Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
on Lyophilization Cycle
Development
Thomas W. Patapoff and David E. Overcashier
L
The freezing method yophilization (freeze-drying) is often the ease of water-vapor flow) as a function of
used during used to prepare dry pharmaceutical position and cooling rate. The variations
lyophilization can formulations to achieve commercially appeared to be largely due to variations in sample
substantially affect
viable shelf lives. The process morphology. Searles et al. reported some effects
the structure of the
ice formed, the water-
comprises three steps: freezing, primary of freezing on the rate of primary drying in vials
vapor flow during drying, and secondary drying. As water (11). They found that the primary drying rate was
primary drying, and freezes in the first step, the dissolved dependent on the ice nucleation temperature.
the quality of the final components in the formulation remain in the resid- Faster drying was also attributed to an increase in
dried product. ual liquid, a phase termed the freeze-concentrate. lamellar ice crystal content, formed when ice
Controlling how a At the point of maximal ice formation, the freeze- nucleants from Pseudomonas syringae were
solution freezes can
concentrate solidifies between the ice crystals that added in the vial contents. Searles and colleagues
shorten lyophilization
make up the lattice. Under appropriate lyophiliza- also showed that adding a properly specified an-
cycles and produce
more stable tion conditions, the ice is removed by sublimation nealing step in the freezing procedure increased
formulations. during primary drying, leaving the remaining the drying rate (12).
freeze-concentrate in the same physical and chemi- Our article describes the effects of several
cal structure as when the ice was present. Residual freezing methods on water-vapor flow during pri-
water in the freeze-concentrate is removed in the mary drying and on the final dried cake structure.
secondary drying step.
Lyophilization cycle development typically NORMAL FREEZING AND SUBLIMATION
focuses on optimizing the primary drying step. When freeze-drying pharmaceutical products,
That is the most time consuming of the three manufacturers place vials containing aqueous
steps, and the primary drying parameters are formulations on shelves within a lyophilizer. Typi-
easily adjustable. They can affect both the time cally, the shelf temperature is then decreased (from
involved and the quality of the resulting cake. 5 °C) over three hours and held at a low tempera-
Extensive investigation of primary drying has ture (typically 40 °C to 50 °C) to ensure that
demonstrated that two important parameters are all the vials freeze completely. As the temperature
chamber pressure and shelf temperature (1–9). decreases, the liquid cools below the freezing point
They are usually adjusted to maximize the rate of of the solution: Supercooled temperatures range
heat transfer to each vial (speeding ice sublima- from 10 °C to 20 °C with ice nucleation typi-
tion) without causing cake collapse. cally occurring at 15 °C. Freezing point depres-
Less attention has been paid to the freezing sion accounts for a lowering of the freezing tem-
conditions and their potential effect on the pri- perature by only 1.8 kelvin per molal. Most
mary and secondary drying processes and on the pharmaceutical manufacturing relies on supercool-
characteristics of the final product. Kochs et al. ing because of the lack of nucleation centers in the
reported the effects of freezing conditions on pri- formulations (such as particulates in solution or
mary drying in a specially designed aluminum imperfections on the inside surface of the vials).
and plastic sample cell (10). They observed varia- In a supercooled solution at 15 °C, ice can
tions in vapor diffusion coefficients (a measure of nucleate and propagate through the solution.
Dried Layer
temperature. The ice sublimation front moves
6,000
downward through the frozen plug, a process that
makes the water vapor transit through the chan- 4,000
nels left by the sublimed ice above. Those narrow,
often tortuous channels resist vapor flow, so subli- 2,000
Dried Layer
4,000
3,000 Freezing methods are seldom investigated
because freezing is difficult to control. Normally,
2,000
pharmaceutical products supercool to roughly
1,000
15 °C before nucleating, which is difficult to
0 overcome by standard processes. Ice might be
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Dried layer thickness (cm) induced to nucleate at higher temperatures (closer
to 0 °C) by conditioning the bottom surface of the
Figure 5. Cumulative mass transfer resistance as glass vial. Nucleation would then occur on the
a function of dried layer thickness for active and bottom surface, and the ice would propagate in a
placebo material vertical direction resulting in lower MTRs. Vials
with that characteristic are not yet available.
perature for primary drying, which then matches Annealing can be more practical but also has
that of a standard-frozen material dried at a colder limitations. Whether annealing influences the
shelf temperature. That higher shelf temperature time for lyophilization or the temperature varia-
adds driving force to the heat transfer, speeding tions of the product during freezing needs to be
primary drying. For equivalent product tempera- demonstrated.
tures, the rate of sublimation was 40% faster for Shortening the cycle. The freezing method used
Figure 4. SEM micrographs of vertically oriented ice than for standard-frozen so- during lyophilization can have a significant effect
freeze-dried material and the lutions (Table 1). That leads to a decrease in the on the structure of the ice formed, affecting both
effect of formulation on time required for primary drying — which consti- the water-vapor flow during primary drying and
microstructure: (a) placebo tutes half of the time spent in the lyophilization the final product. Freezing protein solutions in
(45 mg/mL trehalose, process. Such a decrease should also be expected vials with vertically propagated crystals may
0.1 mg/mL polysorbate 20, and from annealed vials, so the duration of the prevent a thick skin from forming on the top of
5 mM histidine at 6.0 pH) and lyophilization cycle should be reduced as well. the lyophilized cake. The structure of vertically
(b) active protein (25 mg/mL frozen material facilitates fast water-vapor flow
rhuMAb HER2, 20 mg/mL OTHER CONSEQUENCES OF FREEZING during primary drying, resulting in lower product
trehalose, 0.1 mg/mL The freezing process can have unexpected conse- temperatures. By increasing the primary drying
polysorbate 20, and 5 mM quences on product quality. For example, some shelf temperature, the rate of sublimation was
histidine at 6.0 pH) (photo forms of sodium phosphate can crystallize upon 40% faster in our studies for the vertically frozen
courtesy of Genentech, Inc.) slow freezing or annealing, resulting in a pH material than for the standard-frozen material
decrease in the freeze-concentrate (21–23). A de- with an equivalent product temperature. We also
crease in pH has been shown to affect the stability observed increased sublimation in material
of a drug when frozen and after lyophilization annealed during the freezing segment. Decreased
(24–26). Other excipients that crystallize during surface area correlates with increased product sta-
freezing (for example, mannitol) can lose their abil- bility for some proteins. Understanding and con-
ity to stabilize proteins in the dried state (27–30). trolling how a solution freezes can lead to shorter
Some proteins undergo cold denaturation during lyophilization cycles and, in some cases, more
slow freezing or annealing, which can have delete- stable products.
rious effects on product quality upon reconstitution.
Freezing methods can alter the void–solid ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are indebted to Jamie Moore, Mary
interfacial area of a lyophilized cake and, Cromwell, Anne Nguyen, Al Stern, and Chung Hsu for
inversely, the thickness of its channel walls. An technical assistance and consultation.
increased surface area correlates with decreased
Corresponding author Thomas W.
Patapoff is a senior scientist and dried product stability for some proteins (31). REFERENCES
(1) S.L. Nail, “The Effect of Chamber Pressure on Heat
director, and David E. Overcashier Freezing by immersing a vial into liquid nitrogen Transfer in the Freeze Drying of Parenteral
is a senior process engineer in can result in increased protein aggregation (32) or Solutions,” PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 34,
Pharmaceutical R&D at decreased enzyme activity (33) when compared 358–368 (1980).
(2) M.J. Pikal et al., “Physical Chemistry of Freeze-
Genentech, Inc., One DNA Way, with freezer-cooled samples. Preliminary studies Drying: Measurement of Sublimation Rates for
South San Francisco, CA 94080, indicate that the freezing method has a significant Frozen Aqueous Solutions by a Microbalance
650.225.8006, fax 650.225.7234, Technique,” J. Pharm. Sci. 72, 635–650 (1983).
effect on dried protein stability (Table 2). In addi-
tomp@gene.com, www.gene.com.
20 BioPharm MARCH 2002
(3) M.J. Pikal, M.L. Roy, and S. Shah, “Mass and Determines the Primary Drying Rate of Freeze-Dried Phosphates Studied by Scanning
Heat Transfer in Vial Freeze-Drying of Lyophilization for Samples Frozen on a Electron Microscopy and Differential
Pharmaceuticals: Role of the Vial,” J. Pharm. Temperature-Controlled Shelf,” Scanning Calorimetry,” Cryobiology, 28,
Sci. 73, 1224–1237 (1984). J. Pharm. Sci., 90(7), 860–871 (2001). 364–375 (1991).
(4) M.J. Pikal, “Use of Laboratory Data in Freeze (12) J.A. Searles, J.F. Carpenter, and T.W. (18) B.S. Chang and C.S. Randall, “Use of
Drying Process Design: Heat and Mass Randolph, “Annealing to Optimize the Primary Subambient Thermal Analysis to Optimize
Transfer Coefficients and the Computer Drying Rate, Reduce Freezing-Induced Drying Protein Lyophilization,” Cryobiology, 29,
Simulation of Freeze Drying,” PDA J. Rate Heterogeneity, and Determine Tg in 632–656 (1992).
Parenteral Sci. Technol. 39, 115–139 (1985). Pharmaceutical Lyophilization,” J. Pharm. Sci. (19) R. Haikala et al., “Polymorphic Changes of
(5) R.G. Livesey and T.W.G. Rowe, “A 90, 872–887 (2001). Mannitol During Freeze-Drying: Effect of
Discussion of the Effect of Chamber Pressure (13) G. Jancso, J. Pupezin, W.A. Van Hook, “The Surface-Active Agents,” PDA J. Pharm. Sci.
on Heat and Mass Transfer in Freeze-Drying,” Vapor Pressure of Ice Between +10-2 and Technol., 51, 96–101 (1997).
J. Parenteral Sci. Technol. 41, 169–171 10+2,” J. Phys. Chem. 74, 2984–2989 (20) N. Milton et al., “Evaluation of Manometric
(1987). (1970). Temperature Measurement as a Method of
(6) M.J. Pikal and S. Shah, “The Collapse (14) L. Gatlin and P.P. DeLuca, “A Study of the Monitoring Product Temperature During
Temperature in Freeze Drying: Dependence on Phase Transitions in Frozen Antibiotic Lyophilization,” PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol.,
Measurement Methodology and Rate of Water Solutions by Differential Scanning 51, 7–16 (1997).
Removal from the Glassy Phase,” Calorimetry,” PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol., (21) L. van den Berg and D. Rose, “Effect of
Int. J. Pharm. 62, 165–186 (1990). 34, 398–408 (1980). Freezing on the pH and Composition of
(7) M.J. Pikal, “Freeze-Drying of Proteins, Part 1: (15) E. Tarelli et al., “Additives to Biological Sodium and Potassium Phosphate Solutions:
Process Design,” BioPharm 3(8), 18–27 (1990). Substances III: The Moisture Content and The Reciprocal System KH2PO4-Na2HPO4-
(8) B.S. Chang and N.L. Fischer, “Development Moisture Uptake of Commonly Used Carrier H2O,” Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 81, 319–329
of an Efficient Single-Step Freeze-Drying Agents Undergoing Processing Conditions (1959).
Cycle for Protein Formulations,” Pharm. Res. Similar to Those Used in the Preparation of (22) N. Murase and F. Franks, “Salt Precipitation
12, 831–837 (1995). International Biological Standards,” During the Freeze-Concentration of Phosphate
(9) D.E. Overcashier, T.W. Patapoff, and C.C. Hsu, J. Biol. Stand., 15, 331–340 (1987). Buffer Solutions,” Biophys. Chem., 34,
“Lyophilization of Protein Formulations in (16) P.J. Dawson and D.J. Hockley, “Scanning 293–300 (1989).
Vials: Investigation of the Relationship Between Electron Microscopy of Freeze-Dried (23) G. Gomez, M.J. Pikal, and N. Rodriguez-
Resistance to Vapor Flow During Primary Preparations: Relationship of Morphology to Hornedo, “Effect of Initial Buffer Composition
Drying and Small-Scale Product Collapse,” J. Freeze-Drying Parameters,” International on pH Changes During Far-from-Equilibrium
Pharm. Sci., 88, 688–695 (1999). Symposium on Biological Product Freeze- Freezing of Sodium Phosphate Buffer
(10) M. Kochs et al., “The Influence of the Drying Parameters, Bethesda, MD. Solutions,” Pharm. Res., 18, 90–97 (2001).
Freezing Process on Vapour Transport During Developments in Biological Standards, Vol. 74 (24) T.J. Anchordoquy and J.F. Carpenter,
Sublimation in Vacuum-Freeze-Drying of (S. Karger AG, Basel, Switzerland, 1990), “Polymers Protect Lactate Dehydrogenase
Macroscopic Samples,” Int. J. Heat Mass pp.185–192. During Freeze-Drying by Inhibiting
Transfer, 36, 1727–1738 (1993). (17) N. Murase, P. Echlin, and F. Franks, “The
Continued on page 72
(11) J.A. Searles, J.F. Carpenter, and T.W. Structural States of Freeze-Concentrated and
Randolph, “The Ice Nucleation Temperature