c


  

 

|
|

  |32-year-old Asian female; mother of the missing teen



||13-year-old Caucasian/Asian female; possible runaway or possible victim

|
  ||30-year-old Caucasian male; boyfriend of Mother; also claims paternity

à



à 
Caucasian male, age estimated to be between 40 and 45 years old, reportedly seen by

Mother and Alleged Father #2 behind the bushes in front of the family¶s home, smoking

cigarettes and peering in the windows. He has not been located at this time.

|
  ||47-year-old Caucasian male; has claimed paternity since Teen was born; no

prior criminal record; has disappeared since the kidnapping occurred.

2
 

c

  

 

Ñ |

System Crime scene Alleged Father Stalker¶s DNA

DNA #1¶s DNA

D13S17 55,58 55,58 12,16

FGA 81, 86 81,86 42,46

vWA 22,29 22,29 62,65

The above table shows an RFLP analysis of the crime scene DNA compared to the two

suspects, alleged father #1 and stalker. Alleged Father #1¶s DNA from saliva on the lip of a

Pepsi bottle he used the day before the disappearance. A cigarette butt found under the bushes of

the family home was identified as probably belonging to the Stalker. According to the results,

alleged father #1 was present at the crime scene. The probability of the DNA being the alleged

father¶s is 1/1,050,000,000. Furthermore the stalker innocence was proven by his parole officer

because they were in a meeting from 8:00pm to 9:30 pm while the abduction took place at

9:00pm. The mother and alleged father #2 also had alibis at the time their teen got abducted.

They had just gotten out of apple bees restaurant and a camera has them outside the restaurant at

9:04pm.

2
J 

c

  

 

System Mother Child Alleged father#1 Alleged father #2

D5S818 14 
  

D8S1179  
  

FGA  
  

D3S1358  
  



According to the above table, neither one of the alleged fathers could be excluded as the

biological father. The RFLP analysis was inconclusive. The DNA from the mother and alleged

father #2 was obtained via buccal swabbing. After the DNA isolation, the samples were cut into

smaller fragments using restriction enzymes Eco RI and HIND III. Their DNA was loaded into

an agarose gel and run for 30 minutes.

›
|

The alleged father is the prime suspect since his DNA was at the crime scene and also he is

nowhere to be found. The father of the teen is unknown.

I certify that the results were done in accordance to standard protocol of the city of Glendale and

are error proof to the best of my knowledge.

««««««««««««««««««..

Nicky Mutwol, PhD, Laboratory director

2
3 

c

  

 

2
^ 

c

  

 

2