Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Itroduction.
This final paper has one main objective: the analysis of the errors that we
committed when giving three different political speeches; besides, exposing the tools we
used to solve them out. Then we will explain how we improved our own oral production
with the help of each member of the group performing different roles in front of each other:
chose political speeches because politicians usually make a great emphasis in their words
by stressing them exaggeratedly in order to assure the understanding and that their speeches
will stay in people’s mind; moreover, the remarked and slow pace pursuing the same
effects. The analysis of a political speech was a quite useful instrument to get a closer
thought that this kind of speech would allow us to increase in quality our own individual
skills. Along this document, the reader will be able to find a group analysis of the members,
a self-analysis of each member taking into account the class and professor’s feedback, an
analysis taking into account some of the class’ reading documents, an analysis of each
member’s improvement along this semester and the final conclusions of the group’s work.
Javier H. Ortega: His intonation was quite flat. It seemed he was trying to imitate
Obama’s language patterns. There were some rises and falls missing in the speech
so its meaning was affected. Connected Speech was a weakness of him as well.
Speaking fast was not good when the goal of the presentation was intelligibility.
There were some words that were unintelligible, such as /ˈjet/ and there are some
The main cause of his problem with intonation was trying to mimic Obama’s
(Kenworthy, 1987), in this case it was a misleading way. Obama’s speech was very
fast and had no the characteristic features of a traditional political speech; so that
made Javier spoke so fast that some clusters containing junctures became difficult to
him to articulate.
Javier Carrillo: There were some articulatory mistakes such as producing the mid
low vowel instead of the high- back- unrounded vowel in the second name
/ˈælaɪz/, with the high front vowel at the end instead of the diphthong [ai]; and the
addition of a vowel sound before the [s] sound of the word [ˈespɪrɪtʃwəl] instead of
/ˈspɪrɪtʃwəl/. The word [ˈkəntroʊl] was stressed in the second syllable, instead of
/kənˈtroʊl/; which could have changed the syntactic relationship of the cluster
"It may be difficult for the listener to identify the word when it is not properly
intelligibility of the speech as a whole, the word was not an important or a key fact,
Hugo A. Ortiz: Although Hugo did a good use of intonation, he had some problems
when pronouncing clusters that ended with a consonant and begun with another
consonant. There were some problems such as holding a consonant too much, for
Gibson’s text about “Reading Aloud”, “The requirement to focus on every word also
slows reading speed and impedes the chunking of meaningful units (Eskey and
Grabe 1988) (Gibson, 2008, 30). So it could be the reason for those errors, specially
feedback.
according to the audience feedback, my biggest error was reading fast and trying to
different even for an American native speaker and it would be more accurate to adapt
features.
performance was accurate regarding intelligibility, which was the aim. Although
articulation of the speech as a whole was clear. I feel confident and comfortable
- Hugo A. Ortiz: When presenting the speech to the audience I felt quite confident
because we had practiced the speech a lot of times the week before; however I
committed a few errors which were mentioned by the audience at the end of the
the first time I read aloud the speech. I used all tools we had learnt along the semester
documents.
With respect to the type of discourse, we find a great deal of unknown vocabulary,
specially in Kennedy and Luther King’s addresses, that made the first reading aloud in the
overcome intuitively those errors of intonation and pronunciation of unknown words. This
experience was complemented by watching the speeches’ videos. In this way we realized
some details regarding to pace, pauses, intonation of some remarked phrases, body
language and the basis of our presentation: speeches’ reading aloud by politicians.
Alphabet versus the goddess, 1999), we put into practice those features characteristic of a
politician discourse such as, security, loud voice and sight towards the audience which
allow the “viewer … evaluates the candidate’s sincerity, cleverness, honesty, cunning, and
significant aid to their memories. As we experienced, reading from a text aid to feel more
comfortable avoiding anxiety, and all the consequences of it, during an oral performance in
front of an audience. This thought can be easily ratified by Dr. Sally Gibson: “Having the
text to read or use as a prompt can relieve the burden of having to remember it or compose
what to say, thereby allowing more attention to be directed to oral or aural concerns.”
Comparing the reading aloud and free speech part of our presentation, we can say
that there was a deep difference between these two types of communication. While
politicians, and reading a script previously rehearsed. At the time of giving feedbacks of
our rehearsal, we showed our actual “nonverbal clues, concrete gestalts, spontaneity,
…emotion” (Shlain,1999, 44); and for some of us it was more difficult to avoid hesitations
- Javier Ortega: At the very beginning of the semester I did not know that
could improve the way I do when speaking in public. My partners have told me that
my intonation was quite flat when we started studying phonetics and phonology
course but they also told me I have improved a lot because right now I am aware of
the importance of stressing words correctly and using intonation in any conversation
or speech in English.
- Javier Carrillo: It`s important to recognize that my knowledge about English
Phonetics was quite poor before I started this course, and that now, I can say that I
have already got the theoretical basis to get a fluid, spontaneous and accurately
- Hugo Ortiz: A good point to remark is the fact that my improvement is the result of
practicing the theoretical knowledge acquired in class. Taking into account all of the
different reading materials and the professor’s rehearsals in class is the best way to
improve not only your speaking skills, but your whole second language skills; thus,
common errors such as transmitting Spanish patterns such as flat intonation and fast
speaking disappear with every single exercise and activity realized. Tools such as
recordings and presentations were an excellent help in order to realize my own errors
Conclusions.
1. We have learnt, from the second presentation, that suprasegmental features carry a
great deal of meaning in English Language; this is, intonation, stress, rhythm in
mainly based on syntactic and semantic features. Besides, we have learnt that
to point out the errors we sometimes commit without being aware of them.
Speaking in public and receiving feedback from the audience about our
performance is a helpful tool for us, because that is the way we can realize about
2. We think that it was definitely accurate to choose this kind of speech. As political
it was an useful tool that facilitated the analysis and comparisons with our own
3. It results evident for us, that the work made by the group throughout the semester
has been satisfactorily evolutionary; that the awareness of our role as ESL Learners
has increased and that the elementary tools has been given and what we have to do
4. And, how will we rehearse those skills? Besides practical activities (listening to
radio, watching news, movies, interacting with native speakers, etc) we have to keep
into account that the reach of any achievement that we set up will depend entirely
on the plan we trace and the organization, responsibility and effort we execute that
plan with.
Annex 1.
We cannot turn back. There are those who are asking the devotees of civil rights, "When
will you be satisfied?" We can never be satisfied as long as our bodies, heavy with the
fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the
cities. We cannot be satisfied as long as the Negro's basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto
to a larger one. We can never be satisfied as long as a Negro in Mississippi cannot vote and
a Negro in New York believes he has nothing for which to vote. No, no, we are not
satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters and righteousness
I am not unmindful that some of you have come here out of great trials and tribulations.
Some of you have come fresh from narrow cells. Some of you have come from areas where
your quest for freedom left you battered by the storms of persecution and staggered by the
winds of police brutality. You have been the veterans of creative suffering. Continue to
back to the slums and ghettos of our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation
can and will be changed. Let us not wallow in the valley of despair.
I say to you today, my friends, that in spite of the difficulties and frustrations of the
moment, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.
I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its
creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal."
I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the
sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at a table of brotherhood.
I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a desert state, sweltering with the
heat of injustice and oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.
I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be
judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.
Annex 2
Washington, D.C.
Vice President Johnson, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chief Justice, President Eisenhower, Vice President
well as a beginning--signifying renewal as well as change. For I have sworn before you and
Almighty God the same solemn oath our forbears prescribed nearly a century and three-quarters
ago.
The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all
forms of human poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for
which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe--the belief that the rights of man
come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God.
We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution. Let the word go forth
from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new
generation of Americans--born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter
peace, proud of our ancient heritage--and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of
those human rights to which this nation has always been committed, and to which we are
Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any
burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the
success of liberty.
To those old allies whose cultural and spiritual origins we share, we pledge the loyalty of
faithful friends. United there is little we cannot do in a host of cooperative ventures. Divided
there is little we can do--for we dare not meet a powerful challenge at odds and split asunder.
To those new states whom we welcome to the ranks of the free, we pledge our word that one
form of colonial control shall not have passed away merely to be replaced by a far more iron
tyranny. We shall not always expect to find them supporting our view. But we shall always hope
to find them strongly supporting their own freedom--and to remember that, in the past, those who
foolishly sought power by riding the back of the tiger ended up inside.
Source:
http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+Resources/Archives/Reference+Desk/Speeches/JFK/In
Annex 3
Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a hall that still stands across the street, a group
of men gathered and, with these simple words, launched America's improbable experiment
in democracy. Farmers and scholars; statesmen and patriots who had traveled across an
ocean to escape tyranny and persecution finally made real their declaration of independence
The document they produced was eventually signed but ultimately unfinished. It was
stained by this nation's original sin of slavery, a question that divided the colonies and
brought the convention to a stalemate until the founders chose to allow the slave trade to
continue for at least twenty more years, and to leave any final resolution to future
generations.
Of course, the answer to the slavery question was already embedded within our
Constitution - a Constitution that had at is very core the ideal of equal citizenship under the
law; a Constitution that promised its people liberty, and justice, and a union that could be
And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or
provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as
citizens of the United States. What would be needed were Americans in successive
generations who were willing to do their part - through protests and struggle, on the streets
and in the courts, through a civil war and civil disobedience and always at great risk - to
narrow that gap between the promise of our ideals and the reality of their time.
This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this campaign - to continue the
long march of those who came before us, a march for a more just, more equal, more free,
more caring and more prosperous America. I chose to run for the presidency at this moment
in history because I believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of our time unless
we solve them together - unless we perfect our union by understanding that we may have
different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not look the same and we may
not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction -
Source:
http://www.barackobama.com/2008/03/18/remarks_of_senator_barack_obam_53.php
- Gibson, S. (2008). Reading aloud: A useful learning tool? ELT Journal, 62,1, 29-36.
- Shlain, L. (1999). The Alphabet versus the goddess. New York: Penguin Arkana.