Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
INDE
X
4.1. Introduction 82
4.4. Conclusion 94
Brad Ross
October 2006 THE ROLE OF THE BUSINESS MODEL IN CAPTURING VALUE FROM INNOVATION
CHAPTER 4
4.1.
INTRODUCTION
The primary reason for undertaking research on business models was to develop
and evaluate concepts and theories by using basic research methods in an
attempt to expand the limits of knowledge on the role of the business model in
capturing value from innovation.
The content of the research may suggest that a definition of the different types of
research be analysed and then applied to the problem definition. The research
method that will be used in this study is qualitative research.
When considering the merits of the qualitative research that has been used in
this paper it is imperative to consider the following phenomenon; contemporary
organisations are challenged to maintain a competitive advantage in an
environment characterized by constant change, surprise, disorder, ambiguities,
chaos, paradox and paradigm shifts. Organisations are accountable for the
bottom line as well as ample returns for the shareholders. Focusing on new
business is crucial but contributing resources to these new businesses in the face
Brainstorming bus ines s models and ways in which to take the company forwar d
are human by nature to the utmost extent. Contrary to conventional wisdom, it is
therefore argued that an organisations environment is not a set of independently
given facts, but is created by the interaction of its members with individuals
outside the organisation. As such, the individuals inside the organisation create
their own environments rather than adapt to the environment created by others
(Du Toit, 1996). Taking cognisance of theses developments, this research was
compelled to also rethink the business research paradigm adhered to. The
practice of management is determined by the prevailing management paradigm,
which in turn is influenced by changes and developments in the business
environment. It is therefore imperative that business research takes cognisance
of advancements in these fields and that the research approach allows for
incorporation.
Source: Fourie (1996: 248), Cassel & Symon (1994b: 7), Neuman (1994: 317)
Table 4-1 has identified some of the major differences between qualitative and
quantitative research approaches. The initial difference between the two methods
is that qualitative research uses a constructivist approach based on
phenomenological and interpretative paradigms whereas the quantitative
approach uses a positivist approach which assumes existing, objective truth
which can be revealed through a scientific method. One of the reasons that this
study has used qualitative research is due to the fact that with qualitative
research the procedures are not as strictly formalised, the scope is undefined
and there has being more of a philosophical mode of operation. Quantitative
research, however, addresses research in a more highly formalised and more
explicitly controlled method of research. The methods are more exactly defined
with methods closely related to that of the physical sciences.
Conventially the nature and emphasis in business res earch was placed on the
quantitative approach. A resistance to qualitative research noted in both
academic and disciplinary circles resulted in a longstanding debate between the
advocates of these two schools of thought (Wass & Wells, 1994: 31).
On the one hand, qualitative researches were called journalists, or soft scientists.
Their work was termed unscientific, only exploratory or entirely personal and full
of bias. Qualitative research findings were labelled as criticism and not as theory
(Denzin & Lincoln, 1994b:2). When considering the reasoning then for using
The reactions to these types of allegations was that a rigor of subtly associated
with qualitative research by no means implies a slovenly, undisciplined approach
to research, but that the particular demands of qualitative research makes it a
creative, scientific process that necessitates a great deal of time and critical
thinking, as well as emotional and intellectual energy. Qualitative researchers are
expected to have a true desire to discover meaning, develop understanding and
explain phenomena in the most thorough way possible. The triumph of qualitative
studies is said to be due more to dedication, hard work, sensitivity and writing
skills of the individual researches than to anything intrinsic in the research
approach itself (Neuman, 1994: 317). Mariano (in Leedy, 1993: 140) in fact
describes qualitative research as “. . . creative scholarship at its best”.
Advocates of qualitative research further argue that the limited and often
incorrect use of qualitative methods as well as the exaggerated reliance on
quantitative techniques is due not only to tradition, but also to ignorance within
both the academic and business community. This ignorance concerns the theory
of science as well as the choice and application of research methods and
techniques (Gummeson, 1991: 1).
The politics embedded in this field of discourse is taken even further by the
argument that the criticisms of qualitative research reflect an uneasy awareness
that the traditions of qualitative r esearch commit the researcher to a critique of
the positivist project. The positive sciences are often seen by their followers as
the crowning achievements of Western civilization, and in their practices it is
assumed that “truth” can transcend opinion and personal bias. Qualitative
research is hence seen as an assault on this tradition, whose adherents are said
to often retreat into a “value-free objectivist science” model to defend their
position. These researchers are accused of seldom attempting to make explicit,
or to critique the “moral and political commitments in their own contingent work”
(Denzin &Lincoln, 1994b: 4).
The word qualitative implies an emphasis on processes and meaning that are not
rigorously examined, or measured (if at all), in terms of quantity, amount,
intensity, or frequency. Qualitative researchers stress the socially constructed
nature of reality, the intimate relationship between the researcher and what is
studied, and the situational constraints that shape enquiry. Qualitative
researchers emphasise the value-laden nature of enquiry and seek answers to
questions that stress how social experience is created and given meaning
(Denzin & Lincoln, 1994b: 2). It is for these reasons that after careful
consideration that the qualitative research approach would be used in the
construction of this study.
4.3. RESEARCH
DESIGN
The research design refers to the master plan that specifies the methods and
procedures followed throughout this study. The objectives established during the
early stages of the research (see chapter 1, section 1.4) were included
throughout the design to ensure that the information collected is appropriate for
solving the identified problems. The following section comprises of exploratory
research and causal research.
The purpose of the exploratory research in the study was to narrow the scope of
the research topic and transform discovered problems into defined ones,
incorporating the specific research objectives. The method of exploratory
research implemented was the case study method and secondary data analysis.
The purpose of the case study method was to obtain information from situations
that were similar to the research problem as identified. This method allowed the
researcher to investigate the role that latent technology played in making Xerox
and certain spin-off companies the success stories that they are today.
Furthermore, exploratory research has been conducted to evaluate how
Standard Bank has successfully leveraged and implemented Internet based
technology in their Self-Service Banking offering by adapting their business
model to the demands of the financial business environment.
Secondary data analysis refers to the preliminary review of data collected for
another purpose to clarify issues in the early stages of the research effort. A
thorough literature review on business models, definitions, existing paradigms,
Xerox, Standard Bank and other companies was conducted in order to establish
a set of base data that could be referred to in addressing the problems and
meeting the objectives of the study.
The beginning process for the secondary data analysis was to delve into the
definition of business models and in so doing establish a base on which the
research framework could use as a platform to interrogate the problem definition
and research objectives. A myriad of business model definitions presented
themselves during this stage and some form of a usable definition was needed in
order to work towards the objectives. Business literature and specifically e-
commerce provided the working definition that was used during this study. The
data analysis from e-commerce journals and various websites proved invaluable
as it was biased towards linking a certain degr ee of technology into the
definitions presented.
The way in which the secondary data was gathered was through literature
searches on the World Wide Web using Google as a search engine as well and
library searches on interrelated topics where authors had published their
research and findings. Hard copies of magazines, reviews, published works and
numerous books were used in the process of secondary data analysis. Following
on to this was the use of the case study method which is explained in more detail
in the following section.
The purpose of the case study method is to obtain information from one or more
situations that are similar to the problem situation. The case study method refers
to an exploratory research technique that intensely investigates the problem
situation at hand. The case study of how Xerox implemented a flexible business
model in order to obtain economic value from the 914 photocopying machine that
was conducted by Henry Chesbrough and Steven Rosenbloom illustrated how
Xerox succ essfully implemented a risky yet sustainable business model and in
so doing created immense economic value and a competitive advantage for the
company.
Through exploratory research by using the case study method, Chesbrough and
Rosenbloom identified 35 spin-off companies that commercialized technology
emanating from Xerox’s initial technology. Rosenbloom and Chesbrough argue
that since the business m odels subsequent performance, it was therefore useful
to select cases where the primary elements of the model wer e not changed
appreciably. For the purposes of this study, six specific spin off companies were
This causal relationship has been identified as how the correct or incorrect
business model employed by a company may result in different outcomes based
on the business model that is chosen by the company. The illus tration of how
Xerox actually planned for success by following through on their ground breaking
technology of the 914 photo copy machine illustrates how a cause and effect
relationship existed within the Xerox situation. Stemming from the problem
statement as identified in section 1.3 of c hapter 1, Xerox prov ided a perfect case
scenario on how causal research was conducted. The problem had been
identified through the exploratory research conducted and further causal
research on other companies was therefore required to identify if there was a
certain degree of causal relationships among the business model and the
successful implementation of innovation thereof.
4.4.
CONCLUSION
This chapter has taken a look at the research methodology and design that has
been incorporated in this paper. The chapter begins by looking at the types of
research and by tabulating the differences between qualitative and quantitative
research approaches. This chapter further looks at the research design and the
use of structured questionnaires in obtaining primary data. In conclusion the
chapter looks at the importance of qualitative research and the reasoning behind
the choice of this research in this paper. The qualitative method that was chosen
was a more appropriate method for this study than using that of a quantitative
approach. Due to the fact that a hypothesis was not explicitly stated and
formulated before embarking on the research, meant that the qualitative research
approach allowed for a central thesis stated in form of a general research goal to
be undertaken.
Chapter five will interrogate the qualitative research presented throughout this
paper and present findings and conclusions with an emphasis on addressing the
problem statement and research objectives identified in chapter one of this study.
The chapter will begin with an overview to the theory presented. It will then
interpret and analyse the primary and secondary objectives and make
conclusions based on these. The last section of the chapter will tie up the
conclusions and present findings of the research. Chapter five will conclude the
cope of this study.