Human Rights Alert

PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750

Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

11-03-28 PRESS RELEASE: Multiple Social Security numbers linked to President Obama
- initial signs of Fraud in litigation in the US District Court, Washington DC
The case is characterized by the relatively simple underlying facts and law. The Chief Judge
of the US District Court in Washington DC Royce Lamberth may proceed to dismiss the
complaint under pretense of judicial review. However, the practice of pretense litigation
undermines any remaining credibility of the US justice system.

Chief Judge Royce Lamberth, US District Court, Washington DC

Los Angeles, March 28 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, have published commencing
records and reports from litigation of Taitz v Astrue in the US District Court, Washington DC, claiming that
the litigation has already been set up for Fraud on the Court - as pretense litigation. [i ,ii ]
The complaint in Taitz v Astrue was filed by Dr Orly Taitz against the Social Security Commissioner Michael
Astrue, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. The complaint pertained to refusal of the Social Security
Administration to release information, which was requested as part of efforts to ascertain the validity, or lack
thereof, of various Social Security numbers linked to President Barack Obama.
The complaint includes as exhibits two affidavits by licensed Private Investigators:
− Susan Elizabeth Daniels from Ohio, who located a total of nine (9) Social Security numbers linked to
President Obama, and
− Neil Sankey from California (former Detective Sergeant, New Scotland Yard), who located a total of
thirty nine (39) Social Security numbers linked to President Obama.
While the significance of these findings is at present unclear, Dr Zernik claims that treatment of the case by
the US District Court in Washington DC is alarming.
Review of commencing records in the litigation shows that:
− A civil docket was initiated in the case with invalid Civil Cover Sheet, in disregard of the Civil Litigation
Management Manual of the Judicial Conference of the United States; [iii ]
− Summons was issued by the Office of the Clerk, but was not docketed, in apparent violation of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
− Since the Summons was not docketed, no electronic certificate of authentication/attestation (NEF –
Notice of Electronic Filing) [iv ,v ] could possibly be issued for the Summons, which would therefore
render the Summons an invalid court record;
− Chief Judge of the US District Court, Washington DC Royce Lamberth is listed as Presiding Judge in
the case, with no valid Assignment Order.
Combined, the records indicate that from the outset the litigation of Taitz v Astrue has been set up by the
Office of Clerk Nancy Mayer-Whittington and Chief Judge Royce Lamberth as pretense litigation.
z Page 2/2 March 28, 2011

Pretense litigation is the practice of the US courts of conducting court cases, where all records are
deemed void by the court itself, but are published in the online public access system in a misleading
manner as valid court records. Minutes, orders, and judgment are not entered, or entered with invalid
electronic certificate of authentication/attestation by the clerks of the courts. In other cases, the offices
of the clerks of the courts deny access to the electronic certificate of authentication/attestation in alleged
violation of First Amendment rights. Therefore, the US courts leave the public unable to distinguish,
whether the court records are valid or void.
The conduct of pretense litigation has been documented in the US courts from coast to coast, including
cases of high public policy significance. [ vi , vii ] Some of the cases were extensively covered by US media
and international media, which failed to report the invalidity of the litigation records. The practice is
facilitated by the electronic public access and case management systems of the US courts (PACER and
CM/ECF). [ viii ]
The case at hand is characterized by the relatively simple underlying facts and law. The Chief Judge of
the US District Court in Washington DC Royce Lamberth may proceed to dismiss the complaint under
pretense of judicial review. However, the practice of pretense litigation undermines any remaining
credibility of the US justice system.
LINKS:
i
11-02-16 Taitz v Astrue (1:11-cv-00402) in the US District Court, Washington, DC - pertaining to refusal of Social Security
Administration to release information regarding President Obama's Social Security data - Dkt #001: Complaint, Exhibits, Cover Sheet,
and NEF
http://www.scribd.com/doc/51556092/
ii
11-03-26 Taitz v Astrue (1:11-cv-00402) – Initial signs of Fraud in litigation in the US District, Washington DC-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/51680100/
iii
10-11-19 Civil Litigation Management Manual, Second Edition (2010) Judicial Conference of the United States, Committee on Court
Administration and Case Management
http://www.scribd.com/doc/43498081/
iv
08-02-00 US District Court Central District of California: General Order 08-02, Authorizing CM/ECF, Digital Authentication
and Attestation in NEFs
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27632471/
v
10-04-01 Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing - US District Court, Western District of Texas, Revised
April 1, 2010
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48329825/
vi
Zernik, Joseph: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation - Pretense Litigation and Pretense
Banking Regulation in the United States
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44663232/
vii
11-01-07 Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634) at the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - Motion to Intervene and
Concomitantly Filed Papers as published in the online PACER dockets
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46516034/
viii
10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts, International Journal on
Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/