Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
I am Plaintiff in the above reference action. With the Court leave, I herewith attach in
accordance with the Court’s order of allowing Plaintiff’s sur-reply to Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment, the original Affidavit of Philip Hans Jacobson that was annexed as a copy
to PLAINTIFF’S DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF THE NOTICE OF MOTION FOR
PERMISSION TO FILE A SURREPLY in that I received the Original Affidavit of Philip Hans
Jacobsen after the mailing of the underlying declaration; and in addition I annex hereto
PLAINTIFF’S JUDICIAL NOTICE OF RELATED FOIA APPEAL signed February 8,
2011, and by copy of this letter to Mr. Bowen.
---------------------------------------------------x
)
Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse, )
593 Vanderbilt Ave. – 281 )
Brooklyn N.Y. 11238 )
Telephone (845) 901-6767 )
Plaintiff, )
v. ) Civil Action No.: 08-2234 (RJL)
)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al. )
)
Defendants. )
)
---------------------------------------------------x
Plaintiff hereby provides the Court with notice of a recent appeal filed by
Pamela Barnett to the Department of State Appeals Review Panel in the
matter of the FOIA request with case no.: 200900535 - Consular and
Passport Records for Stanley Ann Dunham (aka Obama) for the years
1959-1962. Ms. Barnett’s FOIA was annexed as a related matter in Exhibit
6 thru 7 of PLAINTIFF’S SUPPLEMENT DECLARATION IN OPPOSITION
TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO DISMISS
signed August 18, 2010 and filed with the court. The appeal addresses
substantially similar questions to those raised in Plaintiff’s opposition to
summary judgment before the Court. Respectfully submitted,
RE: Case No.: 200900535 - Consular and Passport Records for Stanley
Ann Dunham (aka Obama) for the years 1959-1962
Mr. Chairman,
I being duly sworn depose and say under penalty of perjury the following from
Sacramento County, California. I am a U.S. citizen over 18 years of age, and I am a
retired military officer with over 14 years experience working with federal government
policies and procedures. In the event of my untimely death or mental incapacity I
transfer all legal rights associated with this FOIA request to Christopher Strunk of
Brooklyn, NY, who has an active lawsuit against the DOS to obtain Stanley Ann
Dunham’s passport records. My summarized updated more detailed demand for
records appears at the end of this appeal request. This appeal letter will be publicized.
To be legally eligible to be President of the United States both parents must be U.S.
citizen and the child must be born on U.S. soil according to past Supreme Court rulings
as well as U.S. historic definition. The DOS has not made a reasonable effort to locate
records requested after two long years of obstructing the release of records that would
help prove whether or not Barack Hussein Obama (aka Soebarkah, according to his
mother’s passport records) (Exhibit 1) was born in Hawaii in 1961 as he states and
also prove who his biological father is and what his citizenship was. The DOS has NOT
made a good faith effort to locate records to fulfill my FOIA request and I fear unknown
agents with access to DOS records have engaged in selective document destruction of
documents that would have satisfied my request and helped confirm whether or not
Obama was born in the United States and who his father was on his official birth and
passport documents.
I urge you to order U.S. Marshalls to immediately secure all of the remaining paper
passport and consular documents, microfilms, and indexes regarding records for
FOIA APPEAL #200900535 Page 1 of 6
Stanley Ann Dunham (aka Obama, further on to be referenced as SAD) before they
disappear as well. The processing of my original FOIA request is not complete as my
request for SAD’s consular and passport records was not addressed at all by the DOS.
“I request all United States Passport and all consular records for Stanley Ann
Dunham aka Stanley Ann Obama aka Ann Dunham aka Ann Obama for the years
of 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962. Stanley Ann Dunham (Name variation could be
Anna),who was born in Wichita, Kansas, on November 29th, 1942.”
The DOS mailed to me six SAD (aka Soetoro) passport related documents that I did
NOT request, and they do NOT address my original request.
In the letter from Jonathan M. Rolbin, Director, he states that these documents were
“responsive to your request.“ I think this is an attempt to by Rolbin to try to try to
placate me for DOS’s complete lack of response to what I requested because of the
very unreasonable two years of waiting for documents of monumental importance.
Rolbin also stated “Many passport applications and other non-vital records from
that period were destroyed during the 1980s in accordance with guidance from
the General Services Administration.” This generalized, uncorroborated statement
creates more questions than answers.
FOIA APPEAL #200900535 Page 2 of 6
document was not sent to me by DOS, because it is highly suspect as to its authenticity.
According to research (much of which is from DOS and National Archives and Records
Adminstration (NARA) policy and procedures), there was no such program to destroy
“many passport applications”. (See Exhibit 3 affidavits that discredit this DOS alleged
“purge project” program and alleged resulting “communication” from 1985.)
According to this alleged “purge project correspondence” the passport records that DOS
wanted to destroy were located at the FRC before they moved them to an undisclosed
location to be destroyed. Passport records after 1925 are maintained by Passport
Services until they are scheduled to be transferred to National Archives at 50 years or
destroyed at 100 years according to Records Schedules on DOS’s website. (Exhibit 5)
If this alleged communication were factually correct, this would have meant that there
was an unscheduled transfer of passport documents from DOS to the “FRC”, because a
move to an FRC or WNRC is not included in the Passport Record Schedules. (Exhibit 5)
Inform NARA's Life Cycle Management Division (NWML) in writing prior to the transfer.
This can be done by sending NWML a copy of the SF 135 submitted for FRC
approval before transferring the unscheduled records to the FRC. (Exhibit 6)
Services stores passport records there. (Exhibit 9) This factual information conflicts
with the “purge project communication” that stated records accumulated at the FRC
since 1925.
The WNRC and other FRC’s were specifically created to store and destroy federal
records on a large scale, so it is very odd that the WNRC or other FRC would transfer
125 million (or whatever the amount was, as it is unclear from the alleged
communication) records back to the creator agency for destruction. The DOS is in the
business of diplomacy, international travel and citizen assistance overseas, it is not
common place to perform large scale document destruction. The DOS cannot use the
excuse that they needed specific DOS expertise to do the destruction because they
allegedly hired 40 new people and did not even say if they were contractors or
employees. It is very unlikely that only 40 people handled combing through 125 million
documents to destroy “many” in only 9 months (22 working days a month average) -that
equals 3,125,000 records per worker or approximately 15,782 records each day to
evaluate and then destroy targeted records. This would be an impossible task.
The DOS also alleged “significant savings” as the reason for destruction. If that were
the case, why weren’t the alleged documents destroyed on site at the “FRC” to avoid
the presumably large costs to transfer them to another location and why were 40 new
people hired instead of using the trained staff at the “FRC”?
Again, if the alleged “purge project” existed it would have had to been the result of an
“Unscheduled” transfer that caused this communication to be created and issued to the
embassies. I request a copy of this alleged directive and the Disposition Authorization
Number assigned to it. I also request certified copies of the SF 135’s that would have
been filled out and recorded by the “FRC” aka WNRC as well as a copy of the written
transfer notification to NWML.
I require you to search the paper and microfilm archives, not just the database, because
obviously a database can contain errors or omissions. Barack Obama’s passport
records were infiltrated by a contractor for his political appointee, John Brennan,
the Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Homeland
Security and Counterterrorism. Coincidentally or not so coincidentally, the DHS also
refuses to release records regarding Obama – they refuse to release the immigration
records for Barry Soetoro, Barack Obama’s name while he lived in Indonesia with his
adopted step father Lo Lo Soetoro. (FOIA Lawsuit Allen v. DHS, 4:09cv00373).
The infiltration of Obama’s passport files proves that the DOS passport database is
NOT secure and former Secretary of State Condi Rice admitted that the Dept. of
FOIA APPEAL #200900535 Page 4 of 6
State cannot assure anyone that records in the database were not added,
changed, removed.
The DOS also hid the facts from the American people with extreme redactions of
the DOS investigation of the infiltration of Barack Obama aka Soebarkah aka
Barry Soetoro’s passport record file which includes birth place and parentage
information and passports issued from other countries. Lieutenant Quarles
Harris, Jr, with knowledge of this breach and cooperating with federal agents on
the investigation was murdered execution-style. This is public record.
If the alleged “purge project” was real, DOS should have kept SAD’s 1965 or earlier
passport applications because a pre-1967 application would have been the original
passport application with proof of citizenship. The “purge project” states “retaining
those records of permanent significance including those containing information on, or
documentation of, citizenship” which would include an original passport application.
Because the DOS said they destroyed Obama’s mother’s 1965 passport records
and possibly pre-1965 records, I request an unredacted full report of the
investigation of Obama’s passport records that could give insight of where
Obama aka Soebarkah aka Soetoro was born. This information will help to
provide insight of where Obama was born because the Governor of Hawaii Neil
Abercrombie has recently announced that he cannot locate an original birth
record for Obama, but he says he saw something “written down”. This is not
proof of birth in Hawaii to a American citizen father and mother.
To remain a natural born citizen a POTUS could not have become a citizen of
another country. The un-redacted investigation report could also let the
American people know if Obama was an Indonesian/British/Kenyan citizen at
birth (or through adoption) and past the age of 18 years old when he traveled to
Pakistan in the 1981 time frame when travel by U.S. citizens was highly
discouraged by the U.S. State Department, and when/if Obama legally regained
U.S. citizenship. If Obama had an Indonesian passport he would have had to
renounce his U.S. citizenship to have it.
6. SF 135s transferring "purge project" 1925-1970 year passport records from DOS
to "FRC".
7. SF 135s transferring "purge project" 1925-1970 year passport records from
"FRC" back to DOS.
8. FRC(WNRC) confirmation of destruction of documents in the "purge project".
9. FRC(WNRC) auto database printout and verification of passport applications in
the "purge project".
10.Transfer notification to WNRL for unscheduled record transfer of "purge project"
documents.
11.The alleged DirectiveIMandate for the "purge project" and the Disposition
Authorization Number assigned to it.
12. Report on the who, how, when, where of how the alleged "purge project"
communication was obtained for submission into the court case Strunk v. DOS.
According to DOS passport schedules and the National Archive, you should have all of
SAD'S passport applications and there is no credible evidence that anv of her
applications were leqally destroyed. Were Stanley Ann Dunham's physical passport
records selectively destroyed to hide facts regarding the Obama birth story and
citizenship of other countries, agents within the DOS would be aiding and abetting the
on-going Usurpation of federal Executive actions and would be complicit in high crimes
against the United States.
Any Presidential Pardon that Obama may extend to the agent(s) tampering with his and
his mother's passport records, won't hold up in criminal court when justice finally comes
back to the United States of America. These agents should come clean and
immediately hire a conservative law firm and then take evidence of a cover-up to the
Republican leadership of the House judiciary committee and the DOS Inspector General
to gain whistle blower protection. They should be deposed immediately for their
protection. The citizens of this country deserve to know the truth regarding Barack
Obama's natural born citizenship status as he continues to reduce our defenses as
China and Russia build theirs'. A false claims lawsuit also could net millions of dollars.
According to Barack Obama on his own campaign website he is only a "native" born
citizen because he was born with British citizenship and became Kenyan at 2 years old.
The Democratic party lead by Nancy Pelosi certified Obama as a natural born citizen
even though he was not according to his own admittance. The Democrats under the
leadership of Nancy Pelosi cannot be trusted. Eric Holder, Obama's Attorney General
cannot be trusted as he has seen evidence of Obama birth document and social
security fraud and has not done anything about it for over a year now.
Your immediate and quick action in response to my requests is imperative for the
security of our country.
EXHIBIT 1
DOS FOIA APPEAL #200900535
EXHIBIT 2
DOS FOIA APPEAL #200900535
Case 1:08-cv-02234-RJL Document 37-2 Filed 07/29/10 Page 26 of 28
EXHIBIT 7
UNCLASSIFIED 1 of 3
IN FORN CONSULS
.t, SUMt·1ARY.
UNCLASSIFIED 2 oi 3
2, 01\CKGROUND.
UNCLASSIFIED 2 of 3
Case 1:08-cv-02234-RJL Document 37-2 Filed 07/29/10 Page 28 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED 3 of 3
• FRAUDULENT CJ:'fI ZENSHll' C.~5ES OR CJI.SES JNVOLVING
F'Rl\TJDUJ.J-EN'f USE OF PASS E'ORT
• ·OUTSTANDING r.O;~NS
CLASSIFIED PIL!:~S.
S'l'J\TE 0361·16
5. CUf~RENT STA'l'U!-J.
UNCLASSTFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 3
DOS FOIA APPEAL #200900535
EXHIBIT 2
Butterdezillion’s note: The documents released are included on Scribd but are
redacted here for space concerns.
(BUTTERDEZILLION NOTE: ENLARGED TO SHOW DETAIL)
EXHIBIT 4
DOS FOIA APPEAL #200900535
U.S. Department of State Records Schedule
Chapter 13: Passport Records
EXHIBIT 5
DOS FOIA APPEAL #200900535
U.S. Department of State Records Schedule
Chapter 13: Passport Records
Passport Records
A-13-001- Passport Case Files - Passport and Citizenship Case Files, 1925-1970.
01a(1)
Description: a. Case files containing one or more of the following types of records: passport
applications; Reports of Birth of American Citizens Abroad; Certificates of Witness
to Marriage; Applications for Amendment or Extension of Passport; Certificates of
Loss of Nationality; and other supporting forms, documents and correspondence
pertaining to each case.
A-13-001- Passport Case Files - Passport and Citizenship Case Files, 1925-1970.
01a(2)
Description: a. Case files containing one or more of the following types of records: passport
applications; Reports of Birth of American Citizens Abroad; Certificates of Witness
to Marriage; Applications for Amendment or Extension of Passport; Certificates of
Loss of Nationality; and other supporting forms, documents and correspondence
pertaining to each case.
EXHIBIT 6
DOS FOIA APPEAL #200900535
FRC Unscheduled Records FAQs from the NARA Website
title for the records in item 6(f): series description on the SF 135.
• Include a folder title list of the box contents or equivalent detailed
the SF 135.
• See 36 CFR 1228.152 and 154, Code of Federal Regulations
Exhibit 3 SAD DOS FOIA Appeal Page 1 of 8
Subpart I -- Transfer of Records to Records Storage Facilities
§1228.150 Where can a Federal agency transfer records for
storage?
Federal agencies may store records in the following types of records
storage facilities, so long as the facilities meet the facility standards
in subpart K of this part. Records transferred to a records storage
facility remain in the legal custody of the agency.
(a) NARA records centers. NARA owns or operates records centers
for the storage, processing, and servicing of records for Federal
agencies under the authority of 44 U.S.C. 2907. These NARA records
centers include a National Personnel Records Center which contains
designated records of the Department of Defense and the Office of
Personnel Management and other designated records pertaining to
former Federal civilian employees. A list of NARA records centers is
available from the NARA web site
(http://www.archives.gov/locations/) and also in the U.S.
Government Manual, which is for sale from the Superintendent of
Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Mail Stop: SSOP,
Washington, DC 20402-9328, and is available online
(http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara).
(b) Records centers operated by or on behalf of one or more Federal
agencies other than NARA.
(c) Commercial records storage facilities operated by private entities.
Exhibit 3 SAD DOS FOIA Appeal Page 2 of 8
The following chart shows what records can be stored in a records
storage facility and the conditions that apply:
(1) Permanent records (i) Any storage facility that meets the
provisions of subpart K of this part.
(2) Unscheduled records (i) Any storage facility that meets the
provisions of subpart K of this part.
(ii) Also requires prior notification to
NARA (see §1228.154(b)).
(3) Temporary records (i) Any storage facility that meets the
(excluding Civilian Personnel provisions of subpart K of this part.
Records)
(4) Vital records (i) Storage facility must meet the provisions
of subpart K of this part and 36 CFR part
1236.
(5) Civilian Personnel Records (i) May only be transferred to NPRC, St.
Louis as required by this part.
§1228.154 What requirements must an agency meet when it
transfers records to a records storage facility?
An agency must meet the following requirements when it
transfers records to a records storage facility:
(a) Ensure that the requirements of subpart K of this part are met.
Special attention must be paid to ensuring appropriate storage
conditions for records on non-paper based media (e.g., film,
audio tape, magnetic tape), especially those that are scheduled
for long-term or permanent retention, as those records
typically require more stringent environmental controls (see 36
CFR parts 1230 through 1234).
Exhibit 3 SAD DOS FOIA Appeal Page 3 of 8
records storage facility and include a copy of the information
required by paragraph (c) of this section.
(c) Create documentation sufficient to identify and locate files.
(1) Such documentation must include for each individual records
series spanning one or more consecutive years transferred to
storage:
(i) Creating office;
(ii) Series title;
(iii) Description (in the case of permanent or unscheduled
records, the description must include a folder title list of the
box contents or equivalent detailed records description);
(iv) Date span;
(v) Physical form and medium of records (e.g., paper, motion picture
film, sound recordings, photographs or digital images);
(vi) Volume;
(vii) Citation to NARA-approved schedule or agency records
disposition manual (unscheduled records must cite the date the
agency notified NARA or, if available, the date the SF 115 was
submitted to NARA);
(viii) Restrictions on access if applicable;
(ix) Disposition ("permanent," "temporary," or "unscheduled; SF 115
pending");
(x) Date of disposition action (transfer to the National Archives of the
United States or destruction);
(xi) Physical location, including name and address of facility; and
(xii) Control number or identifier used to track records.
(2) In the case of permanent and unscheduled records,
provide copies of such documentation to NARA and advise
Exhibit 3 SAD DOS FOIA Appeal Page 4 of 8
NARA in writing of the new location whenever the records are
moved to a new storage facility.
(d) Ensure that NARA-approved retention periods are implemented
properly and that records documenting final disposition actions
(destruction or transfer to the National Archives of the United States)
are created and maintained as required by 36 CFR 1220.36.
(1) Retain temporary records until the expiration of their NARA-
approved retention period and no longer, except as provided for in
§1228.54.
(2) Transfer permanent records to the National Archives of the
United States in accordance with §1228.260.
(e) Provide access to appropriate NARA staff to records wherever
they are located in order to conduct an evaluation in accordance with
36 CFR 1220.50 or to process a request for records disposition
authority.
(f) Move temporary records that are subsequently reappraised as
permanent to a facility that meets the environmental control
requirements for permanent records in §1228.232 within one year of
their re-appraisal, if not already in such a facility. (Paper-based
permanent records in an existing records storage facility that does
not meet the environmental control requirements in §1228.232(b)
on October 1, 2009, must be moved from that facility no later than
February 28, 2010.)
Exhibit 3 SAD DOS FOIA Appeal Page 5 of 8
Federal agencies must use the following procedures to
transfer records to an agency records center or commercial
records storage facility:
(a) Agreements with agency records centers or contracts with
commercial records storage facilities must incorporate the standards
in subpart K of this part and allow for inspections by the agency and
NARA to ensure compliance. An agency must remove records
promptly from a facility if deficiencies identified during an inspection
are not corrected within six months.
(b) For temporary records, the agency must make available to NARA
on request the documentation specified in §1228.154. For
permanent records, the agency must transmit this documentation to
NARA (NWML) no later than 30 days after records are transferred to
the agency records center or commercial records storage facility. For
unscheduled records, the agency must transmit the information to
NWML with the SF 115 before the records are transferred as required
by §1228.154(b).
(c) Agencies must establish procedures that ensure that temporary
records are destroyed in accordance with NARA-approved schedules
and that NARA-approved changes to schedules, including the
General Records Schedules, are applied to records in agency records
centers or commercial records storage facilities in a timely fashion.
Procedures must include a requirement that the agency records
center or commercial records storage facility notify agency records
managers or the creating office prior to the disposal of temporary
records unless disposal of temporary records is initiated by the
agency.
(d) Agencies must establish procedures to ensure that the agency
records centers or commercial records storage facilities transfer
Exhibit 3 SAD DOS FOIA Appeal Page 6 of 8
permanent records to the National Archives of the United States as
individual series spanning one or more years and in accordance with
the provisions of §1228.272.
(e) Agencies must ensure that records that are restricted because
they are security classified or exempt from disclosure by statute,
including the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), or regulation are stored
and maintained in accordance with applicable laws, executive orders,
or regulations.
(f) Agencies must ensure that disposable records, including
restricted records (security classified or exempted from disclosure by
statute, including the Privacy Act, or regulation), are destroyed in
accordance with the requirements specified in §1228.58.
(g) Agencies must ensure that emergency operating vital records, as
defined in 36 CFR 1236.14, that are transferred to an agency records
center or commercial records storage facility are available in
accordance with 36 CFR part 1236.
Unscheduled Records
In order to transfer unscheduled records to an FRC, agencies
must: Inform NARA's Life Cycle Management Division
(NWML) in writing prior to the transfer. This can be done by
sending NWML a copy of the SF 135 submitted for FRC
approval before transferring the unscheduled records to the
FRC. Be sure to include on the SF 135 the date you notified NWML,
or include the number of a pending SF 115, Request for Disposition
Authority. NWML's address is: 8601 Adelphi Road, Room 2200,
College Park, MD 20740.
Include the official series title (if applicable) or a general descriptive
title for the records in item 6(f): series description on the SF 135.
Exhibit 3 SAD DOS FOIA Appeal Page 7 of 8
Include a folder title list of the box contents or equivalent detailed
records description. This description can be listed under item 6(f):
series description or included as an attachment.
Indicate "U" for unscheduled records under item 6(i) disposal date
on the SF 135.
See 36 CFR 1228.152 and 154, Code of Federal Regulations
(www.archives.gov/about/regulations/part-1232.html)
Exhibit 3 SAD DOS FOIA Appeal Page 8 of 8
EXHIBIT 7
DOS FOIA APPEAL #200900535
SF 135 Instructions for WNRC Page 1 of 2
FRC News & Events Contact FRC FRC Locations FRC Site Map
General Information
FRC Toolkit
FRC Communications Archive
Box Assembly
NARA Records Management Guidance
NARA Records Management Training
ARCIS
Learn about ARCIS
ARCIS FAQs
Sign up for ARCIS
Get training on ARCIS
ARCIS Manual
Forms
SF 135: Records Transmittal & Receipt
OF 11: Reference Request
More Forms
Contact Us
Account Representatives
Local FRC Directors
Find Your Local FRC
E-mail FRC
CIPS
Accessing CIPS
CIPS User Manual
CIPS Registration Form
Preparing the Standard Form 135 (SF 135), Records Transmittal and Receipt
http://www.archives.gov/frc/forms/sf-135-suitland-instructions.html 1/20/2011
SF 135 Instructions for WNRC Page 2 of 2
Item 6: (h) - Cite the appropriate schedule identifier and item number in your agency records schedule, job number or the General Records Schedule (GRS). For accountable officers' records,
cite the appropriate item from GRS 6. Also, use the General Records Schedules (36 CFR 1228.42) when dealing with records common to most offices such as contracts, civilian personnel
records, travel and transportation records. Contact center staff for additional information.
Unscheduled Record Series: Consistent with 36 CFR 1228.154(c )(vii), records centers can accept unscheduled record series that have a SF 115, Request for Records Disposition Authority,
registered and pending with NARA's Life Cycle Management Division (NWML). Customer agencies should cite the pending job number and the date it was submitted to NARA and the series
item that corresponds to the transfers. The customer should type "pending" in block 6h.
Also attach a copy of the pending job number with the SF 135.
Item 6: (i) Follow the instructions on your record schedule to compute the disposition date. Because disposal is accomplished in quarterly cycles (i.e. January, April, July and October),
advance the date to the beginning of the next calendar quarter to obtain the actual date of disposal. Permanent records are offered to NARA on an annual basis; no month is shown in the
disposition date field. Place "P" after the offer year.
Items to be Completed by Records Center:
Item s 4, 6j thru m.
Specific Instructions for the MS Word Electronic SF 135
Specific Instructions for the Electronic SF 135
NOTE: You must have a full version of Adobe Acrobat in order to save the annotations made to this electronic form.
In addition, NARA's records management team offers a comprehensive certification course for Federal employees on records management.
Archives.gov Home Contact the National Archives Privacy Policy Accessibility Freedom of Information Act No FEAR Act Top of Page
http://www.archives.gov/frc/forms/sf-135-suitland-instructions.html 1/20/2011
Exhibit 8
DOS FOIA APPEAL #200900535
Exhibit 6
Nobody knows Federal records better than NARA's Federal Records Centers Program. Since 1950, we
have safeauarded the nation's records. includina citizen tax returns. Official Military
Personnel Folders, Dassoort a ~ ~ l i c a t i o n and
s , TODSecret military records. Every day, NARA's
Federal Records Centers deliver o n the agency's mission t o provide ready access t o essential evidence.
We are Federal employees who proudly serve our Federal customers. We help customers navigate the
intricacies of Federal regulations t o ensure that t h e Nation's records are protected and remain
available for their scheduled life.
We maintain facilities that are fully compliant with that protect records from fire,
theft, pests, water damage and natural disasters.
We provide high-quality, cost-effective storage and servicing o f records for our Federal
customers.
We are developing state-of-the-art technology t o ensure t h a t we will be able t o continue t o
serve Federal agencies' needs for electronic records management in t h e digital era.
For more ~ n f o r m a t i o non the NARA Federal Records Centers Program, please contact us:
Federal Records Center
National Archives
8 6 0 1 Adelphi Road, Suite 3600
College Park, MD 20740
Telephone: 301-837-2950
Fax: 301-837-1617
E-mail:
Exhibit 9
DOS FOIA APPEAL #200900535
-
NARA Washington National Records Center (WNRC)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
February 8, 2011 with a copy of the appeal filed by Pamela Barnett to the
Department of State Appeals Review Panel in the matter of the FOIA request
with case no.: 200900535 - Consular and Passport Records for Stanley Ann
Dunham (aka Obama) for the years 1959-1962. That a complete set was
Brigham J. Bowen
Trial Attorney
United States Department of Justice
Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
P.O. Box 883, 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20044