Financial Inclusion

1
 DECLARATION

I, Abhishek Rajput, hereby attest that the facts and figures presented in this
project work have been incorporated from authentic sources, and an
independent interpretation has been given thereof.

Abhishek Rajput

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I am thankful to Ms. Shalini Aggarval, my mentor for this project work, for the
guidance and support that she has extended throughout the course of this
project. Without her valuable contribution, this project work would not have
been possible.

Abhishek Rajput
2
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter No. Particulars Page No.

Introduction
I 4

Financial Inclusion in India

II 12

Banking in India: A Glimpse

III 19

Analytical Review
IV 25

Summary & Conclusion

V 29

Bibliography 37

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION

3
F inancial inclusion is the delivery of financial services at affordable costs to vast sections
of disadvantaged and low income groups. Unrestrained access to public goods and services
is a prerequisite of an open and efficient society. It is argued that as banking services are in the
nature of public good, it is essential that availability of banking and payment services to the
entire population without discrimination is the prime objective of public policy.

The Scottish Government defines financial inclusion as:

“Access for individuals to appropriate financial products and services, this includes people
having the skills, knowledge and understanding to make best use of those products and services.
Financial exclusion is often a symptom of poverty as well as a cause.”

The term "financial inclusion" has gained importance since the early 2000s, and is a result of
findings about financial exclusion and its direct correlation to poverty. Financial inclusion is now
a common objective for many central banks among the developing nations.

On 29 December 2003, Former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan said:”The stark reality is that
most poor people in the world still lack access to sustainable financial services, whether it is
savings, credit or insurance. The great challenge before us is to address the constraints that
exclude people from full participation in the financial sector. Together, we can and must build
inclusive financial sectors that help people improve their lives.”

According to the United Nations the main goals of Financial Inclusion are as follows:

4
1. Access at a reasonable cost of all households and enterprises to the range of financial
services for which they are “bankable,” including savings, short and long-term credit,
leasing and factoring, mortgages, insurance, pensions, payments, local money transfers
and international remittances

2. Sound institutions, guided by appropriate internal management systems, industry

performance standards, and performance monitoring by the market, as well as by sound
prudential regulation where required

3. Financial and institutional sustainability as a means of providing access to financial

services over time

4. Multiple providers of financial services, wherever feasible, so as to bring cost-effective

and a wide variety of alternatives to customers (which could include any number of
combinations of sound private, non-profit and public providers).

Financial Inclusion Includes Accessing of Financial Products and Services like:

 Savings facility

 Credit and debit cards access

 Electronic fund transfer

 All kinds of commercial loans

 Overdraft facility

 Cheque facility

 Payment and remittance services

 Low cost financial services

 Insurance (Medical insurance)

5
 Financial advice

 Pension for old age and investment schemes

 Access to financial markets

 Micro credit during emergency

 Entrepreneurial credit

Financial Inclusion aims at including financially excluded people under the financial
services umbrella. Financially Excluded People largely comprise of:

 Marginal farmers

 Landless laborers

 Oral lessees

 Self employed and unorganized sector enterprises

 Urban slum dwellers

 Migrants

 Ethnic minorities and socially excluded groups

 Senior citizens

 Women

 The North East, Eastern and Central regions contain most of the financially excluded
population.

There are number of factors due to which these people are excluded from financial
network. Factors affecting access to financial services:

6
 Legal identity: Lack of legal identity like voter id, driving license, birth certificates,
employment identity card etc

 Limited literacy: Particularly financial literacy and lack of basic education prevent
people to have access from financial services.

 Level of income: Level of income decides to have financial access. Low income people
generally have the attitude of thinking that banks are only for rich.

 Terms and conditions: While getting loans or at the time of opening accounts banks
places many conditions , so the uneducated and poor people find it very difficult to access
financial services .

 Complicated procedures: Due to lack of financial literacy and basic education, it is very
difficult for those people who lack both to read terms and conditions and account filling
forms.

 Psychological and cultural barriers: Many people voluntarily excluded themselves due
to psychological barriers and they think that they are excluded from accessing financial
services.

 Place of living: As the name suggests that commercial banks operate only in
commercially profitable areas and they set up branches and main offices only in that
areas .People who lived in under developed areas finds it very difficult to go to areas in
which banks are generally reside.

 Lack of awareness: Finally, people who lack basic education do not know the
importance of the financial products like Insurance, Finance, Bank Accounts, cheque
facility, etc.

Financial Exclusion hampers the overall growth mechanism of an economy.

Consequences of Financial Exclusion:

7
 Losing opportunities to grow: In the absence of finance, people who are not connected
with formal financial system lack opportunities to grow.

 Country's growth will retard: Due to vast unutilized resources that is in the form of
money in the hands of people who lack financial inclusive services.

Other Consequences:

 Business loss to banks: Banks will loss business if this condition persists for ever due to
lack of opening of bank accounts.

 Exclusion from mainstream society: The people, who lack financial services, presumed
that they are excluded from mainstream society.

 All transactions cannot be made in cash: Some transactions can be made in cash. In
this technological world everybody wants to have electronic cash system like debit and
credit cards and also EFT.

 Loss of opportunities to thrift and borrow: Financially excluded people, may lose
chances to save their some part of livelihood earnings and also to borrow loans.

 Employment barriers: Nowadays all salary and other financial benefits from various
sources like Governments scholarships, any compensation, grants, reliefs, etc are paid
through bank accounts.

 Loss due to theft: Banks provide various schemes of safety locker facility. It mitigates
the risk due to thefts.

 Other allied financial services: People who do not have bank accounts may not go to
bank as for as possible. So they lack basic financial auxiliary services like DD, Insurance
cover and other emergency need loans Etc.

When financial services are accessible by financially excluded people, it yields a number
of benefits. Benefits of Inclusive Financial Growth:

8
 Growth with equity: In the path of super power we the Indians will need to achieve the
growth of our country with equality. It is provided by inclusive finance.

 Get rid of poverty: To remove poverty from the Indian context all everybody will be
given access to formal financial services. Because if they borrow loans for business or
education or any other purpose they get the loan will pave way for their development.

 Financial Transactions Made Easy: Inclusive finance will provide banking related
financial transactions in an easy and speedy way.

 Safe savings along with financial services : People will have safe savings along with
other allied services like insurance cover , entrepreneurial loans , payment and settlement
facility etc,

 Inflating National Income: Boosting up business opportunities will definitely increase

GDP and which will be reflected in our national income growth.

 Becoming Global Player: Financial access will attract global market players to our
country that will result in increasing employment and business opportunities.

Financial Inclusion is an important parameter of development of an economy.

Relationship between Financial Inclusion and Development Indicators:

 Economic growth follows financial inclusion. In order to achieve the objective of growth
with equity, it is imperative that infrastructure is developed with financial inclusion.

 Savings and credit accounts - indicators of financial inclusion.

 per capita income - indicator of economic development

 Electricity consumption and road length -indicators of infrastructure development.

Taking into account their seasonal Inflow of Income from agricultural operations, migration
from one place to another, seasonal and irregular work availability and income; the existing

9
 financial system needs to be designed to suit their requirements. Expectations of poor
people from financial system:

 Security and safety of deposits

 Low transaction cost

 Convenient operating time

 Minimum paper work

 Frequent deposits

 Quick and easy access

 Product suitable to income and consumption

The idea of financial inclusion is well complemented by microfinance. Microfinance

programmes are intended to reach poor segments of society as they lack access to financial
services. It, therefore, holds greater promise to further the agenda of financial inclusion as it
seeks to reach out to the excluded category of population from the banking services.

MICROFINANCE

10
 

Microfinance in India started in the early 1980s with small efforts at forming informal self-help
groups (SHG) to provide access to much-needed savings and credit services. From this small
beginning, the microfinance sector has grown significantly in the past decades. National bodies
like the Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) and the National Bank for
Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) are devoting significant time and financial
resources to microfinance. These point to the growing importance of the sector. The strength of
the microfinance organizations (MFOs) in India is in the diversity of approaches and forms that
have evolved over time. In addition to the home-grown models of SHGs and mutually aided
cooperative societies (MACS), the country has learned from other microfinance experiments
across the world, particularly those in Bangladesh, Indonesia, Thailand, and Bolivia, in terms of
delivery of micro financial services.

In India, microfinance is done by organizations having diverse orientations, NGOs in India

perform a range of developmental activities; microfinance usually is a sub-component. Some of
these NGOs organize groups and link them to an existing provider of financial services. In some
cases NGOs have a “revolving fund” that is used for lending. But in either of these cases,
microfinance is not a core activity for these NGOs. An example is the Aga Khan Rural Support
Programme India (AKRSP-I). For AKRSP-I, the microfinance component is incidental to its
work in natural resource management. Examples like MYRADA and the Self-Employed
Women’s Association (SEWA) fall in the same category. However, as their microfinance
portfolios grew, both organizations decided to form separate entities for microfinance.
MYRADA set up an MFO called Sanghamitra Rural Financial Services (SRFS), while SEWA

11
set up the SEWA Cooperative Bank. At the next level, we find NGOs helping the poor in
economic activities. Their purpose is developmental. They see microfinance as an activity that
feeds into economic activities. For instance, the South Indian Federation of Fishermen’s
Societies (SIFFS) started as a support organization for fishermen, providing technical and
marketing support.

A BRIEF HISTORY

The Indian Government has a long history of working to expand financial inclusion. The
nationalization of major commercial banks in 1969 was an important landmark in the history of
financial inclusion. It was felt that the nationalized banks can make a big push into the rural
areas. In 1975, Government of India established Regional Rural Banks with the same aim. It
encouraged branch expansion of bank branches especially in rural areas. The RBI guidelines to
banks show that 40% of their net bank credit should be lent to the priority sector. This mainly
consists of agriculture, small scale industries, retail trade etc. More than 80% of our population
depends directly or indirectly on agriculture. So 18% of net bank credit should go to agriculture
lending. Recent simplification of KYC norms are another milestone.

An important development in the last 15-odd years has been the organization of Self-Help
Groups (SHGs) or small groups of people who could borrow from the banking system. Self Help

12
Groups are playing a very important role in the process of financial inclusion. SHGs are usually
groups of women who get together and pool money from their savings and lend money among
them. Usually they are working with the support of an NGO. The SHG is given loans against the
group members’ guarantee. Peer pressure within the group helps in improving recoveries.
Through SHGs nearly 40 million households are linking with the banks. Micro finance is another
tool which links low income groups to the banks. In some ways the SHGs movement has been a
success. But it is also seen that it is concentrated much more in the South and therefore there is a
regional disparity in terms of the growth of the SHGs.

CHAPTER II: FINANCIAL INCLUSION IN INDIA

The Honorable Finance Minister in the Union Budget 2005-06, announced as under:

Government intends to continue with its effort to turn the focus of commercial banks, regional
rural banks (RRBs) and cooperative banks towards providing credit, especially production
credit, to rural households. Particularly in agriculture credit, innovations are possible. I
propose to request the Reserve Bank of India to examine the issue of allowing banks to adopt the
“agency model” by using the infrastructure of civil society organizations, rural kiosks and
village knowledge centre, to provide credit support to rural and farm sectors.

At present, micro finance institutions (MFIs) obtain finance from banks according to guidelines
issued by RBI. MFIs seek to provide small scale credit and other financial services to low
income households and small informal businesses. Government intends to promote MFIs in a big
way. The way forward, I believe, is to identify MFIs, classify and rate such institutions, and
empower them to intermediate between the lending banks and the beneficiaries. Commercial
banks may appoint MFIs as “banking correspondents” to provide transaction services on their
behalf.

13
Following the above announcements, RBI constituted an Internal Group to examine issues
relating to rural credit and microfinance with Shri H.R. Khan, then Chief General Manager and
Principal, College of Agricultural Banking (CAB), RBI, Pune as the Chairman. To deepen and
widen the financial services provided by banks particularly to the under serviced areas and the
rural poor, the Group suggested two models, viz. the Business Facilitator Model and the
Business Correspondent Model for providing non financial support services and financial
services as pass “pass through” agents respectively by leveraging MFIs / NGOs, Civil Society
Organisations and other external entities. The group also made recommendations relating to
promotion, development and rating of MFIs and other outreach entities and mechanisms
including widespread use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for expansion
of banking outreach in a convenient, secured and cost effective manner.

Based on the recommendations of the above internal group, the Reserve Bank of India permitted
banks to utilize the services of non-governmental organizations, MFIs (other than non banking
financial companies) and other civil society organizations as intermediaries in providing
financial and banking services through the use of Business Facilitator (BF) and Business
Correspondent (BCs) models.

BUSINESS FACILITATOR MODEL

The BFs were allowed to undertake facilitation services like identification of borrowers and
fitment of activities; collection and preliminary processing of loan applications including
verification of primary information/data; creating awareness about savings and other products
and education and advice on managing money and debt counseling; processing and submission
of applications to banks; promoting and nurturing Self Help Groups/ Joint Liability Groups; post

14
sanctions monitoring; monitoring and handholding of Self Help Groups/ Joint Liability Groups/
Credit Groups/ others; and follow up for recovery.

Under the BF model, banks were permitted to use intermediaries such as, NGOs/ Farmers’
Clubs, cooperatives, community based organizations, IT enabled rural outlets of corporate
entities, Post offices, insurance agents, well functioning Panchayat, Village knowledge centers,
Agri Clinics/ Agri Business Centers, Krishi Vigyan Kendras and KVIC/ KVIB units, depending
on the comfort level of the bank, for providing facilitation services. As these services were not
intended to involve the conduct of banking business by BFs, no approval was required by banks
from Reserve Bank for using the above intermediaries for facilitation of the services.

BUSINESS CORRESPONDENT MODEL

As regard the BCs, in addition to activities listed under the BF model, the scope of activities that
could be undertaken included i) disbursal of small value credit, ii) recovery of principal /
collection of interest iii) collection of small value deposits iv) sale of micro insurance/ mutual
fund products/ pension products/ other third party products and v) receipt and delivery of small
value remittances/ other payment institutions. The activities to be undertaken by the BCs were to
be within the normal course of the bank’s banking business, but conducted through the permitted
entities at places other than the bank premises.

As per the extant guidelines, the following entities can act as BCs of banks:

(i) NGOs/ MFIs set up under Societies/ Trust Acts;

(ii) Societies registered under Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Acts or the
Cooperative Societies Acts of States;

15
 (iii) Section 25 companies that are stand alone entities or in which NBFCs, banks, telecom
companies and other corporate entities or their holding companies do not have equity
holdings in excess of 10%;

(iv) Post Offices; and

(v) Retired bank employees, ex-servicemen and retired government employees.

While appointing individuals as BCs, banks have to ensure that these individuals are permanent
residents of the area in which they propose to operate as BCs and also institute additional
safeguards as appropriate to minimize agency risk.

Payment of commission/ fees for engagement of BFs/BCs

Banks were permitted to pay reasonable commission/ fee to the BFs and BCs and were advised
that the rate and quantum of the same may be reviewed periodically. It was also stipulated that
the agreement with the BF/ BC should specifically prohibit them from charging any fee to the
customers directly for services rendered by them on behalf of the bank.

Capacity building of BCs

In order to strengthen the capacity building of BCs/BFs, the Indian Institute of Banking and
Finance (IIBF) is offering a certification course and NABARD has advised the banks that
support in the form of meeting a part of the costs will be provided from the Financial Inclusion
Fund to the successful candidates, subject to certain conditions.

Risk mitigation

Banks were advised that as the engagement of intermediaries as BFs/ BCs involves significant
reputational, legal and operational risks, due consideration should be given by banks to these
risks. They should also endeavor to adopt technology-based solutions for managing the risk,

16
besides increasing the outreach in a cost effective manner. It was stipulated that the arrangements
with the BCs shall specify:

i) Suitable limits on cash holding by intermediaries as also limits on individual

customer payments and receipts

ii) The requirement that the transactions are accounted for and reflected in the bank's
books by end of day or next working day; and

iii) All agreements/ contracts with the customer shall clearly specify that the bank is
responsible to the customer for acts of omission and commission of the BF/BC.

Grievance redressal

Banks were advised to constitute Grievance Redressal Machinery within the bank for redressing
complaints about services rendered by BFs /BCs and give wide publicity about it through
electronic and print media. It has also been stipulated that the name and contact number of
designated Grievance Redressal Officer of the bank should be made known and widely
publicised. The designated officer is to ensure that genuine grievances of customers are redressed
promptly. Banks were also advised that their grievance redressal procedure and the time frame
fixed for responding to the complaints should be placed on the bank's website. Further, if a
complainant does not get satisfactory response from the bank within 60 days from the date of his
lodging the compliant, he will have the option to approach the Office of the Banking
Ombudsman concerned for redressal of his grievance/s.

Compliance with Know Your Customer (KYC) Norms

The banks were advised that compliance with KYC norms will continue to be the responsibility
of banks and since the objective was to extend savings and loan facilities to the underprivileged
and unbanked population, banks may adopt a flexible approach within the parameters of
guidelines issued on KYC from time to time. It was also clarified that in addition to introduction
from any person on whom KYC has been done, banks can also rely on certificates of
identification issued by the intermediary being used as BC, Block Development Officer (BDO),

17
head of Village Panchayat, Post Master of the post office concerned or any other public
functionary, known to the bank.

Oversight of operations of BC

With a view to ensuring adequate supervision over the operations and activities of the BCs by
banks, it has been stipulated that every BC will be attached to and be under the oversight of a
specific bank branch to be designated as the base branch. The distance between the place of
business of a BC and the base branch, ordinarily, should not exceed 30 kms in rural, semi-urban
and urban areas.

In metropolitan centers, the distance could be up to 5 kms. However, in case a need is felt to
relax the distance criterion, the matter can be referred to the District Consultative Committee
(DCC) of the district concerned for approval. Where such relaxations cover adjoining districts,
the matter may be cleared by the State Level Bankers' Committee (SLBC), which shall also be
the concerned forum for metropolitan areas. Such requests may be considered by the DCC/SLBC
on merits in respect of under-banked areas or where the population is scattered over large area
and where the need to provide banking services is imperative but having a branch may not be
viable, keeping in view the ability of the base branch of the bank making the request to exercise
sufficient oversight on the BC. Where currently BCs are operating beyond the distance limits
specified above, DCC/SLBC may be kept informed and steps should be taken to conform to the
stipulated limits within six months time, unless specific approval is accorded by the DCC/SLBC
on the grounds indicated above.

Appointment of sub-agents

It has been advised that in case the duly appointed BCs of banks desire to appoint sub-agents at
the grass root level to render the services of a BC, banks have to ensure that the sub-agents of
BCs fulfill all relevant criteria stipulated for BCs and the BC appointed by them carries out
proper due diligence in respect of the sub-agent to take care of the reputational and other risks
involved and the distance criteria from the base branch. It has also been made clear that where
individuals have been appointed as BCs, they cannot in turn appoint sub- agents.

18
Monitoring

Banks have been advised that the implementation of the BF/BC model should be closely
monitored by controlling authorities of banks, who should specifically look into the functioning
of BF/BCs during their course of their periodical visits to the branches. Further, banks should
also put in place an institutionalized system for periodically reviewing the implementation of the
BF/BC model at the Board level.

ROAD MAP FOR FUTURE

The Working Group is of the view that banks would need to accept the BC model as extremely
vital for achieving the goals of financial inclusion. As the traditional ‘brick and mortar’ branches
can penetrate into remote areas of our vast country only to a limited extent, this model presents
banks with a workable option to provide banking services in hitherto inaccessible areas in a cost-
effective manner. As recommended by the High Power Committee to Review the Lead Bank
Scheme in its draft report, the objective of having a banking outlet at every village with a
population of over 2000 at least once a week on a regular basis by March 2011 can be achieved
by substantially scaling up the BC model.

Ensuring viability of BC

19
In order to make the model successful, banks may have to handhold the BCs in the initial years
of operations. This may even require some financial support from banks, especially when the
BCs appointed are individuals. The banks may adopt any permitted entity as its BC and to begin
with carry out pilots to ascertain its compatibility to the operations of the bank. The successful
model may be replicated.

BCs to be used for full range of services

BCs should be used not only for opening and servicing no-frills accounts but for the full range of
financial activities as mentioned in Section III. Further, with the Central and State Governments
planning to route various government payments through the banking system, the BCs could be
the ideal medium for the banks to handle the huge volumes of low value transactions.

ICT enabled BC model

Experience has shown that the BC model coupled with ICT solutions can help banks
substantially increase their outreach facilitating financial inclusion. While adopting technology
solutions, it has to be borne in mind that they have to be interoperable, secure and amenable to
audit following widely accepted open standards. There is no uniform or unique model ideally
suited to the whole country that can be suggested. Accordingly, banks may choose from the
range of available models and adapt any of them depending upon the requirements.

CHAPTER III: BANKING IN INDIA: A GLIMPSE

Banking in India originated in the last decades of the 18th century. The first banks were The
General Bank of India which started in 1786, and the Bank of Hindustan, both of which are now
defunct. The oldest bank in existence in India is the State Bank of India, which originated in the
Bank of Calcutta in June 1806, which almost immediately became the Bank of Bengal. This was
one of the three presidency banks, the other two being the Bank of Bombay and the Bank of
Madras, all three of which were established under charters from the British East India Company.
For many years the Presidency banks acted as quasi-central banks, as did their successors. The

20
three banks merged in 1921 to form the Imperial Bank of India, which, upon India's
independence, became the State Bank of India.

Indian merchants in Calcutta established the Union Bank in 1839, but it failed in 1848 as a
consequence of the economic crisis of 1848-49. The Allahabad Bank, established in 1865 and
still functioning today, is the oldest Joint Stock bank in India.(Joint Stock Bank: A company that
issues stock and requires shareholders to be held liable for the company's debt) It was not the
first though. That honor belongs to the Bank of Upper India, which was established in 1863, and
which survived until 1913, when it failed, with some of its assets and liabilities being transferred
to the Alliance Bank of Simla.

When the American Civil War stopped the supply of cotton to Lancashire from the Confederate
States, promoters opened banks to finance trading in Indian cotton. With large exposure to
speculative ventures, most of the banks opened in India during that period failed. The depositors
lost money and lost interest in keeping deposits with banks. Subsequently, banking in India
remained the exclusive domain of Europeans for next several decades until the beginning of the
20th century.

Foreign banks too started to arrive, particularly in Calcutta, in the 1860s. The Comptoire
d'Escompte de Paris opened a branch in Calcutta in 1860, and another in Bombay in 1862;
branches in Madras and Puducherry, then a French colony, followed. HSBC established itself in
Bengal in 1869. Calcutta was the most active trading port in India, mainly due to the trade of the
British Empire, and so became a banking center.

The first entirely Indian joint stock bank was the Oudh Commercial Bank, established in 1881 in
Faizabad. It failed in 1958. The next was the Punjab National Bank, established in Lahore in
1895, which has survived to the present and is now one of the largest banks in India.

Around the turn of the 20th Century, the Indian economy was passing through a relative period
of stability. Around five decades had elapsed since the Indian Mutiny, and the social, industrial
and other infrastructure had improved. Indians had established small banks, most of which
served particular ethnic and religious communities.

21
The presidency banks dominated banking in India but there were also some exchange banks and
a number of Indian joint stock banks. All these banks operated in different segments of the
economy. The exchange banks, mostly owned by Europeans, concentrated on financing foreign
trade. Indian joint stock banks were generally undercapitalized and lacked the experience and
maturity to compete with the presidency and exchange banks. This segmentation let Lord Curzon
to observe, "In respect of banking it seems we are behind the times. We are like some old
fashioned sailing ship, divided by solid wooden bulkheads into separate and cumbersome
compartments."

The period between 1906 and 1911, saw the establishment of banks inspired by the Swadeshi
movement. The Swadeshi movement inspired local businessmen and political figures to found
banks of and for the Indian community. A number of banks established then have survived to the
present such as Bank of India, Corporation Bank, Indian Bank, Bank of Baroda, Canara Bank
and Central Bank of India.

The fervor of Swadeshi movement lead to establishing of many private banks in Dakshina
Kannada and Udupi district which were unified earlier and known by the name South Canara
(South Kanara) district. Four nationalised banks started in this district and also a leading private

22
sector bank. Hence undivided Dakshina Kannada district is known as Cradle of Indian Banking.

23
Post-independence

The partition of India in 1947 adversely impacted the economies of Punjab and West Bengal,
paralyzing banking activities for months. India's independence marked the end of a regime of the
Laissez-faire for the Indian banking. The Government of India initiated measures to play an
active role in the economic life of the nation, and the Industrial Policy Resolution adopted by the
government in 1948 envisaged a mixed economy. This resulted into greater involvement of the
state in different segments of the economy including banking and finance. The major steps to
regulate banking included:

* The Reserve Bank of India, India's central banking authority, was nationalized on January 1,
1949 under the terms of the Reserve Bank of India (Transfer to Public Ownership) Act, 1948
(RBI, 2005b).[Reference www.rbi.org.in]

* In 1949, the Banking Regulation Act was enacted which empowered the Reserve Bank of
India (RBI) "to regulate, control, and inspect the banks in India."

* The Banking Regulation Act also provided that no new bank or branch of an existing bank
could be opened without a license from the RBI, and no two banks could have common
directors.

However, despite these provisions, control and regulations, banks in India except the State Bank
of India or SBI, continued to be owned and operated by private persons. By the 1960s, the Indian
banking industry had become an important tool to facilitate the development of the Indian
economy. At the same time, it had emerged as a large employer, and a debate had ensued about
the possibility to nationalize the banking industry. Indira Gandhi, the-then Prime Minister of
India expressed the intention of the GOI in the annual conference of the All India Congress
Meeting in a paper entitled "Stray thoughts on Bank Nationalization." The paper was received
with positive enthusiasm.

Nationalization

24
Thereafter, her move was swift and sudden. The GOI issued an ordinance and nationalised the 14
largest commercial banks with effect from the midnight of July 19, 1969. Jayaprakash Narayan,
a national leader of India, described the step as a "masterstroke of political sagacity." Within two
weeks of the issue of the ordinance, the Parliament passed the Banking Companies (Acquisition
and Transfer of Undertaking) Bill, and it received the presidential approval on 9 August 1969.

A second dose of nationalization of 6 more commercial banks followed in 1980. The stated
reason for the nationalization was to give the government more control of credit delivery. With
the second dose of nationalization, the GOI controlled around 91% of the banking business of
India. Later on, in the year 1993, the government merged New Bank of India with Punjab
National Bank. It was the only merger between nationalized banks and resulted in the reduction
of the number of nationalised banks from 20 to 19. After this, until the 1990s, the nationalised
banks grew at a pace of around 4%, closer to the average growth rate of the Indian economy.

Liberalization

In the early 1990s, the then Narsimha Rao government embarked on a policy of liberalization,
licensing a small number of private banks. These came to be known as New Generation tech-
savvy banks, and included Global Trust Bank (the first of such new generation banks to be set
up), which later amalgamated with Oriental Bank of Commerce, Axis Bank(earlier as UTI
Bank), ICICI Bank and HDFC Bank. This move, along with the rapid growth in the economy of
India, revitalized the banking sector in India, which has seen rapid growth with strong
contribution from all the three sectors of banks, namely, government banks, private banks and
foreign banks.

The next stage for the Indian banking has been set up with the proposed relaxation in the norms
for Foreign Direct Investment, where all Foreign Investors in banks may be given voting rights
which could exceed the present cap of 10%, at present it has gone up to 74% with some
restrictions. The new policy shook the Banking sector in India completely. Bankers, till this time,
were used to the 4-6-4 method (Borrow at 4%; Lend at 6%; Go home at 4) of functioning. The
new wave ushered in a modern outlook and tech-savvy methods of working for traditional banks.
All this led to the retail boom in India. People not just demanded more from their banks but also
received more.

25
Currently (2007), banking in India is generally fairly mature in terms of supply, product range
and reach-even though reach in rural India still remains a challenge for the private sector and
foreign banks. In terms of quality of assets and capital adequacy, Indian banks are considered to
have clean, strong and transparent balance sheets relative to other banks in comparable
economies in its region. The Reserve Bank of India is an autonomous body, with minimal
pressure from the government. The stated policy of the Bank on the Indian Rupee is to manage
volatility but without any fixed exchange rate-and this has mostly been true.

With the growth in the Indian economy expected to be strong for quite some time-especially in
its services sector-the demand for banking services, especially retail banking, mortgages and
investment services are expected to be strong. One may also expect M&As, takeovers, and asset
sales.

In March 2006, the Reserve Bank of India allowed Warburg Pincus to increase its stake in Kotak
Mahindra Bank (a private sector bank) to 10%. This is the first time an investor has been allowed
to hold more than 5% in a private sector bank since the RBI announced norms in 2005 that any
stake exceeding 5% in the private sector banks would need to be vetted by them.

In recent years critics have charged that the non-government owned banks are too aggressive in
their loan recovery efforts in connection with housing, vehicle and personal loans. There are
press reports that the banks' loan recovery efforts have driven defaulting borrowers to suicide.

26
CHAPTER IV: ANALYTICAL REVIEW
In India, nearly 70% of the people are estimated to be excluded from formal financial services. It
is clear that the traditional model of delivery of banking services, in a bank branch, is not
appropriate for the poor for two important reasons. First, because the size of the transaction
services needed by the poor are small, the transactions costs as a proportion of the amount
transacted are way too high in the traditional branch banking model. Second, the poor are
uncomfortable transacting in a bank branch because it is inconvenient, takes a long time and the
procedures are too long and confusing for them. So if financial services are to become a reality,
they will have to be delivered in non-traditional places and the costs of transactions will have to
be brought nearly close to zero.

The Working Group sought information from banks as well as stakeholders with regard to
experience in using BCs as agents of banks. The response received has been varied. Although a
variety of entities/ individuals have been permitted by the Reserve Bank to act as BCs, only a
few have actually been so engaged.

27
Information was sought from banks regarding the number of BCs employed by them and the
number of no-frills accounts opened through the BC model. The data received is presented in
Annex I. It may be seen that while some public sector banks and a few private sector banks have
experimented with the model, none of the foreign banks have done so. Overall, the data reveals
that out of 50 public sector and private sector banks, only 26 banks have so far reported
appointing BCs, through which 88.60 lakhs no-frills accounts have been opened as on March 31,
2009. The number of accounts opened forms only 26.82 per cent of the no-frills accounts
reported to be opened by banks so far. Most of the banks that have employed BCs have
appointed Section 25 companies/ Trusts/ Societies as BCs. Further, almost all the Section 25
companies appointed as BCs have been floated by the technology service providers who had
provided the smart card or biometric solutions for account openings, etc.

The Group also attempted to gather some details of field level feedback regarding the BC model,
based on experience of the various banks. The same are presented in Annex II.

Issues highlighted

28
The Working Group, through its interactions with various stakeholders, was apprised of various
issues which have arisen during the implementation of the BC model. These are presented in the
following paragraphs.

(i) Cash handling

As almost all BC transactions are cash based, the flow of cash with BCs has been highlighted as
the biggest issue. Besides the logistics of handling large volumes of cash, it leads to increased
costs and added operational risks. These assume greater importance in the context of the North
Eastern region of the country, on account of higher security risks, vast and difficult terrain and
poor connectivity.

(ii) Client Profile

Beneficiaries of BC services are mostly illiterate and susceptible to misguidance. Further, at

times, clients tend to perceive the BCs themselves as banks and as not functioning on behalf of
the banks.

Lack of proper financial education of the clientele was a barrier to the effective utilization of the
banking facility provided to the clients through the BC model.

(iii) Viability issues

The viability of the BC model has remained the most critical issue which has led to the model
not taking off as envisaged. There have been various factors which have contributed to this issue.
A majority of no-frill accounts opened by BCs have remained non-operational. As such, opening
of the accounts to provide deposit services to begin with and subsequently widen the coverage of
activities, with a view to making these accounts profitable, have not made the desired progress.
Retaining customers after the initial transactions proves to be a big challenge. The Group has
received feedback that there is a mismatch between the revenues earned and costs incurred while
undertaking the BC operations, resulting in non-viability of the model.

It has been reported that banks charge interest to BCs for the temporary
accommodation/overdraft provided by banks to them. This adds to the operating costs of the

29
BCs. Moreover, the insurance costs as well as security costs for the cash-in-transit are also
passed on to the BCs, which affect their viability.

Where the BCs have to cover large distances, the transport cost often becomes prohibitive.
Further, where power supply is a problem, the BCs have to move with generator kits/ batteries.

The commission paid by banks to the BCs is not considered adequate for a viable business
model. There are costs involved in staff salaries, trainings, etc for which the current
compensation structure is not generally adequate. A majority of BCs have reported losses and
some of them have even suspended their operations. This, in turn affects the banks as it becomes
difficult for banks to substitute these BCs with others.

In case of SHG Bank linkage models, there is no support provided to BCs for meeting the group
promotion costs. Further, capacity building through training of BC staff also involves financial
outlays, which is seldom provided by banks.

From the bankers’ perspective, it was pointed out that as the banks were not allowed to pass on
to the ultimate customer/beneficiary the compensation/commission paid by them to the BCs,
they were not able to bear the various other costs incurred by BCs.

(iv) Regulatory issues

Current regulations mandate BCs to settle cash with bank branches by the end of the day or next
working day. Given that the area of operation of BCs predominantly extends to rural areas with
erratic connectivity, it becomes difficult to complete the settlements within the prescribed
timeframe. This issue assumes considerable importance in the North Eastern Region.

Reaching unbanked areas warrants higher delivery costs and the extant interest cap of BPLR for
advances up to Rs.2.00 lakhs does not allow much room for banks to compensate BCs
adequately.

Banks have reported that their requests for relaxing the distance criterion remain pending with
DCCs for a long time. Further, many requests have been rejected without any explanation.

30
(v) Multiple risks associated with the BC model

The engagement of BCs by banks for delivery of banking services exposes banks to the multiple
types of risks: (i) credit risk (ii) operational risk (iii) legal risk (iv) liquidity risk and (v)
reputational risk, to mitigate which banks need to take appropriate action.

(vi) Other issues

Sometimes the customers may want to carry out the transactions at the base branch (instead of at
the BC outlet) which could be considered.

CHAPTER V: SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

The spread of banking facilities, though impressive, has been uneven in the country, throwing up
challenges for achieving financial inclusion. In fact, despite impressive growth of branch
network in India, the vast sections of the society remain financially excluded and continue to
remain away from the formal system and thereby access to financial services including savings,
credit and insurance.

INFERENCE DRAWN

31
The above issues were examined and the inferences drawn there are as under:

(i) Acceptance of BC model by banks

Given the right impetus, the BC model has the potential to speed up the process of financial
inclusion in the country and bring the vast majority of population within the banking fold. The
Group recognizes the fact that the process of financial inclusion involves the three critical
aspects of (a) access to banking markets, (b) access to credit markets and (c) financial education.
The BC model should, therefore, encompass each of the above three aspects in order to be able
to address the issue of financial inclusion in a holistic manner. Towards this end, there should be
a proper understanding and appreciation of the BC model by all stakeholders, in particular, by
the banks. Banks need to appreciate the benefits arising out of adopting the ‘branchless’ BC
model and implement the same with missionary zeal so as to achieve the ultimate goal of
financial inclusion. The full scope of the model can be realized not just by opening no-frills
accounts but by including the above three aspects as integral components of the model. Further,
it also needs to be recognized that the BC model may not be a viable activity on a stand-alone
basis.

(ii) Cash handling

Given the problems relating to cash handling, generally only those entities which have cash
inflow/outflow as part of their normal activities would be better suited to take on the role of BCs.
Cash management could be streamlined by adopting “Cash Routes” (linking various BCs which
are in close proximity to each other to a base branch) wherever warranted with suitable cash
transit insurance, which may be borne by the banks.

(iii) Financial Education and Consumer Protection

32
One of the important components of Financial Inclusion is financial education of the customer in
the vernacular language/s. Although banks have started taking initiatives in this regard, the need
to scale up their efforts substantially towards educating the clientele regarding the benefits of
banking habits is evident from the experiences gained. For this purpose, drawing up appropriate
awareness modules and extending necessary financial support from the Financial Inclusion Fund
administered by NABARD may be considered.

Information regarding BCs engaged by banks is not put in public domain. The Annual Reports of
banks generally do not include the progress in respect of extending banking services through the
BC model and the initiatives taken by banks in this regard. This information should be given
wide publicity through print and electronic media.

The banks may educate their customers through various means - print, electronic etc., - the role
of the BC and their own obligations towards the customers in the vernacular languages.

The banks would be required to ensure the preservation and protection of the security and
confidentiality of customer information in the custody or possession of the BC. Access to
customer information by the staff of the BC should be limited to those areas where the
information is required in order to perform the function assigned to the BC by the bank. The BC
should be able to identify and segregate the information relating to the transactions as BC from
the other transactions carried out in the normal course of business.

Banks also need to put in place an appropriate grievance redressal mechanism, which should be
widely publicized and also placed in public domain. The details of the grievance redressal officer
should be displayed at the premises of the BC as also at the base branch and made available by
the bank/BC at the request of the customer.

(iv) Ensuring viability of BC model

It is apparent that the BC model can be successful only if sufficient business is generated, the
commission earned by the BC is commensurate and banks own up the BCs as their agents. Banks
may, therefore, need to have a relook at the compensation structure for BCs.

At present, the BC model is largely perceived as a channel for undertaking only liability side
business (deposits). Experiences from the field suggest that in many cases, banks are using the

33
BCs for opening no-frills accounts through which the various government payments like
NREGA, pensions and other social security payments are routed. If the BCs are used merely for
this purpose, the income generated by the BCs will not be sustainable over a period. For a BC to
become viable, the range of services to be delivered through the BC should be ramped up to
include suitable small savings, micro credit, micro insurance, small value remittances, etc.

Banks (and not BCs) may be permitted to collect reasonable service charges from the customer,
in a transparent manner, for delivering services through the BC model. Suitable guidelines may
be issued by RBI in this regard, especially keeping in view the profile of customers using these
services.

The BC model provides an opportunity to banks to save on costs which they would have incurred
in case they had gone in for the ‘brick and mortar’ branch model. Further, BCs help banks in
taking their low value/high volume transactions out of the branch premises and to that extent
there is a potential saving in costs. Some of these cost savings by adopting the BC model could
be passed on to the BCs by banks, to a certain extent, to make the model viable. Banks may
consider bearing the initial set up cost of the BCs and extend a handholding support to the BCs,
at least during the initial stages. Banks may also need to bear the costs relating to transit
insurance of the cash handled by BCs.

In order to improve the viability of the BC model, banks may consider providing reasonable
temporary overdrafts to the BCs free of interest charges.

(v) Regulatory issues

Considering the special features of the North Eastern Region, BCs in that area need to be
permitted to account for the transactions in the bank’s books by the end of the second working
day from the date of the transaction.

As regards cases referred to the DCCs for relaxation of distance criteria, they would require to
give their decisions at the earliest and in any case within a period of three months from the date
of reference to them. In case no decision is conveyed by the DCCs within this period, the banks
may be permitted to treat it as a ‘no objection’ for relaxation of the distance criterion.

(vi) Risk Mitigation measures

34
To address the various risks involved in rendering banking services through the BC model, banks
need to put in place suitable and adequate risk mitigation measures. Further, the guidelines on
‘Outsourcing of Financial Services’ issued by the Reserve Bank on November 3, 2006 have to be
kept in view by banks while entering into an outsourcing agreement. Banks may be guided by
the instructions contained therein, as relevant, while implementing the BC model.

(vii) Others

In case a customer so desires, banks may, subject to suitable safeguards, allow the customer to
carry out the transactions at the base branch. RBI may issue suitable clarification in this regard to
banks.

As regards technology issues, RBI has already advised banks to adopt appropriate technology in
their financial inclusion efforts, which would be highly secure, amenable to audit and follow
widely accepted open standards to allow inter-operability among the different systems adopted
by different banks. Further, providing the required support to banks from the Financial Inclusion
Technology Fund for the above purpose may be considered.

Banks may also develop suitable training modules in the local language/s, in order to provide
proper attitudinal orientation and skills to the BCs. Indian Institute of Banking & Finance (IIBF)
has already developed training modules for BCs. These modules may be translated in vernacular
languages and leveraged extensively so as to reach a wider group.

SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS

The major recommendations of the Working Group are summarized below:

Realizing the full potential of the BC model

Given the right impetus, the BC model has the potential to speed up the process of financial
inclusion in the country and bring the vast majority of population within the banking fold. The
Group recognizes the fact that the process of financial inclusion involves the three critical
aspects of (a) access to banking markets, (b) access to credit markets and (c) financial education.
The BC model should, therefore, encompass each of the above three aspects in order to be able
to address the issue of financial inclusion in a holistic manner. The full scope of the model can

35
be realized not just by opening no-frills accounts but by synthesizing the above three aspects as
integral components of the model. Towards this end, there should be proper understanding and
appreciation of the BC model by all stakeholders, in particular, by banks. Banks need to
appreciate the benefits arising out of adopting the ‘branchless’ BC model and implement the
same with missionary zeal so as to achieve the ultimate goal of financial inclusion.

Cash handling

Entities which have cash inflow/outflow as part of their normal activities may be generally
considered to take on the role of BCs so that the issues relating to cash handling are addressed

Banks could think in terms of streamlining cash management by adopting ‘Cash Routes’
wherever warranted with suitable cash transit insurance to be borne by the banks.

Financial Education and Consumer Protection

Banks need to scale up their efforts substantially towards educating the clientele in their
respective vernacular languages regarding the benefits of banking habit. For this purpose,
extending necessary financial support from the Financial Inclusion Fund administered by
NABARD may be considered.

Information regarding BCs engaged by banks may be placed on the banks’ websites. The Annual
Reports of banks should also include the progress in respect of extending banking services
through the BC model and the initiatives taken by banks in this regard. Banks may also use print
and electronic media (including in the vernacular language) to give wide publicity about
implementation of BC model by them.

The banks may educate their customers through various means – print, electronic, etc. - the role
of the BC and their obligation towards the customers, in the vernacular language.

The banks need to ensure the preservation and protection of the security and confidentiality of
customer information in the custody or possession of the BCs.

Banks may put in an appropriate grievance redressal mechanism, which should be widely
publicized and also placed in public domain. The details of the grievance redressal officer should

36
be displayed at the premises of the BC as also at the base branch and made available by the
bank/BC at the request of the customer.

Ensuring viability of BC model

The BC model can succeed only if the banks own up the BCs as their agents. Banks may need to
have a relook at the compensation structure for BCs.

The range of services to be delivered through the BC should be ramped up to include suitable
small savings, micro-credit, micro-insurance, small value remittances etc.

Banks may be permitted to collect reasonable service charges from the customer, in a transparent
manner, for delivering services through the BC model. Suitable guidelines may be issued by RBI
in this regard, especially keeping in view the profile of customers using these services.

Banks may bear the initial set up cost of the BCs and extend a handholding support to the BCs, at
least during the initial stages. Banks may also need to bear the costs relating to transit insurance
of the cash handled by BCs.

In order to improve the viability of the BC model, banks may consider providing reasonable
temporary overdrafts to the BCs free of interest charges.

Regulatory issues

Reserve Bank may permit banks to allow, with suitable safeguards, the BCs in the North Eastern
Region to account for the transactions in the bank’s books by the end of the second working day
from the date of the transaction.

As regards cases referred to DCCs for relaxation of distance criteria, they should give their
decisions at the earliest and in any case within a period of three months from the date of
reference to them. In case no decision is conveyed by DCCs within this period, the banks may be
permitted to treat it as a ‘no objection’ for relaxation of the distance criterion.

Risk Mitigation Measures

To address the various risks involved in rendering banking services through the BC model, banks
need to put in place suitable and adequate risk mitigation measures. Further, banks may be

37
guided by the instructions contained in the guidelines on ‘ Outsourcing of Financial Services’
issued by RBI on November 3, 2006, as relevant, while implementing the BC model.

Others

RBI may issue suitable clarification to the banks to the effect that in case the customer desires,
he may be allowed to carry out the transactions at the base branch.

Banks may adhere to the RBI guidelines on adoption of appropriate technology while
implementing the BC model. Further, providing the required support to banks from the Financial
Inclusion Technology Fund for the above purpose may be considered.

Banks may also develop suitable training modules in the local language/s, in order to provide
proper attitudinal orientation and skills to the BCs. Indian Institute of Banking & Finance (IIBF)
has already developed training modules for BCs. These modules may be translated in vernacular
languages and leveraged extensively so as to reach a wider group.

Additional eligible entities as BCs

The following entities may be considered for appointment as BCs in rural and semi-urban areas,
in addition to the entities presently permitted: (i) Individual kirana/medical /Fair Price shop
owners (ii) Individual Public Call Office (PCO) operators (iii) Agents of Small Savings schemes
of Government of India/Insurance Companies (iv) Individuals who own Petrol Pumps (v) Retired
teachers (vi) Authorized functionaries of well run Self Help Groups (SHGs) linked to banks.
Further, non-deposit taking NBFCs in the nature of loan companies whose microfinance
portfolio is not less than 80% of their loan outstanding may be permitted as BCs in the
financially excluded districts as identified by the Committee on Financial Inclusion(Chairman:
Dr.C.Rangarajan), only for liability products. Banks may ensure that while appointing the above
entities as BCs, the fundamental principle that the individuals are permanent residents of the area
in which they propose to operate as BCs, stands fulfilled, so as to minimize agency risks.

As regards Common Service Centers (CSCs) as BCs, a few pilots should be run in at least a
couple of States before deciding on further action.

38
As regards the North Eastern Region, Reserve Bank may issue suitable instructions to banks to
implement the recommendation made by the Committee on Financial Sector Plan (CFSP) for the
North Eastern Region(Chairperson: Smt. Usha Thorat) that where a local
organization/association not falling under any of the forms of organization listed in the Reserve
Bank guidelines is proposed by a bank after due diligence and is recommended by DLCC for
being approved as Business Correspondent, the Regional Office of the Reserve Bank may be
given powers to grant suitable exemption from the Reserve Bank guidelines.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
References from the following documents, websites & available material have been taken while
framing this project:

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_inclusion.
 Increasing financial inclusion: What the National Strategy for Financial Capability is
doing to help, Dec 2007, Financial Services Authority, UK.
 Global Savings, Assets & Financial Inclusion: Lessons, Challenges & Directions- Report
from a Global Symposium June 2007, Singapore

39
 Financial inclusion: A new microfinance initiative for APEC by John D Conroy.
 Report of the Committee on Financial Inclusion, January 2008
 Financial Inclusion Concept, Issues and Roadmap Presentation by Dr. K C Chakrabarty
Chairman and Managing Director Indian Bank, Chennai
 Action Plan: Financial Inclusion by Castle Rock Edinvar Housing Association, Scotland.
 http://www.chillibreeze.com/articles_various/Indian-Finance.asp
 http://www.nabard.org/financial_inclusion.asp
 Report on Financial Inclusion, Reserve Bank of India

40