Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Scope of practice[edit]
Further information: Neurology § Overlap with psychiatry
Ethics[edit]
See also: Ethical issues in psychiatry (disambiguation)
The World Psychiatric Association issues an ethical code to govern the conduct of psychiatrists (like
other purveyors of professional ethics). The psychiatric code of ethics, first set forth through the
Declaration of Hawaii in 1977 has been expanded through a 1983 Vienna update and in the broader
Madrid Declaration in 1996. The code was further revised during the organization's general
assemblies in 1999, 2002, 2005, and 2011.[20]
The World Psychiatric Association code covers such matters as confidentiality, the death penalty,
ethnic or cultural discrimination,[20] euthanasia, genetics, the human dignity of incapacitated patients,
media relations, organ transplantation, patient assessment, research ethics, sex selection,[21] torture,
[22][23]
and up-to-date knowledge.
In establishing such ethical codes, the profession has responded to a number of controversies about
the practice of psychiatry, for example, surrounding the use of lobotomy and electroconvulsive
therapy.
Discredited psychiatrists who operated outside the norms of medical ethics include Harry
Bailey, Donald Ewen Cameron, Samuel A. Cartwright, Henry Cotton, and Andrei Snezhnevsky.[24]
[page needed]
Approaches[edit]
Psychiatric illnesses can be conceptualised in a number of different ways. The biomedical approach
examines signs and symptoms and compares them with diagnostic criteria. Mental illness can be
assessed, conversely, through a narrative which tries to incorporate symptoms into a meaningful life
history and to frame them as responses to external conditions. Both approaches are important in the
field of psychiatry[25] but have not sufficiently reconciled to settle controversy over either the selection
of a psychiatric paradigm or the specification of psychopathology. The notion of a "biopsychosocial
model" is often used to underline the multifactorial nature of clinical impairment.[26][27][28] In this notion
the word model is not used in a strictly scientific way though.[26] Alternatively, a "biocognitive
model" acknowledges the physiological basis for the mind's existence but identifies cognition as
an irreducible and independent realm in which disorder may occur.[26][27][28] The biocognitive approach
includes a mentalist etiology and provides a natural dualist (i.e., non-spiritual) revision of the
biopsychosocial view, reflecting the efforts of Australian psychiatrist Niall McLaren to bring the
discipline into scientific maturity in accordance with the paradigmatic standards
of philosopher Thomas Kuhn.[26][27][28]
Once a medical professional diagnoses a patient there are numerous ways that they could choose to
treat the patient. Often psychiatrists will develop a treatment strategy that incorporates different
facets of different approaches into one. Drug prescriptions are very commonly written to be
regimented to patients along with any therapy they receive. There are three major pillars of
psychotherapy that treatment strategies are most regularly drawn from. Humanistic
psychology attempts to put the "whole" of the patient in perspective; it also focuses on self
exploration.[29] Behaviorism is a therapeutic school of thought that elects to focus solely on real and
observable events, rather than mining the unconscious or subconscious. Psychoanalysis, on the
other hand, concentrates its dealings on early childhood, irrational drives, the unconscious, and
conflict between conscious and unconscious streams.[30]
essionals, such as epidemiologists, nurses, or psychologists.