Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 10
Modem Masters noomo Manin Jay Sasrmes Jonathan Cllr Densiba Christopher Nomis Buneieim Anthony Giddens Sexo Stephen Spender faauD Richard Woilheim Hepecesn George Steiner fone. ‘Asthcay Stor thwaance rank Kermode tems Robert Conquest Eevecsrxauss Edmund Leach ane David Metallan Nierascux —[P'Stem pany TA.Gay tracer Margaret Boden Porren Bryen Magee Puousr Roger Shattuck Snossuae fons Caller ween Donald MacRae Weinstcore Aas Pile Ueirecenarene David Peete Fetbeoming IAN Samuel Weber Lacan ‘Malcolm Bowie ace, es 1 jes [2 eS ligsr ira i ecanaPress | | | ell RR i ml | Contents | srpaeruncence suze Acton “ a 1 et and Lacan 1 sereonaat 2 vein te v ori an te 2 Lange edhe Unconacinn 44 stn em re ge 4 Symbol inssinay, tiacemeaa cate 8 a S$ TheMemingofthePhalls 12 ‘| See (Theory without End 158 Conca Renate sr in Chroclogy EE taster aiboseey {] Ripccsiteticne cing English mm I Index 3s scan 1 of what they want Poychoaalsis Is thus a science of feonmsa things ~ spench asthe veils for desi, ofthe Eennectioas between those dees tht ate diecty speak Sle and thane chat aren, and of the reipocal presuts that speaker exer on ech bes Tar rom being ula Lacan would claim, peychounalysisstades cha whi most dsinceivey human nurs bees, which [She constution of the speaking sujet sn relan to perf one as to define the moment a which man} coms human, we eam su) that 1s the moment whe, cwever lil be he entet ito the symblic elation’ 7 1581" “These, then, a some of the recurrent dferences sn snulanies berween Laca’s approach t9 mental scence Sod Fre. But Lacan's carer aa reader and reinventor Freud lasted forty yeas, and was uncommoaly fall of Imcyat Ihave dived thet carer ton He mma pat ‘nd to the Beto these {hal now tn 2 Inventing the ‘T’ [At thee forty on the afternoon of 3 August 1996, Lacan ‘began to deliver is paper on The Looking Glass Phase to the fourteenth Intemational Psychounlycal Congress, which being eld in Mvienbad The biliogepbeal Up placed athe end ofthe at eto of ers powaly Second the details of tne and date adi 9 doing sugests hat the paper was en even of tnusual bitret! gu face! Ip sersin respect sts sgniicance cannot be doubted, For oaths gtiion Lacan trade Refs enty nto the poychoanalyie movement. propounding + notion fa oman eltbood chat wa oe sconred in protesonal {eles for many yeast come and that was, la ancy of ‘ew ad nfs forms, #9 remain ative in hi oom thinking for the rest of is carer, But tao uch emphasis ‘placed on this inaugural moment the character comm leity of Lacan's ear psychounalye wnings i ikly to Hoon The papes of 1956-49 show Lacan engaged in merous iselleetaaldehetes and rere to 4 vary of Feeling influences" And they show him asthe precocious treator of a complete metapysical eye, much of which event aero dear “The papers in which Lacan's aw pict of eo formation ia drawn are Beyond the “reality prininle (1936) Family Complexes in the Formation of the fndiydeal (1938, ‘Remarks on pychicl czsaliy” (1986), “Agaesiiy 1 peyehoanalysr L948 and “The miror stages frmative se function of the (1989) eve works Cacane tne is ” can tlready confident and grand: the day of reckoning has ‘seed aot ony for lisa paychiaty,esociatona py. hology, dhe Cartesian tradition in Elsopenn plop, ind 1 number of revisioaist movements within psyche Says, ut for Feud hime fo far the founder of the pythoaalyee movement may be seen ave suk ‘ea rom the eanalzing power of his own eal insights ‘Ths sequence of papers contains an extensive cataloe of ther people's ear. Semetines an eror i recat, lec {nd sujet tapi correction, sometimes itis sacentaad so intiately woven into Earopean ang that it come {0 resemble an immovable propensity of the buh iad. Error af his second Kind can eal occr Inthe payelopy cal seiences, andes herefre ll he mote agen that ay ew theory af mental process should eek to expla fe Freud himself went wiong in special way He aterbated ‘owes aad responsible tothe ego thatthe egp wa fulpped to exis, and In doing 20 repeated ad 1 ‘edoed 2 casi European overvalstin ofthe indivi] Senscious mind. Feu eror was exteploal in that he Sone posse theory that could have coecte {tea pres special prominence during his pio to The ‘0 and the 1d (193), or iher im Lata’ coun that thelater Feud afar sedstivs ale sclution oan eas that the eaty Fred had proposed In The Interpretation of Drexms (1900 ands companion tie of lip sind jokes in the Thre Bsays an the Theory of Sexuality (908) nl the mujer ase histories, Freud bad roamed (be cviton of the human subject. Faced withthe ncaa fu ine that seared he eansctous snd Uncontcious portions of ‘the mind he ad challenged deeply planed view by ‘which the deseripion “mencal” was seemed with the

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi