Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Fiona Ross
The Framework
The typing of personality assumes a classificatory framework within which one person’s
type can be compared and contrasted with another. The framework for Jung’s typology
has a mandala configuration, a squared circle divided into four with a cross radiating to or
from the centre, carrying the promise of balance, union and the connection of opposites.
For Jung the mandala was an expression of the psyche and a symbol of self-realisation
and individuation. This configuration creates the diagram of a unitary and centralized
psychological field in which a person is operating.
Historical Influences
Oriental Astrologers who classified people according to zodiacal signs presiding over
the elements earth, air, fire and water. This system was depicted as a circle with centre,
cross and opposites.
Hippocrates who established the belief in ancient Greece that the balance of body fluids,
considered as two pairs of opposites, blood and phlegm, choler and bile, determined
character.
In contrast, Christianity upheld the principles of love and faith but kept knowledge
(thinking) at a distance.
The eighteenth century German poet and philosopher Schiller wrote of a nucleus (e.g.
poetry) that could be separated out into its opposites. For example, poetry could be
divided into Naïve poetry, dominated by sensations, in which the poet is pulled into the
object, and Sentimental poetry which is intuitive and characterised by the poet’s
reflection on an inner impression of the object. Jung saw a congruence between Naïve
and Extraversion and between Sentimental and Introversion.
Jung drew on the work of the philosopher Nietzsche and the psychologist William
James in postulating the opposing attitudinal types of Introversion and Extraversion.
Nietzsche distinguished between the Apollonian impulse which was introspective,
creating an inner vision, a state comparable to dreaming, and the Dionysian impulse of
unbounded instinct gripped by barbaric nature. James characterised two temperaments,
the Rationalist who believes in abstract and eternal principles and the factual Empiricist.
He tabulated pairs of opposing qualities characterising the two types. Although not
agreeing with James’ characteristics, Jung also believed in pairs of opposite qualities.
Attitudinal type
Jung understood theory as an expression of the personality type of the theorist. He saw
Freud’s extraversion reflected in his predominantly centrifugal theory, emphasizing a
striving for pleasure in the object combined with repression of unacceptable wish
tendencies. This contrasted with Adler’s centripetal, or introverted, theory with its central
concept of ego superiority, supremacy of the subject.
Jung wanted to create a psychology which was equally fair to both types. In 1913 he
published ‘A Contribution to the Study of Psychological Types’ which consolidated his
separation from Freud and presented his first ideas on differing types of consciousness. In
this paper Jung argued that there were two contrary movements of the libido;
Extraversion, with interest given to the outer world, and Introversion, implying a
devaluation of the object world. These represented two habitual orientational attitudes
towards the world; an outward movement of interest towards the object or a movement
away from the object to the subject’s own psychological processes. Extraverted
psychopathology was associated with defences against depression, whereas introversion
was characterised by defences against emotional isolation.
Psychological Functions
Consciousness was seen by Jung as a product of both rational and irrational processes of
encountering and assessing reality. Sensation and Intuition are the irrational functions in
the sense of their being perceptive, data gathering modes. Thinking (objective) and
Feeling (subjective) are the rational functions: they are ways of processing information
and making decisions. Sensation tells us that a thing is, Thinking tells us what the thing is
and Feeling tells us what it is worth to us. Intuition is about trusting hunches. For Jung
psychological disturbance reflected psychic imbalance, with neurosis over-emphasizing
the characteristic traits of a personality. One of the major tasks of the first half of life was
to learn to express effectively one’s dominant function and attitude.
Extraverted Thinking
Principled, idealistic, objective, rational.
Introverted Thinking
Influenced by ideas, independent, often fearful of intimacy.
Extraverted Feeling
Adaptive, relating well to the external.
Introverted Feeling
Sympathetic, pleases others, may be dependent, reserved.
Extraverted Sensation
Realistic, concrete, pleasant and friendly.
Introverted Sensation
Calm and passive, restrained, controlled and controlling.
Extraverted Intuition
Enterprising, outgoing, can be irresponsible.
Introverted Intuition
Mystical, dreamer and artist. Can be obsessive.
Jung classified himself as an introverted thinker with intuition as his next strongest
function.
Beebe (2006) has deepened Jung’s theory by linking function-attitudes with archetypes
and archetypal complexes. Mahlberg (1987) has broadened Jungian theory in associating
the four functions with the concept of morphic resonance, propounded by the biochemist
Rupert Sheldrake, whose theory is one of formative causation whereby the forms of
previous systems influence the morphogenesis of subsequent similar systems. Mahlberg
linked Introverted Feeling with sensitivity to morphic resonance, and Extraverted Feeling
with the ability to transmit morphic resonance.
The Myers-Briggs Type Inventory was devised to put Jungian typology to practical use
outside the analytic process. A combination of the two attitudes and four functions, with
the addition of Perception and Judgement, which were regarded as implicit in Jung’s
work, give sixteen different types. The results of a paper and pencil questionnaire give
four letters indicating the dynamic relationship between attitudes and functions for any
one individual. The inventory has become the most widespread commercial application
of Jungian theory.
References
Arraj, J. (1986) Jung’s Forgotten Bridge. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 31(2), pp.
173-180.
Beebe, J. (2006) Psychological Types, ch. 6 in The Handbook of Jungian Psychology, ed.
Papadopoulos, R. K., London: Routledge.
Jung, C.G. (1971) General Description of the Types, in Psychological Types, Collected
Works vol. 6, Ch. X, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Myers, K.D. and Kirby, L.K. (1994) Introduction to Type: Dynamics and Development,
Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
Quenk, N.L. (1996) In the Grip: Our Hidden Personality, Palo Alto, California:
Consulting Psychologists Press.
Von Franz, M.-L. (1971) The Inferior Function, Part 1 of Lectures on Jung’s Typology,
Woodstock, Connecticut: Spring Publications.