Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 10

Index

Achtenberg, Ben, 229, 235, 249 183, 192-98, 2 0 2 , 236, 250, 260, 266-
actors, Navajo, 139, 181-89 68, 272-73
Albert, Ethel, 75, 131 bio-documentary films: as art
analysis of data from this study, form, 261-62; as a communica-
132-41 tion mode, 19-20; defined, 24; as
Anderson, Mike, 54-57, 69, 79, 82, distinct from documentary
95-96, ~ - 6 171-79,
, 186-89, 193, films, 24-27; group-made, 228-51;
206, 209, 226, 238, 264, 266, 271 as a tool in culture study, 256-57
Anderson, Terry Lee, 69 Birdwhistell, Ray L., 14
Annenberg School of Communi- black teenagers’ films, 47-48, 101,
cations, 174, 181, 197, 239, 246 169-71, 189, 228-51
Antelope Lake, 129, 171, 205, 206, 271 Bouman, Jan C., 13
anthropology’s use of film, 12-20 The Boys on the Seesaw, 265-66
The Ants, 266 Brown-Lennenberg study, 175
Appeal of film, 55, 257-58 Burnsides, Husky, 4
art, bio-documentary film as a Burnsides, Mabel, 67
form of, 261-62 Burnsides, Mark, 72
Asch, Timothy, 13 Burnsides, Ruby, 72
Astrov, Margot, 199
cademes, 89-93
Balikci, Asen, 13 camera, teaching Navajo to use,
Baloo, Aka, 148 81-86
Baloo, John, 146, 148 Chomsky, Noam, 17, 44, 137
Barnett, Homer G., 30 Clah, A4 50,52,56-~7,60-62,75,79,
Bateson, Gregory, 13 82, 86, 94-97, 101-9, 127, 144, 154-
Benally, Floyd, 68 59, 178, 183, 202-3, 208-27, 266,
Benally, Susie, 56-57, 67-69, 80-84, 271-72
101,108-26,144,148-49, 15.5, 178-797 close-ups of faces, 152-65
282 ) Index
code: analysis of, 140-41; in visual 261-62; group-made, 228-51; socio-
communication, 43-47 documentary, 24--27,231; as a tool
codes in context theory, 133-41, 233 in culture study, 256-57
cognitive processes: Navajo, 193- Don’t Make a Good Girl Go Bad, 234,
98; and visual communication, 250
28 dream interpretation, an’d film,
Collier, John, 34 258-60
Collier, John Jr., 13, 46
communication: breakdown be- economic obligations, Navajo
tween different groups, 251; view of, 182-89
codes, 17-20, 43-47, 133-41; and edemes, 89-93
cognition, 28; cross-cultural, 12- Edgerton, Robert B., 13
13; and dream interpretation, editing of film, 86-89, 166-80,
258-60; via film, 11-20; research 190-98
on, 6, 13-14, 43-47; verbal vs. Eisenstein, Sergei, 21
visual, 258 Ekman, Paul, 14
community: how chosen for this equipment handling, 190-98
study, 47-52; response to films, “Ethnography of Communica-
128-31, 140 tion,” 133
Community Film Workshop ethnography of filmmaking, 231-33,
Council, 229 248
content analysis of films, 4 6 4 7 eventing, 199-207
context: and code theory, 133-41; as
filmmaking element, 233; this face close-ups, 152-65
study’s observations on, 139-41 Fejos, Paul, 13
Cornell University Medical Col- Ferguson, Robert, 2 2 9
lege research, 29 field research, suggestions on fur-
cultures: communication be- ther, z s z - 6 ~
tween, 12-13; and structuring of film: cademes, 89-93; code, 43-47;
reality, 253-54; variance in communication via, 16-20,43-47;
filmmaking among, 228-51, 256- content analysis, 46-47; develop-
57; and visual communication, 28 mental structure of, 89-93; and
dream interpretation, 258-60;
data analysis for this study, 132-41 edemes, 89-93; editing, 86-89,
Dedicated Soul Sisters, 234, 250 166-80, 190-98; ethnography of,
developmental structure of a film, 231-33, 248; grammar of, 45; loca-
89-93 tions, 238-41; motion aspects of,
Documentary Film Laboratory, 199-207; motivating appeal of, 55;
250 Navajo taught to use, 74-127;
documentary films: bio-documen- parallel to language? 21-30, 43-
taries, 19, 24-27, 228-51, 256-57, 47; primitive peoples’ use of,
Index 283
260-61; how is reality presented image: in group films, 244-48; or-
in? 11-20; semiotics of, 27; se- ganization, 195-98; study of the,
quencing of, 166-80;splicing, 88- ‘5
89; structuring of, 11-20, 89-93, innovation: guided, 29; Navajo ac-
16680, 244-48; symbolism of, ceptance of, 74-75
16680; themes in, 248-51; univer- interdisciplinary research, 132-33
sal appeal of, 257-58; vidistics of, Intrepid Shadows, 130, 154, 2 0 5 , 208-
27 27, 261, 271-72
films: documentary, 19, 24-27. 2 2 8 - “Intrepid Shadows” (poem), 101-2
51; group-made, 228-51; Intrepid
Shadows analyzed at length, 208- Japanese, and Navajo as alike,
27; Navajo, summarized, 263-73; 61-62
of Navajo making films, 123-27; John Adair Hangs Out the Laundry,
new cinema, 247-48; practice, 265
263-67; premiere of Navajo’s, The Jungle, 250
128-31; where available, %
Flaherty, Robert, 261 Kahn, Alta, 67, 84, 101, 111-26, 148-
Flaherty Film Seminars, 61 49. 250, 260, 272-73
Kessler, Hope, 18
Gajdusck, D.C., 14 “The Killing of Tracking Bear,”
Gardner, Robert, 13, 46
148
Gerbner, George, 47 Kluckhohn, Clyde, 39
Goldschmidt, Walter, 13
Gombrich, Ernest H., 19 Langer, Susanne, 259
Goodenough, Ward H., 30
language: acquisition, 17, 43-47,137;
Goodman, Nelson, 21
film as if it were, 21-30; how term
grammar of film, 45
used in this study, 13% verbal VS.
grammaticality, 23, 138
visual, 258
group filmmaking, 228-51
Larson, Rodger, 7, 229-30, 249
Laybourne, Lawrence, 7
Haile, Berard, 213
learning situation, 139
Haley, Jay, 229, 234
Hall, Edward, 110, 156 Leighton, Alex H., 13
handling of equipment, 190-98 Leighton, Dorothea C., 13, 39
Hani, Susumi, 62 Leites, Nathan, 47
Harrison, Randall P., 14 Lenneberg-Brown study, 175
Hoijer, Harry, 178-79, zoo, 204 LCvi-Strauss, Claude, 143-44
Holmberg, Allan R., 29, 30 linguistic approach to film, 21-
Houston Community Center, 233, 30
250
locale restrictions in Navajo film,
Hymes, Dell, 132-33, 230 181-89
284 Index
locations, cross group comparison economy, 36-37; history, 33-34;
Of, 238-41 “identity crisis”, 40; innovations
“long journey” myth, 205-7 accepted by, 74-75; and Japanese
as alike, 61-62; language, 111-23;
McCabe, Maurice, 85 life described, 31-41; motion as
McNeill, David, 4 central to, 199-207, 217; myth-
Malinowski, Bronislaw, 12, 262 ology, 142-43, 147-50, 205-7, 225-
Marriage Counselling Service, 257 26; religion, 37-39; social
Matthews, Washington, 213 organization, 35-37; students’
Mead, Margaret, 13, 47 backgrounds, 63-73; taught to
Meade, Ellen, 7, 229 use film, 74-127; tribal govern-
Medium Cool, 245 ment, 34-35; value systems, 2 8 -
Messaris, 246-47 29,57-58,131; why chosen for this
Metraux, Rhoda, 47 study, 27-28
Mills, George, 13 The Navajo Horse, 264-65
The Monkey Bars, 266 The Navajo Silversmith, 204-5, 268
Morgan, William, 84 A Navajo Weaver, 204-5, 267-68
motion in Navajo films, 199-207, Negro. See black
2171 255 Nelson, Johnny, 8, 41, 51-56, 71-72,
motion pictures. See films 78-79?82,867 93,9698, 101-37 107-
Mt. Sinai Medical School, 7, 257 10, ‘30, ‘36, 144-46, ‘51-55, 183-88,
movies. See films 193-96, 201-9, 213, 217, 222-27, 250,
mythical analysis, 142-43 262, 264-65, 268-70
myths, Navajo: in films, 225-26; on new cinema, 247-48
long journey and origin, 205-7; “Night Chant,” 147, 149
walking in, 147-48, 150 The Noble Teens, 234
nonverbal communication, 13; see
Nanook of the North, 261 also visual communication
narrative style of Navajo films: Not Much to Do, 48,101,240, 242, 2 5 0
face close-ups, 152-62; mythical
analysis, 142-43; walking, 144-52 Old Antelope Lake. See Antelope
National Institute of Mental Lake
Health, 256 origin myths, 205-7
-
natural environment in Navajo Osgood, Charles E., 14
films, 107-8 Oxford Filmmaking Cooperative,
Navajo: actors, 139, 181-89; avoid- 2357 2 5 0
ance of face close-ups, 152-65;
balance as important to, 57-58; Panofsky, Erwin, 19
culture, 31-41; curing ceremo- Pavatea, Dorothy, 71
nies, 37-38; dexterity in equip- Pavatea, Tom, 71
ment handling, 190-98; Pavatea, Tom Jr., 71
Index
perception: differences in, 95; pro- settings, cross-group comparisons
cesses of Navajo, 193-98 Of, 238-41
peyote cult, 39 The Shallow Well, 130, 250, 269-70
Philadelphia Child Guidance Shipley School Project, 235
Clinic, 234, 257 Skinner, B.F., 44
Philadelphia group filmmaking, socio-cultural context of filmmak-
228-51 ing, 228-51
Pine Springs, Arizona, 3,40-41,49, sociodocumentary films, 231-37
255 Sorenson, E.R., 14
The Piiion Tree, 264 speech. See language
Porter, Edwin, 90-91 Spencer, Katherine, 226
practice films, 93-108 Spicer, Edward H., 30
premiere of films, 128-31 Spindler, George D., 13
primitive peoples' use of film, The Spirit of the Navajo, 130, 269
260-61 splicing, film, 88-89
processing equipment, 261 status in filmmaking activity,
property rights, Navajo, 182-89 244-48
Stoddard, Robert, 235
reality, how structured thru film? story line in group films, 248-51
11-20, 253-54 structure of films: developmental,
research: content analysis of visual 89-93; of group-made, 244-48;
materials, 46-47; interdiscipii- and reality, 253-54; and symbol-
nary, 132-33; method used in this ism, 166-80
study, 42-62; similar to this pro- students used in this study: back-
ject's, 256-57; socio-documen- grounds of, 63-73; how chosen,
tary, 233-37; suggestions for 49-59, '39
further, 252-62; on visual code, subject matter: of group films, 241-
43-47; on visual communica- 44, 248-51; of Navajo films, 139,
tions, 6-8, 13-14 181-89; restriction on range of,
The Robbery, 234 256
Robbin, Dan, 249 The Summer Shower, 264
Rouch, Jean, 46 suspense in Navajo films, 205
Rough Rock Demonstration The Swing, 266
School, 39-40 symbolic structure of films, 166-80,
19697
Sapir, Edward, 28, 177, 180, 207 syntax of film, 167-68
Scholte, Bob, 6
semantics of film, 167 Tabernacle Film Project, 235, 250
semiotics of film, 27 teaching another culture to use
sequencing film events, 166-80 film, 254-55, 259
286 ) Index
teaching Navajos to use film, 74- vidistics, 27
127
visual communication: and codes
teenagers’ films, 47-48, 1 0 1 , 169-71, in context theory, 137-41; coding
189, 228-51 of, 17-20; and cognitive pro-
themes: of group films, 241-44,248- cesses, 28; cross-cultural, 12-13;
51; of Navajo films, 139,181-89;re- and ethnography of film, 231-33;
stricted range of, 256 image selection in, 258; research
“Tracking Bear,” 148 on, 6, 13-14, 43-47
Tsosie, Juan, 41, 56-60, 63, 65, 72 Vogt, Evon Z., 30, 74
Tsosie, Mary Jane, 56,58,63-68,80-
82, 86, 103-4, 172, 265, 269: see also walking, in Navajo films, 144-52,
Tsosie sisters 204, 205
Tsosie, Maxine, 56,58,63-68,80-82, What We Do. . . on Saturday. . ., 234,
93-94, 98-100, 103-43 1711 ‘99, 226, 250
265-66, 269; see also Tsosie sisters white vs. black teenage film-
Tsosie sisters, 128, 130, 144-45, 156- makers, 239-51
65, 172, 183, 250 Whorf, B.L., 28, 199
12th and Oxford Filmmaking Whorf Sapir hypothesis, 28, 177,
Cooperative, 235, 250 180, 207, 258
Wilder, Mitchell, 150
universal appeal of film, 257-58 Wolfenstein, Martha, 47
“universals” in film communica- workshops, film, 228-51
tion, 134-35 “world premiere,” 128-31
University Settlement Film Club, Worth, Mrs. Sol, 124-25
230
Yazzie, Florence, 71
value systems: Navajo, 57-58,131; as Yazzie, Sam, 3-5, 50, 58, 65, 69,
revealed in film, 28-29 103-5, 129, 156-651 172, 183
verbal vs. visual communication,
258 Zillmann, 18

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi