Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ORIGINAL PROF-1122
DR. AHMAD SHERJIL MBBS, FCPS (PAEDS) DR. COL JAVAID IQBAL MBBS,
FCPS (GEN. MED)
Child Specialist, Head of Medical Department,
PNS Rahat Hospital, Karachi. PNS Rahat Hospital, Karachi.
vaccine in infancy. Many local studies, develops within 1 to 3 months after BCG
including vac cina tion. Some infants do not
1 4 6
develop a scar after vaccination.
RESULTS
Of all the infants,
first 250 infants
who fulfilled the
laid st
on community l e v e l .
x * Total number
of infants
5 selected by
. random
6 sampling – where , p = Results did reveal
7 250. percentage under a significant
) Total number consideration (i.e. proportion of BCG
of infants percentage of vaccinated infants
= who showed infants without without scar
8 reaction to BCG scar) n = formation, a
. vaccination -- number of finding which was
2 201. subjects in the in accordance
6 Total number sample (without with the initial
of infants scar) 95% presumption that
t who showed Confidence absence of scar
o no response Interval= p ±(2x formation after
to standard error ) BCG vaccination is
3 vaccination – not just an
0 49. observation of
. Percentage of parents of
9 infants with affected infants.
4 absence of
scar
formation
Results in tabulated Form
after BCG
vaccination –
19.6 %.
DISCUSSION
The goal of this study was to find
concrete evidence of the fact that a
Study implies that quality of vaccine, 7 years respectively. The scar could not
proper vaccine transport and storage be identified among 20 percent of the
need attention. There can also be an children vaccinated according to
undiagnosed underlying immune immunisation cards. This study shows
disorder in these 5,8
results almost similar to our study.
infants, responsible for absence of scar
Another study carried out by
formation . Local research work does Channabasavaiah
10
et al in
Banglore city, India . aimed at proving
mention absence of BCG scar effectiveness of BCG vaccination in
tuberculosis control. 26.4% children up
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,11,14
to age 12 year did not show vaccine
as an undeniable observation and
uptake. This survey also supports
emphasized on investigating such cases
findings of our study, despite the fact
but does not mention an exact figure or
that our study was carried out on a very
proportion for such infants (which was
small scale.
the objective of this descriptive study).
However, many Indian studies are
available that mention BCG scar as an
important indicator of immunization
against tuberculosis and provide survey
of appearance 8
of BCG scar in infants. Kaur et al in Delhi
carried out a study regarding
appearance of BCG scar in neonates of
varying gestational ages. This study
mentions the appearance of BCG scar in
about 60% of all subjects, three months
after vaccination. In this study, babies
were observed in a hospital setting but
were vaccinated at more than one place.
Compared to this Indian study, our study
shows a better result, probably because
vaccination in our subjects was done in a
single tertiary care hospital setting.
Pereira SM and colleagues found out a Secondly, the need for proper evaluation
percentage of 16 and monitoring of the BCG vaccination
17.7 in a similar study in Portugal. Garly programme is of paramount importance.
et al mentioned 17% BCG vaccinated There should be organized operational
infants not 17
to have research activities in order to yield
shown scar formation in a study done in information that could be used for
Sp a i n . improving the effectiveness of BCG
8,9
programmes.
This study has many limitations
including a small sample size collected
Thirdly, one important object of such
over a brief period of time. No record of
research is to devise methods for
parents was available who did not
detecting and defining local factors of
return after initial vaccination of their
possible epidemiological relevance in
infants. Once infants were documented
situations in which scarce resources
for improper vaccine uptake, they were
prevent more precise
not followed, monitored and evaluated
for cause of vaccination failure (beyond
the scope of this study).
CONCLUSION
This descriptive study concludes that a
significant proportion of infants does not
show tuberculin reactivity after
vaccination and that there is a need to
emphasize 2,3,5,14,16
evaluation and monitoring of these
i n f a n t s . Even a small sample of 250
infants collected over a short period of
two and a half months showed that
about nineteen percent of vaccinated
infants were without a BCG scar. It
indicates that a survey conducted for an
appropriate duration can reveal the true
magnitude
12,13,14
of
problem.
9,14
children. Ann KF. Med Coll 1998, 4
epidemiological surveillance. (3):24-6.
4. Manzoor H. Tuberculosis—a
hope to control (editorial). Med
Spectrum 2000; 21(9):1.
9. Chadha VK, Murthy MSK, Shashidhara AN. tuberculin reaction associated with
Findings of reduced child mortality in West Africa. A
BCG scar survey in Bangalore city. non-specific beneficial effect of BCG? Vaccine.
Indian Journal of 2003 Jun 20;21 (21 -22):2782-90.
Preventive and Social Medicine.1997
July28(3):81-9.
July,40(3):1 37-44.