Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Unit Human Systems Time Frame 15 minutes Commented [1]: Lesson ended up being ~16min, and
a few students commented that it felt a bit rushed -->
Lesson # and Title Digestion Begins Where Now?!? Developed by Erika Born This was too much material for a 15 min class.
Respond to question and begin to Ask the question: “What is the last meal 1 PP slides (2)
make connections to their own life/ you ate?” (T); explain that we will
Engage prior knowledge (W, H, T) discuss the beginning of the digestive
process - something your body is likely
doing now (W, H)
Respond to the question and/or listen Ask the question: “Where does 1 PP slides (3-4)
actively to others’ responses (W) digestion begin?” and tease out the Commented [7]: Did not need that much teasing, but I
correct response (i.e., mouth) (W) went on to elaborate that some think digestion begins in
stomach (address this misconception for anybody who
Actively listen and ask questions if they Explain directions for the Cracker Test 1 PP slides (5) might have held it).
arise (W, E) and answer questions (W, E)
Explore Participate in the Cracker Test and Watch students as they participate in 1 Saltines (1 per Commented [8]: Students liked this activity - thought it
share hypotheses for what happened the Cracker Test; direct students to student) was fun and good for engaging prior learning; physical
experience of digestion
with classmates after (H) taste for something sweet (H)
Commented [9]: Didn't get students to share
Follow along with the notes provided Explain chemical digestion in the mouth 1.5 PP slides (6-7) hypotheses - this could have made it more engaging.
in the lesson handout (E) (i.e., amylase) (E) Handout (1 per
Commented [10]: "Thumbs up when you taste sweet!"
student)
Pause, reflect on understanding, and Have students “show thumbs” - see 0.5
ask any questions (E-2) Stage 2 - to check understanding (E-2)
Explain
Follow along with the notes provided Explain physical digestion in the mouth 1.5 PP slides (8-9)
in the lesson handout (E) (i.e., chewing) (E)
Pause, reflect on understanding, and Have students “show thumbs” - see 0.5
ask any questions (E-2) Stage 2 - to check understanding (E-2)
Reflect on the question and send Explain to students that there is recent 1 PP slides (10)
teacher a message if interested in research of oral manifestations of GI Commented [11]: Some students liked this elaboration,
Elaborate
having a class on the topic (H, T) diseases and we can do a class on it but others thought it was too rushed to be meaningful
(e.g. no time to really discuss its implications)
next time if interested (H, T)
Participate in online quiz game (R, E-2) Lead students through the online quiz 4 PP slides (11) Commented [12]: Students enjoyed this activity
game and make observations of student Quiz game link
understanding (R, E-2)
Evaluate
Reflect on understanding and Revisit lesson objectives with students 1 PP slides (12)
accomplishment of objectives (E-2) to summarize the lesson (E-2)
Stage 4 – Reflection
Considerations Comments
Is there alignment between the first The desired results described in Stage 1 are assessed in Stage 2 and
three stages? taught/explored in Stage 3. Between Stage 1 and 2, the specific knowledge
objective is assessed with questioning throughout and the online quiz game.
Between Stage 2 and 3, all forms of assessment evidence are embedded
throughout the learning plan. Between Stage 1 and 3, the lesson objectives are
taught through the activities incorporated. Everything relates generally back to
the big ideas/enduring understandings with respect to the specific example of
structures in the mouth and the structure of the mouth.
How does the lesson design include Unfortunately, due to the length of this lesson and the nature of the material
a variety of teaching experiences: taught, this lesson does not include a great variety of teaching experiences.
Indigenous, multicultural, and Perhaps this is something I can look into in Week 3 and Week 4 of EDUC 465.
interdisciplinary activities?
Sources consulted Colbourne, H., Constantin, B., Dobell, D., Fehres, C., MacFadyen, D., Mason, A.,
Thomson, G., & Venter, A. (2007). Inquiry into biology. McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Lerner, S. (2018, June 6). How a 30-second cracker test reveals how much carbs
you can eat per day. Retrieved from
https://www.techtimes.com/articles/229568/20180606/how-a-30-second-
cracker-test-reveals-how-much-carbs-you-can-eat-per-day.htm
GI Society. (2020). Oral manifestations of GI diseases. Retrieved from
https://badgut.org/information-centre/a-z-digestive-topics/oral-
manifestations-of-gi-diseases/
Grade 11 U Biology. (n.d.). Misconceptions. Retrieved from
https://grade11ubiology.weebly.com/common-misconceptions6.html
Though I did address all of the objectives, I am less certain about whether or not students grasped the
lesson objectives. The online quiz gave me some data on their individual understanding of the topic at
hand; with that said however, I’m not sure that a multiple choice test that assesses lower-level thinking
skills of recall and understanding gave me accurate data. The UbD describes that in a valid assessment,
students who do not have an understanding of the topic should not be able to succeed (yet), and I’m not
sure that I can confidently say this after the delivery of my lesson.
I think next steps might be to try to design an assessment that will give me a better understanding of
students’ ability to transfer their knowledge to a novel situation. This could be a better “Elaborate” activity
for my lesson (e.g. some sort of research project?).
All in all, I think my lesson delivery went quite well, as the feedback I received was quite
positive. Students found the lesson to be engaging and fun, and appreciated my enthusiasm in its
delivery. However, upon my own reflection and after seeing the feedback from my PLC, there are
a few areas which I feel could improve upon and/or do differently next time.
Firstly, when it comes to time management, I think I tried to cram more into my lesson
than fifteen minutes worth of material. A few of my peers commented that though the lesson was
fun, it felt rushed, that I could have been more selective in the material delivered in order to
decrease the sense of urgency, and that I did not leave enough time for the completion of my fill-
in-the-blank notes. Though this feedback was specific to the lesson I delivered, I know that I
generally have the tendency to speak and move too quickly in my teaching. Because of this, my
Secondly, I tend to take over a bit too much in my teaching. I will explain my analogies,
my reasoning, and my thoughts without stopping long enough (or at all) to hear from my students.
A couple of my peers mentioned that if I had paused even a little to get students to share what they
students’ views to come through, I could also slow down my pacing, thereby making this a strategy
that could be used to address both of the first two areas for self-improvement.
Finally, in retrospect, I feel that I could have designed a better assessment tool to gauge
student understanding at the end of my lesson. Although the online quiz game was a highlight for
many of my students, it was only able to assess students’ lower-level thinking (recall/
understanding) as a multiple choice quiz. If I had taught this lesson to a class, I would design a
follow-up assessment to gauge higher levels of thinking (e.g., research project, debate, etc.).