41 vues

Transféré par shaowei1111

- White Stack Towing Corporation, Claimant-Respondent v. Bethlehem Steel Company, the Bethcoal No. 1, Her Gear, Appurtenances, Etc., and A/b Kronvik Shipping Co. O/y, as Owners of the M/s Bornholm, 279 F.2d 419, 4th Cir. (1960)
- Applied High-speed Plate Penetration Dynamics
- Vasquez-Beggs Oil Measurement Method
- Roger Ghanem, David Higdon, Houman Owhadi (Eds.)-Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification-Springer International Publishing (2017)
- Celluler Automata
- 32
- Port of Mackay Port Handbook 11.01.16
- Tales of the Buddha's Former Lives Stories 51-100
- 863104.pdf
- Design for Production
- WearFEA2005.PDF
- Chemical Plant Flare Minimization via Plantwide Dynamic Simulation
- 78143930 UK P I GARD Pilotage March 2011
- 06 - 07-14-2013 Simulation
- Oil Tankers
- ieee_ia_38_5_1297
- 07_The Modelling of Manpower by Markov Chains
- Mss 251 Scenario Background (4)
- Annex v Discharge Requirements 01-2013
- Marine Invaders

Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 17

Routeing Procedures

R. Motte and S. Calvert

(Institute of Marine Studies, Plymouth Polytechnic)

Weather-related ship loss statistics are assessed as a proportion of total losses to ascertain the

requirement for route planning. A routeing assessment for suitability of on-board application

is undertaken and a moveable grid is then proposed incorporating a time optimization pro-

cedure for the on-board system.

waves on her hull, structure or cargo. Paradoxically, the recent rapid transfer of

freight to the through transport mode of containerization has highlighted this.

The flimsy container (flimsy that is in comparison with the hull) often bears the

brunt of a breaking sea with disastrous consequences. The relatively poorer sea-

keeping characteristics and higher potential speeds of these vessels, allied to the

requirement to maintain a schedule as part of a multi-modal system, may cause

ship owners to take a harder look at the advantages a weather routeing system

has to offer. Much of the recent effort to reduce ship damage and loss by

applications of technology has not been directed to loss due to environmental

causes. Radar and navigational instrumentation are directed towards reducing

collisions and modern inertial gas systems reduce the risk of explosion and fire

in tankers. Little has been done in the application of new understandings and/or

new technologies towards minimizing the effects of stress and weather leading

to damage, foundering or abandonment.

Table i indicates that some 30 per cent of all ship losses are as a direct result

of press of weather and this relates to approximately half a million tonnes of

shipping each year. Consideration should be given in attempting to reduce this

alarming statistic. Not surprisingly the main areas of ship loss are in the middle

latitudes of the North Atlantic and North Pacific oceans. By far the greatest

number of losses due to non-sustainable extremes of weather occur in these areas.

Of course, these are the densest trade routes but that is not the complete answer.

They are, coincidentally, the home of middle latitude, extra tropical depres-

sions, which sweep across the baroclinic zone. They dominate the weather in

these regions covering great areas of ocean with uninterrupted wind fields of long

duration which, in their turn, build up wide and fully developed sea states. On

some routes as much as 30 per cent extra fuel is consumed, and an equivalent

ratio of time added to voyage lengths, because of their effects They also cause

damage to vessel and cargo. One North Atlantic operator has calculated an annual

4 t 7 is-2

41 8 R. M O T T E AND S. CALVERT VOL. 41

Loss

Stress of weather

founderings

Totals and abandonment

1978 170 •4 — — —

1979 279 2-3 96 o-61 034

1980 227 i-8 88 042 039

1981 249 17 74 0-49 C30

1982 236 1-46 62 0-40 027

1983 209 'IS 72 029 0-2 2

1984 2ij 130 86 — 040

198J 189 129 64 0'26 0'20

1986 i*6 1-2 I 72 o-£7 047

The ratio of weather-related losses (i.e. stress of weather, foundering or abandonment) to all

losses varies from 02 to 047 but is generally above one third. It has been and continues to be

a growing category, relatively, as a reason for ship loss. (Source: The Underwriters'

Association.)

depressions travel in an approximately easterly direction at various speeds, which

over the open ocean may be meaned to some 30—40 kt. Vessels are most at risk on

westbound passages when they are closing these systems at a relative go or 60

kt (for a 20 kt vessel). The consideration must be to minimize this system effect

by judicious planning, a well defined criterion for routeing.

A discussion of some of the features of the baroclinic instability and the

baroclinic wave which give rise to middle latitude depressions has been presented

previously.3

2. ROUTEING APPLICATIONS AND SUITABILITY. Depression frequency

is of the order of one depression per week in the North Atlantic and the life cycle

of a depression is also of this order. 4 Coincidentally a modern vessel capable of

some 20 kt is on a North Atlantic passage for one week. Thus on average the

operators of the vessel will need to consider the position of the vessel relative

to one and possibly two depressions per ocean transit.

On eastbound passages, a vessel will be travelling with the general movement

of the depressions, the relative rate of approach of the vessel to the potential

storm is decreased. Conversely, on a westbound passage the velocity of the

baroclinic wave is added to the wind velocity and the velocity of the vessel to

give a higher rate of approach and, of course, a greater likelihood of adverse seas

affecting vessel performance. Indeed, claims of shore routeing agencies in saving

times on recommended routes for eastbound passages are usually of the order of

one hour only for the total passage, whilst 10 hours is the order of time claimed

for westbound passages after several crossings have been averaged.

NO. 3 WEATHER ROUTEING PROCEDURES 419

Effective avoidance must lead to safer and smoother voyages and on occasions,

as a bonus, to minimizing passage time. Better predictability of arrival time, for

vessels with massive unit loads, indicates a further requirement. The general

trend in the 1980s is for short holding time in port with faster, more specialist

carrier units. Expensive terminal facilities are provided with a timetabled usage

by a consortium. The programming of such an operation has to be done with a

minimum tolerance of voyage time fluctuation; thus each vessel's schedule is

important to the whole scheme. There is little requirement to reduce passage

time; the demand is not to increase time on passage by, for instance, heaving to

in a storm for a day. This tendency towards specialization and through transport

systems suggests a demand for strategic routeing. The long-term savings accruing

by reducing heavy-weather damage both to ship and cargo on strategic routes are

the main reason, however, for adopting routeing procedures. The penalties of

' off-hire' clauses relating to overdue vessels on time charters, the carriage of

sensitive cargoes and susceptibility of damage to vessels in ballast, are additional

arguments for a storm avoidance approach.

Thus on-board routeing should be conducted with the fundamental philosophy

of storm or gale avoidance. A rigorous analysis of an individual vessel's

behavioural characteristics and, therefore, performance related to relative wind

force and direction should be undertaken to learn and catalogue the limitations

of environmental conditions to which that vessel should be exposed. It then

follows that a good estimate should be made of:

(i) the short-term prevailing conditions that the vessel may immediately

experience on departure;

(ii) the medium-term or mid-ocean development of depressions;

(iii) the long-term or far ocean features likely to occur before the vessel

completes her passage.

It is of limited value to attempt to route vessels on the evidence of surface

information alone. It is always necessary to have an indication of storm movement

and future development, particularly for the second half of the passage. Such

indication is only attainable with the assistance of upper air information to

evaluate the growth and steering likelihood of depressions.

Optimization routines are generally based on a matching of ship performance

data with sea surface data, relating the seakeeping characteristics to an analysis and

the predicted sea wave fields. Unfortunately for the routeing analyst these

predicted fields are only available for up to two or a maximum of three days

ahead. Retrospective analysis using optimization techniques is, on the other hand,

a highly accurate tool. As accurate or prevailing sea data are not normally

available and the ' optimization' is undertaken using raw and often inaccurate

forecasted sea fields, after day one the term ' optimization' in such an application

may be perceived as a misnomer. It can lead to misinformation in that short-term

indicators of measured or calculated sea states will not accurately relate to the

position and/or intensity of middle latitude transient storms during the later

periods of a passage. Initial decisions on advised courses should relate to the

passage as a whole. Such subjective decision making, on board, can have

considerable advantages when backed up with an optimization programme, and a

420 R. MOTTE AND S. CALVERT VOL. 41

trans-ocean grid can be biased to the locality of the proposed route. For example,

should the 500 mb flow indicate major storm activity to the south of a

conventional route so that the prognosis advises a northerly passage, a grid can

be positioned so as to avoid unnecessary southerly coverage. This reduces the

need for high capacity machines for on-board operation and reduces the storage

of unwanted environmental data.

In devising a working algorithm for an ocean wide grid which, of necessity,

will use a set of sea states (Petri et al.5) for several time and space stages, it

is necessary to be economical with data. For example, a basic ship-based

program with, say, 10 space states and 10 time slots at each stage will give 100

variations at each stage and so there will be 10000 ways to travel. All routes must

be examined in the dynamic programming; it follows that any pre-planning

which reduces input data by causing a ship to proceed within a reduced grid size

and strategic decision making which reduces comparisons in the optimization

procedures, will assist the operation.

3. MODEL F O R M U L A T I O N . In designing an on-board system for optimal

weather routeing several aspects were dependant upon the capabilities of the

computer and its memory size. There is a need for a simple recursive algorithm

and model using accurate predicted sea state data and ship data. Dynamical

programming (DP) was therefore accepted as the basis for the initial trials for an

on board system, since:

(i) The model is a simple powerful tool for calculating the optimum route

across an ocean.

(ii) The computer capabilities could be easily matched to the size of grid

mesh required and the speed of computation. The Acorn Cambridge

Workstation which was used is quoted to be as fast as a lightly loaded

mainframe system but is a stand alone machine.

(iii) The methodology can incorporate more than one objective function and

more importantly, for micro-based systems, the calculation constraints

can be levelled both linearly and directly.

(iv) Grid points can be labelled by latitude, longitude, objective policy

decisions and environmental parameters.

The DP grid can be represented by a series of legs or zones, across an ocean,

where each zone consists of several latitude points. It was found convenient for

the grid to be geared to the shortest distance across the ocean, that is the great

circle route. Motte et al.,6 studied the grid mesh size for a rectangular grid

system, and found that a four degree of longitude by a half degree of latitude mesh

was adequate. In effect this grid stretches out the east—west dimension and

therefore, provides for a closer great circle fit.

Taking the great circle as the central line between departure and destination,

the DP grid can be constructed by taking perpendiculars at, for instance, ^8

intermediate points. Such a grid consists of 60 stages in the east—west direction

and can be constructed in the north—south direction to a number of points

depending upon the distance taken along the perpendicular from the great circle.

Mesh size is thus easily controllable and the discontinuous routes on a large grid

can be smoothed by reducing the north—south point spread.

NO. 3 WEATHER ROUTEING PROCEDURES 42 I

throughout the whole grid, the grid can be constrained or weighted (increased)

depending upon the likelihood of storm movement. As has already been pointed

out, by observing the £00 mb flow and predicted depressions, the grid can be

weighted to avoid such an area and therefore omit unnecessary calculations. Chen

et al.,1 Zoppoli8 and Motte et al.6 describe the constraints placed on the DP

method, as applied to optimum ship routeing, under the headings of environment

and control, which cover the following.

Environmentally induced constraints. These may be seen to include natural

obstacles such as ocean basin geography, fog areas, ice areas and even extremes

of winds and/or seas for accurate predicted or hindcast data. In the event of ' no-

go ' areas at sea, small blocks can be omitted in much the same manner, but on

a localized scale. These can be preset before calculation, however, sea state data,

as previously noted, are only accurate for up to three days ahead and omission of

grid points in the real time because of high sea states will have to be performed

by other methods, for example using the £00 mb flow. The true optimum route

is never actually followed but, in terms of data storage capacity for the journey,

smaller data files need only be held rather than the full environmental array

(approximately 20000 bytes). At the present stage of the investigation the data

used are accurate observation and predicted hindcast data for early validation by

comparison with Oceanroutes (UK) Ltd advised passages. The grid can therefore

easily be weighted without the need for 500 mb flow details.

Ship control constraints. These are concerned with aspects of power output,

steering rates, maximum course deviation and maximum ship motions or

responses. These constraints tend to be more complex than those previously

discussed and are due to the reactions of the vessel in the seaway. Vessel

performance is difficult to quantify and for use in the micro-computer where the

response needs calculation many thousands of times, a simple speed-weather

function is required. Speed reduction curves were therefore used, based upon sea

height, sea direction, wind speed and so on. Three such approaches were

investigated, namely those of James,9 Townsin10 and Babbedge,11 and the last

was found to be most applicable. In program execution, the vessel transits the

ocean along the great circle route (GCR) from departure point at a set time to

the destination point and this results in an estimated transit time along that route.

Bellmans principles' 2 then state that the DP grid should be transitted backwards

since decisions taken in the future have no bearing upon decisions made in the

past. The optimum route transit time is then that of the GCR or less. However,

the initial aim of the program for validation purposes is to match as closely as

possible the departure point time which can result in further time iterations.

Obviously this increases calculation time but results in a more realistic

route.

If large wave heights are encountered on any route, a low speed may be derived

from the ship response algorithms. A speed flag is set to mark such an occasion

and recalculation is commenced. In effect the vessel 'heaves t o ' for some time

until an acceptable speed is accomplished. The speed reduction curves are thus

regarded as being operative for wave heights up to a set value (that is for power

422 R. MOTTE AND S. CALVERT VOL. 41

limited states). Beyond that value, voluntary speed loss is not included in the

algorithms although the vessel is required to 'heave-to'. If the weather is

persistent and time is removed for heave-to then the time available for the

remainder of the voyage may become zero. If such a situation occurs, typically

during the winter months, then an omission flag can be triggered withdrawing

calculations from that point. This restriction has to be waived near the start point

of a voyage as it may prevent the route reaching its goal during further

iterations.

In transiting a zone from an ' end' point, several ' next' points are looked to.

(See Fig. i.)

Course deviation is restricted in the program to a number of points either side

of the central or 'end' point, depending upon the grid mesh size. Power

limitations are governed by the set service speed and correspond with the speed

reduction limitations. The full program flow is shown in the Appendix.

4. DYNAMICAL PROGRAMMING WITHIN THE COMPUTER MODEL.

Dynamical programming was favoured over other possible models for its

simplicity and power. The methodology was first proposed in 1957 and the form

of the deterministic ship optimization equations are as follows:

terminal cost function J(Xn) = A(* destlnatlon ) (1)

The state X, defines the vector of latitude and longitude, the optimization

parameter and the environmental conditions at that point for the purposes of this

model. The process is then to find the minimum to that point by reference to the

foregoing (backward recursion). The function between the points is one of

environmental conditions on that route and the response of the vessel to those

conditions.

In the model, the defined states at the DP grid points are determined by

maximizing the speed of the vessel, that is maintaining a constant vessel power,

and obtaining time functions from the vessel speed and weather parameters. The

states at the point are defined by geographical coordinates and time, however in

a more realistic situation it might be prudent to slow the vessel down in the

earlier stages of a shorter distance route rather than maximizing vessel speed.

Thus there is a necessity in this respect for forward looking storm observations

and an expanded time state. The state is found by speed variation and the

optimization objective function becomes more complicated. The amount of

calculation is raised by a large factor and it is felt best at this stage to limit the

micro-computer advisory system, to the simple time state.

NO. 3 WEATHER ROUTEING PROCEDURES 423

Latitude steps

Fig.

The environmental inputs. The data used for the time optimization programs

were initially entered by manual /computer overlay block means to produce an

array data file for each day of weather. For ease therefore, a one degree grid

system was adopted and DP grid point weather data found by close matching of

the two grids. The data were taken from wave charts and consist of significant

wave heights and directions. The data are produced for each one degree grid

point in the ocean and since the optimal grid can be of the order of 2000 points,

each holding several parameters, the process becomes tedious. For analysis

purposes output from the UK Meteorological Office's wave model is used and

is more accurate and efficient. The number of data points is not increased but

rather the number of data parameters (see Fig. 2). There is a need to investigate

the computer calculation time for such a large data box, either to reduce the data

volume or expand the grid spacing. The data arrays can be represented by a three-

dimensional grid, as shown. Each layer of the grid box represents one data

parameter, where that parameter is defined by latitude and longitude. At the

present stage the data box is only two layers deep, representing wave heights and

directions. However, a simple empirical formula for wind speed and an assumed

wind direction are used to provide the inputs to ship response formulae. Wave

and wind data from the Meteorological Office model provides many more

accurate inputs, taking the grid to nine layers deep (see Fig. 2).

As stated by Chen et ah, the data field can be represented by a data plane,

where: <P = latitude; A = longitude; subscript 1,2,3 = points one, two and

three; and z = data parameter in use.

R. MOTTE AND S. CALVERT VOL. 41

i = . . . 11

r

i = 6

i = 5

i = 4-

/ = 3

i = 2

60

Grid points

i = 1

30

80 W 0 W

-«— Longitude

Fig. 2. Grid data box. i, significant wave height; 2, swell wave direction; 3,

significant wave period; 4, swell wave period; j , wind speed; 6, wind direction; 7,

swell wave height; 8, wind wave height; 9, wind wave period; 10, current speed; 11,

current direction

is:

(A-A,)

A2-At

A, —A,

A 2 -A,

(5)

The formulation of intermediary data values requires three points and these are

taken to be the two points involved in the transit plus one other next to the

destination point. Three intermediary points are used between transit points and

their latitudes and longitudes 0, A are found by thirding the distance between

transit points and inversing Mercator's formula. This then occurs for each data

parameter to give a closer representative value than a simple mean for the transit.

NO. 3 WEATHER ROUTEING PROCEDURES

The data plane formula (equation ($)) is used 31' times, where i is the number of

data parameters listed in Fig. 2. The inclusion of the added data will go hand in

hand with improved ship response algorithms. The ship response formula then

provides an optimal parameter for the intermediate zone transits.

The ship response. The response of the vessel in a seaway is of prime importance

to the weather optimal routeing programs. The development of the programs has

involved the speed loss curves proposed by James,9 however, the further

improvement of these formulae by Babbedge'' has also been included and it is

hoped that the next stage of development will be a simplified ship model to

describe all motions applied to the sea spectra by superposition techniques. There

will then be a balancing of power and resistance from which fuel and/or cost

objective functions can be found.

The James speed-loss curves describe the speed loss of a vessel under the

influence of wave height and direction. Typically there are three curves,

representing three sea regimes — head, beam and following — however, no tests

were made with this model as further advances were made to use the

Babbedge1' formula, which is described later. The advantages and disadvantages

of the James speed loss curves are :

(i) They can easily be described by third degree polynomials from

experimentally derived data. The information from curves supplied in the

Bales13 paper was tried out using the curve fitting routines.

(ii) The equations are simple and therefore are ideal for repetitive use in the

routeing programs since many calculations are made through the grid. It is

questionable if the size of the DP grid can still be used when the response section

is expanded to incorporate a ship model.

(iii) The curves can only be found by extensive experiments at sea, thus they

are individual and require much time and effort.

(iv) The curves only describe a wave encounter angle of 1 20 degrees for each

sea regime. Thus differing combinations of wave heights and directions will effect

the same speed reduction whereas in reality this is not so.

(v) The curves only utilize a small amount of data and, in fact, only use wave

direction as a pointer to which equation to use.

The form of the equations is as follows:

speed = ai + biHx + q Hi + </j W| (6)

Where Hi_ = significant wave height; i = (1) head sea, (2) beam sea, and (3)

following sea; a, b, c, d are coefficients of the polynomial.

The equations have been modified by Babbedge'' but still are individual to the

ship. Observations carried out aboard four ships were analysed statistically in

order to establish the main causes for ship speed loss and to incorporate them in

a speed reduction equation. The equation thus does away with the sea regime and

actively uses the wave direction as a parameter in the equations. The equations

also incorporate power, maximum speed in calm conditions, wind speed, wind

direction, wave height, wave direction, sea temperature and ship displacement,

but still fall short of fully describing the ship response since the seaway is only

described by significant wave height and primary direction. It is well known that

426 R. MOTTE AND S. CALVERT VOL. 41

sea spectra for many differing seas can have the same significant wave heights and

directions, thus the response of the vessel will be predicted to be the same in

cases where it can be grossly dissimilar. The Babbedge formulae still have the

same advantages of the previous approach, however, they improve the routeing

algorithms at this stage.

The form of the Babbedge equations are:

-10-2

r i

+ 0-04 (0— 12) — 0000 1 2 (A — 37ooo) + o-27 (7)

Where :

P = power; V = calm speed setting; VR = wind speed; Hw = significant wave

height; /i = wave direction; /? = wind direction; 0 = sea temperature; and

A = ship displacement.

Scott's empirical wind/wave formula used:

Ww = °°7S VI (8)

where Hw = significant wave height; and Kw = wind speed.

The formula can be used for a specific speed in calm conditions with due

respect to the maximum power available for the ship. Under the present program

for time optimization, power is constant and speed is maximized with respect to

the particular meteorological conditions.

Equation (7) formed the initial basis for trials as mentioned but it was felt that

the amount of calculation required might be unduly increased by variations for

sea temperature and/or ship displacement. A series of trials were then simulated

using varying significant wave heights, displacements and temperatures to

establish the effect these parameters have on the speed calculated. The wind

speed was formulated on the Scott formula, equation (8), as used by Babbedge.

However, this formula is not strictly accurate and the formula adopted by the UK

Meteorological Office incorporated a simple constant for wave height in the

presence of no wind. The standard curve for comparison was that without this

parameter (see Figs 3—6). The Babbedge equations can be rearranged to optimize

for power given a speed to be maintained across the ocean. This demonstrates the

versatility of such equations and their importance in micro based systems.

Equation (7) can be represented by:

giving,

^ = 6-44 l n P — (10)

K }

'" w a v e - K c a l m wind] ++ P

NO. 3 WEATHER ROUTEING PROCEDURES 427

•x—«

2000 1500

17-14- 12-86

_ 14-29 j 70-77

o

x 11-43 £ fl-57

2 8-57 g. *•«

5 71 4-29

206 2-74

0 0

«<J 72-65 76 87 2708 4-22 <J<J 72-65 76S7 27-06

Sig wave ht (M) Sig wave ht (M)

Fi F

g- 3 'g- 4

Fig. 3. Wave height versus speed for constant power with variations. Dart Atlantic:

maximum speed, 20 kt; d.w.t., 41 000: A, following sea; • , beam sea; + , head sea.

Wave factor: x , following sea; D, beam sea; • , head sea

Fig. 4. Wave height versus speed for constant power with variations. Dan Atlantic:

maximum speed, i j k t ; d.w.t., 41000. Temperature factor: x , following sea; n,

beam sea; • , head sea. For key to other symbols see Fig. 3

15 00 1500

12-86 12-86

10-71 70-77

613 6-43

4 29 4-29

2 14- 2 14

0 0

0 4-22 8-43 12-65 16-87 2108 4-22 8-4-3 12-65 16-87 21-08

Sig wave htlM) Sig wave ht (M)

F

'g- S Fig. 6

Fig. j . Wave height versus speed for constant power with variations. Dart Atlantic:

maximum speed, i j k t ; d.w.t., 41000. Displacement factor: x , following sea; n,

beam sea; • , head sea. For key to other symbols see Fig. 3

Fig. 6. Wave height versus speed for constant power with variations. Dart Atlantic:

maximum speed, 1 c kt; d.w.t., 41 000. Wind factor: x , following sea; n , beam sea;

• , head sea. For key to other symbols see Fig. 3

428 R. MOTTE AND S. CALVERT VOL. 41

19-66 r

1667

H-06

O

6-43

5-52

A T

0

I J

1660-8 3721-6 55624. 74-43-2

Max power

9304-0

Power (HP)

Fig. 7. Wave height versus power for constant speeds. Dart Atlantic: d.w.t., 41 000.

A, j kt; T, 10 kt; +, i j k t , encounter angle, 00

19 68 r

1687

14-06

11-24

0)

1 8-43

5-62

2-81

Max power

j

" 0 18608 3721-6 5582-4 74-432 9304 0

Power (HP)

Fig. 8. Wave height versus power for constant speeds. Dart Atlantic: d . w . t . , 41 000.

A, j k t ; T, 10 kt, + , i j k t ; encounter angle 1800

NO. 3 WEATHER ROUTEING PROCEDURES 429

Certain graphs have been produced to show the variation of power setting against

wave heights, to maintain a required speed (see Figs 7 and 8).

c. R O U T E I N G C O M P A R I S O N . Several runs were made for the North

Atlantic based on the Dart Atlantic formulae as described by Babbedge.'' These

runs were then compared with the routes advised by Oceanroutes (UK) Ltd, for

the same period of weather which was chosen to be during the winter months

(Nov. 86—Dec. 86). Obviously the ships routed are not identical and so large

discrepancies can occur. However, with this in mind the Dart Atlantic was set at

different service speeds and different loading conditions in order to give a

different actual vessel speed during transit. The deadweight tonnage (d.w.t.)

only provides one input to the speed estimate so different combinations of d.w.t.

and set service speed may provide the same speed estimate.

The information provided by Oceanroutes was the actual advised route sailed

(only open ocean), the type of vessel involved, the d.w.t. of the vessel and the

departure and destination times. It was hoped that the vessel matching could be

much closer, but the only possible matching was that of d.w.t. and not

service speed. The initial routes were run on a DP grid derived by taking points

at increments of 60 nautical miles from the great circle route. The routes advised

show some degree of discontinuity but changing the grid mesh size or

incorporating a smoothing algorithm through the rough route removes the

jaggedness.

A routeing case is shown in Fig. 9, west-bound from Cork (S. Ireland), to New

York (N. America). Several runs were performed with differing loading

characteristics and set service speed. The program runs therefore illustrate

theoretical vessels for the period in question. Fig. 9(6) illustrates a run for

42000 d.w.t. and a set service speed of i$kt, Fig. 9(c), however, illustrates

the same run for a 48 000 d.w.t. vessel at a service speed of 18 kt. The latter run

is intended to represent the Oceanroutes advised course as given to a 48 000

d.w.t. bulker. The routes are performed on the larger DP grid system and

therefore show a degree of discontinuity. However, Figs 10(a) and (b) show

the same runs on a finer grid, at 14 and 15 kt and it may be noted that smoothing

of the optimum route removes extreme values of course change.

6. C O N C L U S I O N . The intention of this work at Plymouth Polytechnic is to

produce an on-board advisory weather routeing package. In designing such a

system it is necessary to take into account the capabilities of the machine and so

this paper has tried to outline both the limitations and methods for utilizing that

capability.

It is suggested that advantages can be gained by using a simple optimal

algorithm and ship response algorithm for the calculation of optimum time

routes. However, there is a trade-off in this approach when further optimal

parameters are required. The moveable grid system is shown to reduce both

calculation time and required memory space and is considered an ideal method

for including constraints in the optimal calculations. There is a need for

observing the 500 mb flow details and biasing the grid depending upon the results

since accurate forecasts do not exist for a complete North Atlantic transit.

Optimal routeing for the whole voyage would require complete and accurate data

I I I I

30

80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0

(a)

60

55

80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0

(b)

SO 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0

(c)

Fig. 9. North Atlantic crossing, (a) d.w.t., 39000; speed, I J kt: (b) d.w.t., 42000;

speed, I J kt: (c) d.w.t., 48400; speed, 18 kt. A, advised route; O, optimum route;

G, great circle

NO. 3 WEATHER ROUTEING PROCEDURES 431

Optimal 1

N-S

Great Circle 2

Advised route 3

55

Review

DART ATLANTIC 46 000 d.w.t.

50 QCR dist: 2363-4 OCR dist: 2704-8

OCR time: 319-76

iS OCR time: 26231

T saving: 37-47

40 Departure time

20-2

Departure Arrival

35

4900 700 40-40 62-40

30

SO 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 W-E

Current ship status

4900 700 212-0 16-306-11

Bunkers

Remaining Total used Estimated total

(a)

Optimal 1

N-S

Great Circle 2

Advised route 3

55

Review

DART ATLANTIC 46 000 dw.t.

50 OCR dist: 2363 4 OCR dist: 2751-9

GCR time: 294-81

OCR time: 256 34

T saving: 36-47

Departure time

40

20-2

Departure Arrival

35

1900 700 40-40 62-40

30

60 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 W-E

Current ship status

4900 700 209-9 16-337-10

Bunkers

Remaining Total used Estimated total

(b)

Fig. 10. (a) Smoothed d.w.t., 48000; speed, 14IU: (fc) smoothed d.w.t., 48000,

speed 1j kt

432 R. MOTTE AND S. CALVERT VOL. 41

for the transit, however this is not available and it is believed that observing a

steering level and and long range forecasts will provide better results than relying

upon climatological 'fill-in' data.

The authors believe that it is essential to concentrate on the physics of the

operation rather than to have the mathematics 'take control'. For example, the

problem of relating vessel response to the sea state demands in the optimization

routine a good estimate of sea conditions for the complete passage. How is this

to be best achieved? Assumptions have to be made that the prediction for the

forecasted period remains good when the next set of data takes over. Is this a

realistic proposition, or can the two sets of data be examined and a linear time-

varying sea state obtained for the period in question?

REFERENCES

1

Heijboer, D. (1974). Weather routeing — a modern aid to navigation. Fairplay International.

8 March.

2

Motte, R. and Laurence, C. A. (1985). Fuel consumption on container ships on the North

Atlantic. This Journal, 38, 2j8.

3

Motte, R. (1983). Ship based weather routeing using dynamical meteorology. This Journal,

36, 480.

4

Motte, R. (1973). Weather Routeing of Ships. London: Stanford Maritime.

5

Petrie, G. L., Bongort, K. J. and Maclean, W. M. (1982). A New Approach to Vessel Weather

Routeing and Performance Analysis. New York Metropolitan Section of SONAME.

6

Motte, R., Manhire, B. J. and Higham, J. (1985). Diagnostic and dynamical modelling for

weather routeing of ships using on-board micro-computers. Proc. Int. Conf. On Computer

Applications in the Operation and Management of Ships and Cargoes. Royal Institute of Naval

Architects.

7

Chen, H. T., Frankel, E. G., Fiore, A. E. and Carleton, H. (1976). Optimisation of ship

weather routeing. In Ship Operation and Automation Symposium, pp. 27—3 j (eds. Pitkin, Roche and

Williams).

8

Zoppoli, R. (1972). Minimum time ship routeing as an N-stage decision process. J. Appl.

Meteorol., 1 1 , 4 2 9 .

9

James, R. W . , (1957). Application of Wave Forecasts in Marine Navigation. US Naval

Oceanographic Office, Sp-i.

10

Townsin, R. L. and Kwon, Y. J. (1983). Approximate formulae for the speed loss due to

added resistance in wind and waves. J. Royal Institute of Naval Architects, 125, 199.

" Babbedge, N. H. (197J). Ship Speed Analysis. M. Phil. Thesis, Plymouth Polytechnic.

12

Bellman, R. (19J7). Dynamic Programming. New York: Princetown University Press.

Bales, S. L. (1976). The Use of Seakeeping in Ship Operations: A Status Report. D. W . Taylor

Naval Ship Research and Development Centre.

NO. 3 WEATHER ROUTEING PROCEDURES 433

V

Calculate data parameters

for intermediate points based

on data plane

and time

record optima) route path

T Within limits

END

- White Stack Towing Corporation, Claimant-Respondent v. Bethlehem Steel Company, the Bethcoal No. 1, Her Gear, Appurtenances, Etc., and A/b Kronvik Shipping Co. O/y, as Owners of the M/s Bornholm, 279 F.2d 419, 4th Cir. (1960)Transféré parScribd Government Docs
- Applied High-speed Plate Penetration DynamicsTransféré parAsad Imran
- Vasquez-Beggs Oil Measurement MethodTransféré parHassan Suheil
- Roger Ghanem, David Higdon, Houman Owhadi (Eds.)-Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification-Springer International Publishing (2017)Transféré parJaime Andres Cerda Garrido
- Celluler AutomataTransféré parAbed Nego Baputra
- 32Transféré parLia Armaya
- Port of Mackay Port Handbook 11.01.16Transféré parS Collins
- Tales of the Buddha's Former Lives Stories 51-100Transféré parjackiekyan
- 863104.pdfTransféré parMac Condorpusa Cordova
- Design for ProductionTransféré parJona Jona
- WearFEA2005.PDFTransféré parMuhammad Azeem
- Chemical Plant Flare Minimization via Plantwide Dynamic SimulationTransféré parb95504048
- 78143930 UK P I GARD Pilotage March 2011Transféré parboujnite
- 06 - 07-14-2013 SimulationTransféré parDavy Sorn
- Oil TankersTransféré parShan Ask
- ieee_ia_38_5_1297Transféré parRodrigo Andrade
- 07_The Modelling of Manpower by Markov ChainsTransféré parsharun19037715
- Mss 251 Scenario Background (4)Transféré parJulia Pires
- Annex v Discharge Requirements 01-2013Transféré parPia Phonangdam
- Marine InvadersTransféré parRoyal Forest and Bird Protecton Society
- A Brief History of TransportTransféré parAlvin Caga Forones
- DW18_10_11Transféré paraccount_me
- "Jea" Alien Invasion by Steven DonniniTransféré parSteven Donnini
- New Microsoft Office Word DocumentTransféré parNelson Varghese
- s.veeradhithyan,& v.sathyaprakash (Developing Concrete Using Sea Sand as an Aggregatesea Sand)Transféré parAshokRock
- Watch Keeping Contents of Bridge Procedures GuideTransféré parArnab Poddar
- Wind Cato Sv SpecsTransféré parChakma Nhiki
- landforms study guideTransféré parapi-265641808
- Failure is Our Most Important ProductTransféré parManisha Maharjan
- (1918) Shipyward Employment: A Place for Men to Help Win the WarTransféré parHerbert Hillary Booker 2nd

- 1717864878Siphon Drains EnTransféré parRani Fouad
- Imperialism; its prices; its vocationTransféré parOrsi
- Sustainable Green Urban Planning YosuaTransféré parYosua Vincencius Harefa
- ECDIS Legal Aspects NumericChart ENC RNC - CopiaTransféré parBalasi Simona
- unit_3nTransféré parMichael VanDenburgh
- bend.pdfTransféré parIdua Olunwa
- Seismic Zoning Map of ChinaTransféré parZarra Fakt
- SPE-100296-MS-PTransféré parRosa Fitris Sundewi
- MCU-Based Electronic Map (Inside)Transféré parIshimaru Thor
- Kintyre and Knapdale Parishes - Groome's 1896 GazeteerTransféré parKintyre On Record
- cerere locatariTransféré parRares Gabriel
- GEOGRAPHY COMPLET WORK BOOK.docTransféré parantoniozamora
- Maria Teresa CalderonTransféré parNikki Masbang
- The Abanico East Formation in the Chilean AndesTransféré parPaulina Madariaga
- Surveying & Built Environment Vol. 22 Issue 1 (Dec12)Transféré parahtin618
- The nomadic horse people of Central Asia part 1Transféré parMaria Stancan
- edtpa lesson plan teresa nguyen 2 1Transféré parapi-355848898
- Winter Hill PlazaTransféré parRayn Riel
- International Legend for Hydrogeology MapsTransféré parcysauts
- LectureTransféré parJoanBangit
- Standards Design ConstructionTransféré parFg Play
- OVERFISHINGTransféré parapi-3706215
- Epanet and Development. a Progressive 44 Exercise WorkbookTransféré parjcbobeda
- Estimate of Road MaintenanceTransféré parMalayKumarDeb
- Spectral Analysis of Aeromagnetic Anomalies from Parts of Mmaku and its Adjoining Areas in Southeastern, NigeriaTransféré parIJSRP ORG
- (UFI) Year 9 Astronomy AssignmentTransféré parAndina L Paramitha
- RSMinerve Technical ManualTransféré parHarold Llauca
- Zodiac MathTransféré parEarl Haywood
- Ramsar IndiaTransféré parAnkit Singh
- IRC SP-42Transféré parrahulajmer