0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
73 vues2 pages
Functional assessment consists of the medical history, physical examination, and appraisal of muscle and organ function. Biochemical parameters should be examined in order to identify patients who are at increased risk for developing malnutrition and its complications.
Functional assessment consists of the medical history, physical examination, and appraisal of muscle and organ function. Biochemical parameters should be examined in order to identify patients who are at increased risk for developing malnutrition and its complications.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme DOC, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Functional assessment consists of the medical history, physical examination, and appraisal of muscle and organ function. Biochemical parameters should be examined in order to identify patients who are at increased risk for developing malnutrition and its complications.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme DOC, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Early detection of malnutrition in critically ill patients, whether preexisting or a
result of acute illness, enables prompt and aggressive intervention with supplemental nutrition. No single measurement or assessment tool can adequately characterize nutritional status, and the diagnosis of malnutrition remains somewhat subjective [22]. However, both functional and biochemical parameters should be examined in order to identify patients who are at increased risk for developing malnutrition and its complications [23].
Functional assessment — The functional nutritional assessment consists of the
medical history, physical examination, and an appraisal of muscle and organ function [24]. • Identification of preexisting malnutrition (ie, malnutrition that occurred prior to the onset of critical illness) should be attempted by careful attention to the history of present illness, the relevant past medical and surgical history, medications, social habits, and a focused dietary history. Obtaining this information from a critically ill patient frequently is impossible, but a patient's family may be able to provide data on recent dietary habits and/or weight loss. The degree to which the patient's usual weight deviates from estimated ideal body weight should be considered (show table 1), and the period of time over which the weight has changed is important in evaluating the severity of weight loss (show table 2) [25]. • Historical data should be used to estimate the nutritional consequences of the current hospitalization. Prehospitalization weights should be documented, and any weight changes since hospitalization should be noted and evaluated in the context of concomitant diuresis or fluid supplementation [10]. Critically ill patients frequently suffer from volume overload, making changes in dry weight difficult to assess. • Physical examination may suggest the presence of nutritional and metabolic deficiencies. Temporal muscle wasting, sunken supraclavicular fossae, and decreased adipose stores are easily recognized signs of starvation. Careful inspection of the hair, skin, eyes, mouth, and extremities can reveal additional stigmata of protein calorie malnutrition or vitamin and mineral deficiencies (show table 3) [26,27]. • An assessment of muscle mass and function can yield information about a patient's protein reserves and overall nutritional status. An estimation of muscle mass and fat stores can be obtained from anthropometric measurements such as arm circumference (show table 4). • The function of the cardiovascular, respiratory, and gastrointestinal systems should be evaluated both for evidence of malnutrition-related dysfunction and because functional deficits may affect the ability of the patient to tolerate nutritional supplementation. As examples, the large fluid volumes associated with parenteral nutrition may not be tolerated in the setting of impaired cardiovascular function, and a distended abdomen may makes tolerance of enteral supplementation less likely [24,27]. Metabolic assessment — Information from certain laboratory tests may supplement the functional assessment, and should be ordered on every patient as part of the standard nutritional evaluation. • Serum albumin concentration is the most frequently used laboratory measure of nutritional status; a value less than 2.2 g/dL generally reflects severe malnutrition. Despite its popularity as an indicator of nutritional status, the reliability of albumin as a marker of visceral protein status is compromised by its long half life of 14 to 20 days, making it less responsive to acute changes in nutritional status. Furthermore, the serum albumin concentration rises rapidly in response to exogenously administered albumin, and is altered in conditions such as dehydration, sepsis, trauma, and liver disease irrespective of nutritional status [24,27,28]. • Prealbumin (transthyretin) is a more reliable indicator of nutritional status than albumin because its half life of 24 to 48 hours makes the plasma concentration more reflective of the current nutritional state [24,27]. However, as is the case with albumin, the concentration of prealbumin is diminished by renal and liver disease. Transferrin has a half-life of 9 days, making it intermediate between prealbumin and albumin in its sensitivity for incipient malnutrition [27]. • Serum chemistry values are important in determining the specifics of nutritional support, but do not directly reflect nutritional status. Sodium, potassium, chloride, total carbon dioxide, blood urea nitrogen, glucose, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, iron, magnesium, calcium, and phosphate should be measured on admission and rechecked periodically (show table 5). • The adequacy of cellular immunity can be estimated through the measurement of total lymphocyte count (TLC) and by delayed type hypersensitivity testing with a series of common antigens (eg, Candida, Trichophyton, tuberculin, diphtheria, and a glycerin control) [29,30]. (See "Laboratory evaluation of the immune system"). Compromise of cell- mediated immunity due to malnutrition is suggested by a TLC 1000/mm3 or a lack of skin test induration greater than 5 mm above glycerin control at 48 hours, unless another cause of lymphocyte dysfunction is present. Delayed type hypersensitivity testing is least useful during an acute illness because cell-mediated immunity may be depressed in this setting even in the absence of malnutrition [31].