Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Henry M. Feder Jr, Michael A. Gerber, Martin F. Randolph, Paulette S. Stelmach and
Edward L. Kaplan
Pediatrics 1999;103;47-51
DOI: 10.1542/peds.103.1.47
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
located on the World Wide Web at:
http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/103/1/47
Henry M. Feder, Jr, MD*; Michael A. Gerber, MD‡; Martin F. Randolph, MD§;
Paulette S. Stelmach, MT(ASCP), MS\; and Edward L. Kaplan, MD¶
ABSTRACT. Objective. An orally administered anti- gitis, treatment, amoxicillin, Streptococcus pyogenes,
microbial regimen for the treatment of group A b-hemo- streptococcal infections.
lytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngitis given once
rather than multiple times each day would be more con-
venient and might result in improved patient compli- ABBREVIATION. GABHS, group A b-hemolytic streptococcus.
ance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the
effectiveness of once-daily amoxicillin in the treatment
A
n orally administered antimicrobial regimen
of GABHS pharyngitis.
Patients. Children presenting to a private pediatric
for the treatment of group A b-hemolytic
office with GABHS pharyngitis. streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngitis that could
Design. Patients were randomly assigned to receive be given once rather than several times each day
orally either amoxicillin (750 mg once daily) or penicillin would be convenient, especially for children who are
V (250 mg three times a day) for 10 days. Compliance was attending school. A single daily dose might also
monitored by urine antimicrobial activity. result in improved patient compliance. Four antimi-
Outcomes. Outcomes were measured by impact on crobials are currently approved by the United States
the clinical course, eradication of GABHS within 18 to 24 Food and Drug Administration for once-daily ther-
hours, and bacteriologic treatment failure rate as deter- apy for GABHS pharyngitis: cefadroxil, cefixime, cef-
mined by follow-up throat cultures 4 to 6 and 14 to 21 tibuten, and azithromycin.1–5 Unfortunately, these
days after completing therapy. GABHS isolates were se-
rotyped to distinguish bacteriologic treatment failures
agents all have a broad spectrum of antimicrobial
(same serotype as initial throat culture) from new acqui- activity and are relatively expensive. Penicillin is the
sitions (different serotypes). treatment of choice for GABHS pharyngitis; how-
Results. During the 16 months of this study, 152 chil- ever, in two earlier studies, orally administered pen-
dren between 4 and 18 years of age (mean, 9.9 years) were icillin G and penicillin V given once daily were both
enrolled; 79 children were randomly assigned to receive ineffective in the treatment of this disease.6,7 Pharma-
once-daily amoxicillin and 73 were assigned to receive cokinetic data and clinical experience suggested that
penicillin V three times a day. The children in the two orally administered amoxicillin given once daily
treatment groups were comparable with respect to age, might be effective in the treatment of GABHS phar-
duration of illness before initiation of therapy, compli- yngitis,8 –14 as did a recent investigation by Shvartz-
ance, and signs and symptoms at presentation. There was
no significant difference in the clinical or bacteriologic
man and co-workers.15 Therefore, we initiated a pro-
responses of the patients in the two treatment groups at spective, randomized, controlled investigation to
the 18- to 24-hour follow-up visit. Bacteriologic treatment compare two treatment regimens for GABHS phar-
failures occurred in 4 (5%) of the 79 patients in the yngitis: 750 mg of amoxicillin given orally once daily
amoxicillin group and in 8 (11%) of the 73 patients in the and the conventional regimen of 250 mg of penicillin
penicillin V group. V given orally three times daily. Outcomes were
Conclusions. These data demonstrate that once-daily measured by the eradication of GABHS from the
amoxicillin therapy is as effective as penicillin V therapy upper respiratory tract 18 to 24 hours after beginning
given three times a day for the treatment of GABHS therapy, the impact on the clinical course, and the
pharyngitis, and if confirmed by additional investiga- bacteriologic treatment failure rate.1
tions, once-daily amoxicillin therapy could become an
alternative regimen for the treatment of this disease.
Pediatrics 1999;103:47–51; group A streptococcal, pharyn- PATIENTS AND METHODS
During the winter to spring of 1996 to 1997, consecutive pa-
tients between 3 and 18 years of age seen in a private pediatric
office in Danbury, Connecticut (M.F.R.) with clinical findings sug-
From the *Department of Family Medicine and Pediatrics, University of gestive of GABHS pharyngitis were enrolled in the investigation
Connecticut School of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, after written, informed consent had been obtained. Patients with a
Farmington, Connecticut; the ‡Department of Pediatrics, University of Con- history of hypersensitivity to penicillin or amoxicillin and patients
necticut School of Medicine, Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Hart- who had received antimicrobial therapy within the previous week
ford, Connecticut; §Private Practice, Danbury, Connecticut; the \Depart- were excluded.
ment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, All study patients were evaluated as previously described for
Farmington, Connecticut; and the ¶Department of Pediatrics, University of the presence of three objective signs (fever; tonsillar exudate; and
Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota. tender, enlarged cervical lymph nodes) and one subjective symp-
Received for publication Mar 20, 1998; accepted Jun 18, 1998. tom (sore throat) before and 18 to 24 hours after the initiation of
Reprint requests to (H.M.F.) Department of Family Medicine, University of antimicrobial therapy.16 Two rayon-tipped swabs (Culturette II;
Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030-3960. Marion Scientific, Kansas City, MO) were then simultaneously
PEDIATRICS (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright © 1999 by the American Acad- and vigorously rubbed over each patient’s posterior pharynx and
emy of Pediatrics. tonsils (or tonsillar fossae). One swab was used to perform a rapid
Fig 1. Specific signs and symptoms before and after 18 to 24 hours of therapy.
ARTICLES 49
Downloaded from www.pediatrics.org. Provided by Indonesia:AAP Sponsored on March 19, 2011
ment failure rate with a two-tailed a of 0.05, one bacteriologic treatment failures 4 to 11 days after
would need to enroll 353 participants in each of the completing antimicrobial therapy than the patients
treatment groups. receiving three-times-daily penicillin (0% and 6.1%,
One potential problem with using amoxicillin to respectively; P , .05).
treat suspected GABHS pharyngitis is if the patient Recently, investigators have demonstrated that
has infectious mononucleosis, the amoxicillin may once-daily azithromycin as well as once-daily reg-
produce a morbilliform rash that could be misinter- imens of several cephalosporins (eg, cefadroxil,
preted as an allergic reaction. This did not occur in cefixime, ceftibuten, cefpodoxime, cefprozil) are
our study; however, if it does occur, the rash is comparable with penicillin V administered three to
self-limited and resolves when the amoxicillin is dis- four times daily in the treatment of GABHS phar-
continued.22 The risk of this rash occurring can be yngitis1–5,23,24. However, the cost of these agents,
reduced by administering amoxicillin only to those even as a single daily dose, as well as their broader
patients who have either a positive rapid antigen spectra of antimicrobial activity, have precluded
detection test or throat culture. In addition, infec- their widespread adoption as standard therapy for
tious mononucleosis can be suspected (and amoxicil- GABHS pharyngitis.
lin avoided) if splenomegaly is present. The results of this and one earlier investigation
Previous attempts have been made to treat demonstrate that once-daily amoxicillin therapy is
GABHS pharyngitis with a single daily dose of orally effective in the treatment of GABHS pharyngitis.
administered penicillin. Breese et al6 gave 50 children Once-daily amoxicillin therapy is well-tolerated by
a single dose of 800 000 units buffered penicillin G patients and convenient for parents. Amoxicillin is
each day for 10 days and compared the outcomes of less expensive and has a narrower spectrum of anti-
these patients with those of patients who received microbial activity than the presently approved once-
standard therapy. Serotyping of isolates was not per- daily antimicrobial regimens for the treatment of
formed, and, therefore, bacteriologic treatment fail- GABHS pharyngitis. If confirmed by additional in-
ures could not be distinguished from new acquisi- vestigations, once-daily amoxicillin therapy could
tions. They found that 42% of patients had positive become an alternative regimen for the treatment of
follow-up throat cultures during the 2 months after GABHS pharyngitis.
completion of once-daily penicillin therapy. In con-
trast, 14% to 15% of the children with GABHS phar-
yngitis who had been given the same total daily dose REFERENCES
of penicillin G in either two or four divided doses 1. Bisno AL, Gerber MA, Gwaltney JM, Kaplan EL, Schwartz, RH. Diag-
had positive follow-up throat cultures. The authors nosis and management of group A streptococcal pharyngitis: a practice
guideline. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:274 –283
concluded that a single dose of 800 000 units buff-
2. Gerber MA, Randolph MF, Chanatry J, Wright LL, Anderson LR,
ered penicillin G orally each day for 10 days was Kaplan EL. Once daily therapy for streptococcal pharyngitis with ce-
inadequate for the treatment of GABHS pharyngitis. fadroxil. J Pediatr. 1986;109:531–537
In 1989, we reported that a single daily dose of 3. Hooton TM. A Comparison of azithromycin and penicillin V for the
penicillin V (750 mg) for 10 days was comparable to treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis. Am J Med. 1991;91:23S–26S
4. Block SL, Hedrick JA, Tyler RD. Comparative study of the effectiveness
250 mg of penicillin V three times daily for 10 days in of cefixime and penicillin V for the treatment of streptococcal pharyn-
its ability to eradicate GABHS from the upper respi- gitis in children and adolescents. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992;11:919 –925
ratory tract in 18 to 24 hours and in its impact on the 5. Pichichero ME, McLinn SE, Gooch M III, et al. Ceftibuten versus peni-
clinical course of the disease. However, a bacterio- cillin V in group A b-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis. Pediatr Infect
logic treatment failure occurred in 6 (8%) of the 76 Dis J. 1995;14:S102–S107
6. Breese BB, Disney FA, Talpey WB. Penicillin in streptococcal infections:
patients in the three-times-daily group and in 16 total dose and frequency of administration. Am J Dis Child. 1965;110:
(22%) of the 74 patients in the once-daily group (P , 125–130
.05).7 In a preliminary investigation in which patients 7. Gerber MA, Randolph MF, DeMeo K, Feder HM Jr, Kaplan EL. Failure
received 1500 mg of penicillin V once-daily for 10 of once-daily penicillin V therapy for streptococcal pharyngitis. Am J Dis
days, we observed a 20% bacteriologic treatment fail- Child. 1989;143:153–155
8. Ginsburg CM, McCracken GH Jr, Thomas ML, Clahsen J. Comparative
ure rate, suggesting that a doubling of the single pharmacokinetics of amoxicillin and ampicillin in infants and children.
daily dose of penicillin V would not have been effec- Pediatrics. 1979;64:627– 631
tive.7 9. Neu HC. Amoxicillin. Ann Intern Med. 1979;90:356 –360
In the only previous investigation of once-daily 10. Johnson DWG, Kvale PA, Afable VL, Stewart SD, Halverson CW,
Holmes KK. Single-dose antibiotic treatment of asymptomatic gonor-
amoxicillin in the treatment of GABHS pharyngitis,
rhea in hospitalized women. N Engl J Med. 1970;283:1– 6
Shvartzman et al15 compared a group of 82 patients 11. Karney WW, Turck M, Holmes KK. Single-dose oral therapy for un-
who received 250 mg of penicillin V given three or complicated gonorrhea: comparison of amoxicillin and ampicillin given
four times daily for 10 days with a group of 75 with and without probenecid. J Infect Dis. 1974;129:S250 –S256
patients who received a once-daily dose of amoxicil- 12. Nelson JD, Mohs E, Dajani AS, Plotkin SA. Gonorrhea in pre-school and
school-aged children. JAMA. 1976;236:1359 –1364
lin (50 mg/kg for children not to exceed the adult 13. Stillerman M, Isenberg HD, Facklam RR. Treatment of pharyngitis
dose and 750 mg for adults) for 10 days. There was associated with group A streptococcus: comparison of amoxicillin and
no difference observed in the clinical responses of the potassium phenoxy methyl penicillin. J Infect Dis. 1974;129:S169 –S177
patients in the two treatment groups or in the pro- 14. Breese BB, Disney FA, Talpey WB, Green JL. Treatment of streptococcal
portion of patients in the two treatment groups with pharyngitis with amoxicillin. J Infect Dis. 1974;129:S178 –S180
15. Shvartzman P, Tabenkin H, Rosentzwaig A, Dolginov. Treatment of
positive throat cultures 24 to 48 hours after initiating streptococcal pharyngitis with amoxycillin once a day. Br Med J. 1993;
antimicrobial therapy. However, the patients receiv- 306:1170 –1172
ing once-daily amoxicillin had significantly fewer 16. Randolph MF, Gerber MA, DeMeo KK, Wright L. Effect of antibiotic
Boren JH. Arcane and proud of it. New York Times. June 4, 1998
Submitted by Student
ARTICLES 51
Downloaded from www.pediatrics.org. Provided by Indonesia:AAP Sponsored on March 19, 2011
Once-Daily Therapy for Streptococcal Pharyngitis With Amoxicillin
Henry M. Feder Jr, Michael A. Gerber, Martin F. Randolph, Paulette S. Stelmach and
Edward L. Kaplan
Pediatrics 1999;103;47-51
DOI: 10.1542/peds.103.1.47
Updated Information including high-resolution figures, can be found at:
& Services http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/103/1/47
References This article cites 16 articles, 6 of which you can access for free
at:
http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/103/1/47#BIBL
Citations This article has been cited by 14 HighWire-hosted articles:
http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/103/1/47#otherarticles
Subspecialty Collections This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the
following collection(s):
Infectious Disease & Immunity
http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/collection/infectious_disease
Permissions & Licensing Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures,
tables) or in its entirety can be found online at:
http://www.pediatrics.org/misc/Permissions.shtml
Reprints Information about ordering reprints can be found online:
http://www.pediatrics.org/misc/reprints.shtml