Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
By Claire M. Hay
Metropolitan State College of Denver
Earth and Atmospheric Science Department
gis48x0_techrept.doc
8 January 2005
GIS 4850 – Adv. GIS, or GIS 4840 – Remote Sensing Report Writing Requirements
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION______________________________________________________________________________ 1
I. ABSTRACT _________________________________________________________________________________ 1
V. TABLES ___________________________________________________________________________________ 5
i
GIS 4850 – Adv. GIS, or GIS 4840 – Remote Sensing Report Writing Requirements
INTRODUCTION
In order to gain practice and competence in report writing for projects involving GIS, remote sensing, and
spatial data analysis of natural resource environments, students will be required to document their work
using the report format described below. In this manner, it is hoped that the student will develop a technical
writing methodology that will reduce the sometimes ‘formidable’, report-writing task to a ‘doable’ effort
that can be approached in smaller bite-sized portions.
Students are expected to be familiar with word processing software available either in Campus Computer
Labs or on other systems available to them. ONLY word-processed reports, i.e. NO HANDWRITTEN or
typewritten reports, will be accepted.
REPORT FORMAT
For this class, you will use the following scientific and technical project report format for your lab reports.
The report consists of the following six sections:
I) Abstract
II) Body of the report,
III) Reference Section, (if any and if applicable)
IV) Model Illustrations (e.g., Flow Charts, figures, maps, etc.), if applicable
V) Tabular support data (Tables), if applicable
VI) Result Illustrations (e.g., Maps and figures), and
VII) Appendices (e.g., Command Listings, additional textual, tabular, or graphic material), if applicable.
A good report at a MINIMUM consists of sections II, III, IV, and V and/or VI, arranged in the sequence
outlined above.
The information to be presented in each of the above listed sections is as follows:
I. ABSTRACT
An abstract should be no more than 300 words. In the abstract, one briefly describes the purpose of the
report, the general approach taken in the analysis or study that is described in the report, the data used in the
analysis, the results achieved, and a brief summary of your results or findings.
1
GIS 4850 – Adv. GIS, or GIS 4840 – Remote Sensing Report Writing Requirements
A. INTRODUCTION Section
The introduction is a very important section in any report. The introduction serves to set the stage for the
work by describing your perspective on the problem and by describing the background context in which you
wish the reader to evaluate your work. If the reader is not fully familiar with the problem area, the
introduction should provide sufficient, general context so that a reader can determine the general knowledge
domain relating to the material in your report.
In this section you will present the CONTEXT for your work. The following questions should be addressed
and answered in this section.
1. WHAT is the MOTIVATION for the work you are about to describe, i.e., what situation, event, or
need (from a resource management point of view, not because it was required for class) prompted
the undertaking of this work or exercise?
For the purposes of this class, you can develop a hypothetical situation that may have motivated this
work. In other works, the motivation stated in your report should NOT state that “this work was
required as part of a laboratory exercise in class such and so”.
2. WHO should/would be interested in this report or study?
Briefly describe who should be interested in the analysis or study. That is, what type of resource
professionals, scientists, and technicians would be interested in the information produced from this
study.
3. WHY are they, or should they, be interested in this work?
Include brief statements of why they should be interested or how the study would relate to their
interest area.
4. What is the MAIN FOCUS of your study/exercise, and how will it significantly address the points in
items 1 through 3 above?
2
GIS 4850 – Adv. GIS, or GIS 4840 – Remote Sensing Report Writing Requirements
included within the model or management plan. The following questions are appropriately addressed in the
Design Criteria section:
1. What are the critical resources (data, supporting theory, money, time) that affect the results of the
model or management plan?
2. What are the specific, highest priority factors, or absolute requirements (e.g., maximum or minimum
levels of cost or production) that MUST be met or addressed by the model or plan if and when
implemented? Relevant statements might include example phrases such as “no construction will be
allowed on slopes steeper than 40%”, or “maintain hauling costs to less than $X per year”, etc.
3. What are other high priority items that are desirable to achieve but not mandatory, within the plan or
analysis?
4. What types of information or data are required to support the model or plan (e.g., “elevation data at
50 meters spatial resolution, and vegetation/land cover data with a minimum mapping area of 25
meters”)?
5. What significant flaws or deficits exist in the data set that are not fixable at this time and affect the
quality of the results from the model or plan implementation?
There may be other critical issues or requirements that need to be discussed within this section depending on
the specific project’s context and goals. What are they? Describe them and their significance to the project,
the model, the analysis, or the plan.
D. RESULTS Section
In the Results Section, briefly present the results or outcomes achieved in the project. In this section, a
DESCRIPTION of the results is all that is required- DO NOT include a DISCISSION of the
results in this section. For example,
GOOD Results Statement:
"Response times from station #1 to all locations within the planning area ranged from a maximum
of 25 minutes to a minimum of 2 minutes. Response times from station # 12 to all locations ranged
from a maximum of 35 minutes to a minimum of 6 minutes. Minimum response times from the most
3
GIS 4850 – Adv. GIS, or GIS 4840 – Remote Sensing Report Writing Requirements
optima, responding station to any specific location ranged from a maximum of 15 minutes to a
minimum of 2 minutes. See Figure 5 (Minimum response time map) for the distribution of minimum
response times over the planning area”.
Bad Results Statement in that it includes further discussion of the results. The discussion goes in the
Discussion section.
"Response times from station #1 to all locations within the planning area ranged from a maximum
of 25 minutes to a minimum of 2 minutes. The maximum of 25 minutes is beyond the allowable
limits allowed by the Fire District’s Terms of Service agreement with the County and a plan to
mitigate the response times for areas falling outside of the allowable limits is being developed.
4
GIS 4850 – Adv. GIS, or GIS 4840 – Remote Sensing Report Writing Requirements
V. TABLES
Any tables of data or results to which you refer in the body of the report can go here. It is also possible to
embed data tables in the Approach or Method Section, and table of results in the Results Section of the
report depending upon where they are referenced in the text.
VII. APPENDICES
Other material that may be of interest to the reader, and which provides more detailed support or data for the
project objective or approach can be placed in appendices at the end of the formal report.
5
GIS 4850 – Adv. GIS, or GIS 4840 – Remote Sensing Report Writing Requirements
6
GIS 4850 – Adv. GIS, or GIS 4840 – Remote Sensing Report Writing
Requirements
Table of Contents
ABSTRACT _________________________________________________________________________ 1
INTRODUCTION ____________________________________________________________________ 1
OBJECTIVE ________________________________________________________________________ 1
DESIGN CRITERIA__________________________________________________________________ 1
APPROACH ________________________________________________________________________ 1
RESULTS___________________________________________________________________________ 2
DISCUSSION________________________________________________________________________ 3
ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES ___________________________________________________________ 3
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS _____________________________________________________ 4
REFERENCES ______________________________________________________________________ 4
List of Figures
FIGURE 1: FLOWCHART POTENTIAL HOUSING SITE-SUITABILITY MODEL ...................................................... 2
FIGURE 2: FINAL MODEL OUTPUT SHOWING 3 CENSUS TRACTS WITHIN COBB COUNTY, GEORGIA THAT MET
ALL THREE MODEL CRITERIA. ................................................................................................................. 2
FIGURE 3: OUTPUT FROM ALTERNATIVE B. .................................................................................................... 4
List of Tables
i
GIS 4850 – Adv. GIS, or GIS 4840 – Remote Sensing Report Writing Requirements
Abstract
Introduction
A person with a family that includes school aged children is being transferred by their company from the
West Coast to Georgia. The family plans to buy a new house after arriving in Georgia. However, before
arriving in Georgia, the family would like to gain some idea of possible housing areas that might meet their
requirements for quality of life and schools for the children. The family is primarily interested in houses
within low population areas and in houses that are close to middle schools for the 13-year old daughter. The
employee’s company provides her with access to the ArcView Desktop GIS software and with a spatial data
set that consists of 1) Census Tract information containing population data for 1990, 2) Georgia County
boundary information, and 3) middle school location information for the State of Georgia. The employee
develops a simple site-suitability model to identify potential housing areas within Georgia that rudimentarily
meet the housing needs and desires of her family. The specification, implementation description, and results
of that site location model are described below.
Objective
The objective of this simple site-suitability model was to identify areas with low population levels that
contain middle schools within Cobb County, Georgia.
Design Criteria
Potential housing sites should be in lower population areas relative to the average population level of the
State of Georgia. In addition, the selected areas should be relatively close to middle schools so that the 13-
year old daughter can attend school within her own neighborhood. A review of taxing level data for the
State of Georgia, revels that Cobb County Georgia has lower tax levels than other counties in Georgia.
Thus, if the other two criteria described above are met, areas within Cobb County, Georgia are to be
preferred.
Approach
The model developed to identify potential housing areas that met the design criteria described above is
shown diagrammatically in Figure 1. The flowchart of the model identifies the required initial data inputs,
namely Census tract Data for Georgia that contains population information, county boundary information
for Georgia, and middle school location information for Georgia.
From the Census Tract population information for 1990, it was determined that the average population level
across all census tracts was 5,768 persons. Therefore ‘Low Population areas’ were defined as areas with a
1990 population level less than the average, i.e., with a population level < 5,768 persons. The Middle
School data was intersected with the Low Population information to determine whether any of the low
population areas contained middle schools. Several census blocks met both the Low Population criterion
and the middle School criterion. The intermediate output from the above overlay process was called ‘Low
Pop Areas w/Middle Schools’.
1
GIS 4850 – Adv. GIS, or GIS 4840 – Remote Sensing Report Writing Requirements
Lastly, from the Georgia County data Cobb County was selected since the tax levies for that county are
lower than other Georgia counties. The Cobb County boundary area was intersected with the ‘Low Pop
Areas w/Middle Schools’ information to determine whether any areas met all three design criteria.
<Notice, I haven’t told you yet whether any areas met all three design criteria. That information goes in the
results section.>
Results
The results of the Housing Site-Suitability model are shown in Figure 2 below. It can be seen that three
census tracts (shown in yellow) within Cobb County met all three site-selection criteria.
F
i
g
u
re 2: Final Model Output showing 3 census
tracts within Cobb County, Georgia that
met all three model criteria.
2
GIS 4850 – Adv. GIS, or GIS 4840 – Remote Sensing Report Writing Requirements
Discussion
The priority criteria to be met were low population amount and close to middle schools. The third criterion -
located with Cobb County was desired but not required in comparison to the other two criteria. Luckily, all
three model criteria were found to be met within 3 census tracts in Cobb County. It was possible however,
that Cobb County might not have contained low population areas with middle schools. In that case, other
census tact areas of Low Population with middle schools outside of Cobb County would have been
considered.
The low population criterion was implemented based upon total population level within each census block.
Since the census blocks were not of equal geographic size a better criterion would have been to use
population density (population/sq. mi). Areas were selected as ‘low population’ solely on the basis of total
population within the boundaries of the census block. However, several census blocks were selected
because their total population was relatively low. Their population levels were low only because the area of
the census block was very small. In fact these census blocks had very high population densities, thus
violating the intent of the ‘Low Population’ criterion.
Alternative Approaches
The model could
Table 1: Portion of edited Attribute Table
have been enhanced
had population
density (persons per
acre) been used
instead of absolute
population numbers.
If the size of the
census tracts were all
about the same then a
‘de facto’ population
density would have
been implied.
However, the census
tracts did not all have
roughly the same area. To evaluate the effect of using population density instead of absolute population
levels, the model was rerun. First a population density field was added to the Census tract data. The
population density field was used to determine areas of low population instead of the absolute population
(pop_90) field. A portion of the edited Attribute table with the additional ‘population Density’ field added
is shown in Table 1: Portion of edited Attribute Table. The results of the second analysis are shown in
Figure 3. As can be seen by comparing Figure 2 with Figure 3 there are still areas with in Cobb County that
meet all three model criteria, however, the census tracts selected based upon absolute population level are
different than those selected using population density.
3
GIS 4850 – Adv. GIS, or GIS 4840 – Remote Sensing Report Writing Requirements
References
ESRI, 1992-2000. Getting to Know ArcView GIS. ESRI Press.