trauma. Ann N Y Acad Sci 765:290–295, 1995.
(3.5%) 5. Faden AI: Neuroprotection and traumatic brain injury: Theoretical option or
realistic proposition. Curr Opin Neurol 15:707–712, 2002.
Glucose 0.3 99.6 2 84.2 2 6. Fassbender K, Schneider S, Bertsch T, Schlueter D, Fatar M, Ragoschke A,
Kuhl S, Kischka U, Hennerici M: Temporal profile of release of
1.0 73.4 5 48.5 7 interleukin-1 in neurotrauma. Neurosci Lett 284:135–138, 2000.
7. Gozal E, Gozal D, Pierce WM, Thongboonkerd V, Schein JA, Brittain KR,
Glutamate 0.3 90.6 2 80.0 2 Guo SZ, Klein J: Proteomic analysis of CA1 and CA3 regions of hippocam-
pus and differential susceptibility to intermittent hypoxia. J Neurochem
1.0 71.8 5 42.5 7
83:331–345, 2002.
8. Hamani CL, Dujovny M: Microdialysis in the human brain: Review of its
Glycerol 0.3 97.7 2 83.8 2
applications. Neurol Res 19:281–288, 1997.
1.0 83.8 5 53.3 7 9. Hillered L, Persson L: Neurometabolic monitoring of the acutely injured
human brain. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 229:9–18, 1999.
a
RD60, Ringer-dextran 60. Both RD60 and 3.5% albumin were used as 10. Hillered L, Persson L, Ponten U, Ungerstedt U: Neurometabolic monitoring of the
perfusion buffers at both flow rates of 0.3 and 1.0 l/min. ischemic brain using microdialysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 102:91–97, 1990.
11. Holmin SS, Biberfeld P, Mathiesen T: Intracerebral inflammation after hu-
man brain contusion. Neurosurgery 42:291–298, 1998.
12. Hutchinson PJ, O’Connell MT, Al-Rawi PG, Maskell LB, Kett-White R, Gupta AK,
trophic factors likely to be instrumental in posttraumatic brain Richards HK, Hutchinson DB, Kirkpatrick PJ, Pickard JD: Clinical cerebral
microdialysis: A methodological study. J Neurosurg 93:37–43, 2000.
repair processes (5, 15, 16, 22). New techniques for analysis, 13. Ingebrigtsen T, Romner B: Biochemical serum markers of traumatic brain
e.g., proteomics, are likely to add considerably to this list (7). injury. J Trauma 52:798–808, 2002.
A potentially useful clinical marker, the cytokine IL-6, was 14. McGlennen R: Miniaturization technologies for molecular diagnostics. Clin
sampled from all patients. The normal extracellular concen- Chem 47:393–404, 2001.
15. Morganti-Kossman MC, Rancan M, Stahel PF, Kossmann T: Inflammatory
tration of IL-6 in the extracellular space of the human brain is
response in acute traumatic brain injury: A double-edged sword. Curr Opin
not known. The highest concentration measured in the present Crit Care 8:101–105, 2002.
study approached 25,000 pg/ml, but in most measurements, 16. Rothwell NJ, Hopkins SJ: Cytokines and the nervous system: Part II—
the concentration was considerably lower, not seldom being Actions and mechanisms of action. Trends Neurosci 18:130–136, 1995.
less than 1000 pg/ml. More interesting, however, was the 17. Sjögren FS, Andersson C: Technical prerequisites for in vivo microdialysis deter-
mination of interleukin-6 in human dermis. Br J Dermatol 146:375–382, 2002.
observation illustrated in Figures 2, A and B, and 3, A and B, 18. Ståhl NM, Hallström Å, Ungerstedt U, Nordström CH: Intracerebral microdialysis
namely, the indications that a detectable pattern of variations in clinical practice: Baseline values for chemical markers during wakefulness,
in IL-6 related to different intracerebral conditions may exist. anesthesia and neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 47:701–710, 2000.
19. Ståhl NU, Ungerstedt U, Nordström CH: Brain energy metabolism during
controlled reduction of cerebral perfusion pressure in severe head injuries.
Intensive Care Med 27:1215–1223, 2001.
CONCLUSION 20. Ungerstedt U: Principles and application for studies in animal and man.
J Intern Med 230:365–373, 1991.
To analyze the protein content, it is currently necessary to 21. Unterberg AW, Sakowitz OW, Sarrafzadeh AS, Benndorf G, Lannksch R: Role of
bring the sampled fluid to a laboratory. This definitely limits the bedside microdialysis in the diagnosis of cerebral vasospasm following aneurysmal
usefulness of bedside sampling of macromolecules. However, in subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 94:740–749, 2001.
the near future, one can expect development of new technologies 22. Wilcockson DC, Campbell SJ, Anthony DC, Perry VH: The systematic and
local acute phase response following acute brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow
(e.g., laboratory chip-based) to bring effective methods for the Metab 22:318–326, 2002.
bedside analysis of proteins and other macromolecules into the 23. Winter CD, Iannotti F, Pringle AK, Trikkas C, Clough GF, Church MK: A
clinical setting (3, 14). It may prove possible to find alternative microdialysis method for the recovery of IL-1, IL-6 and nerve growth factor
indicators of impending threats to the cerebral tissue that can be from human brain in vivo. J Neurosci Methods 119:45–50, 2002.
used on-line to select therapy tailored to the individual patient’s
needs. The present study clearly indicates that microdialysis Acknowledgments
could play a role in such development. We thank CMA Microdialysis, Stockholm, Sweden, for providing the cathe-
ters used in this study. We have no financial or other affiliation with any
manufacturer of the products used in the study.
REFERENCES
COMMENTS
1. Anderson C, Svensson C, Sjögren F, Andersson T, Wardell K: Human in
vivo microdialysis technique can be used to measure cytokines in contact
reactions. Curr Probl Dermatol 23:121–130, 1995.
2. Benveniste H, Huttemeier PC: Microdialysis: Theory and application. Progr
Neurobiol 35:195–215, 1990.
W hen a neurosurgeon thinks of cerebral microdialysis, he
or she most likely envisions patients who suffer from
severe traumatic brain injury or aneurysmal subarachnoid
hemorrhage. Part of the reason why champions of microdi- mined that the behavior of the assay seemed adequate to track
alysis have gravitated toward such conditions relates to the changes in this molecule in response to threatened ischemia in
nature of the substances that can be measured with this tech- patients with head injury or vasospasm owing to subarach-
nique. Limitations on the size of the molecules that can be noid hemorrhage. The authors further demonstrated that the
assayed have contributed to an emphasis on such molecules catheter under study was able to collect small molecules of
such as glucose, lactate, pyruvate, and certain neurotransmit- interest with reasonable recovery rates. A major difference
ters. Alterations in concentrations of these substances are as- between the standard catheter and the test catheter techniques
sociated with ischemia and other injuries to the brain. was the use of either an albumin or Ringer’s-dextran perfusate
In this article, Hillman et al. describe a simple yet important solution. These were better able to counterbalance the fluid
study of the effectiveness of a microdialysis membrane with a loss owing to larger pore size and hydrostatic effects. Metab-
larger pore size. These catheters enable the analysis of mole- olite recovery was better at lower perfusion rates.
cules up to 100 kD, as opposed to the cutoff of 20 kD for This article is well written and the information is of value to
standard catheters. By replacing the standard perfusion fluid those using microdialysis techniques in humans. The ability to
with either albumin or a Ringer’s-dextran solution, the in- evaluate changes in a variety of proteins in the human brain in
creased loss of fluid through the larger pores is offset by the clinical settings is a major advance that will open new avenues
higher oncotic pressure of the perfusate. of understanding of pathophysiology and normal brain func-
This demonstration of the technical feasibility of analyzing tion. This is a valuable contribution to our literature.
proteins and other larger molecules may help to extend the
horizons of cerebral microdialysis. As the authors discuss in Charles J. Hodge, Jr.
their conclusion, new technologies may facilitate bedside anal- Syracuse, New York
ysis of proteins and other macromolecules that have been
collected with the catheters described here. Further advances
in microdialysis methodology by the authors and by other
T his is an important article because, to my knowledge, it
represents the first published experience with the new
CMA 100 microdialysis catheter (CMA Microdialysis, Stock-
groups may improve our ability to care for our most critically
holm, Sweden), which allows time-dependent, relatively non-
ill patients.
invasive, in vivo measurement of small molecular weight
Alex B. Valadka proteins in the living human brain. This has never before been
Houston, Texas possible.
This newly designed catheter has not yet been approved for
T he development of microdialysis has contributed signifi-
cantly to our understanding of brain pathophysiology.
Because of the cut-off properties of the catheters, however, it
human use in the United States. This article is a demonstration
that in nine patients and over about 114 microdialysis mea-
surements, this technique seemed to be safe. Hopefully, as
has only been possible to recover relatively small molecules.
Here, Hillman et al. present an elegant study of 100 kD more experience is obtained with these catheters, they will
cut-off catheters. The investigation was done in 10 patients replace the conventional ones and allow parallel estimation of
who were experiencing coma after subarachnoidal hemor- proteins and peptides, as well as 3-carbon based substrates.
rhage or traumatic brain injury. One 100 kD cut-off catheter There is a revolution of interest in proteomics in the brain after
was placed parallel to a control catheter in each patient. a variety of brain insults, and this new catheter may make it
The authors show that even brief perfusion with the stan- possible to serially measure proteins in different parts of the
dard perfusion fluid caused significant loss of volume, living human brain. The authors have shown that the cyto-
whereas fluid recovery with albumin and RD-60 was satisfy- kine, IL-6, seems to fluctuate in broad agreement with the
ing. Extracellular proteins (including interleukin-6 [IL-6]) other microdialysis analytes. The theoretical possibilities with
were sampled from all catheters, and the authors noted pat- these techniques are enormous. For example, it is not known
terns of variations in the concentration of IL-6, apparently when the signal for apoptotic cell death is expressed in the
related to pathophysiological changes. Concentrations of glu- human brain after traumatic brain injury, although immuno-
cose, glycerol, lactate, and pyruvate were comparable to those histochemical studies on excised human contusion material
recorded by standard catheters. The new catheters will allow has shown that this process is prominent. With this new
recovery of an expanded fraction of the large molecules that microdialysis technique, it would be possible to measure pro-
we know from studies in preclinical models are important for apoptotic cytokines and allow early pre-treatment strategies
neuronal death or recovery. with, for example, IL-1 receptor antagonists, such as anakinra.
The authors have convincingly shown that the best dialy-
Iver A. Langmoen
sate perfusion fluid for these studies is probably Ringer’s-
Stockholm, Sweden
dextran 60. Normal saline or artificial cerebrospinal fluid is
Unfortunately, these experiments were quite badly designed. Al- fusion fluid that they have evaluated. Nevertheless, this data is still
though the authors implanted a standard CMA-20 microdialysis an important first start using a new technique, which may have
probe and the new CMA 100 probe together, they did not make great potential for the future.
direct cross comparisons for all the analytes of interest. The reasons
for this are not clear. Similarly, the authors do not make direct cross M. Ross Bullock
comparisons using this 2-probe design with the three types of per- Richmond, Virginia