i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page i
Table of contents ii
List of figures iii
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Strategic Positioning of GE Healthcare 2
2.0 Critical Assessment of Resource And Value Systems of GE Healthcare 4
2.1 Resource Audit 4
2.1.1 Physical 4
2.1.2 Leadership 4
2.1.3 Financial Resources 5
2.1.4 Human resources 6
2.1.5 Technological Capabilities 6
2.1.6 Intangible Resources 7
2.2 Value Chain Analysis of GE Healthcare Value Systems 7
2.2.1 Logistics Inbound 7
2.2.2 Activities 7
2.2.3 Logistics Outbound 8
2.2.4 Sales and marketing 8
2.2.5 Services 8
3.0 Product/Service Portfolio (BCG Matrix) 9
3.1 Product/Service Portfolio 9
3.2 Matrix BCG 9
4.0 A Vital Review and Assessment for Strategic Directions 11
5.0 Conclusion 12
References

ii
 LIST OF FIGURES
Fig 1: GE Organizational Structure 2
Fig 2: Profit of General Electric Healthcare from 1997 to 2018 3
Fig 3: SWOT Analysis of GE Healthcare 4
Fig 4: Porters Value Chain Analysis 9
Fig 5: BCG Matrix Model 9
Fig 6: GE SBU Market status 2017-2018 10

iii
1. Introduction
GE Healthcare helps medical doctors to save more than 3,000 lives per day. As Paley
(1999) suggests, the extent of companies, the degree of SBUs and organizational level
are three main levels within an organization. This article reports on General Electric
Healthcare which is also one of General Electric's SBUs. The General Electric
Company's unit is GE Healthcare. It has an overall heading of more than 54,000
workers in over 100 nations that represent experts, clinics and patients. It is based in
the UK – with the GE business district outside the United States as a major business
district. It has estimated revenue of 19 billion dollars. Stanislav (2009) said the company
sells goods for smart computing, produce restorative reflective hardware like CT image
machines. Moreover, health advancements are being produced in clinical imaging and
advancement in data, medical diagnostics, and tolerant systems for observation,
diagnostics, medical disclosures, and bio-pharmaceutical materials.

The purpose of this research is to show and criticize GE electric systematically,

particularly in the business health unit. “Internet - based materials are the method
employed. The key method to explore would illustrate these sub-sections: GE
Healthcare Strategic Role, Essential Assessment of GE Healthcare Asset and Value
Structures, GE Healthcare Product/Portfolio Evaluation, GE Healthcare Potential
Strategic Development Review and Monitoring.

1
1.1 Strategic Positioning of GE Healthcare
Ugonna (2018) claimed that strategic positioning is a way of ensuring that organization
administrations progress sufficiently. Beginning in 2017, the net income of GE
Healthcare in 2018 was about $ 19.1billion and 19.7 billion and proceeded to rise to
seventh in sales generation amongst many other General Electric specialty groups. GE
Healthcare now has six main specialist divisions. There are the Multinational Diagnostic
Imaging Unit, Integrated IT Solutions (IITS), Business Unit of Medical Diagnostics,
Clinical Systems Unit, GE Healthcare Life Sciences unit and not the least GE
Healthcare Surgery unit in the whole country. Wickham (2001) said GE’s healthcare is
concerned about how GE distinguishes itself from its counterparts in a significant route
and provides an opportunity for particular consumer classes. Nevertheless, Porter’s
evaluation (1998) has shown that it can be conceived that it is competitive with
simplicity and that it is divided at the same time. However companies which want to be
all for every client can land right in the center.

2
Following the SWOT examination, Bezron (2008) stated that GE Healthcare provides
the strongest authority structure for an entity. It is shown in the figure below. Byrne
(1998) stressed that GE Healthcare HR strengthens the operational framework for
recruiting prospective workers (Charan, 2006).

The non-exclusive strategies of Michael Porter (2002) are used to build and retain
dominant position for the companies. At this period, he is utilizing his ordinary high
ground strategy in the healthcare department. As a crucial development element as
years passes, the General Electric Healthcare unit depends on extension, for instance.

3
2. Critical Assessment of Resource and Value Systems of GE Healthcare

2.1 Resource Audit

2.1.1 Physical

GE Healthcare is one of the GE firms with overall prestige in medical equipment. The
company has produced ECG machinery in more than 100 nations, ultrasound devices,
smart imaging equipment, radiology machinery etc.

2.1.2 Leadership

Louis (2019) said the GE health services had the highest management structure for
their operations. The help based and compelling style of Jeffrey Immelt turned it into an
imaginative society. This form of approach can also be used in numerous GE divisions,
including the Power Cell. Under Immelt, employees were motivated to undergo fully

4
supported workforce training (GE 2016). The earth needs an innovative and flexible
individual, as GE healthcare needs to evolve in reaction to global demands.
Grant's(2010) claimed, however that, in comparison, to Jeff Immelt, whose function is to
encourage others by empowering and referring to them at their stage, Jack Welch, who
led the business in 1981-2001 had an ability to fear workers. Stanislav (2017) added
that while the two men were equally persuasive, the style of kin cordial management of
his community produced a rather different mood in all GE SBUs, and was welcomed by
his subordinates' roles.

2.1.3 Financial Resources

GE healthcare also raised its sales by 5 percent and innovative dispatch products, such
as Pristina resistant led to revenue increases for mammography. Under Jeff Immelt's
government, Evelyn's (2017) research revealed that the usage of the sound imaginative
mind was a hope for the future, aimed at minimizing costs and improving the efficiency
and competitiveness worldwide. Sanjay, 2011 posted a profit of $16.997 million for the
financial year (FY) ended December 2007 and a growth of 2.7% over 2006. The desired
job place in 2007 was $3,056 million each; 2.7% less than in 2006. In the Cash Linked
Year (CY) ending in December 2009, this GE quality unit reported vocations worth
$16,015 million. This represented a decline of 7.9 percent over the financial year 2008.
The job leverage for the FY was $2.240 million in December 2009 and 15.1 percent
smaller than in the financial year 2008. Prasad (2017) argued that experts understand
the organization's diverse countries both internally and externally. Bernard (2018) has
studied this conflict by using the organization's appraisal and by linked to the Porter Five
Powers Concept of SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The
outcome shows that GE healthcare offers a strong financial structure for an
organization.

5
2.1.4 Human resources

GE's approach to handling human resources calls for the creation of talent for key
institutional needs (Chan 2011). It utilizes current assets and offers accurate knowledge
that is likely to shift. The GE Corporate Learning Center founded by GE develops
enterprise education programs that allow graduates to recognize and meet their
standards of the current global business climate. The world's director must know who to
acquire, how to generate global speculation between the positions and when to
establish products rather than modifying them for retail stores. This is the pledge of
Immelt to train workers (Evelyn, 2017). This develops pioneering credibility for
innovation to start opening practical training and contributes to performance application
and social change funding. It further ties and adapts the production of talent to the
human resource value chain by enhancing the retention of managers and pushing
managers to function.

2.1.5 Technological Capabilities

Technological changes and creative clients have continuously improved GE health care
particularly with competitors such as Siemens to produce the best outcomes at the
lowest cost (Ugonna, 2018). As a consequence, GE healthcare has taken up the task of
developed countries to promote future growth. A step like this is illustrated in GE
healthcare's ECG gadget. Intense measurements, particularly ACI-TIPI and gender
explicit interpretation, have been seen for the GE Marquette* 12sl* ECG checkup
system. The MAC* 5500 HD, with a superior role for pacemakers, ACS inspection and
client-detectable specific qualities, has been continuously updated to include the ECG
devices. (GE Annual report 2017).

Hospitals utilize GE-Healthcare technologies to provide better recording or photographs

in the detection and evaluation of an illness and increase their accuracy (GE
Healthcare, 2010).

6
2.1.6 Intangible Resources

Trefis Team (2004) said that the most obvious intangible resource in GE Healthcare is
its wretched credibility for creative work. This guided the corporation to strengthen its
progress targets. Samaha (2017) argued that the organization is taking a move ahead
in using money making big actions, speeding up thought and expanding the global
presence of the company, which is a vital aspect of the obligations to strengthen its
consumer commitments (GE-Healthcare, 2018). "Open, Private and Partner cooperation
(PPP)" to communicate data and obtain more rooted brand name GE Healthcare
interfaces clients, governments and programs (Berman 2014).

2.2 Value Chain Analysis of GE Healthcare Value Systems

The value chain study of Porter can be used to test GE healthcare value structures. The
first step in changing the layout of the Porter Value Chain is to understand the relevance
of the activities shown in the distribution phase for the product/administrations.

2.2.1 Logistics Inbound

The framework of the organization, tacit and linked, is unusually disintegrated. The GE
Healthcare Networks challenge numerous obstacles at the stage of product growth
(Fearne et al., 2017). The assessment of inbound communication implies that a
company reflects on any bit of transition from raw material to the finished product.
Several cases of ingoing collaboration include the retrieval of foul content, data points
and insiders who manufacture crude material and pieces.

Delloite (2017) has shown in his research that convergence and interdependencies are
central in a holistic setup of resource and capacity within the GE health care value
structure.

2.2.2 Activities

In 2015, GE healthcare partnered with ‘Teletracking’ to allow them to emphasize their

gain and improvement of workforce, by using tele-tracking's top-level long-term
organizational stream arrangements. Both firms collaborate on GE patient flow

7
responses on suitable teletracking arrangements with all concern customers. In
addition, GE and Teletracking strengthened operating outcomes thus reducing
suppliers' difficulty costs (Tele tracking Technology journal 2015).

2.2.3 Logistics Outbound

Outbound planning involves the activities which communicate the item to the client by
separate delegates. GE healthcare partnered with consumers to ensure a continuous
growth, and also reflect on the limitations in the current supply network, starting with an
apparent awareness of the cultural key and creative challenges. Certain exercises in the
production coordination involve products, packaging design, refining, shipment and
transportation for the purpose. GE Healthcare Systems study and strengthen the
production alignment in order to explore top sources to meet their market growth
targets.

2.2.4 Sales and marketing

However for the global marketing manager Stephanie, Meyer and Baker (2014) has
indicated that the change from GE Healthcare to an increasingly personalized marketing
approach and usage of computerization to track consumer behavior could improve
deals. The division is currently working on promoting former B2B or B2C programs,
rather than relying on a human-based approach, after a major re-establishment of the
display force at GE Healthcare. When talking about specialists in patient care, the
company collaborated with robotics programming engineer Marketo (Mindy Chahal,
2015).

2.2.5 Services

Cost initiative and differentiation technology are at the core of GE-Healthcare

organizations which aim to increase new customers. Although GE-Healthcare is the
expense boss, it has had the choice of logically moving stretched stuff on to clients that
render it really worthwhile compared with rivals like Siemens. The commitment of the
company to R&D can be endorsed by its continuous transactions by consumers who
are part of GE capabilities.

8
3.0 Product/Service Portfolio (BCG Matrix)

3.1 Product/Service Portfolio

Diagnostic & therapeutic infrastructure, IT, life sciences, medical and operation and
solutions are part of the comprehensive portfolio grouping. The mechanical contraction,
which enables more precise diagnosis and care, has relied on both the clinicians and
the hospitals. There was a mistake (GE Healthcare, 2010).

3.2 Matrix BCG

This segment uses the Bolton Consulting Group (BCG) matrix to evaluate the GE-SBU
in two separate ways (Rick De Vlieger 2019)

9
This main technique is being used to look at multiple management and commodity
transfer companies in the same way with multi-division, multi-product organizations. The
below estimates rely on the information provided by GE on its SBU in order to
understand the market position of GE healthcare.

Centered on the above table, the slower business and quick market income of GE
healthcare are impressive. Diagnostic and clinical devices such as MR frameworks,
CT/PET scanners and x-ray innovations have provided approximately $9.5 billion in
2017 and $9.7 billion in 2018 for GE health services. A further $6 billion was spent in
hospital machinery repairing, computer storage, and health care IT organizations while
GE 2017 won nearly $3.7 billion in medicines used in quiet correspondence and
different framework administrative procedures" (Forbes, 2017).

In 2018, there is a growing demand in life studies and goods, which has tremendous
influence in the production of cellular hardware, managing clinical photos and so on
whose revenue has grown by 7%, allowing the author to identify it as a cash cow
because of the greater slice of pie and the relatively advanced market.

Sales of electronic instruments have grown into a force for sales rise and are the star of
GE healthcare. This division has become a leading engine of development thanks to
ultrasonography and imaging products.

10
Due to investments in all respects due to the release of new goods and the lowering in
expenditures for research & growth, the low output of the diagnostics division in 2015
was attributed to the reality that the GE healthcare department concentrated on product
development and innovation as the peripheral expanding on the world market and
advancing the utilization of properties.

Through this BCG matrix, it can be inferred that a high portion of the whole sector is
usually not easy to earn. Companies with a limited part of the industry total can be very
useful.

4.0 A Vital Review and Assessment for Strategic Directions

The organization's growth is a technique (Dyson, 2004). GE Healthcare is an entity with

a technical outlook. Given the substantial amount of hazards and vulnerabilities that
delay the exhibition and competitiveness of the company, the organization has virtues
and advantages that allow it to do business in an extreme minute.

In the 1970s Alon, General Electric (GE) awarded McKinsey and Company the authority
to create a portfolio inquiry system for its specialty departments (Alon, 2012). This grid
or GE Matrix reflects a shift in the portfolio analysis by the Boston consulting group
(BCG). Also the GE McKinsey Matrix compares the commodity category with
consistency and rivalry on the market. GE Heathcare President and CEO Kieran
Murphy will remain as an independent entity driving GE Healthcare, retaining GE's
identity as laid out below:

"GE healthcare continues to stay at the leading edge in medicine. For instance, the Life
Sciences company is the maker of instruments and software used by pharmaceutical
firms to produce biological medicines – the fast-growing medicines category in the
modern world, eight of the Top 10 therapeutics currently on the market” (Kellner, 2018).
 
GE's Net Profit generated $3.5 trillion in 2017 and announced an advance of 5 per cent
and a gain of 9 per cent for the region at the same time. They expect to provide 20
percent of their contribution to the health care sector and to disperse the rest by means

11
of an appraisal exempt flow to GE financial practitioners. The organization, evolution
and pacing of these companies will eventually be decided and revealed but will still be
achieved by the end of 2020.

Flannery (2017) submitted that the business will not reach its goals without creativity
and R$D. In 2018, GE Healthcare acknowledged the statement of 25 new things within
the congress of the North American Radiological Society, which contributed to a
spectacular occasion (RSNA 2018).

It also reported that the organization began assisting the University of California in San
Francisco (UCSF) and the emergency clinic of Boston youth to utilize radiology logical
equipment. It also negotiated a two-way deal for provisions of $128 million in 25 years,
signed by the Turkish Ministry of Health.

5.0 Conclusion
The present primary evaluation of GE healthcare was seen in this article. This paper
finds an undeniable speed and incorporated undeniable online content in performing
this. The primary approach to assessment was based on the issues mentioned above.
The assessment and mechanical character of the company and its developments
throughout the year have facilitated this revitalizing path.

GE Healthcare has high fiscal efficiency and a capital base all over. In 2017 it stands at
$19.1 billion and $19.8 billion in 2018, for its latest revenue and capital base.
Furthermore the organization, which is extremely challenging to retake, is extraordinarily
small. This goal is done by preserving overarching systems of demand and value
development, higher learning and analysis that help improve, control partnerships and
close connections, differentiate goods and gain cost effectiveness. For example, GE
Healthcare has strong study and progress and puts assets into creative work every year
more than one enormous section of as much as a billion dollars. In addition, the annual
allocation to workforce recruitment and capability development is more than US$100
million.

12
The total vicinity and client base of GE Healthcare are impressive and essentially an
achievement in healthcare growth although restricted to the option of mid-point
business. This makes it important for the company to concentrate on a market place
around the world. Advancement and differentiation of goods are therefore required; in
any event, it should be careful as to how they are done, as they might be able to
produce negative effects. GE Healthcare offers significant change opens in industry
fields for example in Africa and distinctive Asia.

13
References

Alon, I. & Eugene, J. (2012). Global marketing. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Andrews, K. (1980) The concept of corporate strategy. 2nd edition. IL: Irwin Homewood.
Baker, M. J. (2014) Marketing strategy and management. UK: Macmillan International
Higher Education.

Baldwin, R. E., & Evenett, S. J. (2015) 'Value creation and trade in 21st century
manufacturing', Journal of Regional Science, 55(1), 31-50.

Bartol, K. and Martin, D. (1998) Management. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.

Bezron, H. (2008) 'General Electric Healthcare Systems Munich, GRIN Verlag', Havard
Business Review Case Study, 4(1) 2-3

Chan (2011) Deadly deception: General electric, nuclear weapons and environment.
UK: Newday

Chang, W., Ellinger, A. E., Kim, K. K., & Franke, G. R. (2016), 'Supply chain integration
and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis of positional advantage mediation and
moderating factors', European Management Journal, 34(3), 282-295.

Dekker, H. C. (2003) 'Value Chain Analysis in interfirm relationships: a field study',

Management accounting research, 14(1), 1-23.

Dyson, R. G. (2004) 'Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of

Warwick ',European journal of operational research, 152(3), 631-640.
Evelyn Neville (2017) Strategic Analysis of General Electric. Available
at:https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/strategic-analysis-of-general-electric
(Accessed 29 November, 2020).

Fearne, A., Garcia Martinez, M., & Dent, B. (2012) ‘Dimensions of sustainable value
chains: implications for Value Chain Analysis. Supply Chain Management ',
International Journal, 17(6), 575-581.

GE (2016) Annual Report. Available at https://ge.com/ar2016/assets/pdf/GE_AR16.pdf

(Accessed 29 November, 2020).

Gluck, F. W. (1985) 'A fresh look at strategic management',Journal of Business

Strategy, 6(2), 4-19.

Graham, H. (2008) Marketing strategy and competitive positioning. India: Pearson

Education.

14
Kotler, P. (1991) Marketing Management. 7th edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-
Hall.
Kellner, T (2018) GE, the Next Chapter: GE CEO Lays out plans for the future of the
company, Available at https://www.ge.com/reports/ge-next-chapter-ge-ceo-lays-plans-
future-company/ (Accessed 29 November, 2020).
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). 'Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing
new product development',Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111-125.

McKinsey & Company, Inc. (2015) Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of
Companies. IL: John Wiley.

Morrison, A., & Wensley, R. (1991) 'Boxing up or boxed in? A short history of the
Boston Consulting Group share/growth matrix',Journal of Marketing Management, 7(2),
105-129.

Paley, N. (1999) The Manager’s Guide to Competitive Marketing Strategies. Boca

Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Patel, V. (2006) GE Matrix 24 Success Secrets – 24 Most Asked Questions On GE

Matrix – What You Need To Know. England: Emereo Publishing.

Porter, M.E (2002) 'What is Strategy?', Havard Business Review, 3(1), 4-6.

Samaha, G. (2017) 'Bringing SWOT into Focus', Business Strategy Review, 14(2), 8-10.

Stanislav, R.(2009) 'Towards the growth of GE healthcare', Journal of Strategy

Management 3(1), pp.41-42

Trefis team (2014) GE healthcare division poised for continuous growth. Available at
https://www.trefis.com/stock/ge/articles/388973/pierrge-healthcare-division-poised-for-
continuous-growth/2016-12-02 (Accessed on 29 November, 2020).

Ugonna, O. (2018) 'Understanding strategic positioning in organizations', Emerald

insight Journals, 3(1), 1-2.

Weijrich, H. (1982) 'The TOWS matrix—A tool for situational analysis', Long Range
Planning Journal, 15(2), 54-66.
Weijrich, H. (1999) 'Analyzing the competitive advantages and disadvantages of
Germany with the TOWS Matrix-an alternative to Porter’s Model',European Business
Review, 99(1), 9-22.
Wilson, R., Gilligan, C., & Pearson, D. (1992) Strategic Marketing Management. Oxford:
Butterworth-Heinemann.

15
Wensley, R. (1981) 'Strategic marketing: Betas, boxes, or basics', The Journal of
Marketing, 173-182.

16