Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Assistant U.S. Attorneys, and Jason Tisdale, the defendant, personally and by and
through his attorneys, John Val Wachtel and Charles M. Rogers, hereby enter into the
Criminal Procedure:
these offenses, and to being guilty of these offenses. The defendant understands that:
life, a two hundred fifty thousand dollar ($250,000) fine, a period of supervised
release of five (5) years, and a special assessment of one hundred dollars ($100); and
Counts 2 and 3 of the Superseding Information each have a maximum sentence of not
more than ten (10) years of imprisonment, a two hundred fifty thousand dollar
($250,000) fine, three (3) years of supervised release, and a special assessment of one
2. Factual Basis for the Guilty Plea. The parties agree the facts
constituting the offense to which the defendant is pleading guilty are as follows:
The Crips are a gang with members located throughout the United
States, including the District of Kansas. The Crips have existed in the
Wichita, Kansas, area since the early 1990s, and as such, are an
enterprise engaged in, and the activities of which affect, interstate
commerce. In Wichita, the Crips are organized into subsets. One such
subset is known as the Neighborhood Crips (“NHCs”).
The Crips, including the NHCs, are a group of men who associate
together for the common purpose of engaging in a course of conduct of
racketeering activity, more specifically, drug trafficking. This conduct
and activity included members and associates of the Crips conspiring to
distribute illegal drugs.
2
The defendant admits that there was a connection between this
conduct and the affairs of the NHCs. The defendant was an associate of
the NHCs, and became a member. The defendant admits that from 1997
to at least 2007 he, and other gang members he conspired with, engaged
in various activities in an effort to preserve, protect, and expand the
power of the gang. This was accomplished through different means.
3
1998. While in jail awaiting trial for the house robbery, NHC 1
contacted several people in an attempt to find someone who would keep
Tisha Jones from testifying in his robbery case.
The exact time the killing team left the N. Madison residence is
unknown. However, a surveillance tape from a local convenience store
located a little less than a mile from the murder scene, shows Mr. Tisdale
entered the store at approximately 11:42 p.m. on February 2, 1998.
Tisdale, wearing gloves, remained in the store for approximately 24
seconds. Tisdale asked the clerk for a ski mask. The store did not have
ski masks and the clerk told Tisdale that he only had stocking masks and
to try Wal Mart. Tisdale left the store without making a purchase.
Tisdale drove the stolen car to the residence of Tisha Jones and Keith
4
James. Once there, Tisdale remained in the car while NHC 2 and NHC
3 made entry into the house and murdered Tisha Jones and Keith James.
After the killings, Tisdale drove the car away from the murder scene. As
he drove, NHC 2 and NHC 3 threw the revolvers used in the murders out
the windows of the car.
5
any deals because Ms. Jones would not testify against him. Later, after
the murders, Colbert overheard NHC 1 take a call from a NHC member,
who informed NHC 1 that the killings had been done.
Many of the Bloods who left the Jungle Club ended up at Umanah
Smith’s house at 2531 N. Minnesota, a residence in north Wichita, where
an estimated twenty to thirty people partied both inside and outside.
They smoked marijuana, drank, and played music. The party eventually
died down leaving only Umanah Smith and fellow “Family Tyze”
member Kasseem Griegler sitting at the kitchen table listening to music
and a female friend of Smith’s, Destiny Livingstone, lying on a sofa in
the front room.
Among the many Crips present at the Jungle Club was the
defendant, Jason Tisdale. Tisdale was driven to the club by a fellow
NHC member, hereinafter referred to as “NHC 4”. At the Jungle Club
they met up with other NHC members. Following the fight, Tisdale was
driven from the club by NHC 4. They drove to a female’s residence,
where they obtained firearms. They then met with other NHCs to
discuss retaliation measures to be taken against the Bloods for the
disrespect shown to the Crips and the fight at the Jungle Club.
6
Umanah Smith was shot and killed. Smith had been sitting at the kitchen
table facing the intruders as they entered the kitchen. A .45 caliber semi-
automatic handgun, identified as his gun, was found near Smith’s body.
It was unholstered, but had no round in the chamber. Destiny
Livingstone saw the first intruder who came through the door. That
person, wearing a mask, shot at her and hit her in the finger. She then
laid down and played dead. Kasseem Griegler was seated at the kitchen
table with his back to the door and saw no one. He sustained a grazing
scratch/wound to the shoulder and serious wounds to his upper legs. He
left a blood trail from the kitchen, through the utility room, and into the
garage as he managed to drag himself from the kitchen into the garage
after the shooting ended and the shooters left. As the Crips left, Tisdale
was placed in one of the cars and taken to his sister’s residence by NHC
4. On the way to her house, Tisdale’s firearm was thrown from the
vehicle.
DNA testing was done by the police. The profile from a swab of
a blood spot found on the front porch of Smith’s house was compared to
that of Jason Tisdale and found to be consistent with the profile of Jason
Tisdale, therefore, he cannot be excluded as the source of this profile.1
Following the Smith murder, Jason Tisdale had a bullet in his right
foot. In November 2005, Tisdale sought a Social Security Disability
determination through the Kansas Department of Social and
1
Statistical Evaluation: The probability of selecting an unrelated individual at random
for the following population groups who exhibits a matching DNA profile is approximately:
Caucasian 1 in 1.13 septillion [#followed by 24 zeros]
Black 1 in 657 sextillion [# followed by 21 zeros]
Hispanic 1 in 4.37 septillion [#followed by 24 zeros]
7
Rehabilitative Services. He was sent to the Hunter Health Clinic,
Brookside for a physical. The notes from the visit reflect “right foot had
gunshot wound in August 2004 ... Didn’t go to ER for fear of getting
arrested.” From there, Tisdale was referred to the Wichita Clinic, where
the bullet was removed on January 24, 2006. Tisdale told the clinic he
sustained the gunshot wound in July 2004. The bullet was destroyed
soon after its removal. At no time was a report of the gunshot wound
made to Law Enforcement despite Kansas law requiring such a report.
disposition of the case, a sentence of one hundred twenty (120) months in prison on
each of Counts 1, 2, and 3, to run consecutively to each other, for a total sentence of
three hundred sixty (360) months imprisonment; a period of supervised release of five
(5) years on Count 1 and three (3) years on Counts 2 and 3, to run concurrently with
each other; no fine; and the mandatory special assessment of $300 to be paid during
the defendant’s incarceration. The parties seek this binding plea agreement as an
appropriate disposition of the case because it brings certainty to the sentencing process
and assures that the defendant and the government will benefit from the bargain they
have struck if the Court permits itself to be bound by the proposed sentence; the
interests of justice are served by the sentence, thereby assuring that the sentence is
consistent with the sentencing factors of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a); and if the Court does
not agree with the sentence, the parties may be restored to the positions they
maintained prior to reaching this plea agreement. This agreement centers on the
defendant’s agreement to enter his guilty plea as soon as the Court’s schedule permits,
8
thereby preserving valuable Court, prosecution, public defender, probation office,
belief that the proposed sentence does not offend the now advisory sentencing
guidelines, but because this proposed sentence is sought pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P.
sentence.
plea of guilty as set forth herein, the United States Attorney for the District of Kansas
also agrees to not file any additional charges against the defendant arising out of the
facts forming the basis for the Indictments, and to dismiss the Fifth Superseding
to the Court. The Court has no obligation to accept the proposed plea agreement
and sentence. It is solely within the Court’s discretion whether to accept the proposed
7. Withdrawal of Plea Permitted Only if the Court Does Not Accept the
Plea Agreement and Proposed Sentence. On the other hand, if the Court agrees
to be bound by proposed plea agreement and accepts the defendant’s plea of guilty,
9
the defendant will not be permitted to withdraw it. Only if the Court rejects the
proposed plea agreement will the defendant be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea.
mandatory special assessment of $100 per count will be entered against the defendant
at the time of sentencing. The parties acknowledge the defendant is without adequate
resources to pay the special assessment at the time of sentencing and agree to
recommend that the Court order payment to occur during the defendant’s period of
incarceration.
and voluntarily waives any right to appeal or collaterally attack any matter in
connection with this prosecution, the defendant's conviction, or the components of the
release. The defendant is aware that Title 18, U.S.C. § 3742 affords a defendant the
right to appeal the conviction and sentence imposed. By entering into this agreement,
the defendant knowingly waives any right to file and prosecute an appeal of the
sentence imposed. The defendant also waives any right to challenge a sentence or
determined in any collateral attack, including, but not limited to, a motion brought
under Title 28, U.S.C. § 2255 [except as limited by United States v. Cockerham, 237
10
F.3d 1179, 1187 (10th Cir. 2001)], a motion brought under Title 18, U.S.C. §
3582(c)(2) and a motion brought under Fed. Rule of Civ. Pro 60(b).
10. Waiver of FOIA Request. The defendant waives all rights, whether
agency of the United States any records pertaining to the investigation or prosecution
of this case including, without limitation, any records that may be sought under the
Freedom of Information Act, Title 5, U.S.C. § 552, or the Privacy Act of 1974, Title
5, U.S.C. § 552a.
United States will provide to the Court and the United States Probation Office all
This may include information concerning the background, character, and conduct of
the defendant including the entirety of the defendant’s criminal activities. The
defendant understands these disclosures are not limited to the count to which the
defendant has pled guilty. The United States may respond to comments made or
misstatements or inaccuracies. The United States further reserves its right to make
subject only to any limitations set forth in this plea agreement. The defendant also has
11
the right to provide information concerning the offense and to make recommendations
agreement binds only the defendant and the United States Attorney for the District of
Kansas, and that it does not bind any other federal, state, or local prosecution
authority.
discuss this case, the evidence, and this agreement with the defendant’s attorneys and
defendant is fully satisfied with the advice and representation provided by defendant’s
counsel. Further, the defendant acknowledges that he has had the plea agreement read
to him, understands it and agrees it is true and accurate and not the result of any
threats, duress or coercion. The defendant further understands that this plea
agreement supersedes any and all other agreements or negotiations between the
parties, and that this agreement embodies each and every term of the agreement
between the parties. The defendant acknowledges that the defendant is entering into
this agreement and is pleading guilty because the defendant is guilty and is doing so
Date:
D. BLAIR WATSON
Assistant U.S. Attorney
12
301 N. Main, Suite 1200
Wichita, Kansas 67202
(316) 269-6481
Kan. Sup. Ct. No. 09028
Date:
DAVID M. LIND
Criminal Supervisor
_______________________ Date:_____________________
BARRY R. GRISSOM
United States Attorney
Date:_____________________
JASON TISDALE
Defendant
13
Date:_____________________
JOHN VAL WACHTEL
Attorney for Defendant
Klenda, Mitchell, Austerman
& Zuercher, L.L.C.
301 N. Main, Suite 1600
Wichita, Kansas 67202-4888
(316) 267-0331
jvwachtel@kmazlaw.com
Date:_____________________
CHARLES M. ROGERS
Attorney for Defendant
Wyrsch, Hobbs & Mirakian, P.C.
1000 Walnut Street, Suite 1600
Kansas City, Missouri 64106-2140
(816) 221-0080
acquit@whmlaw.net
14