Symbiosis Institute of Business Management 2011

Table of Content
Introduction and Features...........................................................................................................................2
Keynesian Theory................................................................................................................................2
Milton Friedman..................................................................................................................................2
Causes of Stagflation...................................................................................................................................2
Stagflation during the 1980’s Recession..................................................................................................2
Supply Side Factors..............................................................................................................................2
Demand Side Factors...........................................................................................................................2
Policy Remedies...........................................................................................................................................2
Statistical Facts and Figures.........................................................................................................................2
Detailed Statistics........................................................................................................................................2
Investment...........................................................................................................................................2
The effects of American Stagflation on the US economy.............................................................................2
The effects of American Stagflation on the world economy........................................................................2
Supply side policies:.....................................................................................................................................2
GDP Gap..............................................................................................................................................2
Industrial capacity...............................................................................................................................2
Unemployment....................................................................................................................................2

The American Stagflation Episode of 1981 |

 Symbiosis Institute of Business Management 2011

Introduction and Features

Well, by the standards of a lot of countries, by Latin American standards, it wasn't so bad.

Paul A. Volcker

So how bad was it that made the then Federal Reserve chairman, Paul Volcker, to make this
pacifying statement?

Stagflation [stægˈfleɪʃən]: (Economics) a situation in which inflation is combined with

stagnant or falling output and employment

Noun [blend of STAGNATION + INFLATION]

The term was coined by a British politician Iain Macleod as, a situation when the inflation rate as
well as the unemployment rate in an economy is constantly high. Both these rates (their sum
defined by some as the ‘misery rate’) affect everyone, from the richest to the poor. Thus, the
gravity of such a situation cannot be understated. But what makes all the more peculiar is the fact
that any policy measure undertaken to arrest one rate usually worsens the other.
Economists offer two principal explanations for why stagflation occurs. First, stagflation can
result when the productive capacity of an economy is reduced by an unfavorable supply shock,
such as an increase in the price of oil for an oil importing country. Such an unfavourable supply
shock tends to raise prices at the same time that it slows the economy by making production
more costly and less profitable.
Second, both stagnation and inflation can result from inappropriate macroeconomic policies. For
example, central banks can cause inflation by permitting excessive growth of the money supply,
and the government can cause stagnation by excessive regulation of goods markets and labor
markets. Either of these factors can cause stagflation. Excessive growth of the money supply
taken to such an extreme that it must be reversed abruptly can clearly be a cause. Both types of
explanations are offered in analyses of the global stagflation of the 1970s: it began with a huge
rise in oil prices, but then continued as central banks used excessively stimulative monetary
policy to counteract the resulting recession, causing a runaway wage-price spiral.
The Gale Encyclopedia refers to stagflation being caused by an overheated economy. In periods
of moderate inflation, the usual reaction of business is to increase production to capture the
benefits of the higher prices. But if the economy becomes overheated so that price increases are
unusually large and are the result of increases in wages and/or the costs of machinery, credit, or
natural resources, the reaction of business firms is to produce less and charge higher prices.
Stagflation, first came into use in the mid-1970s, when in the US inflation soared to 12 percent
and the unemployment rate nearly doubled to 9 percent. This inflation was the result of the
quadrupling of oil prices by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC),
increases in the price of raw materials, and the lifting of Vietnam-era government-imposed Price

The American Stagflation Episode of 1981 |

 Symbiosis Institute of Business Management 2011
and Wage Controls. At the same time, the economy went into recession. In 1979 the high
inflation rate was sent spiraling upward when OPEC doubled petroleum prices after the Iranian
revolution. President Jimmy Carter established the Council on Wage and Price Stability, which
sought voluntary cooperation from workers and manufacturers to hold down wage and price
increases. The council could not control OPEC, however, and repeated oil-price hikes thwarted
the council's efforts. Years of continued inflation and high unemployment were one of the factors
that undermined the Carter presidency.
Stagflation at the time was an unexpected phenomenon due to the long held belief based on
historical data that both high inflation and high unemployment rates were mutually exclusive
events. This relationship was typified in the Phillips Curve, which depicted an inverse
relationship between the two. It seemed to suggest a short-run trade-off between unemployment
and inflation. The theory behind this was that falling unemployment might cause rising inflation
and a fall in inflation might only be possible by allowing unemployment to rise. If the
Government wanted to reduce the unemployment rate, it could increase aggregate demand but,
although this might temporarily increase employment, it could also have inflationary
implications in labour and the product markets.
According to D. Grubb, R. Jackman & R. Layard in the paper ‘Causes of the Current Stagflation’
(Review of Economic Studies 1982 XLIX) the cause of stagflation (and the failure of the Phillips
curve) can be explained by ‘a fall in the feasible rate of growth of real wages unmatched by a
reduction in the constant in the Phillips Curve.’
According to the same authors something happened to change the balance in the labour market
consistent with stable inflation. They cited, as explanation, the following points:
(i) In the Demand function for labour, the feasible growth rate of real wages consistent
with given employment had fallen.
(ii) In the Phillips Curve, there had not been a corresponding downwards adjustment in
the target growth rate of wages at the given employment of the 1980s.
(iii) And hence lower real wage growth had to be brought about either by a rise in the
unemployment or, since there was some ‘nominal inertia in the system, by a rise in
inflation, or by a mixture of the two.’
Thus the fall in feasible real wage growth had worsened the rate of change of inflation that was
available.
Keynesian Theory
As mentioned earlier, Keynesians till the 1960s were still unwilling to accept the possibility of
Stagflation, due to their belief in the Phillips Curve holding true universally.
The experiences of the 1970s and 1980s, however, had made it clear that this inverse relationship
between inflation and unemployment explained by the Phillips curve could not be taken for
granted and that this relationship was volatile. The grounds on which Keynesian theories were
based started seeming unstable, and the macroeconomics world began to doubt their consistency,
including the Keynesians themselves looking for reasons to explain the stagflation phenomenon.

The American Stagflation Episode of 1981 |

 Symbiosis Institute of Business Management 2011
Milton Friedman
They gradually began to accept the views put forth by the great economist Milton Friedman, who
suggested a vicious cycle of expectations of inflation giving rise to further inflation and shift in
the Phillips curve. According to Friedman, as inflation rose consistently over a period of time,
producers began to prematurely expect more inflation and in turn raised their prices, in turn
giving way to further inflation. These unrealistically inflated prices hampered revenues, pushing
down levels of employment, thus giving rise to twin evils of unemployment and inflation
simultaneously.
Friedman also understood that the Federal Reserve wields incredible power to increase or
decrease inflation in the U.S. In Friedman's worldview, inflation happens when the Fed allows
too much money to circulate in the economy. His formula for inflation: "Too much money
chasing too few goods."
The dual mission of the Fed is to keep prices stable and maximize employment. The strategy for
achieving this mission is called monetary policy. Modern monetary policy is heavily influenced
by Friedman's theories.
When the economy is growing, the Fed raises interest rates to limit the amount of money in
circulation. When the economy slows, the Fed lowers interest rates to encourage borrowing and
increase the amount of money in circulation. The goal is to strike a precarious balance where the
economy grows at a healthy rate without allowing inflation to get out of control.
In the 1960s, in an effort to maximize employment at all costs, the Fed lowered interest rates and
flooded the economy with money. This led to increased demand for goods and services and
rising prices. When it was clear in the 1970s that inflation was spiraling out of control, the Fed
and the federal government took the erroneous approach of pumping more money into the
system even as real economic output sagged. This fit Friedman's formula for inflation: too much
money chasing too few goods.

The American Stagflation Episode of 1981 |

 Symbiosis Institute of Business Management 2011

Causes of Stagflation
There are two main explanations of why stagnation exists.  Firstly, stagflation can occur when
the economy is shocked by a sudden decline in supply.  For example, stagflation can occur when
the price for a commodity (like during the Oil Shocks) rises dramatically in a short period of
time. The effect on the rise in the price causes a decrease in economic growth.
The second explanation offered by economists as to why stagflation occurs is simply bad
economic policy.  For example, allowing too fast of a growth in the money supply or over
regulation of markets.  Each of these factors lead to a dramatic rise in costs and prices and lead to
a loss of jobs. 
Whatever the cause, stagflation may take some hard work to correct, and it can be difficult to
ride out a period of stagflation.

Stagflation during the 1980’s Recession

Supply Side Factors
In our report, we will now discuss what caused the strain of Stagflation in the early 1980’s and
what caused both the unemployment and inflation to soar. There were several factors that played
a role although the principal culprit was rising energy prices.

In 1973, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) quadrupled the price of
crude oil. American consumers soon found the prices of gasoline and home heating fuels
increasing sharply, and American businesses saw an important cost of doing business, energy
prices were rising drastically. OPEC struck again in the period 1979–1980, this time doubling the
price of oil. Then the same thing happened again, although on a smaller scale, when Iraq invaded
Kuwait in 1990. Most recently, oil prices have been on an irregular up-ward climb since 2002
because of the Iraq war, other political issues such as the recent conflict in Egypt and the rest of
the Middle East, problems with refining capacity, and surging energy demand from China.

Now looking at the stagflation situation from a macroeconomic point of view, we know that
higher energy prices, we observed above, shift the economy’s aggregate supply curve inward in
the manner shown in the figure below. If the aggregate supply curve shifts inward, as it surely
did following each of these “oil shocks,”
production will decline. To reduce demand to the
available supply, prices will have to rise. The
result is the worst of both worlds: falling
production and rising prices.

This conclusion is displayed graphically in the

figure on the right, which shows an aggregate

The American Stagflation Episode of 1981 |

 Symbiosis Institute of Business Management 2011
demand curve, DD, and two aggregate supply curves. When the supply curve shifts inward, the
economy’s equilibrium shifts from point E to point A. Thus, output falls while prices rise, which
is precisely our definition of stagflation.

Stagflation is the typical result of adverse shifts of the aggregate supply curve.

The numbers used in the figure show what the big energy shock in late 1973 might have done to
the U.S. economy. Between 1973 (represented by supply curve S0 and point E) and 1975
(represented by supply curve S1 and point A), it shows real GDP falling by about 1.5 percent,
while the price level rises more than 13 percent over the two years. The general lesson to be
learned from the U.S. experience with supply shocks is both clear and important, namely

The typical results of an adverse supply shock are lower output and higher inflation. This is one
reason why the world economy was plagued by stagflation in the mid-1970s and early 1980s.
And it can happen again if another series of supply-reducing event takes place.

Demand Side Factors

To take this model further, let’s add demand factors that caused
stagflation as well, which we ignored above: While the
aggregate supply curve was shifting inward because of the oil
shock, the aggregate demand was shifting outward. In the
figure below, the black aggregate demand curve D0 and
aggregate supply curve S0 represent the economic
situation in 1973. Equilibrium was at point E, with a price
level of 31.8 (based on 2000 = 100) and real output of
$4,342 billion. By 1975, the aggregate demand curve had
shifted out to the position indicated by the brick-colored
curve D1, but the aggregate supply curve had shifted
inward fromS0 to the brick-colored curve S1. The
equilibrium for 1975 (point B in the figure) therefore
wound up to the left of the equilibrium point for1973 (point E in the figure). Real output declined
slightly and prices, led by energy costs, rose rapidly.

Therefore in conclusion, the causes behind the stagflation of the 1980’s causing the U.S.
economy to performed so poorly in the 1970s and early 1980s, when both unemployment and
inflation rose together. The OPEC cartel first flexed its muscles in 1973–1974, when it
quadrupled the price of oil, thereby precipitating the first bout of serious stagflation in the United
States and other oil-importing nations. Then OPEC struck again in 1979–1980, this time
doubling the price of oil, and stagflation returned. We now understand that what was happening
was that the economy’s aggregate supply curve was shifted inward by the rising price of energy,
rather than moving outward from one year to the next, as it normally does.Unfavorable supply
shocks tend to push unemployment and inflation up at the same time. It was mainly unfavorable

The American Stagflation Episode of 1981 |

 Symbiosis Institute of Business Management 2011
supply shocks that accounted for the stunningly poor economic performance of the 1970s and
early 1980s.

The American Stagflation Episode of 1981 |

 Symbiosis Institute of Business Management 2011

Policy Remedies
Whenever the 1980s stagflation is talked about there are two names which come to our mind
Reagan and Paul Volcker. Reagan the then president of USA adopted policy measures to pull the
economy out of stagflation and was supported in the bid by Paul Volcker the then chairman of
Fed.
The Stagflation posed a big question in front of the economists. Until the 1970s, many
economists believed that there was a stable inverse relationship between inflation and
unemployment. They believed that inflation was tolerable because it meant the economy was
growing and unemployment would be low. If the economy slowed, unemployment would rise,
but inflation would fall. Therefore, to promote economic growth, a country's central bank could
increase the money supply to drive up demand and prices without being terribly concerned about
inflation. These beliefs were based on the Keynesian school of economic thought, named after
twentieth-century British economist John Maynard Keynes.
In the 1970s, Keynesian economists had to reconsider their beliefs as the U.S. and other
industrialized countries entered a period of stagflation. According to the Keynesian economic
theories prevalent at the time, inflation should have had an inverse relationship with
unemployment, and a positive relationship with economic growth. Rising oil prices should have
contributed to economic growth. In reality, the 1970s was an era of rising prices and rising
unemployment; the periods of poor economic growth could all be explained as the result of the
cost push inflation of high oil prices, but it was unexplainable according to Keynesian economic
theory.
To get the economically devastating effects of inflation under control in the 1970s, the Federal
Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker put the monetarist theory into practice. Monetarists strong
believe that the economy's performance is determined almost entirely by changes in the money
supply. Volcker and Reagan together tried to reduce the inflation by reducing money supply in
the economy.Ronald Reagan promised an economic revival that would affect all sectors of the
population. He proposed to achieve this goal by cutting taxes and reducing the size and scope of
federal programs. Critics of his plan charged that the tax cuts would reduce revenues, leading to
large federal deficits, which would lead in turn to higher interest rates, stifling any economic
benefits. Reagan and his supporters, drawing on the theories of supply-side economics, claimed
that the tax cuts would increase revenues through economic growth, allowing the federal
government to balance its budget for the first time since 1969. The four pillars of Reagan's
economic policy were to

 Reduce government spending

 Reduce income and capital gains marginal tax rates
 Reduce government regulation
 Control the money supply to reduce inflation

In his stated intention to increase defense spending while lowering taxes, Reagan's approach was
a departure from his immediate predecessors. Reagan enacted lower marginal tax rates in

The American Stagflation Episode of 1981 |

 Symbiosis Institute of Business Management 2011
conjunction with simplified income tax codes and continued deregulation. Much of the credit for
the resolution of the stagflation is given to two causes: a three year contraction of the money
supply by the Federal Reserve Board under Paul Volcker, initiated in the last year of Carter's
presidency, and long term easing of supply and pricing in oil during the 1980s oil glut. The
Keynesian interpretation of Reaganomics is that the economic expansion is primarily or entirely
due to these factors, and not due to Reagan's policies. Reagan declared spending cuts for the
Social Security budget, which accounted for almost half of government spending, off limits due
to fears over an electoral backlash, but the administration was hard pressed to explain how his
program of sweeping tax cuts and large defense spending would not increase the deficit.
President Reagan lifted remaining domestic petroleum price and allocation controls on January
28, 1981 and lowered the oil windfall profits tax in August 1981, helping to end the 1979 energy
crisis. He ended the oil windfall profits tax in 1988 during the 1980s oil glut. With the Tax
Reform Act of 1986, Reagan and Congress sought to broaden the tax base and reduce perceived
tax favoritism, for which he was sharply criticized.

Reagan's policies are recognized by some as bringing about one of the longest peacetime
expansions in U.S. history. By early 1982, Reagan's economic program was beset with
difficulties as the recession that had begun in 1979 continued. In the short term, the effect of
Reaganomics was a soaring budget deficit. Government borrowing, along with the tightening of
the money supply, resulted in sky high double digit interest rates. Reagan allowed the Federal
Reserve to drastically reduce the money supply to cure inflation, but it resulted in the recession
deepening temporarily. The economy recovered in 1983 and 1984. A factor in the recovery from
the worst periods of 1982-83 was the radical drop in oil prices due to increased production levels
of the mid 1980s, which ended inflationary pressures on fuel prices.

By the middle of 1983, unemployment fell from 11 percent in 1982 to 8.2 percent. GDP growth
was 3.3 percent, the highest since the mid-1970s. Inflation was below 5 percent. When the
economy recovered, Ronald Reagan declared it was Morning in America. Reagan and Paul
Volcker thus stabilized the ship which was otherwise wavering in the sea and established
America as a super power back again.

The American Stagflation Episode of 1981 |

 Symbiosis Institute of Business Management 2011

Statistical Facts and Figures

1982 Recession and Recovery (in percent)

1980 1981 1982 1983 1984

Nominal Interest Rate (Three month 11.5 14.0 10.7 8.6 9.6
treasury bill rate)
Real Interest Rate 2.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 5.2
Full Employment Deficit 0.4 0.0 1.1 2.1 3.0
Unemployment Rate 7.0 7.5 9.5 9.5 7.4
GDP Gap 6.4 7.1 11.6 10.4 6.2
Inflation 9.5 10.0 6.2 4.1 4.4

In October 1979, the Fed acted, turning monetary policy in a highly restricted direction. The
monetary squeeze was tightening in the first half of 1980, at which point the economy went into
a mini recession. The reason for the sharp decline in activity was tight money. Because inflation
was still above 10% and the money stock was growing at only 5.1% in 1981 the real money
supply was falling. Interest rates continued to climb. Investment especially construction
collapsed.
Over the period 1981-1984, the real interest rate increased sharply even as the nominal rate
declined. The real cost of borrowing went up although the nominal cost went down. Investment
spending responded to both the increased interest rates and the recession, falling 13 percent
between 1981 and 1982 and investment subsidies and prospects of recovery, increasing 49
percent between 1982 and 1984. Also, the full employment deficit increased rapidly from 1981
to 1984.
The unemployment rate peaked at over 11 percent in the last quarter of 1982 and then steadily
declined under the impact of the huge fiscal expansion. Further fiscal expansion in 1984 and
1985 pushed the recovery of the economy forward, and the expansion continued throughout the
1980s.

The American Stagflation Episode of 1981 |

 Symbiosis Institute of Business Management 2011

Detailed Statistics

Let’s look at the graph of the levels of quarterly real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) levels,
seasonally adjusted and in billions of chained 2000 dollars.

As can be seen in the above graph, the real GDP from 1980 onward was fluctuating up and down
and on average not trending in either direction. It is perhaps best to refer to this condition as an
economic malaise rather than a recession because the economy was in difficulty more than a year
before it was officially an economic recession. The graph below shows what was happening to
investment purchases in 1979 through 1982.

This was the picture of investment conditions seen by economists and politicians in 1982. It was
not a comforting picture. The profile for mid-1981 to 1982 was especially disturbing. It is the
classic picture of a catastrophic collapse in progress. Although recessions are defined in terms of
output (GDP) they are felt in terms of the unemployment rate. Here are the unemployment
statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor.

The American Stagflation Episode of 1981 |

 Symbiosis Institute of Business Management 2011

U.S. Unemployment Rates Month-by-Month for the Period 1978-1984

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec

1978 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.1 6.0 5.9 6.2 5.9 6.0 5.8 5.9 6.0

1979 5.9 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.6 5.7 5.7 6.0 5.9 6.0 5.9 6.0

1980 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.9 7.5 7.6 7.8 7.7 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.2

1981 7.5 7.4 7.4 7.2 7.5 7.5 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.9 8.3 8.5

1982 8.6 8.9 9.0 9.3 9.4 9.6 9.8 9.8 10.1 10.4 10.8 10.8

10.
1983 10.4 10.3 10.2 10.1 10.1 9.4 9.5 9.2 8.8 8.5 8.3
4

1984 8.0 7.8 7.8 7.7 7.4 7.2 7.5 7.5 7.3 7.4 7.2 7.3

If we analyse the above statistics we see a perceptible rise in the unemployment rate in 1980.
Second the unemployment rate rose as the period of no growth in output persisted while the labor
force grew. Third the peak unemployment rates persisted after the economy began to grow again
in 1983 because of the backlog of unemployed workers that had accumulated during the period
of no growth. Fourth, and perhaps most important, after the recovery of growth the
unemployment rate stayed at a higher level than it had been at before the recession.

So far there has been no mention of the cause of the recession or malaise or whatever one wants
to call it. The cause clearly was Paul Volcker's tight money policy which the Fed carried out to
kill the chronic inflation that had developed in the U.S. economy during the 1970's. To show this
one needs the statistics on the nominal interest rate, the rate of inflation and the real interest rate.
The real interest rate is the key variable because it determines the level of investment. However,
the level of investment is an accumulation of work on past inititated investment projects as well
as the current ones so the level of investment has a lagged response to the real interest rate.

A subsidiary issue is the impact of the Reagan administration's fiscal policy. Some taxes were
cut, government expenditures in some fields were also cut and the net impact has to be evaluated.
There was also a trade deficit that worried politicians. The trade deficit was an effect of the high
value of the dollar relative to other currencies and this in turn was the result of the high real
interest rates in the U.S. compared to other countries.

Investment

The key variable affected by the high real interest rates was the level of investment purchases.
The American Stagflation Episode of 1981 |
 Symbiosis Institute of Business Management 2011

It is to be noted that the deficits of the Federal Government did not "crowd out" private
investment. On the contrary, the expectations of economic recovery and growth induced higher
levels of investment purchases. In other words, private borrowing was enticed in. Where did the
funds come from for businesses to borrow? They came from the increased savings generated by
the recovery of the economy. It is also to be noted that the increased deficits of the Federal
government did not lead to increased inflation. On the contrary during the time of the increased
deficits the chronic inflation of the 1970's collapsed and did not re-emerge.

The effects of American Stagflation on the US economy

The monetary authorities in the US made little effort to reassure Financial Markets. Instead due
to the gap between their behaviour and the stated intensions resulted in uncertainly less trust.
Monetary targets routinely announced and missed which causes movement in reaction to such
changes from the financial markets to protect themselves. This reaction in turn complicates the
Federal Reserve’s task of money control. The authorities and the markets simply chased each
other up and down the interest-rate gamut, each blaming the other for the trouble. This process of
mutual frustration by the authorities and the markets has damaging effects on the general
economy. This resulted in low confidence in business investments and consumers’ willingness to
spend. This according to the Macroeconomics theory resulted in a slow down.

The American Stagflation Episode of 1981 |

 Symbiosis Institute of Business Management 2011

The effects of American Stagflation on the world economy

The huge fluctuations in the US interest rates induced large fluctuations in the exchange rate of
the currencies of other nations and US dollars. Increasing US rates attracted huge financial flows
into US Dollar Investment. The resulting upward pressure in exchange markets pushed the dollar
up against the German mark from 1.71 marks in early January to 1.98 marks in early April. The
behaviour of the other European currencies against the dollar was similar, except in the case of
sterling, which remained high against the dollar right through the year 1980.Also dollar’s
unwarranted strength against sterling had undesirable consequences. German and Japan had been
faced with major outflows of financial capital attracted by high real interest rate available on
dollar assets. The resulting downward pressure on the mark and the yen has tended to raise the
domestic prices of oil and other imports, thus speeding inflation in both countries. In response,
the German and Japanese authorities sought to strengthen their currencies by abolishing controls
on capital inflows and by tightening their domestic monetary policies and supporting their
currencies on the exchanges. Such moves had a restrictive effect on monetary conditions in the
two countries, tending to worsen the business slowdown already developing there. The world
price of oil spurted from an average of $12.91 a barrel in the fourth quarter of 1978 to $23.54 in
the fourth quarter of 1979 to an estimated $33.00 in the final quarter of 1980. Once again the
authorities in all the industrial countries responded by tightening money supply more or less
simultaneously. The result was a second business slowdown after 1974.
Thus, the fluctuations in the rates in US impacted the exchange rates and domestic policies in
countries like Japan and Europe. Flexible rates provided countries with more independence but
in real or business cycle terms this wasn’t true. It was so because of the simultaneous oil shocks
and parallel policy responses to them but also because flexible exchange rates force other
countries’ central banks to respond quickly rather than with a lag to shifts in Fed Reserve’s
policy.
In 1980 dollars’ swift arise in exchanges in anticipation of Fed’s tightening and higher interest
rates forced the German Government to tighten the domestic credit, this caused a mild slow
down in business to become a recession of 1980-81. In Britain's case, though, the
synchronization with the European and U.S business cycles was more accidental. The British
recession was mainly the result of the financial markets' belief that Prime Minister Margaret
Thatcher means business and that she may yet succeed in making the Bank of England bring
down money growth and reduce inflation. This state of mind has led not only to the pound's
exaggerated strength on the exchange markets but also to an increase in the public's willingness
to hold pounds, which has reduced the velocity of circulation of money in Britain, thereby
slowing spending and lowering business activity.

Recovery from Stagflation

The American Stagflation lasted from 1970 till 1987. Stagflation was eradicated during the
Reagan era. It was done under Paul Volcker who was the Fed Chairman at the time. By
eliminating stagflation Volcker made the American economy swallow the bitter pill of recession.

The American Stagflation Episode of 1981 |

 Symbiosis Institute of Business Management 2011
Volcker’s solution to reducing high inflation was to slow down growth and force the economy
into a recession. The recession that followed was severe and lasted till 1984.

The first priority of the Fed was to lower inflation which stood at 13.5% in 1981. This was done
by effecting two changes. First was to slow down the rate of growth of money supply. It was
achieved through increasing the federal funds rate (interbank rate) from 11.2 % in 1979 to an
average of 20%. Second was to increase the prime rate to 21.5% in 1981 as well.

The role of the government is also very critical. Ronald Reagan’s policies later came to be
known as Reaganomics. He is said to have eliminated the causes of stagflation by instituting
supply side economics. His policies as per the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 were as
follows

Supply side policies:

1) Lower government spending by reducing expenditure on social programs
2) Reduce government regulation
3) Reduce personal and corporate taxes

Keynesian economics would show that lower taxes would increase the levels of inflation, but
that did not happen. But economist Arthur Laffer disagreed.

Lowering the tax rate to X’ would increase tax revenue. Lower tax rate would lessen avoidance
of taxes. Fewer transfer payments (reduced govt. spending) would result in greater number of
people working and greater number paying taxes. Hence the result is greater productivity and
therefore increasing GDP.

Therefore a tight monetary policy by the Fed led to two recessions between 1980-83. The short
term results were good

1) Inflation drops dramatically

2) Unemployment eventually came down
3) The longest expansion in peacetime history. (Known as the “Seven Fat Years”)

The American Stagflation Episode of 1981 |

 Symbiosis Institute of Business Management 2011
But some results were perceived to be bad. They are

1) Large deficit resulted (as inflation fell faster than expected). These deficits were expected
to crowd out investments
2) Trade deficit increased. High interest rates with low inflation made US a good investment
hub for international investors. This pushed up the value of dollar making imports
cheaper & exports expensive.

Even today there are different takes on whether the policies used were pure Keynesian or not.
But the fact is that now people agree with the policy decisions taken then. The argument is that
when Reagan left office the average US citizen earned about 25% more than the average citizen
of Germany & Japan.

Comparison between current and 1981-82 recessions

The early 1980s recession was a severe recession in the United States which began in July 1981
and ended in November 1982. The primary cause of the recession was a contractionary monetary
policy established by the Federal Reserve System to control high inflation. The double dip
recession of the early 1980s as it is called was actually two separate recessions interrupted by a
very short (two quarter) expansion. Since the expansion was so short and the causes of both
recessions were the same it is considered to be one for most of the analyses.

According to the NBER, a non- profit body which decides the recession the current recession is
considered the longest recession so far. It started in December 2007 continued till June 2009, for
a period of 19 months as compared to the 16 month duration of the 1981-82 recessions.

The American Stagflation Episode of 1981 |

 Symbiosis Institute of Business Management 2011
However, just considering that the recession of 1980 is worse than the current recession because
it was a combined effect of two subsequent recessions won’t be right and needs a deeper insight.
A comparison between the two recessions can be done on the basis of GDP Gap between the
actual real GDP gap and the potential GDP, industrial capacity, unemployment rate and the
payroll job losses

GDP Gap
The best way to look at the depth of the recession and see how much excess capacity the double
1980-82 recession created compared to the current recession is to look at the GDP Gap or the
gap between actual Real GDP and Potential Real GDP as shown in the chart:

In the chart, we can see how the recovery from the 1980 recession was incomplete and the
economy was significantly below potential real GDP when the 1981-82 recession began. But we
had something similar in this cycle. If we observe we will find that the 2002 -2009 expansion
was so weak that real GDP never got back to potential just as it did not in 1981. But if we
assume that second quarter real GDP falls at a 4% annual rate it creates a GDP Gap of -8.4% as
compared to -8.3% at the 1982 bottom. So even when we build into the comparison that the 1980
-82 recessions was really two recession, we still come to the conclusion that the depth of this
recession was about the same as the combined 1980-82 recessions.

Industrial capacity
A second way of measuring the depth of a recession is to compare how much excess industrial
capacity is created which we can do by comparing the manufacturing capacity utilization during
both the durations:

The American Stagflation Episode of 1981 |

 Symbiosis Institute of Business Management 2011

The chart shows how in both the 1981 recovery and the 2002-2008 expansions the economy
failed to recover to prior peaks and entered the recessions with significant excess capacity
already existing. But during the recession of 2007 manufacturing capacity utilization is at 65.7%
(as on Jan 2009 data) versus 68.6% at the 1982 bottom. So again this measure shows the depth of
the current recession to be greater than the combined 1980-82.

Unemployment
During the recession of 1981-82 the employment conditions deteriorated throughout the year.
The unemployment rate in the U.S. reached 10.8% in December 1982 much higher than at any
time in post-war era. Job cutbacks were particularly severe in housing, steel and automobiles. By
September 1982, the joblessness / unemployment rate had reached 10.8%. Twelve million people
were unemployed, an increase of 4.2 million people since July 1981.

Talking about the current recession, from the start of the recession to the end of May 2009, total
nonfarm payroll employment declined by about 6 million, or 4.3 percent. In the same period, the
unemployment rate jumped from 4.9 percent to 9.4 percent, amounting to almost 6.9 million
additional unemployed workers.

The following chart shows that the unemployment rate of the 2007 recession is going steep in the
negative direction.

The American Stagflation Episode of 1981 |

 Symbiosis Institute of Business Management 2011

In a typical business cycle, the unemployment rate starts to increase right around the beginning
of the recession and does not show any sign of decline until the recession is over. The rate at
which the unemployment rate increases over the course of the recession is a good measure of
how severe a downturn is

It can be said that the job losses associated with this recession already have been deeper because
the downturn started with a lower unemployment rate than in the 1981-82 slump as. The rise in
employment in this particular recession is of the fact that the companies are over cautious about
hiring and also the growth of the economy has come to a standstill with absolutely no
investment. Capital spending and inventory policies had also been conservative.

The American Stagflation Episode of 1981 |